- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
On generalizations of some integral inequalities for preinvex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2022, Article number: 157 (2022)
Abstract
In this paper, we establish some new \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities of Simpson’s second type for preinvex functions. Many results given in this paper provide generalizations and extensions of the results given in previous research. Moreover, some examples are given to illustrate the investigated results.
1 Introduction
Mathematical inequalities have been applied in the fields of both pure and applied mathematics [1–6]. Such inequalities have been continuously improved because they can be widely applied in those areas. One of the interesting functions employed to study the inequalities is a convex function defined as follows: A function \(f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}\) is convex if the inequality
holds for all \(x, y\in [a,b]\) and \(t\in [0,1]\).
A preinvex function is a generalization of the classical convex function that is defined as follows: A function f on the invex set \(\mathcal{K}\subset \mathbb{R}\) is preinvex with respect to \(\xi :\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\) if the inequality
holds for all \(x, y\in \mathcal{K}\) and \(t\in [0,1]\). For \(\xi (x,y)=x-y\), the preinvex functions reduce to the convex functions.
Simpson type inequalities are the most well-known inequalities associated with convex and preinvex functions. Simpson’s rules are techniques for the numerical integration and the numerical estimation of definite integrals, revealed by T. Simpson (1710–1761). Two famous Simpson’s rules are as follows:
-
1)
Simpson’s quadrature formula (Simpson’s \(1/3\) rule) is formulated as follows:
$$ \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{1}{6} \biggl[f(a)+4f \biggl( \frac{a+b}{2} \biggr)+f(b) \biggr],$$see [7] for more details.
-
2)
Simpson’s second formula (Simpson’s \(3/8\) rule) is formulated as follows:
$$ \int _{a}^{b}f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{1}{8} \biggl[f(a)+3f \biggl( \frac{2a+b}{3} \biggr)+3f \biggl( \frac{a+2b}{3} \biggr)+f(b) \biggr],$$see [8] for more details.
The error estimation for Simpson’s quadrature formula known as Simpson’s inequality is stated as follows.
Theorem 1.1
([7])
If \(f:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is a four times continuously differentiable function on \((a,b)\) and
then
The error estimation for Simpson’s second formula is stated as follows.
Theorem 1.2
([8])
If \(f:[a,b]\rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is a four times continuously differentiable function on \((a,b)\) and
then
Quantum calculus (briefly called q-calculus) is the study of calculus without limits. At the beginning of the q-calculus study, L. Euler (1707–1783) introduced Newton’s infinite series. Then, F. H. Jackson [9, 10] relied on the concept of L. Euler to define the q-derivative and q-integral (also called q-Jackson derivative and q-Jackson integral) of a continuous function on the interval \((0,\infty )\) in 1910. The main objective of q-calculus is to obtain the q-analogues of mathematical objects recaptured by taking \(q \to 1\). The topic of q-calculus has become an interesting topic for many researchers because it has applications in various areas of mathematics and physics, see [11–17] for more details and the references cited therein.
In 2013, J. Tariboon and S. K. Ntouyas [18] defined the new q-derivative and q-integral of a continuous function on a finite interval. Furthermore, they investigated the existence and uniqueness results of initial value problems for first and second order impulsive q-difference equations. In recent years, the q-calculus has been studied in various inequalities such as Hermite–Hadamard, Hermite–Hadamard-like, Ostrowski, Fejér, Hanh, and Simpson inequalities, see [19–27] and the references cited therein for more details. Especially, Simpson type inequalities have been also studied by using q-calculus for convex and preinvex functions by many researchers, see [28–39] and the references cited therein for more details.
Post quantum calculus (briefly called \((p,q)\)-calculus) is the generalization of q-calculus. The \((p,q)\)-calculus was firstly introduced by R. Chakrabarti and R. A. Jagannathan [40] in 1991. Then, Tunç et al. [41, 42] presented new \((p,q)\)-calculus of a continuous function on a finite interval in 2016. The \((p,q)\)-calculus includes two-parameter quantum calculus (p and q-numbers) which is independent. It is generally known that q-calculus cannot be got by taking q by \(q/p\) in q-calculus, but it can be obtained by taking \(p=1\) in \((p,q)\)-calculus. Moreover, the classical formula can be gained by taking \(q \to 1\). In the past few years, the topic of \((p,q)\)-calculus has become an interesting topic for many researchers, and the results of \((p,q)\)-calculus can be found in [43–49] and the references cited therein.
