 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Common fixed points in partially ordered modular function spaces
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 78 (2014)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to study the existence and uniqueness of common fixed point results in partially ordered modular function spaces.
MSC:47H10, 54H25, 54C60, 46B40.
1 Introduction
Study of modular spaces was initiated by Nakano [1] in connection with the theory of order spaces which was further generalized by Musielak and Orlicz [2]. The study of fixed points of mappings on complete metric spaces equipped with a partial ordering ⪯ was first investigated in 2004 by Ran and Reurings [3], and then by Nieto and RodriguezLopez [4]. They applied their results to obtain a unique solution for a first order ordinary differential equation with periodic boundary conditions (see also [5]). The study of this theory in the context of modular function spaces was initiated by Khamsi et al. [6] (see also [7] and [8]). Kuaket and Kumam [9] and Mongkolkeha and Kumam [10–12], considered and proved some fixed point and common fixed point results for generalized contraction mappings in modular spaces. Also, Kumam [13] obtained some fixed point theorems for nonexpansive mappings in arbitrary modular spaces. Recently, Kutabi and Latif [14] studied fixed points of multivalued maps in modular function spaces.
The study of common fixed points of mappings satisfying certain contractive conditions in the setup of partially ordered metric spaces can be employed to establish the existence of solutions of many types of operator equations, such as differential and integral equations. There are a few examples given in the following papers: [15–20] and references mentioned therein. The objective of this paper is to initiate the study of common fixed point results in partially ordered modular function spaces. As an application of our results, we study the property Q for mappings involved herein.
2 Preliminaries
Some basic facts and notations about modular spaces are recalled from [21].
Definition 2.1 Let X be a real (or complex) vector space. A functional \rho :X\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}] is called modular if, for any x, y in X, the following hold:
(m_{1}) \rho (x)=0 if and only if x=0.
(m_{2}) \rho (\alpha x)=\rho (x) for every scalar α with \alpha =1.
(m_{3}) \rho (\alpha x+\beta y)\le \rho (x)+\rho (y) provided that \alpha +\beta =1, and \alpha ,\beta \ge 0.
If (m_{3}) is replaced by \rho (\alpha x+\beta y)\le \alpha \rho (x)+\beta \rho (y) if \alpha +\beta =1, and \alpha ,\beta \ge 0, then ρ is called convex modular.
The vector space {X}_{\rho} given by
is called a modular space. Generally, the modular ρ is not subadditive and therefore does not behave as a norm or a distance.
Modular space {X}_{\rho} can be equipped with an Fnorm defined by
If ρ is convex modular, then
defines a norm on the modular space {X}_{\rho} and is called the Luxemburg norm.
Define the ρball, centered at x\in {X}_{\rho} with radius r, as
Definition 2.2 A function modular is said to satisfy {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}type condition, if there exists K>0 such that for any x\in {X}_{\rho}, we have \rho (2x)\le K\rho (x).
Definition 2.3 ρ is said to satisfy the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}condition if \rho (2{x}_{n})\to 0 whenever \rho ({x}_{n})\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}.
Definition 2.4 Let {X}_{\rho} be a modular space. The sequence \{{x}_{n}\}\subset {X}_{\rho} is called:
(t_{1}) ρconvergent to x\in {X}_{\rho}, if \rho ({x}_{n}x)\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}.
(t_{2}) ρCauchy, if \rho ({x}_{n}{x}_{m})\to 0 as n and m\to \mathrm{\infty}.
Note that ρconvergence does not imply ρCauchy since ρ does not satisfy the triangle inequality. In fact, one can show that this will happen if and only if ρ satisfies the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}type condition.
It is well known that [6, 22] under the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}condition the norm convergence and modular convergence are equivalent. The same is true when we deal with the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}type condition. Throughout this paper, we assume that modular function ρ is convex and satisfies the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}type condition. We also state the following definition and results given in [7].
Definition 2.5 The growth function {w}_{\rho} of a function modular ρ is defined as
Observe that {w}_{\rho}(t)\le 1 for all t\in [0,1].
Lemma 2.6 The growth function ω has the following properties:
(g_{1}) \omega (t)<\mathrm{\infty}, for each t\in [0,\mathrm{\infty}).
