Open Access

Weighted almost convergence and related infinite matrices

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20182018:15

Received: 8 November 2017

Accepted: 27 December 2017

Published: 10 January 2018


The purpose of this paper is to introduce the notion of weighted almost convergence of a sequence and prove that this sequence endowed with the sup-norm \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{\infty}\) is a BK-space. We also define the notions of weighted almost conservative and regular matrices and obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for these matrix classes. Moreover, we define a weighted almost A-summable sequence and prove the related interesting result.


almost convergenceweighted almost convergenceregular matrix



1 Introduction and preliminaries

Let ω denote the space of all complex sequences \(s=(s_{j})_{j=0}^{\infty}\) (or simply write \(s=(s_{j})\)). Any vector subspace of ω is called a sequence space. By \(\mathbb {N}\) we denote the set of natural numbers, and by \(\mathbb {R}\) the set of real numbers. We use the standard notation \(\ell_{\infty}\), c and \(c_{0}\) to denote the sets of all bounded, convergent and null sequences of real numbers, respectively, where each of the sets is a Banach space with the sup-norm \(\Vert . \Vert _{\infty}\) defined by \(\Vert s \Vert _{\infty}=\sup_{j\in\mathbb {N}} \vert s_{j} \vert \). We write the space \(\ell_{p}\) of all absolutely p-summable series by
$$\ell_{p}= \Biggl\{ s\in\omega:\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \vert s_{j} \vert ^{p}< \infty\ (1\leq p< \infty) \Biggr\} . $$
Clearly, \(\ell_{p}\) is a Banach space with the following norm:
$$\Vert s \Vert _{p}= \Biggl(\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \vert s_{j} \vert ^{p} \Biggr)^{1/p}. $$
For \(p=1\), we obtain the set \(l_{1}\) of all absolutely summable sequences. For any sequence \(s=(s_{j})\), let \(s^{[n]}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}s_{j}e_{j}\) be its n-section, where \(e_{j}\) is the sequence with 1 in place j and 0 elsewhere and \(e=(1,1,1,\dots)\).

A sequence space X is called a BK-space if it is a Banach space with continuous coordinates \(p_{j}:X\to\mathbb {C}\), the set of complex fields, and \(p_{j}(s)=s_{j}\) for all \(s=(s_{j})\in X\) and every \(j\in \mathbb {N}\). A BK-space \(X\supset\psi\), the set of all finite sequences that terminate in zeros, is said to have AK if every sequence \(s=(s_{j})\in X\) has a unique representation \(s=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty }s_{j}e_{j}\).

Let X and Y be two sequence spaces, and let \(A=(a_{n,k})\) be an infinite matrix. If, for each \(s=(s_{k})\) in X, the series
$$ A_{n}s=\sum_{k}a_{n,k}s_{k}= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{n,k}s_{k} $$
converges for each \(n\in\mathbb {N}\) and the sequence \(As=(A_{n}s)\) belongs to Y, then we say that matrix A maps X into Y. By the symbol \((X,Y)\) we denote the set of all such matrices which map X into Y. The series in (1) is called A-transform of s whenever the series converges for \(n=0,1,\ldots \) . We say that \(s=(s_{k})\) is A-summable to the limit λ if \(A_{n}s\) converges to λ (\(n\to\infty\)).
The sequence \(s=(s_{k})\) of \(\ell_{\infty}\) is said to be almost convergent, denoted by f, if all of its Banach limits [1] are equal. We denote such a class by the symbol f, and one writes \(f\mbox{-}\lim s =\lambda\) if λ is the common value of all Banach limits of the sequence \(s=(s_{k})\). For a bounded sequence \(s=(s_{k})\), Lorentz [2] proved that \(f\mbox{-}\lim s =\lambda \) if and only if
$$\lim_{k\to\infty}\frac{s_{m}+s_{m+1}+\cdots+s_{m+k}}{k+1}=\lambda $$
uniformly in m. This notion was later used to (i) define and study conservative and regular matrices [3]; (ii) introduce related sequence spaces derived by the domain of matrices [46]; (iii) study some related matrix transformations [79]; (iv) define related sequence spaces derived as the domain of the generalized weighted mean and determine duals of these spaces [10, 11]. As an extension of the notion of almost convergence, Kayaduman and Şengönül [12, 13] defined Cesàro and Riesz almost convergence and established related core theorems. The almost strongly regular matrices for single sequences were introduced and characterized [14], and for double sequences they were studied by Mursaleen [15] (also refer to [1619]). As an application of almost convergence, Mohiuddine [20] proved a Korovkin-type approximation theorem for a sequence of linear positive operators and also obtained some of its generalizations. Başar and Kirişçi [21] determined the duals of the sequence space f and other related spaces/series and investigated some useful characterizations.

