Skip to main content

Higher order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators


In this paper, we define new higher order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators, we give some approximation properties of these operators in terms of various moduli of continuity. We prove a local approximation theorem, a Korovkin-type theorem, and a Voronovskaja-type theorem. We also prove weighted approximation theorems for these new operators.

1 Introduction and auxiliary results

The well-known Bernstein polynomials belonging to a function \(f(x)\) defined on the interval \([ 0,1 ] \) are defined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} B_{n}(f;x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n}f \biggl( \frac{k}{n} \biggr) \begin{pmatrix} n \\ k \end{pmatrix} x^{k}(1-x)^{n-k}\quad (n=1,2,\ldots). \end{aligned}$$

If \(f(x)\) is continuous on \([ 0,1 ] \), the polynomials converge uniformly to \(f(x)\). These polynomials have an important role in approximation theory and also in other fields of mathematics.

In 1950, for \(f\in C[0,\infty )\), Szász [23] defined the operators

$$\begin{aligned} &S_{n} ( f;x ) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}p_{n,k}(x)f \biggl( \frac {k}{n} \biggr),\quad x\in {}[ 0,\infty ), n=1,2,\ldots, \\ &\quad\text{where }p_{n,k}(x) =e^{-nx}\frac{(nx)^{k}}{k!}. \end{aligned}$$

In [5], Dubey and Jain proposed the integral modification of the Szász–Mirakjan operators to approximate integrable functions on the interval \([0,\infty ]\), and in [9], Gupta and Sinha studied some direct results on certain Szász–Mirakjan operators. Some related problems were considered by many authors, see for example [1, 2, 5, 10, 1323] and the references therein.

An operator \(L:C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1]\) is said to be convex of order \(l-1\) if it preserves convexity of order \(l-1\), \(l\in \mathbb{N} \), where \(\mathbb{N} \) is the set of natural numbers. The classical Bernstein operator is an example of a mapping convex of all orders \(l-1\), \(l\in \mathbb{N} \). For an operator L being convex of order \(l-1\), consider

$$\begin{aligned} I_{l}:C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1] \end{aligned}$$

given by

$$\begin{aligned} &I_{l}f =f,\quad \text{if }l=0, \\ &(I_{l}f) (x) = \int _{0}^{x}\frac{(x-t)^{l-1}}{(l-1)!}f(t)\,dt,\quad \text{if }l\geq 1. \end{aligned}$$

Suppose that \(L(C^{l}[0,1])\subset C^{l}[0,1]\). Let

$$\begin{aligned} Q^{l}:=D^{l}\circ L\circ I_{l},\quad \text{where }D^{l}= \frac{d^{l}}{dx^{l}}. \end{aligned}$$

\(Q^{l}\) may be considered as an lth order Kantorovich modification of L. The construction of positive operators \(Q^{l}\), \(l\geq 0\), is most useful in simultaneous approximation where for appropriate mappings L the difference

$$\begin{aligned} D^{l}Lf-D^{l}f \end{aligned}$$

is considered (see [6, 7, 11]).

On the other hand, we know that Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators can be defined as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n} ( f;x ) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}e^{-nx} \frac{(nx)^{k}}{k!} \int _{0}^{1}f \biggl( \frac{k+t}{n} \biggr) \,dt. \end{aligned}$$

By using the lth order integral and the above definition of the Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators, we define a new lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operator as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l} ( f;x ) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}p_{n,k}(x) \int _{0}^{1}\cdots \int _{0}^{1}f \biggl( \frac{k+t_{1}+\cdots+t_{l}}{n+l} \biggr) \,dt_{1}\cdots dt_{l}, \end{aligned}$$

where \(p_{n,k}(x)=e^{-nx}\frac{(nx)^{k}}{k!}\), \(n\in \mathbb{N} \), \(x\geq 0\), f is a real-valued continuous function defined on \([ 0,\infty ) \).

The paper is organized as follows. In the preliminaries section we give some known results and we derive a recurrence formula for the lth order Szász–Mirakjan–Kantorovich operators \(K_{n}^{l} ( f;x ) \). With the help of the derived recurrence formula, we calculate the moments \(K_{n}^{l} ( t^{m};x ) \) for \(m=0,1,2,3,4\) and we calculate the central moments \(K_{n}^{l} ( (t-x)^{m};x ) \) for some m. In Sect. 3, we prove a local approximation theorem, a Korovkin-type approximation theorem, and a Voronovskaja-type theorem. We obtain the rate of convergence of these types of operators for Lipschitz-type maximal functions, second order modulus of smoothness and Peetre’s K-functional. In Sect. 4, we investigate weighted approximation properties of the lth order Szász–Mirakjan–Kantorovich operators in terms of the modulus of continuity.

2 Preliminaries

We consider the following class of functions.

Let \(C_{B} [ 0,\infty ) \) be the space of all real-valued continuous bounded functions f on \([0,\infty )\), endowed with the norm \(\Vert f \Vert = \sup_{x\in [ 0,\infty ) } \vert f(x) \vert \).

$$\begin{aligned} C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty ):= \bigl\{ g\in C_{B}[0, \infty ):g^{\prime},g^{ \prime \prime }\in C_{B}[0,\infty ) \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$

Let \(B_{m} [ 0,\infty ) \) be the set of all functions f satisfying the condition that \(\vert f(x) \vert \leq M_{f}(1+x^{m})\), \(x\in [ 0,\infty ) \) with some constant \(M_{f}\) depending on f. Introduce

$$\begin{aligned} &C_{m} [ 0,\infty ) = \biggl\{ f\in B_{m} [ 0, \infty ) \cap C [ 0,\infty ): \Vert f \Vert _{m}:=\sup_{x\in [ 0,\infty ) } \frac{ \vert f(x) \vert }{1+x^{m}}< \infty \biggr\} , \\ &C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) = \biggl\{ f\in C_{m} [ 0, \infty ):\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{ \vert f(x) \vert }{1+x^{m}}< \infty \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$

In the following lemma we give the moments of the Szász operator up to the fourth order.

