# Coefficient estimates for new subclasses of Ma-Minda bi-univalent functions

## Abstract

In this paper, we introduce and investigate two new subclasses ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ and ${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ of Ma-Minda bi-univalent functions defined by using subordination in the open unit disk $D=\left\{zâˆˆC:|z|<1\right\}$. For functions belonging to these new subclasses, we obtain estimates for the initial coefficients $|{a}_{2}|$ and $|{a}_{3}|$. The results presented in this paper would generalize those in related works of several earlier authors.

MSC:30C45, 30C80.

## Dedication

Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava

## 1 Introduction

Let C be a set of complex numbers and let $N=\left\{1,2,3,â€¦\right\}={N}_{0}âˆ–\left\{0\right\}$ be a set of positive integers. Let A be a class of functions of the form

$f\left(z\right)=z+\underset{n=2}{\overset{\mathrm{âˆž}}{âˆ‘}}{a}_{n}{z}^{n},$
(1.1)

which are analytic in the open unit disk $D=\left\{zâˆˆC:|z|<1\right\}$. Also, let S denote a subclass of all functions in A which are univalent in D (for details, see [1, 2]).

Since univalent functions are one-to-one, they are invertible and the inverse functions need not be defined on the entire unit disk D. However, the famous Koebe one-quarter theorem [1] ensures that the image of the unit disk D under every function $fâˆˆS$ contains a disk of radius 1/4. Thus, every univalent function $fâˆˆS$ has an inverse ${f}^{âˆ’1}$ satisfying

${f}^{âˆ’1}\left(f\left(z\right)\right)=z\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(zâˆˆD\right)$

and

$f\left({f}^{âˆ’1}\left(w\right)\right)=w\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(|w|<{r}_{0}\left(f\right);{r}_{0}\left(f\right)â‰¥\frac{1}{4}\right),$

where

${f}^{âˆ’1}\left(w\right)=wâˆ’{a}_{2}{w}^{2}+\left(2{a}_{2}^{2}âˆ’{a}_{3}\right){w}^{3}âˆ’\left(5{a}_{2}^{3}âˆ’5{a}_{2}{a}_{3}+{a}_{4}\right){w}^{4}+â‹¯.$
(1.2)

A function $fâˆˆA$ is said to be bi-univalent in D if both f and ${f}^{âˆ’1}$ are univalent in D. Let Ïƒ denote the class of bi-univalent functions defined in the unit disk D. In 1967, Lewin [3] first introduced the class Ïƒ of bi-univalent functions and showed that $|{a}_{2}|â‰¤1.51$ for every $fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}$. Subsequently, Branan and Clunie [4] conjectured that $|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\sqrt{2}$ for $fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}$. Later, Netanyahu [5] proved that ${max}_{fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}}|{a}_{2}|=3/4$. The coefficient estimate problem for each of $|{a}_{n}|$ ($nâˆˆNâˆ–\left\{1,2\right\}$) is still an open problem.

Brannan and Taha [6] (see also [7]) introduced certain subclasses of a bi-univalent function class Ïƒ similar to the familiar subclasses ${S}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ and $K\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ of starlike and convex functions of order Î± ($0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$), respectively (see [8]). Thus, following Brannan and Taha [6] (see also [7]), a function $fâˆˆA$ is in the class ${S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left[\mathrm{Î±}\right]$ of strongly bi-starlike functions of order Î± ($0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$) if both functions f and ${f}^{âˆ’1}$ are strongly starlike functions of order Î±. The classes ${S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ and ${K}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ of bi-starlike functions of order Î± and bi-convex functions of order Î±, corresponding (respectively) to the function classes ${S}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ and $K\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$, were also introduced analogously. For each of the function classes ${S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ and ${K}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$, they found non-sharp estimates on the first two Taylor-Maclaurin coefficients $|{a}_{2}|$ and $|{a}_{3}|$ (for details, see [6, 7]).

