- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Approximation by \((p,q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2018, Article number: 263 (2018)
Abstract
In the current paper, we examine the \((p,q)\)-analogue of Kantorovich type Lupaş–Schurer operators with the help of \((p,q)\)-Jackson integral. Then, we estimate the rate of convergence for the constructed operators by using the modulus of continuity in terms of a Lipschitz class function and by means of Peetre’s K-functionals based on Korovkin theorem. Moreover, we illustrate the approximation of the \((p,q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators to appointed functions by the help of Matlab algorithm and then show the comparison of the convergence of these operators with Lupaş–Schurer operators based on \((p,q)\)-integers.
1 Introduction
In 1962, Bernstein–Schurer operators were identified in the paper of Schurer [25]. In 1987, Lupaş [16] initiated the q-generalization of Bernstein operators in rational form. Some other q-Bernstein polynomial was defined by Phillips [22] in 1997. The development q-calculus applications established a precedent in the field of approximation theory. We may refer to some of them as Durrmeyer variant of q-Bernstein–Schurer operators [2], q-Bernstein–Schurer–Kantorovich type operators [3], q-Durrmeyer operators [8], q-Bernstein–Schurer–Durrmeyer type operators [12], q-Bernstein–Schurer operators [19], King’s type modified q-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators [20], q-Bernstein–Schurer–Kantorovich operators [23]. Lately, Mursaleen et al. [17] pioneered the research of \((p,q)\)-analogue of Bernstein operators which is a generalization of q-Bernstein operators (Philips). The application of \((p,q)\)-calculus has led to the discovery of various modifications of Bernstein polynomials involving \((p,q)\)-integers. For instance, Mursaleen et al. [18] constructed \((p,q)\)-analogue of Bernstein-Kantorovich operators in 2016, and Khalid et al. [15] generalised q-Bernstein–Lupaş operators. In the \((p,q)\)-calculus, parameter p provides suppleness to the approximation. Some recent articles are [1, 4–6, 9, 10, 13], and [21]. Motivated by the work of Khalid et al. [15], now we define a Kantorovich type Lupaş-Schurer operators based on the \((p,q)\)-calculus.
First of all, we introduce some important notations and definitions for the \((p,q)\)-calculus, which is a generalization of q-oscillator algebras. For \(0< q< p\leq1\) and \(m\geq0\), the \((p,q)\)-number of m is denoted by \([m]_{p,q}\) and is defined by
The formula for the \((p,q)\)-binomial expansion is defined by
where
are the \((p,q)\)-binomial coefficients. From Eq. (1) we get
and
The \((p,q)\)-Jackson integrals are defined by
and
For detailed information about the theory of \((p,q)\)-integers, we refer to [11] and [24].
2 Construction of the operator
Definition 1
For any \(0< q< p\leq1\), we construct a \((p,q)\)-analogue of Kantorovich type Lupaş–Schurer operator by
where \(m\in\mathbb{N}\), \(f\in C[0,s+1]\), \(s>0\) is a fixed natural number and
After some calculations we obtain
In the following lemma, we present some equalities for the \((p,q)\)-analogue of Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators.
Lemma 1
Let \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(\cdot;\cdot)\) be given by Eq. (4). Then we have
Proof
(i) From the definition of the operators in (4), we can easily prove the first claim as follows:
(ii) We can calculate the second identity for \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(t;x)\) as follows:
After that, by some simple computations, we have
Then, \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(t;x)\) is obtained as
Thus, (6) is obtained.
(iii) For the third identity involving \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(t^{2};x)\), we write
Firstly, we calculate B1 as
Now by using the equality
we acquire
Secondly, we work out B2 as follows:
Thirdly, we deal with B3 as
As a consequence, \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(t^{2};x)\) is found as
If we reorganize, we obtain
as desired.
(iv) By using the linearity of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}\), we acquire the first central moment \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(t-x;x)\) as
(v) Similarly, we write the second central moment \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}((t-x)^{2};x)\) as
We now plug-in into equation (18) expressions (5), (6) and (7). Then we get
□
We can easily see that \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) are linear positive operators.
