Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Journal of Inequalities and Applications Cover Image
Research
Open Access

Absolute \(\varphi- \vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta\vert _{k}\) summability of infinite series

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20172017:168

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-017-1445-5

©  The Author(s) 2017

Received: 8 March 2017

Accepted: 30 June 2017

Published: 17 July 2017

Abstract

In this paper, we established a generalized theorem on a minimal set of sufficient conditions for absolute summability factors by applying a sequence of a wider class (quasi-power increasing sequence) and the absolute Cesàro \(\varphi-\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summability for an infinite series. We further obtained well-known applications of the above theorem as corollaries, under suitable conditions.

Keywords

absolute summabilityinfinite series \(\varphi- \vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summabilityquasi-f-power increasing sequence

MSC

40F0540D1540G05

1 Introduction

Let \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}\) be an infinite series with sequence of partial sums \(\lbrace {s_{n}}\rbrace \) and the nth sequence to sequence transformation (mean) of \(\lbrace {s_{n}}\rbrace \) be given by \(u_{n}\) s.t.
$$ u_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty }u_{nk}s_{k}. $$
(1)
Before discussing \(\varphi - \vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summability, let us introduce some well-known basic summabilities which are helpful in understanding the \(\varphi - \vert C, \alpha, \beta;\delta \vert _{k}\) summability.

Definition 1

The series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a _{n}\) is said to be absolute summable, if
$$ \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty }u_{n}=s $$
(2)
and \(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\vert u_{n}-u_{n-1}\vert <\infty\).

Definition 2

[1]

Let \(t_{n}\) represent the nth \((C, 1)\) means of the sequence \((na_{n})\), then the series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}\) is said to be \(\vert C, 1\vert _{k}\) summable for \(k\geq 1\), if
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{n}\vert t_{n}\vert ^{k}< \infty. $$
(3)

Definition 3

[2]

The nth Cesáro means of order \((\alpha, \beta)\), with \(\alpha +\beta >-1\), of the sequence \((n a_{n}) \) is denoted by \(t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\), i.e.
$$ t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }=\frac{1}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }}\sum _{v=1}^{n} A_{n-v}^{\alpha -1}A_{v}^{\beta }va_{v}, $$
(4)
where
$$A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }= \textstyle\begin{cases} 0,&n< 0, \\ 1,&n=0, \\ O(n^{\alpha +\beta }),&n>0. \end{cases} $$
If the sequence \(\lbrace t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \rbrace \) satisfies
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k}}\bigl\vert t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}< \infty, $$
(5)
then the series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}\) is said to be \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha, \beta \vert _{k}\) summable.

Definition 4

For the following condition:
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}< \infty, $$
(6)
the series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}\) is said to be \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summable, where \(k\geq 1\), \(\delta \geq 0\) and \((\varphi_{n})\) is a sequence of positive real numbers.

Bor gave a number of theorems on absolute summability. In 2002, Bor found the sufficient conditions for an infinite series to be \(\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summable [3] and \(\vert C, \alpha;\delta \vert _{k}\) summable [4]. In 2011, he generalized his previous results for \(\vert C, \alpha, \beta \vert _{k}\) summability [5] and \(\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summability [6], respectively. In 2014, Bor [7] generalized the \(\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summability factor to the \(\vert C, \alpha, \beta;\delta \vert _{k}\) summability of an infinite series and in [8], he discussed a general class of power increasing sequences and absolute Riesz summability factors of an infinite series. In [9], Bor applied \(\vert C, \alpha, \gamma; \beta \vert _{k} \) summability to obtain the sufficient conditions for an infinite series to be absolute summable.

Bor [10] gave a new application of quasi-power increasing sequence by applying absolute Cesáro \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summability for an infinity series. Özarslan [11] generalized the result on \(\varphi -\vert C, 1\vert _{k} \) by a more general absolute \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summability. In 2016, Sonker and Munjal [12] determined a theorem on generalized absolute Cesáro summability with the sufficient conditions for an infinite series and in [13], they used the concept of triangle matrices for obtaining the minimal set of sufficient conditions of an infinite series to be bounded.

2 Known results

By using \(\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summability, Bor [14] gave a minimal set of sufficient conditions for an infinite series to be absolute summable.

