- Research
- Open access
- Published:
A double inequality for tanhx
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2020, Article number: 19 (2020)
Abstract
In this paper, we prove that, for \(x>0\),
This solves an open problem proposed by Ivády.
1 Introduction
Ivády (see [1, Problem 51]) proposed the following problem: Show that, for \(x>0\),
holds. Subsequently, a solution was presented by the proposer (see [2]).
In [2], the proof of the left-hand side of (1.1) is correct, but the proof of the right-hand side of (1.1) is not correct.
Using the inverse function of tanhx, the second inequality in (1.1) has the equivalent form
According to the mean-value theorem, Ivády [2, Eq. (8)] got on \([0, x]\)
for some \(0 < \eta< x\), and then proved that, for all \(\eta> 0\),
We note that (1.3) may be corrected as
for some \(0 < \eta< x\).
In this paper, we provide a proof of the right-hand side of (1.1).
The numerical values given in this paper have been calculated via the computer program MAPLE 13.
2 Lemma
Lemma 2.1
Let
Then, for \(x>0\),
Proof
We split the proof into three cases.
Case 1. \(0< x<0.5\).
We first prove the following inequalities:
and
for \(0< x<0.5\).
The inequality (2.3) can be converted to
We consider the function \(f_{1}(y)\) defined, for \(0< y<0.125\), by
Differentiation yields
By direct computation, we get, for \(0< y<0.125\),
We then obtain \(f'_{1}(y)<0\) for \(0< y<0.125\). Hence, \(f_{1}(y)\) is strictly decreasing for \(0< y<0.125\), and we have
The inequality (2.4) can be written for \(0< x<0.5\) as
In order to prove (2.6), it suffices to show that
where
Differentiation yields
We now prove \(f'_{2}(y)<0\) for \(0< y<0.125\). It suffices to show that, for \(0< y<0.125\),
It is not difficult to prove that
and
for \(0< y<0.125\) (we here omit the proofs). Hence, \(f'_{2}(y)<0\) holds for \(0< y<0.125\). So, \(f_{2}(y)\) is strictly decreasing for \(0< y<0.125\), and we have
for \(0< y<0.125\).
The inequality (2.5) can be written for \(0< x<0.5\) as
In order to prove (2.7), it suffices to show that
where
Differentiation yields
We now prove \(f'_{3}(y)>0\) for \(0< y<0.125\). It suffices to show that, for \(0< y<0.125\),
It is not difficult to prove that
for \(0< y<0.125\) (we here omit the proofs). Hence, \(f'_{3}(y)>0\) holds for \(0< y<0.125\). So, \(f_{3}(y)\) is strictly increasing for \(0< y<0.125\), and we have
for \(0< y<0.125\).
We then obtain by (2.3), (2.4) and (2.5), for \(0< x<0.5\),
Case 2. \(0.5\leq x \leq3\).
Let
where
and
It is not difficult to prove that
(we here omit the proof). Differentiating \(G_{1}(x)\) and using (2.10), we obtain, for \(x>0\),
Therefore, the function \(G_{1}(x)\) is strictly decreasing for \(x>0\).
Differentiation yields
Therefore, the function \(G_{2}(x)\) is strictly increasing for \(x>0\).
Let \(0.5\leq r \leq x \leq s \leq3\). Since \(G_{1}(x)\) is decreasing and \(G_{2}(x)\) is increasing, we obtain
We divide the interval \([0.5, 3]\) into 250 subintervals:
By direct computation we get
Hence,
This implies that \(G(x)\) is positive for \(0.5\leq x \leq3\).
Case 3. \(x>3\).
We first prove that, for \(x>3\),
which can be written for \(x>3\) as
which can be converted to
It is not difficult to prove that
and
for \(y>27\) (we here omit the proofs).
In order to prove (2.13), it suffices to show that
We consider the function \(f_{4}(z)\) defined, for \(z>3\sqrt{3}\), by
Differentiation yields, for \(z>3\sqrt{3}\),
Hence, \(f_{4}(z)\) is strictly increasing for \(z>3\sqrt{3}\), and we have
for \(z>3\sqrt{3}\). Hence, (2.14) holds for \(y>27\).
We now prove \(G(x)>0\) for \(x>3\). It is easy to see that
In order to prove \(G(x)>0\) for \(x>3\), it is enough to prove the following inequality:
where
Differentiating \(H(x)\) and using (2.11) yield, for \(x>3\),
Therefore, the function \(H(x)\) is strictly decreasing for \(x\geq3\), and we have
Hence, we have \(G(x)>0\) for all \(x>0\). The proof of Lemma 2.1 is complete. □
3 Proof of the right-hand side of (1.1)
It is sufficient to prove the following inequality:
Differentiating \(F(x)\) and using (2.2), we obtain, for \(x>0\),
where \(G(x)\) is given in (2.1). Therefore, \(F(x)\) is strictly increasing for \(x>0\), and we have
for \(x>0\). The proof is complete.
References
Cakić, N.P., Merkle, M.J. (eds.): Problem section. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Mat. 14, 111–114 (2003). http://pefmath2.etf.rs/files/123/problem_section.pdf
Cakić, N.P. (ed.): Problem section. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Mat. 16, 146–155 (2005). http://pefmath2.etf.rs/files/125/problem_section.pdf
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to this work. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, B., Chen, CP. A double inequality for tanhx. J Inequal Appl 2020, 19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-2289-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-020-2289-y