 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
On the least signless Laplacian eigenvalue of a nonbipartite connected graph with fixed maximum degree
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2017, Article number: 120 (2017)
Abstract
In this paper, we determine the unique graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all nonbipartite unicyclic graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ and among all nonbipartite connected graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ, respectively.
Introduction
All graphs considered in this paper are finite, simple and undirected. Let G be a graph with vertex set \(V=V(G)= \{v_{1}, v _{2}, \ldots, v_{n}\}\) and edge set \(E=E(G)\). Write \(A(G)\) for the adjacency matrix of G and let \(D(G)\) be the diagonal matrix of the degrees of G. The matrix \(Q(G)=D(G)+ A(G)\) is called the signless Laplacian matrix of G. As usual, let \(q_{1}(G)\ge q_{2}(G) \ge \cdots\ge q_{n}(G)\ge0\) denote the eigenvalues of \(Q(G)\) and call them the signless Laplacian eigenvalues of G. Denote by \(\kappa(G)\) the least eigenvalue of G.
For a connected graph G, \(\kappa(G) = 0\) if and only if G is bipartite. Desai and Rao [1] suggest the use of \(\kappa(G)\) as a measure of nonbipartiteness of G. Fallat and Fan [2] introduce two parameters reflecting the graph bipartiteness, and establish a relationship between \(\kappa(G)\) and the two parameters. de Lima, Nikiforov and Oliveira [3] point out that \(\kappa(G)\) depends more on the distribution of the edges of a graph than on their number, so it may become a useful tool in extremal graph theory. For a connected nonbipartite graph G with given order, how small can \(\kappa(G)\) be? Cardoso et al. [4] propose this problem and show that the minimum value of \(\kappa(G)\) is attained uniquely in the unicyclic graph obtained from the cycle \(C_{3}\) by attaching a path at one of its end vertices. Motivated by this problem, a good deal of attention has been devoted to finding all graphs with the minimal least signless Laplacian eigenvalue among a given class of graphs. For related results, one may refer to [5–14].
A unicyclic graph is a connected graph with a unique cycle. Let \(\Delta=\Delta(G)\) be the maximum degree of a graph G. In this paper, we determine the unique graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all nonbipartite unicyclic graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ and among all nonbipartite connected graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ, respectively.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some notions and lemmas used further, and prove three new lemmas. In Section 3, we prove two theorems which is our main result. In Section 4, we propose two problems for further research.
Preliminaries
Denote by \(C_{n}\) the cycle on n vertices. Let \(Guv\) denote the graph which arises from G by deleting the edge \(uv\in E(G)\). Similarly, \(G+uv\) is the graph that arises from G by adding an edge \(uv\notin E(G)\), where \(u, v\in V(G)\). For \(v\in V(G)\), \(N(v)\) denotes the neighborhood of v in G and \(d(v)=\vert N(v)\vert \) denotes the degree of vertex v. A pendant vertex of G is a vertex of degree 1. \(\vert x\vert \) denotes the absolute value of a real number x. The terminology not defined here can be found in [15].
Lemma 2.1
[16]
Let G be a graph on n vertices, e be an edge of G. Then
Given \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T} \in R^{n}\), we can define a function on \(V(G)\), that is, each vertex \(v_{i}\) is mapped to \(x_{i} =x(v_{i})\). If x is an eigenvector of \(Q(G)\), then it is defined on G naturally, i.e. \(x(v)\) is the entry of x corresponding to v. Clearly, for \(x\in R^{n}\),
Let \(x\in R^{n}\) be an arbitrary unit vector. One can find in [10, 15] that
with equality if and only if x is an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\).
Let \(G_{1}\) and \(G_{2}\) be two vertexdisjoint connected graphs, and let \(v_{i}\in V(G_{i})\) for \(i=1, 2\). Identifying the \(v_{1}\) with \(v_{2}\) and forming a new vertex u (see [10] for details), the resulting graph is called coalescence of \(G_{1}\) and \(G_{2}\), and denoted by \(G_{1}(v_{1})\diamond G_{2}(v_{2})\) or \(G_{1}(u)\diamond G _{2}(u)\). If a connected graph G can be expressed in the form \(G_{1}(u)\diamond G_{2}(u)\), where \(G_{1}\) and \(G_{2}\) are both nontrivial and connected, then \(G_{1}\) is called a branch of G with root u. Clearly \(G_{2}\) is also a branch of G with root u. Let \(x\in R^{n}\) be a vector defined on \(V(G)\). A branch \(G_{i}\) of G is called a zero branch with respect to x if \(x(v) = 0\) for all \(v \in V(G_{i})\); otherwise it is called a nonzero branch with respect to x.
