Skip to main content

Anisotropic Picone identities and anisotropic Hardy inequalities

Abstract

In this paper, we derive an anisotropic Picone identity for the anisotropic Laplacian, which contains some known Picone identities. As applications, a Sturmian comparison principle to the anisotropic elliptic equation and an anisotropic Hardy type inequality are shown.

Introduction and main results

In recent years, the anisotropic Laplacian

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr)} ,\quad {p_{i}} > 1, $$
(1.1)

has been considerably concerned. Note that if \({p_{i}} = 2\) (\({i = 1, \ldots,n}\)), then (1.1) becomes the classical Laplacian; if \({p_{i}} = p = \mathrm{const}\), then (1.1) is the pseudo-p-Laplacian (see [1])

$$\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{p - 2}} \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr)}. $$

The anisotropic Laplacian has not only the widespread practical background in the natural science, but also the important theoretical value in the mathematics. For example, it reflects anisotropic physical properties of some reinforced materials (Lions [2] and Tang [3]), and describes the dynamics of fluids in the anisotropic media when the conductivities of the media are different in each direction [4, 5]. The equations associated with (1.1) are also deduced in the image processing [6]. Existence, integrability, boundedness, and continuity of solutions to anisotropic elliptic equations have received much attention; see [715] and the references therein. In this paper, we prove an anisotropic Picone identity for the anisotropic Laplacian, which contains some known Picone identities. As applications, a Sturmian comparison principle to the anisotropic elliptic equation and an anisotropic Hardy type inequality are given. Before giving the main results of this paper, we briefly recall the existing results for the isotropic case.

Picone [16] considered the homogeneous linear second order differential system

$$\left \{ \textstyle\begin{array}{l} {{ ( {{a_{1}}(x)u'} )}^{\prime}} + {b_{1}}(x)u = 0, \\ {{ ( {{a_{2}}(x)v'} )}^{\prime}} + {b_{2}}(x)v = 0, \end{array}\displaystyle \right . $$

where u and v are differentiable functions in x, and proved the identity that, for the differentiable function \(v(x) \ne0\),

$$ { \biggl( {\frac{u}{ v} \bigl( {{a_{1}}u'v - {a_{2}}uv'} \bigr)} \biggr)^{\prime}} = ( {{b_{2}} - {b_{1}}} ){u^{2}} + ( {{a_{1}} - {a_{2}}} ){u^{\prime 2}} + {a_{2}} { \biggl( {u' - v'\frac{u}{ v}} \biggr)^{2}}; $$
(1.2)

then a Sturmian comparison principle and the oscillation theory of solutions were obtained via (1.2). Picone [17] (see also Allegretto [18]) generalized (1.2) to a Laplacian that, for differentiable functions \(v > 0\) and \(u \geq0\),

$$\begin{aligned} { \biggl( {\nabla u - \frac{u}{ v}\nabla v} \biggr)^{2}} =& {\vert {\nabla u} \vert ^{2}} + \frac{{{u^{2}}}}{ {{v^{2}}}}{\vert {\nabla v} \vert ^{2}} - 2\frac{u}{ v} \nabla v \cdot\nabla u \\ =& {\vert {\nabla u} \vert ^{2}} - \nabla \biggl( {\frac{{{u^{2}}}}{ v}} \biggr)\nabla v. \end{aligned}$$
(1.3)

Allegretto and Huang [19], Dunninger [20] independently extended (1.3) to a p-Laplacian, for differentiable functions \(v > 0\) and \(u \geq0\),

$$\begin{aligned}& {\vert {\nabla u} \vert ^{p}} + (p - 1) \frac{{{u^{p}}}}{ {{v^{p}}}}{\vert {\nabla v} \vert ^{p}} - p\frac{{{u^{p - 1}}}}{ {{v^{p - 1}}}}{ \vert {\nabla v} \vert ^{p - 2}}\nabla v \cdot\nabla u \\& \quad = {\vert {\nabla u} \vert ^{p}} - \nabla \biggl( { \frac{{{u^{p}}}}{ {{v^{p - 1}}}}} \biggr){\vert {\nabla v} \vert ^{p - 2}}\nabla v, \end{aligned}$$
(1.4)

and applied (1.4) to derive a Sturmian comparison principle, Liouville’s theorem, the Hardy inequality, and some profound results for p-Laplace equations and systems. For other generalizations of the Picone identities and applications, see Bal [21], Dwivedi [22], Dwivedi and Tyagi [23], Niu, Zhang and Wang [24], Tyagi [25]. These results indicate that Picone identities are seemingly simple in form, but extremely useful in the study of partial differential equations, and they have become an important tool in the analysis.

