- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On a new class of Hardy-type inequalities
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2012, Article number: 259 (2012)
Abstract
In this paper, we generalize a Hardy-type inequality to the class of arbitrary non-negative functions bounded from below and above with a convex function multiplied with positive real constants. This enables us to obtain new generalizations of the classical integral Hardy, Hardy-Hilbert, Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya, and Pólya-Knopp inequalities as well as of Godunova’s and of some recently obtained inequalities in multidimensional settings. Finally, we apply a similar idea to functions bounded from below and above with a superquadratic function.
MSC: 26D10, 26D15.
1 Introduction
Let and , be measure spaces with positive σ-finite measures. Let and be non-negative measurable functions such that
and
Recently, Krulić et al. [1] proved that the modular Hardy-type inequality
holds for all non-negative convex functions Φ defined on a convex set , all measurable functions such that , and the general integral operator defined by
Some further important and useful modular inequalities, related to (1.2) and to even more general modular functions Φ, can be found, e.g., in [2] and [3].
It is not hard to see that inequality (1.2) generalizes several well-known classical one-dimensional integral inequalities. We recall them for reader’s convenience. Namely, let , , , and let . If and is defined by , then for and for instead of , from (1.2) we get the classical Hardy integral inequality
for non-negative functions . In the same setting, except for replaced with and for , (1.2) becomes Hardy-Hilbert’s integral inequality
while for , we get Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya’s inequality
where . Similarly, by considering , , , , and instead of in (1.2), we obtain Pólya-Knopp’s inequality
Observe that (1.7) follows also from (1.4) by rewriting it with , instead of with a positive function f, and by taking limit as . Moreover, the constants , , , and e, respectively appearing on the right-hand sides of (1.4)-(1.7), are the best possible, that is, neither of them can be replaced with any smaller constant.
Inequality (1.2) can also be particularized to some multidimensional settings. Before stating the corresponding results, we need to introduce some notation. First, we set , and for and , denote
Especially, . Further, for , we write if componentwise , , and relations ≤, >, and ≥ are defined analogously. For , , we define . Moreover,
and the n-boxes , , and are defined similarly. Finally, the integral is interpreted as .
Using this notation, for , , , , the weight function , , and the kernel of the form , where is a non-negative measurable function such that , inequality (1.2) reduces to a result of Godunova [4]. She proved that the inequality
holds for all convex functions and non-negative measurable functions f on such that the function is integrable on .
On the other hand, applying a different approach, Oguntuase et al. [5] obtained a class of multidimensional strengthened Hardy-type inequalities with power weights, related to arbitrary a.e. positive convex functions bounded from below and above with a power function multiplied with positive constants. More precisely, let and be a convex function such that there exist positive real constants providing
If , , and , then the inequality
holds for all non-negative integrable functions . The same inequality holds also if , , and f is an a.e. positive function. In the same paper, the so-called dual inequality
was obtained, which holds for , , , and all non-negative integrable functions , as well as for , , and all a.e. positive integrable functions f on .
Motivated by the idea from [5], in this paper we generalize the modular Hardy-type inequality (1.2) to the class of arbitrary non-negative modular functions Φ equivalent to a non-negative convex function, that is, such that holds for some real constants and a non-negative convex function Ψ. Applying the result obtained to some particular one-dimensional settings, we get new generalizations of the classical inequalities (1.4)-(1.7). Moreover, our result provides a new generalization of Godunova’s inequality (1.8) and improves inequalities (1.10) and (1.11) by relaxing the conditions on the function Φ and by replacing the constant with the smaller constant . Finally, we show that a similar idea can be applied to the function Φ bounded with a superquadratic function Ψ in the same way. Such an approach enables us to get a new generalization of the refined Hardy-type inequality from [6].
Conventions Throughout this paper, all functions are assumed to be measurable and expressions of the form , , , and , where , are taken to be equal to zero. For a real parameter , by we denote its conjugate exponent , that is, . In addition, by a weight function (shortly: a weight), we mean a non-negative measurable function on the actual set, while an interval stands for any convex subset of ℝ. As usual, logx is the natural logarithm of , is the usual beta function, while denotes the incomplete beta function defined by
2 General Hardy-Knopp-type inequalities
Our first result is a generalization of inequality (1.2) to an arbitrary modular function such that
holds for some real constants and a non-negative convex function Ψ on I. For example, a whole class of such non-convex functions is given by , . Another interesting non-convex function Φ is given on by
It is equivalent to the power function , where , since it fulfills , .
Now, we state and prove the central theorem in this section.