Lemma 1


We have

$$\begin{aligned} &S_{n}(1,x) =1, \\ &S_{n}(t,x) =x, \\ &S_{n}\bigl(t^{2},x\bigr) =x^{2}+ \frac{x}{n}, \\ &S_{n}\bigl(t^{3},x\bigr) =x^{3}+ \frac{3}{n}x^{2}+\frac{1}{n^{2}}x, \\ &S_{n}\bigl(t^{4},x\bigr) =x^{4}+ \frac{6}{n}x^{3}+\frac{7}{n^{2}}x^{2}+ \frac{1}{n^{3}}x. \end{aligned}$$

In the following lemma we derive a recurrence formula for \(K_{n}^{l} ( t^{m};x ) \) which will be used to calculate moments of the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators.

Lemma 2

For all \(n\in \mathbb{N} \), x \([ 0,\infty ) \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{m};x \bigr) =\sum _{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)}S_{n} \bigl( t^{j_{0}},x \bigr), \end{aligned}$$

where \(S_{n} ( f,x ) \) is the Szász–Mirakjan operator defined in [23].


We can obtain the recurrence formula with the help of the following equality:

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl( \frac{k+t_{1}+\cdots+t_{l}}{n+l} \biggr) ^{m}={}&\sum _{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{k^{j_{0}}t_{1}^{j_{1}}\cdots t_{l}^{j_{l}}}{(n+l)^{m}}\int _{0}^{1}\cdots \int _{0}^{1} \frac{k^{j_{0}}t_{1}^{j_{1}}\cdots t_{l}^{j_{l}}}{(n+l)^{m}} \,dt_{1}\cdots dt_{l}\\ = {}&\frac{k^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)}. \end{aligned}$$

Now by direct calculation we write

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{m};x \bigr) & =\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}p_{n,k} ( x ) \int _{0}^{1}\cdots \int _{0}^{1}f \biggl( \frac {k+t_{1}+\cdots+t_{l}}{n+l} \biggr) ^{m}\,dt_{1}\cdots dt_{l} \\ & =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}p_{n,k} ( x ) \sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \int _{0}^{1}\cdots \int _{0}^{1} \frac{k^{j_{0}}t_{1}^{j_{1}}\cdots t_{l}^{j_{l}}}{(n+l)^{m}}^{m} \,dt_{1}\cdots dt_{l} \\ & =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}p_{n,k} ( x ) \sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{k^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)} \,dt_{1}\cdots dt_{l} \\ & =\sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{k^{j_{0}}}{n^{j_{0}}}p_{n,k} ( x ) \\ & =\sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \begin{pmatrix} m \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)}S_{n}\bigl(t^{j_{0}},x\bigr), \end{aligned}$$

where \(S_{n}(f,x)\) is the Szász–Mirakjan operator. □

Moments and central moments play an important role in approximation theory. In the following lemma we give explicit formulas for the mth (\(m=0,1,2,3,4\),) order moments of the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators \(K_{n}^{l} ( f;x ) \).

Lemma 3

For all \(n\in \mathbb{N} \) and \(x\in {}[ 0,\infty )\), we have the following equalities:

$$\begin{aligned} &K_{n}^{l} ( 1;x ) =1, \\ &K_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) =\frac{n}{n+l}x+\frac{l}{2(n+l)}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{2}x^{2}+ \frac {n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac {l(3l+1)}{12(n+l)^{2}}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{3};x \bigr) = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{3}x^{3}+ \frac{3n^{2}l+6n^{2}}{2(n+l)^{3}}x^{2}+ \frac{3nl^{2}+7nl+4n}{4(n+l)^{3}}x+\frac{l^{3}-l^{2}+2l}{8(n+l)^{3}}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{4};x \bigr) = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{4}x^{4}+ \frac{2n^{3}l+6n^{3}}{(n+l)^{4}}x^{3}+ \frac{3n^{2}l^{2}+13n^{2}l+14n^{2}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x^{2} \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{4};x \bigr) =}{} +\frac{nl^{3}+2nl^{2}+7nl+2n}{2(n+l)^{4}}x+ \frac{15l^{4}-50l^{3}+185l^{2}-102l}{240(n+l)^{4}}. \end{aligned}$$


The proof is done by using the recurrence formula given in Lemma 2.

$$\begin{aligned} &K_{n}^{l} ( 1;x ) \quad\text{is obvious. }\\ &K_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) =\sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=1} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)}S_{n}\bigl(t^{j_{0}},x \bigr) \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) } = \begin{pmatrix} l \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2(n+l)}+\frac{n}{n+l}x, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) =\sum _{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=2} \begin{pmatrix} 2 \\ j_{0},\ldots,j_{l}\end{pmatrix} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{2}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)}S_{n} \bigl(t^{j_{0}},x\bigr) \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) } = \begin{pmatrix} l \\ 2 \end{pmatrix} \frac{2}{4(n+l)^{2}}+ \begin{pmatrix} l \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \frac{1}{3(n+l)^{2}}+ \begin{pmatrix} l \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \frac{n}{(n+l)^{2}}x+ \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{2}\biggl(x^{2}+ \frac{x}{n}\biggr) \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) } = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{2}x^{2}+ \frac{n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac{l(3l+1)}{12(n+l)^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$

\(K_{n}^{l} ( t^{3};x ) \) and \(K_{n}^{l} ( t^{4};x ) \) can be done in a similar way. □

In the following lemma we give formulas for the mth order central moments of the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators for \(m=1,2,4\).

