- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On new generalized \(\theta _{b}\)-contractions and related fixed point theorems
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2022, Article number: 37 (2022)
Abstract
The manuscript is an extension of the investigations concerning θ-contractions which have been newly proposed in (Jleli and Samet in J. Inequal. Appl. 2014:38, 2014). The authors generalize the notion of θ-contractions to the case of nonlinear \(\theta _{b} \)-contraction mappings and prove multi-valued fixed point theorems based on the b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function in b-metric spaces. The manuscript consists of a tangible example which displays the motivation for such investigations. The work is compiled by the application of the proposed nonlinear \(\theta _{b}\)-contractions to Liouville–Caputo fractional differential equations.
1 Introduction
The Banach fixed point (or contraction) theorem is one of the most useful tools in functional analysis and its applications. It states conditions sufficient for the existence and uniqueness of a fixed point, and the theorem also provides an iterative system by which we can approximate to the fixed point and error bounds. This classical result of Banach has been described in different classes of distance spaces. In 1969, Nadler [19] generalized the concept of contraction theorem based on multi-valued mappings. He used the Hausdorff metric on it. Following the module of distance spaces, a number of authors have extended several results in this direction (see [1–30]). In 2007, Proinov [22] extended a contraction theorem with high order of iterative convergence of successive approximation by a new approach of contractive condition with respect to gauge function, high order of gauge function, and Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function.
In 1989 Bakhtin [6] and in 1993 Czerwik [12] generalized for the first time the concept of metric space by reorganizing just the triangle inequality and called it a b-metric space. After that, Aydi et al. in [5] constituted common fixed point theorems for single-valued and set-valued contractions gratifying a weak structure of φ-contraction in b-metric spaces (see [8, 13–15, 20]).
In 2012 Wardowski [27] developed the concept of new contraction mappings named F-contraction and proved some fixed point theorems, which were a generalization of the contraction theorem. In the recent time, Jleli and Samet [17] provided the idea of a new class contraction called θ-contraction, which is a new aspect of the contraction theorem in the associated approach.
2 Preliminaries
Firstly, we recall the Hausdorff–Pompeiu b-metric and some basic manners of b-metric space for the main sequel.
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) be a b-metric space. For \(\kappa \in \Gamma \), \(A\subseteq \Gamma \) and let \(\eth _{b} ( \kappa,\Omega _{1} ) =\inf \{ \eth ( \kappa,y ):y\in \Omega _{2} \} \). Define a mapping \(\hat{H}_{b}:CB ( \Gamma ) \times CB ( \Gamma ) \rightarrow [ 0,+\infty ) \) by
for all \(\Omega _{1},\Omega _{2}\in CB ( \Gamma ) \). Then \(\hat{H}_{b}\) is known as Hausdorff–Pompeiu b-metric induced by ð on \(CB ( \Gamma ) \), where \(CB ( \Gamma ) \) is the class of all nonempty closed and bounded subsets of Γ. A point \(\kappa \in \Gamma \) is called a fixed point of \(\grave{I}:\Gamma \rightarrow CL ( \Gamma ) \) such that \(\kappa \in \grave{I}\kappa \), where \(CL ( \Gamma ) \) is the class of all nonempty closed subsets of Γ. If for \(\kappa _{0}\in \Gamma \) there is \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) in Γ such that \(\kappa _{i}\in \grave{I}\kappa _{i-1}\), then \(O(\grave{I},\kappa _{0})=\{\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2},\ldots\}\) is called an orbit of \(\grave{I}:\Gamma \rightarrow CL ( \Gamma ) \). A map \(f:\Gamma \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is called Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous if \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\in O(\grave{I},\kappa _{0})\) and \(\kappa _{i}\rightarrow \varrho \), which implies \(f ( \varrho ) \leq \liminf_{i}f ( \kappa _{i} ) \).
Definition 2.1
([12])
A b-metric space on a nonempty set M is a function \(b:\Gamma \times \Gamma \rightarrow R^{+}\cup \{ 0 \} \) such that for each \(\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3}\in \Gamma \) with \(s\geq 1\) being a given real number, if the following hold true:
(b\(_{\text{i}}\)) \(\eth ( \kappa _{1},\kappa _{2} ) =0\) if and only if \(\kappa _{1}=\kappa _{2}\);
(b\(_{\text{ii}}\)) \(\eth ( \kappa _{1},\kappa _{2} ) =\eth ( \kappa _{2}, \kappa _{1} ) \);
(b\(_{\text{iii}}\)) \(\eth ( \kappa _{1},\kappa _{3} ) \leq s[\eth ( \kappa _{1},\kappa _{2} ) +\eth ( \kappa _{2},\kappa _{3} ) ]\). The pair \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) is known as a b-metric space.