Our main results are as follows.

Theorem 1.1

Anisotropic Picone identity

Let \(v > 0\) and \(u \geq0\) be two differentiable functions in the set \(\Omega \subset{R^{n}}\), and denote

$$\begin{aligned}& R(u,v) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {\frac {\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( { \frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr){{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}}, \end{aligned}$$
(1.5)
$$\begin{aligned}& L(u,v)= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}}\frac {{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \\& \hphantom{L(u,v)={}}{} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { ( {{p_{i}} - 1} )\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}}}}}}{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}}, \end{aligned}$$
(1.6)

where \({p_{i}} > 1\) (\({i = 1, \ldots,n}\)). Then

$$ R(u,v) = L(u,v). $$
(1.7)

Moreover, we have

$$L(u,v) \geq0; $$

furthermore, \(L(u,v) = 0\) a.e. in Ω if and only if \(u = cv\) a.e. in Ω, c is a positive constant.

Remark 1.2

If \({p_{i}} = 2\) (\({i = 1, \ldots,n}\)) in (1.5) and (1.6), we have (1.3) from (1.7). If \({p_{i}} = p = \mathrm{const}\) (\({i = 1, \ldots,n}\)) in (1.5) and (1.6), the result in [26] follows. Moreover, the identity in Theorem 1.1 is different from the one in [26].

Theorem 1.3

Anisotropic Hardy type inequality

Let \(u \in C_{0}^{1} ( A )\), \(1 < {p_{i}} < n\), \(i = 1, \ldots,n\), \(A = \{ x \in{R^{n}}| {{x_{i}} \ne0,i = 1, \ldots,n} \}\). Then we have

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \int_{A} {\biggl\vert \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}} \biggr\vert }^{p_{i}}\,dx \geq\sum_{i = 1}^{n} \biggl( \frac{p_{i} - 1}{p_{i}} \biggr)^{p_{i}} \int_{A} {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{{p_{i}}}}}}}. $$
(1.8)

This paper is organized as follows: The proofs of Theorem 1.1 and a Sturmian comparison principle to the anisotropic elliptic equation are given in Section 2; Section 3 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.3 in which a key ingredient is to choose a suitable auxiliary function (see (3.3) below) for the anisotropic case. Two corollaries are also furnished.

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Proof of Theorem 1.1

One derives easily that

$$\begin{aligned} R(u,v) &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {\frac {\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( { \frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr){{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {\frac {{{p_{i}}{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}} - {u^{{p_{i}}}}({p_{i}} - 1){v^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}}}{ {{{ [ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}} ]}^{2}}}}{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \\ &=\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}}\frac {{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { ( {{p_{i}} - 1} )\frac {{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}}}}}}{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \\ &=L(u,v), \end{aligned}$$

which is (1.7). To check \(L(u,v) \geq0\), we rewrite \(L(u,v)\) by

$$\begin{aligned} L(u,v) =&\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} - \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}}\frac {{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 1}}\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert } + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { ( {{p_{i}} - 1} )\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}}}}}}{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \\ &{} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}} \frac{{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \biggl\{ {\biggl\vert {\frac {{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert - \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\} } \\ :=& \mathit{I} + \mathit{II}, \end{aligned}$$
(2.1)

where

$$\begin{aligned}& \mathit{I} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}} \biggl[ {\frac{1}{ {{p_{i}}}}{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}} + \frac{{{p_{i}} - 1}}{ {{p_{i}}}}{{ \biggl( {{{ \biggl( {\frac{u}{ v}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert } \biggr)}^{{p_{i}} - 1}}} \biggr)}^{\frac{{{p_{i}}}}{{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr]} \\& \hphantom{\mathit{I} ={}}{} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}}\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 1}}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }, \\& \mathit{II} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{p_{i}}\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \biggl\{ {\biggl\vert {\frac {{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert - \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\} }. \end{aligned}$$