We now recall the following result.

Lemma 1.1


Let X and Y be BK-spaces. (i) Then \((X,Y)\subset B(X,Y)\), that is, every \(A\in(X,Y)\) defines an operator \({\mathcal{L}}_{A}\in B(X,Y)\) by \({\mathcal{L}}_{A}(x)=Ax\) for all \(x\in X\), where \(B(X,Y)\) denotes the set of all bounded linear operators from X into Y. (ii) Then \(A\in(X,\ell_{\infty})\) if and only if \(\Vert A \Vert _{(X,\ell_{\infty})}=\sup_{n} \Vert A_{n} \Vert _{X}<\infty\). Moreover, if \(A\in(X,\ell _{\infty})\), then \(\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert = \Vert A \Vert _{(X,\ell_{\infty})}\).

2 Weighted almost convergence

Definition 2.1

Let \(t=(t_{k})\) be a given sequence of nonnegative numbers such that \(\liminf_{k} t_{k}>0\) and \(T_{m}=\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}t_{k}\neq0\) for all \(m\geq1\). Then the bounded sequence \(s=(s_{k})\) of real or complex numbers is said to be weighted almost convergent, shortly \(f(\bar{N})\)-convergent, to λ if and only if
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=r}^{r+m-1}t_{k}s_{k}= \lambda\quad\mbox{uniformly in }r. $$
We shall use the notation \(f(\bar{N})\) for the space of all sequences which are \(f(\bar{N})\)-convergent, that is,
$$ f(\bar{N})= \Biggl\{ s\in l_{\infty}:\exists\lambda\in\mathbb {C} \ni \lim _{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=r}^{r+m-1}t_{k}s_{k}= \lambda\mbox{ uniformly in }r; \lambda=f(\bar{N})\mbox{-}\lim s \Biggr\} . $$
We remark that if we take \(t_{k}=1\) for all k, then (2) is reduced to the notion of almost convergence introduced by Lorentz [2]. Clearly, a convergent sequence is \(f(\bar{N})\)-convergent to the same limit, but its converse is not always true.

Example 2.2

Consider a sequence \(s=(s_{k})\) defined by \(s_{k}=1\) if k is odd and 0 for even k. Also, let \(t_{k}=1\) for all k. Then we see that \(s=(s_{k})\) is \(f(\bar{N})\)-convergent to \(1/2\) but not convergent.

Definition 2.3

The matrix A (or a matrix map A) is said to be weighted almost conservative if \(As\in f({\bar {N}})\) for all \(s=(s_{k})\in c\). One denotes this by \(A\in(c,f({\bar {N}}))\). If \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))\) with \(f({\bar{N}})\mbox{-}\lim As=\lim s\), then we say that A is weighted almost regular matrix; one denotes such matrices by \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))_{R}\).

Theorem 2.4

The space \(f(\bar{N})\) of weighted almost convergence endowed with the norm \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{\infty}\) is a BK-space.


