Skip to main content

Advertisement

On a new application of almost increasing sequences

Article metrics

  • 1814 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

Abstract

In (Bor in Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 17:479-482, 1994), Bor has proved the main theorem dealing with | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors of an infinite series. In the present paper, we have generalized this theorem on the φ | A , p n | k summability factors under weaker conditions by using an almost increasing sequence instead of a positive non-decreasing sequence.

MSC:40D15, 40F05, 40G99.

1 Introduction

Let a n be a given infinite series with the partial sums ( s n ). We denote by t n the n th (C,1) mean of the sequence ( s n ). The series a n is said to be summable | C , 1 | k , k1, if (see [1])

n = 1 n k 1 | t n t n 1 | k <.
(1)

Let ( p n ) be a sequence of positive numbers such that

P n = v = 0 n p v as n( P i = p i =0,i1).
(2)

The sequence-to-sequence transformation

σ n = 1 P n v = 0 n p v s v
(3)

defines the sequence ( σ n ) of the ( N ¯ , p n ) mean of the sequence ( s n ), generated by the sequence of coefficients ( p n ) (see [2]). The series a n is said to be summable | N ¯ , p n | k , k1, if (see [3])

n = 1 ( P n p n ) k 1 | σ n σ n 1 | k <.
(4)

Let A=( a n v ) be a normal matrix, i.e., a lower triangular matrix of nonzero diagonal entries. Then A defines the sequence-to-sequence transformation, mapping the sequence s=( s n ) to As=( A n (s)), where

A n (s)= v = 0 n a n v s v ,n=0,1,.
(5)

The series a n is said to be summable |A, p n | k , k1, if (see [4])

n = 1 ( P n p n ) k 1 | Δ ¯ A n ( s ) | k <,
(6)

where

Δ ¯ A n (s)= A n (s) A n 1 (s).

Let ( φ n ) be any sequence of positive real numbers. The series a n is said to be summable φ|A, p n | k , k1, if (see [5])

n = 1 φ n k 1 | Δ ¯ A n (s) | k <.
(7)

If we take φ n = P n p n , then φ|A, p n | k summability reduces to | A , p n | k summability. Also, if we take φ n = P n p n and a n v = p v P n , then we get | N ¯ , p n | k summability. Furthermore, if we take φ n =n, a n v = p v P n and p n =1 for all values of n, φ|A, p n | k reduces to | C , 1 | k summability. Finally, if we take φ n =n and a n v = p v P n , then we get | R , p n | k summability (see [6]).

Before stating the main theorem, we must first introduce some further notations.

Given a normal matrix A=( a n v ), we associate two lower semimatrices A ¯ =( a ¯ n v ) and A ˆ =( a ˆ n v ) as follows:

a ¯ n v = i = v n a n i ,n,v=0,1,
(8)

and

a ˆ 00 = a ¯ 00 = a 00 , a ˆ n v = a ¯ n v a ¯ n 1 , v ,n=1,2,.
(9)

It may be noted that A ¯ and A ˆ are the well-known matrices of series-to-sequence and series-to-series transformations, respectively. Then we have

A n (s)= v = 0 n a n v s v = v = 0 n a ¯ n v a v
(10)

and

Δ ¯ A n (s)= v = 0 n a ˆ n v a v .
(11)

2 Known result

Many works have been done dealing with | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors of infinite series (see [722]). Among them, in [21], the following main theorem has been proved.

Theorem A Let ( X n ) be a positive non-decreasing sequence and let there be sequences ( β n ) and ( λ n ) such that

(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

are satisfied. Furthermore, if ( p n ) is a sequence of positive numbers such that

(16)
(17)

then the series a n λ n is summable | N ¯ , p n | k , k1.

3 The main result

The aim of this paper is to generalize Theorem A for φ | A , p n | k summability under weaker conditions. For this, we need the concept of an almost increasing sequence. A positive sequence ( c n ) is said to be almost increasing if there exists a positive increasing sequence ( b n ) and two positive constants A and B such that A b n c n B b n (see [23]). Obviously, every increasing sequence is an almost increasing sequence but the converse need not be true as can be seen from the example b n =n e ( 1 ) n . Also, one can find some results dealing with absolute almost convergent sequences (see [24]). So, we are weakening the hypotheses of Theorem A replacing the increasing sequence by an almost increasing sequence. Now, we shall prove the following theorem.

