- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Some inequalities on multi-functions for applying in the fractional Caputo–Hadamard jerk inclusion system
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2022, Article number: 84 (2022)
Abstract
Results reported in this paper establish the existence of solutions for a class of generalized fractional inclusions based on the Caputo–Hadamard jerk system. Under some inequalities between multi-functions and with the help of special contractions and admissible maps, we investigate the existence criteria. Fixed points and end points are key roles in this manuscript, and the approximate property for end points helps us to derive the desired result for existence theory. An example is prepared to demonstrate the consistency and correctness of analytical findings.
1 Introduction
With the presentation of new analytical results in recent years, the power of fractional calculus in describing processes and modeling physical events and engineering tools has become clear to everyone. In most published papers we are able to observe different generalized fractional modelings of standard equations in which the Caputo or Riemann–Liouville derivatives or their extensions have been utilized in fractional differential equations (FDEs) and fractional differential inclusions (FDIs) such as pantograph inclusion [1], hybrid thermostat inclusion [2], q-differential inclusion on time scale [3], Langevin inclusion [4], and higher order fractional differential inequalities [5]. One can find many published works on various applications of fractional calculus in different fields of science (see, for example, [6–16]).
In 2016, the authors considered the following mixed initial value problem involving Hadamard derivative and Riemann–Liouville fractional integrals given by
where \({}^{H }\mathbb{D}^{q}\) denotes the Hadamard fractional derivative of order \(0 < q\leq 1\), \({}^{RC }\mathbb{I}_{r}^{\sigma}\) is the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of order \(\sigma >0\), \(\sigma \in \{\sigma _{1}, \sigma _{2}, \dots , \sigma _{m}\}\), \(\mathfrak{H}: [1, M ] \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})\), \(w_{i} \in C([1, M] \times \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\) with \(w_{i}(1,0)=0\), \(i=1,2,\dots , m\) [17]. In 2017, Ahmad et al. considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions to the initial value problem of Caputo–Hadamard sequential fractional order neutral functional differential equations as follows:
where \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}^{\sigma _{1}}\), \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}^{\sigma _{2}}\) are the Caputo–Hadamard fractional derivatives, \(0 < \alpha , \beta <1\), \(f_{i}: [1, M] \times C([-r, 0], \mathbb{R}) \to \mathbb{R}\) is a given function, \(i=1,2\), and \(\phi \in C([1-r, 1], \mathbb{R})\) [18]. The authors in [19] introduced a new class of boundary value problems consisting of Caputo–Hadamard type fractional differential equations and Hadamard type fractional integral boundary conditions:
where \(0 <\beta <1\), \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}^{(.)}\), \(\mathbb{I}^{(.)}\) respectively denote the Caputo–Hadamard fractional derivative and Hadamard fractional integral (to be defined later), \(w_{i}: [0, \delta ] \times \mathbb{R}^{3} \to \mathbb{R}\) is a given appropriate function and \(a_{ij}\), \(K_{i}\) are real constants, here \(i,j=1,2\) [19].
More precisely, in [1], Thabet et al. formulated a version of FDI taken from the pantograph BVP in the sense of Caputo-conformable equipped with three-point RL-conformable integral conditions:
Here, \({}^{CC }\mathbb{D}_{r}^{q,\sigma _{1}}\) indicates the derivative of the Caputo-conformable type of order \(1 < \sigma _{1} < 2\) along with \(0 < q <1\), \({}^{RC }\mathbb{I}_{r}^{q,\sigma _{2}}\) is the integral of the RL-conformable type of order \(\sigma _{2}>0\), \(\zeta \in (r, M)\), \(p_{1}\), \(p_{2}\), \(y^{\ast}\in \mathbb{R}\), \(0 < \lambda <1\), and \(\mathfrak{H}: [r, M] \times \mathbb{R}^{2} \to \mathcal{P} ( \mathbb{R})\) is a multifunction. Also, Baleanu et al. in [2] investigated the hybrid problem caused by the thermostat model
so that \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}_{0}^{q}\) is the Caputo derivation of fractional order \(1 < q\leq 2\), \(\mathbb{D} = \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\) the function \(w : [0,1] \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} \) is continuous, \(\varkappa \in C([0,1]\times \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\} )\), η is a positive real parameter and \(0 \leq a \leq 1\). Furthermore, Samei et al. in [3] discussed the fractional q-differential inclusion
Here, \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}_{q}^{\sigma}\) denotes the Caputo fractional quantum derivative of order \(2 < \sigma \leq 3\), \(1< p_{i}\leq 2\), (\(i=1,2,\dots , m\)), \(0 < \tau <1\), \(c = \sum_{j=1}^{m} c_{i}\), \(c_{j} \in \mathbb{R}\), \(\varrho : [0, \infty ) \to [0, \infty )\) defined by
\(\varphi : [0, \infty ) \to [0, \infty )\), \(\mathfrak{H}: [0,1]\times \mathbb{R}^{m+2} \to \mathcal{P}( \mathbb{R})\) is a compact-valued multifunction and \(a_{1}, a_{2}, a_{3} \in \mathbb{R}\). Recently, Rezapour et al. introduced and investigated a new BVP consisting of a generalized fractional integro-Langevin equation with constant coefficient and nonlocal fractional boundary conditions (BCs) given by
where \(0 < q_{1} < 1\), \(1 < q_{2} < 2\), \(p>0\), \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}^{+}\), \({}^{C }\mathbb{D}_{0^{+}}^{\eta}\), (\(\eta \in \{ q_{1}, q_{2}\}\)) and \({}^{RL }\mathbb{I}_{0^{+}}^{p}\) denote the Caputo fractional derivative operators and the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral of orders p and η, respectively, and the function \(h: [0,1] \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}\) is continuous [4].