Theorem 2.1

Let \(X_{n}\) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1 \)). Suppose also that there exists a sequence of numbers \((A_{n}) \) such that it is ξ-quasi-monotone satisfying the following:
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum n \xi_{n} X_{n}=O(1), \end{aligned}$$
(7)
$$\begin{aligned}& \Delta A_{n} \leq \xi_{n}, \end{aligned}$$
(8)
$$\begin{aligned}& \vert \Delta \lambda_{n}\vert \leq \vert A_{n}\vert , \end{aligned}$$
(9)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum A_{n} X_{n}\quad \textit{is convergent for all }n. \end{aligned}$$
(10)
If the conditions
$$\begin{aligned}& \vert \lambda_{n}\vert X_{n}=O(1)\quad \textit{as }n \rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(11)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac{(w_{n}^{\alpha })^{k}}{n}=O(X_{m})\quad \textit{as }m\rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(12)
are satisfied, then the series \({\sum a_{n}\lambda_{n}} \) is \(\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summable, \(0<\alpha \leq 1\) and \(k \geq 1\).

3 Main results

A positive sequence \(X = (X_{n})\) is said to be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence if there exists a constant \(K = K(X, f) \geq 1\) such that \(K f_{n} X_{n} \geq f_{m} X_{m}\) for all \(n \geq m \geq 1\), where \(f = [f_{n}(\eta, \zeta)] = \lbrace n^{\eta }(\log n)^{\zeta },\zeta \geq 0,0 < \eta < 1\rbrace \) [15]. If we set \(\zeta =0\), then we get a quasi-η-power increasing sequence [16].

With the help of generalized Cesáro \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summability, we modernized the results of Bor [14] and established the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1

Let \(X_{n}\) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1\)). Suppose also that there exists a ξ-quasi-monotone sequence of numbers \((A_{n}) \) such that
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum n \xi_{n} X_{n}=O(1), \end{aligned}$$
(13)
$$\begin{aligned}& \Delta A_{n} \leq \xi_{n}, \end{aligned}$$
(14)
$$\begin{aligned}& \vert \Delta \lambda_{n}\vert \leq \vert A_{n}\vert ,\quad \textit{and} \end{aligned}$$
(15)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum A_{n} X_{n}\quad \textit{is convergent for all }n. \end{aligned}$$
(16)
Then the series \({\sum a_{n}\lambda_{n}} \) is \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha,\beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summable for \(k\geq 1\), \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\beta > -1\), \(\alpha +\beta >0 \) and \(\delta \geq 0\), if the following conditions are satisfied:
$$\begin{aligned}& \vert \lambda_{n}\vert X_{n}=O(1)\quad \textit{as }n \rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(17)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=v}^{m} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{(\alpha +\beta -\delta +1)k}}=O \biggl(\frac{ \varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{(\alpha +\beta -\delta +1)k-1}} \biggr), \end{aligned}$$
(18)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta })^{k}}{n ^{k-\delta k}}=O(X_{m})\quad \textit{as }m\rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(19)
where \(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \) is given by [17]
$$ w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }= \textstyle\begin{cases} \max_{1\leq v\leq n}\vert t_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\vert , & \beta > -1, 0< \alpha < 1, \\ \vert t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\vert , & \beta > -1, \alpha =1. \end{cases} $$
(20)

4 Lemmas

We need the following lemmas for the proof of our theorem.

Lemma 4.1

[18]

If \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\beta > -1 \) and \(1\leq v\leq n\), then
$$ \Biggl\vert \sum_{p=0}^{v} A_{n-p}^{\alpha -1}A_{p}^{\beta }a_{p} \Biggr\vert \leq \max_{1\leq m\leq v} \Biggl\vert \sum _{p=0}^{m} A_{m-p}^{\alpha -1}A_{p}^{\beta }a_{p} \Biggr\vert . $$
(21)

Lemma 4.2

[19]

Let \((X_{n}) \) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1\)). If \((A_{n}) \) is a ξ-quasi-monotone sequence with \(\Delta A_{n} \leq \xi_{n} \) and \(\sum n \xi_{n} X_{n} <\infty\), then
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }n X_{n}\vert A_{n}\vert < \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(22)
$$\begin{aligned}& nA_{n}X_{n}=O(1)\quad \textit{as }n\rightarrow \infty. \end{aligned}$$
(23)

