- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Hankel determinant for a general subclass of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions defined by Ruscheweyh operators
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2024, Article number: 14 (2024)
Abstract
Making use of the Hankel determinant and the Ruscheweyh derivative, in this work, we consider a general subclass of m-fold symmetric normalized biunivalent functions defined in the open unit disk. Moreover, we investigate the bounds for the second Hankel determinant of this class and some consequences of the results are presented. In addition, to demonstrate the accuracy on some functions and conditions, most general programs are written in Python V.3.8.8 (2021).
1 Introduction
Let \(\mathcal{A}\) denote the class of the analytic functions f in the open unit disk \(\mathbb{U}=\{z \in \mathbb{C}:|z|<1\}\), normalized by the conditions \(f(0)=f^{\prime}(0)-1=0\) of the Taylor–Maclaurin series expansion
Further, assume that \(\mathcal{S}\) denotes the subclass of \(\mathcal{A}\) that contains all univalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\) satisfying (1.1) and \(\mathcal{P}\) represents the subclass of all functions \(h(z)\) of the form
which are analytic in the open unit disk \(\mathbb{U}\) and \(\operatorname{Re}(h(z))>0\), \(z \in \mathbb{U}\).
For a function \(f \in \mathcal{A}\) defined by (1.1), the Ruscheweyh derivative operator (see [23]) is defined by
where \(\delta \in \mathbb{N}_{0}=\{0,1,2, \ldots \}=\mathbb{N} \cup \{0\}\), \(z \in \mathbb{U}\), and
The Koebe 1/4-theorem (see [12]) asserts that every univalent function \(f \in \mathcal{S}\) has an inverse \(f^{-1}\) defined by
The inverse function \(g=f^{-1}\) has the form
A function \(f \in \mathcal{A}\) is said to be biunivalent if both f and \(f^{-1}\) satisfy the univalent property. The class of biunivalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\) is denoted by Σ. Some examples of functions in the class Σ are given as follows:
with the corresponding inverse functions
respectively.
Determination of the estimates for the Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients \(a_{n}\) is a crucial problem in geometric function theory and provides knowledge about the geometric characteristics of these functions. Lewin [17] investigated the class Σ of biunivalent functions and showed that \(\vert a_{2} \vert <1.51\) for the functions belonging to the class Σ. Brannan and Clunie [8] conjectured that \(\vert a_{2} \vert \leq \sqrt{2}\). Subsequently, Netanyahu [20] showed that max \(\vert a_{2} \vert =\frac{4}{3}\) for f∈ Σ. Srivastava et al. [26] improved the investigation for various subclasses of the biunivalent function class Σ and established bounds on \(\vert a_{2} \vert \) and \(\vert a_{3} \vert \) in recent years. Many recent studies are devoted to studying the biunivalent functions class Σ and obtaining nonsharp bounds on the Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients \(\vert a_{2} \vert \) and \(\vert a_{3} \vert \) (see, for example, [1, 7, 18, 29, 30]). However, the coefficient estimates bound of \(\vert a_{n} \vert (n \in \{4,5,6, \ldots \})\) for a function \(f \in \Sigma \) defined by (1.1) remains an open problem. In fact, there is no natural way to obtain the upper bound for coefficients greater than three. In exceptional cases, there are some articles in which Faber polynomial techniques were used for finding upper bounds for higher-order coefficients (see, for example, [4, 6, 31]).
The Hankel determinant is a valuable tool in studying univalent functions whose components are coefficients of functions in the subclasses of \(\mathcal{S}\). The Hankel determinants \(H_{q}(n)\) \((n, q \in \mathbb{N})\) of the function f are defined by (see [21])
Note that
and
Estimates for the upper bounds of \(\vert H_{2}(1) \vert = \vert a_{3}-a_{2}^{2} \vert \) and \(\vert H_{2}(2) \vert = \vert a_{2} a_{4}-a_{3}^{2} \vert \) are called Fekete–Szegö and second Hankel determinant problems, respectively. Additionally, Fekete and Szegö [13] proposed the summarized functional \(a_{3}-\mu a_{2}^{2}\), in which μ is some real number. Lee et al. [16] presented a concise overview of Hankel determinants for analytic univalent functions and obtained bounds for \(\mathrm{H}_{2}(2)\) for functions belonging to some classes defined by subordination. The estimation of \(|\mathrm{H}_{2}(2)|\) has been the focus of recent Hankel determinant papers (see, for example, [5, 11, 22, 25, 32]).