The authors in [5] showed how fractional differential inequalities can be useful to establish the properties of solutions of different problems in biomathematics and flow phenomena. The nonexistence of global solutions to a higher order fractional differential inequality with a nonlinearity involving Caputo fractional derivative has been obtained [5]. On the other hand in [20] the authors analyzed the properties of fractional operators with fixed memory length in the context of Laplace transform of the Riemann–Liouville fractional integral and derivative with fixed memory length [20] on the fractional differential equation
These facts could be used to better explain the motivation behind the present study [20]. Jleli et al. studied the wave inequality with a Hardy potential
where Ω is the exterior of the unit ball in \(\mathbb{R}^{N}\), (\(N\geq 2\)), \(p>1\), and
under the inhomogeneous boundary condition \(\alpha \frac{\partial y}{\partial x} (t, x) + \beta y(t, x) \geq w(x)\) on \((0, \infty )\times \partial \Omega \), where \(\alpha , \beta \geq 0\) and \((\alpha , \beta ) \neq (0,0)\) [21]. The Caputo–Hadamard derivation operator [22] is another extension of the above operators that many researchers got help from it in their modelings. For instance, we can find the applications of this generalized operator in modeling of the Sturm–Liouville–Langevin problem [23], investigation of the combination synchronization of a Caputo–Hadamard system [24], description of an uncertain BVP‘ [25], studying the proportional Langevin BVP [26], etc.
Our main novelty in this work is to use the Caputo–Hadamard operator for generalizing the standard jerk problem in the form of a fractional inclusion problem. In fact, a jerk system is a simple form of a nonlinear ODE of third order depicted by
where, in mechanics, the nonlinear mapping \(\mathcal{F}(\cdot , \cdot , \cdot )\) is equivalent to the 1st-derivative of acceleration. For this reason, it is introduced as a jerk [27, 28].
The mathematical analysis of this generalized system is our main purpose in this work. To do this, we decided to utilize a new family of multi-functions belonging to ϕ-admissibles and ϕ-ψ-contractions for proving theorems based on fixed point methods. Also, those multi-functions that have approximate property for their end points play a fundamental role in our analysis. These items present the novelty and contribution of our work in this regard, because most researchers get help from standard fixed point techniques in their papers. For example, the Leray–Schauder, the Banach principle, Krasnoselskii, degree principle, Schaefer are the most famous of them, and they are applied in more papers including the generalized proportional equation by Das et al. in [29], impulsive implicit problem by Ali et al. in [30], nonlinear ϕ-Hilfer problem on compact domain by Mottaghi et al. in [31], multi-term multi-strip coupled system by Ahmad et al. in [32], ψ-Hilfer system of coupled Langevin equations by Sudsutad et al. in [33], sequential RL-Hadamard–Caputo problem by Ntouyas et al. in [34], sequential post-quantum integro-difference problem by Soontharanon et al. in [35] and Samei in [36–38], Neumann symmetric Hahn problem by Dumrongpokaphan et al. in [39], etc.
By virtue of the idea of a standard jerk equation and extending it to the generalized fractional Caputo–Hadamard settings, we here introduce and study new existence methods based on some special multi-functions to guarantee the existence of solution for the extended fractional jerk inclusion problem illustrated as
in which \(\iota _{1},\iota _{2},\iota _{3} \in (0,1]\) and \({}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{p}\) displays the derivative operator in the sense of Caputo–Hadamard subject to \(p \in \{ \iota _{1}, \iota _{2}, \iota _{3} \}\) and also \(t\in I := [1,e]\) and \(\eta \in (1,e)\). In addition to these, we have considered the operator \(\mathbb{G}: I \times \mathbb{R}^{3} \rightarrow \mathcal{P}( \mathbb{R})\) as a multi-function in which \(\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R})\) illustrates all nonempty subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\).
This research is conducted as follows. Section 2 is fundamental and necessary in its nature since it collects definitions and required results. Section 3 is divided into two parts: one is in relation to the existence criterion via fixed points and the second is in relation to the existence criterion via end points. In fact, in Sect. 3.1, some inequalities between multi-functions and contractions and admissible functions play the role to prove the desired results via fixed point notion. Accordingly, Sect. 3.2 is devoted to proving similar results via end points and approximate property for end points. Section 4 discusses an example for simulating and analyzing the results numerically. Section 5 completes our research via conclusions.
2 Preliminaries
Here, we shall review some primitive and fundamental concepts in the direction of used approaches and techniques in the present study. As you will observe, these notions and properties are utilized throughout the paper. The readers can find more details in [22, 40, 41].
Definition 2.1
Let \(q \geq 0\). Then the Hadamard fractional \(q^{\mathrm{th}}\)-integral of a continuous function \(y:(a,\infty )\to \mathbb{R}\) of order q is formulated by \({}^{H}\mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{0} y(t)=y(t) \) and
Definition 2.2
([22])
The Caputo–Hadamard fractional \(q^{\mathrm{th}}\)-derivative for \(y \in AC_{\delta}^{n}([a, b], \mathbb{R})\) is illustrated as
in which \(n-1 < q < n\) and \(\delta = t \frac {\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{dt}}\). Note that, for \(q=n\in \mathbb{N}\), we have
From here onwards, we denote the abbreviations HF-integral and CHF-derivative for the above fractional operators. To find other information on the CHF-operators, we direct the interested readers to [22].