An analytic function f is subordinate to an analytic function g, written $fâ‰ºg$, if there is an analytic function w with $|w\left(z\right)|â‰¤|z|$ such that $f=\left(g\left(w\right)\right)$. If g is univalent, then $fâ‰ºg$ if and only if $f\left(0\right)=g\left(0\right)$ and $f\left(D\right)âŠ†g\left(D\right)$. Ma and Minda [9] unified various subclasses of starlike and convex functions for which either of the quantities $z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)/f\left(z\right)$ or $1+z{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)/{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)$ is subordinate to a more general superordinate function. For this purpose, they considered an analytic function Ï† with positive real part in the unit disk D, $\mathrm{Ï†}\left(0\right)=1$, ${\mathrm{Ï†}}^{â€²}\left(0\right)>0$, and Ï† maps D onto a region starlike with respect to 1 and symmetric with respect to the real axis. The classes ${S}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ and $K\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ of Ma-Minda starlike and Ma-Minda convex functions are respectively characterized by $z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)/f\left(z\right)â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)$ or $1+z{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)/{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)$. A function f is bi-starlike of Ma-Minda type or bi-convex of Ma-Minda type if both f and ${f}^{âˆ’1}$ are respectively Ma-Minda starlike or convex. These classes are denoted respectively by ${S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ and ${K}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$. Recently, Srivastava et al. [10], Frasin and Aouf [11] and Caglar et al. [12] introduced and investigated various subclasses of bi-univalent functions and found estimates on the coefficients $|{a}_{2}|$ and $|{a}_{3}|$ for functions in these classes. Very recently, Ali et al. [13], Kumar et al. [14], Srivastava et al. [15] and Xu et al.[16] unified and extended some related results in [7, 10â€“12, 17] by generalizing their classes using subordination.

Motivated by Ali et al. [13] and Kumar et al. [14], we investigate the estimates for the initial coefficients $|{a}_{2}|$ and $|{a}_{3}|$ of bi-univalent functions of Ma-Minda type belonging to the classes ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ and ${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ defined in Section 2. Our results generalize several well-known results in [10â€“14] and these are also pointed out.

## 2 Coefficient estimates

Throughout this paper, we assume that Ï† is an analytic univalent function with positive real part in D, $\mathrm{Ï†}\left(D\right)$ is symmetric with respect to the real axis and starlike with respect to $\mathrm{Ï†}\left(0\right)=1$, and ${\mathrm{Ï†}}^{â€²}\left(0\right)>0$. Such a function has series expansion of the form

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)=1+{B}_{1}z+{B}_{2}{z}_{2}+{B}_{3}{z}_{3}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left({B}_{1}>0\right).$
(2.1)

With this assumption on Ï†, we now introduce the following subclasses of Ma-Minda bi-univalent functions.

Definition 2.1 A function $fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}$ given by (1.1) is said to be in the class ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ if it satisfies

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1,\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1,zâˆˆD\right)$
(2.2)

and

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{w}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(w\right)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1,\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1,wâˆˆD\right),$
(2.3)

where the function g is given by

$g\left(w\right)={f}^{âˆ’1}\left(w\right)=wâˆ’{a}_{2}{w}^{2}+\left(2{a}_{2}^{2}âˆ’{a}_{3}\right){w}^{3}âˆ’\left(5{a}_{2}^{3}âˆ’5{a}_{2}{a}_{3}+{a}_{4}\right){w}^{4}+â‹¯.$
(2.4)

We note that, for suitable choices Î», Î¼ and Ï†, the class ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ reduces to the following known classes.

1. (1)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},{\left(\frac{1+z}{1âˆ’z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î±}}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$, $0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$, $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$) (see Caglar et al. [[12], Definition 2.1]);

2. (2)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î²}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$, $0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1$, $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$) (see Caglar et al. [[12], Definition 3.1]);

3. (3)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$) (see Kumar et al. [[14], Definition 1.1]);

4. (4)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(1,\mathrm{Ï†}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$) (see Kumar et al. [[14], Definition 2.1]);

5. (5)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(1,\mathrm{Ï†}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ (see Ali et al. [[13], p.345]);

6. (6)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(\mathrm{Î»},{\left(\frac{1+z}{1âˆ’z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î±}}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$, $0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$) (see Frasin and Aouf [[11], Definition 2.1]);

7. (7)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î²}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$, $0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1$) (see Frasin and Aouf [[11], Definition 3.1]);

8. (8)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(1,{\left(\frac{1+z}{1âˆ’z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î±}}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ ($0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$) (see Srivastava et al. [[10], Definition 1]);

9. (9)

${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(1,\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}\right)={H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î²}\right)$ ($0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1$) (see Srivastava et al. [[10], Definition 2]).

