Skip to main content

Janowski type close-to-convex functions associated with conic regions

Abstract

The analytic functions, mapping the open unit disk onto petal and oval type regions, introduced by Noor and Malik (Comput. Math. Appl. 62:2209-2217, 2011), are considered to define and study their associated close-to-convex functions. This work includes certain geometric properties like sufficiency criteria, coefficient estimates, arc length, the growth rate of coefficients of Taylor series, integral preserving properties of these functions.

Introduction and definitions

Let \(\mathcal{A}\) be the class of functions f of the form

$$ f ( z ) =z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n}, $$
(1.1)

which are analytic in the open unit disk \(E= \{ z\in\mathbb{C} : \vert z\vert <1 \} \). Furthermore, \(\mathcal{S}\) represents the class of all functions in \(\mathcal{A}\) which are univalent in E.

The convolution (Hadamard product) of functions \(f,g\in\mathcal{A} \) is defined by

$$ (f\ast g) ( z ) =z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}a_{n}b_{n}z^{n},\quad z\in E, $$

where \(f(z)\) is given by (1.1) and

$$ g(z)=z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}b_{n}z^{n},\quad z\in E. $$

For two functions f and g analytic in E, we say that f is subordinate to g, denoted by \(f\prec g\), if there exists a Schwarz function w with \(w ( 0 ) =0\) and \(\vert w ( z ) \vert <1\) such that \(f ( z ) =g ( w ( z ) ) \). In particular, if g is univalent in E, then \(f ( 0 ) =g ( 0 ) \) and \(f ( E ) \subset g ( E ) \). For more details, see [2].

A function p analytic in E and of the form

$$ p ( z ) =1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}p_{n}z^{n} $$

belongs to the class \(\mathcal{P}[A,B]\) if and only if

$$ p ( z ) \prec\frac{1+Az}{1+Bz}, \quad -1\leq B< A\leq1. $$

This class was introduced and investigated by Janowski [3]. In particular, if \(A=1\) and \(B=-1\), we obtain the class \(\mathcal{P}\) of functions with a positive real part (see [4, 5]). The classes \(\mathcal{P}\) and \(\mathcal{P}[A,B]\) are connected by the relation

$$ p ( z ) \in\mathcal{P}\Leftrightarrow\frac{ ( A+1 ) p ( z ) - ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) p ( z ) - ( B-1 ) }\in\mathcal{P}[A,B]. $$

Now consider, for \(k\geq0\), the classes \(k-\mathcal{CV}\) and \(k-\mathcal{ST}\) of k-uniformly convex functions and corresponding k-starlike functions, respectively, introduced by Kanas and Wisniowska, respectively. For some details, see [68].

Consider the domain

$$ \Omega_{k}= \bigl\{ u+iv;u>k\sqrt{ ( u-1 ) ^{2}+v^{2}} \bigr\} . $$
(1.2)

For fixed k, \(\Omega_{k}\) represents the conic region bounded successively by the imaginary axis (\(k=0\)), the right branch of a hyperbola (\(0< k<1\)), a parabola (\(k=1\)) and an ellipse (\(k>1\)). This domain was studied by Kanas [68]. The function \(p_{k}\), with \(p_{k} ( 0 ) =1\), \(p_{k}^{\prime} ( 0 ) >0\) plays the role of extremal and is given by

$$ p_{k} ( z ) = \textstyle\begin{cases} \frac{1+z}{1-z}, &k=0, \\ 1+\frac{2}{\pi^{2}} ( \log\frac{1+\sqrt{z}}{1-\sqrt{z}} ) ^{2}, &k=1, \\ 1+\frac{2}{1-k^{2}}\sinh^{2} [ ( \frac{2}{\pi}\arccos k ) \arctan h\sqrt{z} ] ,& 0< k< 1, \\ 1+\frac{1}{k^{2}-1}\sin [ \frac{\pi}{2R ( t ) }\int _{0}^{\frac{u ( z ) }{\sqrt{t}}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x ^{2}}\sqrt{1- ( tx ) ^{2}}}\,dx ] +\frac{1}{k^{2}-1}, &k>1, \end{cases} $$
(1.3)

where \(u(z)=\frac{z-\sqrt{t}}{1-\sqrt{tz}}\), \(t\in(0,1)\), \(z\in E\) and t is chosen such that \(k=\cos h ( \frac{\pi R^{\prime}(t)}{4R(t)} ) \), with \(R(t)\) is Legendre’s complete elliptic integral of the first kind and \(R^{\prime}(t)\) is the complementary integral of \(R(t)\) (see [79]). Let \(\mathcal{P} _{p_{k}}\) denote the class of all those functions \(p ( z ) \) which are analytic in E with \(p ( 0 ) =1\) and \(p ( z ) \prec p_{k} ( z ) \) for \(z\in E\). Clearly, it can be seen that \(\mathcal{P}_{p_{k}}\subset\mathcal{P}\), where \(\mathcal{P}\) is the class of functions with a positive real part (see [4, 5]). For the applications and exclusive study of the class \(\mathcal{P}\), we refer to [1014]. More precisely

$$ \mathcal{P}_{p_{k}}\subset\mathcal{P} \biggl( \frac{k}{1+k} \biggr) \subset\mathcal{P}, $$

and, for \(p\in\mathcal{P}_{p_{k}}\), we have

$$ \bigl\vert \arg p ( z ) \bigr\vert \leq\frac{\lambda \pi}{2}, $$

where

$$ \lambda=\frac{2}{\pi}\arctan \biggl( \frac{1}{k} \biggr) . $$
(1.4)