Example 2.1
([12])
Let \(\Gamma =L_{p} [ 0,1 ] \) be the space of all real-valued functions \(\kappa ( r ) \), \(0\leq r\leq 1\) such that \(\int _{0}^{1} \vert \kappa ( r ) \vert ^{ \frac{1}{p}}\,dr<+\infty \). Define \(b:\Gamma \times \Gamma \rightarrow R^{+}\) by \(b ( \kappa _{1},\kappa _{2} ) = ( \int _{0}^{1} \vert \kappa _{1} ( r ) -\kappa _{2} ( r ) \vert ^{p} ) ^{\frac{1}{p}}\), then \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) is known as a b-metric space with \(s=2^{\frac{1}{p}}\).
Lemma 2.1
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) be a b-metric space and \(\Omega _{1}\), \(\Omega _{2}\in CB(\Gamma )\) with \(\hat{H}_{b} ( \Omega _{1},\Omega _{2} ) >0\). Then, for every \(h>1\) and \(\kappa \in \Omega _{1} \), there is \(y=y ( \kappa ) \in \Omega _{2}\) such that
Lemma 2.2
([12])
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) be a b-metric space. For any \(\Omega _{1}\), \(\Omega _{2}\in CB(\Gamma )\) and any \(\kappa,y\in \Gamma \) such that
(i) \(\eth _{b} ( \kappa,\Omega _{2} ) \leq \eth ( \kappa,z ) \) for every \(z\in \Omega _{2}\);
(ii) \(\eth _{b} ( \kappa,\Omega _{2} ) \leq \hat{H}_{b} ( \Omega _{1},\Omega _{2} ) \);
(iii) \(\eth _{b} ( \kappa,\Omega _{1} ) \leq s[\eth ( \kappa,y ) +\eth _{b} ( \kappa,\Omega _{2} ) ]\).
Some other related recent developments are being recalled. Proinov [22] put forward the following concept.
Definition 2.2
Let \(i\geq 1\). The function ϑ: \(J\rightarrow J\) is called a gauge function of order i on J, where \(J=R^{+}\cup \{ 0 \} \), if the following conditions are satisfied:
(a) \(\vartheta ( \lambda \kappa ) <\lambda ^{i} \vartheta ( \kappa ) \) for each \(\lambda \in ( 0,1 ) \) and \(\kappa \in J\);
(b) \(\vartheta ( \kappa ) <\kappa \ \forall \kappa \in J- \{ 0 \} \).
Easily, we conclude that the first case of Definition 2.2 is equivalent to (i) \(\vartheta ( 0 ) =0\) and (ii) \(\vartheta ( \kappa ) /\kappa ^{i}\) is nondecreasing on \(J- \{ 0 \} \).
Definition 2.3
([22])
A gauge function ϑ: \(J\rightarrow J\) is called a Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function on J if
In view of the above observations, a Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function also satisfies the following functional equation:
Lemma 2.3
([22])
For given \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) (Λ is a closed subset of Γ) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\grave{I}\kappa _{0})\in J\) and \(\kappa _{i}\in \Lambda \) for some \(i\geq 0\). Then \(\eth (\kappa _{i},\grave{I}\kappa _{i})\in J\).
Definition 2.4
Let \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) and \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\grave{I}\kappa _{0})\in J\). Then, for each iterate \(\kappa _{i} ( i\geq 0 ) \in \Lambda \), define the closed ball \(\overline{b}(\kappa _{i},\rho )\) with center \(\kappa _{i}\) and center \(\rho >0\).
Lemma 2.4
If an element \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\grave{I}\kappa _{0})\in J\) and \(\overline{b} ( \kappa _{i},\rho ) \subset \Lambda \) for some \(i\geq 0\), then \(\kappa _{i+1}\in \Lambda \) and \(\overline{b} ( \kappa _{i+1},\rho ) \subset \overline{b} ( \kappa _{i},\rho ) \).
In light of the above hypothesis the structure of a b-metric space in the class of Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function ϑ proceeds as follows.
Definition 2.5
A nondecreasing function ϑ: \(J\rightarrow J\) is called a b-Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function on J if
where \(J=R^{+}\) and \(s\geq 1\). In light of the above observation, a b-Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function also satisfies the following functional equation:
Remark 1
Every b-Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function is also a Biachini–Grandolfi gauge function, but the converse may not be true in general. Furthermore, some definition of a gauge function in a b-metric space is the following:
where s is the coefficient of a b-metric space.