In 2020, S. Erden et al. [50] presented integral inequalities of Simpson’s second type inequalities for convex functions via q-calculus. They obtained more general results on Simpson’s second type quantum integral inequalities. By taking \(q\to 1\), they obtained classical results on Simpson’s 3/8 formula.
In 2020, Y. M. Chu et al. [51] presented some integral inequalities for preinvex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus. They obtained more general results on \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities.
Motivated by the above mentioned reports, we establish some new integral inequalities related to Simpson’s second type inequalities for preinvex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus. Many results given in this paper provide generalizations and extensions of other results given in previous papers. Moreover, we give some examples to show the investigated results.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we give some basic knowledge and notation. In Sect. 3, we give Simpson’s second type inequalities via \((p,q)\)-calculus for preinvex function. In Sect. 4, we display some special cases and some examples of our main results. In the final section, we summarize our results.
2 Preliminaries
In this section, we give basic knowledge used in our work. Throughout this paper, let \([a,b]\subseteq \mathbb{R}\) be an interval with \(a< b\) and \(0 < q < p \leq 1\) be constants. The definitions of \((p,q)\)-derivative and \((p,q)\)-integral are given in [41, 42]. The \((p,q)\)-number is given by
If \(p=1\), then \([n]_{p,q}\) is reduced to \([n]_{q}\), which is a quantum number.
Definition 2.1
If \(f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function, then the \((p,q)\)-derivative of function f at \(x\in [a,b]\) is defined by
The function f is said to be the \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \([a,b]\) if \({}_{a}D_{p,q}f (x)\) exists for all \(x \in [a,b]\).
In Definition 2.1, if \(p=1\), then \(_{a}D_{1,q}f (x)={} _{a}D_{q}f(x)\), and (2.1) reduces to
which is the q-derivative of function f defined on \([a,b]\), see [52–54] for more details. In addition, if \(a=0\), then \(_{0}D_{q}f (x)=D_{q}f (x)\), and (2.2) reduces to
which is the \(q_{a}\)-derivative of function f defined on \([0,b]\), see [55] for more details.
Example 2.1
Define function \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=x^{2}+C\), where C is a constant. Applying Definition 2.1for \(x\ne a\), we have
If \(p=1\), then (2.4) is reduced to \(D_{q}f(x)=(1+q)(x-a)+2a\). Furthermore, if \(p=1\), \(a=x\), and \(q \to 1\), then (2.4) reduces to the classical derivative.
Definition 2.2
If \(f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}\) is a continuous function, then the \((p,q)\)-integral of function f at \(x\in [a,b]\) is defined by
The function f is said to be the \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\) if \(\int _{a}^{b}{f (x)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}x\) exists for all \(x \in [a,b]\).
If \(a=0\), then (2.5) is the \((p,q)\)-integral on \([0,b]\), which can be expressed as follows:
In addition, if \(p=1\), then (2.6) reduces to
which is the q-Jackson integral of function f defined on \([0,b]\), see [55] for more details.
Example 2.2
Define function \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=Ax^{2}+Bx+C\), where A, B, and C are constants. Applying Definition 2.2, we have
If \(p=1\), then, in (2.8), \([2]_{p,q}\) and \([3]_{p,q}\) are reduced by \([2]_{q}\) and \([3]_{q}\), respectively. Furthermore, if \(p=1\) and \(q \to 1\), then (2.8) reduces to the classical integration.
Theorem 2.1
([41])
If f, \(g:[a,b]\) are continuous functions, \(c\in [a,b]\) and \(e\in \mathbb{R}\), then the following identities hold:
-
(i)
\(\int _{a}^{b}{(f(t)+g(t))}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t = \int _{a}^{b}{f (t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t +\int _{a}^{b}{g(t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t\);
-
(ii)
\(\int _{a}^{b}{ef(t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t =e \int _{a}^{b}{f (t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t\);
-
(iii)
\(\int _{c}^{b}{f (t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t = \int _{a}^{b}{f (t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t -\int _{a}^{c}{f (t)}_{a}\,d_{p,q}t\).
