- Research Article
- Open Access

# Superstability of Generalized Derivations

- Esmaeil Ansari-Piri
^{1}Email author and - Ehsan Anjidani
^{1}

**2010**:740156

https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/740156

© E. Ansari-Piri and E. Anjidani. 2010

**Received:**23 February 2010**Accepted:**15 April 2010**Published:**24 May 2010

## Abstract

## Keywords

- Banach Space
- Functional Equation
- Additive Mapping
- Operator Algebra
- Banach Algebra

## 1. Introduction

The well-known problem of stability of functional equations started with a question of Ulam [1] in 1940. In 1941, Ulam's problem was solved by Hyers [2] for Banach spaces. Aoki [3] provided a generalization of Hyers' theorem for approximately additive mappings. In 1978, Rassias [4] generalized Hyers' theorem by obtaining a unique linear mapping near an approximate additive mapping.

*and*are real normed spaces with complete, is a mapping such that for each fixed the mapping is continuous on , and there exist and such that

In 1994, G vruţa [5] provided a generalization of Rassias' theorem in which he replaced the bound in (1.1) by a general control function .

Since then several stability problems for various functional equations have been investigated by many mathematicians (see [6–8]).

The various problems of the stability of derivations and generalized derivations have been studied during the last few years (see, e.g., [9–18]). The purpose of this paper is to prove the superstability of generalized (ring) derivations on Banach algebras.

The following result which is called the superstability of ring homomorphisms was proved by Bourgin [19] in 1949.

where and are mappings on algebra with an approximate identity.

where . Our results in this section generalize some results of Moslehian's paper [14]. It has been shown by Moslehian [14, Corollary ] that for an approximate generalized derivation on a Banach algebra , there exists a unique generalized derivation near . We show that the approximate generalized derivation is a generalized derivation (see Corollary 3.6).

Let be an algebra. An additive map is said to be ring derivation on if for all . Moreover, if for all , then is a derivation. An additive mapping (resp., linear mapping) is called a generalized ring derivation (resp., generalized derivation) if there exists a ring derivation (resp., derivation) such that for all .

## 2. Superstability of (1.5) and (1.6)

Here we show the superstability of the functional equations (1.5) and (1.6). We prove the superstability of (1.6) without any additional conditions on the mapping .

Theorem 2.1.

Proof.

Theorem 2.2.

Proof.

By taking the limit as , we have . Since has a left approximate identity, we have .

In the next theorem, we prove the superstability of (1.5) with no additional functional inequality on the mapping .

Theorem 2.3.

Proof.

for all . Then for all and all , and so by taking the limit as , we have . Now we obtain , since has an approximate identity.

for all . Therefore, we have .

The following theorem states the conditions on the mapping under which the sequence converges for all .

Theorem 2.4.

for all . Then exists and for all .

Proof.

## 3. Superstability of the Generalized Derivations

Our purpose is to prove the superstability of generalized ring derivations and generalized derivations. Throughout this section, is a Banach algebra with a two-sided approximate identity.

Theorem 3.1.

for all . Then is a generalized ring derivation and is a ring derivation. Moreover, for all .

Proof.

Put and in (3.3). We have , and so for all .

Then by (3.2) and applying Theorem 2.4, we have and for all .

for all . It follows from (3.1) and Theorem 2.3 that , , and for all .

It suffices to show that and are additive.

Putting and replacing by in (3.7), we have . Similarly, .

Replacing by and by in (3.7), we obtain for all . Therefore is an additive mapping.

Since , is additive, and has an approximate identity, is additive.

Theorem 3.2.

for all . Then is a generalized ring derivation and is a ring derivation. Moreover, for all .

Proof.

for all . Putting in (3.10), it follows from Theorem 2.3 that and for all and for all .

for all . Hence, by the same reasoning as in the proof of Theorem 3.1, and are additive mappings. Therefore, is a generalized ring derivation and is a ring derivation.

Remark 3.3.

We note that Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 and all that following results are obtained with no special conditions on the mapping (see [21, Theorems 2.1 and 2.5]).

Corollary 3.4.

for all . Then is a generalized ring derivation and is a ring derivation.

Proof.

Let . For , if , then satisfies (3.1), (3.2), and we apply Theorem 3.1, and if , then we apply Theorem 3.2 since has conditions (3.8), (3.9) in this case.

For , apply Theorem 3.2 if and apply Theorem 3.1 if .

Theorem 3.5.

for all and all . Then is a generalized derivation and is a derivation.

Proof.

Suppose that satisfies (3.1), (3.2). By Theorem 3.1, is a generalized ring derivation and is a ring derivation. Moreover, for all .

