Open Access

On the stability of the heat equation with an initial condition

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20132013:475

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-475

Received: 4 August 2013

Accepted: 1 October 2013

Published: 7 November 2013

Abstract

In this paper, we prove the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the heat equation with an initial condition

{ u ( x , t ) = u t ( x , t ) ( for all  x R n  and  t > 0 ) , u ( x , 0 ) = g ( x ) ( for all  x R n )

in a class of twice continuously differentiable functions under certain conditions.

1 Introduction

Let X be a normed space, and let I be an open interval. If for any function f : I X satisfying the differential inequality
a n ( x ) y ( n ) ( x ) + a n 1 ( x ) y ( n 1 ) ( x ) + + a 1 ( x ) y ( x ) + a 0 ( x ) y ( x ) + h ( x ) ε
for all x I and for some ε 0 there exists a solution f 0 : I X of the differential equation
a n ( x ) y ( n ) ( x ) + a n 1 ( x ) y ( n 1 ) ( x ) + + a 1 ( x ) y ( x ) + a 0 ( x ) y ( x ) + h ( x ) = 0

such that f ( x ) f 0 ( x ) K ( ε ) for any x I , where K ( ε ) is an expression of ε only, then we say that the above differential equation has the Hyers-Ulam stability.

If the above statement is also true when we replace ε and K ( ε ) by φ ( x ) and Φ ( x ) , where φ , Φ : I [ 0 , ) are functions not depending on f and f 0 explicitly, then we say that the corresponding differential equation has the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability. (This type of stability is sometimes called the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability.)

We may apply these terminologies to other differential equations and partial differential equations. For more detailed definitions of the Hyers-Ulam stability and the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability, refer to [18].

Obłoza seems to be the first author who has investigated the Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations (see [9, 10]). Here, we introduce the result of Alsina and Ger (see [1]): If a differentiable function f : I R is a solution of the differential inequality | y ( x ) y ( x ) | ε , where I is an open subinterval of , then there exists a solution f 0 : I R of the differential equation y ( x ) = y ( x ) such that | f ( x ) f 0 ( x ) | 3 ε for any x I . This result was generalized by Miura et al. (see [11, 12]).

In 2007, Jung and Lee [13] proved the Hyers-Ulam stability of the first-order linear partial differential equation
a u x ( x , y ) + b u y ( x , y ) + c u ( x , y ) + d = 0 ,

where a , b R and c , d C are constants with ( c ) 0 . It seems that the first paper dealing with the Hyers-Ulam stability of partial differential equations was written by Prastaro and Rassias [14]. For a recent result on this subject, refer to [15].

In this paper, using an idea from the papers [16, 17], we investigate the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of the heat equation with an initial value condition
{ u ( x , t ) = u t ( x , t ) ( for all  x R n  and  t > 0 ) , u ( x , 0 ) = g ( x ) ( for all  x R n )
(1.1)

in the class of radially symmetric functions, where denotes the Laplace operator. The heat equation plays an important role in a number of fields of science. It is strongly related to the Brownian motion in probability theory. The heat equation is also connected with chemical diffusion, and it is sometimes called the diffusion equation.