For functions in the class ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, the following estimates are obtained.

Theorem 2.1 Let the function f given by (1.1) be in the class ${H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, $\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$ and $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$. Then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}},\sqrt{\frac{2\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}}\right\}$
(2.5)

and

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\left\{\begin{array}{cc}min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}}+\frac{{B}_{1}^{2}}{{\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}^{2}},\frac{2\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}\right\},\hfill & 0â‰¤\mathrm{Î¼}<1,\hfill \\ \frac{{B}_{1}}{2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}}+\frac{2|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)},\hfill & \mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1.\hfill \end{array}$
(2.6)

Proof Since $fâˆˆ{H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, there exist two analytic functions $u,v:Dâ†’D$, with $u\left(0\right)=v\left(0\right)=0$, such that

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(u\left(z\right)\right)$
(2.7)

and

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{w}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(v\left(w\right)\right).$
(2.8)

Define the functions p and q by

$\begin{array}{r}p\left(z\right)=\frac{1+u\left(z\right)}{1âˆ’u\left(z\right)}=1+{p}_{1}z+{p}_{2}{z}^{2}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{and}\\ q\left(z\right)=\frac{1+v\left(z\right)}{1âˆ’v\left(z\right)}=1+{q}_{1}z+{q}_{2}{z}^{2}+â‹¯,\end{array}$
(2.9)

or, equivalently,

$u\left(z\right)=\frac{p\left(z\right)âˆ’1}{p\left(z\right)+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left({p}_{1}z+\left({p}_{2}âˆ’\frac{{p}_{1}^{2}}{2}\right){z}^{2}+â‹¯\right)$
(2.10)

and

$v\left(z\right)=\frac{q\left(z\right)âˆ’1}{q\left(z\right)+1}=\frac{1}{2}\left({q}_{1}z+\left({q}_{2}âˆ’\frac{{q}_{1}^{2}}{2}\right){z}^{2}+â‹¯\right).$
(2.11)

It is clear that p and q are analytic in D and $p\left(0\right)=q\left(0\right)=1$. Since $u,v:Dâ†’D$, the functions p and q have positive real part in D, and hence $|{p}_{i}|â‰¤2$ and $|{q}_{i}|â‰¤2$ ($i=1,2,â€¦$). By virtue of (2.7), (2.8), (2.10) and (2.11), we have

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right){\left(\frac{f\left(z\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{p\left(z\right)âˆ’1}{p\left(z\right)+1}\right)$
(2.12)

and

$\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{w}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}}+\mathrm{Î»}{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right){\left(\frac{g\left(w\right)}{z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{q\left(w\right)âˆ’1}{q\left(w\right)+1}\right).$
(2.13)

Using (2.10), (2.11), together with (2.1), we easily obtain

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{p\left(z\right)âˆ’1}{p\left(z\right)+1}\right)=1+\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{p}_{1}z+\left(\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{p}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{p}_{1}^{2}\right){z}^{2}+â‹¯$
(2.14)

and

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{q\left(w\right)âˆ’1}{q\left(w\right)+1}\right)=1+\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{q}_{1}w+\left(\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({q}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{q}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{q}_{1}^{2}\right){w}^{2}+â‹¯.$
(2.15)

Since $fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}$ has the Maclaurin series given by (1.1), a computation shows that its inverse $g={f}^{âˆ’1}$ has the expansion given by (1.2). Also, since

$\begin{array}{r}{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)=1+2{a}_{2}z+3{a}_{3}{z}^{2}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{and}\\ {g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)=1âˆ’2{a}_{2}w+3\left(2{a}_{2}âˆ’{a}_{3}\right){w}^{2}âˆ’â‹¯,\end{array}$

it follows from (2.12)-(2.15) that

$\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right){a}_{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{p}_{1},$
(2.16)
$\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right){a}_{3}+\frac{\left(\mathrm{Î¼}âˆ’1\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}{2}{a}_{2}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{p}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{p}_{1}^{2},$
(2.17)
$âˆ’\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right){a}_{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{q}_{1}$
(2.18)

and

$âˆ’\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right){a}_{3}+\frac{\left(3+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}{2}{a}_{2}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({q}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{q}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{q}_{1}^{2}.$
(2.19)