Lemma 2.3
Let \(q,p \in \mathbb{R}^{+}\). Then:
-
(1)
\({}^{H}\mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{q} {}^{H}\mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{p} y(t)= {}^{H} \mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{ q + p} y(t)\), (Semi-group property for HF-integrals);
-
(2)
For \(n-1< q<n\), \(m-1< p< m\) and \(y(t) \in C_{\delta}^{m+n} [a,b]\), we have
$$ {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{a^{+}}^{q} {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{a^{+}}^{p} y(t)= {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{a^{+}}^{ q + p} y(t),$$(Semi-group property for CHF-derivatives);
-
(3)
For \(q>p\),
$$ {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{a^{+}}^{p} {}^{H} \mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{q} y(t)= {}^{H} \mathbb{I}_{a^{+}}^{ q - p} y(t),$$(Composition property for HF-CHF-operators).
Example 2.4
Let \(q , \iota \in \mathbb{R}^{+}\). For \(y(t) = ( \ln \frac {t}{a} )^{\iota}\), we have
Further, if \(y(t) \equiv c \in \mathbb{R}\), then
Lemma 2.5
([22])
Let \(y \in AC_{\delta}^{n}([a, b], \mathbb{R})\) and \(n -1 < q < n\).
For the homogeneous CHF-differential equation \({}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{a^{+}}^{q} y(t)=0\), its general solution, by virtue of Lemma 2.5, is obtained by
subject to \(s_{i} \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(n = [ q ] + 1\) [22]. Hence
for \(t>a\) [22].
In what follows we give a brief introduction to some special function spaces and multi-valued operators. We assume \((A,\|\cdot \|)\) as a normed space. We mean by \({\mathcal {P}}_{CL}( A )\), \({\mathcal {P}}_{BN}( A )\), \({\mathcal {P}}_{CP}( A )\), and \({\mathcal {P}}_{CV}( A )\) the category of all closed, bounded, compact, and convex sets, respectively, belonging to A.
Definition 2.6
([42])
The (Pompeiu–Hausdorff) metric, displayed by
is introduced as
in which ρ is a metric of A and
Definition 2.7
([42])
For \(\mathbb{G} : A \to {\mathcal {P}}_{CL} (A)\) and \(y_{1}, y_{2} \in A\), let
Then \(\mathbb{G}\) is called: (1) Lipschitz if \(L > 0\); (2) a contraction if \(L \in (0,1)\).
In the next step, we recall a specific family of multi-functions introduced by Amini-Harandi [42] in 2010 which we utilize in our proofs.
Definition 2.8
([42])
Let A be a metric space and \(\mathbb{G}\) be a multi-valued operator on it. Then
-
(1)
\(y \in A\) is an end point of \(\mathbb{G} :A\to \mathcal{P}(A)\) if \(\mathbb{G}y=\{ y\}\).
-
(2)
\(\mathbb{G}\) admits the AEP-property (approximate end point property) whenever
$$ \inf_{v\in A}\sup_{y\in \mathbb{G}v}\rho (v,y)=0.$$
Later, in 2013, Mohammadi, Rezapour, and Shahzad [43] provided another family of multi-functions based on two operators ψ and ϕ which is a generalized structure of a similar notion pertinent to single-valued operators given by Samet et al. [44] in 2012.
Definition 2.9
([43])
Let Ψ be a family of all increasing mappings \(\psi : \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}\to \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}\) s.t. \(\forall t>0\), \(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\psi ^{i}(t)<\infty \) and \(\psi (t)< t\). Let \(\mathbb{G}: A\to \mathcal{P}(A)\) and \(\phi : A\times A \to \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}\). In this case:
-
(1)
\(\mathbb{G}: A \to \mathcal{P}_{CL,BN}(A)\) is ϕ-ψ-contraction if \(\forall y_{1}, y_{2}\in A\),
$$ \phi (y_{1},y_{2}) H_{\rho}(\mathbb{G} y_{1}, \mathbb{G} y_{2})\leq \psi \bigl(\rho (y_{1}, y_{2})\bigr). $$ -
(2)
\(\mathbb{G}\) is ϕ-admissible if \(\forall y_{1}\in A\) and \(\forall y_{2}\in \mathbb{G}y_{1}\),
$$ \phi (y_{1},y_{2})\geq 1 \quad \Longrightarrow\quad \phi ( y_{2},y_{3})\geq 1,\quad \forall y_{3}\in \mathbb{G}y_{2}.$$ -
(3)
A admits the property \((C_{\phi})\) if for each \(\{ y_{n} \}_{n \geq 1} \subset A\) with \(y_{n}\to y\) and \(\phi (y_{n} , y_{n+1}) \geq 1\),
$$ \exists \{ y_{n_{i}} \} \subset \{ y_{n} \}, \quad \text{s.t.}\quad \phi (y_{n_{i}}, y)\geq 1, \quad \forall i\in \mathbb{N}.$$
To follow the required arguments on the existence of a solution for the Caputo–Hadamard fractional jerk problem (CHF-jerk problem) (1), we begin this section by introducing a Banach space as follows:
equipped with
for all \(y \in A\).
3 Existence results via fixed-points and end points
Now, in the next proposition, the solution’s structure for the supposed CHF-jerk problem (1) is exhibited in the format of an integral equation.