To prove our results, first we have to prove that \(f(\bar{N})\) is a Banach space normed by
$$ \Vert s \Vert _{f(\bar{N})}=\sup_{m,r} \bigl\vert \Psi_{m,r}(s) \bigr\vert , $$
$$\Psi_{m,r}(s)=\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=r}^{r+m-1}t_{k}s_{k}. $$
It is easy to verify that (3) defines a norm on \(f(\bar{N})\). We have to show that \(f(\bar{N})\) is complete. For this, we need to show that every Cauchy sequence in \(f(\bar{N})\) converges to some number in \(f(\bar{N})\). Let \((s^{k})\) be a Cauchy sequence in \(f(\bar{N})\). Then \((s_{j}^{k})\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(\mathbb {R}\) (for each \(j=1,2,\dots\)). By using the notion of the norm of \(f(\bar{N})\), it is easy to see that \((s^{k})\to s\). We have only to show that \(s\in f(\bar{N})\).
Let \(\epsilon>0\) be given. Since \((s^{k})\) is a Cauchy sequence in \(f(\bar{N})\), there exists \(M\in\mathbb {N}\) (depending on ϵ) such that
$$\bigl\Vert s^{k}-s^{i} \bigr\Vert < \epsilon/3\quad \mbox{for all }k,i>M, $$
which yields
$$\sup_{m,r} \bigl\vert \Psi\bigl(s^{k}-s^{i} \bigr) \bigr\vert < \epsilon/3. $$
Therefore we have \(\vert \Psi(s^{k}-s^{i}) \vert <\epsilon/3\). Taking the limit as \(m\to\infty\) gives that \(\vert \lambda ^{k}-\lambda^{i} \vert <\epsilon/3\) for each m, r and \(k,i>M\), where \(\lambda^{k}=f(\bar{N})\mbox{-}\lim_{m} s^{k}\) and \(\lambda ^{i}=f(\bar{N})\mbox{-}\lim_{m} s^{i}\). Let \(\lambda=\lim_{r\to \infty}\lambda^{i}\). Letting \(i\to\infty\), one obtains
$$ \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k}-s^{i} \bigr) \bigr\vert < \epsilon/3\quad\mbox{and}\quad \vert\lambda^{k}- \lambda \vert< \epsilon/3 $$
for each m, r and \(k>M\). Now, for fixed k, the above inequality holds. Since \(s^{k}\in f(\bar{N})\), for fixed k, we get
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}\Psi_{mr}\bigl(s^{k}\bigr)= \lambda^{k} \quad\mbox{uniformly in }r. $$
For given \(\epsilon>0\), there exists positive integers \(M_{0}\) (independent of r, but dependent upon ϵ) such that
$$ \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k} \bigr)- \lambda^{k} \bigr\vert < \epsilon/3 $$
for \(m>M_{0}\) and for all r. It follows from (4) and (5) that
$$\begin{aligned} \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr}(s)-\lambda \bigr\vert =& \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr}(s)- \Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k} \bigr)+ \Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k} \bigr)-\lambda^{k}+ \lambda^{k}-L \bigr\vert \\ \leq& \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr}(s)-\Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k} \bigr) \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert \Psi_{mr} \bigl(s^{k} \bigr)- \lambda^{k} \bigr\vert + \bigl\vert \lambda^{k}-L \bigr\vert < \epsilon. \end{aligned}$$
This proves that \(f(\bar{N})\) is a Banach space normed by (3).

Since \(c\subset f(\bar{N})\subset l_{\infty}\), there exist positive real numbers α and β with \(\alpha<\beta\) such that \(\alpha \Vert s \Vert _{\infty}\leq \Vert s \Vert _{f(\bar{N})}\leq\beta \Vert s \Vert _{\infty}\). That is to say, two norms \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{\infty}\) and \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{f(\bar{N})}\) are equivalent. It is well known that the spaces c and \(l_{\infty}\) endowed with the norm \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{\infty}\) are BK-spaces, and hence the space \(f(\bar{N})\) endowed with the norm \({\Vert \cdot \Vert } _{\infty}\) is also a BK-space. □

We prove the following characterization of weighted almost conservative matrices.

