- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Class of operators related to a \((m,C)\)-isometric tuple of commuting operators
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2022, Article number: 105 (2022)
Abstract
This paper is concerned with studying a new class of multivariable commuting operators know as left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuples and related to a given conjugation transformation C on a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{Y}\). Some structural properties of some members of this class are given.
1 Introduction
The study of several variables of commuting operators has received great interest on the part of many researchers during recent years, and the reader is referred to the papers [3–6, 10–12, 17, 19–21, 24, 26, 27]. In this framework, our present aim in this paper is to give a new concept of multivariable operators, namely the left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple of operators. It should be noted that some developments on this subject for single variable operators have been carried out in [1, 8, 9, 13–15, 18, 22, 25, 28–30].
First, we introduce some concepts and symbols used in this work.
Let \({\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}} ]\) be the algebra of bounded linear operators on a separable complex Hilbert space \({\mathcal {Y}}\). We use , , and the set of complex numbers. For , let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) be a commuting p-tuple of operators (\(A_{j}:\mathcal{Y}\longrightarrow \mathcal{Y}\) is a bounded operator ). Let and set \(|\mu |: = \sum_{1\leq j\leq p}|\mu _{j}|\), \(\mu !: =\mu _{1}!\cdots \mu _{p}!\). Further, denote by \({\mathbf{ A}}^{\mu}:= A_{1}^{\mu _{1}} A_{2}^{\mu _{2}}\cdots A_{p}^{ \mu _{d}}\) where \(A_{j}^{\mu _{j}}=\underbrace{A_{j}.A_{j}\cdots .A_{j}}_{\mu _{j}\text{-times}}\) (\(1\leq j\leq p\)) and \({\mathbf{ A}}^{\ast}=(A_{1}^{\ast},\ldots ,A_{p}^{\ast})\). Recall that an antilinear transformation \(C \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal{Y}]\) is a conjugation if C satisfies \(\langle Cx\mid Cy\rangle =\overline{\langle x\mid y\rangle }\ \forall x, y \in \mathcal{Y}\) and \(C^{2}=I_{\mathcal {Y}}\) (see [16]). It should be noted that if C is a conjugation on \(\mathcal{Y}\), then
Let \((A,B)\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{2}\) and define the map \({\psi}_{A, B}:{\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}] \longrightarrow { \mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) by \(\psi _{A, B}(X)=BXA\). Moreover \(\psi _{A,B}^{(k)}(I_{\mathcal {Y}})=B^{k}A^{k}\) for all positive integer k, and consider the following quantity,
Equation (1.1) was the starting point of some authors to define classes of operators as follows:
(1) If \(A \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) satisfies \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}(A^{*},A)=0\) for some positive integer m,
A is said to be an m-isometric operator ([1]). If A satisfying \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}(A^{*},CAC)=0\) for some positive integer m and a conjugation C, A is said to be an \((m,C)\)-isometric operator ( [8] ).
(2) Let \(A \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) satisfying \(A^{*n}{\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}(A^{*},A)A^{n}=0\) for some positive integers m and n, then A is called an n-quasi-m-isometric operator ([23, 27] ). If A satisfies
for some positive integers m, n, and a conjugation C, then A is called an n-quasi-\((m, C)\)-isometric operator ( [22, 28] ).
(3) Let \(A \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) for which there exists \(B\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) such that \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}(B,A)=0\) for some positive integer m, then A is called left m-invertible ( [14, 15, 18, 25] ). If A and B satisfy \(A^{*n}{\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} (B,A )A^{n}=0\), for some positive integers n and, m, then A is called an n-quasileft m-invertible operator ([13] ).
Very recently, the authors of the present paper introduced the concepts of left \((m,C)\)-invertible and right \((m,C)\)-invertible operators. Let \(A \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) for which there exists \(B\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) such that \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}(B,CAC)=0\) for some positive integer m and conjugation operator C, then A is called a left \((m,C)\)-invertible operator. If A and B satisfy \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} (CAC,B )=0\), then A is called right \((m,C)\)-invertible ([2] ).
