Skip to main content

Approximation on a class of Szász–Mirakyan operators via second kind of beta operators

Abstract

In the present article, we construct a new sequence of positive linear operators via Dunkl analogue of modified Szász–Durrmeyer operators. We study the moments and basic results. Further, we investigate the pointwise approximation and uniform approximation results in various functional spaces for these sequences of positive linear operators. Finally, we prove the global approximation and A-statistical convergence results for these operators.

Introduction

In recent past, the Szász–Mirakjan operators and Szász–Durrmeyer type operators have been intensively investigated in various functional spaces to approximate the continuous functions and Lebesgue measurable functions respectively. Mazhar and Totik [17] gave an integral modification of Szász–Mirakyan [37] operators to study the Lebesgue measurable functions as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} S_{n}^{*}(g;u)=ne^{-nu}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }\frac{(nu)^{k}}{k!} \int _{0}^{\infty }e^{-nt}\frac{(nt)^{k}}{k!}g(t) \,dt,\quad u \geq 0, n\in \mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3,\dots \}. \end{aligned}$$
(1.1)

Researchers have obtained several approximations of Szász–Mirakyan type operators via Dunkl generalization; for instance, see [6, 18, 26, 28, 29, 32, 39]. Related to these results, more approximation results have been studied in different functional spaces (see [1, 2, 4, 5, 14, 38] and [3, 16, 27, 31]). Sucu [36] introduced Szász–Mirakyan type operators for \(k\in {\mathbb{N}}_{0}= \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\} \) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} S_{n}(g;u):=\frac{1}{e_{i}(nu)}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty }\frac{(nu)^{k}}{ \gamma _{i}(k)}g \biggl(\frac{k+2i\theta _{k}}{n} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(1.2)

using generalized exponential function [33] given by

$$\begin{aligned} e_{i}(t)=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty } \frac{t^{j}}{\gamma _{i}(j)},\quad t\in [0, \infty ), \end{aligned}$$
(1.3)

where the coefficients \(\gamma _{i}\) are defined as follows:

$$ \gamma _{i}(2j)=\frac{2^{2j}j!\varGamma (j+i+\frac{1}{2})}{\varGamma (i+ \frac{1}{2} )} \quad\text{and}\quad \gamma _{i}(2j+1)=2^{2j+1}j!\frac{ \varGamma (j+i+\frac{3}{2})}{\varGamma (i+\frac{1}{2} )}. $$

Here, Γ is the gamma function and \(i>-\frac{1}{2}\). In [36] the pointwise and uniform approximation results for the operators defined by (1.2) are obtained. Several extensions of the Szász–Mirakyan operators defined by (1.2) and their approximation results are studied by the authors viz İçöz et al. [11, 12]. In [40], we have constructed Szász–Durrmeyer type operators to approximate the Lebesgue measurable functions as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} D_{n}(g;u)=\frac{1}{e_{i}(nu)}\sum _{j=0}^{\infty }\frac{(nu)^{j}}{ \gamma _{i}(j)}\frac{n^{j+2i\theta _{j}+\lambda +1}}{\varGamma (j+2i\theta _{j}+\lambda +1)} \int _{0}^{\infty }t^{j+2i\theta _{j}+\lambda }e^{-nt}g(t) \,dt, \end{aligned}$$
(1.4)

where \(\varGamma (t)=\int _{0}^{\infty }u^{t}e^{-u}\,du\) is the gamma function, \(\lambda \geq 0\), and

$$ \theta _{j}= \textstyle\begin{cases} 0,&j\in 2{\mathbb{N}}, \\ 1,& j\in 2{\mathbb{N}}+1. \end{cases} $$

In order to obtain a better rate of convergence in comparison to (1.4), in this paper we introduce a modification with two nonnegative shifted nodes as follows:

$$ M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)= \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }\nu _{n}(u;k) \int _{0}^{\infty }t^{k+2i\theta _{k}+\lambda }e^{-nt}g \biggl(\frac{nt+ \alpha }{n+\beta } \biggr)\,dt, $$
(1.5)

where \(\nu _{n}(u;k)=\frac{1}{e_{i}(nu)} \frac{(nu)^{k}}{\gamma _{i}(k)}\frac{n^{k+2i\theta _{k}+\lambda +1}}{ \varGamma (k+2i\theta _{k}+\lambda +1)}\), \(0\leq \alpha \leq \beta \), and \(f\in C[0,\infty )\) whenever the above series converges. One can notice that (i) for \(i=\lambda =\alpha =\beta =0\), the sequence of operators introduced in (1.5) reduces to the operators defined in (1.1) and (ii) for \(\alpha =\beta =0\), the sequence of positive linear operators defined in (1.5) reduces to the operators defined in [40].

In the subsequent sections, we deduce some basic results, direct approximation results. Further, global approximation results are studied in [1921, 24, 25, 35].