Remark 1
[15] Let p, q satisfy \(0< q< p \leq1\) and \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty}[m]_{p,q}=\frac{1}{p-q}\). To obtain the convergence results for operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\), we take sequences \(q_{m}\in(0,1)\), \(p_{m}\in (q_{m},1]\) such that \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty}p_{m}=1\), \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty}q_{m}=1\), \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty}p_{m}^{m}=1\) and \(\lim_{m\rightarrow\infty}q_{m}^{m}=1\). Such sequences can be constructed by taking \(p_{m}=1-1/m^{2}\) and \(q_{m}=1-1/2m^{2}\).
Now we will present the next theorem, which ensures the approximation process according to Korovkin’s approximation theorem.
Theorem 1
Let \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) satisfy the conditions \(p_{m}\rightarrow1\), \(q_{m}\rightarrow1\), \(p_{m}^{m}\rightarrow1\) and \(q_{m}^{m}\rightarrow1\) as \(m\rightarrow\infty\) for \(q_{m}\in(0,1)\), \(p_{m}\in(q_{m},1]\). Then for every monotone increasing function \(f\in C [ 0,s+1 ]\), operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) converge uniformly to f.
Proof
By the Korovkin theorem, it is sufficient to prove that
where \(e_{k}(x)=x^{k}\), \(k=0,1,2\).
(i) By using Eq. (5), it can be clearly seen that
(ii) By Eq. (6), we write
(iii) From Eq. (7), we have
Consequently, the proof is finished. □
Before mentioning local approximation properties, we will give two lemmas as follows.
Lemma 2
If f is a monotone increasing function, then the constructed operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) are linear and positive.
Lemma 3
Let \(0< q< p\leq1\), \(0< u< v\), and \(\frac{1}{u }+\frac{1}{v }=1\). Then the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)} ( f;x )\) satisfy the following Hölder inequality:
3 Local approximation properties
Let f be a continuous function on \(C[0,s+1]\). The modulus of continuity of f is denoted by \(w(f,\sigma ) \) and given as
Then we know from the properties of modulus of continuity that for each \(\sigma>0\), we have
And also, for \(f\in C[0,s+1]\) we have \(\lim_{\sigma\rightarrow 0^{+}}w(f,\sigma)=0\). First of all, we begin by giving the rate of convergence of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) by using the modulus of continuity.
Theorem 2
Let the sequences \(p:= ( p_{m} ) \) and \(q:= ( q_{m} ) \), \(0< q_{m}< p_{m}\leq1\), satisfy the conditions \(p_{m}\rightarrow1\), \(q_{m}\rightarrow1\), \(p_{m}^{m}\rightarrow1\) and \(q_{m}^{m}\rightarrow1\) as \(m\rightarrow\infty\). Then for each \(f\in C [ 0,s+1 ]\),
where
and \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}((t-x)^{2};x)\) is as given by (19).
Proof
By the positivity and linearity of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\), we get
After that we apply (21) and obtain
Then, taking supremum of the last equation, we have
Choose
Thus, we achieve
This result completes the proof of the theorem. □
In what follows, by using Lipschitz functions, we will give the rate of convergence of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\). We remember that if the inequality
is satisfied, then f belongs to the class \(\mathrm{Lip}_{M} ( \alpha )\).
Theorem 3
Denote \(p:= ( p_{m} ) \) and \(q:= ( q_{m} ) \) satisfying \(0< q_{m}< p_{m}\leq1\). Then, for every \(f\in \mathrm{Lip}_{M} ( \alpha ) \), we have
where \(\sigma_{m}(x)\) is the same as in (22).
