- Research
- Open access
- Published:

# An improved approach for studying oscillation of second-order neutral delay differential equations

*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*
**volume 2018**, Article number: 193 (2018)

## Abstract

The paper is devoted to the study of oscillation of solutions to a class of second-order half-linear neutral differential equations with delayed arguments. New oscillation criteria are established, and they essentially improve the well-known results reported in the literature, including those for non-neutral differential equations. The adopted approach refines the classical Riccati transformation technique by taking into account such part of the overall impact of the delay that has been neglected in the earlier results. The effectiveness of the obtained criteria is illustrated via examples.

## 1 Introduction

In this paper, we are concerned with the oscillation problem of a class of second-order half-linear neutral delay differential equations

where \(z(t) := x(t)+p(t)x(\tau(t))\). Throughout the paper, we always assume that

- (H
_{1}): -
*α*is a quotient of odd positive integers; - (H
_{2}): -
\(r\in \mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),(0,\infty))\), \(p, q \in\mathrm{C}([t_{0},\infty),[0,\infty))\), \(0\le p(t)< 1\), and \(q(t)\) does not vanish identically on any half-line of the form \([t_{*},\infty )\), \(t_{*}\ge t_{0}\);

- (H
_{3}): -
\(\tau, \sigma\in\mathrm{C}([t_{0},\infty),\mathbb {R})\) satisfy \(\tau(t)\le t\), \(\sigma(t )< t\), and \(\lim_{t\to\infty}\tau(t) =\lim_{t\to\infty}\sigma(t) = \infty\).

We will consider the following case:

in order to complement the recent work [1], where the oscillatory behavior of (*E*) under the assumption

has been investigated.

By a solution of (*E*) we mean a nontrivial real-valued function \(x\in\mathrm{C}([t_{a},\infty),\mathbb {R})\) with \(t_{a} := \min\{\tau(t_{b}),\sigma (t_{b})\}\) for some \(t_{b}\ge t_{0}\), which has the property \(r (z' )^{\alpha}\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),\mathbb {R})\) and satisfies (*E*) on \([t_{0},\infty)\). We consider only those solutions of (*E*) which exist on some half-line \([t_{b},\infty)\) and satisfy the condition

As is customary, a solution *x* of (*E*) is said to be oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros; otherwise, it is said to be nonoscillatory. The equation itself is called oscillatory if all its solutions oscillate.

The oscillation theory of differential equations with deviating arguments was initiated in a pioneering paper [2] of Fite, which appeared in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Since then, there has been much research activity concerning the oscillation of solutions of various classes of differential and functional differential equations. The interest in this subject has been reflected by extensive references in monographs [3–7]. We also refer the reader to the papers [8–10] and the references cited therein regarding similar discrete analogues of (*E*) and its particular cases and modifications.

A neutral delay differential equation is a differential equation in which the highest order derivative of the unknown function appears both with and without delay. During the last three decades, oscillation of neutral differential equations has become an important area of research; see, e.g., [11–27]. This is due to the fact that such equations arise from a variety of applications including population dynamics, automatic control, mixing liquids, and vibrating masses attached to an elastic bar; see Hale [28]. Especially, second-order neutral delay differential equations are of great interest in biology in explaining self-balancing of the human body and in robotics in constructing biped robots [29].

One of the traditional tools in the study of oscillation of equations which are special cases of (*E*) has been based on a reduction of order and the comparison with oscillation of first-order delay differential equations. In particular, Koplatadze in 1986 [30] and Wei in 1988 [31] proved that the second-order delay differential equation

is oscillatory if

or

Conditions (\(1_{a}\)) and (\(1_{b}\)), which obviously hold for delay equations only, are analogous to the well-known oscillation criteria due to Ladas et al. [32] and Koplatadze and Chanturiya [33], respectively,

for the first-order delay differential equation

There is an obvious gap between conditions (\(1_{a}\))–(\(1_{b}\)) ((\(2_{a}\))–(\(2_{b}\))) if \(k< K\) (\(l< L\)). For first-order equations, filling this gap has been an interesting research problem in the last few decades; see, e.g., the excellent survey [34] and the references cited therein. In 2000, Koplatadze et al. [35] presented the following oscillation criteria for (2) which improve (\(1_{a}\))–(\(1_{b}\)), namely

where *σ* is nondecreasing, or

One may note that, despite similarities, there is a significant difference between (\(1_{a}\))–(\(1_{b}\)) ((\(1_{a}'\))–(\(1_{b}'\))) and (\(2_{a}\))–(\(2_{b}\)). According to [33], it is known that if \(L< 1/\mathrm {e}\), then (3) has a nonoscillatory solution. Oscillation of equation (3) is caused by the presence of delay. However, equation (2) can be oscillatory even in the case where \(\sigma(t)= t\).