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) be commuting p-tuples of operators. By the same idea as in [17], we define the map \({\psi}_{{\mathbf{ A}}, {\mathbf{ B}}}:{\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}] \longrightarrow {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) by \(\psi _{{\mathbf{ A}}, {\mathbf{ B}}}(X)= \sum_{1 \leq j\leq m}B_{j}XA_{j}\). It is easy to check that
We set
The concept of an m-isometric p-tuple of operators was introduced by Gleason et al. in [17] as follows: A p-tuple of commuting operators \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) is called an m-isometric p-tuple if A satisfies \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} ( {\mathbf{ A}}^{*}, {\mathbf{ A}} ) =0\) for some positive integer m. However, the concept of an \((m, C)\)-isometric tuple was introduced by Sid Ahmed et al. in [27] as: A is called an \((m, C)\)-isometric p-tuple if \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} ( {\mathbf{ A}}^{*}, C{\mathbf{ A}}C ) =0\) for some positive integer m and a conjugation C.
Recall that the concepts of left m-invertible and right m-invertible p-tuples of operators was introduced and studied by the second named author in [26]. A p-tuple of commuting operators \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) is called a left m-invertible p-tuple if there exists a commuting p-tuple \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\) such that \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} ( {\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}} )=0\). However, if \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m} ( {\mathbf{ A}}, {\mathbf{ B}} )=0\), then A is called a right m-invertible p-tuple.
In continuation of these studies that have been carried out by many researchers, including our previous works in this field, our aim in this paper is to describe the class of left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuples of commuting operators, a generalization of the class of left \((m, C)\)-invertible of single operator on Hilbert spaces.
The outline of the paper is as follows. The second section is concerned with the main themes of the study. Namely, after several examples and interesting remarks, which try to clarify the context, we give some necessary, or even equivalent, conditions in order for a tuple of operators to be a left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple (Theorem 2.13). Section three contains the main results of the paper, namely Theorem 3.7, Theorem 3.9, and Theorem 3.11. In Theorem 3.7 we are interested if the perturbation of a left \((m, C)\)-invertible tuple of operators by a nilpotent tuple remains a \((r, C)\)-invertible p-tuple, where r depends on m and on the order of nilpotency. On the other hand, Theorem 3.9 proves that if A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\) is a left \((n, C)\)-invertible p-tuple, then \({\mathbf{ A}}*{\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\) is a left \((m + n - 1, C)\)-invertible p-tuple under suitable conditions. These results are used to obtain some properties on the tensor product of left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuples (Corollary 3.10 and Corollary 3.10 ). Theorem 3.11 proves that if A is a left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}= (\widetilde{A_{1}}, \ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}} )\) is such that each \(\widetilde{A_{k}}\) is a left \((n_{k}, C)\)-left invertible for \(k=1,\ldots ,p\), then \({\mathbf{ A}} \bullet {\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\) is a left \(( m+ \sum_{1\leq k\leq p}n_{k}-p, C)\)-invertible p-tuple.
2 Left \((m,C)\)-invertible tuple of commuting operators
This section is concerned with the same themes of the study. Namely, we give some properties and several examples and interesting remarks, which try to clarify the concept.
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ D}}=(D_{1},\ldots ,D_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting p-tuples of operators, we set
and
Definition 2.1
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a commuting p-tuple of operators. A is said to be a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple if there exists a p-tuple of commuting operators \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and a conjugation C on \({\mathcal {Y}}\) such that
or equivalently if \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}^{(l)} ({\mathbf{ B}}, { \mathbf{ A}} )=0\). However, \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\) is said to be a right-\((m,C)\)-invertible tuple if there exists a p-tuple of commuting operators \({\mathbf{ D}}=(D_{1},\ldots ,D_{p}) \in{\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and a conjugation C on \({\mathcal {Y} }\) such that
or equivalently if \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}^{(r)} ({\mathbf{ A}}, { \mathbf{ D}} )=0\).
Remark 2.2
(1) When \(p=1\) this definition coincides with the definition of a left \((m,C)\)-invertible for a single variable operator introduced in [2].