Lemma 2.2
[10]
Let G be a connected graph which contains a bipartite branch B with root u, and x be an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\).

(i)
If \(x(u) = 0\), then B is a zero branch of G with respect to x.

(ii)
If \(x(u)\neq0\), then \(x(v)\neq0\) for every vertex \(v\in V(B)\).
Lemma 2.3
[10]
Let G be a nonbipartite connected graph, and let x be an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\). Let T be a tree, which is a nonzero branch of G with respect to x and with root u. Then \(\vert x(q)\vert < \vert x(p)\vert \) whenever p, q are vertices of T such that q lies on the unique path from u to p.
Lemma 2.4
[12]
Let \(G = C(v_{0})\diamond B(v_{0})\) (see Figure 1), where \(C=v_{0}v _{1}v_{2}\cdots v_{k}u_{k}u_{k1} \cdots u_{1}v _{0}\) is a cycle of length \(2k+1\) and B is a nontrivial connected bipartite graph. Let \(x=( x(v_{0}),x(v_{1}),x(v_{2}),\ldots,x(v_{k}),x(u_{1}), x(u_{2}),\ldots,x(u_{k}),\ldots)^{T}\) be an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\). Then

(i)
\(\vert x(v_{0})\vert =\max\{\vert x(w)\vert \vert w\in V(C)\}>0\);

(ii)
\(x(v_{i})=x(u_{i})\) for \(i=1, 2, \ldots, k\).
Lemma 2.5
[12]
Let \(G = G_{1}(v_{2}) \diamond T(u)\) and \(G^{*} = G_{1}(v_{1})\diamond T(u)\), where \(G_{1}\) is a nonbipartite connected graph containing two distinct vertices \(v_{1}\), \(v_{2}\), and T is a nontrivial tree. If there exists an eigenvector \(x=( x(v_{1}),x(v_{2}),\ldots,x(v_{k}),\ldots)^{T}\) corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\) such that \(\vert x(v_{1})\vert > \vert x(v_{2})\vert \) or \(\vert x(v_{1})\vert = \vert x(v_{2})\vert > 0\), then \(\kappa(G^{*})<\kappa(G)\).
For \(k \ge1\), let \(G'\) denote the graph obtained from G by deleting the edge uv, inserting k new vertices \(v_{1}, v_{2}, \ldots, v _{k}\) and adding edges \(uv_{1}, v_{1}v_{2}, \ldots, v_{k1}v_{k}, v _{k}v\). Then \(G'\) is called a ksubdivision graph of G by ksubdividing the edge uv.
Lemma 2.6
[17]
Let \(G'\) be a ksubdivision graph of a graph G. If k is even, then \(\kappa(G')\le\kappa(G)\).
\(U_{n}^{k}(g)\), showed in Figure 2, denotes the unicyclic graph on n vertices with odd girth g and k pendant vertices, where \(g+l+k=n\). \(U_{n}^{*}(3, \Delta)\), showed in Figure 2, denotes the unicyclic graph on n vertices obtained from the cycle \(C_{3}=v_{1}v _{2}v_{3}v_{1}\) by attaching \(\Delta3\) pendant edges and one pendant path at the vertex \(v_{3}\).
Lemma 2.7
Among all nonbipartite connected graphs on n vertices with k pendant vertices, \(U_{n}^{k}(3)\) is the unique graph whose signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum.
Lemma 2.8
[5]
Let \(k\ge2\), and \(g\ge3\) be an odd integer. Then \(\kappa(U_{n}^{k1}(g))< \kappa(U_{n}^{k}(g))\).