Another widely used technique, applicable also in the above-mentioned case, involves the Riccati type transformation which has been used to reduce equation (*E*) to a first-order Riccati inequality. In 2006, Sun and Meng [36] improved the oscillation result of Džurina and Stavroulakis [37] by employing the Riccati transformation

which yields that the particular case of (*E*), equation

is oscillatory if (1) holds, \(\sigma\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty ),\mathbb {R})\), \(\sigma'(t)>0\), and

Xu and Meng [23] generalized condition (4) to (*E*) and proved that if (1) is satisfied, \(\sigma\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),\mathbb {R})\), \(\sigma'(t)>0\), and

then (*E*) is oscillatory. Later on, Erbe et al. [38] showed that (\(E'\)) is oscillatory assuming that (1) holds, \(\alpha\ge1\), \(r'\ge0\), \(\int _{t_{0}}^{\infty}\sigma^{\alpha}(s)q(s)\,\mathrm {d}s =\infty\), and

where \(\psi\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),(0,\infty))\) and \(\psi '_{+}(t):=\max\{0, \psi'(t)\}\). The similar ideas as those above have been exploited and extended for (*E*) and its various generalizations in a number of papers; see, e.g., [11, 16, 17, 20–23, 26, 27, 39] and the references therein.

The objective of this paper is to establish new oscillation results for (*E*), which would improve the above-mentioned ones. The paper is organized as follows. First, motivated by [35], we generalize conditions (\(1_{a}'\)) and (\(1_{b}'\)) for linear equation (2) to be applicable to the half-linear neutral equation (*E*). Second, we refine classical Riccati transformation techniques to obtain new oscillation criteria, which, to the best of our knowledge, essentially improve a large number of related results reported in the literature, including those for second-order delay differential equations. The adopted approach lies in establishing sharper estimates relating a nonoscillatory solution with its derivatives in the case when conditions analogous to (\(1_{a}'\))–(\(1_{b}'\)) fail to apply. We illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained criteria via a series of examples and comparison with other known oscillation results.

In what follows, all occurring functional inequalities are assumed to hold eventually, that is, they are satisfied for all *t* large enough. As usual and without loss of generality, we can deal only with eventually positive solutions of (*E*).

## 2 Preliminaries

For the sake of brevity and clarity, we let

for \(t\ge t_{1}\), where \(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\) is large enough.

To prove our oscillation criteria, we need the following auxiliary results.

### Lemma 1

(see [12, Lemma 3])

*Let condition* (1) *hold and assume that*
\(x(t)\)
*is a positive solution of* (*E*) *on*
\([t_{0},\infty)\). *Then there exists a*
\(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\)
*such that*, *for*
\(t\ge t_{1}\),

### Lemma 2

(see [27, Lemma 2.3])

*Let*
\(g(u) = Au - Bu^{(\alpha+1)/\alpha}\), *where*
*A*
*and*
\(B>0\)
*are constants*, *α*
*is a quotient of odd natural numbers*. *Then*
*g*
*attains its maximum value on*
\(\mathbb {R}\)
*at*
\(u^{*} = (\alpha A/((\alpha +1)B) )^{\alpha}\)
*and*

## 3 Main results

Now, we state and prove our first oscillation result, which extends [35, Theorem 3] obtained for the linear delay differential equation (2) to the half-linear neutral delay differential equation (*E*).

### Theorem 3

*Let condition* (1) *be satisfied*. *If*

*or*

*then* (*E*) *is oscillatory*.