Lemma 4

For all \(n\in \mathbb{N} \), we have the following central moments:

$$\begin{aligned} &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x);x \bigr) =\frac{l(1-2x)}{2(n+l)}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) = \frac{l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}+\frac{n-l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{4};x \bigr) = \biggl( \frac{l}{n+l} \biggr) ^{4}x^{4}+ \frac{6nl^{2}+2l^{4}}{(n+l)^{4}}x^{3}+ \frac{-12nl^{2}+6n^{2}-8nl+3l^{4}+l^{3}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x^{2} \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{4};x \bigr)=}{} +\frac{3nl^{2}+5nl+2n-l^{4}+l^{3}-2l^{2}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x+ \frac{15l^{4}-50l^{3}+185l^{2}-102l}{240(n+l)^{4}}. \end{aligned}$$


The proof is done by using Lemma 3 and the linearity of the operators.

$$\begin{aligned} &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x);x \bigr) =K_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) -x= \frac {n}{n+l}x+\frac{l}{2(n+l)}-x=\frac{l(1-2x)}{2(n+l)}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) =K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) -2xK_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) +x^{2} \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) } = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{2}x^{2}+ \frac {n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac {l(3l+1)}{12(n+l)^{2}}-2x \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l}x+ \frac{l}{2(n+l)} \biggr) +x^{2} \\ &\phantom{K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) } =\frac{l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}+\frac{n-l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}, \\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{4};x \bigr) \\ &\quad=K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{4};x \bigr) -4xK_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{3};x \bigr) +6x^{2}K_{n}^{l} \bigl( t^{2};x \bigr) -4x^{3}K_{n}^{l} ( t;x ) +x^{4} \\ &\quad = \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{4}x^{4}+ \frac{2n^{3}l+6n^{3}}{(n+l)^{4}}x^{3}+\frac{3n^{2}l^{2}+13n^{2}l+14n^{2}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x^{2} \\ &\qquad{} +\frac{nl^{3}+2nl^{2}+7nl+2n}{2(n+l)^{4}}x+ \frac{15l^{4}-50l^{3}+185l^{2}-102l}{240(n+l)^{4}} \\ &\qquad{} -4x \biggl( \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{3}x^{3}+ \frac{3n^{2}l+6n^{2}}{2(n+l)^{3}}x^{2}+\frac{3nl^{2}+7nl+4n}{4(n+l)^{3}}x+ \frac{l^{3}-l^{2}+2l}{8(n+l)^{3}} \biggr) \\ &\qquad{}+6x^{2} \biggl( \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l} \biggr) ^{2}x^{2}+ \frac {n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac {l(3l+1)}{12(n+l)^{2}} \biggr) -4x^{3} \biggl( \frac{n}{n+l}x+\frac{l}{2(n+l)} \biggr) +x^{4} \\ &\quad = \biggl( \frac{l}{n+l} \biggr) ^{4}x^{4}+ \frac{6nl^{2}+2l^{4}}{(n+l)^{4}}x^{3}+\frac{-12nl^{2}+6n^{2}-8nl+3l^{4}+l^{3}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x^{2} \\ &\qquad{} +\frac{3nl^{2}+5nl+2n-l^{4}+l^{3}-2l^{2}}{2(n+l)^{4}}x+ \frac{15l^{4}-50l^{3}+185l^{2}-102l}{240(n+l)^{4}}. \end{aligned}$$


One of the main problems in approximation theory is to estimate the rate of convergence for sequences of positive linear operators. Voronovskaja-type formulas are one of the most important tools for studying their asymptotic behavior. In the following lemma we give two limits that later will be used to prove Voronovskaja-type theorem for the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators.

Lemma 5

For \(x\in {}[ 0,\infty )\) and \(n\rightarrow \infty \), we have the following limits:

$$\begin{aligned} &\mathit{(i)}\quad\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l} ( t-x;x ) = \frac {l(1-2x)}{2}, \\ &\mathit{(ii)}\quad\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l} \bigl( ( t-x ) ^{2};x \bigr) =x. \end{aligned}$$


The proof is trivial with the use of the formulas \(K_{n}^{l} ( t-x;x ) \) and \(K_{n}^{l} ( (t-x)^{2};x ) \) given in Lemma 3,

$$\begin{aligned} &\mathit{(i)}\quad\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l} ( t-x;x ) = \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac{nl(1-2x)}{2(n+l)}= \frac {l(1-2x)}{2}, \\ &\mathit{(ii)}\quad\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l} \bigl( ( t-x ) ^{2};x \bigr) =\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \biggl\{ \frac{nl^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}+ \frac{n^{2}-nl^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac{3nl^{2}+nl}{12(n+l)^{2}}\biggr\} \\ &\phantom{\mathit{(ii)}\quad\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l} \bigl( ( t-x ) ^{2};x \bigr) } =x. \end{aligned}$$


3 Local approximation

In this section, we establish local approximation theorem for the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators. We consider the Peetre’s K-functional

$$\begin{aligned} K_{2}(f,\delta ):=\inf \bigl\{ \Vert f-g \Vert +\delta \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert :g\in C_{B}^{2}[0, \infty ) \bigr\} ,\quad \delta \geq 0. \end{aligned}$$

Then from the known result in [4], there exists an absolute constant \(C>0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} K_{2}(f,\delta )\leq C\omega _{2}(f,\sqrt{\delta}), \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} \omega _{2}(f,\sqrt{\delta}):=\sup_{0< h\leq \sqrt{\delta}}\sup _{x \pm h\in {}[ 0,\infty )} \bigl\vert f(x-h)-2f(x)+f(x+h) \bigr\vert \end{aligned}$$

is the second modulus of smoothness of \(f\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\).

In the following theorem we state the first main result for the local approximation of our operators \(K_{n}^{l}(f;x)\).

