- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Non-hermitian extensions of Heisenberg type and Schrödinger type uncertainty relations
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2015, Article number: 381 (2015)
Abstract
In quantum mechanics it is well known that the Heisenberg-Schrödinger uncertainty relations hold for two non-commutative observables and density operator. Recently Dou and Du (J. Math. Phys. 54:103508, 2013; Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53:952-958, 2014) obtained several uncertainty relations for two non-commutative non-hermitian observables and density operators. In this paper, we show that their results can be given as corollaries of our non-hermitian extensions of Heisenberg type or Schrödinger type uncertainty relations for the generalized metric adjusted skew information or generalized metric adjusted correlation measures which were obtained in Furuichi and Yanagi (J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388:1147-1156, 2012).
1 Introduction
Let \(M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) (resp. \(M_{n,sa}(\mathbb{C})\)) be the set of all \(n \times n\) complex matrices (resp. all \(n \times n\) self-adjoint matrices), endowed with the Hilbert-Schmidt scalar product \(\langle A,B \rangle= \operatorname{Tr}[A^{*}B]\). Let \(M_{n,+}(\mathbb {C})\) be the set of strictly positive elements of \(M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb {C}) \subset M_{n,+}(\mathbb{C})\) be the set of strictly positive density matrices, that is, \(M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C}) = \{ \rho\in M_{n}(\mathbb{C}) | \operatorname{Tr}[\rho] = 1, \rho> 0 \}\). If it is not otherwise specified, from now on we shall treat the case of faithful states, that is, \(\rho> 0\). It is well known that the expectation of an observable \(A \in M_{n,sa}(\mathbb{C})\) in a state \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\) is defined by
and the variance of an observable \(A \in M_{n,sa}(\mathbb{C})\) in a state \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\) is defined by
In order to represent the degree of non-commutativity between \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(A \in M_{n,sa}(\mathbb{C})\), the Wigner-Yanase skew information \(I_{\rho}(A)\) is defined by
where \([X,Y] = XY-YX\). Furthermore the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information \(I_{\rho,\alpha}(A)\) is defined by
The convexity of \(I_{\rho,\alpha}(A)\) with respect to ρ was famously shown by Lieb [4]. The relationship between Wigner-Yanase skew information and the uncertainty relation was given by Luo and Zhang [5] for the first time. Afterward, the relationship between Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information and the uncertainty relation was given by Kosaki [6] and Yanagi et al. [7]. Furthermore metric adjusted skew information was defined by Hansen [8] which is an extension of Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information. The relationship between metric adjusted skew information and the uncertainty relation was given by Yanagi [9] and was generalized in Yanagi et al. [10] for generalized metric adjusted skew information and generalized metric adjusted correlation measures. In this paper we give some non-hermitian extensions of Heisenberg type and Schrödinger type uncertainty relations related to generalized quasi-metric adjusted skew information and generalized quasi-metric adjusted correlation measures. As a result we can obtain some results of non-hermitian uncertainty relations given by Dou and Du as corollaries of our results.
2 Dou-Du’s non-hermitian uncertainty relations
Definition 1
For \(A,B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\), \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\), we define the following.
-
(1)
\([A,B]^{0} = \frac{1}{2}([A,B]+[A^{*},B^{*}])\), where \([A,B] = AB-BA\).
-
(2)
\(\{A,B \}^{0} = \frac{1}{2}(\{A,B \}+\{A^{*},B^{*} \})\), where \(\{ A,B \} = AB+BA\).
-
(3)
\(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}|(A) = \operatorname{Tr}[\rho A_{0}^{*}A_{0}]\), where \(A_{0} = A-\operatorname{Tr}[\rho A]I\).
-
(4)
\(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A) = \frac{1}{2}(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}|(A)+|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}|(A^{*}))\).
Theorem 1
(Dou-Du [2])
For \(A,B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\), \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\), we have the following.
-
(1)
\(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A) |\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(B) \geq\frac {1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho[A,B]]|^{2}\).
-
(2)
\(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A) |\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(B) \geq\frac {1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho\{A_{0},B_{0} \}]|^{2}\).
-
(3)
\(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A) |\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(B) \geq\frac {1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho[A,B]^{0}]|^{2}+\frac{1}{4}| \operatorname{Tr}[\rho\{ A_{0},B_{0} \}^{0} ]|^{2}\).