### Proof

Assume that (*E*) has a nonoscillatory solution \(x(t)\) on \([t_{0},\infty)\). Without loss of generality, we may assume that there exists a \(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\) such that \(x(t)>0\), \(x(\tau(t))>0\), and \(x(\sigma (t))>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\). By the definition of \(z(t)\), we obtain, for \(t\ge t_{1}\),

which together with (*E*) implies that

On the other hand, it follows from the monotonicity of \(r^{1/\alpha }(t)z'(t)\) that

A simple computation shows that

Applying the chain rule, it is easy to see that

By virtue of (11), the latter equality yields

Combining (13) and (14), we obtain

Integrating (15) from \(t_{1}\) to *t*, we have

Taking (12) and the monotonicity of \(r^{1/\alpha}(t)z'(t)\) into account, we arrive at

Thus, we conclude that

Using (17) in (11), by virtue of (7), one can see that \(y(t): = r(t) (z'(t) )^{\alpha}\) is a positive solution of the first-order delay differential inequality

In view of [40, Theorem 1], the associated delay differential equation

also has a positive solution. However, it is well known that condition (9) or condition (10) ensures oscillation of (19). This in turn means that (*E*) cannot have positive solutions. The proof is complete. □

Letting \(p(t) = 0\) in (*E*), the following result is an immediate consequence.

### Corollary 1

*Let condition* (1) *hold*. *If*

*or*

*then* (\(E'\)) *is oscillatory*.

### Remark 1

Note that for \(\alpha= 1\), \(r(t) = 1\), and \(p(t)=0\), Theorem 3 reduces to [35, Theorem 3].

### Example 1

For \(t\ge1\), consider the second-order neutral differential equation

where \(z(t): = x(t)+p_{0}x(\tau(t))\), *α* is a quotient of odd positive integers, \(p_{0}\in[0,1)\), \(\tau(t)\le t\), \(q_{0}>0\), and \(\lambda\in(0,1)\). By Theorem 3, (\(E_{x}\)) is oscillatory if

For a particular case of (\(E_{x}\)), equation

oscillation of all solutions is guaranteed by condition

To the best of our knowledge, the known related criterion for (22) based on comparison with a first-order delay differential equation (see, e.g., [12, Theorem 2]) gives \(q_{0}>3.61643\), which is a significantly weaker result.

On the other hand, for equation

condition (23) fails to hold and \(x(t) = t^{1/2}\) is a nonoscillatory solution of (24).

Obviously, if

then Theorem 3 cannot be applied to (*E*). However, if (25) holds and \(y(t)\) is a positive solution of (18), then it is possible to obtain sharper lower bounds of the ratio \({y(\sigma(t))}/{y(t)}\). This will allow us to refine classical Riccati transformation techniques which are widely used in the study of oscillation of second-order differential equations. Zhang and Zhou [41] obtained such bounds for the first-order delay differential equation (19) by employing a sequence \(\{ f_{n}(\rho)\}_{n = 0}^{\infty}\) defined as

where *ρ* is a positive constant satisfying

They showed that, for \(\rho\in(0,1/\mathrm {e}]\), the sequence is increasing and bounded above and \(\lim_{t\to\infty}f_{n}(\rho) = f(\rho)\in [1,\mathrm {e}]\), where \(f(\rho)\) is a real root of the equation

Their result plays an essential role when proving the following lemma.

### Lemma 4

*Let condition* (1) *hold and assume that*
*σ*
*is strictly increasing*, *condition* (27) *holds for some*
\(\rho>0\), *and* (*E*) *has a positive solution*
\(x(t)\)
*on*
\([t_{0},\infty)\). *Then*, *for every*
\(n\ge0\), \(y(t) := r(t) (z'(t) )^{\alpha}\)
*satisfies*

*for*
*t*
*large enough*, *where*
\(f_{n}(\rho)\)
*is defined by* (26).

### Proof

Assume that (*E*) has a nonoscillatory solution \(x(t)\) on \([t_{0},\infty)\). Without loss of generality, we can suppose that there exists a \(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\) such that \(x(t)>0\), \(x(\tau(t))>0\), and \(x(\sigma (t))>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\). As in the proof of Theorem 3, we deduce that \(y(t): = r(t) (z'(t) )^{\alpha}\) is a positive solution of the first-order delay differential inequality (18). Proceeding in a similar manner as in the proof of [41, Lemma 1], we see that estimate (29) holds. □

In what follows, we employ the Riccati substitution technique to obtain new oscillation criteria for (*E*), which are especially effective in the case when Theorem 3 fails to apply.

### Theorem 5

*Let condition* (1) *be satisfied and assume that*
\(\sigma\in \mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),\mathbb {R})\), \(\sigma'(t)>0\), *and condition* (27) *holds for some*
\(\rho>0\). *If there exists a function*
\(\varphi\in \mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),(0,\infty))\)
*such that*, *for some sufficiently large*
\(T\ge t_{1}\)
*and for some*
\(n\ge0\),

*where*
\(f_{n}(\rho)\)
*is defined by* (26) *and*
\(\varphi'_{+}(t) = \max\{ 0, \varphi'(t) \}\), *then* (*E*) *is oscillatory*.