Theorem 6

There exists an absolute constant \(C>0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq C\omega _{2}\bigl(f,\sqrt{ \delta _{n}(x)}\bigr)+\omega \bigl( f, \theta _{n}(x) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} &f \in C_{B}[0,\infty ], \quad\delta _{n}(x)=K_{n}^{l} \bigl((t-x)^{2};x\bigr)+ \bigl( K_{n}^{l} \bigl((t-x);x\bigr) \bigr) ^{2}\\ &\phantom{f \in C_{B}[0,\infty ], \quad\delta _{n}(x)}=\frac{6l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{n-2l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac{2l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}, \\ &\theta _{n}(x) = \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l} \bigl((t-x);x\bigr) \bigr\vert = \biggl\vert \frac{l(1-2x)}{2(n+l)} \biggr\vert ,\quad 0\leq x< \infty. \end{aligned}$$



$$\begin{aligned} \widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(f;x)=K_{n}^{l}(f;x)+f(x)-f \bigl( \mu _{n}(x) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$

where \(f\in C_{B}[0,\infty ]\), \(\mu _{n}(x)=K_{n}^{l}((t-x);x)+x=\frac {l+2nx}{2(n+l)}\). Note that \(\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}((t-x);x)=0\). By using Taylor’s formula, we have

$$\begin{aligned} g(t)=g(x)+g^{\prime}(x) (t-x)+ \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds,\quad g\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty ). \end{aligned}$$

Applying \(\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}\) to both sides of the above equation, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(g;x)-g(x) \\ &\quad =\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l} \bigl((t-x)g^{ \prime }(x);x\bigr)+\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l} \biggl( \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{ \prime \prime }(s)\,ds;x \biggr) \\ &\quad =g^{\prime}(x)\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}\bigl((t-x);x \bigr)+K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{\prime \prime}(s) \,ds;x \biggr) - \int _{x}^{\mu _{n}(x)} \bigl( \mu _{n}(x)-s \bigr) g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds \\ &\quad =K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds;x \biggr) - \int _{x}^{\mu _{n}(x)} \bigl( \mu _{n}(x)-s \bigr) g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds. \end{aligned}$$

On the other hand,

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds \biggr\vert \leq \int _{x}^{t}(t-s) \bigl\vert g^{\prime \prime}(s) \bigr\vert \,ds\leq \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)\,ds\leq \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime } \bigr\Vert (t-s)^{2} \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \int _{x}^{\mu _{n}(x)} \bigl( \mu _{n}(x)-s \bigr) g^{ \prime \prime }(s)\,ds \biggr\vert \leq \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \bigl(\mu _{n}(x)-x\bigr)^{2}= \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \bigl( K_{n}^{l}(t-x;x) \bigr) ^{2}, \end{aligned}$$

which implies

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(g;x)-g(x) \bigr\vert & \leq \biggl\vert K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \int _{x}^{t}(t-s)g^{\prime \prime}(s)\,ds;x \biggr) \biggr\vert + \biggl\vert \int _{x}^{\mu _{n}(x)} \bigl( \mu _{n}(x)-s \bigr) g^{\prime \prime }(s)\,ds \biggr\vert \\ & \leq \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \bigl\{ K_{n}^{l}\bigl((t-x)^{2};x\bigr)+\bigl(K_{n}^{l} ( t-x );x \bigr)^{2} \bigr\} \\ & = \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \delta _{n}(x). \end{aligned}$$

We also have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(f;x) \bigr\vert \leq \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f(x) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f\bigl( \mu _{n}(x)\bigr) \bigr\vert \leq K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert f \vert ;x \bigr) +2 \Vert f \Vert \leq 3 \Vert f \Vert . \end{aligned}$$

Using (2) and the uniform boundedness of \(\widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq \bigl\vert \widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(f-g;x) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert \widetilde{K}_{n}^{l}(g;x)-g(x) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f(x)-g(x) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f \bigl( \mu _{n}(x) \bigr) -f(x) \bigr\vert \\ & \leq 4 \Vert f-g \Vert + \bigl\Vert g^{\prime \prime} \bigr\Vert \delta _{n}(x)+\omega \bigl( f,\theta _{n}(x) \bigr) \text{.} \end{aligned}$$

If we take the infimum on the right hand side over all \(g\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq 4K_{2} \bigl( f; \delta _{n}(x) \bigr) +\omega \bigl( f, \theta _{n}(x) \bigr), \end{aligned}$$

which together with (1) gives the proof of the theorem. □

Corollary 7

Let \(A>0\). Then, for each \(f\in C[0,\infty )\), the sequence of operators \(K_{n}^{l}(f;x)\) converges to f uniformly on \([ 0,A ] \).

Theorem 8

Let \(f\in C_{2}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \). Then \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}K_{n}^{l}(f;x)=f(x)\), uniformly on \([0,A]\).



$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l}(1;x)\rightarrow 1,\qquad K_{n}^{l}(t;x) \rightarrow x,\qquad K_{n}^{l}\bigl(t^{2};x \bigr)\rightarrow x^{2}\quad\text{as }n\rightarrow \infty {,} \end{aligned}$$

uniformly in \([ 0,\infty ) \). By the Korovkin theorem, \(K_{n}^{l}(f;x)\) converges to \(f(x)\) uniformly on \([0,A]\). □

Theorem 9

Let \(n\geq l^{2}\), \(f\in C_{2} [ 0,\infty ) \) and \(\omega _{A+1}(f,\delta )=\sup_{ \vert t-x \vert \leq \delta}\sup_{x,t\in {}[ 0,A+1]} \vert f(t)-f(x) \vert \) be the modulus of continuity on the interval \([ 0,A+1 ] \subset [ 0,\infty ) \), where \(A>0\). Then we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\Vert _{C [ 0,A ] } \leq 4M_{f} \bigl( 1+A^{2} \bigr) \alpha _{n}(A)+2\omega _{A+1} \bigl( f,\sqrt{\alpha _{n}(A)} \bigr), \end{aligned}$$

where \(\alpha _{n}(A)=K_{n}^{l}((t-x)^{2};A)\).