Example 2.2
(i) \(\vartheta ( \kappa ) =\frac{\lambda \kappa }{s}\) for each \(\lambda \in ( 0,1 ) \) is a gauge function of order 1 on \(\kappa \in J\);
(ii) \(\vartheta ( \kappa ) =\frac{\lambda \kappa ^{k}}{s} ( \lambda >0,k>0 ) \) is a gauge function of order k on \(J= ( 0,l ) \) where \(l= ( \frac{1}{\lambda } ) ^{\frac{1}{1-k}}\).
Definition 2.6
Suppose \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) and \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\grave{I}\kappa _{0})\in J\). Then, for every iterate \(\kappa _{i} ( i\geq 0 ) \in \Lambda \), we define the closed ball \(\overline{b} ( \kappa _{i},\rho _{i} ) \) with center \(\kappa _{i}\) and radius \(\rho _{i}=\sigma (\eth (\kappa _{i},\grave{I}\kappa _{i}))\).
From now on, Jleli and Samet [17] examined the idea of a θ-contraction as follows.
Theorem 2.5
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth ) \) be a complete metric space and \(\grave{I}:\Gamma \rightarrow \Gamma \) be a mapping. Suppose that there are \(\theta \in \Xi \) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that
where Ξ is the set of mappings \(\theta: ( 0,\infty ) \rightarrow ( 1,\infty ) \) that satisfy \(( \theta _{i} )\)–\(( \theta _{iii} ) \):
\((\theta _{i})\) θ is nondecreasing and right-continuous;
\((\theta _{ii})\) for all \(\{ s_{i} \} \) in \(( 0,\infty ) \), \(\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty }\theta ( s_{i} ) =1\) if and only if \(\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty } ( s_{i} ) =0\);
\((\theta _{iii})\) there are \(r\in ( 0,1 ) \) and \(\kappa \in ( 0,+\infty ] \) such that \(\lim_{s\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{\theta ( s ) -1}{s^{r}}=\kappa \). Then Ì has at least one fixed point.
Example 2.3
The functions \(\theta: ( 0,\infty ) \rightarrow ( 1,\infty ) \) defined by \(\theta _{1} ( r ) =e^{r}\), \(\theta _{2} ( r ) =e^{\sqrt{r}},\theta _{3} ( r ) =e^{re^{r}}\), \(\theta _{4} ( r ) =e^{\sqrt{re^{r}}}\), and \(\theta _{5} ( r ) =1+\sqrt{r}\) are in Ξ.
The main purpose of this manuscript is to introduce a new concept of \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction in a b-metric space, which is an extension of θ-contraction [17]. We prove multi-valued fixed point theorems via the b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function in the class of b-metric spaces. As our generalized results are based on b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function instead of the conventional operator, our newly proved works are the generalization of Ali et al. [2] and Proinov [22].
3 Main result
Further aspects of θ-contraction [17]. First, we give the following generalized definition.
We denote by \(\Xi _{b}\) the class of functions \(\theta _{b}: ( 0,\infty ) \rightarrow ( 1,\infty ) \) satisfying the following statements:
- \((\theta _{i})\):
-
\(\theta _{b}\) is nondecreasing;
- \((\theta _{ii})\):
-
for each \(\{ \kappa _{n} \} \subset ( 0,\infty ) \), \(\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty }\theta _{b} ( \kappa _{n} ) =1 \Leftrightarrow \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty } ( \kappa _{n} ) =0\);
- \((\theta _{iii})\):
-
there are \(r\in ( 0,1 ) \) and \(l\in ( 0,+\infty ] \) such that \(\lim_{\kappa \rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{\theta _{b}(\kappa )-1}{\kappa ^{r}}=l\);
- \((\theta _{iv} ) \):
-
\(\theta _{b}\) is right-continuous;
- \(( \theta _{v} ) \):
-
for each \(\{ \kappa _{n} \} \subset ( 0,\infty ) \) such that \(\theta _{b} ( s\kappa _{n} ) \leq [ \theta _{b} ( s\kappa _{n-1} ) ] ^{k} \ \forall n\in N\), \(s\geq 1\) and \(k\in ( 0,1 ) \), we have
$$\begin{aligned} \theta _{b} \bigl( s^{n}\kappa _{n} \bigr) \leq \bigl[ \theta _{b} \bigl( s^{n-1}\kappa _{n-1} \bigr) \bigr] ^{k}\quad\text{$\forall $}n \in N. \end{aligned}$$Before going to our main exposition, first we prove an auxiliary lemma for our main sequel.
Lemma 3.1
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a b-metric space and \(\{ \kappa _{n} \} \) be any sequence of Γ for which there are \(k\in ( 0,1 ) \) and \(\theta \in \Xi \) such that
Then \(\{ \kappa _{n} \} \) is a Cauchy sequence in Γ.