(g_{2}) \omega :[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a convex, strictly increasing function. So, it is continuous.
(g_{3}) \omega (\alpha \beta )\le \omega (\alpha )\omega (\beta ); for all \alpha ,\beta \in [0,\mathrm{\infty}).
(g_{4}) {\omega}^{1}(\alpha ){\omega}^{1}(\beta )\le {\omega}^{1}(\alpha \beta ); for all \alpha \beta \in [0,\mathrm{\infty}), where {\omega}^{1} is the inverse function of ω.
The following lemma shows that the growth function can be used to give an upper bound for {\parallel x\parallel}_{\rho} for each x\in {X}_{\rho}.
Lemma 2.7 Let ρ be a convex modular function satisfying the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}type condition. Then
whenever x\in {X}_{\rho}.
Let S and T be two selfmaps on a modular function space {X}_{\rho}. A point x\in {X}_{\rho} is called (1) a fixed point of S if S(x)=x; (2) a coincidence point of a pair (S,T) if Sx=Tx; (3) a common fixed point of a pair (S,T) if x=Sx=Tx. If w=Sx=Tx for some x in {X}_{\rho}, then w is called a point of coincidence of S and T.
The pair (S,T) is said to be compatible if \rho (ST{x}_{n}TS{x}_{n})\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, whenever \{{x}_{n}\} is a sequence in X such that \{S{x}_{n}\} and \{T{x}_{n}\} are ρconvergent to t\in {X}_{\rho}.
A pair (S,T) is said to be ρweakly compatible if S and T commute at their coincidence points.
We denote the set of fixed points of S by Fix(S).
Definition 2.8 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially modular ordered space. A pair ({T}_{1},{T}_{2}) of selfmaps of {X}_{\rho} is said to be ρweakly increasing if {T}_{1}(f)\le {T}_{2}{T}_{1}(f) and {T}_{2}(f)\le {T}_{1}{T}_{2}(f) for all f\in {X}_{\rho}.
Definition 2.9 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially modular ordered space and {T}_{1}, {T}_{2} be two selfmaps on {X}_{\rho}. An order pair ({T}_{1},{T}_{2}) is said to be partially ρweakly increasing if {T}_{1}(f)\le {T}_{2}{T}_{1}(f) for all f\in {X}_{\rho}.
The pair ({T}_{1},{T}_{2}) is ρweakly increasing if and only if the ordered pairs ({T}_{1},{T}_{2}) and ({T}_{2},{T}_{1}) are partially ρweakly increasing.
Definition 2.10 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially modular ordered space. A mapping {T}_{1} is said to be ρweak annihilator of {T}_{2} if {T}_{1}{T}_{2}(f)\le f for all f\in {x}_{\rho}.
Definition 2.11 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially ordered modular space. A mapping {T}_{1} is said to be ρdominating if f\le {T}_{1}f for all f\in {X}_{\rho}.
Definition 2.12 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially modular ordered space and {T}_{1}, {T}_{2}, {T}_{3} be three selfmaps on {X}_{\rho}, such that {T}_{1}{X}_{\rho}\subseteq {T}_{3}{X}_{\rho} and {T}_{2}{X}_{\rho}\subseteq {T}_{3}{X}_{\rho}. We say that {T}_{1} and {T}_{2} are ρweakly increasing with respect to {T}_{3} if and only if for all f\in {X}_{\rho}, we have {T}_{1}f\le {T}_{2}g for all g\in {T}_{3}^{1}({T}_{1}f), and {T}_{2}f\le {T}_{1}g, for all g\in {T}_{3}^{1}({T}_{2}f), where {T}_{3}^{1}(f)=\{h\in {X}_{\rho}\mid {T}_{3}h=f\} for all f\in {X}_{\rho}.
Definition 2.13 Let ({X}_{\rho},\preccurlyeq ) be a partially modular ordered space and {T}_{1}, {T}_{2} ,{T}_{3} be three selfmaps on {X}_{\rho} such that {T}_{1}{X}_{\rho}\subseteq {T}_{3}{X}_{\rho}. We say that {T}_{1} and {T}_{2} are partially ρweakly increasing with respect to {T}_{3} if for all f\in {X}_{\rho}, we have {T}_{1}f\le {T}_{2}g, for all g\in {T}_{3}^{1}({T}_{1}f).