Theorem 2.1 Let , and be measure spaces with positive σ-finite measures, u be a weight function on , and k be a non-negative measurable function on . Suppose that is as in (1.1), that the function is integrable on for each fixed , and that the weight function v is defined by
If Φ and Ψ are non-negative functions on an interval , such that Ψ is convex and (2.1) holds for some real constants , then the inequality
holds for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined on by (1.3).
Proof Observe that , . Applying (2.1), Jensen’s and Minkowski’s inequalities as well as monotonicity of the power function on , we get
so the proof is completed. □
Remark 2.1 Notice that the inequality
holds even if a non-negative function Φ is bounded with a convex function Ψ only from above, that is, if , for a.e. . Therefore,
where denotes the class of all convex functions Ψ on I such that for a.e. .
Remark 2.2 Rewriting (2.2) with , that is, with or , we obtain
Notice that for or (in the latter case Φ and Ψ have to be positive), the function is convex as well. Hence, by replacing Φ with and considering that
relation (2.3) becomes
Especially, for and , we get
Remark 2.3 For , inequality (2.2) reduces to (1.2), so Theorem 2.1 can be regarded as a generalization of the corresponding result from [1]. In that case, the function Φ has to be convex.
The following two sections are dedicated to some applications and analogues of Theorem 2.1. Namely, by choosing some standard measure spaces, kernels, and weight functions, we get generalizations of one-dimensional and multidimensional Hardy-Knopp-type inequalities from the papers [1, 4, 7–9], and [5].
3 Generalized one-dimensional Hardy-Knopp-type inequalities
In this section, we consider the standard one-dimensional setting with intervals in ℝ and the Lebesgue measure. First, let and
Applying Theorem 2.1 to , , , and to , , instead of k, , , we get the following corollary.
Corollary 3.1 Let and , be non-negative measurable functions such that
and let
If or , Ψ is a non-negative convex function on an interval , and fulfills (2.1) for some positive real constants , then the inequalities
hold for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined by
On the other hand, for ,
, , , and for k, , and respectively replaced with , , and , Theorem 2.1 provides the results dual to Corollary 3.1.
Corollary 3.2 For , let and be non-negative measurable functions satisfying
and
If or , Ψ is a non-negative convex function on an interval and satisfies (2.1), then the inequalities
hold for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined as
Remark 3.1 By setting in Corollary 3.1 and Corollary 3.2, we obtain a generalization of [[9], Theorem 3.1] and [[9], Theorem 4.3]. Observe that the functions Φ and Ψ need not be non-negative in that case.
As a consequence of Corollary 3.1, we get an inequality related to the so-called Riemann-Liouville operator.
Example 3.1 Let b, p, and q be as in Corollary 3.1, the set be defined by (3.1), and let and be defined by and , where . Under the conditions of Corollary 3.1, we have
where is Riemann-Liouville’s operator given by
while for , we define
As usual, denotes the incomplete beta function defined in the introduction. Rewriting the second line of (3.8) with , such that , and with and instead of b and , after a sequence of suitable variable changes, we obtain the strengthened Hardy inequality
for non-negative functions f on (positive, if ), where
and
(see [7] for more details). If the function Φ is such that (1.9) holds, then
so we obtained a new generalization of (3.10). Notice that for , , , and , , inequalities (3.11) reduce to the classical Hardy inequality (1.4).
On the other hand, rewriting the second line of (3.8) with and , as well as with instead of a positive function , we get the strengthened Pólya-Knopp inequality
obtained in [7], where
Hence, for the function satisfying for a.e. , where , we get the following generalization of (3.12):
Observe that inequality (1.7) follows from (3.13) by taking , and , .
In the sequel, we state and prove inequalities dual to (3.8)-(3.13), related to the so-called Weyl operator.
Example 3.2 Suppose and is defined by (3.5). Define the kernel and the weight function as and . For , , , a non-negative function Φ on an interval , a convex function fulfilling (2.1), and a function with values in I, from Corollary 3.2 we get the inequalities
where denotes the Weyl operator given by
and for , we define .
As in Example 3.1, to get a new dual Hardy inequality, we rewrite (3.14) with . More precisely, let be such that ,
f be a non-negative function on (positive, if ), and
Substituting and respectively for b and in the inequality from the second line of (3.14), after some computations and using the condition (1.9), as in [7], we obtain the inequalities
For , , , and , relation (3.16) reduces to the so-called classical dual Hardy inequality.
Finally, for , , and instead of a positive function , inequality (3.14) becomes
where
Since for , , and , , relation (3.17) reduces to the so-called classical dual Pólya-Knopp inequality, our result can be regarded as its generalization.
Remark 3.2 It is important to notice that due to variable changes applied, none of the inequalities from Example 3.1 and Example 3.2 can be derived directly from Theorem 2.1.
