- Research
- Open Access
- Published:

# Forced oscillation of second-order differential equations with mixed nonlinearities

*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*
**volume 2014**, Article number: 520 (2014)

## Abstract

We study oscillatory behavior of a class of second-order forced differential equations with mixed nonlinearities. Some new oscillation theorems are presented that improve and complement those related results given in the literature. An example is provided to illustrate the main results.

**MSC:**34K11.

## 1 Introduction

This paper is concerned with the oscillation of solutions to a class of second-order forced differential equations with mixed nonlinearities

where t\ge {t}_{0}>0, n\ge 1 is a natural number, {\beta}_{i}\ge 1 (i=1,2,\dots ,n) are constants, r\in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),\mathbb{R}), {q}_{j},{\tau}_{j},e\in \mathrm{C}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),\mathbb{R}), r(t)>0, {r}^{\prime}(t)\ge 0, {q}_{j}(t)\ge 0 (j=0,1,2,\dots ,n), e(t)\le 0. We also assume that there exists a function \tau \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),\mathbb{R}) such that \tau (t)\le {\tau}_{j}(t) (j=0,1,2,\dots ,n), \tau (t)\le t, {lim}_{t\to \mathrm{\infty}}\tau (t)=\mathrm{\infty}, and {\tau}^{\prime}(t)>0.

We consider only those solutions *x* of equation (1.1) which satisfy condition sup\{|x(t)|:t\ge T\}>0 for all T\ge {t}_{0}. We assume that (1.1) possesses such solutions. As usual, a solution of (1.1) is called oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on the interval [{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}); otherwise, it is termed nonoscillatory. Equation (1.1) is said to be oscillatory if all its solutions are oscillatory.

Functional differential equations arise in many applied problems in natural sciences, technology, and automatic control; see, for instance, Hale [1]. In mechanical and engineering problems, questions related to the existence of oscillatory and nonoscillatory solutions play an important role. As a result, many theoretical studies have been undertaken during the past few years. We refer the reader to [2–12] and the references cited therein.

In what follows, we briefly comment on the related results that motivate our study. Li and Cheng [9] studied a differential equation

Zheng *et al.* [11] considered the equation

Equation (1.1) was studied by Zhong *et al.* [12] who established the following oscillation theorem.

**Theorem 1.1** (see [[12], Theorem 3.1])

*Assume that*

*and there exists a function*
\rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty}))
*such that*

*where*

*and*

*Then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

The purpose of this paper is to refine Theorem 1.1 in some cases and analyze the oscillatory behavior of solutions to (1.1) in the case when the integral in (1.2) is finite. This paper proceeds as follows: in Section 2, we present our main results; in Section 3, an example is provided to illustrate the results obtained.

## 2 Oscillation criteria

In what follows, all functional inequalities are tacitly assumed to hold eventually, that is, for all *t* large enough. Before stating the main results, we begin with the following lemma.

**Lemma 2.1** (Bernoulli’s inequality)

*For* y\ge -1 *and* \gamma \ge 1,

**Theorem 2.2** *Assume that condition* (1.2) *is satisfied*, *and let*

*If there exists a function* \rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty})) *such that*, *for all constants* M>0,

*where* {\rho}_{+}^{\prime} *is defined as in* (1.4), *then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

*Proof* Assume that (1.1) has a nonoscillatory solution *x*. Without loss of generality, we can assume that *x* is an eventually positive solution, *i.e.*, there exists a {t}_{1}\ge {t}_{0} such that x(t)>0 for t\ge {t}_{1}. Equation (1.1) yields

With a proof similar to that of [[12], Theorem 3.1], we conclude that

For t\ge {t}_{1}, define a function

Then u(t)>0 for t\ge {t}_{1}. Differentiating (2.5), by virtue of (2.3) and (2.4), we have {x}^{\prime}(\tau (t))\ge r(t){x}^{\prime}(t)/r(\tau (t)), and so

Let y:=x({\tau}_{i}(t))-1. It follows from Lemma 2.1 that

Hence, we deduce that

By virtue of (2.4), there exists a constant M>0 such that

Thus, by (2.8), we obtain

Substitution of (2.9) into (2.6) implies that

Integrating the latter inequality from {t}_{1} to *t*, we conclude that

which contradicts (2.2). This completes the proof. □

On the basis of Theorem 2.2, we can obtain the following results due to condition (2.1).

