- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Global structure of one-sign solutions for a simply supported beam equation
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2020, Article number: 112 (2020)
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the nonlinear eigenvalue problem
where \(h\in C([0,1], (0,\infty))\); \(f\in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})\) and \(sf(s)>0\) for \(s\neq0\), and \(f_{0}=f_{\infty}=0\), \(f_{0}=\lim_{|s|\rightarrow0}f(s)/s\), \(f_{\infty}=\lim_{|s|\rightarrow\infty}f(s)/s\). We investigate the global structure of one-sign solutions by using bifurcation techniques.
1 Introduction
The deformations of an elastic beam whose both end-points are simply supported are described by the fourth order problem
where \(h\in C([0,1], (0,\infty))\); \(f\in C(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})\) and \(sf(s)>0\) for \(s\neq0\).
Existence and multiplicity of positive solutions of (1.1) have been extensively studied by several authors, see [1, 2, 5–10, 13]. Cabada and Enguiça [2] developed the method of lower and upper solutions to show the existence and multiplicity of solutions, Jiang [6] and Li [7] proved the existence and multiplicity of solutions via the fixed point theorem in cone.
Bonanno and Di Bella [1] used variational method to obtain the following.
Theorem A
([1, Theorem 1.1])
Let\(f : \mathbb {R} \to\mathbb{R}\)be a continuous function. Assume that\(xf (x) > 0\)for all\(x \neq0\)and
Then, for every
the problem
has at least four nontrivial classical solutions.
In the present work, we attempt to give a direct and complete description of the global structure of one-sign solutions of (1.1) under the assumptions:
- (A1)
\(h: [0,1]\rightarrow (0,\infty)\) is continuous;
- (A2)
\(f\in C(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\) and \(sf(s)>0\) for \(|s|>0\);
- (A3)
\(f_{0}=0\);
- (A4)
\(f_{\infty}=0\).
Let \(Y= C[0,1]\) with the norm
We shall use Dancer’s bifurcation theorem and some properties of superior limit of certain infinity collection of connected sets to establish the following.
Theorem 1.1
Let (A1), (A2), (A3), and (A4) hold. Then there exist a connected component\(\mathcal{C}^{+}\subset\mathbb{R}^{+}\times C[0,1]\)of positive solutions of (1.1) and a connected component\(\mathcal{C}^{-}\subset \mathbb{R}^{+}\times C[0,1]\)of negative solutions of (1.1) such that
- (1)
\(\mathcal{C}^{+}\)is of ⊂-shaped and joins\((+\infty, \boldsymbol{0})\)to\((+\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\);
- (2)
for every\(\rho>0\), there exists\(\varLambda_{\rho}>0\)such that
$$(\lambda,u)\in\mathcal{C}^{+} \quad\textit{with } \Vert u \Vert _{\infty}=\rho\quad\Rightarrow \quad\lambda>\varLambda_{\rho}; $$ - (3)
\(\mathcal{C}^{-}\)is of ⊂-shaped and joins\((+\infty, \boldsymbol{0})\)to\((+\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\);
- (4)
for every\(\rho>0\), there exists\(\varLambda_{\rho}>0\)such that
$$(\lambda,u)\in\mathcal{C}^{-} \quad\textit{with } \Vert u \Vert _{\infty}=\rho\quad\Rightarrow\quad \lambda>\varLambda_{\rho}. $$
The linear problem
is equivalent to
where
Let
Then
Let
Corollary 1.1
Let (A1), (A2), (A3), and (A4) hold. Then (1.1) with\(h\equiv1\)has at least two positive solutions and at least two negative solutions (see Fig. 1) provided
where
For other related results on the existence and multiplicity of positive solutions and nodal solutions of fourth order problems, see Rynne [13] and Ma [8, 9].
The rest of the paper is arranged as follows: In Sect. 2, we prove some properties of superior limit of certain infinity collection of connected sets. In Sect. 3, we state and prove some properties for the one-sign solutions \((\lambda, u)\) of (1.1). Finally, in Sect. 4, we state and prove our main results.
2 Superior limit and component
Definition 2.1
([14])
Let X be a Banach space and \(\{C_{n} \mid n=1, 2, \ldots\}\) be a family of subsets of X. Then the superior limit\(\mathcal{D}\) of \(\{C_{n}\}\) is defined by
Definition 2.2
([14])
A component of a set M means a maximal connected subset of M.