Therefore, we can write

$$ p ( z ) =h^{\lambda} ( z ) ,\quad h\in\mathcal{P}. $$

Definition 1.1

([1])

A function p analytic in E belongs to the class \(k- \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \) if and only if

$$ p ( z ) \prec\frac{ ( A+1 ) p_{k}(z)- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) p_{k}(z)- ( B-1 ) }, \quad k\geq0, $$

where \(p_{k}(z)\) is defined by (1.3) and \(-1 \leq B< A\leq1\). Geometrically, the function \(p ( z ) \in k- \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \) takes all values in the domain \(\Omega_{k} [ A,B ] \), \(-1\leq B< A\leq1\), \(k\geq0\), which is defined as follows:

$$ \Omega_{k} [ A,B ] = \biggl\{ w:\operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( B-1 ) w(z)- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) w(z)- ( A+1 ) } \biggr) >k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) w(z)- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) w(z)- ( A+1 ) }-1\biggr\vert \biggr\} $$

or equivalently

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega_{k} [ A,B ] &= \bigl\{ u+iv: \bigl[ \bigl( B^{2}-1 \bigr) \bigl( u^{2}+v^{2} \bigr) -2 ( AB-1 ) u+ \bigl( A^{2}-1 \bigr) \bigr] ^{2} \\ &\quad >k^{2} \bigl[ \bigl( -2 ( B+1 ) \bigl( u^{2}+v^{2} \bigr) +2 ( A+B+2 ) u-2 ( A+1 ) \bigr) ^{2} \\ &\quad +4 ( A-B ) ^{2}v^{2} \bigr] \bigr\} . \end{aligned}$$

The domain \(\Omega_{k} [ A,B ] \) retains the conic domain \(\Omega_{k}\) inside the circular region defined by \(\Omega_{0} [ A,B ] =\Omega [ A,B ] \). The impact of \(\Omega [ A,B ] \) on the conic domain \(\Omega_{k}\) changes the original shape of the conic regions. The ends of hyperbola and parabola get closer to each other but never meet anywhere and the ellipse gets the shape of oval. When \(A\longrightarrow1\), \(B\longrightarrow-1\), the radius of the circular disk defined by \(\Omega [ A,B ] \) tends to infinity; consequently, the arms of hyperbola and parabola expand and the oval turns into ellipse.

Definition 1.2

([1])

A function \(f\in \mathcal{A}\) is said to be in the class \(k-\mathcal{CV} [ C,D ] \), \(-1\leq D< C\leq1\), if it satisfies the condition

$$ \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( D-1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( C-1 ) }{ ( D+1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( C+1 ) } \biggr) >k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( D-1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime } ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( C-1 ) }{ ( D+1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( C+1 ) }-1 \biggr\vert \quad ( k\geq0; z \in E ) , $$

equivalently, we can write

$$ \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{ \prime} ( z ) }\in k-\mathcal{P} [ C,D ] . $$

Definition 1.3

([1])

The class \(k- \mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \), \(-1\leq D< C\leq1\), is the family of all those functions \(f\in\mathcal{A}\) such that

$$ \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( D-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }- ( C-1 ) }{ ( D+1 ) \frac{zf^{ \prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }- ( C+1 ) } \biggr) >k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( D-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }- ( C-1 ) }{ ( D+1 ) \frac{zf ^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }- ( C+1 ) }-1 \biggr\vert \quad ( k\geq0; z\in E ) , $$

or equivalently

$$ \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }\in k- \mathcal{P} [ C,D ] . $$

These two classes were recently introduced by Noor and Malik [1].

Motivated by the recent work presented by Noor and Malik [1], we define some classes of analytic functions associated with conic domains as follows.

Definition 1.4

Let \(f\in\mathcal{A}\). Then \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) if and only if there exists \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \) such that

$$ \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf^{ \prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) } \biggr) >k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf ^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1 \biggr\vert \quad ( k\geq0 ) , $$

or equivalently

$$ \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }\in k- \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] , $$

where \(-1\leq D\leq C\leq1\) and \(-1\leq B< A\leq1\).