Proposition 3.1
Let \(\iota _{1},\iota _{2},\iota _{3} \in (0,1]\), \(\eta \in (1,e)\) and \(T \in C(I,\mathbb{R})\). Then the solution of the linear CHF-jerk problem
is obtained as
where
Proof
Let y satisfy the linear CHF-jerk problem (2). In view of the semi-group property for HF-integrals given in Lemma 2.3, since \(\iota _{1} \in (0,1]\), so by utilizing the HF-integral of order \(\iota _{1}\), we get
where \(c_{0} \in \mathbb{R}\). Again, utilizing the HF-integral of order \(\iota _{2} \in (0,1]\) to both sides of (5), we get
where \(c_{1} \in \mathbb{R}\). At last, utilizing the HF-integral of order \(\iota _{3} \in (0,1]\) to both sides of (6), the general series solution of (2) can be derived by
where \(c_{2} \in \mathbb{R}\). To obtain the values \(c_{i}\) (\(i=0,1,2\)), we first consider the third boundary condition and (5), and so the coefficient \(c_{0}\) is obtained as
In the sequel, the second boundary condition and the obtained value for \(c_{0}\) in (8) yield
Finally, (8) and (9) and the first boundary condition give
At this moment, we insert the value of the coefficients \(c_{i}\), by (8)–(10), into (7) and obtain
showing that y satisfies (3) and \(F_{1}(t)\), \(F_{2}(t)\) are continuous functions represented in (4). This ends the proof. □
3.1 Fixed-point and jerk model (1)
In this part, we define the solution to the CHF-jerk problem (1).
Definition 3.2
The function \(y \in C(I, A)\) is named the solution to the supposed CHF-jerk problem (1) whenever it fulfills the given BCs and \(\exists g \in L^{1}(I)\) s.t.
for almost all \(t\in I\) and
\(\forall t\in I\). For each \(y \in A\), we specify selections of \(\mathbb{G}\) as
In the sequel, define the multi-function \(K:A\to \mathcal{P}(A)\) by
for which
By making use of the following theorem relying on some inequalities between special multi-functions such as ϕ-ψ-contractions and ϕ-admissible, we establish the first criterion guaranteeing the existence of solution for the CHF-jerk problem (1).
Theorem 3.3
([43])
Regard the complete metric space \((A,\rho )\), \(\psi \in \Psi \), \(\phi : A \times A \to \mathbb{R}^{\geq 0}\) and \(\mathbb{G}: A \to \mathcal{P}_{CL,BN}(A)\). Assume that:
-
(1)
\(\mathbb{G}\) is ϕ-admissible and ϕ-ψ-contraction;
-
(2)
\(\phi (y_{0}, y_{1} )\geq 1\) for some \(y_{0} \in A\) and \(y_{1} \in \mathbb{G}y_{0}\);
-
(3)
A involves the \((C_{\phi})\)-property.
Then \(\mathbb{G}\) admits a fixed point.
Remark 3.4
For the sake of simplicity, we define
where for \(t\in I=[1,e]\),
and
and
Theorem 3.5
Let \(\mathbb{G}:I \times A^{3} \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\) be a multifunction and assume the following scenario:
- \((\mathcal{H}_{1})\):
-
The multifunction \(\mathbb{G}\) is bounded and integrable with \(\mathbb{G}(\cdot , y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}): I \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\) is measurable for all \(y_{m} \in A\) (\(m=1,2,3\));
- \((\mathcal{H}_{2})\):
-
There exist \(\kappa \in C(I, [0, \infty ))\) and \(\psi \in \Psi \) s.t.
$$ {H}_{\rho} (\mathbb{G}(t, y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}), \mathbb{G}(t, \bar{y}_{1}, \bar{y}_{2}, \bar{y}_{3} ) \leq \kappa (t) \biggl( \frac{\vartheta ^{\star}}{ \Vert \kappa \Vert } \biggr) \psi \Biggl(\sum_{m=1}^{3} \vert y_{m} - \bar{y}_{m} \vert \Biggr) $$(17)for all \(t \in I\) and \(y_{m}, \bar{y}_{m} \in A \) (\(m= 1,2,3\)), where \(\sup_{t\in I} \vert \kappa (t) \vert = \Vert \kappa \Vert \),
$$ \vartheta ^{\star}= \frac {1}{ \check{\Lambda}_{1} + \check{\Lambda}_{2}+ \check{\Lambda}_{3} },$$and \(\check{\Lambda}_{m}\) (\(m=1,2,3\)) are given by (13);
- \((\mathcal{H}_{3})\):
-
A function \(\Omega _{\star}:\mathbb{R}^{3} \times \mathbb{R}^{3} \to \mathbb{R}\) exists such that, for all \(y_{m}, \bar{y}_{m} \in A \) (\(m= 1,2,3\)), we have
$$ \Omega _{\star}\bigl((y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}), (\bar{y}_{1},\bar{y}_{2}, \bar{y}_{3} )\bigr) \geq 0;$$ - \((\mathcal{H}_{4})\):
-
If \(\{ y_{\jmath}\}_{\jmath \geq 1} \subset A\) s.t. \(y_{\jmath}\to y\) and
$$\begin{aligned} &\Omega _{\star}\bigl( \bigl(y_{\jmath}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}y_{\jmath}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl( {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y_{\jmath}(t) \bigr) \bigr), \\ &\quad \bigl(y_{\jmath +1}(t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y_{ \jmath +1}(t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y_{\jmath +1}(t) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \geq 0, \end{aligned}$$then \(\exists \{ y_{\jmath _{s}} \}_{s \geq 1} \subset \{y_{\jmath}\}\) exists such that, for all \(t \in I\) and \(s \geq 1\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} &\Omega _{\star}\bigl( \bigl(y_{\jmath _{s}}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}y_{\jmath _{s}}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}}\bigl( {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y_{\jmath _{s}}(t) \bigr) \bigr), \\ &\quad \bigl(y(t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y(t) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \geq 0; \end{aligned}$$ - \((\mathcal{H}_{5})\):