-
(4)
\(|U_{\rho}|(A) |U_{\rho}|(B) \geq\frac{1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho [A,B]^{0}]|^{2}\), where
$$\begin{aligned}& |U_{\rho}|(A) =\sqrt{ \bigl(\bigl|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}\bigr|(A) \bigr)^{2} - \bigl(\bigl|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}\bigr|(A)-|I_{\rho}|(A) \bigr)^{2}},\\& |I_{\rho}|(A) = \frac{1}{2}\operatorname{Tr} \bigl[ \bigl(i \bigl[ \rho^{1/2},A^{*} \bigr] \bigr) \bigl(i \bigl[\rho^{1/2},A \bigr] \bigr) \bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
3 Quantum Fisher information
A function \(f:(0,+\infty) \rightarrow\mathbb{R}\) is said operator monotone if, for any \(n \in\mathbb{N}\), and \(A, B \in M_{n,+}(\mathbb{C})\) such that \(0 \leq A \leq B\), the inequalities \(0 \leq f(A) \leq f(B)\) hold. An operator monotone function is said symmetric if \(f(x) = xf(x^{-1})\) and normalized if \(f(1) = 1\). The following definitions were given by Hansen and Gibilisco, etc.
Definition 2
\(\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}\) is the class of functions \(f:(0,+\infty) \rightarrow (0,+\infty)\) satisfying
-
(1)
\(f(1) = 1\),
-
(2)
\(tf(t^{-1}) = f(t)\),
-
(3)
f is operator monotone.
For \(f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}\) define \(f(0) = \lim_{x \rightarrow 0}f(x)\). We introduce the sets of regular and non-regular functions
and notice that trivially \(\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}} = \mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r} \cup \mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{n}\).
Definition 3
For \(f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r}\) we define
Proposition 1
([11])
The correspondence \(f \rightarrow\tilde{f}\) is a bijection between \(\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r}\) and \(\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{n}\).
Example 1
In the Kubo-Ando theory of matrix means one associates a mean to each operator monotone function \(f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}\) by the formula
where \(A, B \in M_{n,+}(\mathbb{C})\).
By using the notion of matrix means one may define the class of monotone metrics (also called quantum Fisher information) by the following formula:
where \(L_{\rho}(A) = \rho A\), \(R_{\rho}(A) = A \rho\).
4 Generalized quasi-metric adjusted skew information and correlation measure
Definition 4
Let \(g, f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r}\) satisfy
for some \(k > 0\). We define
By Lemma 5.2 in [12], \({-k \frac {(x-1)^{2}}{f(x)}}\) is operator concave. Then \(\Delta_{g}^{f}(x)\) is also operator concave. Since \(\Delta_{g}^{f}(x) > 0\) for \((0,\infty)\), \(\Delta_{g}^{f}(x)\) is operator monotone.
Definition 5
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\), we define the following quantities:
The quantity \(|I_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A)\) and \(|\operatorname{Corr}_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A,B)\) are called generalized quasi-metric adjusted skew information and generalized quasi-metric adjusted correlation measures, respectively.
Then we have the following proposition.
Proposition 2
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\), we have the following relations:
-
(1)
\(|I_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A) = |I_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A_{0}) = |C_{\rho }^{g}|(A_{0})-|C_{\rho}^{\Delta_{g}^{f}}|(A_{0})\),
-
(2)
\(|J_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A) = |C_{\rho}^{g}|(A_{0})+|C_{\rho}^{\Delta _{g}^{f}}|(A_{0})\),
-
(3)
\(|U_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A) = \sqrt{|I_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A) \cdot |J_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A)}\),
-
(4)
\(|\operatorname{Corr}_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A,B) = |\operatorname{Corr}_{\rho}^{(g,f)}|(A_{0},B_{0})\), where \(A_{0} = A-\operatorname{Tr}[\rho A]I\) and \(B_{0} = B-\operatorname{Tr}[\rho B]I\).
Theorem 2
(Schrödinger type)
For \(f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r}\), we have
where \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\).
Proof of Theorem 1
By Schwarz’s inequality we have
Then we have
□
Theorem 3
(Heisenberg type)
For \(f \in\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{op}}^{r}\), if
for some \(\ell> 0\), then we have
where \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\).
We need the following lemma in order to prove Theorem 3.
