- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Generalizations of some integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2021, Article number: 105 (2021)
Abstract
In this paper, we study generalizations of some integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities via \((p, q)\)-calculus. Many results obtained in this paper provide extensions of existing results in the literature. Furthermore, some examples are given to illustrate the investigated results.
1 Introduction
Quantum calculus, shortly q-calculus, is the study of calculus without limits. The history of q-calculus can be dated back to Euler, who first introduced q-calculus in the track of Newton’s work on infinite series. In 1910, F. H. Jackson [1] defined the definite q-integral, which is known as the q-Jackson integral. It was the starting point of q-calculus in a systematic way. In recent years, q-calculus has been actively developed and many researchers have been increasingly interested in the topic of q-calculus due to applications of the q-calculus in mathematics and physics such as combinatorics, dynamical systems, fractals, number theory, orthogonal polynomials, special functions, mechanics and also for scientific problems in some applied areas, see [2–16] for more details.
The subject \((p,q)\)-calculus is a generalization of q-calculus and it is two parameters quantum calculus. In 2013, P.N. Sadjang [17] studied the \((p,q)\)-derivative, the \((p,q)\)-integral, and obtained some of their properties and the fundamental of \((p,q)\)-calculus. Recently, M. Tunç, and E. Göv [18] defined the \((p,q)\)-derivative and \((p,q)\)-integral on finite interval. The applications of \((p,q)\)-calculus play important roles in physical sciences, number theory, orthogonal polynomials, see [19–23] for more details. Furthermore, they studied some properties of \((p,q)\)-calculus and \((p,q)\)-analogue of some important integral inequalities. The \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities have been studied and rapidly developed during this period by many authors, see [24–31] and the references therein.
Mathematical inequalities have been applied in various branches of mathematics like analysis, differential equations, and geometry. One of the famous inequalities is the Hardy inequality. Let us just mention that in 1920, G. H. Hardy [32] presented the following famous inequality for f being a non-negative integrable function and \(s>1\):
which is now known as Hardy inequality. This inequality plays an important role in analysis and applications, see [33, 34] for more details.
The Hardy inequality has been studied by a large number of authors during the twentieth century. Over the last 20 years, a large number of papers have appeared in the literature which deals with the simple proofs, various generalizations and discrete analogue of Hardy inequality, see [35–39] for more details.
In 2014, L. Maligranda et al. [40] studied a q-analogue of Hardy inequality (1.1) and some related inequalities. It seems to be a huge new research area to study of these so called q-Hardy type inequalities. They obtained more general results on q-Hardy type inequalities. By taking \(q \to 1\), we obtain classical results on Hardy inequality (1.1). Next, L.-E. Persson and S. Shaimardan [41] studied some q-analogue of Hardy type inequalities for the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral operator; see [42, 43] for more details.
In 1964, N. Levinson [44] presented the inequality respecting integration from a to b for \(0< a< b<\infty \), f is a non-negative integrable function and \(s>1\), then
In 2012, W.T. Sulaiman [45] gave a generalization and improvement for inequalities similar to Hardy inequality in the sense when \(f>0\) on \([a,b]\subset (0,\infty )\) and \(0< k<1\leq h\), as follows:
and
In 2013, B. Sroysang [46] presented a generalization for inequalities (1.3) and (1.4) with additional parameter m in the sense when \(f>0\) on \([a,b]\subset (0,\infty ), 0< k<1\leq h\) and \(m>0\), as follows:
and
In 2014, B. Sroysang [47] presented a new kind of Hardy inequality and obtained a direct generalization of the original Hardy inequality. Next, K. Mehrez [48] studied some generalizations and new refined Hardy type inequalities by using Jensen’s inequality and Chebyshev integral inequality, see [49–52] for more details.
In 2016, S. Wu, B. Sroysang and S. Li [53] investigated certain integral inequalities similar to the Hardy inequality. They generalized versions of some known results related to the Hardy inequality and gave some new integral inequalities of Hardy type by introducing a monotonous function and established the inequality for β being a non-negative real number, as follows:
where \(f\geq 0\), \(g>0\) on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\), \(p\geq 1\), \((x-a+\beta )/g(x)\) is non-increasing, and
for \(x\in [a,b]\).