Lemma 2.1
([41])
For \(\alpha \in \mathbb{R}\backslash \{-1\}\), the following expression holds:
Theorem 2.2
([42])
If \(f,g:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) are continuous functions and \(r>0\) with \(1/s+1/r=1\), then
Theorem 2.3
([56])
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a convex differentiable function on \([a,b]\), then the \((p,q)\)-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities are as follows:
3 Main results
In 2020, Y. M. Chu et al. [51] presented a generalization of some \((p,q)\)-integral inequalities for preinvex function. Unfortunately, the results of the lemma and theorems are incorrect in the proofs. Here, we will show the errors of Theorem 1 in [51].
Statement 3.1
(Theorem 1, [51])
If \(f:[a,a+\xi (b,a)]\) is a \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \((a,a+\xi (b,a))\) with \(\xi (b,a)>0\) such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|\) is a preinvex function and \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,a+\xi (b,a)]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < p \leq 1\), then
where
Example 3.1
The \(f:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}\) is defined by \(f(x)=2x+5\). Then \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)|=|_{a}D_{p,q} (2x+5)|=2\) is a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([0,1]\). Applying Statement 3.1with \(p=1\), \(q=\frac{9}{10}\), and \(\xi (b,a)=b-a\), the left-hand side of (3.1) becomes
and the right-hand side of (3.1) becomes
This implies that
Therefore, Statement 3.1is not correct.
The established Statement 3.1 gives the result involving \((p,q)\)-integral identity as follows.
Statement 3.2
(Lemma 1, [51])
If \(f:[a,a+\xi (b,a)]\) is a \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \((a,a+\xi (b,a))\) with \(\xi (b,a)>0\) such that \(_{a}D_{p,q}f\) is a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,a+\xi (b,a)]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < p \leq 1\), then
where
In the following, we provide a modified version involving \((p,q)\)-integral identity for the preinvex function of Statement 3.2.
Theorem 3.1
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \((a,a+\xi (b,a))\) with \(\xi (b,a)>0\) such that \(_{a}D_{p,q}f\) is a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,a+\xi (b,a)]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < p \leq 1\), then
where
Proof
It is not difficult to see that
where
and
By Definition 2.1, we obtain
By Definition 2.2, Theorem 2.1, and (3.5), we have
Similarly, we have
and
Substituting (3.6), (3.7), and (3.8) in (3.4), we have
Multiplying the above equality with \(\xi (b,a)\), we obtain the required \((p,q)\)-integral identity. Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Corollary 3.1
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a \((p,q)\)-differentiable function on \((a,b)\) such that \(_{a}D_{p,q}f\) is a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < p \leq 1\), then
where
Remark 3.1
If \(p=1\), then (3.9) reduces to
where
which appeared in [50]. In addition, if \(q \to 1\), then (3.10) reduces to
where
which appeared in [57].
Theorem 3.2
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|\) is a preinvex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\), then
where
Proof
Using Theorem 3.1, Lemma 2.1, Definition 2.2, and the preinvexity of \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|\), we have
which completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.2
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\), then
where \(M_{i}(p,q)\), \(i=1, 2\), are given in Theorem 3.2.
Remark 3.2
If \(p=1\), then (3.12) reduces to
which appeared in [50]. In addition, if \(q \to 1\), then (3.13) reduces to
which appeared in [57].
Theorem 3.3
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\) is a preinvex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\) and \(r,s>1\) with \(1/r+1/s=1\), then
Proof
Using Theorem 3.1 and the Hölder inequality, we have
From the case when \(a = 0\) of Lemma 2.1, it follows that
and
From the case when \(a = 0\) of Lemma 2.1 and the preinvexity of \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\), we find that
and
Substituting (3.16) to (3.21) in (3.15), we obtain the required result. Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Corollary 3.3
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\) and \(r,s>1\) with \(1/r+1/s=1\), then
Remark 3.3
If \(p=1\), then (3.22) reduces to
which appeared in [50]. In addition, if \(q \to 1\), then (3.23) reduces to
which appeared in [57].