Preliminary results

For \(i>-\frac{1}{2}, u \geq 0\), and \(n\in \mathbb{N}\), we denote

$$ E_{n}(u)=\frac{e_{i}(-nu)}{e_{i}(nu)}. $$
(2.1)

Lemma 2.1

([40])

For the operators given by (1.4), we have

$$\begin{aligned} &D_{n}(1;u)=1, \\ &D_{n}(t;u)=u+\frac{\lambda +1}{n}, \\ &D_{n}\bigl(t^{2};u\bigr)=u^{2}+ \bigl(4+2 \lambda +2iE_{n}(u) \bigr) \frac{u}{n}+\frac{(\lambda +1)(\lambda +2)}{n^{2}}, \\ &D_{n}\bigl(t^{3};u\bigr)=u^{3}+ \bigl(9+3 \lambda -2iE_{n}(u) \bigr)\frac{u ^{2}}{n}+ \bigl(18+3\lambda ( \lambda +5)+4i^{2} \\ &\phantom{D_{n}\bigl(t^{3};u\bigr)=}{}+2i(8+3\lambda )E_{n}(u) \bigr)\frac{u}{n^{2}}+ \frac{\lambda ^{3}+6 \lambda ^{2}+11\lambda +6}{n^{3}}, \\ &D_{n}\bigl(t^{4};u\bigr)=u^{4}+{\mathcal{O}} \biggl(\frac{1}{n} \biggr)\quad \textit{for each compact subset of } [0,\infty ). \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 2.2

For operators (1.5), we have

$$\begin{aligned} M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(t^{r};u\bigr)=\sum _{i=0}^{r}\binom{r}{i}\frac{n^{i} \alpha ^{r-i}}{(n+\beta )^{r}}D_{n} \bigl(t^{i};u\bigr),\quad r\in \mathbb{N}. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

From (1.5), we get

$$\begin{aligned} M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(t^{r};u\bigr) &= \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }\nu _{n}(u;t) \int _{0}^{\infty }t^{k+2i\theta _{k}+ \lambda }e^{-nt} \biggl( \frac{nt+\alpha }{n+\beta }-u \biggr)^{r} \\ &= \sum_{j=0}^{r}\binom{r}{j} \frac{n^{j}\alpha ^{r-j}}{(n+\beta )^{r}} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty }\nu _{n}(u;t) \int _{0}^{\infty }t^{k+2i\theta _{k}+ \lambda }e^{-nt}t^{j} \,dt \\ &=\sum_{j=0}^{r}\binom{r}{j} \frac{n^{j}\alpha ^{r-j}}{(n+\beta )^{r}}D_{n}\bigl(t^{j};u\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

 □

Lemma 2.3

For\(r\in \mathbb{N}\), we have the following relation:

$$\begin{aligned} M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl((t-u)^{r};u\bigr)=\sum _{i=0}^{r}\binom{r}{i}(-u)^{r-i}M _{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(t^{i};u\bigr), \end{aligned}$$

where\(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\)is defined in (1.5).

Proof

From relation (1.5), we get

$$\begin{aligned} M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl((t-u)^{r};u\bigr) &= \sum _{k=0}^{\infty }\nu _{n}(u;k) \int _{0}^{\infty }t^{k+2i\theta _{k}+ \lambda }e^{-nt} \biggl( \frac{nt+\alpha }{n+\beta }-u \biggr)^{r}\,dt \\ &= \sum_{j=0}^{r}\binom{r}{j}(-u)^{r-j}M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \bigl(t^{j};u\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

 □

Lemma 2.4

Let\(e_{r}(t)=t^{r}\)for\(r\in \{0,1,2,3,4\}\)be the test functions and\(E_{n}(u)\)be defined in (2.1). Then

$$\begin{aligned} &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{0};u)=1, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)=\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+ \frac{\lambda + \alpha +1}{n+\beta }, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)=\frac{n^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{2}}u^{2}+ \bigl(4+2\lambda +2\alpha +2iE_{n}(u) \bigr)\frac{n}{(n+\beta )^{2}}u \\ &\phantom{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)=}{}+ \frac{(\lambda +1)(\lambda +2\alpha +2)+\alpha ^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{2}}, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{3};u)=\frac{n^{3}}{(n+\beta )^{3}}u^{3}+ \bigl(9+3\alpha +3\lambda -2iE_{n}(u) \bigr) \frac{n^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{3}}u^{2} \\ &\phantom{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{3};u)=}{}+ \bigl(18 + 12\alpha + 3\lambda (\lambda + 5 + 2\alpha ) + 3\alpha ^{2} + 4i^{2} + 2i(8+ 3\lambda + 3\alpha )E_{n}(u) \bigr) \\ &\phantom{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{3};u)=}{}\times \frac{n}{(n + \beta )^{3}}u + \frac{\lambda ^{3} + \alpha ^{3} + \lambda ^{2}(6+3\alpha ) + \lambda (11 + 9\alpha + 3\alpha ^{2}) + 6 + 6\alpha + 3\alpha ^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{3}}, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{4};u) =\frac{n^{4}}{(n+\beta )^{4}}u^{4}+ {\mathcal{O}} \biggl(\frac{1}{n+\beta } \biggr) \quad\textit{for each compact subset of } [0,\infty ). \end{aligned}$$