(2) Note that if \(A_{j}C=CA_{j}\) for all \(j=1,\ldots ,p\), then A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible operator p-tuple if and only if A is a left-m-invertible p-tuple.
Remark 2.3
(1) Since \(A_{i}A_{j}=A_{j}A_{i}\) for \(i,j \in \{1,\ldots ,p\}\) it is easy to see that every permutation of a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple is also a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple.
(2) For \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {H}}]^{p}\) such that \(A_{i}A_{j}=A_{j}A_{i}\) and \(B_{i}B_{j}=B_{j}B_{i}\) for \(i,j \in \{1,\ldots ,p\}\), we have
From the above identity, it follows that a p-tuple \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\) is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with conjugation C if and only if \(C{\mathbf{ A}}C:=(CA_{1}C,\ldots ,CA_{p}C)\) is a left-\((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with conjugation C.
We mention this relationship for commuting variables \(y=(y_{1},\ldots ,y_{p})\) . In particular, we have .
Remark 2.4
(1) For \(p=2\) and let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},A_{2}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {H}}]^{2}\) be a commuting pair of operators, then A is a left-\((1,C)\)-invertible pair for some conjugation C if
for some \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},B_{2}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {H}}]^{2}\). However, it is a left \((2, C)\)-invertible pair if
for some \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},B_{2}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{2}\).
(2) Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a commuting p-tuple of operators. A is a left \((1,C)\)-invertible p-tuple if and only if
and it is a left \((2,C)\)-invertible p-tuple if and only if
for some \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {H}}]^{p}\).
Example 2.5
Every \((m,C)\)-isometric p-tuple \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\) is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple and its adjoint \({\mathbf{ A}}^{*}\) is a right \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple.
Example 2.6
Let C be a conjugation on defined by \(C(z_{1},z_{2})=(\overline{z}_{2},\overline{z}_{1})\). Consider
Then, \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},A_{2})\) is a left-\((1,C)\)-invertible 2-tuple.
Indeed, observe that \(A_{1}A_{2}=A_{2}A_{1}\) and, moreover, consider
A direct calculation shows that and .
Using these equalities, we now have , and we are done.
Example 2.7
Let C be a conjugation on defined by \(Ce_{k}=e_{k}\), where \((e_{k})_{k}\) is an orthonormal basis. Define and by
It was explained in [7] that \(A_{1}\) is a \((2,C)\)-isometric operator and \(A_{2}\) is a \((m, C)\)-isometric operator. Let and .
By elementary calculation we show that A is a left \((2,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with conjugation C and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\) is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with conjugation C.
Example 2.8
Let C be a conjugation on \({\mathcal {Y}}\) and \(A\in \mathcal{B}_{b}[\mathcal{Y}]\) be a left \((m,C)\)-invertible operator. Then, the operator tuple \({\mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots,A_{p})\), where \(A_{j}=A\) for every \(j=1,\ldots ,p\), is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple of operators.
In fact, it is clear that \(A_{i}A_{j}=A_{j}A_{i}\) for all \(1\leq i;j\leq p\). Since A is left \((m,C)\)-invertible, then there exists \(B\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) such that .
Consider \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B,\ldots ,B)\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and applying the multinomial expansion, we obtain
Hence, \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}^{(l)} ({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}} )=0\) and therefore, B is a left-\((m,C)\)-inverse of A.
Remark 2.9
It should be noted that the question about left \((m,C)\)-invertibility for a p-tuple of commuting operators is nontrivial. There exists a p-tuple of commuting operators \({\mathbf{ A }}= (A_{1},\ldots , A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) such that each \(A_{j} \) is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible for all \(j = 1,\ldots ,p\), however, \({\mathbf{ A}} = (A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\) is not a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple. (We refer the reader to [27, Example 2.4].)
Lemma 2.10
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1}, \ldots , A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots , B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting p-tuples of operators. Then, the following identity holds
for all and where .
Proof
□
Proposition 2.11
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators and C be a conjugation on \({\mathcal {Y}}\).