Theorem 3.4
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\) and \(r,s>1\) with \(1/r+1/s=1\), then
Proof
Using Corollary 3.1 and the Hölder inequality, we have
From the case when \(a = 0\) of Lemma 2.1, it follows that
and
Using Definition 2.2, it is not difficult to show that
From the case when \(a = 0\) of Lemma 2.1 and the convexity of \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\), we have
Similarly, we obtain
and
Substituting (3.26) to (3.31) in (3.25), we obtain the required result. Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Remark 3.4
If \(p=1\), then (3.24) reduces to
which appeared in [50]. In addition, if \(q \to 1\), then (3.32) reduces to
which appeared in [57].
Theorem 3.5
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\) and \(s\geq 1\), then
where \(\psi _{i}(p,q)\), \(i=1,2,\dots ,9\), are defined by
Proof
Using Theorem 3.1, the Hölder inequality, and the preinvexity of \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\), we have
Using Definition 2.2, Theorem 2.1, and Lemma 2.1, we have
Hence, we gain (3.35). Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Corollary 3.4
If \(f:[a,b] \to \mathbb{R} \) is a continuous function such that \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f|^{s}\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([a,b]\), where \(\frac{7}{8}\leq q < 1\) and \(s\geq 1\), then
where \(\psi _{i}(p,q)\), \(i=1,2,\dots ,9\), are given in Theorem 3.5.
Remark 3.5
If \(p=1\), then (3.35) reduces to
which appeared in [50]. In addition, if \(q \to 1\), then (3.36) reduces to
which appeared in [57].
4 Examples
In this section, we give some examples of our main results.
Example 4.1
Define function \(f:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=2x+5\). Then \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)|=|_{a}D_{p,q} (2x+5)|=2\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([0,1]\). Applying Corollary 3.2with \(p=1\) and \(q=\frac{9}{10}\), the left-hand side of (3.12) becomes
and the right-hand side of (3.12) becomes
It is clear that
which demonstrates the result described in Corollary 3.2.
Example 4.2
Define function \(f:[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}\) by \(f(x)=2x+1\). Then \(|_{a}D_{p,q}f(x)|^{s}=|_{a}D_{p,q} (1-x)|^{s}=2^{s}\) is a convex function and a \((p,q)\)-integrable function on \([0,1]\). Applying Corollary 3.3with \(p=1\), \(q=\frac{9}{10}\), \(r=2\), and \(s=2\), the left-hand side of (3.22) by using Example 4.1becomes
and the right-hand side of (3.22) becomes
It is clear that
which demonstrates the result described in Theorem 3.3.
5 Conclusion
In this work, we used \((p,q)\)-calculus to establish new integral inequalities related to Simpson’s second type inequalities for preinvex functions. The presented results in this study generalize and extend some previous inequalities in the literature of Simpson’s second type inequalities. Moreover, some examples were given to show the investigated results.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Akin, L.: New principles of non-linear integral inequalities on time scales. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 6(1), 535–555 (2021)
Kabra, S., Nagar, H., Nisar, K.S., Suthar, D.L.: The Marichev-Saigo-Maeda fractional calculus operators pertaining to the generalized k-Struve function. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 5(2), 593–602 (2020)
Kaur, D., Agarwal, P., Rakshit, M., Chand, M.: Fractional calculus involving \((p,q)\)-Mathieu type series. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 5(2), 15–34 (2020)
Qi, H., Yussouf, M., Mehmood, S., Chu, Y.M., Farid, G.: Fractional integral versions of Hermite-Hadamard type inequality for generalized exponentially convexity. AIMS Math. 5(6), 6030–6042 (2020)
Khurshid, Y., Adil Khan, M., Chu, Y.M.: Conformable fractional integral inequalities for GG-and GA-convex function. AIMS Math. 5(5), 5012–5030 (2020)
Awan, M.U., Akhtar, N., Kashuri, A., Noor, M.A., Chu, Y.M.: 2D approximately reciprocal ρ-convex functions and associated integral inequalities. AIMS Math. 5(5), 4662–4680 (2020)
Dragomir, S.S., Agarwal, R.P., Cerone, P.: On Simpson’s inequality and applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 5, 533–579 (2000)
Kashuri, A., Mohammed, P.O., Abdeljawad, T., Hamasalh, F., Chu, Y.M.: New Simpson type integral inequalities for s-convex functions and their applications. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 1–12 (2020)
