- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On a strengthened version of Hardy’s inequality
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2012, Article number: 300 (2012)
Abstract
On the basis of analytic method and skill, a strengthened version of well-known Hardy’s inequality is obtained. In comparison with some similar results given in recent decades, it successfully reduced the related coefficient.
MSC:26D15.
1 Introduction
There are many applications with well-known Hardy’s inequality in analytics, which refers to the following: let (), , then
In recent decades, there have also been many results due to the extension and refinement of this inequality (cf. [1–5]), especially the monograph [6], which summarized part of the research done before 2005. In research on the coefficient of (1.1), the following conclusion in the case was drawn in [6]:
In [7], by using the method of weight-coefficient, the following inequality is proved with :
In the following section, let and
We shall strengthen Hardy’s inequality to
2 Relevant lemmas
Some characters of a convex function will be cited in this section.
Definition 2.1 is an interval, and is continuous. If
holds for all , then f is called a convex (concave) function.
The sufficient and necessary condition for a second-order differential function f to be convex (concave) function is that always holds for any . The famous Hadamard inequality is as follows. Let f be a convex (concave) function on , then the equality
holds if and only if f is a linear function.
Lemma 2.1 Let , and is defined in the first section, then .
Proof The proof includes two parts.
Part 1: When , if we can obtain , then we can get obviously. Since
is monotone decreasing on , then .
Meanwhile, is equivalent to
The above two inequalities obviously hold with . If , then is increasing about p, and −p are decreasing in relation to p. Then
Part 2: When , then it should be proved that and are respectively equivalent to and . Since is strictly decreasing for , then it is proved that
and
The proof of Lemma 2.1 is completed. □
Lemma 2.2
-
(i)
Let , , then
(2.2) -
(ii)
Let , then is a convex function.
Proof (i) The proposition is equivalent to
Bernoulli’s inequality refers to the following: (, ) holds if . If , , then formula (2.2) holds.
-
(ii)
According to Lemma 2.1,
so, f is a convex function. The proof of Lemma 2.2 is completed. □
Lemma 2.3 Let n be a positive natural number, .
-
(i)
If , then
(2.3) -
(ii)
If , then
(2.4)
Proof (i) If , inequality (2.3) is proved easily. Assume that when , the following equality holds for :
Because is a convex function on , then according to Hadamard’s inequality of a convex function, formula (2.3) also holds if .
-
(ii)
If , inequality (2.4) is proved easily. Assume that when , the inequality holds. For ,
By inequality (2.2) and the fact that is a convex function on , we have
Thus, the inequality (2.4) also holds if . □
Lemma 2.4 Let i be any positive natural number and , then
Proof Let and
Then
According to the conclusion of Lemma 2.2 and Hadamard’s inequality of a convex function, the sequence is a strictly decreasing sequence. It is also known that , then always holds. The proof of Lemma 2.4 is completed. □
3 A new strengthened version of Hardy’s inequality
Theorem 3.1 Let , , , , and
then
Proof Let , then . According to Holder’s inequality,
If and , then
Thus,
If , according to formula (2.3) and Bernoulli’s inequality,
If , by using formula (2.4), we obtain
Therefore, for any , the following inequality holds:
By Lemma 2.4, we get
So, from inequalities (3.2) and (3.3), the following result can be obtained:
The proof of Theorem 3.1 is completed. □
References
Wedestig A: Some new Hardy type inequalities and their limiting inequalities. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2003., 4(3): Article ID 61
Bicheng Y, Debnath L: Generalizations of Hardy integral inequalities. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 1999, 22(3):535–542. 10.1155/S0161171299225355
Beeasck PR: Hardy inequality and its extensions. Pac. J. Math. 1961, 11: 39–61. 10.2140/pjm.1961.11.39
Bicheng Y, Zhuohua Z, Debnath L: On new generalizations of Hardy integral inequalities. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 217: 321–327. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.5758
Pachpatte BG: Mathematical Inequalities. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2005:113–209.
Bicheng Y, Yunhua Z: An improvement on Hardy’s inequality. Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. Sunyatseni 1998, 37(1):41–44.
Qiling H: On an improvement of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality in an interval. Acta Sci. Natur. Univ. Sunyatseni 2000, 39(3):20–24.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of the Open University of China under Grant No. Q1601E.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
QX provided the main idea in this article and carried out the proof of the Theorem 3.1. MZ carried out the proof of Lemma 2.4. XZ carried out the proof of Lemmas 2.1-2.3. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, Q., Zhou, M. & Zhang, X. On a strengthened version of Hardy’s inequality. J Inequal Appl 2012, 300 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-300
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-300