Inspired by this ongoing study, we establish the generalization of some integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus. Many results obtained in this paper provide extensions of other results given in previous papers. Furthermore, we give some examples to illustrate the investigated results.
2 Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, let \([a,b ] \subseteq \mathbb{R}\) be an interval and \(0< q< p\leq 1\). The following definitions and theorems for \((p,q)\)-calculus are given in [17, 18, 24–29].
First, we give some \((p,q)\)-notation, which would appear in this paper. For any real number n, the \((p,q)\)-analogue of n is defined by
and
If \(p=1\), then (2.1) reduces to
which is q-analogue of n.
Definition 2.1
([24])
If \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function, then the \((p,q)\)-derivative of the function f on \([a,b]\) at x is defined by
The function f is said to be a \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \([a,b]\) if \(_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)\) exists for all \(x\in [a,b]\).
It should be noted that
In Definition 2.1, if \(a=0\), then \(_{0}D_{p,q}f=D_{p,q}f\) is defined by
And, if \(p=1\), then \(D_{p,q}f(x)=D_{q} f(x)\), which is the q-derivative of the function f, and also if \(q\to 1\) in (2.5), then it reduces to a classical derivative.
Example 2.1
Define function \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=2x^{2}+2x+c\), where c is a constant. Then, for \(x \neq a\), we have
Theorem 2.1
If \(f,g: [a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) are continuous functions and \(c,d\) are constants, then the following formulas hold:
-
(i)
\(_{a}D_{p,q}[cf(x)\pm dg(x)]=c_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)\pm d_{a}D_{p,q}g(x)\);
-
(ii)
\(_{a}D_{p,q}[f(x)g(x)]=f(px+(1-p)a)_{a}D_{p,q}g(x)+g(qx+(1-q)a)_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)\);
-
(iii)
\(_{a}D_{p,q} [\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} ]= \frac{g(px+(1-p)a)_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)-f(px+(1-p)a)_{a}D_{p,q}g(x)}{g(px+(1-p)a)g(qx+(1-q)a)}\).
The proof of this theorem is given by [18].
Definition 2.2
([24])
If \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function and \(0< a< b\), then the \((p,q)\)-integral is defined by
f is said to be a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\) if \(\int _{a}^{b}{f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x}\) exists for all \(x\in [a,b]\).
Moreover, if \(c\in (a,b)\), then \((p,q)\)-integral is defined by
If \(a=0\) in (2.6), then one can get the classical \((p, q)\)-integral defined by
and
Example 2.2
Define a function \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=x^{2}+2x+c\), where c is a constant. Then we have
The proofs of the following theorems are given in [18].
Theorem 2.2
If \(f,g: [a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) are continuous functions, \(t\in [a,b]\) and α is a constant, then the following formulas hold:
-
(i)
\({}_{a}D_{p,q}\int _{a}^{t} f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x=f(t)\);
-
(ii)
\(\int _{c}^{t} {}_{a}D_{p,q}f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x=f(t)-f(c)\) for \(c\in (a,t)\);
-
(iii)
\(\int _{a}^{t}{[f(x)+g(x)] {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x}=\int _{a}^{b}{f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x}+\int _{a}^{b}{g(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x}\);
-
(iv)
\(\int _{a}^{t}\alpha f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x=\alpha \int _{a}^{b}f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x\);
-
(v)
\(\int _{a}^{t}{(x-a)^{\alpha }} {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x= \frac{(t-a)^{\alpha +1}}{[\alpha +1]_{p,q}}\);
-
(vi)
\(\int _{c}^{t}{f(px+(1-p)a) {}_{a}D_{p,q}g(x)} {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x=(fg)(x) |_{c}^{t}-\int _{c}^{t}{g(qx+(1-q)a) {}_{a}D_{p,q}f(x) {}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x}\).
Theorem 2.3
If \(f,g: [a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) are continuous functions and \(r>1\) with \(1/r+1/s=1\), then
3 Main results
In this section, we are going to establish the generalization of some integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus. The first result is presented as follows.