Proof

The proof follows immediately from Lemma 2.2. □

Lemma 2.5

Let\(\psi _{u}^{r}(t)=(t-u)^{r}\), \(r\in {\mathbb{N}}\), be the central moments of\(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\). Then

$$\begin{aligned} &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi _{u}^{0};u\bigr) =1, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi _{u}^{1};u\bigr) =\frac{1}{(n+\beta )}(1+ \lambda +\alpha -\beta u), \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi _{u}^{2};u\bigr) = \frac{\beta ^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{2}}u^{2}+2 \biggl(1+iE_{n}(u)-2\beta \frac{1+ \lambda +\alpha }{n} \biggr)\frac{n}{(n+\beta )^{2}}u \\ &\phantom{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi _{u}^{2};u\bigr) = }{}+ \frac{\alpha ^{2}+(\lambda +1)(\lambda +2\alpha +2)}{(n+\beta )^{2}}, \\ &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi _{u}^{4};u\bigr) ={\mathcal{O}} \bigl((n+\beta )^{-1} \bigr)\quad \textit{for each compact subset of } [0,\infty ). \end{aligned}$$

Proof

In the light of Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3, we can easily prove Lemma 2.5. □

Definition 2.6

Let \(g\in C[0,\infty )\). Then the modulus of continuity for a uniformly continuous function g is defined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \omega (g;\delta )=\sup_{ \vert t_{1}-t_{2} \vert \leq \delta } \bigl\vert g(t_{1})-g(t_{2}) \bigr\vert ,\quad t_{1},t_{2} \in [0,\infty ). \end{aligned}$$

For a uniformly continuous function g in \(C[0,\infty )\) and \(\delta >0\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert g(t_{1})-g(t_{2}) \bigr\vert \leq \biggl(1+\frac{(t_{1}-t_{2})^{2}}{\delta ^{2}} \biggr)\omega (g;\delta ). \end{aligned}$$
(2.2)

Theorem 2.7

Let\(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\)be the operators defined by (1.5) and\(g\in C[0,\infty )\cap \{g: u\geq 0, \frac{g(u)}{1+u^{2}}\textit{ is convergent as }u\rightarrow \infty \}\). Then the operators are defined by (1.5), \(M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\rightrightarrows g\)on each compact subset of\([0,\infty )\), where stands for uniform convergence.

Proof

For the proof of uniformity for the operators \(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\), we use the well-known Korovkin theorem. So, it is sufficient to show that

$$\begin{aligned} M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{\nu };u)\rightarrow e_{\nu }(u) \quad\text{for } \nu =0,1,2. \end{aligned}$$

Using Lemma 2.4, it is obvious that \(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e _{\nu };u)\rightarrow e_{\nu }(u)\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \), \(\nu =0,1,2\), which proves Theorem 2.7. □

Theorem 2.8

(See [34])

Let\(L:C([a,b])\rightarrow B([a,b])\)be a linear and positive operator, and let\(\varphi _{x}\)be the function defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \varphi _{x}(t)= \vert t-x \vert , \quad(x,t)\in [a,b]\times [a,b]. \end{aligned}$$

If\(f\in C_{B}([a,b])\)for any\(x\in [a,b]\)and any\(\delta >0\), the operatorLverifies

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert (Lf) (x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq{}& \bigl\vert f(x) \bigr\vert \bigl\vert (Le_{0}) (x)-1 \bigr\vert \\ &{}+\Bigl\{ (Le_{0}) (x)+\delta ^{-1}\sqrt {(Le_{0}) (x) \bigl(L\varphi _{x}^{2} \bigr) (x)} \Bigr\} \omega _{f}(\delta ), \end{aligned}$$

where\(C[a,b]\)is the space of all continuous functions defined on\([a,b]\), and\(C_{B}[a,b]\)is the space of all continuous and bounded functions defined on\([a,b]\).

Theorem 2.9

For the operators\(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\)given by (1.5) and\(g\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq 2\omega (g;\delta ), \end{aligned}$$

where\(\delta =\sqrt{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(\psi _{u}^{2};u)}\)and\(C_{B}[0,\infty )\)is the space of continuous and bounded functions defined on\([0,\infty )\).

Proof

Using Lemma 2.4, Lemma 2.5, and Theorem 2.8, we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq \Bigl\{ 1+\delta ^{-1}\sqrt{M_{n} ^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl( \psi _{u}^{2};u\bigr)}\Bigr\} \omega (g;\delta ). \end{aligned}$$

On taking \(\delta =\sqrt{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(\psi _{u}^{2};u)}\), we arrive at the required result. □

Direct results

Let us equip the norm on g such as \(\|g\|=\sup_{0\leq u< \infty }|g(u)|\). For any \(g\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\) and \(\delta >0\), Peetre’s K-functional is defined as follows:

$$ K_{2}(g,\delta )=\inf \bigl\{ \Vert g-h \Vert + \delta \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert : h\in C_{B}^{2}[0, \infty )\bigr\} , $$
(3.1)

where \(C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )=\{h\in C_{B}[0,\infty ):h', h''\in C_{B}[0, \infty )\}\). From DeVore and Lorentz ([8], p.177, Theorem 2.4), there exists an absolute constant \(C>0\) in such a way that

$$\begin{aligned} K_{2}(g;\delta )\leq C\omega _{2}(g;\sqrt{\delta }). \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 3.1