5 Proof of the theorem

Let \(t_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\) be the nth \((C, \alpha, \beta)\) mean of the sequence \((n a_{n} \lambda_{n} )\). Then the series will be \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summable (by Definition 4), if
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert T_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}< \infty. $$
(24)
Applying Abel’s transformation and Lemma 4.1, we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned}[b] T_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } &=\frac{1}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }}\sum _{v=1}^{n} {A_{n-v}^{\alpha -1}A_{v}^{\beta }va_{v} \lambda _{v}} \\ &=\frac{1}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }}\sum_{v=1}^{n-1} \Delta \lambda_{v} \sum_{p=1}^{v}{A_{n-p}^{\alpha -1}A_{p}^{\beta }pa _{p} }+\frac{\lambda_{n}}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }}\sum_{v=1} ^{n}{A_{n-v}^{\alpha -1}A_{v}^{\beta }va_{v}} , \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(25)
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned}[b] \bigl\vert T_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert &\leq \frac{1}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }} \sum_{v=1}^{n-1} \vert \Delta \lambda_{v}\vert \Biggl\vert \sum _{p=1}^{v}{A_{n-p}^{\alpha -1}A_{p}^{\beta }pa_{p} \Biggr\vert }+ \frac{\vert \lambda_{n}\vert }{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }} \Biggl\vert \sum _{v=1}^{n}{A_{n-v}^{\alpha -1}A_{v}^{\beta }va_{v}} \Biggr\vert \\ &\leq \frac{1}{A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta }}\sum_{v=1}^{n-1} {A_{v} ^{\alpha +\beta } w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta } \vert \Delta \lambda_{v}\vert }+ \vert \lambda_{n}\vert w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \\ &=T_{n,1}^{\alpha, \beta }+T_{n,2}^{\alpha, \beta }. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(26)
We use Minkowski’s inequality,
$$ \bigl\vert T_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k} =\bigl\vert T_{n,1}^{\alpha, \beta }+T_{n,2}^{\alpha, \beta } \bigr\vert ^{k}\leq 2^{k} \bigl(\bigl\vert T_{n,1}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}+\bigl\vert T_{n,2}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k} \bigr). $$
(27)
In order to complete the proof of the theorem, it is sufficient to show that
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert T_{n,r}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}< \infty,\quad \text{for } r=1,2. $$
(28)
By using Hölder’s inequality, Abel’s transformation and the conditions of Lemma 4.2 [19], we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned}[b] \sum_{n=2}^{m+1} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert T_{n,1}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k} \leq {}&\sum _{n=2}^{m+1} \frac{ \varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}} \frac{1}{(A_{n}^{\alpha +\beta })^{k}} \Biggl(\sum_{v=1}^{n-1} {A_{v}^{\alpha +\beta } w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta } \vert \Delta \lambda_{v}\vert } \Biggr)^{k} \\ \leq {}&\sum_{n=2}^{m+1} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{(1+\alpha +\beta -\delta) k}} \sum_{v=1}^{n-1} {v^{(\alpha +\beta)k} \bigl(w _{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \vert A_{v}\vert } \Biggl(\sum_{v=1}^{n-1}\vert A_{v}\vert \Biggr)^{k-1} \\ ={}&O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m} {v^{(\alpha +\beta)k} \bigl(w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \vert A_{v} \vert }\sum_{n=v+1}^{m+1}\frac{\varphi_{n} ^{k-1}}{n^{(1+\alpha +\beta -\delta) k}} \\ ={}&O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m} {v^{(\alpha +\beta)k} \bigl(w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \vert A_{v} \vert }\frac{\varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{(1+\alpha + \beta -\delta) k-1}} \\ ={}& O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m} v \vert A_{v}\vert \bigl(w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{k-\delta k}} \\ ={}& O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m-1}\Delta \bigl(v \vert A_{v}\vert \bigr) \sum_{r=1} ^{v} \bigl(w_{r}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{r}^{k-1}}{r^{k- \delta k}} \\ & {} +O(1)m\vert A_{m}\vert \sum_{v=1}^{m} \bigl(w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{k-\delta k}} \\ ={}& O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m-1} \bigl\vert (v+1) \Delta \vert A_{v}\vert -\vert A_{v}\vert \bigr\vert X_{v}+O(1) m\vert A_{m}\vert X_{m} \\ ={}& O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m-1}v \vert \Delta A_{v}\vert X_{v}+O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m-1} \vert A_{v}\vert X_{v}+O(1) m\vert A_{m} \vert X_{m} \\ ={}& O(1)\sum_{v=1}^{m-1}v \xi_{v} X_{v}+O(1)\sum_{v=1} ^{m-1}\vert A_{v}\vert X_{v}+O(1) m\vert A_{m}\vert X_{m} \\ ={}&O(1)\quad \text{as } m\rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(29)
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned}[b] \sum_{n=2}^{m} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert T_{n,2}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k} ={}&O(1)\sum_{n=1}^{m} \vert \lambda_{n}\vert \bigl(w _{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}} \\ ={}&O(1)\sum_{n=1}^{m-1}\Delta \vert \lambda_{n}\vert \sum_{v=1} ^{n} \bigl(w_{v}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{k- \delta k}} +O(1)\vert \lambda_{m}\vert \sum_{n=1}^{m} \bigl(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr)^{k} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}} \\ ={}&O(1)\sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \vert \Delta \lambda_{n}\vert X_{n}+O(1)\vert \lambda_{m} \vert X_{m} \\ ={}&O(1)\sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \vert A_{n}\vert X_{n}+O(1)\vert \lambda_{m}\vert X_{m} \\ ={}&O(1) \quad \text{as }m\rightarrow \infty. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(30)
Collecting (24)-(30), we have
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k-\delta k}}\bigl\vert T_{n}^{\alpha, \beta }\bigr\vert ^{k}< \infty. $$
(31)
Hence the proof of the theorem is completed.