-
There exist a member \(y^{0} \in A\) and \(\mu \in K(y^{0})\) such that, for any \(t \in I\),
$$\begin{aligned} &\Omega \bigl( \bigl(y^{0}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y^{0}(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl( {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}y^{0}(t) \bigr) \bigr), \\ & \quad \bigl(\mu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}} \mu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}\mu (t)\bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \geq 0, \end{aligned}$$where the multifunction \(K: A \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) is specified by (11);
- \((\mathcal{H}_{6})\):
-
For every \(y \in A\) and \(\mu \in K(y)\) with
$$\begin{aligned} &\Omega _{\star}\bigl( \bigl( y(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}y(t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}y(t) \bigr) \bigr), \\ & \quad \bigl(\mu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}} \mu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}\mu (t) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \geq 0, \end{aligned}$$there exists a member \(\nu \in K(y)\) such that the inequality
$$\begin{aligned} &\Omega _{\star}\bigl( \bigl( \mu (t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}\mu (t), {}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH } \mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}}\mu (t) \bigr) \bigr), \\ & \quad \bigl(\nu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{3}} \nu (t), {}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{\iota _{2}} \bigl({}^{CH }\mathbb{D}_{1^{+}}^{ \iota _{3}}\nu (t) \bigr) \bigr) \bigr) \geq 0 \end{aligned}$$holds for all \(t\in I\).
Then, the CHF-jerk problem (1) owns a solution.
Proof
Definitely, the fixed point of the mapping \(K: A \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) is a solution of the CHF-jerk problem (1). Note that \(S_{\mathbb{G}, y}\) is nonempty. Indeed, the multifunction
is both measurable and closed-valued for any \(y \in A\), so \(S_{\mathbb{G}, y} \neq \emptyset \). Firstly, we will claim that \(K(y)\subseteq A\) is closed \(\forall y\in A\). As for, take a sequence \(\{ y_{n} \}_{n \geq 1}\) in \(K(y)\) such that \(y_{n} \to y\) as \(n\to \infty \). For each \(n \geq 1\), there is \(g_{n}\in S_{\mathbb{G}, y}\) such that
for all \(t\in I\). Since the multifunction \(\mathbb{G}\) has compact values, there is indeed a subsequence of \(\{g_{n} \}_{n \geq 1}\) (following the same notation) that converges to some \(g\in {L}^{1} (I)\). Subsequently, \(g\in S_{\mathbb{G}, y}\) and
for all \(t\in I\). As a result, we can deduce that \(y\in K(y)\) and K is closed-valued. The boundedness of \(K(y)\) is obvious from the compactness of multifunction \(\mathbb{G}\). Next, we prove that K is a ϕ-ψ-contraction. To do this, we regard \(\phi :A^{2}\mapsto {\mathbb{R}}_{\geq 0}\) by \(\phi (y, \bar{y})= 1\) whenever
and \(\phi (y, \bar{y})=0\) otherwise, where \(y, \bar{y} \in A\). Consider \(y, \bar{y} \in A\) and \(\ell _{1} \in K(\bar{y})\) and choose \(g_{1}\in S_{\mathbb{G}, \bar{y}}\) such that
for all \(t\in I\). By making use of (17), we get
with
Thus, there exists
such that
Now, consider a mapping \(\mathbb{U}: I \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) defined by
for any \(t\in I\). Since \(g_{1}\) and
are measurable, so the multivalued function
is also measurable. Now, suppose
so that we have
Define \(\ell _{2} \in K(y)\) by
for any \(t\in I\). Then we get the following inequalities as a result.
Also, we have
and
for all \(t\in I\). Consequently,
Accordingly, \(\phi (y, \bar{y}) \mathbb{H}_{\rho} ( K (y), K(\bar{y}) ) \leq \psi (\Vert y - \bar{y} \Vert )\) for all \(y, \bar{y} \in A\). This confirms that K is a ϕ-ψ-contraction. Next, suppose that \(y \in A\) and \(\bar{y} \in K (y)\) s.t. \(\phi (y, \bar{y}) \geq 1\) and
so there exists \(\wp \in K(\bar{y})\) such that
which further implies that \(\phi (\bar{y}, \wp ) \geq 1\) and accordingly K is ϕ-admissible. Finally, let \(y^{0} \in A\) and \(\bar{y} \in K(y^{0})\) so that
for all \(t\in I\). It follows that \(\phi (y^{0}, \bar{y}) \geq 1\). Assume \(\{ y_{\jmath}\}_{\jmath \geq 1} \subset A\) s.t. \(y_{\jmath}\to y\) and \(\phi (y_{\jmath}, y_{\jmath +1}) \geq 1\) for all ȷ. Then we have
Then hypothesis \((\mathcal{H}_{4})\) confirms the existence of a subsequence \(\{ y_{\jmath _{s}} \}_{s\geq 1}\) of \(\{ y_{\jmath}\}\) satisfying
for all \(t\in I\). Thus, \(\phi (y_{\jmath _{s}}, y) \geq 1\) for all t, and accordingly it possesses the \((C_{\phi})\) condition. Hence, Theorem 3.3 allows that K possesses a fixed point which is a solution for the CHF-jerk inclusion (1). □
3.2 End point and jerk model (1)
Now, in the next place, by utilizing another theorem based on some other special multi-functions containing the AEP-property, we derive the second criterion guaranteeing the existence of solution for the supposed CHF-jerk problem (1).