From (2.16) and (2.18), we get

${p}_{1}=âˆ’{q}_{1}$
(2.20)

and

$8{\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}^{2}{a}_{2}^{2}={B}_{1}^{2}\left({p}_{1}^{2}+{q}_{1}^{2}\right).$
(2.21)

Also, from (2.17) and (2.19), we obtain

$\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right){a}_{2}^{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}+{q}_{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}\left({B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}\right)\left({p}_{1}^{2}+{q}_{1}^{2}\right),$

or

${a}_{2}^{2}=\frac{2{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}+{q}_{2}\right)+\left({B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}\right)\left({p}_{1}^{2}+{q}_{1}^{2}\right)}{4\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}.$
(2.22)

Since $|{p}_{i}|â‰¤2$ and $|{q}_{i}|â‰¤2$ ($i=1,2$), it follows from (2.21) and (2.22) that

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}}{\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}}$
(2.23)

and

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\sqrt{\frac{2\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}},$
(2.24)

which yields the desired estimate on $|{a}_{2}|$ as asserted in (2.5).

Next, in order to find the bound on $|{a}_{3}|$, by subtracting (2.19) from (2.17), we get

$2\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left({a}_{3}âˆ’{a}_{2}^{2}\right)=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}âˆ’{q}_{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}\left({B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}\right)\left({p}_{1}^{2}âˆ’{q}_{1}^{2}\right).$
(2.25)

Using (2.20) and (2.21) in (2.25), we have

${a}_{3}=\frac{1}{4\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}âˆ’{q}_{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4{\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}^{2}}{B}_{1}^{2}{p}_{1}^{2},$

which evidently yields

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}}{2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}}+\frac{{B}_{1}^{2}}{{\left(\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}^{2}}.$
(2.26)

On the other hand, by using (2.20) and (2.22) in (2.25), we obtain

${a}_{3}=\frac{{B}_{1}\left[\left(\mathrm{Î¼}+3\right){p}_{2}+\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){q}_{2}\right]+\left({B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}\right)\left({p}_{1}^{2}+{q}_{1}^{2}\right)}{4\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)},$
(2.27)

and applying $|{p}_{i}|â‰¤2$ and $|{q}_{i}|â‰¤2$ ($i=1,2$) for (2.27), we get

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}}{2\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}\left[\frac{\mathrm{Î¼}+3}{1+\mathrm{Î¼}}+\frac{|1âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}|}{1+\mathrm{Î¼}}\right]+\frac{2|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}.$
(2.28)

Now, we consider the bounds on $|{a}_{3}|$ according to Î¼.

Case 1. If $0â‰¤\mathrm{Î¼}<1$, then from (2.28)

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{2\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}.$
(2.29)

Case 2. If $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1$, then from (2.28)

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}}{2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}}+\frac{2|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{\left(1+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)\left(2\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)}.$
(2.30)

Thus, from (2.26), (2.29) and (2.30), we obtain the desired estimate on $|{a}_{3}|$ given in (2.6). This completes the proof of Theorem 2.1.â€ƒâ–¡

Putting $\mathrm{Î¼}=1$ and $\mathrm{Î»}=\mathrm{Î¼}=1$ in Theorem 2.1, we respectively get the following Corollaries 2.1 and 2.2.

Corollary 2.1 If $fâˆˆ{H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥1$), then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{\mathrm{Î»}+1},\sqrt{\frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{2\mathrm{Î»}+1}}\right\}$

and

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\left\{\begin{array}{cc}min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{2\mathrm{Î»}+1}+\frac{{B}_{1}^{2}}{{\left(\mathrm{Î»}+1\right)}^{2}},\frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{2\mathrm{Î»}+1}\right\},\hfill & 0â‰¤\mathrm{Î¼}<1,\hfill \\ \frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{2\mathrm{Î»}+1},\hfill & \mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1.\hfill \end{array}$

Corollary 2.2 If $fâˆˆ{H}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{2},\sqrt{\frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{3}}\right\}$

and

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\left\{\begin{array}{cc}min\left\{\frac{{B}_{1}}{3}+\frac{{B}_{1}^{2}}{4},\frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{3}\right\},\hfill & 0â‰¤\mathrm{Î¼}<1,\hfill \\ \frac{{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|}{3},\hfill & \mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥1.\hfill \end{array}$

Remark 2.1 The estimates of the coefficients $|{a}_{2}|$ and $|{a}_{3}|$ of Corollaries 2.1 and 2.2 are the improvement of the estimates obtained in [[14], Theorem 2.1] and [[13], Theorem 2.1], respectively.