6 Corollaries

Corollary 6.1

Let \(X_{n}\) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1\)) and there exists a sequence of numbers \((A_{n}) \) such that it is ξ-quasi-monotone satisfying (13)-(17) and the following condition:
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac{{(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta })^{k}}}{n^{1-\delta k}}=O(X_{m})\quad \textit{as }m\rightarrow \infty, $$
(32)
then the series \({\sum a_{n}\lambda_{n}} \) is \(\vert C, \alpha, \beta;\delta \vert _{k} \) summable, \(\alpha +\beta >\delta\), \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\beta >-1\), \(\delta \geq 0\), \(k\geq 1\), where \(w_{n}^{ \alpha, \beta } \) is given by (20).

Proof

On putting \(\varphi_{n}=n \) in Theorem 3.1, we will get (32) and the following condition:
$$ \sum_{n=v}^{m} \frac{1}{n^{1+k(\alpha +\beta -\delta)}}=O \biggl(\frac{1}{v ^{(\alpha +\beta -\delta)k}} \biggr). $$
(33)
Here, condition (33) always holds. We omit the details as the proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 using the conditions (33) and (32) instead of (18) and (19). □

Corollary 6.2

Let \(X_{n}\) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1 \)) and there exists a sequence of numbers \((A_{n}) \) such that it is ξ-quasi-monotone satisfying (13)-(17) and the following conditions:
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=v}^{m} \frac{\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n^{k(1+\alpha +\beta)}}=\frac{ \varphi_{v}^{k-1}}{v^{k(1+\alpha +\beta)-1}}, \end{aligned}$$
(34)
$$\begin{aligned}& \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac{{(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta })^{k}}\varphi_{n}^{k-1}}{n ^{k}}=O(X_{m})\quad \textit{as }m\rightarrow \infty, \end{aligned}$$
(35)
then the series \({\sum a_{n}\lambda_{n}} \) is \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha,\beta \vert _{k}\) summable, \(\alpha +\beta >0\), \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(\beta > -1\), \(k\geq 1\), where \(w_{n}^{\alpha, \beta } \) is given by (20).

