- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:
On the Strong Laws for Weighted Sums of
-Mixing Random Variables
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2011, Article number: 157816 (2011)
Abstract
Complete convergence is studied for linear statistics that are weighted sums of identically distributed -mixing random variables under a suitable moment condition. The results obtained generalize and complement some earlier results. A Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund-type strong law is also obtained.
1. Introduction
Suppose that is a sequence of random variables and
is a subset of the natural number set
. Let
,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ1_HTML.gif)
where
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ2_HTML.gif)
Definition 1.1.
A random variable sequence is said to be a
-mixing random variable sequence if there exists
such that
.
The notion of -mixing seems to be similar to the notion of
-mixing, but they are quite different from each other. Many useful results have been obtained for
-mixing random variables. For example, Bradley [1] has established the central limit theorem, Byrc and Smoleński [2] and Yang [3] have obtained moment inequalities and the strong law of large numbers, Wu [4, 5], Peligrad and Gut [6], and Gan [7] have studied almost sure convergence, Utev and Peligrad [8] have established maximal inequalities and the invariance principle, An and Yuan [9] have considered the complete convergence and Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund-type strong law of large numbers, and Budsaba et al. [10] have proved the rate of convergence and strong law of large numbers for partial sums of moving average processes based on
-mixing random variables under some moment conditions.
For a sequence of
. random variables, Baum and Katz [11] proved the following well-known complete convergence theorem: suppose that
is a sequence of
. random variables. Then
and
if and only if
for all
.
Hsu and Robbins [12] and Erdös [13] proved the case and
of the above theorem. The case
and
of the above theorem was proved by Spitzer [14]. An and Yuan [9] studied the weighted sums of identically distributed
-mixing sequence and have the following results.
Theorem B.
Let be a
-mixing sequence of identically distributed random variables,
,
, and suppose that
for
. Assume that
is an array of real numbers satisfying
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ4_HTML.gif)
If , then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ5_HTML.gif)
Theorem C.
Let be a
-mixing sequence of identically distributed random variables,
,
, and
for
. Assume that
is array of real numbers satisfying (1.3). Then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ6_HTML.gif)
Recently, Sung [15] obtained the following complete convergence results for weighted sums of identically distributed NA random variables.
Theorem D.
Let be a sequence of identically distributed NA random variables, and let
be an array of constants satisfying
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ7_HTML.gif)
for some . Let
for some
. Furthermore, suppose that
where
. If
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ8_HTML.gif)
then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ9_HTML.gif)
We find that the proof of Theorem C is mistakenly based on the fact that (1.5) holds for . Hence, the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund-type strong laws for
-mixing sequence have not been established.
In this paper, we shall not only partially generalize Theorem D to -mixing case, but also extend Theorem B to the case
. The main purpose is to establish the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund strong laws for linear statistics of
-mixing random variables under some suitable conditions.
We have the following results.
Theorem 1.2.
Let be a sequence of identically distributed
-mixing random variables, and let
be an array of constants satisfying
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ10_HTML.gif)
where for some
and
. Let
. If
for
and (1.8) for
, then (1.9) holds.
Remark 1.3.
The proof of Theorem D was based on Theorem 1 of Chen et al. [16], which gave sufficient conditions about complete convergence for NA random variables. So far, it is not known whether the result of Chen et al. [16] holds for -mixing sequence. Hence, we use different methods from those of Sung [15]. We only extend the case
of Theorem D to
-mixing random variables. It is still open question whether the result of Theorem D about the case
holds for
-mixing sequence.
Theorem 1.4.
Under the conditions of Theorem 1.2, the assumptions for
and (1.8) for
imply the following Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund strong law:
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ11_HTML.gif)
2. Proof of the Main Result
Throughout this paper, the symbol represents a positive constant though its value may change from one appearance to next. It proves convenient to define
, where
denotes the natural logarithm.
To obtain our results, the following lemmas are needed.
Lemma 2.1 (Utev and Peligrad [8]).
Suppose is a positive integer,
, and
. Then there exists a positive constant
such that the following statement holds.
If is a sequence of random variables such that
with
and
for every
, then for all
,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ12_HTML.gif)
where .
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a random variable and
be an array of constants satisfying (1.10),
. Then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ13_HTML.gif)
Proof.