For each function \(f \in \mathcal{S}\), the function
is univalent and maps the unit disk into a region with m-fold symmetry. A function f is said to be m-fold symmetric (see [15]) and denoted by \(\mathcal{A}_{m}\), if it has the following normalized form:
We denote by \(\mathcal{S}_{m}\) the class of m-fold symmetric univalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\), which are normalized by the series expansion (1.5). In fact, the functions in the class \(\mathcal{S}\) are 1-fold symmetric. In view of the work of Koepf [15] the m-fold symmetric function \(h \in \mathcal{P}\) is of the form
Analogous to the concept of m-fold symmetric univalent functions, Srivastava et al. [27] defined the concept of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions in a direct way. Each function \(f \in \Sigma \) generates an m-fold symmetric biunivalent function for each \(m \in \mathbb{N}\). The normalized form of f is given as (1.5) and the extension \(g=f^{-1}\) is as follows:
We denote by \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{m}}\) the class of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\). For \(m=1\), the series (1.7) coincides with the series (1.3) of the class Σ. Some examples of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions are given as follows:
with the corresponding inverse functions
respectively.
Recently, some authors have studied the m-fold symmetric biunivalent function class \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{m}}\) (see, for example, [9, 19, 28, 33]) and obtained nonsharp bound estimates on the first two Taylor–Maclaurin coefficients \(\vert a_{m+1} \vert \) and \(\vert a_{2 m+1} \vert \). In this respect, Altinkaya and Yalçin [3] obtained nonsharp estimates on the second Hankel determinant for the subclass \(H_{\Sigma _{m}}(\beta )\) of the m-fold symmetric biunivalent function class \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{m}}\).
For a function \(f \in \mathcal{A}_{m}\) defined by (1.5), analogous to the Ruscheweyh derivative \(\mathcal{R}^{\gamma}: \mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{A}\), the m-fold Ruscheweyh derivative \(\mathcal{R}^{\gamma}: \mathcal{A}_{m} \rightarrow \mathcal{A}_{m}\) is defined as follows (see [24]):
Considering the significant role of the Hankel determinant in recent years, the object of this paper is to study estimates for \(\vert H_{2}(2) \vert \) of a general subclass of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\) by applying the m-fold Ruscheweyh derivative operator and to obtain upper bounds on \(\vert a_{m+1} a_{3 m+1}-a_{2 m+1}^{2} \vert \) for functions in the subclass \(\Xi _{\Sigma _{m}}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\).
In order to derive our main results, we need to define the following lemmas that will be useful in proving the basic theorem of Sect. 2.
Lemma 1.1
[12] If the function \(h \in \mathcal{P}\) is given by the series (1.2), then
and
Lemma 1.2
[14] If the function \(h \in \mathcal{P}\) is given by the series (1.2), then
and
for some x, z with \(|x| \leq 1\) and \(|z| \leq 1\).
2 The main result and consequences
Our main aim in this section is to study estimates for the second Hankel determinant of the subclass \(\Xi _{\Sigma _{m}}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\) of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions in \(\mathbb{U}\), and we show that our results are an improvement on the existing coefficient estimates.
Definition 2.1
A function \(f \in \Sigma _{m}\) given by (1.5) is said to be in the class \(\Xi _{\Sigma _{m}}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\) (\(\lambda \geq 1 \), \(\gamma \in \mathbb{N}_{0}\), \(0 \leq \beta <1\) and m∈ \(\mathbb{N}\)) if it satisfies the conditions
and
where \(z, w \in \mathbb{U}\) and the function \(g=f^{-1}\) is given by (1.7).
Theorem 2.1
Let \(f \in \Xi _{\Sigma _{m}}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\) be given by (1.5). Then,
where
and
Proof
It follows from (2.1) and (2.2) that there exist p and q in the class \(\mathcal{P}\) such that
and
where p and q are given by the series (1.6).
We also find that
and
Equating coefficients in (2.7) and (2.8) we have
and
From (2.11) and (2.14), we obtain
and
Now, from (2.12), (2.15), and (2.18), we obtain
Also, from (2.13), (2.16), (2.18), and (2.19), we find that
Then, from (2.18), (2.19), and (2.20) we have that
According to Lemma 1.2 and (2.17), we can write
and
for some x, y, z, and w with \(|x| \leq 1\), \(|y| \leq 1\), \(|z| \leq 1\), and \(|w| \leq 1\). Using (2.22) and (2.23) in (2.21) we obtain
Since p in the class \(\mathcal{P}\), we have (Lemma 1.1) \(\vert p_{m} \vert \leq 2\). Letting \(p_{m}=\rho \), we may assume, without loss of generality, that \(\rho \in [0,2]\). Thus, for \(\mu _{1}=|x| \leq 1\) and \(\mu _{2}=|y| \leq 1\), we obtain
where
Figure 1 demonstrates that \(F_{1}\), \(F_{2}\), \(F_{4}\) are non-negatives, and \(F_{3}\) is non-positive.