Lemma 2.9
Let \(G = G_{1}(v)\diamond B(v)\) be a connected graph, where \(G_{1}\) is a graph of order n, and B is a bipartite graph of order s. Then \(\kappa(G ) \le\kappa(G_{1})\). Moreover, if \(s>1\), \(G_{1}\) is nonbipartite and there exists an eigenvector x corresponding to \(\kappa(G_{1})\) such that \(x(v)\neq0\), then \(\kappa(G )<\kappa(G_{1})\).
Proof
Let \(V(G_{1})=\{ v_{1}, v_{2}, \ldots, v_{n} \}\), and \(x=(x(v_{1}), x(v_{2}), \ldots, x(v_{n}))^{T}\) be a unit eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G_{1})\). Then
Without loss generality, we may assume \(v=v_{n}\). Let \(V(B)=\{ v_{n}, v_{n+1}, \ldots, v_{n+s1} \}\), and let \((U, W)\) be the two parts of the bipartite graph B, where \(v\in U\). Let \(y=(y(v_{1}), y(v_{2}), \ldots, y(v_{n}), y(v_{n+1}), \ldots, y(v_{n+s1}))^{T}\in R^{n+s1}\) defined on \(V(G)\) satisfy that \(y(v_{i})=x(v_{i})\) for \(i=1, 2, \ldots, n\), \(y(u)=x(v)\) if \(u\in U\), and \(y(u)=x(v)\) if \(u\in W\). Then
Clearly, if \(s>1\), \(G_{1}\) is nonbipartite and \(x(v)\neq0\), we have \(\Vert y\Vert ^{2}>\Vert x\Vert ^{2}\). This implies that \(\kappa(G) <\kappa(G_{1})\). □
Lemma 2.10
Let \(n\ge9\) and \(s\ge0\) be integer. \(G_{1}\) and \(G_{2}\), shown in Figure 3, are two unicyclic graphs of order n. Then \(\kappa(G_{2})< \kappa(G_{1})\).
Proof
Let \(\kappa=\kappa(G_{1})\), and \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) be a unit eigenvector corresponding to κ. Then \(\kappa= \sum_{v_{i}v_{j}\in E(G_{1})}(x_{i}+x_{j})^{2}\) and \(0<\kappa<1\). By Lemmas 2.2 and 2.4, we have \(x_{n}\neq0\). From the eigenvalue equation \(Q(G_{1})x =\kappa x\), we have
Let \(y=(y_{1}, y_{2}, \ldots, y_{n})^{T}\in R^{n}\) defined on \(V(G_{2})\) satisfy that
and \(y_{i}=x_{i}\) for \(i=1, 2, \ldots, n6, n4, n3, n2, n1\). Then
and
Let \(f(t)=t^{7}10t^{6}+32t^{5}18t^{4}89t^{3}+156t^{2}70t+4\). By a computation, \(f(t)=0\) has five real roots which are approximately equal to −1.7787, 0.0667, 0.6606, 2, 2.0890, respectively. By Lemma 2.9, we have
Note that \(G_{1}v_{4}\cdotsv_{s+3}\) is a 2tsubdividing graph of \(G_{3}\) or \(G_{4}\) (shown in Figure 3). By Lemma 2.6, we have
By a computation, we have \(\kappa(G_{3})\approx0.0588025\) and \(\kappa(G_{5})\approx0.0426304\). It follows that \(\kappa< 0.0667\). Noting that \(f(0)=4\), we have \(f(\kappa)>0\). It follows that \(\Vert y\Vert ^{2}>\Vert x\Vert ^{2}\).