For \(x\in [ 0,A ] \) and \(t\geq 0\), we can get (see [8], Eq. 3.3)

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq 4M_{f} \bigl( 1+A^{2} \bigr) (t-x)^{2}+ \biggl( 1+\frac{ \vert t-x \vert }{\delta} \biggr) \omega _{A+1} ( f,\delta ). \end{aligned}$$

Now, by the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x) \bigr\vert ;x \bigr) \\ & \leq 4M_{f} \bigl( 1+A^{2} \bigr) K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) + \biggl( 1+K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert }{\delta };x \biggr) \biggr) \omega _{A+1} ( f,\delta ) \\ & \leq 4M_{f} \bigl( 1+A^{2} \bigr) K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) +\omega _{A+1} ( f,\delta ) \biggl( 1+ \frac{1}{\delta} \bigl( K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) \bigr) ^{ \frac{1}{2}} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$

For \(x\in [ 0,A ] \), using Lemma 4,

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l} \bigl( (t-x)^{2};x \bigr) = \frac{x^{2}l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}+\frac{x(n-l^{2})}{(n+l)^{2}}+\frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}\leq \alpha _{n}(A). \end{aligned}$$

Thus we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq 4M_{f} \bigl( 1+A^{2} \bigr) \alpha _{n}(A)+ \omega _{A+1} ( f,\delta ) \biggl( 1+\frac{1}{\delta } \bigl( \alpha _{n}(A) \bigr) ^{\frac{1}{2}} \biggr). \end{aligned}$$

By taking \(\delta =\sqrt{\alpha _{n}(A)}\), we get the desired result. □

In the following theorem we give a Voronovskaja-type result for the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators.

Theorem 10

For any \(f\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\), the following asymptotic equality holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}n\bigl(K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr)=\frac {l(1-2x)}{2}f^{ \prime }(x)+\frac{1}{2}xf^{\prime \prime}(x) \end{aligned}$$

uniformly on \([0,A]\).


Let \(f\in C_{B}^{2}[0,\infty )\) and \(x\in {}[ 0,\infty )\) be fixed. By using Taylor’s formula, we write

$$\begin{aligned} f(t)=f(x)+f^{\prime}(x) (t-x)+\frac{1}{2}f^{\prime \prime}(x) (t-x)^{2}+r(t,x) (t-x)^{2} {,} \end{aligned}$$

where the function \(r(t,x)\) is the Peano form of the remainder, \(r(t,x)\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\) and \(\lim_{t\rightarrow x}r(t,x)=0\). Applying \(K_{n}^{l}\) to (3), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} & n \bigl( K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr) \\ &\quad =nf^{\prime}(x)K_{n}^{l}(t-x;x)+ \frac{n}{2}f^{\prime \prime}(x)K_{n}^{l}\bigl( ( t-x ) ^{2};x\bigr)+nK_{n}^{l}\bigl(r(t,x) ( t-x ) ^{2};x\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

By using the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, we get

$$\begin{aligned} K_{n}^{l}\bigl(r(t,x) ( t-x ) ^{2};x\bigr)\leq \sqrt{K_{n}^{l}\bigl(r^{2}(t,x);x \bigr)}\sqrt{K_{n}^{l}\bigl((t-x)^{4};x \bigr).} \end{aligned}$$

We observe that \(r^{2}(x,x)=0\) and \(r^{2}(.,x)\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\). Now from Corollary 7 it follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}K_{n}^{l}\bigl(r^{2}(t,x);x \bigr)=r^{2}(x,x)=0 \end{aligned}$$

uniformly with respect to \(x\in {}[ 0,A]\). Finally, from (4), (5), and Lemma 5, we get immediately

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}nK_{n}^{l}\bigl(r(t,x) ( t-x ) ^{2};x\bigr)=0, \end{aligned}$$

which completes the proof. □

Theorem 11

Let \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) and S be any subset of the interval \([0,\infty )\). Then, if \(f\in C_{B}[0,\infty )\) is locally \(Lip(\alpha )\), i.e., the condition

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert f(y)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq L \vert y-x \vert ^{ \alpha },\quad y\in S\textit{ and }x\in {}[ 0,\infty ) \end{aligned}$$

holds, then, for each \(x\in {}[ 0,\infty )\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq L \bigl\{ \lambda _{n}^{\frac{\alpha}{2}}(x)+2\bigl(d(x,S) \bigr)^{\alpha} \bigr\} , \end{aligned}$$

where \(\lambda _{n}(x)=\frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{n-l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac{l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}\), L is a constant depending on α and f, and \(d(x,S)\) is the distance between x and S defined as

$$\begin{aligned} d(x,S)=\inf \bigl\{ \vert t-x \vert :t\in S \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$


Let be the closure of S in \([0,\infty )\). Then there exists a point \(x_{0}\in \bar{S}\) such that \(\vert x-x_{0} \vert =d(x,S)\). By the triangle inequality

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x_{0}) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert f(x)-f(x_{0}) \bigr\vert \end{aligned}$$

and by (6), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x_{0}) \bigr\vert ;x \bigr) +K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl\vert f(x)-f(x_{0}) \bigr\vert ;x \bigr) \\ & \leq L \bigl\{ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert t-x_{0} \vert ^{ \alpha };x \bigr) + \vert x-x_{0} \vert ^{\alpha} \bigr\} \\ & \leq L \bigl\{ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert t-x \vert ^{ \alpha }+ \vert x-x_{0} \vert ^{\alpha};x \bigr) + \vert x-x_{0} \vert ^{\alpha} \bigr\} \\ & \leq L \bigl\{ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert t-x \vert ^{ \alpha };x \bigr) +2 \vert x-x_{0} \vert ^{\alpha} \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$