### Proof

Assume that (*E*) has a nonoscillatory solution \(x(t)\) on \([t_{0},\infty)\). Without loss of generality, we may assume that there exists a \(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\) such that \(x(t)>0\), \(x(\tau(t))>0\), and \(x(\sigma (t))>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\). Define the Riccati function by

Then \(w(t)>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\). Differentiating (31), we arrive at

It follows from Lemma 4 that there exists a \(T\ge t_{1}\) large enough such that

By virtue of (11) and (33), applications of (31) and (32) yield

Letting

in (8), it follows now from Lemma 2 and (34) that

Integrating (35) from *T* to *t*, we obtain

which contradicts condition (30). This completes the proof. □

### Remark 2

Theorem 5 is new because of the constant \(f_{n}(\rho)\) (for some \(n\ge 0\)) appearing in (30). So far, all results obtained in a similar manner have been formulated for \(n=0\); see, e.g., [16, 17, 20–23, 26, 27, 36, 37]. Thus, for any given \(n>0\), our result essentially improves the previous ones.

Letting \(\varphi(t)= R^{\alpha}(\sigma(t)) \) in (30), Theorem 5 yields the following result.

### Corollary 2

*Let condition* (1) *hold and assume that*
\(\sigma\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),\mathbb {R})\), \(\sigma'(t)>0\), *and condition* (27) *holds for some*
\(\rho>0\). *If*, *for some sufficiently large*
\(T\ge t_{1}\)
*and for some*
\(n\ge0\),

*where*
\(f_{n}(\rho)\)
*is defined by* (26), *then* (*E*) *is oscillatory*.

### Example 2

As in Example 1, we consider (\(E_{x}\)). If we assume that \(\rho\le1/\mathrm {e}\) in (\(C_{1}\)), then the sequence \(\{f_{n}(\rho)\}_{n = 0}^{\infty}\) defined by (26) has a finite limit (28), which can be expressed as

where *W* standardly denotes the principal branch of the Lambert function; see [42] for details. Then, by Corollary 2, (\(E_{x}\)) is oscillatory if

In order to illustrate the efficiency of the above criterion, we stress that an application of (5) yields that condition

ensures oscillation of (\(E_{x}\)). For a particular case of (\(E_{x}\)), equation

condition (\(C_{2}\)) gives \(3.5876>0.3164\), which implies that (37) is oscillatory. However, one may see that the left-hand side of inequality (\(C_{2}'\)) becomes 0.2187, which means that condition (\(C_{2}'\)) fails to hold for (37). Moreover, one can easily verify that the criterion resulting from Theorem 3 cannot be applied to (37).

The following theorem serves as an alternative to Theorem 5.

### Theorem 6

*Let condition* (1) *be satisfied and assume that there exists a function*
\(\psi\in\mathrm{C}^{1}([t_{0},\infty),(0,\infty))\)
*such that*, *for some sufficiently large*
\(T\ge t_{1}\),

*where*
\(\psi'_{+}(t) = \max\{ 0, \psi'(t) \}\). *Then* (*E*) *is oscillatory*.

### Proof

Assume that (*E*) has a nonoscillatory solution \(x(t)\) on \([t_{0},\infty)\). Without loss of generality, we can suppose that there exists a \(t_{1}\ge t_{0}\) such that \(x(t)>0\), \(x(\tau(t))>0\), and \(x(\sigma (t))>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\). Define the Riccati function by

Then \(w(t)>0\) for \(t\ge t_{1}\) and

As in the proof of Theorem 3, we get (16), i.e.,

or

Integrating the latter inequality from \(\sigma(t)\) to *t*, we obtain

Combining (11) and (41), it follows that

Hence, by (39) and (40), we deduce that

Letting

in (8), it follows from Lemma 2 and (42) that

Let \(T\ge t_{1}\) be sufficiently large. Integrating (43) from *T* to *t*, we have

which contradicts condition (38). The proof is complete. □

### Example 3

As in Example 1, we consider (\(E_{x}\)). By Theorem 6, (\(E_{x}\)) is oscillatory if

where \(\hat{r} := (\alpha/(\alpha+(1-p_{0})^{\alpha}q_{0} \lambda ^{\alpha}) )^{\alpha}\). An application of (6) yields that (\(E_{x}\)) is oscillatory provided that

It is easy to see that \(\hat{r}<1\), and thus our criterion (\(C_{3}\)) provides a stronger result.