Definition 2.14 Let X be a vector space. Then (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) is called an ordered modular function space iff: (i) ρ is convex modular function on X and (ii) ⪯ is a partial order on X.
Let (X,\u2aaf) be a partial ordered set. Then x,y\in X are called comparable if x\u2aafy or y\u2aafx holds.
3 Common fixed point results
We begin with a common fixed point theorem for two pairs of partially weakly increasing functions on an ordered modular function spaces. It may regarded as the main result of this article.
Theorem 3.1 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S, I, T, and J selfmaps on {X}_{\rho} such that S({X}_{\rho})\subseteq J({X}_{\rho}) and I({X}_{\rho})\subseteq T({X}_{\rho}). Suppose that (J,S) and (I,T) are ρweakly increasing, and the dominating maps S and T are weak annihilators of J and I, respectively. If for every two comparable elements f,g\in {X}_{\rho}
is satisfied, then S, I, T, and J have a common fixed point provided that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{f}_{n}\} with {f}_{n}\le {g}_{n} for all n and {g}_{n}\to g implies that {f}_{n}\le g and either

(a)
\{S,I\} are ρcompatible, S or I is ρcontinuous and \{T,J\} are ρweakly compatible;

(b)
\{T,J\} are ρcompatible, T or J is ρcontinuous and \{S,I\} are ρweakly compatible.
Moreover, the set of common fixed points of S, I, T, and J is well ordered if and only if S, I, T, and J have one and only one common fixed point.
Proof (a) Let {f}_{0}\in {X}_{\rho}. Construct sequences {f}_{n} and {g}_{n} in {X}_{\rho}, such that {g}_{2n1}=S{f}_{2n2}=J{f}_{2n1} and {g}_{2n}=T{f}_{2n1}=I{f}_{2n}. This can be done because S({X}_{\rho})\subseteq J({X}_{\rho}) and I({X}_{\rho})\subseteq T({X}_{\rho}). Since S is a ρdominating map and the pair (J,S) is partially ρweakly increasing so {f}_{2n2}\le S{f}_{2n2}=J{f}_{2n1}\le S(J{f}_{2n1}). Also, S is a ρweak annihilator of J so {f}_{2n2}\le S{f}_{2n2}=J{f}_{2n1}\le S(J{f}_{2n1})\le {f}_{2n1}. This implies that {f}_{2n2}\le {f}_{2n1}. Since T is a dominating map, {f}_{2n1}\le T{f}_{2n1}=I{f}_{2n}. As (I,T) is a pair of partially weakly increasing mappings, I{f}_{2n}\le T(I{f}_{2n}) and {f}_{2n1}\le T{f}_{2n1}=I{f}_{2n}\le T(I{f}_{2n}). Also T is a weak annihilator of I, so we have {f}_{2n1}\le T{f}_{2n1}=I{f}_{2n}\le T(I{f}_{2n})\le {f}_{2n}. This implies that {f}_{2n1}\le {f}_{2n}. Hence for all n\ge 1 we have {f}_{n}\le {f}_{n+1}. Suppose that \rho ({g}_{2n}{g}_{2n+1})>0 for every n. If not, then \rho ({g}_{2n}{g}_{2n+1})=0 implies that {g}_{2n}{g}_{2n+1}=0, that is, {g}_{2n}={g}_{2n+1} for some n. Now from inequality (3.1) we have
and therefore \rho ({g}_{2n+1}{g}_{2n+2})=0. So {g}_{2n+1}={g}_{2n+2} and so on. Thus \{{g}_{n}\} becomes a constant sequence and {g}_{2n} is a required common fixed point of given mappings. Assume that \rho ({g}_{2n+1}{g}_{2n+2})\ne 0 for each n. From (3.1), we obtain
Inductively, we have \rho ({g}_{2n+1}{g}_{2n+2})\le {\alpha}^{n}\rho ({g}_{n+1}{g}_{n+2}), which implies that
Using Lemma 2.7, we have
and
Employing the properties of the growth function, we obtain
which implies that