Definition 1.5

Let \(f\in\mathcal{A}\). Then \(f\in k-\mathcal{UQ} [ A,B,C,D ] \) if and only if, for \(-1\leq D< C\leq1\), \(-1\leq B< A\leq1\) and \(k \geq0\), there exists \(g\in k-\mathcal{CV} [ C,D ] \) such that

$$ \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) } \biggr) >k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime } ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g^{\prime} ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1 \biggr\vert , $$

or equivalently

$$ \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g^{ \prime} ( z ) }\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] . $$

It can easily be seen that

$$ f\in k\mathcal{-UQ} [ A,B,C,D ] \Leftrightarrow zf^{\prime} \in k \mathcal{-UK} [ A,B,C,D ] . $$
(1.5)

Special cases:

  1. i.

    \(0-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] =\mathcal{K} [ A,B,C,D ] \) and \(0-\mathcal{UQ} [ A,B,1,-1 ] = \mathcal{Q} [ A,B ] \), subclasses of close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions studied by Silvia and Noor, respectively, see [15, 16].

  2. ii.

    \(k-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] =k-\mathcal{UK}\) and \(k-\mathcal{UQ} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] =k-\mathcal{UQ}\), the class of k-uniformly close-to-convex and the class of k-uniformly quasi-convex functions studied by Acu [17].

  3. iii.

    \(k-\mathcal{UK} [ 1-2\beta,-1,1-2\gamma,-1 ] =k- \mathcal{UK} ( \beta,\gamma ) \) and \(k-\mathcal{UQ} [ 1-2 \beta,-1,1-2\gamma,-1 ] =k-\mathcal{UQ} ( \beta,\gamma ) \), the well-known class of k-uniformly close-to-convex and the class of k-uniformly quasi-convex functions of order β and type γ, see [18].

  4. iv.

    \(0\mathcal{-UK} [ 1-2\beta,-1,1-2\gamma,-1 ] = \mathcal{K} ( \beta,\gamma ) \) and \(0-\mathcal{UQ} [ 1-2 \beta,-1,1-2\gamma,-1 ] =\mathcal{Q} ( \beta,\gamma ) \), well-known classes of close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions of order β type γ, see [19, 20].

  5. v.

    \(0-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] =\mathcal{K}\) and \(0-\mathcal{UQ} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] =\mathcal{Q}\), the classes of close-to-convex and quasi-convex functions; for details, see [21, 22].

Throughout this paper, we assume that \(-1\leq D< C\leq1\), \(-1\leq B< A \leq1\) and \(k\geq0\) unless otherwise specified.

A set of lemmas

To prove our main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 2.1

([23])

Let \(p ( z ) =1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}p_{n}z^{n}\prec F ( z ) =1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}d_{n}z^{n}\) in E. If \(F ( z ) \) is univalent in E and \(F ( E ) \) is convex, then

$$ \vert p_{n}\vert \leq \vert d_{1}\vert ,\quad n\geq1. $$

Lemma 2.2

([1])

Let \(p ( z ) =1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_{n}z^{n}\in k- \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \). Then

$$ \vert c_{n}\vert \leq\bigl\vert \delta ( A,B,k ) \bigr\vert , $$

where

$$ \delta ( A,B,k ) =\frac{ ( A-B ) \delta_{k}}{2}, $$
(2.1)

and

$$ \delta_{k}= \textstyle\begin{cases} \frac{8 ( \cos^{-1}k ) ^{2}}{\pi^{2} ( 1-k^{2} ) }, &0\leq k< 1, \\ \frac{8}{\pi^{2}}, &k=1, \\ \frac{\pi^{2}}{4\sqrt{t} ( k^{2}-1 ) R^{2} ( t ) ( 1+t ) }, &k>1. \end{cases} $$
(2.2)

Lemma 2.3

([2])

Let f and g be in the class \(\mathcal{C}\) and \(\mathcal{S}^{ \ast}\), respectively. Then, for every function \(F ( z ) \) analytic in E with \(F ( 0 ) =1\), we have

$$ \frac{f ( z ) \ast g ( z ) F ( z ) }{f ( z ) \ast g ( z ) }\in\overline{\operatorname{co}} \bigl( F ( E ) \bigr) , \quad z\in E, $$

where “” denotes the well-known convolution of two analytic functions and \(\overline{\operatorname{co}}F ( E ) \) denotes the closed convex hull \(F ( E ) \).

Lemma 2.4

([1])

Let \(g\in k\mathcal{-ST} [ C,D ] \) with \(k\geq0 \) and be given by

$$ g ( z ) =z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}b_{n}z^{n}. $$

Then

$$ \vert b_{n}\vert \leq\prod_{j=0}^{n-2} \frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2jD\vert }{2 ( j+1 ) }, $$

where \(\delta_{k}\) is defined by (2.2).

The main results and their consequences

This section is about the main results of our defined families \(k\mathcal{-UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) and \(k-\mathcal{UQ} [ A,B,C,D ] \). These families will be thoroughly investigated by studying their important properties including coefficient inequalities, sufficient condition, necessary condition, arc length problem, the growth rate of coefficients, convolution preserving properties and the radius of convexity problem. We will also discuss some special cases of our main results.