(1) The maps \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}^{(l)}, {\mathbf{ Q}}_{m}^{(r)}:{\mathcal {B}}_{b}[ \mathcal {Y}]^{p}\times {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[\mathcal {Y}]^{p} \longrightarrow {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[\mathcal {Y}] \) satisfy the recursive relations
(2) If A is a left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple, then A is a left \((n,C)\)-invertible operator p-tuple for all \(n\geq m\).
(3) If A is a right \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple, then A is a right \((n,C)\)-invertible operator p-tuple for all \(n\geq m\).
Proof
(1) According to Eq. (2.1) and Lemma 2.10, we have
The statement in (2) follows immediately from (2.10). □
Proposition 2.12
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a commuting p-tuple and C be a conjugation operator on \({\mathcal {Y}}\).
(1) If A is a left \((2,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((2, C)\)-inverse p-tuple \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\), then the following identities hold
(2) If A is a right \((2,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with its right \((2, C)\)-inverse p-tuple \({\mathbf{ D}}=(D_{1},\ldots ,D_{p})\), then the following identities hold
Proof
(1) Eq. (2.12) is proved by induction. When \(n=0\) or \(n=1\) the statement is trivially true. Assume that the statement is true for some integer n and prove it for \(n+1\). Indeed, according to Lemma 2.10, we have
From the induction hypothesis, we have
Since A is a left \((2,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((2, C)\) inverse B, we have by (2.8)
This shows the claim is true in the case of \(n+1\). The identity (2.13) follows from the first one by taking \(n\rightarrow \infty \).
The results and techniques for proving (2.14) and (2.15) are very similar. □
Theorem 2.13
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in \mathcal{B}_{b}[\mathcal{Y}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in \mathcal{B}_{b}[\mathcal{Y}]^{p}\) be commuting p-tuples of operators. The following statements hold
(i)
for every .
(ii) A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple if and only if there exists a p-tuple of operators \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in \mathcal{B}_{b}[\mathcal{Y}]^{p}\) such that
(iii) If A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((2, C)\)-inverse , then
Proof
(i) Observe that when \(n=0\) or \(n=1\) the identity (2.16) is valued. Assume the statement (2.16) is true for n. We shall deduce it at step \(n+1\). By virtue of (2.1) and (2.16) we obtain
This shows the claim is true in the case of n + 1.
(ii) If we assume that A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((m,C)\)-inverse p-tuple B, then \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{q}^{(l)}({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}})=0\) for all \(q\geq m\) (by Proposition 2.11). Therefore, (2.17) follows from (2.16).
On the other hand, if (2.17) holds for all \(n\geq 1\), then \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{q}^{(l)}({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}})=0\) for \(q\geq m\) by (2.16). Therefore, A is a left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple.
(iii) By (2.16) if A is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple, we obtain
and moreover,
By taking \(n\to \infty \) we obtain the desired result. □
3 Perturbation, product, and tensor product
This section is devoted to the study of some questions related to the perturbation, product and tensor product of a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple of operators. In order to examine these questions we introduce the following powerful lemmas.
Lemma 3.1
Let , and be such that \(| \mu | + k = n+1\). For \(1 \leq r \leq p\), let . Then,
where .
Proof
The proof is similar to the proof of [12, Lemma 2.3], hence we omit it. □
Lemma 3.2
Let \({ \mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({ \mathbf{B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({ \mathbf{N}}=(N_{1},\ldots , N_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples operators such that \([B_{j}, N_{k}]=0\) for all \((j, k)\in \{1,\ldots ,p\}^{2}\). Then, the following identities hold:
Proof
We prove the identity (3.2) by induction on n. When \(n=1\), we have
Assume that (3.2) holds for n. According to Proposition 2.11, it holds that
□
Remark 3.3
When \(p=1\), Lemma 3.2 coincides with [18, Lemma 1].