Recall Young’s inequality: for \(a \geq0\) and \(b \geq0\),

$$ ab \leq\frac{{{a^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ p} + \frac{{{b^{{q_{i}}}}}}{ q}, $$
(2.2)

where \({p_{i}} > 1\), \({q_{i}} > 1\) (\(i = 1, \ldots,n\)) and \(\frac{1}{ {{p_{i}}}} + \frac{1}{{{q_{i}}}} = 1\); the equality holds if and only if \({a^{{p_{i}}}} = {b^{{q_{i}}}}\), namely, \(a = {b^{\frac{1}{{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}\). We take \(a = \vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial {x_{i}}}}} \vert \) and \(b = { ( {\frac{u}{v}\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}} \vert } )^{{p_{i}} - 1}}\) in (2.2) to obtain

$$\begin{aligned}& {p_{i}}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert { \biggl( {\frac{u}{ v}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert } \biggr)^{{p_{i}} - 1}} \\& \quad \leq{p_{i}} \biggl[ {\frac{1}{ {{p_{i}}}}{{\biggl\vert { \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}} + \frac{{{p_{i}} - 1}}{ {{p_{i}}}}{{ \biggl( {{{ \biggl( {\frac{u}{ v}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert } \biggr)}^{{p_{i}} - 1}}} \biggr)}^{\frac{{{p_{i}}}}{{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr], \end{aligned}$$
(2.3)

and so \(\mathit{I} \geq0\) from (2.3). Clearly, \(\mathit{II} \geq0\) in virtue of \(\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \vert \vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \vert - \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \geq0\). Hence \(L(u,v) \geq0\) from (2.1).

If \(u = cv\), c is a positive constant, then clearly \(L(u,v) = 0\). Now let us conclude that \(L(u,v) = 0\) implies \(u = cv\). In fact, if \(L(u,v)({x_{0}}) = 0\), \({x_{0}} \in\Omega\), then we consider the two cases \(u({x_{0}}) \ne0\) and \(u({x_{0}}) = 0\), respectively.

(a) If \(u({x_{0}}) \ne0\), then \(\mathit{I} = 0\) and \(\mathit{II} = 0\). One shows by \(\mathit{I} = 0\) that

$$ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert = \frac{u}{ v}\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert . $$
(2.4)

Using \(\mathit{II} = 0\), it implies

$$ \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} = c\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}. $$
(2.5)

Putting (2.5) into (2.4) yields \(u = cv\).

(b) If \(u({x_{0}}) = 0\), then we denote \(S = \{x \in\Omega | {u(x) = 0} \}\) and \(\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial {x_{i}}}} = 0\) a.e. in S. Thus

$$\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {\frac{u}{ v}} \biggr) = \frac{{v\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}} - u\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{2}}}} = 0, $$

which shows \(u = cv\). The proof of Theorem 1.1 is completed. □

Let us address anisotropic Sobolev spaces; see Adams [27], Lu [28], Troisi [29] etc. Given a domain \(\Omega \subset {R^{n}}\), \({p_{i}} > 1\), \(i = 1,2, \ldots,n\). We define two anisotropic Sobolev spaces by

$${W^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}}(\Omega) = \biggl\{ {u \in {W^{1,1}}(\Omega): \frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \in{L^{{p_{i}}}}(\Omega),i = 1, \ldots,n} \biggr\} $$

and

$$W_{0}^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}(\Omega) = \biggl\{ {u \in W_{0}^{1,1}( \Omega):\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \in{L^{{p_{i}}}}(\Omega),i = 1, \ldots,n} \biggr\} , $$

with the norms

$${\Vert u \Vert _{{W^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}}(\Omega)}} = \int _{\Omega}{ \vert u \vert \,dx} + \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl( { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}\,dx} } \biggr)}^{\frac{1}{{{p_{i}}}}}}} $$

and

$${\Vert u \Vert _{W_{0}^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}(\Omega)}} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl( { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}\,dx} } \biggr)}^{\frac{1}{{{p_{i}}}}}}} , $$

respectively. Note that \(W_{0}^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}(\Omega)\) is the closure of \(C_{0}^{\infty}(\Omega)\) in \({W^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}}(\Omega)\). It is well known that \({W^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}}(\Omega)\) and \(W_{0}^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}(\Omega)\) are both separable and reflexive Banach spaces.

We will show a Sturmian comparison principle to the anisotropic elliptic equation by Theorem 1.1.