1. Coefficient inequalities

Theorem 3.1

Let \(f\in k\mathcal{-UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \), and let it be of the form given by (1.1). Then, for \(n\geq2\), we have

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq\frac{1}{n}\prod _{i=0}^{n-2}\frac{ \vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }+ \frac{ ( A-B ) \vert \delta_{k}\vert }{2n} \sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\prod _{i=0}^{j-2}\frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }, $$

where \(\delta_{k}\) is defined by (2.2). This result is not sharp.

Proof

Let us take

$$ zf^{\prime} ( z ) =g ( z ) p ( z ) , $$
(3.1)

where \(p\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \) and \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \). Let \(zf^{\prime} ( z ) =z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}na_{n}z^{n}\), \(g ( z ) =z+\sum_{n=2} ^{\infty}b_{n}z^{n}\) and \(p ( z ) =1+\sum_{n=1}^{ \infty}c_{n}z^{n}\). Then (3.1) becomes

$$ z+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}na_{n}z^{n}= \Biggl( z+\sum_{n=2} ^{\infty}b_{n}z^{n} \Biggr) \Biggl( 1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}c_{n}z ^{n} \Biggr) . $$

Equating the coefficients of \(z^{n}\) on both sides, we have

$$ na_{n}=b_{n}+\sum_{j=1}^{n-1}b_{j}c_{n-j}. $$

This implies that

$$ n\vert a_{n}\vert \leq \vert b_{n}\vert + \sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\vert b_{j}\vert \vert c_{n-j}\vert . $$
(3.2)

Since \(p\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \) and \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \), therefore by Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.4 we have

$$ \vert b_{n}\vert \leq\prod_{i=0}^{n-2} \frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) } $$

and

$$ \vert c_{n}\vert \leq\frac{1}{2} ( A-B ) \vert \delta _{k}\vert . $$

Hence (3.2) becomes

$$ n\vert a_{n}\vert \leq\prod_{i=0}^{n-2} \frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }+\sum_{j=1}^{n-1} \frac{ ( A-B ) \vert \delta_{k}\vert }{2} \prod_{i=0}^{j-2} \frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }, $$

which implies that

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq\frac{1}{n}\prod _{i=0}^{n-2}\frac{ \vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }+ \frac{ ( A-B ) \vert \delta_{k}\vert }{2n} \sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\prod _{i=0}^{j-2}\frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }. $$

This completes the proof. □

Corollary 3.2

([9])

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] \) which has the form (1.1). Then, for \(n\geq2\),

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq\frac{ ( \vert \delta_{k}\vert ) _{n-1}}{n!}+\frac{\vert \delta _{k}\vert }{n}\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{ ( \vert \delta _{k}\vert ) _{j-1}}{ ( j-1 ) !}. $$

Corollary 3.3

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ 1-2\beta,-1,1-2\gamma,-1 ] =f \in k-\mathcal{UK} [ \beta,\gamma ] \) which has the form (1.1). Then, for \(n\geq2\),

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq\frac{ ( \vert \delta_{k}\vert ) _{n-1}}{n!}+\frac{\vert \delta _{k}\vert }{n}\sum _{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{ ( \vert \delta _{k}\vert ) _{j-1}}{ ( j-1 ) !}. $$

Corollary 3.4

([21])

Let \(f\in0-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] = \mathcal{K}\) which has the form (1.1). Then, for \(n\geq2\),

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq n. $$

Using relation (1.5) and Theorem 3.1, we obtain immediately the following result.

Theorem 3.5

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UQ} [ A,B,C,D ] \) which has the form (1.1). Then, for \(n\geq2\),

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq\frac{1}{n^{2}}\prod _{i=0} ^{n-2}\frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }+\frac{ ( A-B ) \vert \delta_{k}\vert }{2n ^{2}}\sum _{j=1}^{n-1}\prod _{i=0}^{j-2}\frac{\vert ( C-D ) \delta_{k}-2iD\vert }{2 ( i+1 ) }. $$

By assigning different permissible values to the parameters, we obtain several known results, see [17, 21, 22].

2. Sufficient conditions

Theorem 3.6

Let \(f\in\mathcal{A}\) and be given by (1.1). Then \(f\in k\mathcal{-UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) if

$$ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \bigl[ 2 ( k+1 ) \vert b_{n}-na _{n}\vert +\bigl\vert ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\bigr\vert \bigr] < \vert B-A\vert . $$
(3.3)

Proof

Let us assume that equation (3.3) holds true. It is sufficient to show that

$$ k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf ^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1\biggr\vert - \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf^{ \prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1 \biggr) < 1. $$

Now consider

$$\begin{aligned} \biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf^{ \prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1\biggr\vert =& \biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) zf^{\prime} ( z ) - ( A-1 ) g ( z ) }{ ( B+1 ) zf^{\prime} ( z ) - ( A+1 ) g ( z ) }-1\biggr\vert \\ =&2\biggl\vert \frac{g ( z ) -zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{ ( B+1 ) zf^{\prime} ( z ) - ( A+1 ) g ( z ) }\biggr\vert \\ =&2\biggl\vert \frac{\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} ( b_{n}-na_{n} ) z^{n}}{ ( B-A ) z+\sum_{n=2}^{ \infty} [ ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n} ] z^{n}}\biggr\vert \\ \leq&\frac{2\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \vert b_{n}-na_{n}\vert }{ ( B-A ) -\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \vert ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\vert }. \end{aligned}$$