If , by
and Lyapounov's inequality, then
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ14_HTML.gif)
Hence, (1.7) is satisfied. From the proof of (2.1) of Sung [15], we obtain easily that the result holds.
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
Let . For all
, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ15_HTML.gif)
To obtain (1.9), we need only to prove that and
.
By Lemma 2.2, one gets
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ16_HTML.gif)
Before the proof of , we prove firstly
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ17_HTML.gif)
For ,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ18_HTML.gif)
For ,
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ19_HTML.gif)
Thus (2.6) holds. So, to prove , it is enough to show that
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ20_HTML.gif)
By the Chebyshev inequality and Lemma 2.1, for , we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ21_HTML.gif)
For , we consider the following two cases.
If , note that
. We have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ22_HTML.gif)
If , note that
. we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ23_HTML.gif)
Next, we prove in the following two cases.
If or
, take
. Noting that
, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ24_HTML.gif)
If or
, one gets
. Since
, it implies
. Therefore, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ25_HTML.gif)
for all . Hence,
. Taking
, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ26_HTML.gif)
Proof of Theorem 1.4.
By (1.9), a standard computation (see page 120 of Baum and Katz [11] or page 1472 of An and Yuan [9]), and the Borel-Cantelli Lemma, we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ27_HTML.gif)
For any , there exists an integer
such that
. So
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ28_HTML.gif)
From (2.16) and (2.17), we have
![](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1155%2F2011%2F157816/MediaObjects/13660_2010_Article_2323_Equ29_HTML.gif)
References
Bradley RC: On the spectral density and asymptotic normality of weakly dependent random fields. Journal of Theoretical Probability 1992,5(2):355–373. 10.1007/BF01046741
Bryc W, Smoleński W: Moment conditions for almost sure convergence of weakly correlated random variables. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 1993,119(2):629–635. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1993-1149969-7
Yang SC: Some moment inequalities for partial sums of random variables and their application. Chinese Science Bulletin 1998,43(17):1823–1828.
Wu QY: Convergence for weighted sums of mixing random sequences. Mathematica Applicata 2002,15(1):1–4.
Wu Q, Jiang Y: Some strong limit theorems for -mixing sequences of random variables. Statistics & Probability Letters 2008,78(8):1017–1023. 10.1016/j.spl.2007.09.061
Peligrad M, Gut A: Almost-sure results for a class of dependent random variables. Journal of Theoretical Probability 1999,12(1):87–104. 10.1023/A:1021744626773
Gan SX: Almost sure convergence for -mixing random variable sequences. Statistics & Probability Letters 2004,67(4):289–298. 10.1016/j.spl.2003.12.011
Utev S, Peligrad M: Maximal inequalities and an invariance principle for a class of weakly dependent random variables. Journal of Theoretical Probability 2003,16(1):101–115. 10.1023/A:1022278404634
An J, Yuan DM: Complete convergence of weighted sums for -mixing sequence of random variables. Statistics & Probability Letters 2008,78(12):1466–1472. 10.1016/j.spl.2007.12.020
Budsaba K, Chen P, Volodin A: Limiting behaviour of moving average processes based on a sequence of mixing and negatively associated random variables. Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics 2007, 26: 17–25.
Baum LE, Katz M: Convergence rates in the law of large numbers. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1965, 120: 108–123. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1965-0198524-1
Hsu PL, Robbins H: Complete convergence and the law of large numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1947, 33: 25–31. 10.1073/pnas.33.2.25
Erdös P: On a theorem of Hsu and Robbins. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1949, 20: 286–291. 10.1214/aoms/1177730037
Spitzer F: A combinatorial lemma and its application to probability theory. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 1956, 82: 323–339. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1956-0079851-X
Sung SH: On the strong convergence for weighted sumsof random variables. Statistical Papers. In press
Chen P, Hu T-C, Liu X, Volodin A: On complete convergence for arrays of rowwise negatively associated random variables. RossiÄskaya Akademiya Nauk 2007,52(2):393–397.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Academic Editor and the reviewers for comments that greatly improved the paper. This work is partially supported by Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (no. 11040606M04), Major Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (no. 309017), National Important Special Project on Science and Technology (2008ZX10005-013), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (11001052, 10971097, and 10871001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, XC., Tan, CC. & Lin, JG. On the Strong Laws for Weighted Sums of -Mixing Random Variables.
J Inequal Appl 2011, 157816 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/157816
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/157816