Remark 2.2 If we set

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)=\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}=1+2\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î²}\right)z+2\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î²}\right){z}^{2}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1\right)$

in Corollaries 2.1 and 2.2, the results obtained improve the results in [[11], Theorem 3.2, inequalities (3.3) and (3.4)] and [[10], Theorem 2, inequality (3.3)], respectively.

Definition 2.2 Let $\mathrm{Î³}âˆˆ{C}^{âˆ—}=Câˆ–\left\{0\right\}$, $\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥0$ and $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$. A function $fâˆˆ\mathrm{Ïƒ}$ given by (1.1) is said to be in the class ${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, if the following subordinations hold:

$1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{3}{f}^{â€´}\left(z\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)f\left(z\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)}âˆ’1\right)â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)$

and

$1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{3}{g}^{â€´}\left(w\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)g\left(w\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)}âˆ’1\right)â‰º\mathrm{Ï†}\left(w\right),$

where the function g is defined by (2.4).

We note that, by choosing appropriate values for Î», Î¼, Î³ and Ï†, the class ${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ reduces to several earlier known classes.

1. (1)

${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},0,\mathrm{Ï†}\right)={N}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ},\mathrm{Î³}}^{\mathrm{Î»}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$ ($\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥0$, $\mathrm{Î³}âˆˆ{C}^{âˆ—}$) (see Kumar et al. [[14], Definition 2.2]);

2. (2)

${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(0,0,\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}\right)={S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î²}\right)$ ($0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1$) (see Brannan and Taha [[6], Definition 3.1]);

3. (3)

${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(1,0,\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}\right)={K}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Î²}\right)$ ($0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1$) (see Brannan and Taha [[6], Definition 4.1]);

4. (4)

${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(0,0,{\left(\frac{1+z}{1âˆ’z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î±}}\right)={S}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{âˆ—}\left(\mathrm{Î±}\right)$ ($0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1$) (see Taha [7]).

For functions in the class ${M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, the following estimates are derived.

Theorem 2.2 Let $\mathrm{Î³}âˆˆ{C}^{âˆ—}$, $\mathrm{Î»}â‰¥0$ and $\mathrm{Î¼}â‰¥0$. If $fâˆˆ{M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\frac{|\mathrm{Î³}|{B}_{1}\sqrt{{B}_{1}}}{\sqrt{|\left[2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right]{B}_{1}^{2}\mathrm{Î³}+2{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\left({B}_{1}âˆ’{B}_{2}\right)|}}$
(2.31)

and

$|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{|\mathrm{Î³}|\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{|2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}|}.$
(2.32)

Proof If $fâˆˆ{M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\mathrm{Î»},\mathrm{Î¼},\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then there are analytic functions $u,v:Dâ†’D$, with $u\left(0\right)=v\left(0\right)=0$, satisfying

$1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{3}{f}^{â€´}\left(z\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)f\left(z\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)}âˆ’1\right)=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(u\left(z\right)\right)$
(2.33)

and

$1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{3}{g}^{â€´}\left(w\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)g\left(w\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)}âˆ’1\right)=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(v\left(w\right)\right).$
(2.34)

Let p and q be defined as in (2.8), then it is clear from (2.33), (2.34), (2.9) and (2.10) that

$\begin{array}{r}1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{3}{f}^{â€´}\left(z\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)f\left(z\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)z{f}^{â€²}\left(z\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{z}^{2}{f}^{â€³}\left(z\right)}âˆ’1\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{p\left(z\right)âˆ’1}{p\left(z\right)+1}\right)\end{array}$
(2.35)

and

$\begin{array}{r}1+\frac{1}{\mathrm{Î³}}\left(\frac{w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right){w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{3}{g}^{â€´}\left(w\right)}{\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î»}+\mathrm{Î¼}\right)g\left(w\right)+\left(\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}\right)w{g}^{â€²}\left(w\right)+\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}{w}^{2}{g}^{â€³}\left(w\right)}âˆ’1\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{Ï†}\left(\frac{q\left(w\right)âˆ’1}{q\left(w\right)+1}\right).\end{array}$
(2.36)