Since

$$\begin{aligned}& k\biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf ^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1\biggr\vert - \operatorname{Re} \biggl( \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf^{ \prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1 \biggr) \\& \quad \leq ( k+1 ) \biggl\vert \frac{ ( B-1 ) \frac{zf ^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A-1 ) }{ ( B+1 ) \frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }- ( A+1 ) }-1\biggr\vert \leq \frac{2 ( k+1 ) \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \vert b_{n}-na_{n}\vert }{ ( B-A ) -\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \vert ( B+1 ) na _{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\vert }. \end{aligned}$$

The last inequality is bounded by 1 if

$$ 2 ( k+1 ) \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \vert b_{n}-na_{n}\vert \leq \vert B-A\vert -\sum _{n=2}^{\infty}\bigl\vert ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\bigr\vert . $$

Hence we have

$$ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} \bigl[ 2 ( k+1 ) \vert b_{n}-na _{n}\vert +\bigl\vert ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\bigr\vert \bigr] \leq \vert B-A\vert . $$

This completes the proof. □

Theorem 3.7

Let \(f\in\mathcal{A}\) which has the form (1.1). Then \(f\in k-\mathcal{UQ} [ A,B,C,D ] \) if

$$ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n \bigl[ 2 ( k+1 ) \vert b _{n}-na_{n}\vert +\bigl\vert ( B+1 ) na_{n}- ( A+1 ) b_{n}\bigr\vert \bigr] < \vert B-A\vert . $$

The proof follows immediately by using Theorem 3.6 and relation (1.5).

Corollary 3.8

([24])

A function is said to be in the class \(1- \mathcal{UQ} [ 1-2\beta,-1,1,-1 ] =\mathcal{UQ} ( \beta ) \) for \(g ( z ) =z\) if

$$ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n^{2}\vert a_{n}\vert < \frac{1- \beta}{2}. $$

3. Necessary condition

Theorem 3.9

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \). Then, for \(\theta_{1}< \theta_{2}\), \(z\in E\),

$$ \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zf^{ \prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta>- \biggl[ \frac{C-D}{2k+1-D}+\lambda \biggr] \pi, $$

where λ is defined by (1.4).

Proof

Since \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \), there exists \(g\in k-\mathcal{CV} [ C,D ] \subset\mathcal{C} ( \beta _{1} ) \),

$$ \beta_{1}=\frac{2k+1-C}{2k+1-D} $$
(3.4)

such that

$$ f^{\prime} ( z ) =g^{\prime} ( z ) p ( z ) , $$

where \(p\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \). We can write

$$ f^{\prime} ( z ) = \bigl( g_{1}^{\prime} ( z ) \bigr) ^{1-\beta_{1}}h^{\lambda} ( z ) , \quad h\in \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \subset \mathcal{P}, g_{1}\in \mathcal{C}. $$

For \(z=re^{i\theta}\), \(0\leq r<1\), \(0\leq\theta_{1}\leq\theta_{2} \leq2\pi\), we have

$$ \begin{aligned}[b] \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zf^{ \prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta&= ( 1-\beta_{1} ) \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zg_{1}^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g_{1}^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta +\beta_{1} ( \theta_{2}- \theta_{1} ) \\ &\quad{} +\lambda \int _{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{zh^{\prime} ( z ) }{h ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta. \end{aligned} $$
(3.5)

Also, we observe that, for \(h\in\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \),

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\arg h \bigl( re^{i\theta} \bigr) =& \frac{ \partial}{\partial\theta}\operatorname{Re} \bigl\{ -i\ln h \bigl( re^{i\theta} \bigr) \bigr\} \\ =&\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{re^{i\theta}h^{\prime} ( re^{i\theta} ) }{h ( re^{i\theta} ) } \biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$

Therefore

$$ \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{re^{i\theta}h ^{\prime} ( re^{i\theta} ) }{h ( re^{i\theta} ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta=\arg h \bigl( re^{i\theta_{2}} \bigr) -\arg h \bigl( re^{i\theta_{1}} \bigr) , $$

this implies that

$$ \max_{h\in P [ A,B ] }\biggl\vert \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{re^{i\theta}h^{\prime} ( re^{i \theta} ) }{h ( re^{i\theta} ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta \biggr\vert = \max_{h\in P [ A,B ] }\bigl\vert \arg h \bigl( re^{i\theta_{2}} \bigr) -\arg h \bigl( re^{i\theta_{1}} \bigr) \bigr\vert . $$
(3.6)

Since \(h\in\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \), so

$$ \biggl\vert h ( z ) -\frac{1-ABr^{2}}{1-B^{2}r^{2}}\biggr\vert \leq\frac{ ( A-B ) r}{1-B^{2}r^{2}}. $$