Theorem 3.6
([42])
Consider \((A,\rho )\) as a complete metric space. Assume:
-
(1)
\(\psi \in \Psi \) is u.s.c along with \(\liminf_{t\to \infty}(t-\psi (t))>0\) for \(t>0\);
-
(2)
\(\mathbb{G} : A \to \mathcal{P}_{CL,BN}(A)\) admits the property
$$ H_{\rho}(\mathbb{G} y_{1},\mathbb{G} y_{2})\leq \psi \bigl(\rho (y_{1}, y_{2})\bigr), \quad \forall y_{1}, y_{2} \in A.$$
Then \(\mathbb{G}\) admits one and exactly one end point iff \(\mathbb{G}\) contains the AEP-property.
Theorem 3.7
Take \(\mathbb{G}:I \times A^{3} \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\). Assume that
- \((\mathcal{H}_{7})\):
-
There exists a nondecreasing and upper semi-continuous mapping \(\psi : \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0} \to \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}\) which satisfies \(\psi (t) \leq t\), \(\forall t>0\) and \(\liminf_{t \to \infty} (t - \psi (t)) \geq 0\);
- \((\mathcal{H}_{8})\):
-
Multifunction \(\mathbb{G}:I \times A^{3} \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\) is bounded and integrable such that the map \(\mathbb{G}( \cdot , y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}): I \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\) is measurable for all \(y_{m} \in A \) (\(m=1,2,3\));
- \((\mathcal{H}_{9})\):
-
There is a function \(\kappa \in {C}(I, [0, \infty ))\) s.t.
$$ {H}_{\rho} (\mathbb{G}(t, y_{1}, y_{2}, y_{3}), \mathbb{G}(t, \check{y}_{1}, \check{y}_{2}, \check{y}_{3} ) \leq \kappa (t) \varpi ^{\star} \psi \Biggl(\sum_{m=1}^{3} \vert y_{m} - \check{y}_{m} \vert \Biggr) $$(18)for all \(t\in I\) and \(y_{m}, \check{y}_{m} \in A \) (\(m=1,2,3\)), where
$$ \varpi ^{\star}= \frac {1}{\Xi _{1} + \Xi _{2} + \Xi _{3}}, \qquad \Xi _{m} = \Vert \kappa \Vert \check{\Lambda}_{m}\quad (m=1,2,3);$$ - \((\mathcal{H}_{10})\):
-
The AEP-property is valid for the multi-function K.
Then the CHF-jerk problem (1) has a solution.
Proof
We want to establish that the multifunction \(K: A \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) possesses an end point. Initially, we claim that \(K(y)\) is closed \(\forall y\in A\). As the multifunction
is both measurable and closed-valued for any \(y \in A\), so the \(\mathbb{G}\) has a measurable selection and \(S_{\mathbb{G}, y} \neq \emptyset \). By using the same procedure as that given in Theorem 3.5, it can be easily deduced that \(K(y)\) is closed-valued. Also, the compactness of \(\mathbb{G}\) ensures the boundedness of \(K(y)\). Next, assume that \(y, \check{y} \in A\) and \(\ell _{1} \in K(\check{y})\) and choose \(g_{1}\in S_{\mathbb{G}, \check{y}}\) such that
for all \(t\in I\). Also, for all \(y, \check{y} \in A\) and \(t\in I\), we have
There exists
such that
We give a mapping \(\digamma : I \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) by
for any \(t\in I\). Because \(g_{1}\) and
are measurable, thus
is too. Take
s.t. for all \(t\in I\) we get
Define \(\ell _{2} \in K(y)\) by
for any \(t\in I\). Using the same techniques that were employed in the proof of Theorem 3.5, we get that
We get
Hypothesis \((\mathcal{H}_{10})\) gives the approximate property for the end points of K. Hence, due to Theorem 3.6, \(\exists y_{*} \in A\) s.t. \(K(y_{*})= \{ y_{*} \}\). As a result, \(y_{*}\) is a solution of the CHF-jerk problem (1). □
4 Example
We give an example for simulating and analyzing the results numerically.