Let the auxiliary operators be

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)=M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)+g(u)-g \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta } \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(3.2)

For\(h, g\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\), \(u\geq 0\), and\(\mu,\lambda \geq 0\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq \xi _{n}^{u} \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert , \end{aligned}$$

where

$$\begin{aligned} \xi _{n}^{u}=M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \bigl(\psi _{u}^{2};u\bigr)+ \bigl(M_{n}^{ \alpha,\beta } \bigl(\psi _{u}^{1};u\bigr) \bigr)^{2}. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

From (3.2), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(1;u)=1,\qquad \widehat{M}_{n} ^{\alpha,\beta }(\psi _{u};u)=0\quad \text{and}\quad \bigl\vert \widehat{M}_{n}^{ \alpha,\beta }(g;u) \bigr\vert \leq 3 \Vert g \Vert . \end{aligned}$$
(3.3)

From Taylor’s series for \(h\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} h(t)=h(u)+(t-u)h'(u)+ \int _{u}^{t} (t-v)h''(v) \,dv. \end{aligned}$$
(3.4)

Using \(\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)\) in (3.4), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)=h'(u) \widehat{M}_{n}^{ \alpha,\beta }(t-u;u)+\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \biggl( \int _{u}^{t}(t-v)h''(v) \,dv;u \biggr). \end{aligned}$$

From (3.2) and (3.3), we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)=\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \biggl( \int _{u}^{t}(t-v)h''(v) \,dv;u \biggr) \\ &\phantom{\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)}=M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \biggl( \int _{u}^{t}(t-v)h''(v) \,dv;u \biggr) \\ &\phantom{\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)=}{}- \int _{u}^{\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta }} \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+ \frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta }-v \biggr)g''(v)\,dv, \\ &\bigl\vert \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u) \bigr\vert \\ &\quad \leq \biggl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha ,\beta } \biggl( \int _{u}^{t}(t-v)h''(v) \,dv;u \biggr) \biggr\vert \\ &\qquad{}+ \biggl\vert \int _{u}^{\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+ \beta }} \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+ \frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta }-v \biggr)h''(v)\,dv \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$
(3.5)

Since

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \int _{u}^{t} (t-v)h''(v) \,dv \biggr\vert \leq (t-v)^{2} \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert , \end{aligned}$$
(3.6)

we get

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \int _{u}^{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)} \bigl(M_{n}^{\alpha ,\beta }(e_{1};u)-v \bigr)h''(v)\,dv \biggr\vert \leq \bigl(M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }(t-v;u) \bigr)^{2} \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert . \end{aligned}$$
(3.7)

Combining (3.5), (3.6), and (3.7), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)|\leq \xi _{n}^{u} \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert . \end{aligned}$$

 □

Theorem 3.2

Let\(f\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\). Then there exists a constant\(C>0\)such that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl| M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u)\bigr| \leq C\omega _{2} \biggl(g; \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\xi _{n}^{u}} \biggr)+\omega (g; M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }(\psi _{u};u), \end{aligned}$$

where\(\xi _{n}^{u}\)is defined in Lemma 3.1.

Proof

For \(h\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\) and \(g\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\) and by the definition of \(\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq {}&\bigl\vert \widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }(g-h;u) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert (g-h) (u) \bigr\vert +\bigl|\widehat{M}_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u)) \bigr| \\ &{}+\biggl\vert g \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta } \biggr)-g(u) \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$

From Lemma 3.1 and relations in (3.3), one gets

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq{}& 4 \Vert g-h \Vert + \bigl\vert \widehat{M}_{n} ^{\alpha,\beta }(h;u)-h(u) \bigr\vert \\ &{}+ \biggl\vert g \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta }u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+ \beta } \biggr)-g(u) \biggr\vert \\ \leq{}& 4 \Vert g-h \Vert +\xi _{n}^{u} \bigl\Vert h'' \bigr\Vert +\omega \bigl(g;M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }( \psi _{u};u) \bigr). \end{aligned}$$

Using the definition of Peetre’s K-functional, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq C\omega _{2} \biggl(g; \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\xi _{n}^{u}} \biggr)+\omega (g;M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }({ \psi _{u}};u). \end{aligned}$$

This completes the proof of Theorem 3.2. □

We consider the Lipschitz type space [30]:

$$\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Lip}_{M}^{k_{1},k_{2}}(\rho ):= \biggl\{ g \in C _{B}[0,\infty ): \bigl\vert g(t) - g(u) \bigr\vert \leq M \frac{ \vert t - u \vert ^{\rho }}{(t + k_{1}u + k_{2}u^{2})^{\frac{\rho }{2}}}:u,t\in (0,\infty ) \biggr\} , \end{aligned}$$

where \(M\geq 0\) is a constant, \(k_{1},k_{2}>0\), \(\rho >0\), and \(\rho \in (0, 1]\).

Theorem 3.3

For\(g\in \operatorname{Lip}_{M}^{k_{1},k_{2}}(\rho )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq M \biggl(\frac{\eta _{n}^{*}(u)}{k _{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}} \biggr)^{\frac{\rho }{2}}, \end{aligned}$$
(3.8)

where\(u>0\)and\(\eta _{n}^{*}(u)=M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(\psi _{u}^{2};u)\).