Proof
In view of the given hypothesis, we have
From (3), together with the equation \((\theta _{v})\), we write
Consequently, we obtain
Taking the limit as \(n\rightarrow \infty \) in (4), by appealing to \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\), we can write
In view of \((\theta _{ii})\), we have
Now, we examine that \(\{\kappa _{n}\}\) is a Cauchy sequence in Γ. Upon setting \(\delta _{n}:=\eth (\kappa _{n},\kappa _{n+1})\) and in light of \((\theta _{iii})\), there are \(r\in (0,1)\) and \(\kappa \in (0,\infty ]\) such that
Taking \(\lambda \in (0,\kappa )\) and from the definition of limit, there is \(n_{0}\in \mathbb{N}\) such that
Using (3) and in view of the above inequality, we obtain
which yields
Hence, there is \(n_{1}\in \mathbb{N}\) such that
Let \(p>n>n_{1}\). Then, using the triangular inequality and (6), we get
Based on the convergence of the series \(\sum_{j=n}^{\infty }\frac{1}{j^{1/r}}\), we get \(\{\kappa _{n}\}\) is a Cauchy sequence in Γ. □
We start with the following.
Definition 3.1
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a b-metric space, Λ be a closed subset of Γ, and ϑ be a Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on J. A mapping \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB ( \Gamma ) \) is called multi-valued \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction, if there is \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) such that, for \(\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \neq \emptyset \),
implies that
where
for each \(\kappa \in \Lambda \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \) with \(\eth ( y,\grave{I}\kappa ) \in J\), where \(k\in ( 0,1 ) \).
Remark 2
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a b-metric space and \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB ( \Gamma ) \) be a multi-valued \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction mapping satisfying (7) such that
Owing to \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\), we have
Theorem 3.2
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-metric space and \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB ( \Gamma ) \) be a multi-valued \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction. Suppose \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) such that \(\eth ( \kappa _{0},c^{\ast } ) \in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\cap \Lambda \). Then there is an orbit \(\{ \kappa _{i} \} \) of Ì in Λ and \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \Lambda \) such that \(\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty }\kappa _{i}=\vartheta ^{\ast }\). In addition, \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\) is a fixed point of Ì if and only if the function \(g ( \kappa ):=\eth ( \kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda ) \) is Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous at \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\).
Proof
Upon setting \(\kappa _{1}=c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{0})\cap \Lambda \). In the case that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1})=0\), then our proof of Theorem 3.2 proceeds as follows. Thus, we assume that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1})\neq 0\). On the other hand, we obtain
Define \(\rho =\sigma (\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1}))\). From (2), we have \(\sigma (r)\geq r\). Hence \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1})\leq \rho \) and so \(\kappa _{1}\in \overline{b}(\kappa _{0},\rho )\). Since \(\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1})\in J\), from (7) and (8) it follows that
By the right continuity of \(\theta _{b}\), there is a real number \(h_{1}>1\) such that
From Lemma 2.2, we can write
In the light of Lemma 2.1, there is \(\kappa _{2}\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{1})\cap \Lambda \) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2})\leq h_{1}H_{d}(\grave{I}(\kappa _{0}) \cap \Lambda,\grave{I}(\kappa _{1})\cap \Lambda )\). Due to \(( \theta _{i} ) \) and (10), this inequality gives that
where
Now, we claim that
Let \(\Phi =\max \{ \eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1}),\eth _{b}(\kappa _{1},\grave{I}(\kappa _{1})) \} \). If \(\Phi =\eth _{b}(\kappa _{1},\grave{I}(\kappa _{1}))\). Since \(\kappa _{2}\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{1})\cap \Lambda \), we have
which is a contradiction. Thus, we get \(\Phi =\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1}) \). We consider \(\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2})\neq 0\), otherwise our proof of Theorem 3.2 proceeds as follows. From Remark 2, we have \(\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2})<\eth (\kappa _{0},\kappa _{1})\) and so \(\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2})\in J\). Next, \(\kappa _{2}\in \overline{b}(\kappa _{0},\rho )\) because