Let \({ \mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\). We set
Lemma 3.4
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}=\widetilde{(A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}})\in {\mathbf{ B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{B}}}=(\widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators such that
then
Proof
For \(n=1\) we have,
Assume that (3.4) is true for n and prove it for \(n+1\). In fact, from Proposition 2.11, we have
Under the assumptions \([B_{j}, \widetilde{B_{r}}]=[A_{j}, \widetilde{A_{r}}]= [ \widetilde{B_{j}}, C{A_{r}}C]=0\) for all \(j,r \in \{1,\ldots ,p\}\), we obtain
By observing that
□
Remark 3.5
When \(p=1\), Lemma 3.4 coincides with [18, Lemma 12].
For \({ \mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathbf{ B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({ \mathbf{B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathbf{ B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), we set
Lemma 3.6
Let \({ \mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({ \mathbf{B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}=\widetilde{(A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}})\in {\mathbf{ B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{B}}}=(\widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators such that
then
for all .
Proof
We will prove (3.6) by mathematical induction. For \(n=1\), we have
Therefore, by Proposition 2.11, we obtain that
Hence, (3.6) is true for \(n=1\). Assume it is true for n and prove it for \(n+1\).
Following the conditions
and Proposition 2.11 we obtain
On the other hand,
Hence, we obtain this result. □
Let \({ \mathbf{N}}=(N_{1},\ldots ,N_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a commuting p-tuple, we say that N is q-nilpotent if \({ \mathbf{N}}^{\mu}=N_{1}^{\mu _{1}}...N_{p}^{\mu _{p}}=0\) for all with \(\mu _{1}+\cdots +\mu _{p}=q\) ([19] ).
Theorem 3.7
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({\mathbf{ N}}=(N_{1},\ldots , N_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators. Assume that \([B_{k}, N_{j}]=0\) for all \((k, j)\in \{ 1,\ldots ,p\}^{2}\) and N is a nilpotent tuple of order q. If B is a left \((m,C)\)-inverse of A, then \({\mathbf{ B+N}}=(B_{1}+N_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}+N_{p})\) is a left \((m+q-1, C)\)-inverse of A.
Proof
According to Lemma 3.2, we have
If \(\vert \mu \vert \geq q\), then \({\mathbf{ N}}^{\mu}=0\). If \(\vert \mu \vert \leq q-1\), then \(k\geq m\) and, hence, \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{k}^{(l)}({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}})=0\).
Hence, \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m+q-1}^{(l)}({\mathbf{ B}} + {\mathbf{ N}}, {\mathbf{ A}})=0\) and therefore, \({\mathbf{ B+N}}\) is a left-\((m+q-1, C)\)-inverse of A. □
For \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) and \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p}) \in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\). Set
the tensor product of A and B. It should be noted that the following corollary is an interesting consequence of Theorem 3.7.
Corollary 3.8
Let \({ \mathbf{A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]\) be a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple of commuting operators with its left \((m, C)\)-inverse \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\) and let \({\mathbf{ N}}=(N_{1},\ldots ,N_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a q-nilpotent p-tuple of commuting operators. Then,
is a left \((m+q-1,C\otimes C)\)-inverse p-tuple.
Proof
By observing that \((B_{j}\otimes I)( I\otimes N_{k})=(I\otimes N_{k})(B_{j}\otimes I)\) for all \(j,k\in \{1,\ldots ,p\}\) and moreover \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes {\mathbf{ I}}\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {H}} \overline{\otimes}{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) is a left \((m,C\otimes C)\)-inverse p-tuple of \({\mathbf{ A}}\otimes {\mathbf{ I}}\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {H}} \overline{\otimes}{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\). \({\mathbf{ I}}\otimes {\mathbf{ N}}\in {\mathcal {B}}_{p}[{\mathcal {Y}} \overline{\otimes}{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) is a nilpotent p-tuple of order q. Hence, \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes {\mathbf{ I}}\) and \({\mathbf{ I}} \otimes {\mathbf{ N}}\) satisfy the conditions of Theorem 3.7. Therefore, \({\mathbf{ B \otimes}}{\mathbf{ I}}+{\mathbf{ I}}\otimes {\mathbf{ N}}\) is a left \((m+q-1, C\otimes C)\)-inverse p-tuple. □
Theorem 3.9
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}=\widetilde{(A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{B}}}=(\widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators such that
If B is a left \((m, C)\)-inverse of A and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}\) is a left \((n, C)\)-inverse of \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\), then \({\mathbf{ B}}*{\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}\) is a \((m+n-1, C)\)-left inverse of \({\mathbf{ A}}*{\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\).