**Corollary 2.3** *Assume that conditions* (1.2) *and* (2.1) *are satisfied*. *If there exists a function* \rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty})) *such that*

*where* {\rho}_{+}^{\prime} *is defined as in* (1.4), *then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

Using \rho (t)=t in Corollary 2.3, we can get the following criterion.

**Corollary 2.4** *Assume that conditions* (1.2) *and* (2.1) *are satisfied*. *If*

*then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

In what follows, we derive some oscillation criteria for (1.1) in the case where

**Theorem 2.5** *Assume that conditions* (2.1) *and* (2.10) *are satisfied*, *and let* {\tau}_{j}(t)\le t (j=0,1,2,\dots ,n). *Suppose also that there exists a function* \rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty})) *such that* (2.2) *holds*. *If*

*holds for all constants* K>0, *where*

*then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

*Proof* Assume that (1.1) has a nonoscillatory solution *x*. As above, we may assume that there is a {t}_{1}\ge {t}_{0} such that x(t)>0 for t\ge {t}_{1}. By virtue of (1.1), we have (2.3). Then there exist two possible cases, *i.e.*, {x}^{\prime}(t)>0 or

Assume first that {x}^{\prime}(t)>0. Then we obtain (2.4). Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2.2, we can obtain a contradiction to (2.2). Suppose now that (2.13) holds. Define a new function *ω* by

Then \omega (t)<0 for t\ge {t}_{1} and

On the other hand, we have (2.7), and so

due to {\tau}_{i}(t)\le t (i=1,2,\dots ,n). By (2.13), there exists a constant K>0 such that x(t)\le K. Hence, by virtue of (2.16), we conclude that

It follows now from (2.15), (2.17), and {\tau}_{0}(t)\le t that

Using the condition {(r{x}^{\prime})}^{\prime}(t)\le 0, we have, for s\ge t,

Integrating the latter inequality from *t* to *l*, we deduce that

Passing to the limit as l\to \mathrm{\infty}, we have

which yields

*i.e.*,

Multiplying (2.18) by \delta (t) and integrating the resulting inequality from {t}_{1} to *t*, we obtain

Hence, we derive from (2.19) that

which contradicts (2.11). The proof is complete. □

**Theorem 2.6** *Assume that conditions* (2.1) *and* (2.10) *are satisfied*, *and let* {\tau}_{j}(t)\ge t (j=0,1,2,\dots ,n). *Suppose further that there exists a function* \rho \in {\mathrm{C}}^{1}([{t}_{0},\mathrm{\infty}),(0,\mathrm{\infty})) *such that* (2.2) *holds*. *If*, *for all constants* K>0,

*where* *δ* *is as in* (2.12), *then equation* (1.1) *is oscillatory*.

*Proof* Assume again that there exists a {t}_{1}\ge {t}_{0} such that x(t)>0 for t\ge {t}_{1}. From (1.1), we have (2.3). Then there exist two possible cases, *i.e.*, {x}^{\prime}(t)>0 or (2.13). Suppose that {x}^{\prime}(t)>0. Following the same lines as in Theorem 2.2, we can obtain a contradiction to (2.2). Assume now that (2.13) is satisfied. Define the function *ω* by (2.14). We have \omega (t)<0 for t\ge {t}_{1} and (2.15). On the other hand, it has been established in Theorems 2.2 and 2.5 that (2.7) and (2.19) hold. By virtue of (2.19),

It follows from the latter inequality, {\tau}_{j}(t)\ge t (j=0,1,2,\dots ,n), and (2.7) that

and

Since {x}^{\prime}(t)<0, there exists a constant K>0 such that x(t)\le K. Hence, by (2.22), we conclude that

Using (2.15), (2.21), and (2.23), we obtain

The remainder of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 2.5 and hence is omitted. This completes the proof. □

**Remark 2.7** From the proof of Theorems 2.5 and 2.6, one can obtain oscillation results for equation (1.1) with delayed and advanced arguments. The details are left to the reader.