Proposition 2.1

Let \({f_{1}}(x)\) and \({f_{2}}(x)\) be two continuous functions with \({f_{1}}(x) < {f_{2}}(x)\) in the bounded domain Ω. Assume that there exists a positive function \(u \in W_{0}^{1, ( {{p_{i}}} )}(\Omega)\) satisfying

$$ \left \{ { \textstyle\begin{array}{l@{\quad}l} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{\partial}{{\partial{x_{i}}}} ( {{{\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}} \vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial{x_{i}}}}} ) = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{f_{1}}(x)} {u^{{p_{i}} - 1}}} , & x \in\Omega, \\ u > 0, & x \in\Omega, \\ u = 0, & x \in\partial\Omega. \end{array}\displaystyle } \right . $$
(2.6)

Then any nontrivial solution v to the following anisotropic elliptic equation:

$$ - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr) = \sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{f_{2}}(x)} } {u^{{p_{i}}}},\quad x \in\Omega, $$
(2.7)

must change sign.

Proof

Suppose that v to (2.7) does not change sign, without loss of generality, let \(v > 0\) in Ω. By (2.6), (2.7), and (1.7), we observe

$$\begin{aligned} 0&\leq \int_{\Omega}{L(u,v)\,dx} = \int_{\Omega}{R(u,v)\,dx} \\ & = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int _{\Omega}{\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr){{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \,dx} \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int _{\Omega}{\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr)\,dx} } \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{ \bigl( {{f_{1}}(x) - {f_{2}}(x)} \bigr){u^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} \\ &< 0, \end{aligned}$$

which is a contradiction. This completes the proof. □

Proof of Theorem 1.3

To prove Theorem 1.3, we need a lemma from Theorem 1.1.

Lemma 3.1

If there exist a constant \({k_{i}} > 0\) and a function \({h_{i}}(x)\), \(i = 1, \ldots,n\), such that a differentiable function \(v>0\) in the set Ω satisfies

$$ - \frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr) \geq{k_{i}} {h_{i}}(x){v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}, $$
(3.1)

then, for any \(0 \leq u \in C_{0}^{1}(\Omega)\), we have

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} \geq\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{k_{i}} \int_{\Omega}{{h_{i}}(x){u^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx}. $$
(3.2)

Proof

By (3.1) and (1.7), we see

$$\begin{aligned} 0&\leq \int_{\Omega}{L(u,v)\,dx} = \int_{\Omega}{R(u,v)\,dx} \\ & = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int _{\Omega}{\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}} \biggr){{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \,dx} \\ &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} + \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int _{\Omega}{\frac{{{u^{{p_{i}}}}}}{ {{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}\frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{ \biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr)\,dx} } \\ &\leq\sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int_{\Omega}{{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{k_{i}} \int _{\Omega}{{h_{i}}(x){u^{{p_{i}}}}} \,dx}, \end{aligned}$$

which implies (3.2). □

Proof of Theorem 1.3

Without loss of generality, we let \(0 \leq u \in C_{0}^{\infty}\). To use Lemma 3.1, we introduce the auxiliary function

$$ v = \prod_{j = 1}^{n} {{{ \vert {{x_{j}}} \vert }^{{\beta_{j}}}}} : = {\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert ^{{\beta_{i}}}} {\overline{v} _{i}}, $$
(3.3)

where \({\beta_{j}} = \frac{{{p_{j}} - 1}}{{{p_{j}}}}\) and \({\overline{v} _{i}} = \prod_{j = 1,j \ne i}^{n} {{{\vert {{x_{j}}} \vert }^{{\beta_{j}}}}} \), hence

$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} = {\beta_{i}} {\bar{v}_{i}} {\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert ^{{\beta_{i}} - 2}} {x_{i}}, \\& {\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert ^{{p_{i}} - 2}}= { \beta_{i}}^{{p_{i}} - 2}{\bar{v}_{i}}^{{{p_{i}} - 2}}{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert ^{{\beta_{i}}{p_{i}} - 2{\beta _{i}} - {p_{i}} + 2}}, \\& {\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert ^{{p_{i}} - 2}} \frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} = {\beta_{i}}^{{p_{i}} - 1}{\overline{v} _{i}}^{{{p_{i}} - 1}}{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert ^{{\beta_{i}}{p_{i}} - {\beta_{i}} - {p_{i}}}} {x_{i}}, \end{aligned}$$

and

$$ - \frac{\partial}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}} \biggl( {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{{p_{i}} - 2}}\frac{{\partial v}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr) = { \biggl( { \frac{{{p_{i}} - 1}}{ {{p_{i}}}}} \biggr)^{{p_{i}}}}\frac{{{v^{{p_{i}} - 1}}}}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{{p_{i}}}}}}. $$
(3.4)