2 Main result

For a given integer n 2 , x i denotes the i th coordinate of any point x in R n , i.e., x = ( x 1 , , x i , , x n ) . We assume that t 1 is a constant with 0 < t 1 , and we define
T : = { t R 0 < t < t 1 } and | x | : = x 1 2 + + x n 2 .
Due to an idea from [[18], Section 2.3.1], we may search for a solution of (1.1) of the form u ( x , t ) = ( 1 / t n / 2 ) v ( | x | / t 1 / 2 ) for some function v. Based on this argument, we define
U : = { u : R n × T R u ( x , t ) = 1 t n / 2 w ( r )  for all  x R n , t T  and for some function  w : [ 0 , ) R  with  r = | x | t 1 / 2  and  lim r r n w ( r ) = lim r r n 1 w ( r ) = 0 } .
Theorem 2.1 Let φ 1 , φ 2 : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) and ψ : T [ 0 , ) be functions such that
D : = 0 e u 2 / 4 u n 1 u s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s d u < ,
(2.1)
c : = inf t T t n / 2 + 1 ψ ( t ) > 0 .
(2.2)
Assume that g : R n R is a function with g C ( R n ) L ( R n ) . If a twice continuously differentiable function u U satisfies
{ | u ( x , t ) u t ( x , t ) | φ 1 ( | x | t 1 / 2 ) ψ ( t ) ( for all x R n and t T ) | u ( x , 0 ) g ( x ) | φ 2 ( | x | ) ( for all x R n ) ,
(2.3)
then there exist solutions u 0 , u 1 : R n × T R of the heat equation and a real number γ such that
| u ( x , t ) γ u 0 ( x , t ) | c D t n / 2 e | x | 2 / 4 t ,
(2.4)
| R n u ( x y , t ) g ( y ) d y γ u 1 ( x , t ) | ( 4 π ) n / 2 c D R n u 0 ( x y , t ) | g ( y ) | d y
(2.5)
for all x R n and t T with | x | / t 1 / 2 > 0 , where
u 0 ( x , t ) : = 1 ( 4 π t ) n / 2 e | x | 2 / 4 t and u 1 ( x , t ) : = R n u 0 ( x y , t ) g ( y ) d y .
(2.6)
Proof Since u ( x , t ) U , there exists a function w : [ 0 , ) R such that
u ( x , t ) = 1 t n / 2 w ( r )
for any x R n and t T , where we set r = | x | / t 1 / 2 . Using this notation, we calculate u t and u:
u t ( x , t ) = n 2 t n / 2 + 1 w ( r ) 1 2 t n / 2 + 1 r w ( r ) , u x i ( x , t ) = 1 t n / 2 + 1 / 2 w ( r ) x i | x | , u x i x i ( x , t ) = 1 t n / 2 + 1 / 2 ( 1 t 1 / 2 w ( r ) x i 2 | x | 2 + w ( r ) ( 1 | x | x i 2 | x | 3 ) ) .
So, we have
u ( x , t ) u t ( x , t ) = 1 t n / 2 + 1 ( w ( r ) + n 1 r w ( r ) + r 2 w ( r ) + n 2 w ( r ) ) = 1 r n 1 1 t n / 2 + 1 ( ( r n 1 w ( r ) + ( n 1 ) r n 2 w ( r ) ) + 1 2 ( r n w ( r ) + n r n 1 w ( r ) ) ) = 1 r n 1 1 t n / 2 + 1 ( r n 1 w ( r ) + r n 2 w ( r ) )
for all x R n , t T with r > 0 . Moreover, from the last equality and (2.3), it follows that
| u ( x , t ) u t ( x , t ) | = 1 r n 1 1 t n / 2 + 1 | ( r n 1 w ( r ) + r n 2 w ( r ) ) | φ 1 ( r ) ψ ( t )
or
| ( r n 1 w ( r ) + r n 2 w ( r ) ) | r n 1 φ 1 ( r ) t n / 2 + 1 ψ ( t )
for all r > 0 and t T . In view of (2.2), we have
c r n 1 φ 1 ( r ) ( r n 1 w ( r ) + r n 2 w ( r ) ) c r n 1 φ 1 ( r )

for any r > 0 .

We integrate each term of the last inequality from r to ∞ and take account of the definition of U to get
c r s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s r n 1 w ( r ) r n 2 w ( r ) c r s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s
or
| w ( r ) + r 2 w ( r ) | c r n 1 r s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s

for all r > 0 .

According to [[19], Theorem 1], together with (2.1), there exists a (unique) constant γ R such that
| w ( r ) γ ( 4 π ) n / 2 e r 2 / 4 | c e r 2 / 4 r e u 2 / 4 u n 1 u s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s d u
for all r > 0 , or equivalently
| u ( x , t ) γ ( 4 π t ) n / 2 e | x | 2 / 4 t | c t n / 2 e | x | 2 / 4 t | x | / t 1 / 2 e u 2 / 4 u n 1 u s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s d u

for all x R n and t T with | x | / t 1 / 2 > 0 , which proves the validity of inequality (2.4), and in view of (2.6), it is not difficult to prove that u 0 ( x , t ) is a solution of the heat equation, i.e., u 0 ( x , t ) t u 0 ( x , t ) = 0 .