Theorem 3.1
If \(f,g: [a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) are positive continuous functions and \(0< r<1\) with \(1/r+1/s=1\), then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
where \(r=1/k\) and \(1/k+1/k'=1\).
Consequently,
or
Therefore,
The proof is thus accomplished. □
Theorem 3.2
If f is a non-negative function, g is a positive function on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\), γ is a positive real number, \(r>1\), and \((x-a+\gamma )/g(x)\) is non-increasing, then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
By Theorem 2.2(v), we have
By the assumption that the function \((x-a+\gamma )/g(x)\) is non-increasing and Theorem 2.2(v), we have
This proof is completed. □
Corollary 3.1
If f is a non-negative function, γ is a positive real number, and \(r>1\), then
Remark 3.1
(1) If \(p=1\), then (3.2) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.4) reduces to an inequality, which appeared in [53].
(2) If \(0<\gamma <a\), we obtain the following inequality:
Also, if \(p=1\) and \(q\to 1\), then (3.5) is reduced to (1.2).
Theorem 3.3
If f is a non-negative function, g is a positive function on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\), γ is a positive real number, \(r>1, 0\leq r-m<1-1/r\), and \((x-a+\gamma )/g(x)\) is non-increasing, then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
By Theorem 2.2(v), we have
By the assumption that the function \((x-a+\gamma )/g(x)\) is non-increasing and Theorem 2.2(v), we have
Hence, the inequality (3.6) is established. □
Remark 3.2
If \(p=1\), then (3.6) reduces to a generalization of q-Hardy inequality as
Theorem 3.4
If f is a positive function on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty ), r\geq 1\), and \(m>0\), then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
By Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
The inequality (3.8) is proved. □
Remark 3.3
If \(p=1\), then (3.8) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.9) reduces to an inequality, which appeared in [46].
Theorem 3.5
If f is a positive function on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty ), 0< r<1\), and \(m>0\), then
Proof
From Theorem 3.1, we get
By Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.4
If \(p=1\), then (3.10) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.11) reduces to an inequality, which appeared in [46].
Theorem 3.6
If \(f,g\) are positive functions on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\) such that g is non-decreasing, \(r\geq 1\), and \(m>0\), then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
By the assumption of the function g and Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
which finishes the proof. □
Remark 3.5
If \(p=1\), then (3.12) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.13) reduces to the generalization of (1.5), which appeared in [53].
Theorem 3.7
If \(f,g\) are positive functions on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\) such that g is non-decreasing, \(0< r<1\), and \(m>0\), then
Proof
From Theorem 3.1, we get
By the assumption of the function g and Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
The proof is accomplished. □
Remark 3.6
If \(p=1\), then (3.14) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.15) reduces to the generalization of (1.6), which appeared in [53].
Theorem 3.8
Let \(f,g\) be positive functions on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\), \(r\geq 1\), \(m>0\) and
If the function G is non-decreasing, then
Proof
From Theorem 2.3, we get
By the assumption of the function \(G(x)\), we have
By Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
which gives the required inequality. □
Remark 3.7
If \(p=1\), then (3.17) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.19) reduces to the generalization of (1.5).
Theorem 3.9
Let \(f,g\) be positive functions on \([a,b]\subseteq (0,\infty )\), \(0< r<1\), \(m>0\) and let \(G(x)\) be defined by (3.16). If the function G is non-decreasing, then
Proof
From Theorem 3.1, we get
By the assumption of the function \(G(x)\), we have
By Theorem 2.2(v), we obtain
provided the left and right sides are finite. □
Remark 3.8
If \(p=1\), then (3.20) reduces to
Also, if \(q\to 1\), then (3.22) reduces to the generalization of (1.6).
4 Examples
In the following, we will give examples to illustrate our main results.
Example 4.1
Define the continuous functions \(f,g: [1,3]\to {\mathbb{R}}\) by \(f(x)=x^{4}\) and \(g(x)=1/x\). Applying Theorem 3.1 with \(p=2/3\), \(q=1/3\), \(r=1/2\) and \(s=-1\), the left side of (3.1) becomes
For the right side of (3.1), one has
It is clear that \(73.65714286\geq 68.58503401\), which confirms the result described in Theorem 3.1.