Also, by appealing to the above hypothesis, we have
using (7), we have
Since \(\theta _{b}\) is right continuous, there exists a real number \(h_{2}>1\) such that
Further, from Lemma 2.2, we have
and by Lemma 2.1, there is \(\kappa _{3}\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{2})\cap \Lambda \) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3})\leq h_{2}H_{d}(\grave{I}(\kappa _{1})\cap \Lambda,\grave{I}(\kappa _{2})\cap \Lambda )\). By (13), this inequality gives that
where
Again, we claim that
Let \(\Phi =\max \{ \eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2}),\eth _{b}(\kappa _{2},\grave{I}(\kappa _{2})) \} \). If \(\Phi =\eth _{b}(\kappa _{2},\grave{I}(\kappa _{2}))\), since \(\kappa _{3}\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{2})\cap \Lambda \), we have
which is a contradiction. Thus, we get \(\Phi =\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2}) \). We consider \(\eth (\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3})\neq 0\), otherwise \(\kappa _{2}\) is a fixed point of Ì. From Remark 2 we have \(\eth (\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3})<\eth (\kappa _{1},\kappa _{2})\), and so \(\eth (\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3})\in J\). Also, we have \(\kappa _{3}\in \overline{b}(\kappa _{0},\rho )\) since
Continuing this set up, we have two sequences \(\{ \kappa _{i} \} \subset \overline{b}(\kappa _{0},\rho )\) and \(\{ h_{i} \} \subset (1,\infty )\) such that \(\kappa _{i+1}\in \grave{I}(\kappa _{i})\cap \Lambda \), \(\kappa _{i}\neq \kappa _{i+1}\) with \(\eth (\kappa _{i},\kappa _{i+1})\in J\) and
for all \(i\in \mathbb{N}\). It follows with \((\theta _{v}) \) that
Further, we obtain
which yields
By Lemma 3.1, \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(\overline{b} ( \kappa _{0},\rho ) \). Since \(( \kappa,\eth,s ) \) is complete and \(\overline{b} ( \kappa _{0},\rho ) \) is closed in Γ, there is \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \overline{b} ( \kappa _{0},\rho ) \) such that \(\kappa _{i}\rightarrow \vartheta ^{\ast }\). Note that \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \Lambda \), because \(\kappa _{i+1}\in \grave{I}\kappa _{i}\cap \Lambda \). Now, we claim that
or
for every \(i\in \mathbb{N}\). Based on the contrary there is \(i^{\prime }\in \mathbb{N}\) such that
and
By (17), we have
which implies
From which together with (18), we have
Since
by appealing to (7), we have
where
which yields
Let \(\Delta =\max \{ \eth (\kappa _{i^{\prime }},\kappa _{i^{ \prime }+1}),\eth (\kappa _{i^{\prime }+1},\kappa _{i^{\prime }+2}) \} \). If \(\Delta =\eth (\kappa _{i^{\prime }+1},\kappa _{i^{\prime }+2})\), since \(\kappa _{i^{\prime }+2}\in \grave{I}\kappa _{i^{\prime }+1}\cap \Lambda \), we have
which is a contradiction. Thus, we conclude that \(\Delta =\eth (\mu _{i^{\prime }},\mu _{i^{\prime }+1})\). From Remark 2, we have
From (18), (19), and (22), we obtain
which is a contradiction. Hence (15) holds true, that is,
In light of (23), we obtain
Moreover, \(\eth (\kappa _{i},\kappa _{i+1})\in E \ \forall i\). Thus, from (7) we have
where
implies
Let \(\Delta =\max \{ \eth (\kappa _{i},\kappa _{i+1}),\eth (\kappa _{i+1}, \kappa _{i+2}) \} \). If \(\Delta =\eth (\kappa _{i+1},\kappa _{i+2})\), since \(\kappa _{i+2}\in \grave{I}\kappa _{i+1}\cap \Lambda \), we have
which is a contradiction. Based on Remark 2, we can write
Taking limit as \(i\rightarrow +\infty \) in (25), we find
Since \(g(\kappa )=\eth _{b}(\kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda )\) is Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous at \(\sigma ^{\ast }\), then
Since \(\grave{I}\sigma ^{\ast }\) is closed, we have \(\sigma ^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\sigma ^{\ast }\). Conversely, if \(\sigma ^{\ast }\) is a fixed point of Ì, then \(g(\sigma ^{\ast })=0\leq \liminf_{i}g(\kappa _{i})\) since \(\sigma ^{\ast }\in \Lambda \). □
Corollary 1
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-metric space, ϑ be a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on J, and let \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) be a given set-valued mapping. If there exist \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that
for every \(\kappa \in \kappa \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \) with \(\eth (\kappa,y)\in J\). Suppose that \(\kappa _{0}\in \kappa s.t \eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\). Then there is an orbit \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) of Ì in Γ that converges to the fixed point \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \mathcal{F}=\{\kappa \in \Gamma:\eth (\kappa, \vartheta ^{\ast })\in J\}\) of Ì.