Proof
Let f belong to the class \(\mathrm{Lip}_{M} ( \alpha ) \) for some \(0<\alpha \leq1\). Using the monotonicity of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x) \) and (24), we obtain
Taking \(p=\frac{2}{\alpha}\), \(q=\frac{2}{2-\alpha}\) and applying Hölder inequality yields
By choosing \(\sigma_{m} ( x )\) as in Theorem 2, we complete the proof as desired. □
Finally, in the light of Peetre-K functionals, we obtain the rate of convergence of the constructed operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\). We recall the properties of Peetre-K functionals, which are defined as
Here \(C^{2} [ 0,s+1 ]\) defines the space of the functions f such that \(f, f', f''\in C[0,s+1]\). The norm in this space is given by
Also we consider the second modulus of smoothness of \(f\in C[0,s+1]\), namely
We know from [7] that for \(M>0\)
Before giving the main theorem, we present an auxiliary lemma, which will be used in the proof of the theorem.
Lemma 4
For any \(f\in C[0,s+1]\), we have
Proof
□
Theorem 4
Let \(0< q_{m}< p_{m}\leq1\), \(m\in\mathbb{N}\) and \(f\in C[0,s+1] \). There exists a constant \(M>0\) such that
where
and
Proof
Define an auxiliary operator \(K_{m,s}^{*}\) as follows:
From Lemma 1, we have
Taylor’s expansion for a function \(g \in C^{2}[0,s+1]\) can be written as follows:
Then applying operator \(K_{m,s}^{*} \) to both sides of (30), we get
So,
Using (29) and (28), we obtain
Moreover,
and
Let us employ (32) and (33) when taking the absolute value of (31). We obtain
where
We now give an upper bound for the auxiliary operator \(K_{m,l,p,q}^{*}(f;x)\). From Lemma 4 we get
Accordingly,
where
Finally, for all \(g\in C^{2}[0,s+1]\), taking the infimum of (35), we get
Consequently, using the property of Peetre-K functional, we obtain
This completes the proof. □
4 Graphical illustrations
In this section, we illustrate an approximation of the operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}\) for a function \(f(x)\) by employing Matlab codes. Let us specially choose
and take \(p=0.8\), \(q=0.7\) and \(s=5\).
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Initially, we discuss the error estimates of the Kantorovich type Lupaş–Schurer operators based on \((p, q)\)-integers for different values of x and m in Table 1 by using Algorithm 1.
And then, we illustrate the convergence of the \((p, q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators \(K_{m,s}^{(p,q)}(f;x)\) for the selected function \(f(x)= \frac{1}{96}\tan(\frac{x}{16})(\frac {x}{8})^{2}(1-\frac{x}{4})^{3}\) in Fig. 1 for several values of m by using Algorithm 2. Furthermore, we give the error estimates in Table 2 in order to indicate that the \((p, q)\)-analogue Lupaş–Schurer operators [14] converge and then plot Fig. 2. It can be clearly seen that the \((p, q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators converge faster than the \((p, q)\)-analogue Lupaş–Schurer operators.
5 Conclusion
In this paper, we constructed a new kind of Lupaş operators based on \((p, q)\)-integers to provide a better error estimation. Firstly, we investigated some local approximation results by the help of the well-known Korovkin theorem. Also, we calculated the rate of convergence of the constructed operators employing the modulus of continuity, by using Lipschitz functions and then with the help of Peetre’s K-functional. Additionally, we presented a table of error estimates of the \((p, q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators for a certain function. Finally, we compared the convergence of the new operator to that of the \((p, q)\)-analogue of Lupaş–Schurer operator.