Hence, by taking the limit as , we get for all and .

for all . Now by [21, Lemma 2.4], is a linear mapping and hence is a linear mapping.

The following result generalizes Corollary and Theorem of [14].

Corollary 3.6.

for all and all . Then is a generalized derivation and is a derivation.

Proof.

Theorem 3.7.

for all . If is continuous in for each fixed , then is a generalized derivation and is a derivation.

Proof.

Suppose that satisfies (3.1), (3.2). By Theorem 3.1, is a generalized ring derivation, is a ring derivation, and for all .

for all . Therefore, is -linear.

for all . Therefore, the mapping is linear and it follows that is linear.

Corollary 3.8.

for all . Suppose that is continuous in for each fixed . Then is a generalized derivation and is a derivation.

Proof.

Let , define , and apply Theorem 3.7.

Theorem 3.9.

for and all . If is continuous in for each fixed , then is a generalized derivation and is a derivation.

Proof.

Let . By Theorem 3.7, it suffices to prove that satisfies (3.1), (3.2).

Then , and so . Hence satisfies (3.1).

The theorems similar to Theorem 3.9 have been proved by the assumption that the relations similar to (3.29) are true for , (see, e.g., [9, 14]). We proved Theorem 3.9, under condition that inequality (3.29) is true for .

## Declarations

### Acknowledgment

The authors express their thanks to the referees for their helpful suggestions to improve the paper.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Ulam SM:
*Problems in Modern Mathematics*. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA; 1964:xvii+150.MATHGoogle Scholar - Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation.
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*1941, 27: 222–224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Aoki T: On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces.
*Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan*1950, 2: 64–66. 10.2969/jmsj/00210064MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Rassias ThM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces.
*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1978, 72(2):297–300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Găvruţa P: A generalization of the Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of approximately additive mappings.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*1994, 184(3):431–436. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1211MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Czerwik S (Ed):
*Stability of Functional Equations of Ulam-Hyers- Rassias Type*. Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Fla, USA; 2003.MATHGoogle Scholar - Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias ThM:
*Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications*. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA; 1998:vi+313.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Rassias ThM (Ed):
*Functional Equations, Inequalities and Applications*. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; 2003:x+224.MATHGoogle Scholar - Amyari M, Rahbarnia F, Sadeghi G: Some results on stability of extended derivations.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2007, 329(2):753–758. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.07.027MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Badora R: On approximate derivations.
*Mathematical Inequalities & Applications*2006, 9(1):167–173.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Jung Y-S: On the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of module left derivations.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008, 339(1):108–114. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.003MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Miura T, Hirasawa G, Takahasi S-E: A perturbation of ring derivations on Banach algebras.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2006, 319(2):522–530. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.06.060MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS: Almost derivations on
-ternary rings.
*Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society. Simon Stevin*2007, 14(1):135–142.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS: Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of generalized derivations.
*International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences*2006, 2006:-8.Google Scholar - Moslehian MS: Superstability of higher derivations in multi-Banach algebras.
*Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences*2008, 24(4):417–427.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS: Ternary derivations, stability and physical aspects.
*Acta Applicandae Mathematicae*2008, 100(2):187–199. 10.1007/s10440-007-9179-xMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Park C-G: Homomorphisms between
-algebras,
-derivations on a
-algebra and the Cauchy-Rassias stability.
*Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications*2005, 10(5):751–776.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Park C-G: Linear derivations on Banach algebras.
*Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications*2004, 9(3):359–368.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Bourgin DG: Approximately isometric and multiplicative transformations on continuous function rings.
*Duke Mathematical Journal*1949, 16: 385–397. 10.1215/S0012-7094-49-01639-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Šemrl P: The functional equation of multiplicative derivation is superstable on standard operator algebras.
*Integral Equations and Operator Theory*1994, 18(1):118–122. 10.1007/BF01225216MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Cao H-X, Lv J-R, Rassias JM: Superstability for generalized module left derivations and generalized module derivations on a Banach module (I).
*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*2009, 2009:-10.Google Scholar - Kang S-Y, Chang I-S: Approximation of generalized left derivations.
*Abstract and Applied Analysis*2008, 2008:-8.Google Scholar - Grabiec A: The generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of a class of functional equations.
*Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen*1996, 48(3–4):217–235.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Jung S-M: On modified Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of a generalized Cauchy functional equation.
*Nonlinear Studies*1998, 5(1):59–67.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar - Forti G-L: Comments on the core of the direct method for proving Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations.
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2004, 295(1):127–133. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.03.011MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar - Brzdęk J, Pietrzyk A: A note on stability of the general linear equation.
*Aequationes Mathematicae*2008, 75(3):267–270. 10.1007/s00010-007-2894-6MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.