Theorem 2.5

The matrix \(A=(a_{n,k})\) is weighted almost conservative, that is, \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))\) if and only if
$$\begin{aligned}& \sup \Biggl\{ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{T_{m}} \Biggl\vert \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert :m\in\mathbb {Z}^{+} \Biggr\} < \infty; \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}= \lambda_{k}\quad\textit{exists }(k=0,1,2,\dots) \textit{ uniformly in }r; \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}= \lambda\quad\textit{exists uniformly in }r. \end{aligned}$$


Necessity. Let \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))\). Since the sequences e and \(e_{k}\) both are convergent, so A-transforms of the sequences \(e_{k}\) and e belong to \(f({\bar{N}})\) and exist uniformly in r. It follows that (7) and (8) are valid. Let r be any nonnegative integer. One writes
$$\Phi_{mr}(s)=\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n} \alpha_{n}(s), $$
$$\alpha_{n}(s)=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{n,k}s_{k}. $$
It follows that \(\alpha_{n}\in c'\) for all \(n\in\mathbb {N}_{0}:=\mathbb {N}\cup\{0\}\) and this yields \(\Phi_{mr}\in c'\) (\(m\geq 1\)). Since \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))\),
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}\Phi_{mr}(s)=\Phi(s)\quad \mbox{exists uniformly in }r. $$
It is clear that \((\Phi_{mr}(s))\) is bounded for \(s=(s_{k})\in c\) and fixed r. Hence, by the uniform boundedness principle, \(( \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert )\) is bounded. For each \(p\in\mathbb {Z}^{+}\) (the positive integers), the sequence \(x=(x_{k})\) is defined by
$$ x_{k}= \textstyle\begin{cases} \operatorname{sgn}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}&\mbox{if }0\leq k\leq p,\\ 0&\mbox{if }k>p. \end{cases} $$
Then a sequence \(x\in c\), \(\Vert x \Vert =1\) and
$$ \bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(x) \bigr\vert =\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{k=0}^{p} \Biggl\vert \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert . $$
Therefore, we obtain
$$ \bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(x) \bigr\vert \leq \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert \Vert x \Vert = \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert . $$
Equations (9) and (10) give that
$$ \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{p} \Biggl\vert \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert \leq \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert < \infty, $$
it follows that (6) is valid.
Sufficiency. Let conditions (6)-(8) hold. Let r be any nonnegative integer, and let \(s_{k}\in c\). Then
$$\begin{aligned} \Phi_{mr}(s) =&\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k} \\ =&\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k}, \end{aligned}$$
which gives
$$\bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(s) \bigr\vert \leq\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty} \Biggl\vert \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert \Vert s \Vert . $$
It follows from hypothesis (6) that \(\vert \Phi_{mr}(s) \vert \leq B_{r} \Vert s \Vert \), where \(B_{r}\) is a constant independent of r. Thus we have \(\Phi_{mr}\in c^{\prime}\) for each \(m\geq1\), which gives that a sequence \(( \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert )\) is bounded for each nonnegative integer r. Hypotheses (7) and (8) imply that the limit of \(\Phi_{mr}(e_{k})\) and \(\Phi_{mr}(e)\) must exist for all nonnegative integers k and r. Since \(\{e,e_{0},e_{1},\dots\}\) is a fundamental set in c, it follows from [23, p. 252] that \(\lim_{m}\Phi_{mr}(s)=\Phi _{r}(s)\) exists and \(\Phi_{r}\in c^{\prime}\). Therefore \(\Phi_{r}\) has the following form (see [23, p. 205]):
$$\Phi_{r}(s)=\xi\Biggl(\Phi_{r}(e)-\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}\Phi _{r}(e_{k}) \Biggr)+\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}s_{k} \Phi_{r}(e_{k}), $$
where \(\xi=\lim s_{k}\). From (7) and (8), we see that \(\Phi_{r}(e_{k})=\lambda_{k}\) for a nonnegative integer k and \(\Phi_{r}(e)=\lambda\). Therefore, for each \(s\in c\) and a nonnegative integer r, we have
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}\Phi_{mr}(s)=\Phi(s) $$
with the following expression:
$$ \Phi(s)=\xi \Biggl(\lambda-\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \lambda_{k} \Biggr)+\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}s_{k} \lambda_{k}. $$
Since \(\Phi_{mr}\in c^{\prime}\), so it has the representation
$$ \Phi_{mr}(s)=\xi \Biggl(\Phi_{mr}(e)-\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}\Phi_{mr}(e_{k}) \Biggr)+ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}s_{k} \Phi_{mr}(e_{k}). $$
We observe from (11) and (12) that the convergence of \(\Phi_{mr}(s)\) to \(\Phi(s)\) is uniform since \(\lim_{m\to\infty }\Phi_{mr}(e_{k})=\lambda_{k}\) and \(\lim_{m\to\infty}\Phi _{mr}(e)=\lambda\) uniformly in r. Hence, A is a weighted almost conservative matrix. □