It follows from (2.35), (2.36), (2.14) and (2.15) that

$\begin{array}{r}\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right){a}_{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{p}_{1}\mathrm{Î³},\end{array}$
(2.37)
$\begin{array}{r}âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}{a}_{2}^{2}+2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right){a}_{3}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{Î³}\left[\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({p}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{p}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{p}_{1}^{2}\right],\end{array}$
(2.38)
$\begin{array}{r}âˆ’\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right){a}_{2}=\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}{q}_{1}\mathrm{Î³}\end{array}$
(2.39)

and

$\begin{array}{r}\left[4\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right]{a}_{2}^{2}âˆ’2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right){a}_{3}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\mathrm{Î³}\left[\frac{1}{2}{B}_{1}\left({q}_{2}âˆ’\frac{1}{2}{q}_{1}^{2}\right)+\frac{1}{4}{B}_{2}{q}_{1}^{2}\right].\end{array}$
(2.40)

Equations (2.37) and (2.39) yield

${p}_{1}=âˆ’{q}_{1}$
(2.41)

and

$8{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}{a}_{2}^{2}={B}_{1}^{2}{\mathrm{Î³}}^{2}\left({p}_{1}^{2}+{q}_{1}^{2}\right).$
(2.42)

From (2.38), (2.40), (2.41) and (2.42), it follows that

${a}_{2}^{2}=\frac{{\mathrm{Î³}}^{2}{B}_{1}^{3}\left({p}_{2}+{q}_{2}\right)}{4\left[\left(2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right){B}_{1}^{2}\mathrm{Î³}+{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\left({B}_{1}âˆ’{B}_{2}\right)\right]}$

which yields the desired estimate on $|{a}_{2}|$ as described in (2.31).

Similarly, it can be obtained from (2.38), (2.40) and (2.41) that

$\begin{array}{rcl}{a}_{3}& =& \frac{\mathrm{Î³}{B}_{1}\left[{p}_{2}\left(4\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right)+{q}_{2}{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right]}{8\left[2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right]\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}\\ +\frac{2\mathrm{Î³}\left({B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}\right)\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right){p}_{1}^{2}}{8\left[2\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)âˆ’{\left(2\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}^{2}\right]\left(6\mathrm{Î»}\mathrm{Î¼}+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’2\mathrm{Î¼}+1\right)}\end{array}$

which easily leads to the desired estimate (2.32) on $|{a}_{3}|$.â€ƒâ–¡

Taking $\mathrm{Î¼}=0$ in Theorem 2.2, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 2.3 [[14], Theorem 2.3]

If $fâˆˆ{N}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ},\mathrm{Î³}}^{\mathrm{Î»}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\frac{|\mathrm{Î³}|{B}_{1}\sqrt{{B}_{1}}}{\sqrt{|\left(1+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’{\mathrm{Î»}}^{2}\right){B}_{1}^{2}\mathrm{Î³}+{\left(1+\mathrm{Î»}\right)}^{2}\left({B}_{1}âˆ’{B}_{2}\right)|}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{and}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{|\mathrm{Î³}|\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right)}{|1+2\mathrm{Î»}âˆ’{\mathrm{Î»}}^{2}|}.$

Further, for $\mathrm{Î³}=1$, putting $\mathrm{Î»}=0$ and $\mathrm{Î»}=1$ in Corollary 2.3, respectively, we have the following Corollaries 2.4 and 2.5.

Corollary 2.4 [[13], Corollary 2.1]

If $fâˆˆ{M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(0,0,\mathrm{Ï†}\right)=S{T}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}\sqrt{{B}_{1}}}{\sqrt{|{B}_{1}^{2}+{B}_{1}âˆ’{B}_{2}|}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{and}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}|{a}_{3}|â‰¤{B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|.$

Corollary 2.5 [[13], Corollary 2.2]

If $fâˆˆ{M}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}^{1}\left(1,0,\mathrm{Ï†}\right)=C{V}_{\mathrm{Ïƒ}}\left(\mathrm{Ï†}\right)$, then

$|{a}_{2}|â‰¤\frac{{B}_{1}\sqrt{{B}_{1}}}{\sqrt{2|{B}_{1}^{2}+2{B}_{1}âˆ’2{B}_{2}|}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathit{\text{and}}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}|{a}_{3}|â‰¤\frac{1}{2}\left({B}_{1}+|{B}_{2}âˆ’{B}_{1}|\right).$