If we replace x with x y and multiply each term by | g ( y ) | , and if we integrate all terms in the last inequality over R n , then we obtain
( 4 π ) n / 2 c D R n u 0 ( x y , t ) | g ( y ) | d y R n u ( x y , t ) g ( y ) d y γ R n u 0 ( x y , t ) g ( y ) d y ( 4 π ) n / 2 c D R n u 0 ( x y , t ) | g ( y ) | d y
for all x , y R n and t T . If we define u 1 ( x , t ) as in (2.6) for any x R n and t T , following the proof of [[18], Theorem 1 in Section 2.3], we can then easily prove that
u 1 ( x , t ) t u 1 ( x , t ) = 0

for all x R n and t T with | x | / t 1 / 2 > 0 , which shows the validity of inequality (2.5). □

Remark 2.2
  1. (i)

    The linearity of solutions of heat equation (1.1) implies that γ u 0 ( x , t ) and γ u 1 ( x , t ) are also solutions of the heat equation.

     
  2. (ii)
    As in the proof of [[18], Theorem 1 in Section 2.3], we can show that
    lim ( x , t ) ( x 0 , 0 ) x R n , t > 0 u 1 ( x , t ) = g ( x 0 )

    for each x 0 R n .

     
  3. (iii)
    If a function φ 1 : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) satisfies
    u s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s = O ( u n e α u 2 )
    for all u 0 and for some α > 1 / 4 , then there exists a positive number A such that
    D = 0 e u 2 / 4 u n 1 u s n 1 φ 1 ( s ) d s d u 0 A u e ( 1 / 4 α ) u 2 d u = 2 A 4 α 1 < ,

    i.e., φ 1 satisfies condition (2.1).

     

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2013R1A1A2005557).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Mathematics Section, College of Science and Technology, Hongik University

References

  1. Alsina C, Ger R: On some inequalities and stability results related to the exponential function. J. Inequal. Appl. 1998, 2: 373–380.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Brillouet-Belluot N, Brzdek J, Cieplinski K: On some recent developments in Ulam’s type stability. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 716936 10.1155/2012/716936Google Scholar
  3. Czerwik S: Functional Equations and Inequalities in Several Variables. World Scientific, River Edge; 2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1941, 27: 222–224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias TM: Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables. Birkhäuser, Boston; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jung S-M Springer Optimization and Its Applications 48. In Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Nonlinear Analysis. Springer, New York; 2011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rassias TM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1978, 72: 297–300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ulam SM: Problems in Modern Mathematics. Wiley, New York; 1964.Google Scholar
  9. Obłoza M: Hyers stability of the linear differential equation. Rocznik Nauk.-Dydakt. Prace Mat. 1993, 13: 259–270.Google Scholar
  10. Obłoza M: Connections between Hyers and Lyapunov stability of the ordinary differential equations. Rocznik Nauk.-Dydakt. Prace Mat. 1997, 14: 141–146.Google Scholar
  11. Miura T, Jung S-M, Takahasi S-E: Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of the Banach space valued linear differential equations y = λ y . J. Korean Math. Soc. 2004, 41: 995–1005. 10.4134/JKMS.2004.41.6.995MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Takahasi S-E, Miura T, Miyajima S: On the Hyers-Ulam stability of the Banach space-valued differential equation y = λ y . Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2002, 39: 309–315. 10.4134/BKMS.2002.39.2.309MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jung S-M, Lee K-S: Hyers-Ulam stability of first order linear partial differential equations with constant coefficients. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10: 261–266.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Prastaro A, Rassias TM: Ulam stability in geometry of PDE’s. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. Appl. 2003, 8: 259–278.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Lungu N, Popa D: Hyers-Ulam stability of a first order partial differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 385: 86–91. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.06.025MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hegyi B, Jung S-M: On the stability of Laplace’s equation. Appl. Math. Lett. 2013, 26: 549–552. 10.1016/j.aml.2012.12.014MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hegyi, B, Jung, S-M: On the stability of heat equation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (in press)Google Scholar
  18. Evans LC Graduate Studies in Mathematics 19. In Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence; 1998.Google Scholar
  19. Jung S-M: Hyers-Ulam stability of linear differential equations of first order, II. Appl. Math. Lett. 2006, 19: 854–858. 10.1016/j.aml.2005.11.004MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jung; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.