Lemma 2.1
([14])
Suppose thatYis a compact metric space, AandBare non-intersecting closed subsets ofY, and no component ofYintersects bothAandB. Then there exist two disjoint compact subsets\(Y_{A}\)and\(Y_{B}\)such that\(Y=Y_{A}\cup Y_{B}\), \(A\subset Y_{A}\), \(B\subset Y_{B}\).
Lemma 2.2
([11])
LetXbe a Banach space and let\(\{C_{n}\}\)be a family of closed connected subsets ofX. Assume that
- (i)
there exist\(z_{n}\in C_{n}\), \(n=1, 2, \dots\), and\(z^{*}\in X\)such that\(z_{n}\rightarrow z^{*}\);
- (ii)
\(r_{n}=\sup\{\|x\| \mid x\in C_{n}\}= \infty\);
- (iii)
for every\(R>0\), \((\bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} C_{n} )\cap B_{R}\)is a relatively compact set ofX, where
$$B_{R}=\bigl\{ x\in X \mid \Vert x \Vert \leq R\bigr\} . $$
Then there exists an unbounded component\(\mathcal{C}\)in\(\mathcal{D}\)and\(z^{*}\in\mathcal{C}\).
Let \(E=\{u\in C^{3}[0,1]: u(0)=u(1)=u''(0)=u''(1)=0\}\) with the norm
It is well known that the linear eigenvalue problem
has an infinite sequence of simple eigenvalues
and the eigenfunction \(\phi_{k}\) corresponding to \(\mu_{k}\) has exactly \(k-1\) simple zeros in \((0, 1)\), see [13].
3 Some preliminary results
Let us define an operator \(T_{\lambda}:Y\to Y\) by
Lemma 3.1
Assume that (A1)–(A4) hold. Then\(T_{\lambda}: K\rightarrow K\)is completely continuous.
Lemma 3.2
Let\(\varOmega_{r}:=\{u\in K:\|u\|_{\infty}< r\}\). Let (A1)–(A4) hold. If\(u\in\partial \varOmega_{r}, r>0\), then
where\(\hat{M}_{r}=\max_{0\leq s\leq r}\{f(s)\}\).
Proof
Since \(f(u(t))\leq\hat{M}_{r}\) for \(t\in[0, 1]\), it follows that
 □
Lemma 3.3
Let (A1)–(A4) hold. Assume that\(\{(\mu_{k}, y_{k})\}\subset(0,+\infty)\times K \)is a sequence of positive solutions of (1.1). Assume that\(\mu_{k}\leq C_{0}\)for some constant\(C_{0}>0\), and
Then
Proof
Assume on the contrary that \(\{\|y_{k}\|_{\infty}\}\) is bounded. Then
for some constant M that is independent of k. Thus, it follows from the relation
that \(\{y''''_{k}\} \) is uniformly bounded in \(C[0,1]\), and subsequently \(\{y'''_{k}\} \) is uniformly bounded in \(C[0,1]\). However, this contradicts (3.2). □
Lemma 3.4
Assume that (A1)–(A4) hold. If\(u\in \partial\varOmega_{r}\), \(r>0\), then
where
Proof
Since \(f(u(t))\geq\hat{m}_{r}\) for \(t\in [\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4}]\), it follows that
 □
4 Proof of the main results
We only deal with the global behavior of positive solutions of (1.1). The global behavior of negative solutions of (1.1) can be treated by a similar method.
Let \(\varSigma^{+}\) be the closure of the set of positive solutions of (1.1) in E. To prove Theorem 1.1, we will develop a bifurcation approach to treat the case \(f_{0}=0\). Crucial to this approach is to construct a sequence of functions \(\{f^{[n]}\}\) that is asymptotic linear at 0 and satisfies
By means of the corresponding auxiliary equations, we obtain a sequence of unbounded components \(\{C^{[n]}_{+}\}\) via nonlinear Krein–Rutman bifurcation theorem, see Dancer [3] and Zeidler [15], and this enables us to find unbounded components ζ̂ satisfying
and joining \((+\infty,\boldsymbol{0})\) with \((+\infty,\boldsymbol{\infty})\).
Define \(g^{[n]}:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) by
Then \(g^{[n]}\in C(\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\) with
By (A3), it follows that
To apply the nonlinear Krein–Rutman theorem [4], let us consider the auxiliary family of the equations
Let \(\xi^{[n]}\in C(\mathbb{R})\) be such that
Then
Let \(D:=\{u\in C^{4}[0,1]: u(0)=u(1)=u''(0)=u''(1)=0\}\). Let \(L:D\to Y\) be the linear operator defined by
Let us consider
as a bifurcation problem from the trivial solution \(u\equiv0\).