Proof

For \(\rho =1\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert &\leq M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }{\bigl( \bigl\vert g(t)-g(u) \bigr\vert \bigr)}(u) \\ &\leq M M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \biggl(\frac{ \vert t-u \vert }{(t+k_{1}u+k_{2}u ^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}}};u \biggr). \end{aligned}$$

Since \(\frac{1}{t+k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}}<\frac{1}{k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}}\) for all \(t,u\in (0,\infty )\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert &\leq \frac{M}{(k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2})^{ \frac{1}{2}}} \bigl(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl((t-u)^{2};x \bigr)\bigr)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\ &\leq M \biggl(\frac{\eta _{n}^{*}(u)}{k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}} \biggr)^{ \frac{1}{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

Thus Theorem 3.3 holds for \(\rho =1\). Next, for \(\rho \in (0,1)\) and from Hölder’s inequality with \(p=\frac{2}{ \rho }\) and \(q=\frac{2}{2-\rho }\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert &\leq \bigl(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\bigl( \bigl\vert g(t)-g(u) \bigr\vert \bigr)^{\frac{2}{ \rho }};u\bigr) \bigr)^{\frac{\rho }{2}} \\ &\leq M \biggl(M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \biggl(\frac{ \vert t-u \vert ^{2}}{(t+k_{1}u+k _{2}u^{2})};u \biggr) \biggr)^{\frac{\rho }{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

Since \(\frac{1}{t+k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}}<\frac{1}{k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}}\) for all \(t,u\in (0,\infty )\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert &\leq M \biggl(\frac{M_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } ( \vert t-u \vert ^{2};u )}{k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}} \biggr)^{\frac{ \rho }{2}} \\ &\leq M \biggl(\frac{\eta _{n}^{*}(u)}{k_{1}u+k_{2}u^{2}} \biggr)^{\frac{ \rho }{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

Hence, we prove Theorem 3.3. □

Global approximation

From [10], we recall some notation to prove the global approximation results.

For the weight function \(1+u^{2}\) and \(0\leq u<\infty \), we have

$$ B_{1+u^{2}}[0,\infty )=\bigl\{ f(u): \bigl\vert f(u) \bigr\vert \leq M_{f} \bigl(1+u^{2}\bigr)\bigr\} , $$
(4.1)

where \(M_{f}\) is a constant depending on f and \(C_{1+u^{2}}[0, \infty )\subset B_{1+u^{2}}[0,\infty )\) is a space of continuous functions equipped with the norm \(\|f\|_{1+u^{2}}=\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{|f|}{1+u^{2}}\).

Denote

$$ C_{1+u^{2}}^{k}[0,\infty )=\biggl\{ f\in C_{1+u^{2}}: \lim_{u\rightarrow \infty }\frac{f(u)}{1+u^{2}}=k, \text{ where } k \text{ is a constant}\biggr\} . $$
(4.2)

Theorem 4.1

Let the operators be defined by (1.5) acting from\(C_{{1+u^{2}}} ^{k}[0,\infty )\)to\(B_{1+u^{2}}[0,\infty )\). Then, for every\(f\in C_{{1+u^{2}}}^{k}[0,\infty )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0, \end{aligned}$$

where\(B_{1+u^{2}}\)and\(C_{1+u^{2}}^{k}\)are defined in (4.1) and (4.2).

Proof

To prove this result, it is sufficient to show that

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{i};u)-u ^{i} \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0,\quad i=0,1,2. \end{aligned}$$

Using Lemma 2.4, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{0};u)-u^{0} \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{ \vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(1;u)-1 \vert }{1+u ^{2}}=0 \quad\text{for }i=0. \end{aligned}$$

For \(i=1\),

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u) - u \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}} & = \sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{ (\frac{n}{n+\beta }-1 )u+\frac{ \lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta }}{1+u^{2}} \\ & = \biggl(\frac{n}{n+\beta } - 1 \biggr)\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )} \frac{u}{1 + u^{2}} + \frac{\lambda + \alpha + 1}{n+\beta }\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )} \frac{1}{1+u ^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

This shows that \(\|M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)-u\|_{1+u^{2}} \rightarrow 0\), \(n\rightarrow \infty \). For \(i=2\),

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)-u^{2} \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}={}&\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{ \vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)-u ^{2} \vert }{1+u^{2}} \\ \leq{}& \biggl(\frac{n^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{2}}-1 \biggr)\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )} \frac{u^{2}}{1+u^{2}} \\ &{}+ \bigl(4+2\lambda +2\alpha +2iE_{n}(u) \bigr) \frac{n}{(n+\beta )^{2}} \sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{u}{1+u ^{2}} \\ &{}+ \frac{(\lambda +1)(\lambda +2\alpha +2)+\alpha ^{2}}{(n+\beta )^{2}} \sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{1}{1+u^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$

which shows that \(\|M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)-u^{2}\|_{1+u^{2}} \rightarrow 0\), \(n\rightarrow \infty \). □

Let \(f\in C_{\rho }^{k}[0,\infty )\), Yüksel and Ispir [41] introduced the weighted modulus of continuity as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \varOmega (g;\delta )=\sup_{u\in [0,\infty ),0< h\leq \delta } \frac{ \vert g(u+h)-g(u) \vert }{1+(u+h)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 4.2

([41])

Let\(f\in C_{1+x^{2}}^{k}[0,\infty )\). Then

  1. (i)

    \(\varOmega (f;\delta )\)is a monotone increasing function ofδ;

  2. (ii)

    \(\lim_{\delta \rightarrow 0^{+}}\varOmega (f;\delta )=0\);

  3. (iii)

    for each\(\lambda \in [0,\infty )\), \(\varOmega (f;\lambda \delta ) \leq (1+\lambda )(1+\delta ^{2})\varOmega (f;\delta )\).