In the following theorem, we obtain the characterization of weighted almost regular matrices.

Theorem 2.6

The matrix \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))_{R}\) if and only if
$$\begin{aligned}& \sup \Biggl\{ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{T_{m}} \Biggl\vert \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert :m\in\mathbb {Z}^{+} \Biggr\} < \infty; \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}=0 \quad\textit{uniformly in }r~(k\in\mathbb {N}_{0}); \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}=1 \quad\textit{uniformly in }r. \end{aligned}$$


Necessity. Let \(A\in(c,f({\bar{N}}))_{R}\). We see that condition (13) holds by using the fact that A is also weighted almost conservative. Take \(e_{k},e\in c\). Then A-transforms of the sequences \(e_{k}\) and e are weighted almost convergent to 0 and 1, respectively, since \(e_{k}\to0\) and \(e\to1\). Hence \(e_{k}\in c\) gives condition (14) and \(e\in c\) proves the validity of (15).

Sufficiency. Let conditions (13)-(15) hold. It is easy to see that A is weighted almost conservative. So, for each \((s_{k})\in c\), \(\lim_{m\to\infty}\Phi_{mr}(s)=\Phi(s)\) uniformly in r. Thus we obtain from (11) and our hypotheses (13)-(15) that \(\Phi(s)=\xi=\lim s_{k}\). This yields A is weighted almost regular. □

We now obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for the matrix A which transform the absolutely convergent series into the space of weighted almost convergence.

Theorem 2.7

The matrix \(A\in(l_{1},f({\bar{N}}))\) if and only if
$$\begin{aligned}& \sup_{k,m,r} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert < \infty, \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}& \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}= \lambda_{k}\quad\textit{exists for each }k\in\mathbb {N}_{0} \textit{ uniformly in }r. \end{aligned}$$