References
Acar, T., Aral, A., Mohiuddine, S.A.: On Kantorovich modification of \((p,q)\)-Baskakov operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-016-1045-9
Acu, A.-M., Muraru, C.V., Sofonea, D.F., Radu, V.A.: Some approximation properties of a Durrmeyer variant of q-Bernstein–Schurer operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39, 5636–5650 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3949
Agrawal, P.N., Goyal, M., Kajla, A.: On q-Bernstein–Schurer–Kantorovich type operators. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital. 8, 169–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40574-015-0034-0
Agrawal, P.N., Ispir, N., Kajla, A.: Approximation properties of Lupaş–Kantorovich operators based on Polya distribution. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 65, 185–208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-015-0228-4
Agyuz, E., Acikgoz, M.: A note on \((p,q)\)-Bernstein polynomials and their applications based on \((p,q)\)-calculus. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1673-3
Cai, Q.-B., Zhou, G.: On \((p, q)\)-analogue of Kantorovich type Bernstein–Stancu–Schurer operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 276, 12–20 (2016)
DeVore, R.A., Lorentz, G.G.: Constructive Approximation. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Gupta, V.: Some approximation properties of q-Durrmeyer operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 197(1), 172–178 (2008)
Gupta, V.: \((p, q)\)-Baskakov–Kantorovich operators. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 10(4), 1551–1556 (2016)
Gupta, V., Rassias, T.M.: Lupaş–Durrmeyer operators based on Polya distribution. Banach J. Math. Anal. 8(2), 146–155 (2014)
Hounkonnou, M.N., Kyemba, J.D.B.: R\((p, q)\)-calculus: differentiation and integration. SUT J. Math. 49(2), 145–167 (2013)
Kajla, A., Ispir, N., Agrawal, P.N., Goyal, M.: q-Bernstein–Schurer–Durrmeyer type operators for functions of one and two variables. Appl. Math. Comput. 275, 372–385 (2016)
Kanat, K., Sofyalıoğlu, M.: Some approximation results for Stancu type Lupaş–Schurer operators based on \((p,q)\)-integers. Appl. Math. Comput. 317, 129–142 (2018)
Kanat, K., Sofyalıoğlu, M.: Some approximation results for \((p,q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer operators. Filomat 32(1), 217–229 (2018)
Khan, K., Lobiyal, D.K.: Bezier curves based on Lupas \((p, q)\)-analogue of Bernstein functions in CAGD. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 317, 458–477 (2017)
Lupaş, A.: A q-analogue of the Bernstein operator. In: University of Cluj-Napoca Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus Preprint, vol. 9, pp. 85–92 (1987)
Mursaleen, M., Ansari, K.J., Khan, A.: On \((p, q)\)-analogue of Bernstein operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 266, 874–882 (2015) (Erratum: Appl. Math. Comput. 266, 874–882 (2015) )
Mursaleen, M., Ansari, K.J., Khan, A.: Some approximation results for Bernstein–Kantorovich operators based on \((p,q)\)-calculus. UPB Sci. Bull., Ser. A 78(4), 129–142 (2016)
Mursaleen, M., Khan, A.: Generalized q-Bernstein–Schurer operators and some approximation theorems. J. Funct. Spaces Appl. 2013, Article ID 719834 (2013)
Mursaleen, M., Khan, F., Khan, A.: Approximation properties for King’s type modified q-Bernstein–Kantorovich operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 38, 5242–5252 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.3454
Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M., Nurgali, A.: Some approximation results on Bernstein–Schurer operators defined by \((p, q)\)-integers. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 249 (2015)
Phillips, G.M.: Bernstein polynomials based on the q-integers. Ann. Numer. Math. 4(1–4), 511–518 (1997)
Ruchi, R., Ispir, N., Agrawal, P.N.: Kantorovich variant of a new kind of q-Bernstein–Schurer operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.4418
Sadjang, P.N.: On the fundamental theorem of \((p, q)\)-calculus and some \((p, q)\)-Taylor formulas (2013) arXiv:1309.3934v1
Schurer, F.: Linear positive operators in approximation theory. Math. Inst., Techn. Univ. Delf Report (1962)
Funding
The authors have not received any research funding for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors declare that they have studied in collaboration and share the same responsibility for this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanat, K., Sofyalıoğlu, M. Approximation by \((p,q)\)-Lupaş–Schurer–Kantorovich operators. J Inequal Appl 2018, 263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1858-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1858-9