Jackson, F.H.: On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 193–203 (1910)
Jackson, F.H.: q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 32, 305–314 (1910)
Bangerezako, G.: Variational q-calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 289, 650–665 (2004)
Gauchman, H.: Integral inequalities in q calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 47, 281–300 (2004)
Miao, Y., Qi, F.: Several q-integral inequalities. J. Math. Inequal. 1, 115–121 (2009)
Raychev, P.P., Roussev, R.P., Smirnov, Yu.F.: The quantum algebra \(SU_{q}(2)\) and rotational spectra of deformed nuclei. J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 16(18), 137–141 (1990)
Gavrilik, A.M.: q-Serre relations in and q-deformed meson mass sum rules. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 27(3), 91–94 (1994)
Aral, A., Gupta, V., Agarwal, R.P.: Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory. Springer, New York (2013)
Ernst, T.: A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus. Springer, Basel (2012)
Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K.: Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 282 (2013)
Jhanthanam, S., Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K., Nonlaopon, K.: On q-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for differentiable convex functions. Mathematics 7, 632 (2019)
Prabseang, J., Nonlaopon, K., Ntouyas, S.K.: On the refinement of quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 14, 875–885 (2020)
Prabseang, J., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J.: Quantum Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and q-differentiable convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 13, 675–686 (2019)
Budak, H., Ali, M.A., Tarhanaci, M.: Some new quantum Hermite-Hadamard-like inequalities for coordinated convex functions. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 186, 899–910 (2020)
Noor, M.A., Awan, M.U., Noor, K.I.: Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 10, 1013–1018 (2016)
Vivas-Cortez, M.J., Kashuri, A., Liko, R., Hernández Hernández, J.E.: Quantum estimates of Ostrowski inequalities for generalized ϕ-convex functions. Symmetry 11, 1513 (2019)
Ali, M.A., Ntouyas, S.K., Tariboon, J.: Generalization of quantum Ostrowski-type integral inequalities. Mathematics 9, 1155 (2021)
Yang, W.: Some new Fejér type inequalities via quantum calculus on finite intervals. Sci. Asia 43, 123–134 (2017)
Du, T., Luo, C., Yu, B.: Certain quantum estimates on the parameterized integral inequalities and their applications. J. Math. Inequal. 15, 201–228 (2021)
Kalsoom, H., Wu, J.D., Hussain, S., Latif, M.A.: Simpson’s type inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions on quantum calculus. Symmetry 11(6), 768 (2019)
Tunç, M., Göv, E., Balgeçti, S.: Simpson type quantum integral inequalities for convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 19, 649–664 (2018)
Deng, Y., Awan, M.U., Wu, S.: Quantum integral inequalities of Simpson-type for strongly preinvex functions. Mathematics 7, 751 (2019)
Ali, M.A., Budak, H., Zhang, Z., Yildirim, H.: Some new Simpson’s type inequalities for coordinated convex functions in quantum calculus. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44(6), 1–26 (2020)
Ali, M.A., Abbas, M., Buda, H., Agarwal, P., Murtaza, G., Chu, Y.M.: New quantum boundaries for quantum Simpson’s and quantum Newton’s type inequalities for preinvex functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 64 (2021)
Vivas-Cortez, M., Ali, M.A., Kashuri, A., Sial, I.B., Zhang, Z.: Some new Newton’s type integral inequalities for co-ordinated convex functions in quantum calculus. Symmetry 12(9), 1476 (2020)
Wang, P.P., Zhu, T., Du, T.S.: Some inequalities using s-preinvexity via quantum calculus. J. Interdiscip. Math. 24, 613–636 (2021)
Kalsoom, H., Rashid, S., Idrees, M., Chu, Y.M., Baleanu, D.: Two-variable quantum integral inequalities of Simpson-type based on higher-order generalized strongly preinvex and quasi-preinvex functions. Symmetry 12, 51 (2020)
Budak, H., Erden, S., Ali, M.A.: Simpson and Newton type inequalities for convex functions via newly defined quantum integrals. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44(1), 378–390 (2020)
Vivas-Cortez, M., Liko, R., Kashuri, A., Hernández Hernández, J.E.: New quantum estimates of trapezium-type inequalities for generalized φ-convex functions. Mathematics 7, 1047 (2019)
Vivas-Cortez, M., Kashuri, A., Liko, R., Hernández Hernández, J.E.: Some inequalities using generalized convex functions in quantum analysis. Symmetry 11, 1402 (2019)