Necessity. Let \(A\in(l_{1},f({\bar{N}}))\). Condition (17) follows since \(e_{k}\in l_{1}\). Let \(\Phi_{mr}\) be a continuous linear functional on \(l_{1}\) defined by
$$ \Phi_{mr}(s)=\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k}. $$
Then we have
$$ \bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(s) \bigr\vert \leq\sup_{k} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert \Vert s \Vert _{1}, $$
which yields
$$ \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert \leq\sup_{k} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert . $$
For any fixed \(k\in\mathbb {N}_{0}\), we define a sequence \(s=(s_{j})\) by
$$ s_{j}= \textstyle\begin{cases} \operatorname{sgn}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}&\mbox{if }j=k,\\ 0&\mbox{if }j\neq k. \end{cases} $$
Then we have \(\Vert s \Vert _{1}=1\) and
$$\bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(s) \bigr\vert = \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k} \Biggr\vert = \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert \Vert s \Vert _{1}, $$
$$ \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert \geq\sup_{k} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert . $$
We obtain from (18) and (19) that
$$ \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert =\sup_{k} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert . $$
Since \(A\in(l_{1},f({\bar{N}}))\), for any \(s\in l_{1}\), we have
$$ \sup_{m,r} \bigl\vert \Phi_{mr}(s) \bigr\vert = \sup _{m,r} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k} \Biggr\vert < \infty. $$
By using the uniform boundedness theorem, Equation (20) becomes
$$ \sup_{m,r} \Vert \Phi_{mr} \Vert =\sup _{k,m,r} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert < \infty. $$
This proves the validity of (16).
Sufficiency. Let conditions (16) and (17) hold, and let \(s=(s_{k})\in l_{1}\). In virtue of these conditions, we see that
$$ \lim_{m\to\infty}\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k}= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\lambda_{k}s_{k} \quad\mbox{uniformly in }r, $$
it also converges absolutely. Furthermore, \(\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k}\) converges absolutely for each m and r.
Let \(\epsilon>0\) be given. Then there exists \(k_{0}\in\mathbb {N}\) such that
$$ \sum_{k>k_{0}} \vert s_{k} \vert< \epsilon. $$
By condition (17), we can find some \(m_{0}\in\mathbb {N}\) such that
$$ \Biggl\vert \sum_{k\leq k_{0}} \Biggl[\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}- \lambda_{k} \Biggr]s_{k} \Biggr\vert < \epsilon $$
for all \(m>m_{0}\) uniformly in r. Now
$$\begin{aligned} \Biggl\vert \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \Biggl[ \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}- \lambda_{k} \Biggr]s_{k} \Biggr\vert \leq& \Biggl\vert \sum _{k\leq k_{0}} \Biggl[\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}- \lambda_{k} \Biggr]s_{k} \Biggr\vert \\ &{}+\sum_{k>k_{0}} \Biggl\vert \frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum _{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}- \lambda_{k} \Biggr\vert \vert s_{k} \vert \end{aligned}$$
for all \(m>m_{0}\) uniformly in r. By using Equations (22) and (23) and our hypotheses in the above inequality, we see that (21) holds, and hence the sufficiency part. □

Theorem 2.8

If the matrix A in \((l_{1},f({\bar {N}}))\), then \(\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert = \Vert A \Vert \).


Let \(A\in(l_{1},f({\bar{N}}))\). Then we have
$$\bigl\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A}(s) \bigr\Vert =\sup _{m,r} \Biggl\vert \frac {1}{T_{m}}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k} \Biggr\vert \leq\sup_{m,r}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \Biggl\vert \frac {1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}t_{n}a_{n,k} \Biggr\vert \vert s_{k} \vert , $$
which gives \(\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A}(s) \Vert \leq \Vert A \Vert \Vert s \Vert _{1}\). This implies that \(\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert \leq \Vert A \Vert \). Also, \({\mathcal{L}}_{A}\in B(l_{1},f({\bar{N}}))\) gives
$$\bigl\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A}(s) \bigr\Vert = \Vert As \Vert \leq \Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert \Vert s \Vert _{1}. $$
Taking \(s=(e_{k})\) and using the fact that \(\Vert e_{k} \Vert _{1}=1\) k, one obtains \(\Vert A \Vert \leq \Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert \). Hence we conclude that \(\Vert {\mathcal{L}}_{A} \Vert = \Vert A \Vert \). □

Definition 2.9

Let \(t=(t_{k})_{k\in\mathbb {N}}\) be a given sequence of nonnegative numbers such that \(\liminf_{k} t_{k}>0\) and \(T_{m}=\sum_{k=0}^{m-1}t_{k}\neq0\) for all \(m\geq1\). A sequence \(s=(s_{k})\) is said to be weighted almost A-summable to \(\lambda\in\mathbb {C}\) if the A-transform of sequence \(s=(s_{k})\) is weighted almost convergent to λ; equivalently, we can write
$$\lim_{m}\sigma_{mr}(s)=\lambda\quad\mbox{uniformly in }r, $$
$$\sigma_{mr}(s)=\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty }t_{n}a_{n,k}s_{k}. $$

In the applications of summability theory to function theory, it is important to know the region in which \(S=(S_{k}(z))\), the sequence of partial sums of the geometric series is A-summable to \(\frac {1}{1-z}\) for a given matrix A. In the following theorem, we find the region in which S is weighted almost A-summable to \(\frac{1}{1-z}\).