Lemma 1
If (1) and (2) is satisfied, then
Proof
□
Proof of Theorem 2
Let \(\{ |{\phi}_{1} \rangle,|{\phi}_{2} \rangle,\ldots,|{\phi}_{n} \rangle \}\) be a basis of eigenvectors of ρ, corresponding to the eigenvalues \(\{ \lambda_{1} ,\lambda_{2} ,\ldots, \lambda_{n} \}\). We put \(a_{jk} = \langle{\phi}_{j} |A_{0}|{\phi}_{k} \rangle\), \(b_{jk} = \langle{\phi}_{j} |B_{0}|{\phi}_{k} \rangle\). Then we have
and
We remark that
and
By Lemma 1 we have
Similarly we have
Therefore
□
Example 2
When
we can show positivity:
and
Then
In particular, for \(\alpha= 1/2\),
In this case we can give some results by Dou-Du as corollaries.
Corollary 1
(Dou-Du (4))
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\),
Corollary 2
(Dou-Du (1), (2))
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\),
-
(1)
\(|V_{\rho}|(A) \cdot|V_{\rho}|(B) \geq |U_{\rho}|(A) \cdot|U_{\rho}|(B) \geq\frac{1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho[A,B]]|^{2}\).
-
(2)
\(|V_{\rho}|(A) \cdot|V_{\rho}|(B) \geq\frac {1}{4}|\operatorname{Tr}[\rho\{ A_{0},B_{0} \}]|^{2}\).
Proof
-
(1)
It is clear by Theorem 3.
-
(2)
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(f(x) = \frac{x+1}{2}\), we define an inner product on \(M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) by
$$\langle A,B \rangle= \operatorname{Tr} \bigl[A_{0}^{*} m_{f}(L_{\rho},R_{\rho})B_{0} \bigr]. $$
By Schwarz’s inequality we have
Then we have
and
Then
By taking \(A^{*}\) in place of A
Since \(|\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A) = |\operatorname{Var}_{\rho}^{0}|(A^{*})\), we have the result. □
5 Remark
Dou-Du’s result (3)
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\),
Corollary 3
For \(A, B \in M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\) and \(\rho\in M_{n,+,1}(\mathbb{C})\),
We cannot compare the RHS of (6) with the RHS of (7). In fact, let
Since the RHS of \((\mbox{6}) = 0\) and the RHS of \((\mbox{7}) = \frac{9}{16}\), we have the RHS of (6) < the RHS of (7). On the other hand let
Since the RHS of \((\mbox{6}) = 1\) and the RHS of \((\mbox{7}) = 0\), we have the RHS of (6) > the RHS of (7).
6 Conclusion
The results (1), (4) of Dou-Du are given as corollaries of Theorem 3. Result (2) is proved by Schwarz’s inequality. Also is shown, that (3) cannot be compared with our result.
References
Dou, YN, Du, HK: Generalizations of the Heisenberg and Schrödinger uncertainty relations. J. Math. Phys. 54, 103508 (2013)
Dou, YN, Du, HK: Note on the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 952-958 (2014)
Furuichi, S, Yanagi, K: Schrödinger uncertainty relation, Wigner-Yanase-Dyson skew information and metric adjusted correlation measure. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 388, 1147-1156 (2012)
Lieb, EH: Convex trace functions and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson conjecture. Adv. Math. 11, 267-288 (1973)
Luo, S, Zhang, Q: On skew information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 50, 1778-1782 (2004); Correction to ‘On skew information’. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51, 4432 (2005)
Kosaki, H: Matrix trace inequality related to uncertainty principle. Int. J. Math. 16, 629-646 (2005)
Yanagi, K, Furuichi, S, Kuriyama, K: A generalized skew information and uncertainty relation. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51, 4401-4404 (2005)
Hansen, F: Metric adjusted skew information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9909-9916 (2008)
Yanagi, K: Metric adjusted skew information and uncertainty relation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 380, 888-892 (2011)
Yanagi, K, Furuichi, S, Kuriyama, K: Uncertainty relations for generalized metric adjusted skew information and generalized metric adjusted correlation measure. J. Uncertain. Anal. Appl. 1, 1-14 (2013)
Gibilisco, P, Hansen, F, Isola, T: On a correspondence between regular and nonregular operator monotone functions. Linear Algebra Appl. 430, 2225-2232 (2009)
Hiai, F, Petz, D: Convexity of qusi-entropy type functions: Lieb’s and Ando’s convexity theorems revisited. J. Math. Phys. 54, 062201 (2013)
Acknowledgements
The first author (KY) was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26400119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
This work was carried out in collaboration between all authors. Example 2 and the comparison between (6) and (7) were given by KS. With the exception of them, the proofs of all results were given by KY. All authors have contributed to, checked, and approved the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Yanagi, K., Sekikawa, K. Non-hermitian extensions of Heisenberg type and Schrödinger type uncertainty relations. J Inequal Appl 2015, 381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0895-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0895-x