Corollary 2
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-metric space, ϑ be a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on J, and let \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) be a given set-valued mapping. If there are \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that
for each \(\kappa \in \kappa \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \) with \(\eth (\kappa,y)\in J\). Suppose that \(\kappa _{0}\in \kappa s.t \eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\). Then there is an orbit \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) of Ì in Γ that converges to the fixed point \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \mathcal{F}=\{\kappa \in \Gamma:\eth (\kappa, \vartheta ^{\ast })\in J\}\) of Ì.
Corollary 3
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-metric space, ϑ be a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on an interval J, and let \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) be a given set-valued mapping. If there are \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that, for \(\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \neq \emptyset \),
\(\forall \kappa \in \Lambda \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \) with \(\eth (\kappa,y)\in J\). Suppose \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda s.t \eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\cap \Lambda \). Then there exists an orbit \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) of Ì in Λ and \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \Lambda \) such that \(\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty }\kappa _{i}=\vartheta ^{\ast }\). Moreover, \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\) is a fixed point of Ì⇔, the function \(g(\kappa ):=\eth _{b}(\kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda )\) is Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous at point \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\).
Corollary 4
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-m.s and ϑ be a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on an interval J, and let \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) be a multi-valued \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction mapping. If there are \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that, for \(\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \neq \emptyset \),
implies that
where
for all \(\kappa \in \Lambda \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \), \(\sigma >0\) with \(\eth (\kappa,y)\in J\). Moreover, suppose \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\cap \Lambda \). Then there exists an orbit \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) of Ì in Λ, \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \Lambda \) such that \(\lim_{i\rightarrow \infty }\kappa _{i}=\vartheta ^{\ast }\) and \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\) is a fixed point of Ì⇔, the function \(g(\kappa ):=\eth _{b}(\kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda )\) is Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous at \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\).
Corollary 5
Let \(( \Gamma,\eth,s ) \) be a complete b-metric space and ϑ be a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on an interval J, and let \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) be a multi-valued \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction mapping. If there are \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) and \(k\in (0,1)\) such that, for \(\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \neq \emptyset \),
implies that
for all \(\kappa \in \Lambda \), \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \), \(\sigma >0\) with \(\eth (\kappa,y)\in J\). In addition, suppose \(\kappa _{0}\in \Lambda \) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\) for some \(c^{\ast }\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\cap \Lambda \). Then ∃ an orbit \(\{\kappa _{i}\}\) of Ì in Λ, \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\in \Lambda s.t \lim_{i\rightarrow \infty }\kappa _{i}=\vartheta ^{\ast }\) and \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\) is a fixed point of Ì⇔ the function \(g(\kappa ):=\eth _{b}(\kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda )\) is Ì-orbitally lower semi-continuous at \(\vartheta ^{\ast }\).
Example 3.1
Let \(\Gamma = [ -10,+\infty ) \) be an b-metric ð defined by \(\eth (\kappa,y)= \vert \kappa -y \vert ^{2}\) for every \(\kappa,y\in \Gamma \), and let \(J= ( 0,\infty ) \). Mapping \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) is defined as
Clearly, \(\frac{1}{2s}\min \{ \eth _{b}(\kappa,\grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda ),\eth _{b}(y,\grave{I}y\cap \Lambda ) \} <\eth ( \kappa,y) \Leftrightarrow \kappa,y\in {}[ 0,4]\). Let \(\kappa _{0}=4\), then we have \(c^{\ast }=\frac{1}{2}\in \grave{I}\kappa _{0}\) such that \(\eth (\kappa _{0},c^{\ast })\in J\). Firstly, we claim that Ì satisfies inequality (26) with setting \(\theta _{b}(r)=e^{\sqrt{re^{r}}}\), \(\vartheta (r)=\frac{r}{2}\), and \(k=\frac{1}{2}\). For \(\kappa \in {}[ 0,4]\) and \(y\in \grave{I}\kappa \), we obtain
Hence, the requirements of Corollary 1 are fulfilled and 0 is a fixed point of Ì. For \(\kappa =0\) and \(y=5\),
\(\forall \theta _{b}\in \Xi \) and \(k\in (0,1)\). Therefore, Corollary 1 cannot satisfied.
Example 3.2
Let \(\Gamma = \{ \kappa _{1},\kappa _{2},\kappa _{3} \} \) be a b-metric ð with coefficient \(s\geq \frac{D^{2}}{D^{2}-1}>1\) where \(D\geq 3\) is any positive integers defined by
The mapping \(\grave{I}:\Lambda \rightarrow CB(\Gamma )\) is defined as
Upon setting \(\vartheta (r)=r^{2}\) and \(\theta _{b}(r)=e^{\sqrt{re^{r}}}\), then ϑ is a b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function on the interval \(J= ( 0,\frac{1}{D-1} ] \) with coefficient \(\frac{D^{2}}{D^{2}-1}\) having order 2. Hence, in light of the above example it is easy to conclude that all conditions of Corollary 1 are satisfied.