Theorem 2.10

Let \(A=(a_{n,k})\) be a matrix such that (15) holds. The sequence \((S_{k}(z))\) is weighted almost A-summable to \(\frac{1}{1-z}\) if and only if \(z\in R\), where
$$ R= \Bigl\{ z= \bigl(z^{k} \bigr):\lim_{m} \sigma_{mr}(z)=0 \textit{ uniformly in }r \Bigr\} . $$


One writes
$$\begin{aligned} \sigma_{mr} =&\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1} \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}S_{k}(z) \\ =&\frac{1}{T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k} \frac{1-z^{k+1}}{1-z} \\ =&\frac{1}{(1-z)T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}- \frac{z}{(1-z)T_{m}}\sum_{n=r}^{r+m-1}\sum _{k=0}^{\infty}t_{n}a_{n,k}z^{k}. \end{aligned}$$
Taking the limit as \(m\to\infty\) in the above equality and using condition (15), one obtains
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}\sigma_{mr}=\frac{1}{1-z} \quad \mbox{uniformly in }r $$
if and only if \(z\in R\). This completes the proof. □



This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. (130-694-D1435). The authors, therefore, gratefully acknowledge the DSR technical and financial support.

Authors’ contributions

The authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

Operator Theory and Applications Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia


  1. Banach, S: Théorie des opérations linéaires. Warsaw (1932) MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Lorentz, GG: A contribution to theory of divergent sequences. Acta Math. 80, 167-190 (1948) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. King, JP: Almost summable sequences. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 17, 1219-1225 (1966) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Candan, M: Almost convergence and double sequential band matrix. Acta Math. Sci. 34B(2), 354-366 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Karaisa, A, Karabiyik, U: Almost sequence spaces derived by the domain of the matrix \(A^{r}\). Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 783731 (2013) Google Scholar
  6. S̈onmez, A: Almost convergence and triple band matrix. Math. Comput. Model. 57, 2393-2402 (2013) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Başar, F, Çolak, R: Almost-conservative matrix transformations. Turk. J. Math. 13(3), 91-100 (1989) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Başar, F, Solak, I: Almost-coercive matrix transformations. Rend. Mat. Appl. (7) 11(2), 249-256 (1991) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Mohiuddine, SA: Matrix transformations of paranormed sequence spaces through de la Vallée-Pousin mean. Acta Sci., Technol. 37(1), 71-75 (2015) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirişçi, M: Almost convergence and generalized weighted mean II. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 93 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Karaisa, A, Özger, F: Almost difference sequence space derived by using a generalized weighted mean. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 19(1), 27-38 (2015) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Kayaduman, K, Şengönül, M: The space of Cesàro almost convergent sequence and core theorems. Acta Math. Sci. 32B(6), 2265-2278 (2012) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Kayaduman, K, Şengönül, M: On the Riesz almost convergent sequences space. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 691694 (2012) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Duran, JP: Infinite matrices and almost convergence. Math. Z. 128, 75-83 (1972) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Mursaleen, M: Almost strongly regular matrices and a core theorem for double sequences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 293(2), 523-531 (2004) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Başarir, M: On the strong almost convergence of double sequences. Period. Math. Hung. 30(3), 177-181 (1995) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Mursaleen, M, Edely, OHH: Almost convergence and a core theorem for double sequences. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 293(2), 532-540 (2004) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohiuddine, SA, Alotaibi, A: Almost conservative four-dimensional matrices through de la Vallée-Poussin mean. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 412974 (2014) Google Scholar
  19. Mohiuddine, SA, Alotaibi, A: Generalized almost convergence and core theorems of double sequences. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 152910 (2014) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohiuddine, SA: An application of almost convergence in approximation theorems. Appl. Math. Lett. 24, 1856-1860 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Başar, F, Kirişçi, M: Almost convergence and generalized difference matrix. Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 602-611 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Malkowsky, E, Rakocević, V: An introduction into the theory of sequence spaces and measures of noncompactness. Zb. Rad. (Beogr.) 9(17), 143-234 (2000) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Kantorovich, LV, Akilov, GP: Functional Analysis in Normed Spaces. Macmillan, New York (1964) MATHGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018