From (3.6), we observe that

$$\begin{aligned} \max_{h\in P [ A,B ] }\biggl\vert \int_{\theta_{1}} ^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{re^{i\theta}h^{\prime} ( re^{i \theta} ) }{h ( re^{i\theta} ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta \biggr\vert \leq&2\sin^{-1} \biggl( \frac{ ( A-B ) r}{1-ABr^{2}} \biggr) \\ \leq&\pi-2\cos^{-1} \biggl( \frac{ ( A-B ) r}{1-ABr^{2}} \biggr) . \end{aligned}$$
(3.7)

Also, for \(g_{1}\in\mathcal{C}\), we have

$$ \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zg_{1} ^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{g_{1}^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta>-\pi. $$

Using (3.6) and (3.7) in (3.5), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zf^{ \prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta >&- ( 1-\beta_{1} ) \pi+\beta_{1} ( \theta_{2}-\theta_{1} ) -\lambda\pi+2\lambda \cos^{-1} \biggl( \frac{ ( A-B ) r}{1-ABr^{2}} \biggr) \\ >&- \biggl[ \frac{ ( C-D ) }{2k+1-D}+\lambda \biggr] \pi ( r\rightarrow1 ) . \end{aligned}$$

This completes the required result. □

Remark 3.10

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \). Then, for \(\frac{C-D}{2k+1-D}<1-\lambda\),

$$ \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zf^{ \prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta>-\pi, $$

and hence f is univalent in E, see [21].

Corollary 3.11

([21])

Let \(f\in0-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] \). Then, for \(\theta_{1}<\theta_{2}\), \(z\in E\),

$$ \int_{\theta_{1}}^{\theta_{2}}\operatorname{Re} \biggl\{ \frac{ ( zf^{ \prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{\prime} ( z ) } \biggr\} \,d\theta>-\pi. $$

4. Arc length problem

Theorem 3.12

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) which has the form (1.1). Then

$$ \mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) \leq C ( \lambda,C,D ) \biggl( \frac{1}{1-r} \biggr) ^{2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) -1}\quad ( r\rightarrow1 ) , $$

where \(\beta_{1}\) is defined by (3.4) and \(C ( \lambda,A,B ) \) is a constant depending upon λ, A and B.

Proof

Let

$$ zf^{\prime} ( z ) =g ( z ) h^{\lambda} ( z ) , $$
(3.8)

where \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \) and \(h\in\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \subset\mathcal{P}\). Since \(k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \subseteq\mathcal{S}^{\ast} ( \beta_{1} ) \), see [1]. We can write

$$ g ( z ) =z \biggl( \frac{g_{1} ( z ) }{z} \biggr) ^{1- \beta_{1}},\quad g_{1} \in\mathcal{S}^{\ast}. $$

Equation (3.8) gives

$$ zf^{\prime} ( z ) =z^{\beta_{1}} \bigl( g_{1} ( z ) \bigr) ^{1-\beta_{1}}h^{\lambda} ( z ) . $$

Now, for \(z=re^{i\theta}\),

$$ \mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) = \int_{0}^{2\pi}\bigl\vert zf ^{\prime} ( z ) \bigr\vert \,d\theta= \int_{0}^{2 \pi}\bigl\vert z^{\beta_{1}} \bigl( g_{1} ( z ) \bigr) ^{1- \beta_{1}}h^{\lambda} ( z ) \bigr\vert \,d\theta. $$

Using Holder’s inequality, we have

$$ \mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) \leq2\pi \biggl( \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi}\bigl\vert \bigl( g_{1} ( z ) \bigr) ^{ ( 1-\beta_{1} ) ( \frac{2}{2-\lambda} ) }\bigr\vert \,d\theta \biggr) ^{\frac{2-\lambda}{2}} \biggl( \frac{1}{2\pi} \int _{0}^{2\pi}\bigl\vert h ( z ) \bigr\vert ^{2}\,d\theta \biggr) ^{\frac{\lambda}{2}}. $$
(3.9)

Since \(h\in\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \subset\mathcal{P}\), so

$$ \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi}\bigl\vert h ( z ) \bigr\vert ^{2}\,d\theta\leq\frac{1+ \{ ( A-B ) ^{2}-1 \} r ^{2}}{1-r^{2}}. $$
(3.10)

Using (3.10) and the distortion result for a starlike function in (3.9), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) \leq&2\pi \biggl( \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{r^{ ( 1-\beta_{1} ) ( \frac{2}{2- \lambda} ) }}{\vert 1-re^{i\theta} \vert ^{\frac{4 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) }{2-\lambda}}}\,d\theta \biggr) ^{\frac{2- \lambda}{2}} \biggl( \frac{1+ \{ ( A-B ) ^{2}-1 \} r ^{2}}{1-r^{2}} \biggr) ^{\frac{\lambda}{2}} \\ \leq&C ( \lambda,A,B ) \biggl( \frac{1}{1-r} \biggr) ^{2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda-1} \quad ( r \rightarrow1 ) , \end{aligned}$$

where \(C ( \lambda,A,B ) =\pi^{\frac{\lambda}{2}} ( A-B ) ^{\lambda}\) and \(2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda>1\). This completes the proof. □

Corollary 3.13

([25])

Let \(f\in0-\mathcal{UK} [ 1,-1,1,-1 ] \). Then, for \(0< r<1\),

$$ \mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) \leq\mathcal{O} \biggl( \mathcal{M} ( r ) \log \frac{1}{1-r} \biggr) \quad \textit{as }r\rightarrow1, $$

where \(\mathcal{O}\)-notation denotes that the constant is absolute and \(\mathcal{M} ( r ) =\max_{\vert z\vert =r}\vert f ( z ) \vert \).