Equation (4.7) can be converted to the equivalent equation
Further we note that \(\|L^{-1}[h(\cdot) \xi^{[n]}(u(\cdot))]\|_{\infty}=o(\|u\|_{\infty})\) for u near θ in E.
By the fact \((g^{[n]})_{0}>0\), the results of nonlinear Krein–Rutman theorem (see Dancer [3] and Zeidler [15, Corollary 15.12]) for (4.7) can be stated as follows: there exists a continuum \(C^{[n]}_{+}\) of positive solutions of (4.7) joining \((\frac{\lambda_{1}}{(g^{[n]})_{0}}, \theta )\) to infinity in \([0, \infty)\times K\). Moreover, \(C^{[n]}_{+} \setminus\{ (\frac {\lambda_{1}}{(g^{[n]})_{0}}, \theta )\}\subset ([0, \infty)\times\operatorname{int} K)\) and \((\frac{\lambda_{1}}{(g^{[n]})_{0}}, \theta )\) is the only positive bifurcation point of (4.7) lying on the trivial solutions line \(u\equiv\theta\).
Lemma 4.1
Let (A1)–(A4) hold. Then, for each fixedn, \(C^{[n]}_{+}\)joins\((\frac{\lambda_{1}}{(g^{[n]})_{0}}, \theta )\)to\((\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\)in\([0, \infty)\times K\).
Proof
We divide the proof into two steps.
Step 1. We show that \(\sup\{\lambda\mid(\lambda,u)\in C^{[n]}_{+} \} =\infty\).
Assume on the contrary that \(\sup\{\lambda\mid(\lambda,u)\in C^{[n]}_{+} \}=:c_{0} <\infty\). Let \(\{(\mu_{k}, y_{k})\}\subset C^{[n]}_{+} \) be such that
Then \(\|y_{k}\|_{\infty}\rightarrow\infty\). This together with the fact
implies that, for arbitrary \(\sigma\in(0,\frac{1}{2})\),
Since \((\mu_{k}, y_{k})\in C^{[n]}_{+}\), we have that
Set \(v_{k}(t)=\frac{y_{k}(t)}{\|y_{k}\|_{\infty}}\). Then
From (4.13) and the fact that \((g^{[n]})_{\infty}=0\), we conclude that
for some constant \(M>0\) independent of k.
Now, choosing a subsequence and relabeling if necessary, it follows that there exists \((\mu_{*},v_{*})\in[0,c_{0}]\times E\) with
such that
Notice that (4.13), (4.14) is equivalent to
Combining this with (4.16) and using (4.10) and the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we conclude that
This contradicts (4.15). Therefore
Step 2. We show that \(\sup\{\|u\|_{\infty}\mid(\lambda,u)\in C^{[n]}_{+} \} =\infty\).
Assume on the contrary that \(\sup\{\|u\|_{\infty}\mid(\lambda,u)\in C^{[n]}_{+} \}=:M_{\infty}<\infty\). Let \(\{(\mu_{k}, y_{k})\}\subset C^{[n]}_{+} \) be such that
Since \((\mu_{k}, y_{k})\in C^{[n]}_{+}\), for any \(t\in[\sigma, 1-\sigma]\), we have from (1.2) that
(where \(b_{*}:=\inf \{\frac{g^{[n]}(x)}{x} \mid x\in(0,M_{\infty}] \}>0\)), which yields that \(\{\mu_{k}\}\) is bounded. However, this contradicts (4.17).
