- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Conditions for the validity of a class of optimal Hilbert type multiple integral inequalities with nonhomogeneous kernels
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2021, Article number: 64 (2021)
Abstract
For the Hilbert type multiple integral inequality
with a nonhomogeneous kernel \(K(\|x\|_{m, \rho }, \|y\|_{n, \rho })=G(\|x\|^{\lambda _{1}}_{m, \rho }/ \|y\|^{\lambda _{2}}_{n, \rho })\) (\(\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}> 0\)), in this paper, by using the weight function method, necessary and sufficient conditions that parameters p, q, \(\lambda _{1}\), \(\lambda _{2}\), α, β, m, and n should satisfy to make the inequality hold for some constant M are established, and the expression formula of the best constant factor is also obtained. Finally, their applications in operator boundedness and operator norm are also considered, and the norms of several integral operators are discussed.
1 Introduction and preparatory knowledge
Let \(k \in \mathbb{N}=\{1, 2, 3, \ldots \}\), \(\rho >0\), \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{k})\), \(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{k}=\{x= (x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{k} ) : x_{i}>0, i=1,2, \ldots , k\}\), \(\|x\|_{k,\rho }= (x_{1}^{\rho }+x_{2}^{\rho }+\cdots +x_{k}^{\rho } )^{1 / \rho }\). Define
In this paper, for a class of nonhomogeneous kernels \(K(\|x\|_{m, \rho }, \|y\|_{n, \rho })=G(\|x\|^{\lambda _{1}}_{m, \rho }/ \|y\|^{\lambda _{2}}_{n, \rho })\) (\(\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}>0\)), we discuss the equivalent parameter conditions for the validity of Hilbert type multiple integral inequality
That is, what conditions do parameters \(\lambda _{1}\), \(\lambda _{2}\), p, q, α, β satisfy to make (1) hold? On the contrary, what conditions do the parameters satisfy when (1) holds? Meanwhile, the best constant factor and its application in operator theory are also considered.
In [1], we studied the necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of Hilbert type multiple integral inequalities with kernel \(K(\|x\|_{m, \rho }, \|y\|_{n, \rho })=G(\|x\|^{\lambda _{1}}_{m, \rho } \|y\|^{\lambda _{2}}_{n, \rho })\) (\(\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}>0\)). The present paper is a supplement and improvement of [1], more relevant research can be referred to [2–20].
Lemma 1.1
([21])
Let \(p_{i}>0\), \(a_{i}>0\), \(\alpha _{i}>0(i=1,2, \ldots , n), \psi (u)\) be measurable. Then
where \(\Gamma (t)\) represents the gamma function.
By using Lemma 1.1, under the same conditions, it is not difficult to obtain: Let \(\varphi (u)\) be measurable, \(\rho >0\), \(n\geq 1\), \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots , x_{n}) \in \mathbb{R}_{+}^{n}\). Then
Suppose that \(K(u, v)=G(u^{\lambda _{1}}/{v^{\lambda _{2}}})\), then obviously \(K(u, v)\) satisfies the following property:
Lemma 1.2
Let \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1(p>1)\), \(\rho >0\), \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}\), \(K(\|x\|_{m, \rho }, \|y\|_{n, \rho })=G(\|x\|^{\lambda _{1}}_{m, \rho }/\|y\|^{ \lambda _{2}}_{n, \rho })\), \(\alpha , \beta \in \mathbb{R}\). Then
Moreover, if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\), then \(\lambda _{1}W_{1}=\lambda _{2}W_{2}\).
Proof
It follows from (2) that
(4) can be proved at the same time.
When \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\), notice that \(\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}>0\), we have
Thus \(\lambda _{1}W_{1}=\lambda _{2}W_{2}\). □
2 Main results
Theorem 2.1
Let \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1(p>1)\), \(\rho >0\), \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}\), \(\lambda _{1} \lambda _{2}>0\), \(\alpha , \beta \in \mathbb{R}\), \(K(\|x\|_{m, \rho }, \|y\|_{n, \rho })=G(\|x\|^{\lambda _{1}}_{m, \rho }/ \|y\|^{\lambda _{2}}_{n, \rho }) (\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}>0)\) be nonnegative measurable and
be convergent. Then
(i) If and only if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\), there exists a constant \(M>0\) such that
where \(f(x) \in L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m})\), \(g(y) \in L_{q}^{\beta } (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\).
(ii) When (5) holds, the best constant factor is
Proof
Let \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=c\).