Proof
In view of Lemma 3.4, we have
If \(k\geq m \), then \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{k}^{(l)} ({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}} )=0\) and if \(k< m\) then \(m+n-1-k> n-1\) and so
Therefore, \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{m+n-1}^{(l)} ({ \mathbf{B}}*{ \mathbf{\widetilde{B}}}, { \mathbf{A}}*{ \mathbf{\widetilde{ A}}} )=0\). □
Corollary 3.10
Let \({\mathcal {A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{ \mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a left \((m, C)\)-invertible p-tuple and \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}=(\widetilde{A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}})\in {\mathcal{B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be a left \((n, D)\)-invertible k-tuple. If \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\) is a left \((m, C)\)-inverse p-tuple of A and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}=(\widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}})\) is a left \((n, D)\)-inverse p-tuple of \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\). Then,
is a left \((m+n-1,C\otimes D)\)-invertible \(p^{2}\)-tuple with its left \((m+n-1,C\otimes C )\)-inverse \(p^{2}\)-tuple
where C and D are conjugations on \({\mathcal {Y}}\), respectively.
Proof
Since \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\) is a left \((m,C)\)-invertible p-tuple and \({ \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}= (\widetilde{A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}} )\) is a left \((n, D)\)-isometric tuple of operators, it follows that \({\mathbf{ A}}\otimes{\mathbf{ I}} = (A_{1}\otimes I,\ldots ,A_{p} \otimes I )\) is a left \((m, C\otimes D)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((m, C)\)-inverse p-tuple \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes {\mathbf{ I}}= ( B_{1}\otimes I_{1}, \ldots , B_{p}\otimes I )\) and \({\mathbf{ I}}\otimes{\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}} =(I\otimes \widetilde{A_{1},}\cdots ,I\otimes \widetilde{A_{p}} )\) is a left \((n,C\otimes D)\)-invertible p-tuple with its left \((n, C\otimes D)\)-inverse p-tuple \({\mathbf{ I}}\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}= (I\otimes \widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots ,I\otimes {\widetilde{{B_{p}}}} )\)-p- tuple. However,
for \(1\leq j\leq p\) and \({1\leq r\leq p}\).
Since
where
and
where
According to Theorem 3.9 we deduce that \({\mathbf{ A}} {\otimes}^{*} { \mathbf{\widetilde{A}}}\) is a left \((m+n-1, C\otimes D)\) invertible \(p^{2}\)-tuple with its left \((m+n-1,C\otimes D)\)-inverse \(p^{2}\)-tuple \({\mathbf{ B}} {\otimes}^{*} { \mathbf{\widetilde{ B}}}\). □
Theorem 3.11
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}=(A_{1},\ldots ,A_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\mathbf{ B}}=(B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}=\widetilde{(A_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{A_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\), and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}=(\widetilde{B_{1}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}})\in {\mathcal {B}}_{b}[{\mathcal {Y}}]^{p}\) be commuting tuples of operators that satisfy the following conditions
If B is a left \((m,C)\)-inverse of A and \({\widetilde{B_{k}}}\) is a left \((n_{k},C)\)-inverse of \(\widetilde{A_{k}}\) for \(k=1,\ldots ,p\), then \({ \mathbf{B}}\bullet{ \mathbf{\widetilde{B}}}\) is a left \((m+ \sum_{1\leq k\leq p}n_{k}-p, C )\)-inverse of \({\mathbf{ A}}\bullet{\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}\).
Proof
Set \(d=m+n-p\), where \(n=n_{1}+\cdots + n_{p}\). According to Lemma 3.6, we have
When \(k\in \{0,\ldots , n-p\}\) we have \(d-k\geq m\) and therefore \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{d-k}^{(l)} ({\mathbf{ B}}, {\mathbf{ A}} )=0\).