5. Growth rate of coefficients

Theorem 3.14

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) which has the form (1.1). Then, for \(k\geq0\), we have

$$ \vert a_{n}\vert \leq C ( \lambda,A,B ) n^{2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda-2}, $$

where \(\beta_{1}\) is defined by (3.4).

Proof

From Cauchy’s theorem with \(z=re^{i\theta}\), one can easily have

$$ na_{n}=\frac{1}{2\pi r^{n}} \int_{0}^{2\pi}zf^{\prime} ( z ) e^{-in\theta} \,d\theta. $$

This implies that

$$\begin{aligned} \vert na_{n}\vert \leq&\frac{1}{2\pi r^{n}} \int _{0}^{2\pi}\bigl\vert zf^{\prime} ( z ) \bigr\vert \, d\theta \\ =&\frac{1}{2\pi r^{n}}\mathcal{L}_{r} ( f ) . \end{aligned}$$

Using Theorem 3.12 and putting \(r=1-\frac{1}{n}\), we obtain the required result. □

6. Convolution properties

Theorem 3.15

If \(f\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \) and \(\varphi\in \mathcal{C}\), then \(\varphi\ast f\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \).

Proof

To prove the result, we need to prove

$$ \frac{z ( \varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{\varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) }\in k- \mathcal{P} [ A,B ] . $$

Consider

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z ( \varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{\varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) } =&\frac{ \varphi ( z ) \ast\frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }f ( z ) }{\varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) } \\ =&\frac{\varphi ( z ) \ast\Psi ( z ) f ( z ) }{\varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) }, \end{aligned}$$

where \(\frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{f ( z ) }=\Psi ( z ) \in k-\mathcal{P} [ C,D ] \). Applying Lemma 2.3, we obtain the required result. □

Theorem 3.16

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) and \(\varphi\in \mathcal{C}\). Then \(\varphi\ast f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \).

Proof

Since \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \), there exists \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \) such that \(\frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \). It follows from Lemma 2.3 that \(\varphi\ast g\in k- \mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \). Now

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z ( \varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{\varphi ( z ) \ast g ( z ) } =&\frac{ \varphi ( z ) \ast zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{\varphi ( z ) \ast g ( z ) }=\frac{\varphi ( z ) \ast\frac{zf^{\prime} ( z ) }{g ( z ) }g ( z ) }{\varphi ( z ) \ast g ( z ) } \\ =&\frac{\varphi ( z ) \ast F ( z ) g ( z ) }{\varphi ( z ) \ast g ( z ) }, \end{aligned}$$

where \(F ( z ) \in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \). Applying Lemma 2.3, we have \(\frac{z ( \varphi ( z ) \ast f ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{\varphi ( z ) \ast g ( z ) }\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) for \(z\in E\). □

7. Radius of convexity problem

Theorem 3.17

Let \(f\in k-\mathcal{UK} [ A,B,C,D ] \) in E. Then \(f\in \mathcal{C}\) for \(\vert z\vert < r_{1}\), where

$$ r_{1}=\frac{2}{2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda ( A-B ) +\sqrt{ ( [ 2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda ( A-B ) ] ^{2}+4 [ 2\beta_{1}-1 ] ) }}, $$
(3.11)

where λ and \(\beta_{1}\) are defined by (1.4) and (3.4), respectively.

Proof

Let

$$ zf^{\prime} ( z ) =g ( z ) p ( z ) , $$

where \(g\in k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \) and \(p\in k-\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \). Since \(k-\mathcal{ST} [ C,D ] \subset \mathcal{S}^{\ast} ( \beta_{1} ) \), it is known [26] that there exists \(g_{1}\in\mathcal{S}^{\ast}\) such that

$$ g ( z ) =z \biggl( \frac{g_{1} ( z ) }{z} \biggr) ^{1- \beta_{1}}. $$

We can write

$$ zf^{\prime} ( z ) =z^{\beta_{1}} \bigl( g_{1} ( z ) \bigr) ^{1-\beta_{1}}h^{\lambda} ( z ) , \quad h \in\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \subset \mathcal{P}. $$
(3.12)

The logarithmic differentiation of (3.12) yields

$$ \frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f^{ \prime} ( z ) }=\beta_{1}+ ( 1-\beta_{1} ) \frac{zg _{1}^{\prime} ( z ) }{g_{1} ( z ) }+\lambda\frac{zh ^{\prime} ( z ) }{h ( z ) }. $$