Now, we need to maximize
in the closed square \(\mathbb{S}=[0,1] \times [0,1]\) for \(\rho \in [0,2]\). We investigate the maximum of \(F (\mu _{1}, \mu _{2} )\) when \(\rho \in (0,2)\), \(\rho =0\) and \(\rho =2\), keeping in mind the sign of
(according to the Second Derivative Test for functions of the two dependent variables \(\mu _{1}\) and \(\mu _{2}\)).
First, let \(\rho \in (0,2)\). Since \(F_{3}<0\) and \(F_{3}+2 F_{4}>0\) for \(\rho \in (0,2)\) (see Fig. 2), we see that
Thus, the function F cannot have a local maximum in the interior of the square \(\mathbb{S}\). Now, we investigate the maximum of F on the boundary of the square \(\mathbb{S}\).
Case 1. For \(\mu _{1}=0\) and \(\mu _{2} \in [0,1]\) (a similar argument can be applied for \(\mu _{2}=0\) and \(\mu _{1} \in [0,1]\), so we omit the details in that case), we obtain
Subcase 1. Let \(F_{3}+F_{4} \geq 0\). In this case, for \(0<\mu _{2}<1\) we have that
that is, \(G (\mu _{2} )\) is an increasing function. Hence, the maximum of \(G (\mu _{2} )\) occurs at \(\mu _{2}=1\) and
Subcase 2. Let \(F_{3}+F_{4}<0\). Note that (see Fig. 3):
For \(\mu _{2} \in (0,1)\) since \(F_{3}+F_{4}<0\) we have that
so \(G^{\prime} (\mu _{2} )>0\). Thus, \(\max \{G (\mu _{2} ):\mu _{2} \in [0,1] \}=G(1)\).
Case 2. For \(\mu _{1}=1\) and \(\mu _{2}\in [0,1]\) (a similar argument can be applied for \(\mu _{2}=1\) and \(\mu _{1}\in [0,1]\), so we omit the details in that case), we obtain
Thus, an argument like in Subcases 1 and 2 yields
Next, let \(\rho =2\). Now, let \((\mu _{1},\mu _{2})\in \mathbb{S}\) and note that
Keeping in mind the constant value in (2.25) we have
Finally, let \(\rho =0\). Now, let \((\mu _{1},\mu _{2})\in \mathbb{S}\) and note that
We see that the maximum of \(F (\mu _{1}, \mu _{2} )\) occurs at \(\mu _{1}=\mu _{2}=1\) and
Combining all cases, note that since \(F_{1}+2 (F_{2}+F_{3} )+4 F_{4}\geq 0\) when \(\rho \in [0,2]\) (see Fig. 4), we have
Let \(K:[0,2] \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be given by
Substituting the values of \(F_{1}\), \(F_{2}\), \(F_{3}\), and \(F_{4}\) in the function K defined by (2.26), yields
Now, the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) occurs either at \(\rho =0\), \(\rho \in (0,2)\) or \(\rho =2\). Suppose first the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) occurs at some \(\rho \in (0,2)\). Note that for any \(\rho \in (0,2)\) we have
Next, we conclude the following results:
Result 1. Let
that is,
where \(\omega _{1}\), \(\omega _{2}\), \(\omega _{3}\), and \(\omega _{4}\) are given by (2.3), (2.4), (2.5), and (2.6), respectively.
Note that \(K^{\prime}(\rho )>0\) for every \(\rho \in (0,2)\). Thus,
Result 2. Let
that is,
Then, \(K^{\prime}(\rho )=0\) gives the critical point \(\rho _{1}=0\) or
When
we observe that \(\rho _{2} \geq 2\). Then, the maximum value of \(K(\rho )\) occurs at 0+ or 2−. This is a contradiction since we assumed the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) occurs at some \(\rho \in (0,2)\).