(i) Suppose that (5) holds. We prove that \(c=0\). Consider the case of \(\lambda _{1}>0\), \(\lambda _{2}>0\). If \(c>0\), take \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and
Then
It follows that
But since \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\), we have \(\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}-\lambda _{1}\varepsilon >0\) and \(\int _{1}^{+\infty } u^{-1+\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}-\lambda _{1} \varepsilon } \,\mathrm{d} u=+\infty \), which is contradictory, hence \(c > 0\) is not valid.
If \(c<0\), take \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{-c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and
Similarly, we can get
Since \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{-c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\), we obtain \(\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}+\lambda _{1}\varepsilon <0\) and \(\int _{0}^{1} u^{-1+\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}+\lambda _{1}\varepsilon } \,\mathrm{d} u=+\infty \), this is still a contradiction, hence \(c< 0\) cannot hold.
To sum up, when \(\lambda _{1}>0\), \(\lambda _{2}>0\), we have \(c=0\), that is, \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\).
Moreover, consider the case of \(\lambda _{1}<0\), \(\lambda _{2}<0\). If \(c>0\), take \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and
Then, by calculation,
It follows that
Since \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and \(\lambda _{1}<0\), then \(\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}-\lambda _{1}\varepsilon <0\) and \(\int _{0}^{1} u^{-1+\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}-\lambda _{1}\varepsilon } \,\mathrm{d} u=+\infty \). This is a contradiction, therefore \(c > 0\) cannot hold.
If \(c<0\), take \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{-c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and
Similarly,
Since \(0<\varepsilon <\frac{-c}{\lambda _{1}\lambda _{2}}\) and \(\lambda _{1}<0\), we have \(\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}+\lambda _{1}\varepsilon >0\) and \(\int _{1}^{+\infty } u^{-1+\frac{c}{\lambda _{2}}+\lambda _{1} \varepsilon } \,\mathrm{d} u=+\infty \). That is still a contradiction, so \(c< 0\) does not hold either.
To sum up, when \(\lambda _{1}<0\), \(\lambda _{2}<0\), we still have \(c=0\), that is, \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\).
Conversely, if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\), set \(a=\frac{\alpha +m}{p q}\), \(b=\frac{\beta +n}{p q}\), it follows from Hölder’s inequality and Lemma 1.2 that
Arbitrarily take a constant M satisfying
then
Thus (5) holds.
(ii) Assume that there is a constant \(M_{0}\) satisfying
such that, for any \(f(x) \in L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m})\), \(g(y) \in L_{q}^{\beta } (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\), we have
Take sufficiently small \(\varepsilon >0\), \(\delta >0\), and set
It can be obtained by calculation that
Since \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\),
Consequently,
Let \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0^{+}\), and by using the famous Fatou lemma, we obtain
Let again \(\delta \rightarrow 0^{+}\), then
It follows that
This contradicts (6). Thus
is the best constant factor of (5). □
3 Applications in operator theory
Let \(p>1\), \(\rho >0\), \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}\), \(\alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), \(K(u,v)\) be nonnegative measurable. Define
Then T is a singular integral operator defined on \(L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m})\). Using this operator and according to Hilbert type integral operator theory, (5) is equivalent to
so we get the following.
Theorem 3.1
Under the same conditions as in Theorem 2.1, let the singular integral operator T be defined as in (7). Then
(i) T is a bounded operator from \(L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m})\) to \(L_{p}^{\beta (1-p)} (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\) if and only if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\).
(ii) When T is a bounded operator from \(L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m})\) to \(L_{p}^{\beta (1-p)} (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\), the operator norm of T is
Corollary 3.1
Let \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1(p>1)\), \(\rho >0\), \(\lambda >0\), \(\lambda _{1} \lambda _{2}>0\), \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}\), \(\alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), \(0< \frac{1}{\rho \lambda _{1}} ( \frac{m}{q}-\frac{\alpha }{p} )<\lambda \). Define a singular integral operator T by
Then \(T: L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m}) \rightarrow L_{p}^{\beta (1-p)} (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\) is a bounded operator if and only if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\). And when T is bounded, its operator norm is
where \(B(u,v)\) represents the beta function.
Proof
First, notice that
and
is equivalent to
Since
we have
According to Theorem 3.1, Corollary 3.1 holds. □
Corollary 3.2
Let \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}=1(p>1)\), \(\rho >0\), \(\lambda _{1}>0\), \(\lambda _{2}>0\), \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}\), \(\alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), \(-\lambda _{1}< \frac{m}{q}-\frac{\alpha }{p} <\lambda _{1}\). Define a singular integral operator T by
Then \(T: L_{p}^{\alpha }(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{m}) \rightarrow L_{p}^{\beta (1-p)} (\mathbb{R}_{+}^{n} )\) is a bounded operator if and only if \(\frac{n\lambda _{1}-\alpha \lambda _{2}}{p}+ \frac{m\lambda _{2}-\beta \lambda _{1}}{q}=0\), and when T is bounded, its operator norm is
Proof
Since \(-\lambda _{1}< \frac{m}{q}-\frac{\alpha }{p} <\lambda _{1}\), then \(\frac{m}{q}-\frac{\alpha }{p} +\lambda _{1}>0\) and \(\frac{m}{q}-\frac{\alpha }{p} -\lambda _{1}<0\), therefore
It follows that
Availability of data and materials
The data and material in this paper are effective.