For\(t,x\in [0,\infty )\), one gets

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq 2 \biggl(1+ \frac{ \vert t-x \vert }{\delta } \biggr) \bigl(1+\delta ^{2} \bigr) \bigl(1+x^{2}\bigr) \bigl(1+(t-x)^{2} \bigr)\varOmega (f;\delta ). \end{aligned}$$
(4.3)

Theorem 4.3

Let\(g\in C_{1+u^{2}}^{k}[0,\infty )\). Then we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{ \vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(x) \vert }{(1+u ^{2})^{3}}\leq C(n) \biggl(1+ \frac{1}{n+\beta } \biggr)\varOmega \biggl(g;\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+ \beta }} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$

where\(C(n)=1+\frac{C_{1}}{n+\beta }\cdot \frac{3\sqrt{(}3)}{16}+\frac{\sqrt{C _{1}}}{2}+\frac{1}{4}\sqrt{\frac{C_{1}C_{2}}{n+\beta }}\)and\(C_{1}, C_{2}\in (0,\infty )\).

Proof

Using (4.3) and \(x,t\in (0,\infty )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \leq{}& 2 \biggl(1+\frac{M_{n}^{\alpha ,\beta }( \vert t-u \vert ;u)}{\delta } \biggr) \bigl(1+\delta ^{2} \bigr) \bigl(1+u ^{2}\bigr) \\ &{}\times \bigl(1+M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl((t-u)^{2};u \bigr) \bigr)\varOmega (g; \delta ). \end{aligned}$$
(4.4)

Applying the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for (4.4), we get

$$\begin{aligned} & \bigl\vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g(u) \bigr\vert \\ &\quad \leq 2 \bigl(1+\delta ^{2} \bigr) \bigl(1+u ^{2}\bigr)\varOmega (g;\delta ) \biggl(1+M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \bigl((t-u)^{2};u\bigr) \\ &\qquad{}+\frac{\sqrt{M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }((t-u)^{2};u)}}{\delta }+\frac{\sqrt{M _{n}^{\alpha,\beta }((t-u)^{2};u)M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }((t-u)^{4};u)}}{ \delta } \biggr). \end{aligned}$$
(4.5)

By elementary calculations, we get

$$\begin{aligned} & \lim_{n\to \infty }(n+\beta )M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \bigl( \psi _{u} ^{2};u \bigr)=2(1+i)u; \\ & \lim_{n\to \infty }(n+\beta )M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta } \bigl( \psi _{u} ^{4};u \bigr)=3(8i+1)u^{3}. \end{aligned}$$

It follows that, for each fixed point \(u>0\), there exists \(N_{u} \in \mathbb{N}\) such that, for all \(n>N_{u}\),

$$\begin{aligned} & M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi ^{2};u\bigr) \leq C_{1}\frac{u}{n+\beta }, \end{aligned}$$
(4.6)
$$\begin{aligned} &M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }\bigl(\psi ^{4};u\bigr)\leq C_{2}\frac{u^{3}}{n+\beta }, \end{aligned}$$
(4.7)

where \(C_{1},C_{2}\in (0,\infty )\). From (4.5)–(4.7) and choosing \(\delta =\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+ \beta }}\), we get the required result. □

A-statistical convergence

From [7, 15] we first introduce convergence approximation theorems in operators theory. Here, we recall same notation from [7, 15]. Let \(A=(a_{nk})\) be a nonnegative infinite summability matrix. For a given sequence \(x:=(x_{k})\), the A-transform of x denoted by \(Ax:((Ax)_{n})\) is defined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} (Ax)_{n}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty }a_{nk}x_{k}, \end{aligned}$$

provided the series converges for each n. A is said to be regular if \(\lim (Ax)_{n}=L\) whenever \(\lim x=L\). Then \(x=(x_{n})\) is said to be an A-statistical convergence to L i.e. \(st_{A}-\lim \)\(x=L\) if, for every \(\epsilon >0\), \(\lim_{n}\sum_{k:|x_{k}-L|\geq \epsilon }a_{nk}=0\). In addition, A-statistical convergence results are studied in [13, 22, 23].