Therefore, \(C^{[n]}_{+}\) joins \((\frac{\lambda_{1}}{(g^{[n]})_{0}}, \theta )\) to \((\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\) in K. □
Lemma 4.2
Let (A1)–(A4) hold and let\(I\subset (0,\infty)\)be a closed interval. Then there exists a positive constantMsuch that
Proof
Assume on the contrary that there exists a sequence \(\{(\mu_{k}, y_{k})\}\subset C^{[n]}_{+}\cap(I\times K)\) such that
Then, (4.9), (4.10), (4.11), and (4.12) hold. Set \(v_{k}(t)=\frac {y_{k}(t)}{\|y_{k}\|_{\infty}}\). Then
Now, choosing a subsequence and relabeling if necessary, it follows that there exists \((\mu_{*},v_{*})\in I\times Y\) with
such that
Moreover, from (4.11), (4.12), (4.10) and the assumption \(f_{\infty}=0\), it follows that
and subsequently, \(v_{*}(t)\equiv0\) for \(t\in[0,1]\). This contradicts (4.18). Therefore
 □
Lemma 4.3
Let (A1)–(A4) hold. Then there exists\(\rho^{*}>0\)such that
Proof
Assume on the contrary that there exists \(\{(\mu_{k}, y_{k})\}\subset ( \bigcup^{\infty}_{n=1} C^{[n]}_{+} )\cap ((0,+\infty)\times K ) \) such that \(\mu_{k}\rightarrow0\). Then
Set \(v_{k}(t)=\frac{y_{k}(t)}{\|y_{k}\|_{\infty}}\). Then
and for all \(t\in(0,1)\),
where \(B_{n}^{*}=\sup \{\frac{g^{[n]}(x)}{x}\mid x\in(0,\infty), n\in\mathbb{N} \}\). Let
Then \(B^{*}<\infty\), and
which contradicts the fact \(\|v_{k}\|_{\infty}=1\). Therefore, there exists \(\rho^{*}>0\), such that
 □
Proof of Theorem 1.1
By Lemmas 4.1–4.3 and the similar method to prove Ma and An [12, Theorem 4.1], with obvious changes, we may get a desired connected component \(\mathcal{C}^{+}\subset\limsup C^{[n]}_{+}\) of positive solutions of (1.1) and a connected component \(\mathcal{C}^{-}\subset\limsup C^{[n]}_{-}\) of negative solutions of (1.1) such that
- (1)
\(\mathcal{C}^{+}\) is of ⊂-shaped and joins \((+\infty, \theta )\) to \((+\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\);
- (2)
for every \(\rho>0\), there exists \(\varLambda_{\rho}>0\) such that
$$(\lambda,u)\in\mathcal{C}^{+} \quad\text{with } \Vert u \Vert _{\infty}=\rho\quad\Rightarrow\quad \lambda>\varLambda_{\rho}; $$ - (3)
\(\mathcal{C}^{-}\) is of ⊂-shaped and joins \((+\infty, \theta )\) to \((+\infty, \boldsymbol{\infty})\);
- (4)
for every \(\rho>0\), there exists \(\varLambda_{\rho}>0\) such that
$$(\lambda,u)\in\mathcal{C}^{-} \quad\text{with } \Vert u \Vert _{\infty}=\rho\quad\Rightarrow\quad \lambda>\varLambda_{\rho}. $$
 □
References
Bonanno, G., Di Bella, B.: A boundary value problem for fourth-order elastic beam equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 343, 1166–1176 (2008)
Cabada, A., Enguiça, R.R.: Positivity and lower and upper solutions for fourth order boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal. 67(5), 1599–1612 (2007)
Dancer, E.: Global solutions branches for positive maps. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 55, 207–213 (1974)
Deimling, K.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Springer, Berlin (1985)
Drábek, P., Holubová, G.: On the maximum and antimaximum principles for the beam equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 56, 29–33 (2016)
Jiang, D., Liu, H., Xu, X.: Nonresonant singular fourth-order boundary value problems. Appl. Math. Lett. 18(1), 69–75 (2005)
Li, Y.: On the existence of positive solutions for the bending elastic beam equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 189(1), 821–827 (2007)
Ma, R.: Existence of positive solutions of a fourth-order boundary value problem. Appl. Math. Comput. 168(2), 1219–1231 (2005)
Ma, R.: Nodal solutions of boundary value problems of fourth-order ordinary differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 319(2), 424–434 (2006)
Ma, R.: Nodal solutions for a fourth-order two-point boundary value problem. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 314(1), 254–265 (2006)
Ma, R., An, Y.: Global structure of positive solutions for superlinear second order m-point boundary value problems. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 34(2), 279–290 (2009)
Ma, R., An, Y.: Global structure of positive solutions for nonlocal boundary value problems involving integral conditions. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 4364–4376 (2009)
Rynne, B.P.: Infinitely many solutions of superlinear fourth order boundary value problems. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 19(2), 303–312 (2002)
Whyburn, G.T.: Topological Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1958)
Zeidler, E.: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications. Springer, New York (1986)
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to an anonymous referee for his or her very valuable suggestions.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11671322).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors claim that the research was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the last version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
All of the authors of this article claim that together they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Abbreviations
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yan, D., Ma, R. & Su, X. Global structure of one-sign solutions for a simply supported beam equation. J Inequal Appl 2020, 112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02376-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02376-y