4 An application
In this frame of study, we summarize by the application of the proposed nonlinear \(\theta _{b}\)-contractions to Caputo fractional derivatives. Some new aspects of Liouville–Caputo fractional differential equations (L.C.F.D.E) in the module of complete b-metric space are presented. Define the L.C.F.D.E based on order \(\kappa ( \check{D}_{ ( c,\kappa ) } ) \) by
where \(i-1<\kappa <i\), \(i= [ \kappa ] +1\), \(\alpha \in C^{i} ( [ 0,+\infty ] ) \), the collection \([ \kappa ] \) represents positive real number and Γ represents the gamma function. Let a b-metric space \(\delta _{\varsigma }:C ( I ) \times C ( I ) \rightarrow R^{+}\) be given by
with setting \(s=2\). Now, consider the following fashion of F.D.E and its integral boundary valued problem:
where \(g\in ( 0,1 ) \), \(\kappa \in ( 1,2 ] \) and
where \(I= [ 0,1 ] \), \(\beta \in C ( I,R ) \) and \(L:I\times R\rightarrow R\) is a continuous function. Let \(P:\Delta \rightarrow \Delta \) be defined by
for \(v\in \Delta \) and \(g\in [ 0,1 ] \). Now, we start the main result.
Theorem 4.1
Let \(L:I\times R\rightarrow R\) be a continuous function and nondecreasing on the second variable. There is \(\theta _{b}\in \Xi _{b}\) such that, for \(\varepsilon _{1},\varepsilon _{2}\in \Delta \), \(g\in [ 0,1 ] \), and \(\alpha \in [ 0,1 ) \),
implies that
where \(\Omega = \frac{ ( 2\kappa -1 ) ( \Gamma ( \kappa +1 ) ) }{2 ( 5\kappa +2 ) }\) and
Then equations (33) and (34) have precisely one solution, i.e., \(\varepsilon ^{\ast }\in \Delta \).
Proof
For each \(g\in I\) and owing to operator P, we write
which implies
which yields
So, we have
Therefore,
By (38), we have
Now, by contractive condition (7) with setting of \(\vartheta ( \varepsilon ) =1\) for all \(\varepsilon \in R\) and \(\theta _{b} ( \varepsilon ) =1+\sqrt{\varepsilon }\), we get
\(\forall \varepsilon _{1}\in \Lambda \), \(\varepsilon _{2}\in \grave{I}\kappa \cap \Lambda \) with \(\eth ( \varepsilon _{2},\grave{I}\varepsilon _{1} ) \in J\), where \(k\in ( 0,1 ) \). Thus, all the required hypotheses of Theorem 3.2 are satisfied, and we approached that equations (33) and (34) have at least one solution of P. □
Example 4.1
Let L.C.F.D.E be based on order \(\kappa ( \check{D}_{ ( c,\kappa ) } ) \) and its integral boundary valued problem
and
where \(\kappa =\frac{3}{2}\), \(\vartheta =\frac{3}{4}\) and \(L ( t,v ( t ) ) = \frac{1}{ ( g+3 ) ^{2}} \frac{ \vert \alpha ( g ) \vert }{1+ \vert \alpha ( g ) \vert }\). So, the above setting is an example of equations (3.3) and (3.4). Hence, clearly, equations (39) and (40) have at least one solution.