Taking \({k_{i}} = { ( {\frac{{{p_{i}} - 1}}{{{p_{i}}}}} )^{{p_{i}}}}\) and \({h_{i}}(x) = \frac{1}{{{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{{p_{i}}}}}}\), and using Lemma 3.1, we obtain (1.8). □

Corollary 3.2

For \(u \in C_{0}^{1} ( A )\), it follows that

$$ \int_{A} {{{\vert {\nabla u} \vert }^{2}}} \,dx \geq\frac{{{n^{2}}}}{ 4} \int_{A } {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{2}}}}{ {{{\vert x \vert }^{2}}}}} \,dx. $$
(3.5)

Proof

Letting \({p_{i}} = 2\) (\(i = 1, \ldots,n\)) in (1.8) and noting the elementary inequality

$$ n{ \Biggl( {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \frac{1}{ {{a_{i}}}}} } \Biggr)^{ - 1}} \leq\frac{1}{ n} \Biggl( {\sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{a_{i}}} } \Biggr) \quad \mbox{for } {a_{i}} \geq0,i = 1, \ldots,n, $$
(3.6)

we have by taking \({a_{i}} = {\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert ^{2}}\),

$$\begin{aligned} \int_{A} {{{\vert {\nabla u} \vert }^{2}}} \,dx &= \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \int _{A} {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{2}}} \,dx} \\ & \geq\frac{1}{ 4} \int_{A} {{{\vert u \vert }^{2}} \Biggl( {\sum _{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{1}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{2}}}}} } \Biggr)} \,dx \\ &\geq\frac{1}{ 4} \int_{A} {{{\vert u \vert }^{2}} \biggl( { \frac{{{n^{2}}}}{ {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{2}}} }}} \biggr)} \,dx \\ &= \frac{{{n^{2}}}}{ 4} \int_{A} {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{2}}}}{ {{{\vert x \vert }^{2}}}}} \,dx. \end{aligned}$$

 □

Corollary 3.3

If \(p > 2\), then, for \(u \in C_{0}^{1} ( {A} )\), it follows that

$$ \int_{A} {{{\vert {\nabla u} \vert }^{p}}} \,dx \geq{ \biggl( {\frac{{p - 1}}{ p}} \biggr)^{p}} {n^{\frac{{p + 2}}{2}}} \int_{A} {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{p}}}}{ {{{\vert x \vert }^{p}}}}} \,dx. $$
(3.7)

Proof

Let \({p_{i}} = p > 2\) (\(i = 1, \ldots,n\)) in (1.8). Recall the inequality

$$\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{a_{i}}^{2}} \leq{ \Biggl( {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{a_{i}}^{p}} } \Biggr)^{\frac{2}{p}}} {n^{\frac{{p - 2}}{p}}} \quad \mbox{for } {a_{i}} \geq0,i = 1, \ldots,n, $$

which gives

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{a_{i}}^{p}} \geq{n^{ - \frac{{p - 2}}{2}}} { \Biggl( {\sum _{i = 1}^{n} {{a_{i}}^{2}} } \Biggr)^{\frac{p}{2}}}. $$
(3.8)

Taking \({a_{i}} = \frac{1}{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }}\) in (3.8), it implies by (3.6) that

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} { \frac{1}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{p}}}}} \geq{n^{ - \frac{{p - 2}}{2}}} { \Biggl( {\sum _{i = 1}^{n} {\frac{1}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{2}}}}} } \Biggr)^{\frac{p}{2}}} \geq{n^{ - \frac{{p - 2}}{2}}} { \biggl( {\frac{{{n^{2}}}}{ {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{2}}} }}} \biggr)^{\frac{p}{2}}} = {n^{\frac{{p + 2}}{2}}}\frac{1}{ {{{\vert x \vert }^{p}}}}. $$
(3.9)

Putting (3.9) into the right-hand side of (1.8),

$$ \sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{ \biggl( { \frac{{p - 1}}{ p}} \biggr)}^{p}} \int_{A} {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{p}}}}{ {{{\vert {{x_{i}}} \vert }^{p}}}}} \,dx} \geq{ \biggl( { \frac{{p - 1}}{ p}} \biggr)^{p}} {n^{\frac{{p + 2}}{2}}} \int_{A} {\frac{{{{\vert u \vert }^{p}}}}{ {{{\vert x \vert }^{p}}}}} \,dx. $$
(3.10)