Using the distortion result for the classes \(\mathcal{S}^{\ast}\) and \(\mathcal{P} [ A,B ] \), we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Re}\frac{ ( zf^{\prime} ( z ) ) ^{\prime}}{f ^{\prime} ( z ) } \geq&\beta_{1}+ ( 1-\beta_{1} ) \frac{1-r}{1+r}-\frac{\lambda ( A-B ) r}{1-r^{2}} \\ \geq&\frac{1+ ( 1-2\beta_{1} ) r^{2}- [ 2 ( 1-\beta_{1} ) +\lambda ( A-B ) ] r}{1-r^{2}}. \end{aligned}$$
(3.13)

The right-hand side of (3.13) is positive for \(\vert z\vert < r _{1}\), where \(r_{1}\) is given by (3.11). □

We note the following cases:

  1. (i).

    For \(A=1\), \(B=-1\), \(C=1\) and \(D=-1\), we obtain the radius of convexity problem for the class \(k-\mathcal{UK}\).

  2. (ii).

    For \(k=0\), we have the radius of convexity for the class \(\mathcal{K} [ A,B,C,D ] \).

  3. (iii).

    For \(A=1\), \(B=-1\), \(C=1\), \(D=-1\) and \(k=0\), we have the radius of convexity problem for the well-known class of close-to-convex functions studied by Kaplan [21].

References

  1. Noor, KI, Malik, SN: On coefficient inequalities of functions associated with conic domains. Comput. Math. Appl. 62, 2209-2217 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, SS, Mocanu, PT: Differential Subordinations: Theory and Applications. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 225. Dekker, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Janowski, W: Some extremal problems for certain families of analytic functions. Ann. Pol. Math. 28, 297-326 (1973)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman, AW: Univalent Functions, Vol. I. Polygonal Publishing House, Washington (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Goodman, AW: Univalent Functions, Vol. II. Polygonal Publishing House, Washington (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanas, S: Techniques of the differential subordination for domains bounded by conic sections. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 38, 2389-2400 (2003)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanas, S, Wisniowska, A: Conic regions and k-uniform convexity. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 105, 327-336 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanas, S, Wisniowska, A: Conic domains and starlike functions. Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl. 45, 647-657 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Noor, KI, Arif, M, Ul-Haq, W: On k-uniformly close-to-convex functions of complex order. Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 629-635 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Noor, KI, Ul-Haq, W, Arif, M, Mustafa, S: On bounded boundary and bounded radius rotations. J. Inequal. Appl. 2009, Article ID 813687 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Noor, KI: On uniformly univalent functions with respect to symmetrical points. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 254 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Raza, M, Malik, SN, Noor, KI: On some inequalities of a certain class of analytic functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012, 250 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Haq, W, Mahmood, S: Certain properties of a class of close-to-convex functions related to conic domains. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 847287 (2013)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ul-Haq, W, Noor, KI: A certain class of analytic functions and the growth rate of Hankel determinant. J. Inequal. Appl. 2012, 309 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Silvia, EM: Subclasses of close-to-convex functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 3, 449-458 (1983)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Noor, KI: On some subclasses of close-to-convex functions in univalent functions. In: Srivistava, H, Owa, S (eds.) Fractional Calculus and Their Applications. Wiley, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Acu, M: On a subclass of n-uniformly close-to-convex functions. Gen. Math. 14, 55-64 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Aghalary, R, Azadi, G: The Dziok-Srivastava operator and k-uniformly starlike functions. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 6(2), Article ID 52 (2005) (electronic)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Libera, RJ: Some radius of convexity problems. Duke Math. J. 31, 143-158 (1964)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Noor, KI: On quasi-convex functions and related topics. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2, 241-258 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan, W: Close-to-convex Schlicht functions. Mich. Math. J. 1, 169-185 (1952)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Noor, KI, Thomas, DK: Quasi convex univalent functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 3, 255-266 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Rogosinski, W: On the coefficients of subordinate functions. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 48, 48-82 (1943)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Subramanian, KG, Sudharasan, TV, Silverman, H: On uniformly close-to-convex function and uniformly quasi-convex function. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 48, 5053-5058 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas, DK: On starlike and close-to-convex univalent functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 42, 427-435 (1967)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Noor, KI: On a generalization of uniformly convex and related functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 61(1), 117-125 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers of this paper for their valuable comments on the earlier version of the paper. They would also like to acknowledge Prof. Dr. Salim ur Rehman, V.C. Sarhad University of Science & I. T, for providing excellent research and academic environment.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors jointly worked on the results and they read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahid Mahmood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmood, S., Arif, M. & Malik, S.N. Janowski type close-to-convex functions associated with conic regions. J Inequal Appl 2017, 259 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1535-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1535-4

MSC

  • 30C45
  • 30C50

Keywords

  • close-to-convex functions
  • Janowski functions
  • conic domain