Remark 2.3 If we set

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)={\left(\frac{1+z}{1âˆ’z}\right)}^{\mathrm{Î±}}=1+2\mathrm{Î±}z+2{\mathrm{Î±}}^{2}{z}^{2}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(0<\mathrm{Î±}â‰¤1\right)$

and

$\mathrm{Ï†}\left(z\right)=\frac{1+\left(1âˆ’2\mathrm{Î²}\right)z}{1âˆ’z}=1+2\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î²}\right)z+2\left(1âˆ’\mathrm{Î²}\right){z}^{2}+â‹¯\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\left(0â‰¤\mathrm{Î²}<1\right)$

in Corollaries 2.4 and 2.5, we obtain the results of Brannan and Taha [[6], Theorems 2.1, 3.1 and 4.1, respectively].

## References

1. Duren PL Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 259. In Univalent Functions. Springer, Berlin; 1983.

2. Srivastava HM, Owa S (Eds): Current Topics in Analytic Function Theory. World Scientific, Singapore; 1992.

3. Lewin M: On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 18: 63â€“68. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1967-0206255-1

4. Brannan, DA, Clunie, JG (eds.): Aspects of contemporary complex analysis. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held at the University of Durham, Durham, July 1â€“20, 1979. Academic Press, London (1980)

5. Netanyahu E:The minimal distance of the image boundary from the origin and the second coefficient of a univalent function in $|z|<1$. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 1969, 32: 100â€“112.

6. Brannan DA, Taha TS: On some classes of bi-univalent functions. KFAS Proceedings Series 3. In Mathematical Analysis and Its Applications. Edited by: Mazhar SM, Hamoui A, Faour NS. Pergamon, Oxford; 1988:53â€“60. see also Stud. Univ. BabeÅŸ-Bolyai, Math. 31(2), 70â€“77 (1986), Kuwait, February 18-21, 1985

7. Taha, TS: Topics in Univalent Function Theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of London (1981)

8. Brannan DA, Clunie J, Kirwan WE: Coefficient estimates for a class of star-like functions. Can. J. Math. 1970, 22: 476â€“485. 10.4153/CJM-1970-055-8

9. Ma WC, Minda D: A unified treatment of some special classes of univalent functions. Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Anal. I. In Proceedings of the Conference on Complex Analysis. International Press, Cambridge; 1994:157â€“169. Tianjin, 1992

10. Srivastava HM, Mishra AK, Gochhayat P: Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 1188â€“1192. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.05.009

11. Frasin BA, Aouf MK: New subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1569â€“1573. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.03.048

12. Caglar, M, Orhan, H, Yagmur, N: Coefficient bounds for new subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Filomat (2013, in press)

13. Ali RM, Lee SK, Ravichandran V, Supramaniam S: Coefficient estimates for bi-univalent Ma-Minda starlike and convex functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 344â€“351. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.012

14. Kumar, SS, Kumar, V, Ravichandran, V: Estimates for the initial coefficients of bi-univalent functions. Preprint

15. Srivastava HM, Bulut S, Ã‡aÄŸlar M, YaÄŸmur N: Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Filomat 2013, 27: 831â€“842.

16. Xu Q-H, Xiao H-G, Srivastava HM: A certain general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions and associated coefficient estimate problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218: 11461â€“11465. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.05.034

17. Xu Q-H, Gui Y-C, Srivastava HM: Coefficient estimates for a certain subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 990â€“994. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.11.013

## Acknowledgements

The present investigation was partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Peopleâ€™s Republic of China under Grant 11271045, the Higher School Doctoral Foundation of Peopleâ€™s Republic of China under Grant 20100003110004 and the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia of Peopleâ€™s Republic of China under Grant 2010MS0117. The authors are thankful to the referees for their careful reading and making some helpful comments which have essentially improved the presentation of this paper.

## Author information

Authors

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huo Tang.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authorsâ€™ contributions

All authors jointly worked on the results and they read and approved the final manuscript.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Tang, H., Deng, GT. & Li, SH. Coefficient estimates for new subclasses of Ma-Minda bi-univalent functions. J Inequal Appl 2013, 317 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-317