Combining the above arguments, we have
This completes the proof. □
Lemma 2.11
Let \(n\ge9\), and \(U_{n}^{n5}(3)\), \(U_{n}^{n4}(3)\), \(U_{n}^{*}(3, n4)\), \(U_{n}^{*}(3, n3)\) be shown in Figure 2. Then
Proof
Let \(\kappa=\kappa(U_{n}^{*}(3, n4))\), and \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) be a unit eigenvector corresponding to κ. By Corollary 1.3 of [18], it is easy to see \(\kappa(G)<1/2\). From the eigenvalue equation \(Q(U_{n}^{*}(3, n4))x =\kappa x\), we have \(x_{1}=x_{2}\), \(x_{4}=\cdots=x_{n4}\),
Since \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) is an eigenvector, \(x\neq0\). It follows that
This implies that κ is the least root of the following equation:
Similarly, we can see that \(\kappa(U_{n}^{n5}(3))\) is the least root of the following equation:
Noting that \(g(0)=4<0\) and
for \(0< x<1/2\), we have \(g(\kappa)>0\), and so
By a similar reasoning to above, we can see that \(\kappa(U_{n}^{*}(3, n3))\) and \(\kappa(U_{n}^{n4}(3))\) are the least root of the following equations respectively:
Noting that \(r(0)=4>0\) and
for \(0< x<1/2\), we have \(r(\kappa(U_{n}^{*}(3, n3)))<0\), and so
This completes the proof. □
Main results
Let \(\mathcal{U}(n, \Delta)\) be the set of nonbipartite unicyclic graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ, and \(\mathcal{G}(n, \Delta)\) be the set of nonbipartite connected graphs of order n with maximum degree Δ. In this section, we firstly determine the unicyclic graph whose signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all graphs in \(\mathcal{U}(n, \Delta)\).
Theorem 3.1
Let \(4\le\Delta\le n3\). Among all graphs in \(\mathcal{U}(n, \Delta)\), \(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\) is the unique graph whose signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum.
Proof
Let \(G\in\mathcal{U}(n, \Delta)\), and \(C_{g}=v_{1}v_{2}\ldots v _{g}v_{1}\) be the unique cycle of G. Then g is odd, and G can be obtained by attaching trees \(T_{1},T_{2},\ldots,T_{g}\) to the vertices \(v_{1},v_{2},\ldots,v_{g}\) of \(C_{g}\), respectively, where \(T_{i}\) contains the root vertex \(v_{i}\) for \(i=1,2, \ldots, g\). \(\vert V(T_{i})\vert =1\) means \(V(T_{i})=\{v_{i}\}\). Suppose that G has k pendant vertices. It is easy to see \(\Delta\le k+2\). Let \(x=(x_{1}, x _{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) be a unit eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\).
Case 1. \(\Delta\le k+1\). By Lemma 2.7, we have \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ k}(3))\le\kappa(G)\) with equality if and only if \(G=U_{n}^{ k}(3)\). By Lemma 2.8, we have \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\le\kappa(U_{n}^{ k}(3))\) with equality if and only if \(\Delta=k+1\). It follows that \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\le \kappa(G)\) with equality if and only if \(G=U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\).
Case 2. \(\Delta=k+2\). Then G must be the graph obtained from the cycle \(C_{g}\) with k pendant paths \(P_{i_{1}},\ldots,P_{i_{k}}\) attached at the same vertex \(v_{1}\) of \(C_{g}\), and \(k\ge2\).
If \(g\ge5\), by Lemma 2.4, we have \(x_{(g3)/2}=x_{(g+3)/2}\) and \(\vert x_{2}\vert \le \vert x_{1}\vert \). Let
Then \(\Delta(G ')=\Delta\), \(G '\) has \(k+1\) pendant vertices, and from (1) we have
If \(\kappa(G ')=\kappa(G)\), then \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) is also an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G ')\). By Lemmas 2.4 and 2.3, we have \(\vert x_{2}\vert >\vert x_{1}\vert >0\), a contradiction. Therefore \(\kappa(G ')<\kappa(G)\). By Lemma 2.7, we have \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ k+1}(3))\le\kappa(G ')\). It follows that
Now we assume that \(g=3\). If \(G\neq U_{n}^{*}(3, \Delta)\), then there are two paths attached at the vertex \(v_{1}\) with length more than 1. Without loss of generality, we may assume that \(i_{1}\ge3\) and \(i_{2}\ge3\). Let \(P_{i_{1}}=v_{1}\ldots v_{b}v_{a}\) and \(P_{i_{2}}=v _{1}\ldots v_{d}v_{c}\). Without loss of generality, we may assume that \(\vert x_{b}\vert \ge \vert x_{d}\vert >0\). Let \(G '=Gv_{d}v_{c}+v_{b}v_{c}\). Then \(\Delta(G ')=\Delta\), \(G '\) has \(k+1\) pendant vertices. By Lemma 2.5, we have \(\kappa(G ')<\kappa(G)\). It follows from Lemma 2.7 that
If \(G=U_{n}^{*}(3, \Delta)\) and \(\Delta\le n5\), by Lemma 2.3, we have \(\vert x_{n4}\vert >\vert x_{3}\vert \). Let
Let \(s=\Delta4\). Then by Lemma 2.5, we have \(\kappa(G_{1})< \kappa(U_{n}^{*}(3, \Delta))\). Let
By Lemma 2.10, we have \(\kappa(G_{2})<\kappa(G_{1})\). Noting that \(G_{2}\) has \(\Delta1\) pendant vertices, by Lemma 2.7, we have
If \(G=U_{n}^{*}(3, n4)\) or \(U_{n}^{*}(3, n3)\), by Lemma 2.11, we have
This completes the proof. □
Secondly, we determine the graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all graphs in \(\mathcal{G}(n, \Delta)\).