Now, by using the Hölder inequality with \(p=\frac{2}{\alpha}\) and \(q=\frac{2}{2-\alpha}\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq L \bigl\{ \bigl[ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert t-x \vert ^{\alpha p};x \bigr) \bigr] ^{\frac{1}{p}} \bigl[ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( 1^{q};x \bigr) \bigr] ^{ \frac{1}{q}}+2 \bigl( d(x,S) \bigr) ^{\alpha} \bigr\} \\ & =L \bigl\{ \bigl[ K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \vert t-x \vert ^{2};x \bigr) \bigr] ^{\frac{\alpha}{2}}+2 \bigl( d(x,S) \bigr) ^{ \alpha } \bigr\} \\ & =L \biggl\{ \biggl[ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{n-l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x+ \frac{l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2} \biggr] ^{\frac{\alpha}{2}}+2 \bigl( d(x,S) \bigr) ^{\alpha} \biggr\} \\ & =L \bigl\{ \bigl(\lambda _{n}(x)\bigr)^{\frac{\alpha}{2}}+2 \bigl( d(x,S) \bigr) ^{\alpha} \bigr\} , \end{aligned}$$

and the proof is completed. □

4 Weighted approximation

In this section, we give weighted approximation theorems for the lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators. We will use the following two lemmas which can be found in [3] and [12].

Lemma 12

For \(m\in \mathbb{N} \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} S_{n}\bigl(t^{j_{0}};x\bigr)=\sum_{j=1}^{j_{0}}a_{j_{0},j} \frac {x^{j}}{n^{j_{0}-j}}, \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} &a_{j_{0}+1,j} =ja_{j_{0},j}+a_{j_{0},j-1},\quad j_{0}\geq 0, j\geq 1, \\ &a_{0,0} =1, \qquad a_{j_{0},0}=0,\quad j_{0}>0,\qquad a_{j_{0},j}=0,\quad j_{0}< j. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 13

Let \(m\in \mathbb{N} \cup \{ 0 \} \) and \(l\in \mathbb{Z} ^{+}\) be fixed. Then there exists a positive constant \(C_{m}(l)\) such that

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}\bigl(1+t^{m};x\bigr) \bigr\Vert _{m}\leq C_{m}(l),\quad n\in \mathbb{N}. \end{aligned}$$

Moreover, for every \(f\in C_{2}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x) \bigr\Vert _{m}\leq C_{m}(l) \Vert f \Vert _{m},\quad n\in \mathbb{N}. \end{aligned}$$

Thus \(K_{n}^{l}\) is a linear positive operator from \(C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \) into \(C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \) for any \(m\in \mathbb{N} \cup \{ 0 \} \).


Inequality (8) is obvious for \(m=0\). Let \(m\geq 1\). Then, by Lemma 12, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{1}{1+x^{m}}K_{n}^{l}\bigl(1+t^{m};x\bigr)\\ &\quad= \frac{1}{1+x^{m}}+ \frac{1}{1+x^{m}}\sum_{j_{0}+\cdots+j_{l}=m} \binom{m}{j_{0,}\cdots j_{l}} \frac{n^{j_{0}}}{(n+l)^{m}(j_{1}+1)\cdots (j_{l}+1)} \sum_{j=1}^{j_{0}}a_{j_{0},j} \frac{x^{j}}{n^{j_{0}-j}}. \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{1+x^{m}}K_{n}^{l}\bigl(1+t^{m};x\bigr) \leq 1+k_{m}(l)=C_{m}(l), \end{aligned}$$

where \(C_{m}(l)\) is a positive constant depending on m and l. On the other hand,

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x) \bigr\Vert _{m}\leq \Vert f \Vert _{m} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l} \bigl(1+t^{m};x\bigr) \bigr\Vert _{m} \end{aligned}$$

for every \(f\in C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \). By applying (8), we obtain (9). □

Theorem 14

For each \(f\in C_{2}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \), one has

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\Vert _{2}=0. \end{aligned}$$


To prove this theorem, we need to use a Korovkin-type theorem on weighted approximation. That is, it is sufficient to verify the following three conditions:

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l} \bigl(t^{m};x\bigr)-x^{m} \bigr\Vert _{2}=0,\quad m=0,1,2. \end{aligned}$$

For \(m=0\), it is obvious. For \(m=1\), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(t;x)-x \bigr\Vert _{2} & =\sup_{x\geq 0} \frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(t;x)-x \vert }{1+x^{2}} \\ & =\sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{1}{1+x^{2}} \biggl\vert \frac{l}{2(n+l)}+\frac{n}{ ( n+l ) }x-x \biggr\vert \\ & \leq \frac{l}{2(n+l)}\sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{1}{1+x^{2}}+ \frac {l}{ ( n+l ) }\sup_{x\geq 0} \frac{x}{1+x^{2}} \\ & \leq \frac{l}{2(n+l)}+\frac{l}{ ( n+l ) }= \frac{3l}{2(n+l)}, \end{aligned}$$

and by a similar way, we can write

$$\begin{aligned} &\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l} \bigl(t^{2};x\bigr)-x \bigr\Vert _{2}\\ & \quad=\sup _{x\geq 0} \frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(t^{2};x)-x^{2} \vert }{1+x^{2}} \\ &\quad =\sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{1}{1+x^{2}} \biggl\vert \frac{n^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}x^{2}+\frac{n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}x+\frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}-x^{2} \biggr\vert \\ & \quad\leq \biggl\vert \frac{-l^{2}-2nl}{(n+l)^{2}} \biggr\vert \sup_{x\geq 0} \frac{x^{2}}{1+x^{2}}+ \frac{n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}\sup_{x\geq 0} \frac{x}{1+x^{2}}+ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}\sup_{x\geq 0} \frac {1}{1+x^{2}} \\ & \quad\leq \frac{l^{2}+2nl}{(n+l)^{2}}+\frac{n(l+1)}{(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}, \end{aligned}$$

which implies that

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l} \bigl(t^{m};x\bigr)-x^{m} \bigr\Vert _{2}=0,\quad m=0,1,2. \end{aligned}$$