On the other hand,

$$ \int_{A} {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{p}}} } \,dx \leq \int_{A } {{{ \Biggl( {\sum_{i = 1}^{n} {{{\biggl\vert {\frac{{\partial u}}{ {\partial{x_{i}}}}} \biggr\vert }^{2}}} } \Biggr)}^{\frac{p}{2}}}} \,dx = \int_{A } {{{\vert {\nabla u} \vert }^{p}}} \,dx. $$
(3.11)

Hence (3.7) is proved via (3.10) and (3.11). □

References

  1. Belloni, M, Kawohl, B: The pseudo-p-Laplace eigenvalue problem and viscosity solutions as \(p \to\infty\). ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 10(1), 28-52 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lions, JL: Quelques Methodes de Resolution des Problemes aux Limites Non Lineaires. Dunod, Paris (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang, Q: Regularity of minimizer of non-isotropic integrals of the calculus of variations. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 164(1), 77-87 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Antontsev, SN, Díaz, JI, Shmarev, S: Energy Methods for Free Boundary Problems: Applications to Nonlinear PDEs and Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bear, J: Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. Elsevier, New York (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Weickert, J: Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing. Teubner, Stuttgart (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves, CO, El Hamidi, A: Existence of solution for a anisotropic equation with critical exponent. Differ. Integral Equ. 21(1-2), 25-40 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cianchi, A: Symmetrization in anisotropic elliptic problems. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 32(5), 693-717 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cîrstea, FC, Vétois, J: Fundamental solutions for anisotropic elliptic equations: existence and a priori estimates. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 40(4), 727-765 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Di Castro, A, Montefusco, E: Nonlinear eigenvalues for anisotropic quasilinear degenerate elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 70(11), 4093-4105 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fragalà, I, Gazzola, F, Kawohl, B: Existence and nonexistence results for anisotropic quasilinear elliptic equations. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 21(5), 715-734 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Innamorati, A, Leonetti, F: Global integrability for weak solutions to some anisotropic elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 113(5), 430-434 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lieberman, GM: Gradient estimates for anisotropic elliptic equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 10(7), 767-812 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Liskevich, V, Skrypnik, II: Hölder continuity of solutions to an anisotropic elliptic equation. Nonlinear Anal. 71(5-6), 1699-1708 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tersenov, AS, Tersenov, AS: The problem of Dirichlet for anisotropic quasilinear degenerate elliptic equations. J. Differ. Equ. 235(2), 376-396 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Picone, M: Sui valori eccezionali di un parametro da cui dipende un’equazione differenziale lineare ordinaria del second’ordine. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. 11, 1-144 (1910)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Picone, M: Un teorema sulle soluzioni delle equazioni lineari ellittiche autoaggiunte alle derivate parziali del secondo-ordine. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei, Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. 20, 213-219 (1911)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Allegretto, W: Sturmianian theorems for second order systems. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 94(2), 291-296 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Allegretto, W, Huang, Y: A Picone’s identity for the p-Laplacian and applications. Nonlinear Anal. 32(7), 819-830 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunninger, DR: A Sturm comparison theorem for some degenerate quasilinear elliptic operators. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., A 9, 117-121 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bal, K: Generalized Picone’s identity and its applications. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2013, 243 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Dwivedi, G, Tyagi, J: Remarks on the qualitative questions for biharmonic operators. Taiwan. J. Math. 19(6), 1743-1758 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Dwivedi, G, Tyagi, J: Picone’s identity for biharmonic operators on Heisenberg group and its applications. NoDEA Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl. 23(2), 1-26 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Niu, P, Zhang, H, Wang, Y: Hardy type and Rellich type inequalities on the Heisenberg group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 129(129), 3623-3630 (2001)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyagi, J: A nonlinear Picone’s identity and its applications. Appl. Math. Lett. 26(6), 624-626 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaroš, J: Caccioppoli estimates through an anisotropic Picone’s identity. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143(3), 1137-1144 (2015)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Adams, RA: Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press, New York (1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu, W: On embedding theorem of spaces of functions with partial derivatives summable with different powers. Vestn. Leningr. State Univ. 7, 23-37 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Troisi, M: Teoremi di inclusione per spazi di Sobolev non isotropi. Ric. Mat. 18(1), 3-24 (1969)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11271299), and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2016JM1203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuewei Cui.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Both authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, T., Cui, X. Anisotropic Picone identities and anisotropic Hardy inequalities. J Inequal Appl 2017, 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1292-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1292-4

MSC

  • 26D10
  • 26D15

Keywords

  • anisotropic Picone identity
  • anisotropic Hardy type inequality
  • anisotropic elliptic equation
  • Sturmian comparison principle