## 4 Conclusions

In the present paper, we have studied the oscillatory behavior of the second-order half-linear neutral delay differential equation (*E*). As it has been illustrated through several examples, the results obtained improve a large number of the existing ones. Our technique lies in establishing some sharper estimates relating a nonoscillatory solution with its derivatives in the case when criteria analogous to (\(1_{a}'\))–(\(1_{b}'\)) fail to apply.

The results presented in this paper strongly depend on the properties of first-order delay differential equations. An interesting problem for further research is to establish different iterative techniques for testing oscillations in (*E*) independently on the constant \(1/\mathrm {e}\).

## References

Bohner, M., Grace, S.R., Jadlovská, I.: Oscillation criteria for second-order neutral delay differential equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.

**2017**, 60 (2017)Fite, W.B.: Concerning the zeros of the solutions of certain differential equations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.

**19**(4), 341–352 (1918)Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M., Li, W.-T.: Nonoscillation and Oscillation: Theory for Functional Differential Equations. Dekker, New York (2004)

Agarwal, R.P., Grace, S.R., O’Regan, D.: Oscillation Theory for Second Order Linear, Half-Linear, Superlinear and Sublinear Dynamic Equations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002)

Agarwal, R.P., Grace, S.R., O’Regan, D.: Oscillation Theory for Second Order Dynamic Equations. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)

Erbe, L.H., Kong, Q., Zhang, B.G.: Oscillation Theory for Functional Differential Equations. Dekker, New York (1995)

Győri, I., Ladas, G.: Oscillation Theory of Delay Differential Equations with Applications. Oxford University Press, New York (1991)

Alzabut, J., Bolat, Y.: Oscillation criteria for nonlinear higher-order forced functional difference equations. Vietnam J. Math.

**43**(3), 583–594 (2015)Bolat, Y., Alzabut, J.O.: On the oscillation of higher-order half-linear delay difference equations. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci.

**6**(3), 423–427 (2012)Bolat, Y., Alzabut, J.: On the oscillation of even-order half-linear functional difference equations with damping term. Int. J. Differ. Equ.

**2014**, Article ID 791631 (2014)Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M., Li, T., Zhang, C.: A new approach in the study of oscillatory behavior of even-order neutral delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**225**, 787–794 (2013)Baculíková, B., Džurina, J.: Oscillation theorems for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl.

**62**(12), 4472–4478 (2011)Candan, T.: Oscillatory behavior of second order nonlinear neutral differential equations with distributed deviating arguments. Appl. Math. Comput.

**262**, 199–203 (2015)Dong, J.-G.: Oscillation behavior of second order nonlinear neutral differential equations with deviating arguments. Comput. Math. Appl.

**59**(12), 3710–3717 (2010)Grace, S.R., Graef, J.R., Tunç, E.: Oscillatory behavior of second order damped neutral differential equations with distributed deviating arguments. Miskolc Math. Notes

**18**(2), 759–769 (2017)Han, Z., Li, T., Sun, S., Sun, Y.: Remarks on the paper [Appl. Math. Comput. 207 (2009) 388–396]. Appl. Math. Comput.

**215**(11), 3998–4007 (2010)Li, T., Thandapani, E., Graef, J.R., Tunç, E.: Oscillation of second-order Emden–Fowler neutral differential equations. Nonlinear Stud.

**20**(1), 1–8 (2013)Liu, L., Bai, Y.: New oscillation criteria for second-order nonlinear neutral delay differential equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math.

**231**(2), 657–663 (2009)Liu, L., Bai, Y.: Erratum to: “New oscillation criteria for second-order nonlinear neutral delay differential equations” [J. Comput. Appl. Math. 231 (2009) 657–663]. J. Comput. Appl. Math.

**233**(10), 2755 (2010)Liu, H., Meng, F., Liu, P.: Oscillation and asymptotic analysis on a new generalized Emden–Fowler equation. Appl. Math. Comput.

**219**(5), 2739–2748 (2012)Meng, F., Xu, R.: Oscillation criteria for certain even order quasi-linear neutral differential equations with deviating arguments. Appl. Math. Comput.