Example 4.1
We model the following CHF-jerk inclusion BVP by assuming the constant values \(\iota _{1}=0.5\), \(\iota _{2} = 0.7\), \(\iota _{3} = 0.99\) as
where \(t \in I :=[1,e]\), and we choose \(\eta =2.69 \in (1,e)\). Now, consider the multi-function \(\mathbb{G}:I \times A^{3} \to \mathcal{P}_{CP}(A)\) defined by
where
Some calculations, by the above data and using (13), give \(F_{1}^{*}=3\),
\(F_{1}^{**}= 2 \Gamma (1.99)= 1.991626\),
\(F_{1}^{***}=0\),
and
For each \(y_{m}, \bar{y}_{m} \in \mathbb{R} \) (\(m=1,2,3\)), we have
Hence, from the above, it is found a function \(\kappa \in {C}(I, [0, \infty ))\) as \(\kappa (t)=\frac {t}{2}\) for all \(t\in I = [1,e]\). Then
Next, define \(\psi : [0, \infty ) \to [0, \infty )\) by \(\psi (t) = \frac {t}{2}\) for (a.e.) \(t >0\). It is simple to verify that
and \(\psi (t) < t\) for all \(t >0\). Also, we obtain
in which
Thus
for all \(t\in I\). In the sequel, we regard the multi-function \(K: A \to \mathcal{P}(A)\) by
for which
where
One can see the results of \(F_{1}(t)\), \(F_{2}(t)\) for \(t \in [1, e]\) in Table 1 and can see a graphical representation of them in Fig. 1. As the multi-function K possesses an approximate end point property, hence by using Theorem 3.7, the supposed CHF-jerk problem (19) admits a solution.
5 Conclusion
In this research work, a generalization of the standard jerk equation in the context of the Caputo–Hadamard differential inclusion (1) was provided, in which we used some inequalities and important properties of multi-valued functions in the framework of the special contractions and admissible mappings. We extracted existence properties of solutions of the mentioned inclusion (1) by applying two different notions of fixed points and end points in functional analysis. This type of the Caputo–Hadamard structure for a jerk problem is a newly-defined FBVP, and we tried to establish our results based on some new non-routine techniques of fixed point and end point theories. With the help of an example, we described our method numerically and graphically. Due to the importance of jerk in the modern physics, it is necessary that we continue our study on the extended models of such physical structures and investigate other qualitative properties of them.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Thabet, S.T.M., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: On a new structure of the pantograph inclusion problem in the Caputo conformable setting. Bound. Value Probl. 2020, 171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01468-4
Baleanu, D., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: A hybrid Caputo fractional modeling for thermostat with hybrid boundary value conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2020, 64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01361-0
Samei, M.E., Rezapour, S.: On a fractional q-differential inclusion on a time scale via endpoints and numerical calculations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 460 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02923-3
Rezapour, S., Ahmad, B., Etemad, S.: On the new fractional configurations of integro-differential Langevin boundary value problems. Alex. Eng. J. 60(5), 4865–4873 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.03.070
Jleli, M., Samet, B., Vetro, C.: Nonexistence results for higher order fractional differential inequalities with nonlinearities involving Caputo fractional derivative. Mathematics 9, 1866 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161866
Mohammadi, H., Kumar, S., Rezapour, S., Etemad, S.: A theoretical study of the Caputo-Fabrizio fractional modeling for hearing loss due to Mumps virus with optimal control. Chaos Solitons Fractals 144, 110668 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110668
Rezapour, S., Imran, A., Hussain, A., Martinez, F., Etemad, S., Kaabar, M.K.A.: Condensing functions and approximate endpoint criterion for the existence analysis of quantum integro-difference FBVPs. Symmetry 13(3), 469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13030469
Matar, M.M., Abbas, M.I., Alzabut, J., Kaabar, M.K.A., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: Investigation of the p-Laplacian nonperiodic nonlinear boundary value problem via generalized Caputo fractional derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 68 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03228-9
Thabet, S.T.M., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: On a coupled Caputo conformable system of pantograph problems. Turk. J. Math. 45(1), 496–519 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-2010-70
Baleanu, D., Jajarmi, A., Mohammadi, H., Rezapour, S.: A new study on the mathematical modelling of human liver with Caputo-Fabrizio fractional derivative. Chaos Solitons Fractals 134, 109705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109705
Baleanu, D., Etemad, S., Rezapour, S.: On a fractional hybrid integro-differential equation with mixed hybrid integral boundary value conditions by using three operators. Alex. Eng. J. 59(5), 3019–3027 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.053
Baleanu, D., Mohammadi, H., Rezapour, S.: Analysis of the model of HIV-1 infection of \(CD4^{+}\) T-cell with a new approach of fractional derivative. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-02544-w
Baleanu, D., Rezapour, S., Saberpour, Z.: On fractional integro-differential inclusions via the extended fractional Caputo-Fabrizio derivation. Bound. Value Probl. 2019, 79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-019-1194-0
Aydogan, S.M., Baleanu, D., Mousalou, A., Rezapour, S.: On high order fractional integro-differential equations including the Caputo-Fabrizio derivative. Bound. Value Probl. 2018, 90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-018-1008-9
Haghi, R.H., Rezapour, S.: Fixed points of multifunctions on regular cone metric spaces. Expo. Math. 28(1), 71–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2009.04.001
Baleanu, D., Mohammadi, H., Rezapour, S.: On a nonlinear fractional differential equation on partially ordered metric spaces. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 83 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-83
Ahmad, B., Ntouyas, S.K., Tariboon, J.: A study of mixed Hadamard and Riemann-Liouville fractional integro-differential inclusions via endpoint theory. Appl. Math. Lett. 52, 9–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2015.08.002
Ahmad, B., Ntouyas, S.K.: Existence and uniqueness of solutions for Caputo-Hadamard sequential fractional order neutral functional differential equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2017, 36, 1–11 (2017)
Aljoudi, S., Ahmad, B., Alsaedi, A.: Existence and uniqueness results for a coupled system of Caputo-Hadamard fractional differential equations with nonlocal Hadamard type integral boundary conditions. Fractal Fract. 4, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract4020013
Ledesma, C.T., Rodríguez, J.A., da C. Sousa, J.V.: Differential equations with fractional derivatives with fixed memory length. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12215-021-00713-8