Theorem 15

For each \(f\in C_{2}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \) and all \(\beta >0\), one has

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \vert }{(1+x^{2})^{1+\beta}}=0. \end{aligned}$$


For any fixed \(0< A<\infty \) and by Lemma 13, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sup_{x\geq 0} \frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} ={}&\sup_{x\leq A}\frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}}+\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} \\ \leq{}& \sup_{x\leq A} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert +\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x) \vert + \vert f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} \\ \leq{}& \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f)-f \bigr\Vert _{C [ 0,A ] }+ \Vert f \Vert _{2}\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{\vert K_{n}^{l}(1+t^{2};x\vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} \\ &{} +\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{ \vert f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} \\ ={}&J_{1}+J_{2}+J_{3}. \end{aligned}$$

Using Theorem 9, we can see that \(J_{1}\) goes to zero as \(n\rightarrow \infty \).

By Theorem 14, we can get

$$\begin{aligned} J_{2} & = \Vert f \Vert _{2} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sup_{x\geq A} \frac{\vert K_{n}^{l}(1+t^{2};x\vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}} \\ & =\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{ \Vert f \Vert _{2}}{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{\beta}}\leq \frac{ \Vert f \Vert _{2}}{ ( 1+A^{2} ) ^{\beta}}. \end{aligned}$$

Since \(\vert f(x) \vert \leq M_{f}(1+x^{2})\),

$$\begin{aligned} J_{3}=\sup_{x\geq A} \frac{ \vert f(x) \vert }{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{1+\beta}}\leq \sup _{x\geq A} \frac{M_{f}}{ ( 1+x^{2} ) ^{\beta}}\leq \frac{M_{f}}{ ( 1+A^{2} ) ^{\beta}}. \end{aligned}$$

If we choose A large enough, we get

$$\begin{aligned} J_{2}\rightarrow 0\quad\text{and}\quad J_{3}\rightarrow 0\quad\text{as }n \rightarrow \infty. \end{aligned}$$

Hence by (10) we obtain the desired result

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} \sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{ \vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \vert }{(1+x^{2})^{1+\beta}}=0. \end{aligned}$$


For \(f\in C_{2}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \), the weighted modulus of continuity is defined as

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega _{m}(f,\delta )= \sup_{x\geq 0, 0< h\leq \delta}\frac{ \vert f(x+h)-f(x) \vert }{1+(x+h)^{m}}. \end{aligned}$$

Lemma 16

If \(f\in C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ),m\in \mathbb{N} \), then

  1. (i)

    \(\Omega _{m}(f,\delta )\) is a monotone increasing function of δ,

  2. (ii)

    \(\lim_{\delta \rightarrow \infty}\Omega _{m}(f,\delta )=0\),

  3. (iii)

    for any \(\rho \in [ 0,\infty ),\Omega _{m}(f,\rho \delta )\leq (1+\rho )\Omega _{m}(f,\delta )\).

Theorem 17

If \(f\in C_{m}^{\ast} [ 0,\infty ) \), then

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\Vert K_{n}^{l}(f)-f \bigr\Vert _{m+1}\leq k\Omega _{m} \biggl( f, \frac {1}{\sqrt{n+l}} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$

where k is a constant independent of f and n.


From the definition of \(\Omega _{m}(f,\delta )\) and Lemma 16, we may write

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert f(t)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq \bigl( 1+ \bigl( x+ \vert t-x \vert \bigr) ^{m} \bigr) \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert }{\delta}+1 \biggr) \Omega _{m}(f, \delta ) \\ & \leq \bigl( 1+ ( 2x+t ) ^{m} \bigr) \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert }{\delta}+1 \biggr) \Omega _{m}(f, \delta ). \end{aligned}$$

Then we have

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq K_{n}^{l}\vert \bigl(f(t)-f(x)\vert;x\bigr) \\ & \leq \Omega _{m}(f,\delta )K_{n}^{l} \bigl( 1+(2x+t)^{m};x \bigr) +K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl( 1+(2x+t)^{m} \bigr);x \bigr) \\ & =\Omega _{m}(f,\delta )K_{n}^{l} \bigl( 1+(2x+t)^{m};x \bigr) +I_{1}. \end{aligned}$$

Applying the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality to \(I_{1}\), we get

$$\begin{aligned} I_{1}\leq K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl(1+(2x+t)^{m} \bigr) ^{2};x\bigr))^{1/2} \biggl( K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert ^{2}}{\delta ^{2}};x \biggr) \biggr) ^{1/2}. \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert \leq {}&\Omega _{m}(f, \delta )K_{n}^{l} \bigl(1+(2x+t)^{m};x\bigr)\\ &{}+K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl(1+(2x+t)^{m} \bigr) ^{2};x \bigr))^{1/2} \biggl( K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert ^{2}}{\delta ^{2}};x \biggr) \biggr) ^{1/2}. \end{aligned}$$

From Lemmas 13 and 12, we have

$$\begin{aligned} &K_{n}^{l}\bigl(1+(2x+t)^{m};x\bigr)\leq C_{m}(l) \bigl( 1+x^{m} \bigr),\\ &K_{n}^{l} \bigl( \bigl(1+(2x+t)^{m} \bigr) ^{2};x\bigr))^{1/2} \biggl( K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert ^{2}}{\delta ^{2}};x \biggr) \biggr) ^{1/2}\leq C_{m}^{1}(l) \bigl( 1+x^{m} \bigr). \end{aligned}$$