**190**(1), 458–464 (2007)Tunç, E., Grace, S.R.: On oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of a second-order nonlinear damped neutral differential equation. Int. J. Differ. Equ.

**2016**, Article ID 3746368 (2016)Xu, R., Meng, F.: Some new oscillation criteria for second order quasi-linear neutral delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**182**(1), 797–803 (2006)Xu, R., Meng, F.: New Kamenev-type oscillation criteria for second order neutral nonlinear differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**188**(2), 1364–1370 (2007)Xu, R., Meng, F.: Oscillation criteria for second order quasi-linear neutral delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**192**(1), 216–222 (2007)Ye, L., Xu, Z.: Oscillation criteria for second order quasilinear neutral delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**207**(2), 388–396 (2009)Zhang, S.-Y., Wang, Q.-R.: Oscillation of second-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Appl. Math. Comput.

**216**(10), 2837–2848 (2010)Hale, J.K.: Partial neutral functional differential equations. Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl.

**39**(4), 339–344 (1994)MacDonald, N.: Biological Delay Systems: Linear Stability Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

Koplatadze, R.G.: Criteria for the oscillation of solutions of differential inequalities and second-order equations with retarded argument. Tbiliss. Gos. Univ. Inst. Prikl. Mat. Tr.

**17**, 104–121 (1986) (in Russian)Wei, J.J.: Oscillation of second order delay differential equation. Ann. Differ. Equ.

**4**(4), 473–478 (1988)Ladas, G., Lakshmikantham, V., Papadakis, J.S.: Oscillations of higher-order retarded differential equations generated by the retarded argument. In: Delay and Functional Differential Equations and Their Applications, pp. 219–231. Academic Press, New York (1972)

Koplatadze, R.G., Chanturiya, T.A.: Oscillating and monotone solutions of first-order differential equations with deviating argument. Differ. Uravn.

**18**(8), 1463–1465, 1472 (1982) (in Russian)Wang, Z.-C., Stavroulakis, I.P., Qian, X.-Z.: A survey on the oscillation of solutions of first order linear differential equations with deviating arguments. Appl. Math. E-Notes

**2**, 171–191 (2002)Koplatadze, R., Kvinikadze, G., Stavroulakis, I.P.: Oscillation of second order linear delay differential equations. Funct. Differ. Equ.

**7**(1–2), 121–145 (2000)Sun, Y.G., Meng, F.W.: Note on the paper of Džurina and Stavroulakis: “Oscillation criteria for second-order delay differential equations” [Appl. Math. Comput. 140 (2003) 445–453]. Appl. Math. Comput.

**174**(2), 1634–1641 (2006)Džurina, J., Stavroulakis, I.P.: Oscillation criteria for second-order delay differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput.

**140**(2–3), 445–453 (2003)Erbe, L., Hassan, T.S., Peterson, A., Saker, S.H.: Oscillation criteria for half-linear delay dynamic equations on time scales. Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory

**9**(1), 51–68 (2009)Wu, H., Erbe, L., Peterson, A.: Oscillation of solution to second-order half-linear delay dynamic equations on time scales. Electron. J. Differ. Equ.

**2016**, 71 (2016)Philos, Ch.G.: On the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero at ∞ for differential equations with positive delays. Arch. Math. (Basel)

**36**(1), 168–178 (1981)Zhang, B.G., Zhou, Y.: The distribution of zeros of solutions of differential equations with a variable delay. J. Math. Anal. Appl.

**256**(1), 216–228 (2001)Corless, R.M., Gonnet, G.H., Hare, D.E.G., Jeffrey, D.J., Knuth, D.E.: On the Lambert

*W*function. Adv. Comput. Math.**5**(1), 329–359 (1996)

## Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the editors and two anonymous referees for the careful reading of the original manuscript and useful comments that helped to improve the presentation of the results and accentuate important details.

## Funding

This research is supported by NNSF of P.R. China (Grant No. 61503171), CPSF (Grant No. 2015M582091), NSF of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2016JL021), DSRF of Linyi University (Grant No. LYDX2015BS001), and the AMEP of Linyi University, P.R. China. The research of the second and third authors is supported by the grant project KEGA 035TUKE-4/2017.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Contributions

All four authors contributed equally to this work. They all read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

## Additional information

### Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Grace, S.R., Džurina, J., Jadlovská, I. *et al.* An improved approach for studying oscillation of second-order neutral delay differential equations.
*J Inequal Appl* **2018**, 193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1767-y

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1767-y