When \(k> n-p\) and \(\vert \mu \vert = k\), then there exists \(i_{0}\in \{1,\ldots , p \}\) such that \(\mu _{i_{0}} \geq n_{i_{0}} \) and, hence, \({\mathbf{ Q}}_{\mu _{i_{0}}}^{(l)} ( \widetilde{B_{i_{0}} }, \widetilde{A_{i_{0}}} )=0\). □
The following Corollary is a useful application of Theorem 3.11.
Corollary 3.12
Let \({\mathbf{ A}}= (A_{1},\ldots , A_{p} )\), \({\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}= ( \widetilde{A_{1}},\ldots ,\widetilde{A_{p}} )\), \({\mathbf{ B}}= (B_{1},\ldots ,B_{p} )\) and \({\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}= ( {\widetilde{B_{1}}},\ldots , \widetilde{B_{p}} )\) be commuting p-tuples of operators. Assume that B is a left \((m,C)\)-inverse p-tuple of A and \(\widetilde{{B_{k}}}\) is a left \((n_{k}, C)\)-inverse of \(\widetilde{A_{k}}\) for \(k=1,\ldots ,p\). Then, \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}= (B_{1}\otimes \widetilde{B_{1}}, \ldots , B_{p}\otimes \widetilde{B_{p}} )\) is a left \((m+ \sum_{1\leq k\leq p}n_{k}-p, C\otimes C )\)-inverse p-tuple of \({\mathbf{ A}}\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}= (A_{1}\otimes \widetilde{A_{1}}, \ldots , A_{p}\otimes \widetilde{A_{p}} )\).
Proof
We will use the elementary identities,
and similarly
Since B is a left \((m,C)\)-inverse p-tuple of A and \(\widetilde{B_{k}}\) is a left \((n_{k},C)\)-inverse of \(\widetilde{A_{k}}\) for \(k=1,\ldots ,p\), it is easily seen that \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes I\) is a left \((m,C\otimes C)\)-left inverse p-tuple of \({\mathbf{ A}}\otimes I\) and \(I\otimes \widetilde{B_{k} }\) is a left \((n_{k}, C\otimes C)\)-left inverse of \(I \otimes \widetilde{A_{k}}\) for each \(k=1,\ldots ,p\).
In addition, it is obvious that
for all \(j,r \in \{1,\ldots ,p\}\). By applying Theorem 3.11 we deduce that \({\mathbf{ B}}\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}}= ( {\mathbf{ B}} \otimes I ) \bullet (I\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{B}}} )\) is a left \(( m+ \sum_{1\leq k\leq p}n_{k}-p, C\otimes C )\)-inverse p-tuple of \({\mathbf{ A}}\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}}= ( {\mathbf{ A}} \otimes I ) \bullet (I\otimes {\widetilde{\mathbf{A}}} )\). The proof is achieved. □
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this paper.