Jleli, M., Samet, B., Vetro, C.: On the critical behavior for inhomogeneous wave inequalities with Hardy potential in an exterior domain. Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10(1), 1267–1283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/anona-2020-0181
Jarad, F., Baleanu, D., Abdeljawad, T.: Caputo-type modification of the Hadamard fractional derivatives. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2012-142
Salem, A., Mshary, N., El-Shahed, M., Alzahrani, F.: Compact and noncompact solutions to generalized Sturm-Liouville and Langevin equation with Caputo-Hadamard fractional derivative. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, Article ID 9995969, 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9995969
Nagy, A.M., Ben Makhlouf, A., Alsenafi, A., Alazemi, F.: Combination synchronization of fractional systems involving the Caputo-Hadamard derivative. Mathematics 9(21), 2781 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9212781
Liu, Y., Zhu, Y., Lu, Z.: On Caputo-Hadamard uncertain fractional differential equations. Chaos Solitons Fractals 146, 10894 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110894
Barakat, M.A., Soliman, A.H., Hyder, A.: Langevin equations with generalized proportional Hadamard-Caputo fractional derivative. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2021, Article ID 6316477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6316477
Kengne, J., Negou, A.N., Tchiotsop, D.: Antimonotonicity, chaos and multiple attractors in a novel autonomous memristor-based Jerk circuit. Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 2589–2608 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3397-1
Kengne, J., Njitacke, Z.T., Fotsin, H.B.: Dynamical analysis of a simple autonomous Jerk system with multiple attractors. Nonlinear Dyn. 83, 751–765 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-015-2364-y
Das, A., Suwan, T., Deuri, B.C., Abdeljawad, T.: On solution of generalized proportional fractional integral via a new fixed point theorem. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03589-1
Ali, A., Gupta, V., Abdeljawad, T., Shah, K., Jarad, F.: Mathematical analysis of nonlocal implicit impulsive problem under Caputo fractional boundary conditions. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7681479
Mottaghi, F., Li, C., Abdeljawad, T., Saadati, R., Ghaemi, M.B.: Existence and Kummer stability for a system of nonlinear ϕ-Hilfer fractional differential equations with application. Fractal Fract. 5(4), 200 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040200
Ahmad, B., Alghamdi, N., Alsaedi, A., Ntouyas, S.K.: Existence theory for a system of coupled multi-term fractional differential equations with integral multi-strip coupled boundary conditions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 44(3), 2325–2342 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5788
Sudsutad, W., Ntouyas, S.K., Thaiprayoon, C.: Nonlocal coupled system for ψ-Hilfer fractional order Langevin equations. AIMS Math. 6(9), 9731–9756 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2021566
Ntouyas, S.K., Sitho, S., Khoployklang, T., Tariboon, J.: Sequential Riemann-Liouville and Hadamard-Caputo fractional differential equation with iterated fractional integrals conditions. Axioms 10(4), 277 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040277
Soontharanon, J., Sitthiwirattham, T.: On sequential fractional Caputo \((p,q)\)-integrodifference equations via three-point fractional Riemann-Liouville \((p,q)\)-difference boundary condition. AIMS Math. 7(1), 704–722 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022044
Rezapour, S., Samei, M.E.: On the existence of solutions for a multi-singular pointwise defined fractional q-integro-differential equation. Bound. Value Probl. 2020, 38 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01342-3
Samei, M.E., Rezapour, S.: On a system of fractional q-differential inclusions via sum of two multi-term functions on a time scale. Bound. Value Probl. 2020, 135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-020-01433-1
Abdeljawad, T., Samei, M.E.: Applying quantum calculus for the existence of solution of q-integro-differential equations with three criteria. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. S 14(10), 3351–3386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2020440
Dumrongpokaphan, T., Patanarapeelert, N., Sitthiwirattham, T.: Nonlocal Neumann boundary value problem for fractional symmetric Hahn integrodifference equations. Symmetry 13(12), 2303 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13122303
Aljoudi, S., Ahmad, B., Nieto, J.J., Alsaedi, A.: A coupled system of Hadamard type sequential fractional differential equations with coupled strip conditions. Chaos Solitons Fractals 91, 39–46 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.05.005
Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M., Trujillo, J.J.: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Amini-Harandi, A.: Endpoints of set-valued contractions in metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 72(1), 132–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2009.06.074
Mohammadi, B., Rezapour, S., Shahzad, N.: Some results on fixed points of α-ψ-Ciric generalized multifunctions. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013, 24 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1812-2013-24
Samet, B., Vetro, C., Vetro, P.: Fixed point theorems for α-ψ-contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 75(4), 2154–2165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.10.014
Acknowledgements
J. Alzabut is thankful to Prince Sultan University and OSTİM Technical University for their endless support throughout this work. The first and fourth authors were supported by Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University. The third author was supported by Bu-Ali Sina University.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SE: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, and initial draft. II: Actualization, validation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and initial draft. MES: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, software, simulation, initial draft, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. SR: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, initial draft, and supervision of the original draft and editing. JA: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, and initial draft. WS: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, and initial draft. IG: Actualization, methodology, formal analysis, validation, investigation, and initial draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Appendix: Supplement
Appendix: Supplement
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Etemad, S., Iqbal, I., Samei, M.E. et al. Some inequalities on multi-functions for applying in the fractional Caputo–Hadamard jerk inclusion system. J Inequal Appl 2022, 84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02819-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02819-8