5 Concluding remarks
The paper deals with \(\theta _{b}\)-contraction in b-metric spaces, which is an extension of θ-contraction. We prove multi-valued fixed point theorems of some generalized contractions which are defined on b-metric spaces that satisfy a \(\theta _{v}\)-type condition. Our generalized results are based on b-Bianchini–Grandolfi gauge function instead of the conventional operator. Finally, we present an application dealing with the existence of solutions for Liouville–Caputo fractional differential equations.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Aleksic, S., Huang, H., Mitrovic, Z.D., Radenovic, S.: Remarks on some fixed point results in b-metric spaces. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 20, Article ID 147 (2018)
Ali, A., Işık, H., Aydi, H., Ameer, E., Lee, J.R., Arshad, M.: On multivalued θ-contraction maps and related applications. Open Math. 2020, Article ID 554 (2020)
Ali, A., Uddin, F., Arshad, M., Rashid, M.: Hybrid fixed point results via generalized dynamic process for F-HRS type contractions with application. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 538, Article ID 122669 (2020)
Ali, M.U., Kamran, T., Karapınar, E.: A new approach to α-ψ-contractive nonself multivalued mappings. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, Article ID 71 (2014)
Aydi, H., Bota, M.F., Karapinar, E., Moradi, S.: A common fixed point for weak φ-contractions on b-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory 13, 337–346 (2012)
Bakhtin, I.A.: The contraction mapping in almost metric spaces. Funct. Ana. Gos. Ped. Inst. Unianowsk 30, 26–37 (1989)
Banach, S.: Sur les operations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux ´equations integrales. Fundam. Math. 3, 133–181 (1922)
Benavides, T.D., Ramírez, P.L.: Fixed points for multivalued non-expansive mappings. Appl. Set-Valued Anal. Optim. 2, 143–157 (2020)
Berinde, V.: Generalized contractions in quasimetric spaces. In: Seminar on Fixed Point Theory, pp. 3–9. Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca (1993)
Ceng, L.C., Petrusel, A., Yao, J.C., Yao, Y.: Systems of variational inequalities with hierarchical variational inequality constraints for Lipschitzian pseudo contractions. Fixed Point Theory 20, 113–133 (2019)
Chanda, A., Dey, L.K., Radenović, S.: Simulation functions: a survey of recent results. RACSAM 113, 2923–2957 (2019)
Czerwik, S.: Nonlinear set-valued contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. Atti Semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena, 263–276 (1998)
Delfani, M., Farajzadeh, A., Wen, C.F.: Some fixed point theorems of generalized Ft-contraction mappings in b-metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Var. Anal. 5, 615–625 (2021)
Hu, P., Gu, F.: Some fixed point theorems of λ-contractive mappings in Menger PSM-spaces. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2020, 33 (2020)
Hussain, A.: Fractional convex type contraction with solution of fractional differential equation. AIMS Math. 5, 5364–5380 (2020)
Jleli, M., Karapinar, E., Samet, B.: Further generalizations of the Banach contraction principle. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, Article ID 439 (2014)
Jleli, M., Samet, B.: A new generalization of the Banach contraction principle. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, Article ID 38 (2014)
Mukheimer, A., Vujakovic, J., Hussain, A., Aydi, H., Radenoviv, S., Yaqoob, S.: A new approach to multivalued nonlinear weakly Picard operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, Article ID 288 (2019)
Nadler, S.B.: Set-valued contraction mappings. Pac. J. Math., 475–488 (1969)
Nazam, M., Hamid, Z., Sulami, H.A., Hussain, A.: Common fixed-point theorems in the partial b-metric spaces and an application to the system of boundary value problems. J. Funct. Spaces 2021, Article ID 7777754 (2021)
Pacurar, M.: A fixed point result for φ-contractions and fixed points on b-metric spaces without the boundedness assumption. Fasc. Math. 43(1), 127–136 (2010)
Proinov, P.D.: A generalization of the Banach contraction principle with high order of convergence of successive approximations. Nonlinear Anal. 67, 2361–2369 (2007)
Qawaqneh, H., Noorani, M.S., Shatanawi, W., Aydi, H., Alsamir, H.: Fixed point results for multi-valued contractions in b-metric spaces. Mathematics 7, Article ID 132 (2019)
Roshan, J.R., Parvaneh, V., Sedghi, S., Shobkolaei, N., Shatanawi, W.: Common fixed points of almost generalized \((\psi,\phi )s\)-contractive mappings in ordered b-metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013, Article ID 130 (2013)
Samet, B., Vetro, C., Vetro, P.: Fixed point theorem for α-ψ-contractive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 75, 2154–2165 (2012)
Vetro, F.: A generalization of Nadler fixed point theorem. Carpath. J. Math. 31, 403–410 (2015)
Wardowski, D.: Fixed points of a new type of contractive mappings in complete metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, Article ID 94 (2012)
Yao, Y., Liou, Y.C., Yao, J.C.: Split common fixed point problem for two quasi-pseudo-contractive operators and its algorithm construction. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2015, Article ID 127 (2015)
Yao, Y., Qin, X., Yao, J.C.: Projection methods for firmly type nonexpansive operators. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 19, 407–415 (2018)
Zoran, M.D., Parvaneh, V., Mlaiki, N., Hussain, N., Radenović, S.: On some new generalizations of Nadler contraction in b-metric spaces. Cogent Math. Stat. 7, 1–14 (2020)
Acknowledgements
The authors want to express their sincere thanks to the referee for his or her valuable remarks and suggestions, which made this paper more readable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AA was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. MA, AH, NH, and SMA performed the validation and formal analysis. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, A., Arshad, M., Hussain, A. et al. On new generalized \(\theta _{b}\)-contractions and related fixed point theorems. J Inequal Appl 2022, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02770-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-022-02770-8