## 3 Example

The following example illustrates possible applications of the theoretical results presented in this paper.

**Example 3.1** For t\ge 1, consider a second-order differential equation

where \gamma >0 is a constant. Let n=2, r(t)=1, {q}_{0}(t)=\gamma /{t}^{2}, {q}_{1}(t)={q}_{2}(t)=1/{t}^{2}, {\tau}_{0}(t)=t/2, {\tau}_{1}(t)=t/5, \tau (t)={\tau}_{2}(t)=t/40, e(t)=-3/{t}^{2}, {\beta}_{1}=2, and {\beta}_{2}=3. Then {\sum}_{i=1}^{n}(1-{\beta}_{i}){q}_{i}(t)-e(t)=0 and

Hence, by Corollary 2.4, equation (3.1) is oscillatory for any \gamma >5.

Let *Q* be defined as in Theorem 1.1. Then

Using the latter inequality and \rho (t)=t in (1.3), we observe that Theorem 1.1 cannot ensure oscillation of (3.1) on the interval (5,5.073]. Therefore, Corollary 2.4 improves Theorem 1.1.

**Remark 3.2** In this paper, several new oscillation criteria for equation (1.1) are obtained by using the Riccati substitution and Bernoulli’s inequality. Employing inequalities different from those exploited in [12], we improve Theorem 1.1; see Example 3.1. Furthermore, Theorems 2.5 and 2.6 complement those by Zhong *et al.* [12] since our results can be applied to the case where (2.10) holds.

## References

Hale JK:

*Theory of Functional Differential Equations*. Springer, New York; 1977.Agarwal RP, Anderson DR, Zafer A:

**Interval oscillation criteria for second-order forced delay dynamic equations with mixed nonlinearities.***Comput. Math. Appl.*2010,**59:**977-993. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.09.010Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D:

*Oscillation Theory for Difference and Functional Differential Equations*. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2000.Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D:

*Oscillation Theory for Second Order Linear, Half-Linear, Superlinear and Sublinear Dynamic Equations*. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2002.Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D:

**Oscillation criteria for certain***n***th order differential equations with deviating arguments.***J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2001,**262:**601-622. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7571Agarwal RP, Grace SR, O’Regan D:

**The oscillation of certain higher-order functional differential equations.***Math. Comput. Model.*2003,**37:**705-728. 10.1016/S0895-7177(03)00079-7Agarwal RP, Zafer A:

**Oscillation criteria for second-order forced dynamic equations with mixed nonlinearities.***Adv. Differ. Equ.*2009**2009:**Article ID 938706Hassan TS, Erbe L, Peterson A:

**Forced oscillation of second order differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.***Acta Math. Sci.*2011,**31:**613-626. 10.1016/S0252-9602(11)60261-0Li W-T, Cheng SS:

**An oscillation criterion for nonhomogeneous half-linear differential equations.***Appl. Math. Lett.*2002,**15:**259-263. 10.1016/S0893-9659(01)00127-6Sun YG, Wong JSW:

**Oscillation criteria for second order forced ordinary differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.***J. Math. Anal. Appl.*2007,**334:**549-560. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.07.109Zheng ZW, Wang X, Han HM:

**Oscillation criteria for forced second order differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.***Appl. Math. Lett.*2009,**22:**1096-1101. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.01.018Zhong J, Ouyang Z, Zou S:

**An oscillation theorem for a class of second-order forced neutral delay differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.***Appl. Math. Lett.*2011,**24:**1449-1454. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.03.030

## Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the editors and anonymous referees for the careful reading of the original manuscript and useful comments that helped to improve the presentation of the results and accentuate important details. This research is supported by the AMEP of Linyi University, P.R. China.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

All three authors contributed equally to this work. They all read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Wang, Y., Li, T. & Thandapani, E. Forced oscillation of second-order differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.
*J Inequal Appl* **2014**, 520 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-520

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-520

### Keywords

- oscillation
- forced differential equation
- second-order
- mixed nonlinearities