Theorem 3.2
Let \(4\le\Delta\le n3\). Among all graphs in \(\mathcal{G}(n, \Delta)\), \(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\) is the unique graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum.
Proof
Let \(G\in\mathcal{G}(n, \Delta)\) such that \(\kappa(G)\) as small as possible, and let \(v\in V(G)\) such that \(d_{G}(v)=\Delta\). By deleting edges from G, we can get a nonbipartite unicyclic spanning subgraph of G, denoted by \(G'\), such that \(d_{G'}(v)=\Delta\). By Lemma 2.1, we have \(\kappa(G')\leq\kappa(G)\). By Theorem 3.1, we have \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\le\kappa(G')\) with equality if and only if \(G'=U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\). Therefore
Noting that G is the graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all graphs in \(\mathcal{G}(n, \Delta)\), we have \(\kappa(G)\le\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\). It follows that \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))=\kappa(G)\). This implies that G may be obtained from \(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\) by adding edges. Let \(x=(x_{1}, x_{2}, \ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) be a unit eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(G)\). Then
Since \(\kappa(G)=\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\), it follows that
Therefore \(x=(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots, x_{n})^{T}\) is also an eigenvector corresponding to \(\kappa(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\). By Lemmas 2.4 and 2.3, we have
From the eigenvalue equation \(Q(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))x=\kappa(U _{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))x\), we have \(x_{n\Delta+2}=\cdots=x_{n}\). If \(E(G)\setminus E(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))\neq\emptyset\), then
which yields a contradiction. So \(E(G)\setminus E(U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3))= \emptyset\). Therefore, \(G=U_{n}^{ \Delta1}(3)\). □
Remark 3.3
For \(\Delta=2\), we know that \(\mathcal{G}(n, 2)=\{C_{n}\}\) with n being odd. For \(\Delta=3\), from [4], we know that \(U_{n}^{ 1}(3)\) is the unique graph whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all graphs in \(\mathcal{G}(n, 3)\). For \(\Delta=n1\), \(\mathcal{U}(n, n1)=\{S_{n}^{*}\}\), where \(S_{n}^{*}\) is obtained by adding one edge to the star \(K_{1, n1}\). Let \(G\in\mathcal{G}(n, n1)\setminus\{S_{n}^{*}\}\), then G is obtained from \(S_{n}^{*}\) by adding at least one edge. By a similar reasoning to that of Theorem 3.2, we can show that \(\kappa(S_{n}^{*})< \kappa(G)\). For \(\Delta=n2\), \(\mathcal{U}(n, n2)=\{ S_{n1}^{*+1}, S_{n1}^{*+2} \}\), where \(S_{n1}^{*+1}\) is obtained from \(S_{n1}^{*}\) by adding one pendant edge to a vertex of degree 1, and \(S_{n1}^{*+2}\) is obtained from \(S_{n1}^{*}\) by adding one pendant edge to a vertex of degree 2. From Lemmas 2.5, 2.4 and 2.6, we may obtain \(\kappa(S_{n1}^{*+1})<\kappa(S_{n1} ^{*+2})\). Let \(G\in\mathcal{G}(n, n2)\setminus\{ S_{n1}^{*+1}, S_{n1}^{*+2} \}\), then G is obtained from \(S_{n1}^{*+1}\) or \(S_{n1}^{*+2}\) by adding at least one edge. By a similar reasoning to that of Theorem 3.2, we can show that \(\kappa(S_{n1}^{*+1})<\kappa (G)\).