Example 4.2
Define functions \(f,g:[1,3]\to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=x\) and \(g(x)=x-1/6\). Then f is non-negative function and g is a positive function on \([1,3]\). Applying Theorem 3.3 with \(p=1/2\), \(q=1/3\), \(r=m=2\) and \(\gamma =5/6\), the left side of (3.6) becomes
by Theorem 2.2(v).
For the right side of (3.6), one has
It is clear that \(21.82736842\leq 40.46697790\), which confirms the result described in Theorem 3.3.
5 Conclusion
In the present paper, we use \((p, q)\)-calculus to establish new integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities. Many existing results in the literature are reduced to special cases of our results when \(p=1\) and \(q\to 1\). The results of this paper are new and significantly contribute to the existing literature on the topic. In addition, we shall study these results in fractional \((p, q)\)-calculus and conformable fractional \((p, q)\)-calculus in the future.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Jackson, F.H.: On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 193–203 (1910)
Jackson, F.H.: q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 32, 305–314 (1910)
Kac, V., Cheung, P.: Quantum Calculus. Springer, New York (2002)
Bangerezako, G.: Variational calculus on q-nonuniform lattices. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 306, 161–179 (2005)
Exton, H.: q-Hypergeomatric Functions and Applications. Hastead Press, New York (1983)
Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K.: Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 282 (2013)
Annaby, M.H., Mansour, Z.S.: q-Fractional Calculus and Equations. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Ernst, T.: A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus. Springer, Basel (2012)
Ernst, T.: The history of q-calculus and a new method. UUDM Report 2000:16, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, (2000)
Noor, M.A., Awan, M.U., Noor, K.I.: Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 10, 1013–1018 (2016)
Aral, A., Gupta, V., Agarwal, R.P.: Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Gauchman, H.: Integral inequalities in q calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 47, 281–300 (2004)
Erden, S., Iftikhar, S., Kumam, P., Awan, M.U.: Some Newton’s like inequalities with applications. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 114, 195 (2020)
Erden, S., Budak, H., Sarikaya, M.Z., Iftikhar, S., Kumam, P.: Fractional Ostrowski type inequalities for bounded functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2020, 123 (2020)
Erden, S., Iftikhar, S., Delavar, M.R., Kumam, P., Thounthong, P., Kumam, W.: On generalizations of some inequalities for convex functions via quantum integrals. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 114, 110 (2020)
Iftikhar, S., Kumam, P., Erden, S.: Newton’s-type integral inequalities via local fractional integrals. Fractals 28, 3 (2020)
Sadjang, P.N.: On the fundamental theorem of \((p,q)\)-calculus and some \((p,q)\)-Taylor formulas. Results Math. 73, 1–21 (2013)
Tunç, M., Göv, E.: Some integral inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 95, 1–12 (2016)
Chakrabarti, R., Jagannathan, R.: A \((p,q)\)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 24, L711–L718 (1991)
Burban, I.M., Klimyk, A.U.: \((p,q)\)-differentiation, \((p,q)\)-integration and \((p,q)\)-hypergeometric functions related to quantum groups. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2, 15–36 (1994)
Hounkonnou, M.N., Kyemba, J.D.B.: \(R(p, q)\)-calculus: differentiation and integration. SUT J. Math. 49, 145–167 (2013)
Aral, A., Gupta, V.: Applications of \((p,q)\)-gamma function to Szasz Durrmeyer operators. Publ. Inst. Math. 102(116), 211–220 (2017)
Sahai, V., Yadav, S.: Representations of two parameter quantum algebras and \((p, q)\)-special functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335, 268–279 (2007)
Tunç, M., Göv, E.: \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 97, 1–13 (2016)
Tunç, M., Göv, E.: \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities for convex functions. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 98, 1–12 (2016)
Prabseang, J., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J.: \((p,q)\)-Hermite–Handamard inequalities for double integral and \((p,q)\)-differentiable convex function. Axioms 8(2), 68 (2019)