Also, from Lemma 4, we have

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl( K_{n}^{l} \biggl( \frac{ \vert t-x \vert ^{2}}{\delta ^{2}};x \biggr) \biggr) ^{1/2} & \leq \frac{1}{\delta}\sqrt{ \frac{x^{2}l^{2}}{(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{x(n-l^{2})}{(n+l)^{2}}+ \frac{3l^{2}+l}{12(n+l)^{2}}} \\ & \leq \frac{l(1+x)}{\delta \sqrt{ ( n+l ) }}. \end{aligned}$$

So, if we combine all these results, we get

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert K_{n}^{l}(f;x)-f(x) \bigr\vert & \leq \Omega _{m}(f, \delta ) \biggl( C_{m}(l) \bigl( 1+x^{m} \bigr) +C_{m}^{1}(l) \frac{ ( 1+x^{m} ) ( 1+x ) l}{\delta \sqrt{ ( n+l ) }} \biggr) \\ & =\Omega _{m}(f,\delta ) \biggl( C_{m}(l) \bigl( 1+x^{m} \bigr) +C_{m}^{1}(l)C_{1} \frac{l ( 1+x^{m+1} ) }{\delta \sqrt{ ( n+l ) }} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$


$$\begin{aligned} C_{1}=\sup_{x\geq 0}\frac{1+x^{m}+x+x^{m+1}}{1+x^{m+1}}. \end{aligned}$$

In the above inequality, if we substitute \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+l}}\) instead of δ, we obtain the desired result. □

5 Conclusion

In this paper, by using the lth order integration and the definition of the Kantorovich type Szász–Mirakjan operators, we defined a new lth order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operator. We derived a recurrence formula, and with the help of this formula we calculated the moments \(K_{n}^{l} ( t^{m};x ) \) for \(m=0,1,2,3,4\) and we calculated the central moments \(K_{n}^{l} ( (t-x)^{m};x ) \) for \(m=1,2,4\). We established a local approximation theorem, a Korovkin-type approximation theorem, and a Voronovskaja-type theorem. We obtained the rate of convergence of these types of operators for Lipschitz-type maximal functions, second order modulus of smoothness, and Peetre’s K-functional. At last we investigated weighted approximation properties of the lth order Szász–Mirakjan–Kantorovich operators in terms of the modulus of continuity.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.


  1. Aslan, R.: Some approximation results on λ-Szász–Mirakjan–Kantorovich operators. Fundam. J. Math. Appl. 4(3), 150–158 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aslan, R.: On a Stancu form Szász–Mirakjan–Kantorovich operators based on shape parameter λ. Adv. Studies: Euro-Tbilisi Math. J. 15(1), 151–166 (2022)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, M.: Global approximation theorems for Szasz–Mirakjan and Baskakov operators in polynomial weight spaces. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27(1), 127–142 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ditzian, Z., Totik, V.: Moduli of Smoothness. Springer, New York (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubey, D.K., Jain, V.K.: Rate of approximation for integrated Szasz–Mirakjan operators. Demonstr. Math. XLI, Article ID 4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonska, H.: Quantitative Korovkin-type theorems on simultaneous approximation. Math. Z. 186, 419–433 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonska, H., Păltănea, R.: General Voronovskaya and asymptotic theorems in simultaneous approximation. Mediterr. J. Math. 7, 37–49 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, V., Aral, A.: Convergence of the q-analogue of Szász-beta operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 216, 374–380 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, V., Sinha, J.: Direct results on certain Szasz–Mirakyan operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 195, 230–239 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Icoz, G., Çekim, B.: Stancu-type generalization of Dunkl analogue of Szász–Kantorovich operators. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39(7), 1803–1810 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kacsó, D.: Certain Bernstein–Durrmeyer Operators Preserving Linear Functions. Habilitationsschrift, University of Duisburg-Essen (2008)

  12. Mahmudov, N.I.: On q-parametric Szasz–Mirakjan operators. Mediterr. J. Math. 7(3), 297–311 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmudov, N.I.: Approximation by the q-Szasz–Mirakjan operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 754217 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmudov, N.I., Sabancigil, P.: Voronovskaja type theorem for the Lupas q-analogue of the Bernstein operators. Math. Commun. 17(1), 83–91 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mursaleen, M., Nasiruzzaman, M., Srivastava, H.M.: Approximation by bicomplex beta operators in compact BC-disks. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 39, Article ID 11 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasiruzzaman, M.: Approximation properties by Szász Mirakjan operators to bivariate functions via Dunkl analogue. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasiruzzaman, M., Mukheimer, A., Mursaleen, M.: A Dunkl-type generalization of Szász–Kantorovich operators via post quantum calculus. Symmetry 11(2), 232 (2019).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Nasiruzzaman, M., Srivastava, H.M., Mohiuddine, S.A.: Approximation process based on parametric generalization of Schurer–Kantorovich operators and their bivariate form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. A Phys. Sci. (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips, G.M.: Interpolation and Approximation by Polynomials. CMS Books in Mathematics, vol. 14. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Sabancigil, P.: Higher order generalization of q-Bernstein operators. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 12(4), 821–827 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Srivastava, H.M., Mursaleen, M., Alotaibi, A., Nasiruzzaman, M., Al-Abied, A.A.H.: Some approximation results involving the q-Szász–Mirakjan–Kantrovich type operators via Dunkl’s generalization. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 40(15), 5437–5452 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Sucu, S.: Dunkl analogue of Szász operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 244, 42–48 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Szász, O.: Generalization of S. Bernstein’s polynomials to the infinite interval. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 45, 239–245 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



PS made the major analysis and the orijinal draft preparation. MK contributed with weighted approximation and NM reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pembe Sabancigil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabancigil, P., Kara, M. & Mahmudov, N.I. Higher order Kantorovich-type Szász–Mirakjan operators. J Inequal Appl 2022, 91 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Modulus of continuity
  • Higher order approximation
  • Szász–Mirakjan operators
  • Kantorovich operators
  • Voronovskaja-type theorem