Theorem 5.1

Let\(A=(a_{nk})\)be a nonnegative regular summability matrix and\(x\geq 0\). Then we have

$$\begin{aligned} st_{A}-\lim_{n} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(g;u)-g \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0\quad \textit{for all }g\in C_{1+u^{2}}^{k}[0, \infty ). \end{aligned}$$

Proof

From ([9], p. 191, Th. 3), it is sufficient to show that, for \(\lambda _{1}=0\),

$$\begin{aligned} st_{A}-\lim_{n} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{i};u)-e_{i} \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0 \quad\text{for } i\in \{0,1,2\}. \end{aligned}$$
(5.1)

Using Lemma 2.4, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)-u \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}} &=\sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{1}{1+u^{2}} \biggl\vert \biggl(\frac{n}{n+ \beta }-1 \biggr)u+\frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta } \biggr\vert \\ &\leq \biggl\vert \frac{n}{n+\beta } - 1 \biggr\vert \sup _{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{u}{1+u^{2}} + \biggl\vert \frac{\lambda + \alpha + 1}{n+\beta } \biggr\vert \sup_{u\in [0,\infty )}\frac{1}{1+u ^{2}} \\ &\leq \frac{1}{2} \biggl\vert \frac{n}{n+\beta } - 1 \biggr\vert + \biggl\vert \frac{ \lambda + \alpha + 1}{n+\beta } \biggr\vert . \end{aligned}$$

We have

$$ st_{A}- \lim_{n}\frac{1}{2} \biggl\vert \frac{n}{n+\beta } - 1 \biggr\vert =st_{A}- \lim _{n} \biggl\vert \frac{\lambda + \alpha + 1}{n+ \beta } \biggr\vert =0. $$
(5.2)

Now, for given \(\epsilon >0\), we define the following sets:

$$\begin{aligned} &J_{1}:= \bigl\{ n: \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)-u \bigr\Vert \geq \epsilon \bigr\} , \\ &J_{2}:= \biggl\{ n:\frac{1}{2} \biggl\vert \frac{n}{n+\beta }-1 \biggr\vert \geq \frac{\epsilon }{2} \biggr\} , \\ &J_{3}:= \biggl\{ n: \biggl\vert \frac{\lambda +\alpha +1}{n+\beta } \biggr\vert \geq \frac{\epsilon }{2} \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$

This implies that \(J_{1}\subseteq J_{2}\cup J_{3}\), which shows that \(\sum_{k_{1}\in J_{1}}a_{nk_{1}}\leq \sum_{k_{1}\in J_{2}}a_{nk}+ \sum_{k_{1}\in J_{3}}a_{nk}\). Hence, from (5.2) we get

$$\begin{aligned} st_{A}-\lim_{n} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{1};u)-u \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0. \end{aligned}$$
(5.3)

In a similar way the following can be proved:

$$\begin{aligned} st_{A}-\lim_{n} \bigl\Vert M_{n}^{\alpha,\beta }(e_{2};u)-u^{2} \bigr\Vert _{1+u^{2}}=0. \end{aligned}$$
(5.4)

This completes the proof of Theorem 5.1. □

Conclusion

The motive of the present paper is to give a generalized error estimation of convergence by modification of Szász–Mirakyan integral operators via Dunkl analogue. We have defined the Szász–Mirakyan integral operators based on Dunkl analogue with the aid of two nonnegative parameters \(0\leq \alpha \leq \beta \). This type of modification enables us to give a generalied error estimation for a certain function in comparison to the Szász–Mirakyan integral operators based on Dunkl analogue. We investigated some approximation results by means of the well-known Korovkin type theorem. We have also calculated the rate of convergence of operators by means of Peetre’s K-functional and second order modulus of continuity. Lastly, we studied the global approximation results.

References

  1. 1.

    Acar, T., Aral, A., Mohiuddine, S.A.: Approximation by bivariate \((p,q)\)-Bernstein Kantorovich operators. Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Trans. A, Sci. 42(2), 655–662 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Acar, T., Aral, A., Mursaleen, M.: Approximation by Baskakov–Durrmeyer operators based on \((p,q)\)-integers. Math. Slovaca 68(4), 897–906 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Acar, T., Aral, A., Raşa, I.: Positive linear operators preserving τ and \(\tau ^{2}\). Constr. Math. Anal. 2(3), 98–102 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Acar, T., Mohiuddine, S.A., Mursaleen, M.: Approximation by \((p,q)\)-Baskakov–Durrmeyer–Stancu operators. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 12(6), 1453–1468 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Acar, T., Mursaleen, M., Mohiuddine, S.A.: Stancu type \((p,q)\)-Szász—Mirakyan–Baskakov operators. Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Sér. A1 67(1), 116–128 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alotaibi, A., Nasiruzzaman, M., Mursaleen, M.: A Dunkl type generalization of Szász operators via post-quantum calculus. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, Article ID 287 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Connor, J.S.: On strong matrix summability with respect to a modulus and statistical convergence. Can. Math. Bull. 32, 194–198 (1989)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    DeVore, R.A., Lorentz, G.G.: Constructive Approximation. Grudlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Duman, O., Orhan, C.: Statistical approximation by positive linear operators. Studio Math. 16(2), 187–197 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gadziev, A.D.: Theorems of the type of P.P. Korovkin’s theorems. Mat. Zametki 20(5), 781–786 (1976) (in Russian) (1976), Math. Notes 20(5-6), 995–998 (Engl. Trans.) (1976)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    İçöz, G., Çekim, B.: Dunkl generalization of Szász operators via q-calculus. J. Inequal. Appl. 284, Article ID 11 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    İçöz, G., Çekim, B.: Stancu-type generalization of Dunkl analogue of Szász–Kantorovich operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39, 7 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3602