References
Agler, J., Stankus, M.: m-Isometric transformations of Hilbert space I. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 21, 383–429 (1995)
Al-Dohiman, A.A., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: On \((m,C)\)-invertible operators and related operators-I-. (Review)
Athavale, A.: On joint hyponormality of operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 103(2), 417–423 (1988)
Baklouti, H., Feki, K., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: Joint numerical ranges of operators in semi-Hilbertian spaces. Linear Algebra Appl. 555, 266–284 (2018)
Baklouti, H., Feki, K., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: Joint normality of operators in semi-Hilbertian spaces. Linear Multilinear Algebra 68(4), 845–866 (2020)
Chō, M., Jeon, I.H., Lee, J.I.: Joint spectra of doubly commuting n-tuples of operators and their Aluthge transforms. Nihonkai Math. J. 11(1), 87–96 (2000)
Chō, M., Ko, E., Lee, J.: On \((m, C)\)-isometric operators. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 10, 1679–1694 (2016)
Chõ, M., Ko, E., Lee, J.E.: \((\infty,C)\)-isometric operators. Oper. Matrices 11(3), 793–806 (2017)
Chõ, M., Lee, J.E., Motoyoshi, H.: On \([m, C]\)-isometric operators. Filomat 31(7), 2073–2080 (2017)
Chō, M., Müller, V.: Spectral commutativity of multioperators. Funct. Anal. Approx. Comput. 4(1), 21–25 (2012)
Chõ, M., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: \((A, m)\)-symmetric commuting tuples of operators on a Hilbert space. Math. Inequal. Appl. 22(3), 931–947 (2019)
Chõ, M., Ould Beiba, E.M., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: \((n_{1},\ldots , n_{p}) \)-quasi-m-isometric commuting tuple of operators on a Hilbert space. Ann. Funct. Anal. 12(1), 4 (2021)
Duggal, B.P., Kim, I.H.: Structure of n-quasi left-m-invertible and related classes of operators. Demonstr. Math. 53, 249–268 (2020)
Duggal, B.P., Kim, I.H.: Structure of elementary operators defining m-left invertible, m-selfadjoint and related classes of operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 495(1), 124718 (2021)
Duggal, B.P., Muller, V.: Tensor product of left n-invertible operators. Stud. Math. 215(2), 113–125 (2013)
Garcia, S.R., Prodan, E., Putinar, M.: Mathematical and physical aspects of complex symmetric operators. J. Phys. A 47, 353001 (2014)
Gleason, J., Richter, S.: m-Isometric commuting tuples of operators on a Hilbert space. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 56(2), 181–196 (2006)
Gu, C.: Structures of left n-invertible operators and their applications. Stud. Math. 226(3), 189–211 (2015)
Gu, C.: Examples of m-isometric tuples of operators on a Hilbert space. J. Korean Math. Soc. 55(1), 225–251 (2018)
Hedayarian, K., Moghaddam, A.: Some properties of the spherical m-isometries. J. Oper. Theory 79(1), 55–77 (2018)
Hoffmann, P.H.W., Mackey, M.: \((m, p)\) and \((m,\infty )\)-isometric operator tuples on normed spaces. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 8(2), 1550022 (2015)
Mecheri, S., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: Classes of operators related to m-isometric operators. Operators and Matrices (2018). arXiv:1812.05722
Mecheri, S., Prasad, T.: On n-quasi-m-isometric operators. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 9(4), 1650073 (2016)
Messaoud, G., Ould Beiba, E.M., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: Joint A-hyponormality of operators in semi-Hilbert spaces. Linear Multilinear Algebra 69(15), 2888–2907 (2021)
Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: Some properties of m-isometries and m-invertible operators in Banach spaces. Acta Math. Sci. 32B(2), 520–530 (2012)
Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A.: On the joint class of \((m, q)\)-partial isometries and the joint m-invertuble tuples of commuting operators on a Hilbert space. Ital. J. Pure Appl. Math. 40, 438–463 (2018)
Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A., Chō, M. Lee, J.E.: On \((m,C)\)-isometric commuting tuples of operators on a Hilbert space. Results Math. 73(51), 1–31 (2018)
Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A., Chō, M., Lee, J.E.: On n-quasi-\((m, C)\)-isometric operators. Linear Multilinear Algebra 68(5), 1001–1020 (2020)
Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A., Saddi, A., Gherairi, K.: Some results on higher orders quasi-isometries. Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 49(4), 1315–1333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.532964
Shen, J.: On n-quasi-\([m, C]\)-isometric operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019(1), 1 (2019)
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University for funding this work through research grant No (DSR2020-05-2547). The authors are extremely grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which have helped improve the quality of our manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Jouf University through research grant No (DSR2020-05-2547).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AA and SM contributed their efforts jointly to this manuscript. In summary, AA initiated the investigation, proposed some preliminary ideas, and conducted some detailed investigations. SM analyzed the proposed ideas, made some calculations, and gave many comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Al Dohiman, A.A., Ould Ahmed Mahmoud, S.A. Class of operators related to a \((m,C)\)-isometric tuple of commuting operators. J Inequal Appl 2022, 105 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02835-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02835-8