Discussion
Recalling that \(\kappa(G)\) depends more on the distribution of the edges of a graph than on their number, we propose the following problems for further research.

(1)
Characterize all extremal graphs whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all nonbipartite unicyclic graphs with a given degree sequence.

(2)
Characterize all extremal graphs whose least signless Laplacian eigenvalue attains the minimum among all nonbipartite connected graphs with a given degree sequence.
References
Desai, M, Rao, V: A characterization of the smallest eigenvalue of a graph. J. Graph Theory 18, 181194 (1994)
Fallat, S, Fan, YZ: Bipartiteness and the least eigenvalue of signless Laplacian of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 436, 32543267 (2012)
de Lima, LS, Nikiforov, V, Oliveira, CS: The clique number and the smallest Qeigenvalue of graphs. Discrete Math. 339, 17441752 (2016)
Cardoso, DM, Cvetković, D, Rowlinson, P, Simić, SK: A sharp lower bound for the least eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian of a nonbipartite graph. Linear Algebra Appl. 429, 27702780 (2008)
Fan, YZ, Wang, Y, Guo, H: The least eigenvalues of signless Laplacian of nonbipartite graphs with pendant vertices. Discrete Math. 313, 903909 (2013)
Fan, YZ, Tan, YY: The least eigenvalue of signless Laplacian of nonbipartite graphs with given domination number. Discrete Math. 334, 2025 (2014)
Guo, SG, Liu, X, Zhang, R, Yu, G: Ordering nonbipartite unicyclic graphs with pendant vertices by the least Qeigenvalue. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 136 (2016)
Li, SC, Wang, SJ: The least eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian of the complements of trees. Linear Algebra Appl. 436, 23982405 (2012)
Liu, RF, Wan, HX, Yuan, JJ, Jia, HC: The least eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian of nonbipartite unicyclic graphs with k pendant vertices. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 26, 333344 (2013)
Wang, Y, Fan, YZ: The least eigenvalue of signless Laplacian of graphs under perturbation. Linear Algebra Appl. 436, 20842092 (2012)
Wen, Q, Zhao, Q, Liu, HQ: The least signless Laplacian eigenvalue of nonbipartite graphs with given stability number. Linear Algebra Appl. 476, 148158 (2015)
Yu, GL, Guo, SG, Xu, ML: On the least signless Laplacian eigenvalue of some graphs. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 26, 560573 (2013)
Yu, GL, Guo, SG, Zhang, R, Wu, YR: The domination number and the least Qeigenvalue. Appl. Math. Comput. 244, 274282 (2014)
Yu, GD, Fan, YZ, Wang, Y: Quadratic forms on graphs with application to minimizing the least eigenvalue of signless Laplacian over bicycle graphs. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 27, 213236 (2014)
Cvetković, D: Spectral theory of graphs based on the signless Laplacian. Research report. http://www.mi.sanu.ac.rs/projects/signless_L_reportApr11.pdf (2010)
Heuvel, JVD: Hamilton cycles and eigenvalues of graphs. Linear Algebra Appl. 226228, 723730 (1995)
He, CX, Pan, H: The smallest signless Laplacian eigenvalue of graphs under perturbation. Electron. J. Linear Algebra 23, 473482 (2012)
de Lima, LS, Oliveira, CS, de Abreu, NMM, Nikiforov, V: The smallest eigenvalue of the signless Laplacian. Linear Algebra Appl. 435, 25702584 (2011)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11171290, 11271315) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20151295).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors completed the paper together. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, SG., Zhang, R. On the least signless Laplacian eigenvalue of a nonbipartite connected graph with fixed maximum degree. J Inequal Appl 2017, 120 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s136600171395y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s136600171395y
MSC
 05C50
Keywords
 nonbipartite graph
 signless Laplacian
 least eigenvalue
 maximum degree