Vivas-Cortez, M., Kashuri, A., Liko, A., Hernández Hernández, J.E.: Quantum trapezium-type inequalities using generalized φ-convex functions. Axioms 9, 12 (2020)
Chakrabarti, R., Jagannathan, R.A.: \((p,q)\)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 24, L711–L718 (1991)
Tunç, M., Göv, E.: \((p,q)\)-Integral inequalities. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 19(97), 1–13 (2016)
Tunç, M., Göv, E.: Some integral inequalities via \((p, q)\)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 19(95), 1–12 (2016)
Latif, M.A., Kunt, M., Dragomir, S.S., İşcan, İ.: Post-quantum trapezoid type inequalities. AIMS Math. 5(4), 4011–4026 (2020)
Kunt, M., İşcan, İ., Alp, N., Sarikaya, M.Z.: \((p, q)\)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and \((p,q)\)-estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. 112, 969–992 (2018)
Soontharanon, J., Sitthiwirattham, T.: Fractional \((p,q)\)-calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 35 (2020)
Luangboon, W., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K.: Simpson- and Newton-type inequalities for convex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus. Mathematics 2021(9), 1338 (2021)
Prabseang, J., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J.: \((p,q)\)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and \((p,q)\)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 8, 68 (2019)
Thongjob, S., Nonlaopon, K., Ntouyas, S.K.: Some \((p, q)\)-Hardy type inequalities for \((p,q)\)-integrable functions. AIMS Math. 6, 77–89 (2020)
Wannalookkhee, F., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K.: On Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for coordinated convex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus. Mathematics 9, 698 (2021)
Erden, S., Iftikhar, S., Delavar, M.R., Kumam, P., Thounthong, P., Kumam, W.: On generalizations of some inequalities for convex functions via quantum integrals. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 114, 110 (2020)
Chu, Y.M., Awan, M.U., Talib, S., Iftikhar, S., Riahi, L.: New postquantum integral inequalities. J. Math. 2020, 1–10 (2020)
Noor, M.A., Noor, K.I., Awan, M.U.: Some quantum estimates for Hermite-Hadamard inequalities. Appl. Math. Comput. 251, 675–679 (2015)
Sudsutad, W., Ntouyas, S.K., Tariboon, J.: Quantum integral inequalities for convex functions. J. Math. Inequal. 9, 781–793 (2015)
Tariboon, J., Ntouyas, S.K.: Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 121 (2014)
Kac, V., Cheung, P.: Quantum Calculus. Springer, New York (2002)
Kunt, M., İşcan, İ., Alp, N., Sarikaya, M.Z.: \((p,q)\)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities and \((p,q)\)-estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 112, 969–992 (2018)
Noor, M.A., Noor, K.I., Iftikhar, S.: Newton’s inequalities for p-harmonic convex functions. Honam Math. J. 40(2), 239–250 (2018)
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Fundamental Fund of Khon Kaen University. The first author is supported by Development and Promotion of Science and Technology talents project (DPST), Thailand. We would like to thank anonymous referees for comments which are helpful for improvement in this paper.
Funding
This research was funded by National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), and King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok with Contract no. KMUTNB-FF-66-11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WL was a major contributor to writing the manuscript, conceptualization, investigation, and validation. KN performed the formal analysis, funding acquisition, validation, edition of the original draft preparation, and writing a revised version. JT dealt with the formal analysis, validation, and supervision. SKN dealt with the methodology, investigation, formal analysis, and validation. HB performed conceptualization, formal analysis, and validation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Luangboon, W., Nonlaopon, K., Tariboon, J. et al. On generalizations of some integral inequalities for preinvex functions via \((p,q)\)-calculus. J Inequal Appl 2022, 157 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02896-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02896-9
MSC
- 05A30
- 26A51
- 26D10
- 26D15
Keywords
- Simpson’s second type
- Preinvex function
- \((p,q)\)-calculus
- \((p,q)\)-differentiable function
- \((p,q)\)-integrable function