Proof

On putting \(\delta =0 \) in Theorem 3.1, we will get (34) and (35). We omit the details as the proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 using the conditions (34) and (35) instead of (18) and (19). □

Corollary 6.3

[14]

Let \(X_{n}\) be a quasi-f-power increasing sequence for some η (\(0<\eta <1\)) and there exists a sequence of numbers \((A_{n}) \) such that it is ξ-quasi-monotone satisfying (13)-(17) and the following conditions:
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac{{(w_{n}^{\alpha })^{k}}}{n}=O(X_{m}) \quad \textit{as }m\rightarrow \infty, $$
(36)
then the series \({\sum a_{n}\lambda_{n}} \) is \(\vert C, \alpha \vert _{k}\) summable, \(0<\alpha \leq 1\), \(k\geq 1\), where \(w_{n}^{\alpha } \) is given by
$$ w_{n}^{\alpha }= \textstyle\begin{cases} \vert t_{n}^{\alpha }\vert ,& \alpha =1, \\ \max_{1\leq v\leq n}\vert t_{v}^{\alpha }\vert ,& 0< \alpha < 1. \end{cases} $$
(37)

Proof

On putting \(\varphi_{n}=n \), \(\delta =0 \) and \(\beta =0 \) in Theorem 3.1, we will get (36) and the following condition:
$$ \sum_{n=v}^{m} \frac{1}{n^{1+k\alpha }}=O \biggl(\frac{1}{v^{k\alpha }} \biggr). $$
(38)
Here, condition (38) always holds. We omit the details as the proof is similar to that of Theorem 3.1 using the conditions (38) and (36) instead of (18) and (19). □

7 Conclusion

The aim of our paper is to obtain the minimal set of sufficient conditions for an infinite series to be absolute Cesáro \(\varphi -\vert C, \alpha, \beta; \delta \vert _{k}\) summable. Through the investigation, we may conclude that our theorem is a generalized version which can be reduced for several well-known summabilities as shown in the corollaries. Further, our theorem has been validated through Corollary 6.3, which is a result of Bor [14].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous learned referee for his/her valuable suggestions which improved the paper considerably. The authors are also thankful to all the Editorial board members and reviewers of Journal of Inequalities and Applications.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra, Kurukshetra, India

References

  1. Flett, TM: On an extension of absolute summability and some theorems of Littlewood and Paley. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 3(1), 113-141 (1957) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Borwein, D: Theorems on some methods of summability. Q. J. Math. 9(1), 310-316 (1958) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bor, H, Srivastava, HM: Almost increasing sequences and their applications. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 3, 29-35 (2002) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Bor, H: An application of almost increasing sequences. Math. Inequal. Appl. 5(1), 79-83 (2002) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bor, H: Factors for generalized absolute Cesàro summability. Math. Comput. Model. 53(5), 1150-1153 (2011) View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Bor, H: An application of almost increasing sequences. Appl. Math. Lett. 24(3), 298-301 (2011) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bor, H: Almost increasing sequences and their new applications II. Filomat 28(3), 435-439 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Bor, H: A new theorem on the absolute Riesz summability factors. Filomat 28(8), 1537-1541 (2014) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Bor, H: Factors for generalized absolute Cesàro summability. Math. Commun. 13(1), 21-25 (2008) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Bor, H: A new application of quasi power increasing sequences II. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013, 75 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Özarslan, HS: A note on absolute summability factors. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 113(2), 165-169 (2003) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonker, S, Munjal, A: Absolute summability factor \(\varphi-\vert {C}, 1, \delta \vert _{k}\) of infinite series. Int. J. Math. Anal. 10(23), 1129-1136 (2016) View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Sonker, S, Munjal, A: Sufficient conditions for triple matrices to be bounded. Nonlinear Stud. 23(4), 533-542 (2016) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Bor, H: Some new results on infinite series and Fourier series. Positivity 19(3), 467-473 (2015) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Sulaiman, WT: Extension on absolute summability factors of infinite series. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 322(2), 1224-1230 (2006) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Leindler, L: A new application of quasi power increasing sequences. Publ. Math. (Debr.) 58(4), 791-796 (2001) MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Bor, H: On a new application of power increasing sequences. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. 57(4), 205-209 (2008) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Bosanquet, LS: A mean value theorem. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1-16(3), 146-148 (1941) MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Bor, H: On the quasi monotone and generalized power increasing sequences and their new applications. J. Class. Anal. 2(2), 139-144 (2013) MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017