References
Hong, Y., Huang, Q., Yang, B.: The necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a kind of Hilbert-type multiple integral inequality with the non-homogeneous kernel and its applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 316 (2017)
Hong, Y., He, B., Yang, B.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the validity of Hilbert type integral inequalities with a class of quasi-homogeneous kernels and its application in operator theory. J. Math. Inequal. 12(3), 777–788 (2018)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B., Raigorodskii, A.: On a half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality in the whole plane with the kernel of hyperbolic secant function related to the Hurwitz zeta function. In: Trigonometric Sums and Their Applications, pp. 229–259. Springer, Berlin (2020)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: On an equivalent property of a reverse Hilbert-type integral inequality related to the extended Hurwitz-zeta function. J. Math. Inequal. 13(2), 315–334 (2019)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: On a Hilbert-type integral inequality in the whole plane related to the extended Riemann zeta function. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 13(4), 1765–1782 (2019)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: On a Hilbert-type integral inequality related to the extended Hurwitz zeta function in the whole plane. Acta Appl. Math. 160(1), 67–80 (2019)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: Equivalent properties of a Hilbert-type integral inequality with the best constant factor related to the Hurwitz zeta function. Ann. Funct. Anal. 9(2), 282–295 (2018)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: A half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality in the whole plane related to the Riemann zeta function. Appl. Anal. 97(9), 1505–1525 (2018)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: A Hilbert-type integral inequality in the whole plane related to the hypergeometric function and the beta function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 428(2), 1286–1308 (2015)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: On a multidimensional Hilbert-type integral inequality associated to the gamma function. Appl. Math. Comput. 249, 408–418 (2014)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: A multidimensional half-discrete Hilbert-type inequality and the Riemann zeta function. Appl. Math. Comput. 225, 263–277 (2013)
Rassias, M.Th., Yang, B.: A multidimensional Hilbert-type integral inequality related to the Riemann zeta function. In: Applications of Mathematics and Informatics in Science and Engineering, pp. 417–433. Springer, New York (2014)
Yang, B., Liao, J.: Parameterized Multidimensional Hilbert-Type Inequalities. Scientific Research Publishing, USA (2020)
Yang, B.: On a more accurate multidimensional Hilbert-type inequality with parameters. Math. Inequal. Appl. 18(2), 429–441 (2015)
Cao, J., He, B., Hong, Y., Yang, B.: Equivalent conditions and applications of a class of Hilbert-type integral inequalities involving multiple functions with quasi-homogeneous kernels. J. Inequal. Appl. 2018, 206 (2018)
Yong, H.: A multidimensional generalization of Hardy-Hilbert’s integral inequality. Taiwan. J. Math. 12(2), 179–188 (2008)
He, B., Wang, Q.: A multiple Hilbert-type discrete inequality with a new kernel and best possible constant factor. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 431(2), 889–902 (2015)
Krnić, M., Vuković, P.: A class of Hilbert-type inequalities obtained via the improved Young inequality. Results Math. 71, 185–196 (2017)
Brevig, O.F.: Sharp norm estimates for composition operators and Hilbert-type inequalities. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 49(6), 965–978 (2017)
Tserendorj, B., Vandanjav, A., Azar, L.E.: A new discrete Hilbert-type inequality involving partial sums. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019 (2019) 127
Fichtingoloz, G.M.: A Course in Differential and Integral Calculus. People’s Education Press, Beijing (1957) (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the referee for his useful suggestions to reform the paper.
Funding
This work is supported by the Innovation Team Construction Project of Guangdong Province (2018KCXTD020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BH carried out the mathematical studies, participated in the sequence alignment, and drafted the manuscript. ZL and YH participated in the design of the study and performed the numerical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, B., Hong, Y. & Li, Z. Conditions for the validity of a class of optimal Hilbert type multiple integral inequalities with nonhomogeneous kernels. J Inequal Appl 2021, 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02593-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-021-02593-z
MSC
- 26D15
- 47A07
Keywords
- Nonhomogeneous kernel
- Hilbert type multiple integral inequality
- Parameter condition
- Boundedness of operator
- Operator norm