Kunt, M., Iscan, I., Alp, N., Sarikaya, M.Z.: \((p,q)\)-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities and \((p,q)\)-estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 112, 969–992 (2018)
Sadjang, P.N.: On the \((p, q) \)-Gamma and the \((p, q) \)-Beta functions. (2015). arXiv:1506.07394
Kalsoom, H., Amer, M., Junjua, M.D., Hassain, S., Shahzadi, G.: Some \((p,q)\)-estimates of Hermite–Hardamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi convex functions. Mathematics 7(8), 683 (2019)
Latif, M.A., Kunt, M., Dragomir, S.S., Iscan, I.: Post-quantum trapezoid type inequalities. AIMS Math. 5, 4011–4026 (2020)
Li, C., Yang, D., Bai, C.: Some Opial type inequalities in \((p,q)\)-calculus. AIMS Math. 5, 5893–5902 (2020)
Hardy, G.H.: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1967)
Skrzypczak, I.: Hardy-type inequalities derived from p-harmonic problems. Nonlinear Anal. 93, 30–50 (2013)
Dubinskii, Y.A.: A Hardy-type inequality and its applications. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 269, 106–126 (2010)
Bicheng, Y.: On Hardy’s inequality. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 234, 717–722 (1999)
Kufner, A., Maligranda, L., Persson, L.E.: The prehistory of the Hardy inequality. Am. Math. Mon. 113, 715–732 (2006)
Bougoffa, L.: On Minkowski and Hardy integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 7(2), 60 (2006)
Duy, N.T.: Some variants of the Hardy inequality. Appl. Anal. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036811.2020.1828370
Osekowski, A.: A new approach to Hardy-type inequalities. Arch. Math. 104, 165–176 (2015)
Maligranda, L., Oinarov, R., Persson, L.E.: On Hardy q-inequalities. Czechoslov. Math. J. 64, 659–682 (2014)
Persson, L.E., Shaimardan, S.: Some new Hardy-type inequalities for Riemann–Liouville fractional q-integral operator. J. Inequal. Appl. 296, 1–17 (2015)
Shaimardan, S.: Hardy-type inequalities for the fractional integral operator in q-analysis. Eurasian Math. J. 7, 84–99 (2016)
Baiarystanov, A.O., Persson, L.E., Shaimardan, S., Termirkhanova, A.: Some new Hardy-type inequalities in q-analysis. J. Math. Inequal. 3, 761–781 (2016)
Levinson, N.: Generalization of inequalities of Hardy. Duke Math. J. 31, 389–394 (1964)
Sulaiman, W.T.: Some Hardy type integral inequalities. Appl. Math. Lett. 25, 520–525 (2012)
Sroysang, B.: A generalization of some integral inequalities similar to Hardy’s inequality. Math. Æterna 3, 593–596 (2013)
Sroysang, B.: More on some Hardy type integral inequalities. J. Math. Inequal. 8, 497–501 (2014)
Khaled, M.: Some generalizations and refined Hardy type integral inequalities. Afr. Math. 28, 451–457 (2017)
Sulaiman, W.T.: Revesrses of Minkowski’s, Holder’s, and Hardy’s integral inequalities. Int. J. Mod. Math. Sci. 1, 4–24 (2012)
Saker, S.H., Mahmoud, R.R., Osman, M.M., Agarwal, R.P.: Some new generalized forms of Hardy’s type inequality on time scales. Math. Inequal. Appl. 20, 459–481 (2017)
Ajisope, M.O., Rauf, K.: On some refinements of Hardy-type integral inequalities. Int. J. Math. Comput. 14, 879–888 (2019)
Dahmani, Z., Khameli, A., Freha, K.: Further generalizations on some Hardy type RL-integral inequalities. J. Int. Math. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2020.1754543
Wu, S., Sroysang, B., Li, S.: A further generalization of certain integral inequalities similar to Hardy’s inequality. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 9, 1093–1102 (2018)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand, SAST and the Program Management Unit for Human Resources & Institutional Development, Research and Innovation [grant number B05F630104].
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to this article. They read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Thongjob, S., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J. et al. Generalizations of some integral inequalities related to Hardy type integral inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus. J Inequal Appl 2021, 105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02641-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02641-8
MSC
- 05A30
- 26D10
- 26D15
- 26A33
Keywords
- Hardy type integral inequalities
- \((p,q)\)-calculus
- \((p,q)\)-differentiable function
- \((p,q)\)-integrable function