Theorem Let A=( a n v ) be a positive normal matrix such that

(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)

Let ( X n ) be an almost increasing sequence and ( φ n p n P n ) be a non-increasing sequence. If conditions (12)-(16) and

n = 1 m φ n k 1 ( p n P n ) k | s n | k =O( X m ) as m,
(22)

are satisfied, then the series a n λ n is summable φ | A , p n | k , k1.

Remark It should be noted that if we take ( X n ) as a positive non-decreasing sequence, φ n = P n p n and a n v = p v P n , then we get Theorem A. In this case, conditions (21) and (22) reduce to conditions (16) and (17), respectively. Also, the condition ‘( φ n p n P n ) is a non-increasing sequence’ and the conditions (18)-(20) are automatically satisfied.

Lemma [22]

Under the conditions on ( X n ), ( β n ) and ( λ n ) as taken in the statement of the theorem, we have the following:

(23)
(24)

Proof of the Theorem Let ( T n ) denote A-transform of the series a n λ n . Then we have, by (10) and (11),

Δ ¯ T n = v = 1 n a ˆ n v λ v a v .

Applying Abel’s transformation to this sum, we get that

Δ ¯ T n = v = 1 n 1 Δ v ( a ˆ n v λ v ) s v + a ˆ n n λ n s n = v = 1 n 1 ( a ˆ n v λ v a ˆ n , v + 1 λ v + 1 ) s v + a ˆ n n λ n s n = v = 1 n 1 Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) λ v s v + v = 1 n 1 a ˆ n , v + 1 s v Δ λ v + a n n λ n s n = T n ( 1 ) + T n ( 2 ) + T n ( 3 ) .

To complete the proof of the theorem, by Minkowski’s inequality, it is sufficient to show that

n = 1 φ n k 1 | T n (r) | k <for r=1,2,3.

Now, when k>1, applying Hölder’s inequality with indices k and k ´ , where 1/k+1/ k ´ =1, we have that

n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 | T n ( 1 ) | k = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | | λ v | | s v | ) k = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | | λ v | k | s v | k ) × ( v = 1 n 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | ) k 1 = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 ( φ n p n P n ) k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | | λ v | k | s v | k ) = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m | λ v | k | s v | k n = v + 1 m + 1 ( φ n p n P n ) k 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m | λ v | k | s v | k ( φ v p v P v ) k 1 n = v + 1 m + 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m | λ v | k 1 | λ v | | s v | k ( φ v p v P v ) k 1 ( p v P v ) = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m | λ v | φ v k 1 ( p v P v ) k | s v | k = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 Δ | λ v | r = 1 v φ r k 1 ( p r P r ) k | s r | k + O ( 1 ) | λ m | v = 1 m φ v k 1 ( p v P v ) k | s v | k = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 | Δ λ v | X v + O ( 1 ) | λ m | X m = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 β v X v + O ( 1 ) | λ m | X m = O ( 1 ) as  m ,

by virtue of the hypotheses of the theorem and the lemma. Again, applying Hölder’s inequality and using the fact that v β v =O( 1 X v )=O(1) by (23), we get that

n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 | T n ( 2 ) | k = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | a ˆ n , v + 1 | | Δ λ v | | s v | ) k = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | a ˆ n , v + 1 | β v | s v | k ) × ( v = 1 n 1 | a ˆ n , v + 1 | β v ) k 1 = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 φ n k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 | a ˆ n , v + 1 | β v | s v | k ) × ( v = 1 n 1 v | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | β v ) k 1 = O ( 1 ) n = 2 m + 1 ( φ n p n P n ) k 1 ( v = 1 n 1 v | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | β v | s v | k ) = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m v β v | s v | k n = v + 1 m + 1 ( φ n p n P n ) k 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m v β v | s v | k ( φ v p v P v ) k 1 n = v + 1 m + 1 | Δ v ( a ˆ n v ) | = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m v β v | s v | k ( φ v p v P v ) k 1 ( p v P v ) = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 Δ ( v β v ) r = 1 v φ r k 1 ( p r P r ) k | s r | k + O ( 1 ) m β m v = 1 m φ v k 1 ( p v P v ) k | s v | k = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 | Δ ( v β v ) | X v + O ( 1 ) m β m X m = O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 v | Δ β v | X v + O ( 1 ) v = 1 m 1 β v + 1 X v + 1 + O ( 1 ) m β m X m = O ( 1 ) as  m ,

by virtue of the hypotheses of the theorem and the lemma. Finally, as in T n (1), we have that

n = 1 m φ n k 1 | T n ( 3 ) | k = O ( 1 ) n = 1 m φ n k 1 | a n n λ n s n | k = O ( 1 ) n = 1 m | λ n | φ n k 1 ( p n P n ) k | s n | k = O ( 1 ) as  m .