When
we observe that \(\rho _{2} \in (0,2)\). Since \(K^{\prime \prime} (\rho _{2} )<0\), the maximum value of \(K(\rho )\) occurs at \(\rho =\rho _{2}\). Thus, we have
Next, suppose if \(\beta \in [0, \tau ]\) and the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) occurs at \(\rho =2\). Then,
We only now need to note that (see the idea in the second part of Result 2) if \(\beta \in (\tau , 1)\) then the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) cannot occur at \(\rho =2 \) since
Finally, let us consider \(\beta \in [0,1)\) and the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) occurring at \(\rho =0\). Then,
We note that (see the ideas in the second part of Result 2) if \(\beta \in (\tau , 1)\) then the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) cannot occur at \(\rho =0 \) since
Finally, note that (see the ideas in Result 1 and the details in Result 2) if
or
then the maximum of \(K(\rho )\) cannot occur at \(\rho =0\) since \(K(0) \leq K(2)\).
This completes the proof. □
By setting \(\lambda =1\) and \(\gamma =0\) in Theorem 2.1, we obtain the following consequence.
Corollary 2.1
[3] Let \(f \in \Xi _{\Sigma _{\mathrm{m}}}(\beta )\) (\(0 \leq \beta <1\)) be given by (1.5). Then,
where
and
By taking \(m=1\) in Theorem 2.1, we conclude the following result.
Corollary 2.2
Let \(f \in \Xi _{\Sigma}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\) (\(\lambda \geq 1, \gamma \in \mathbb{N}_{0}, 0 \leq \beta <1 \)) be given by (1.1). Then,
where
and
Remark 2.1
Corollary 2.2 improves a result in Altinkaya and Yalçin [2, Theorem 3].
By putting \(\gamma =0\) in Corollary 2.2, we obtain the following result.
Corollary 2.3
Let \(f \in \Xi _{\Sigma}(\lambda ; \beta )\) (\(\lambda \geq 1\), \(0 \leq \beta <1\)) be given by (1.1). Then,
where
and
Remark 2.2
Corollary 2.3 improves a result in Altinkaya and Yalçin [2, Corollary 5].
By setting \(\lambda =1\) in Corollary 2.3, we obtain the following consequence.
Corollary 2.4
[10] Let \(f \in \Xi _{\Sigma}(\beta )\) (\(0 \leq \beta <1\)) be given by (1.1). Then,
Remark 2.3
Corollary 2.4 recovers a result in Altinkaya and Yalçin [2, Corollary 4].
3 Concluding remarks
In this investigation, we consider a constructed subclass \(\Xi _{\Sigma _{m}}(\lambda , \gamma ; \beta )\) of the class \(\Sigma _{m}\) of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions and several properties of the results are discussed. Moreover, with a specialization of the parameters, some consequences of the class are mentioned and they improve some existing upper bounds for \(H_{2}(2)\) on certain subclasses of 1-fold symmetric biunivalent functions.
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Alimohammadia, D., Cho, N.E., Adegani, E.A.: Coefficient bounds for subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Filomat 34(14), 4709–4721 (2020)
Altinkaya, S., Yalçin, S.: Second Hankel determinant for a general subclass of bi-univalent functions associated with the Ruscheweyh derivative. Acta Univ. Apulensis 43, 199–208 (2014)
Altinkaya, S., Yalçin, S.: Hankel determinant for m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Creative Math. Inform. 28(1), 1–8 (2019)
Amourah, A.A.: Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for a class of analytic bi-univalent functions. AIP Conf. Proc. 2096(1), 020024 (2019)
Atshan, W.G., Al-Sajjad, R.A., Altinkaya, S.: On the Hankel determinant of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions using a new operator. Gazi Univ. J. Sci. 36(1), 349–360 (2023)
Attiya, A.A., Albalahi, A.M., Hassan, T.S.: Coefficient estimates for certain families of analytic functions associated with Faber polynomial. J. Funct. Spaces 2023, 1–6 (2023)
Bilal, K., Srivastava, H.M., Tahir, M., Darus, M., Ahmad, Q.Z., Khan, N.: Applications of a certain q-integral operator to the subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. AIMS Math. 6(1), 1024–1039 (2020)
Brannan, D.A., Clunie, J.G.: Aspects of Contemporary Complex Analysis. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute Held at the University of Durham, Durham; July 1–20, 1979. Academic Press, London (1980)
Breaz, D., Cotîrlă, L.-I.: The study of coefficient estimates and Fekete–Szegö inequalities for the new classes of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions defined using an operator. J. Inequal. Appl. 2023, 15 (2023)
Çağlar, M., Deniz, E., Srivastava, H.M.: Second Hankel determinant for certain subclasses of bi-univalent functions. Turk. J. Math. 41, 694–706 (2017)
Çağlar, M., Orhan, H., Srivastava, H.M.: Coefficient bounds for q-starlike functions associated with q-Bernoulli numbers. J. Appl. Anal. Comput. (2023). https://doi.org/10.11948/20220566
Duren, P.L.: Univalent Functions. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 259. Springer, New York (1983)