Our analysis continues by considering . We still assume that and . In the following example, we apply Theorem 2.1 to provide a new generalization of the classical Hardy-Hilbert inequality (1.5).
Example 3.3 Let be such that and , and let . Let and be respectively defined by and . Applying Theorem 2.1 with and with instead of , as in [7], we get the inequalities
where
and Sf denotes the generalized Stieltjes transform of a non-negative function f on ,
(see [10] and [11] for further information). In particular, for , , and , we have , so (3.18) provides a new generalization of the classical Hardy-Hilbert inequality (1.5).
Similarly, in the next example we generalize the classical Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya inequality (1.6).
Example 3.4 Let the parameters p, q, s, α and the functions u and f be as in Example 3.3, and let be defined by . For a non-negative function Φ such that (1.9) holds, and for instead of , from Theorem 2.1 we get
where
and
(see [7] for more details). For , , and , we have , so it is not hard to see that our result generalizes the classical Hardy-Littlewood-Pólya inequality (1.6).
We complete this section with another Hardy-Hilbert-type inequality, making use of the well-known reflection formula for the Digamma function ψ,
and of the fact that
More precisely, , where is the so-called unified Riemann-Zeta function,
where , and either , and or and (for more information regarding the unified Riemann-Zeta function, see, e.g., [12]).
Example 3.5 Suppose that and are such that and . Define the kernel by and the weight function by . As in previous two examples, applying Theorem 2.1 to and to instead of , we get
where
and
Observe that for relation (3.20) reduces to a usual Hardy-Hilbert-type inequality, so our result can be seen as a generalization in that direction.
4 Generalized multidimensional Hardy-Knopp-type inequalities
In this section, we give a multidimensional result related to Godunova’s inequality (1.8). Namely, we improve and generalize inequalities (1.10) and (1.11) by considering an arbitrary function Φ, not necessarily convex, such that (2.1) holds.
Suppose that , , , and that the kernel is of the form , where is a non-negative measurable function. Applying Theorem 2.1 to this setting and to and , respectively replaced with and , we get the following generalization of Godunova’s inequality (1.8) and a generalization of [[7], Theorem 6.1].
Theorem 4.1 Let or . Let l and u be non-negative measurable functions on such that for all , and that the function is integrable on for each fixed . Let the function w be defined on by
If Ψ is a non-negative convex function on an interval and is any function satisfying (2.1) for some real constants , then the inequality
holds for all measurable functions with values in I and defined by
The above result can be reformulated with particular convex functions, for example, with power and exponential functions. This leads to multidimensional analogues of corollaries and examples from the previous section. Due to the lack of space, we only give a result regarding the n-dimensional Riemann-Liouville operator. The corresponding result for the n-dimensional Weyl operator, which provides a generalization and a refinement of (1.11), can be obtained by a similar method as in the one-dimensional case.
Following the idea that we have used to get inequality (3.11), we obtain the next result.
Example 4.1 Let be such that . Let and
Specifying Theorem 4.1 for , , and , , we get and the inequalities
where
and
Considering the inequality from the second line of (4.3) with , such that , and with and , respectively instead of b and , after a sequence of suitable variable changes, we obtain the inequality
where
and
Moreover, if the function Φ is such that (1.9) holds, then we get a new generalization of the strengthened Hardy inequality (4.5),
Notice that (4.7) generalizes and refines inequality (1.10). Namely, for and , inequality (4.7) reduces to (1.10), only with a smaller constant on its right-hand side (since ).
5 General Hardy-type inequalities for superquadratic functions
To conclude the paper, we state and prove a weighted Hardy-type inequality involving general measure spaces, a non-negative kernel, and a function bounded with a superquadratic function. For reader’s convenience, we recall the notion and some basic properties of superquadratic functions (for more information, see [13–15]). A function is called superquadratic provided that for each there exists a constant such that
for all . It is known that a continuously differentiable function , such that , is superquadratic if the function is non-decreasing on or the function is superadditive, that is, , (see [[14], Lemma 3.1]). As a consequence, the power function , , is superquadratic for all , . On the other hand, another important characterization of a superquadratic function is the refined Jensen inequality
It holds for all probability measure spaces and all non-negative μ-integrable functions f on Ω if and only if is a superquadratic function (see [[14], Theorem 2.3]).
The following theorem provides the main result of this section.
Theorem 5.1 Suppose that , , u, k, and K are as in Theorem 2.1, that the function is integrable on for each fixed , and that the positive function v is defined by
If Ψ is a superquadratic function on an interval and is any function fulfilling (2.1) for some constants , then
holds for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined on by (1.3).