This completes the proof of the theorem. If we take φ n = P n p n , then we get a result concerning the | A , p n | k summability factors. If we take a n v = p v P n , then we have another result dealing with | N ¯ , p n , φ n | k summability. If we take a n v = p v P n and p n =1 for all values of n, then we get a result dealing with | C , 1 , φ n | k summability. If we take φ n =n, a n v = p v P n and p n =1 for all values of n, then we get a result for | C , 1 | k summability. □

References

  1. 1.

    Flett TM: On an extension of absolute summability and some theorems of Littlewood and Paley. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1957, 7: 113–141. 10.1112/plms/s3-7.1.113

  2. 2.

    Hardy GH: Divergent Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford; 1949.

  3. 3.

    Bor H: On two summability methods. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1985, 97: 147–149. 10.1017/S030500410006268X

  4. 4.

    Sulaiman WT: Inclusion theorems for absolute matrix summability methods of an infinite series (IV). Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 34(11):1547–1557.

  5. 5.

    Özarslan, HS, Keten, A: A new application of almost increasing sequences. An. ştiinţ. Univ. “Al.I. Cuza” Iaşi, Mat. (2012, in press)

  6. 6.

    Bor H: On the relative strength of two absolute summability methods. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1991, 113: 1009–1012.

  7. 7.

    Bor H:On | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1985, 94: 419–422.

  8. 8.

    Bor H:A note on | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors of infinite series. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1987, 18: 330–336.

  9. 9.

    Bor H: On absolute summability factors. Analysis 1987, 7: 185–193.

  10. 10.

    Bor H: Absolute summability factors for infinite series. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1988, 19: 664–671.

  11. 11.

    Bor H, Kuttner B: On the necessary conditions for absolute weighted arithmetic mean summability factors. Acta Math. Hung. 1989, 54: 57–61. 10.1007/BF01950709

  12. 12.

    Bor H:A note on | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 1990, 82: 357–362.

  13. 13.

    Bor H: Absolute summability factors for infinite series. Math. Jpn. 1991, 36: 215–219.

  14. 14.

    Bor H:Factors for | N ¯ , p n | k summability of infinite series. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Ser. A 1 Math. 1991, 16: 151–154.

  15. 15.

    Bor H:On absolute summability factors for | N ¯ , p n | k summability. Comment. Math. Univ. Carol. 1991, 32(3):435–439.

  16. 16.

    Bor H:On the | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors for infinite series. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 1991, 101: 143–146. 10.1007/BF02868023

  17. 17.

    Bor H:A note on | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors. Rend. Mat. Appl. (7) 1992, 12: 937–942.

  18. 18.

    Bor H: On absolute summability factors. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1993, 118: 71–75. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1993-1155594-4

  19. 19.

    Bor H: On the absolute Riesz summability factors. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1994, 24: 1263–1271. 10.1216/rmjm/1181072337

  20. 20.

    Bor H:On | N ¯ , p n | k summability factors. Kuwait J. Sci. Eng. 1996, 23: 1–5.

  21. 21.

    Bor H: A note on absolute summability factors. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1994, 17: 479–482. 10.1155/S0161171294000700

  22. 22.

    Mazhar SM: A note on absolute summability factors. Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sin. 1997, 25(3):233–242.

  23. 23.

    Bari NK, Stečkin SB: Best approximation and differential properties of two conjugate functions. Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obŝ. 1956, 5: 483–522. in Russian

  24. 24.

    Çakalli H, Çanak G:( p n ,s)-absolute almost convergent sequences. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 1997, 28(4):525–532.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A Keten.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özarslan, H., Keten, A. On a new application of almost increasing sequences. J Inequal Appl 2013, 13 (2013) doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2013-13

Download citation

Keywords

  • absolute matrix summability
  • almost increasing sequences
  • infinite series