Fekete, M., Szegö, G.: Eine Bemerkung uber ungerade schlichte Funktionen. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 8, 85–89 (1933)
Grenander, U., Szegö, G.: Toeplitz Forms and Their Application. California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences. Univ. Calofornia Press, Berkely (1958)
Koepf, W.: Coefficients of symmetric functions of bounded boundary rotation. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 105, 324–329 (1989)
Lee, S.K., Ravichandran, V., Supramaniam, S.: Bounds for the second Hankel determinant of certain univalent functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 281 (2013)
Lewin, M.: On a coefficient problem for bi-univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 18(1), 63–68 (1967)
Madaana, V., Kumar, A., Ravichandran, V.: Estimates for initial coefficients of certain bi-univalent functions. Filomat 35(6), 1993–2009 (2021)
Motamednezhad, A., Salehian, S.: Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Tbil. Math. J. 12(2), 163–176 (2019)
Netanyahu, E.: The minimal distance of the image boundary from the origin and the second coefficient of a univalent function in \(|z| < 1\). Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 32(2), 100–112 (1969)
Noonan, J.W., Thomas, D.K.: On the second Hankel determinant of areally mean p-valent functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 223, 337–346 (1976)
Orhan, H., Arıkan, H., Çağlar, M.: Second Hankel determinant for certain subclasses of bi-starlike functions defined by differential operators. Sahand Commun. Math. Anal. 20(2), 65–83 (2023)
Ruscheweyh, S.: New criteria for univalent functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 49, 109–115 (1975)
Sabir, P.O.: Coefficient estimate problems for certain subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions associated with the Ruscheweyh derivative, 1–20 (2023). arXiv:2304.11571
Shrigan, M.G.: Second Hankel determinant for bi-univalent functions associated with q-differential operator. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Math. Phys. 15(5), 663–671 (2022)
Srivastava, H.M., Mishra, A.K., Gochhayat, P.: Certain subclasses of analytic and bi-univalent functions. Appl. Math. Lett. 23, 1188–1192 (2010)
Srivastava, H.M., Sivasubramanian, S., Sivakuma, R.: Initial coeffcient bounds for a subclass of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. Tbil. Math. J. 7(2), 1–10 (2014)
Srivastava, H.M., Wanas, A.K.: Initial Maclaurin coefficients bounds for new subclasses of analytic and m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions defined by a linear combination. Kyungpook Math. J. 59(3), 493–503 (2019)
Srivastava, H.M., Hussain, S., Ahmad, I., Ali Shah, S.G.: Coefficient bounds for analytic and bi-univalent functions associated with some conic domains. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 23, 741–753 (2022)
Srivastava, H.M., Gaboury, S., Ghanim, F.: Coefficient estimates for a general subclass of analytic and bi-univalent functions of the Ma–Minda type. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 112, 1157–1168 (2018)
Srivastava, H.M., Motamednezhad, A., Adegani, E.A.: Faber polynomial coefficient estimates for bi-univalent functions defined by using differential subordination and a certain fractional derivative operator. Mathematics 8(2), 172 (2020)
Srivastava, H.M., Murugusundaramoorthy, G., Bulboača, T.: The second Hankel determinant for subclasses of bi-univalent functions associated with a nephroid domain. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 116(4), 1–21 (2022)
Tang, H., Srivastava, H.M., Sivasubramanian, S., Gurusamy, P.: The Fekete-Szego functional problems for some subclasses of m-fold symmetric bi-univalent functions. J. Math. Inequal. 10, 1063–1092 (2016)
Acknowledgements
Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R153), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, P.O.S.; Data curation, S.J.M.F.; Formal analysis, N.C.; Funding acquisition, N.C.; Investigation, P.O.S., R.P.A., P.O.M., N.C. and T.A.; Methodology, P.O.S, R.P.A., N.C.and T.A.; Project administration, R.P.A.; Software, P.O.S., S.J.M.F. and P.O.M.; Supervision, T.A.; Validation, R.P.A. and P.O.M.; Visualization, P.O.S.; Writing – original draft, P.O.S., R.P.A. and P.O.M.; Writing – review & editing, P.O.S. and R.P.A. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sabir, P.O., Agarwal, R.P., Mohammedfaeq, S.J. et al. Hankel determinant for a general subclass of m-fold symmetric biunivalent functions defined by Ruscheweyh operators. J Inequal Appl 2024, 14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-024-03088-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-024-03088-3