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kadak, U., Mohiuddine, S.A.: Generalized statistically almost convergence based on the difference operator which includes the \((p,q)\)-gamma function and related approximation theorems. Results Math. 73(1), Article ID 9 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kajla, A., Acar, T.: A new modification of Durrmeyer type mixed hybrid operators. Carpath. J. Math. 34(1), 47–56 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kolk, E.: Matrix summability of statistically convergent sequences. Analysis 13, 77–83 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Krech, G., Krech, I.: On some bivariate Gauss–Weierstrass operators. Constr. Math. Anal. 2(2), 57–63 (2019)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mazhar, S.M., Totik, V.: Approximation by modified Szász operators. Acta Sci. Math. 49(1–4), 257–269 (1985)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Milovanovic, G.V., Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M.: Modified Stancu type Dunkl generalization of Szász–Kantorovich operators. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 112, 135–151 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Acar, T, Alghamdi, M.A.: Genuine modified Bernstein–Durrmeyer operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, Article ID 104 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Acar, T., Alotaibi, A.: Construction of a new family of Bernstein–Kantorovich operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40, 7749–7759 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Acar, T., Alotaibi, A.: Durrmeyer type \((p,q)\)-Baskakov operators preserving linear functions. J. Math. Inequal. 12, 961–973 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Alamri, B.A.S.: Generalization of equi-statistical convergence via weighted lacunary sequence with associated Korovkin and Voronovskaya type approximation theorems. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 113(3), 1955–1973 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Asiri, A., Hazarika, B.: Weighted statistical convergence through di fference operator of sequences of fuzzy numbers with application to fuzzy approximation theorems. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 48(5), 492–506 (2019)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Hazarika, B., Alghamdi, M.A.: Ideal relatively uniform convergence with Korovkin and Voronovskaya types approximation theorems. Filomat 33(14), 4549–4560 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mohiuddine, S.A., Özger, F.: Approximation of functions by Stancu variant of Bernstein–Kantorovich operators based on shape parameter α. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 114, Article ID 70 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M.: Dunkl generalization of Kantorovich type Szasz–Mirakjan operators via q- calculus. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 10(4), Article ID 1750077 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M.: Approximation of modified Jakimovski–Leviatan-beta type operators. Constr. Math. Anal. 1(2), 88–98 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M., Alotaibi, A.: On modified Dunkl generalization of Szasz operators via q-calculus. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, Article ID 38 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nasiruzzaman, M., Rao, N.: A generalized Dunkl type modifications of Phillips-operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, Article ID 323 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Özarslan, M.A., Aktuğlu, H.: Local approximation for certain King type operators. Filomat 27, 173–181 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ozsarac, F., Acar, T.: Reconstruction of Baskakov operators preserving some exponential functions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 42(16), 5124–5132 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Rao, N., Wafi, A., Acu, A.M.: q-Szász–Durrmeyer type operators based on Dunkl analogue. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 13(3), 915–934 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rosenblum, M.: Generalized Hermite polynomials and the Bose-like oscillator calculus. Oper. Theory, Adv. Appl. 73, 369–396 (1994)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shisha, O., Bond, B.: The degree of convergence of sequences of linear positive operators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 60, 1196–1200 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Srivastava, H.M., Özger, F., Mohiuddine, S.A.: Construction of Stancu-type Bernstein operators based on Bézier bases with shape parameter λ. Symmetry 11(3), Article ID 316 (2019)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sucu, S.: Dunkl analogue of Szász operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 244, 42–48 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Szász, O.: Generalization of Bernstein’s polynomials to the infinite interval. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 45, 239–245 (1950)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wafi, A., Rao, N.: A generalization of Szász-type operators which preserves constant and quadratic test functions. Cogent Math. 3, Article ID 1227023 (2016)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wafi, A., Rao, N.: Szász–Durrmeyer operators based on Dunkl analogue. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 12(7), 1519–1536 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wafi, A., Rao, N.: Szasz–Gamma operators based on Dunkl analogue. Iran. J. Sci. Technol., Trans. A, Sci. 43(1), 213–223 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Yüksel, I., Ispir, N.: Weighted approximation by a certain family of summation integral-type operators. Comput. Math. Appl. 52(10–11), 1463–1470 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors are extremely grateful to the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and their crucial role in leading to a better presentation of this manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All ideas of this paper was equally contributed by authors. All authors have agreed to the integrity and accuracy of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Nasiruzzaman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors are grateful for this manuscript and declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasiruzzaman, M., Rao, N., Srivastava, A. et al. Approximation on a class of Szász–Mirakyan operators via second kind of beta operators. J Inequal Appl 2020, 45 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-02317-9

Download citation

MSC

  • 41A25
  • 41A36
  • 33C45

Keywords

  • Szász–Mirakyan operators
  • Modulus of continuity
  • Rate of convergence
  • Dunkl analogue