Proof Applying inequality (5.1) to a superquadratic function Ψ, for each fixed , we get
Therefrom,
so (5.2) is proved. □
As in previous sections, the above result can be specified for some usual measure spaces. Namely, suppose , , , and is defined by (4.2). Applying Theorem 5.1 to this setting and to , , and respectively replaced with , , and , we immediately obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 5.1 Let , and let and be non-negative measurable functions such that
and
If a real-valued function Ψ is superquadratic on an interval and satisfies (2.1), then
holds for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined as
Remark 5.1 Observe that for , , and a superquadratic function Φ (that is, for ), inequality (5.3) reduces to [[6], Proposition 2.1], so our result can be regarded as its generalization.
Analogously, applying Theorem 5.1 to , , and respectively replaced with , , and , where and , we get the following result dual to Corollary 5.1.
Corollary 5.2 Let , and let and be non-negative measurable functions such that
and
If Ψ is a superquadratic function on an interval and satisfies (2.1), then
holds for all measurable functions with values in I and for defined by
Remark 5.2 For , , and a superquadratic function Φ (that is, for ), relation (5.4) reduces to [[6], Proposition 2.2]. Hence, our results can be seen as its generalization.
Finally, we apply Corollary 5.1 to the superquadratic function , , where , and to some particular weights and kernels deducing a new class of multidimensional Hardy-type inequalities.
Example 5.1 Let , , and let . Rewriting Corollary 5.1 with , , , and , where is defined by (4.2), we get
As in Example 4.1, the operator is given by (4.4), while
Considering the second inequality in (5.5) with such that and with and instead of b and respectively, after a sequence of variable changes as in Example 4.1, we deduce the inequality
where is defined by (4.6). Combining (5.5) and (5.6), we obtain
Notice that our inequalities (5.6) and (5.7) generalize the results from [6] since inequality (5.6) reduces to [[6], Theorem 3.1] for .
A result dual to (5.7) generalizes the corresponding inequality from [[6], Theorem 3.2]. It is omitted since it can be deduced similarly, starting from Corollary 5.2.
References
Krulić K, Pečarić J, Persson LE: Some new Hardy type inequalities with general kernels. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2009, 12: 473–485.
Lai Q: Weighted modular inequalities for Hardy type operators. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1999, 79(3):649–672. 10.1112/S0024611599012010
Levinson N: Generalizations of an inequality of Hardy. Duke Math. J. 1964, 31: 389–394. 10.1215/S0012-7094-64-03137-0
Godunova EK: Generalization of a two-parameter Hilbert inequality. Izv. Vysš. Učebn. Zaved., Mat. 1967, 54(1):35–39. (Russian)
Oguntuase JA, Persson LE, Čižmešija A: Multidimensional Hardy-type inequalities via convexity. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2008, 77: 245–260.
Oguntuase JA, Persson LE: Refinement of Hardy’s inequalities via superquadratic and subquadratic functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 339: 1305–1312. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.08.007
Čižmešija, A, Krulić, K, Pečarić, J: A new class of general refined Hardy-type inequalities with kernels. Rad Hrvat. Akad. Znan. Umjet. Mat. Znan. (2013, in press)
Čižmešija A, Pečarić J, Persson LE: On strengthened Hardy and Pólya-Knopp’s inequalities. J. Approx. Theory 2003, 125: 74–84. 10.1016/j.jat.2003.09.007
Kaijser S, Nikolova L, Persson LE, Wedestig A: Hardy type inequalities via convexity. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2005, 8(3):403–417.
Andersen KF: Weighted inequalities for the Stieltjes transformation and Hilbert’s double series. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. A 1980, 86(1–2):75–84. 10.1017/S0308210500012014
Shum DT: On integral inequalities related to Hardy’s. Can. Math. Bull. 1971, 14(2):225–230.
Goyal SP, Parashar A: Some results for unified Riemann-zeta function. Kyungpook Math. J. 2002, 42(1):87–94.
Abramovich S, Banić S, Matić M: Superquadratic functions in several variables. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 137(2):1444–1460.
Abramovich S, Jameson G, Sinnamon G: Refining of Jensen’s inequality. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum. 2004, 47(95):3–14.
Abramovich S, Jameson G, Sinnamon G: Inequalities for averages of convex and superquadratic functions. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2004., 7(2): Article ID 70
Acknowledgements
The third author expresses his gratitude to the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical physics, Trieste, Italy, for financial support to carry out this work within the framework of the associate scheme of the Centre. The research of the second and fifth authors was supported by the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports, under the Research Grants 058-1170889-1050 (second author) and 082-0000000-0893 (fifth author). All authors express their gratitude to the careful referee whose advices improved the final version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to the research and the way its results are presented in this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Adeleke, E., Čižmešija, A., Oguntuase, J. et al. On a new class of Hardy-type inequalities. J Inequal Appl 2012, 259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-259
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-259