As \omega (1)=1, and \alpha \u22d61 so 1\u22d6{\omega}^{1}(\frac{1}{\alpha}), and \frac{1}{{\omega}^{1}(\frac{1}{\alpha})}<1. This shows that \{{g}_{2n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in ({X}_{\rho},{\parallel \cdot \parallel}_{\rho}). There exists h\in {X}_{\rho} such that {\parallel {g}_{2n}h\parallel}_{\rho}\to 0. That is, the sequence \{{g}_{2n}\} is norm convergent to h\in {X}_{\rho}. Since the {\mathrm{\Delta}}_{2}condition implies equivalence of norm and modular convergence, \{{g}_{2n}\} is modular convergent to h\in {X}_{\rho}. Therefore \{{g}_{2n}\}\stackrel{\rho}{\to}h. Thus, we have h={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{g}_{2n+1}={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}J{f}_{2n+1}={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}S{f}_{2n} and h={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{g}_{2n+2}={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}T{f}_{2n+1}={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}I{f}_{2n+2}. Assume that I is continuous. Since \{S,I\} are ρcompatible, we have {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}SI{f}_{2n+2}={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}IS{f}_{2n+2}=Ih. As T is a ρdominating map, {f}_{2n+1}\le T{f}_{2n+1}=I{f}_{2n+2}, that is, {f}_{2n+1}\le I{f}_{2n+2}. Therefore we have
which on taking the limit as n\to \mathrm{\infty} gives \rho (Ihh)\le \alpha \rho (Ihh). That is, (1\alpha )\rho (Ihh)\le 0. As \alpha <1, so \rho (Ihh)\le 0 implies that Ih=h. Since T is ρdominating, {f}_{2n+1}\le T{f}_{2n+1}. Also, T{f}_{2n+1}={g}_{2n+2}\to h as n\to \mathrm{\infty} implies that {f}_{2n+1}\le h. So, we have
On taking the limit as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, we obtain
Hence \rho (Shh)=0 and Sh=h. As S({X}_{\rho})\subseteq J({X}_{\rho}), there exists a point k\in {X}_{\rho} such that Sh=Jk. Suppose that Tk\ne Jk. Since S is ρdominating, (J,S) is partially ρweakly increasing, and S is a ρweak annihilator of J, so we have h\le Sh=Jk\le SJk\le k, that is, h\le k. Thus, we have
giving h=Tk. Since \{T,J\} are ρweakly compatible, Th=TSh=TJk=JTk=Jh. Thus h is a coincidence point of T and J. As S is a ρdominating map, {f}_{2n}\le S{f}_{2n}. Now S{f}_{2n}\to h as n\to \mathrm{\infty} implies that {f}_{2n}\le h. Now from (3.1), we have
which, on taking the limit as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, gives
or (1\alpha )\rho (hTh)\le 0, as \alpha <1, so h=Th. Thus, Sh=Ih=Th=Jh=h. That is, h is a common fixed point of S, T, I, and J.
(b) Similarly the result follows when (b) holds.
Now suppose that the set of common fixed points of S, I, T, and J is well ordered. We claim that the common fixed point of S, I, T, and J is unique. Assume to the contrary that these maps have two common fixed points u and v, that is,
From inequality (3.1), we have
Thus
Hence uniqueness is proved. The converse is straightforward. □
Corollary 3.2 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S, I, and J selfmaps on X such that S(X)\subseteq J(X), and I(X)\subseteq S(X). Suppose that (J,S) and (I,S) are partially ρweakly increasing and the dominating map S is a weak annihilator of J and I. If for every two comparable elements f,g\in X
is satisfied, then S, I, and J have a common fixed point provided that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{f}_{n}\} with {f}_{n}\le {g}_{n} for all n and {g}_{n}\to g implies that {f}_{n}\le g and either

(a)
\{S,I\} are ρcompatible, S or I is ρcontinuous and \{S,J\} are ρweakly compatible;

(b)
\{S,J\} are ρcompatible, S or J is ρcontinuous and \{S,I\} are ρweakly compatible.
Moreover, the set of the common fixed points of S, I, and J is well ordered if and only if S, I, and J have one and only one common fixed point.
Corollary 3.3 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S, T, and J selfmaps on X such that S({L}_{\rho})\subseteq J({L}_{\rho}) and J({L}_{\rho})\subseteq T({L}_{\rho}). Suppose that (J,S) and (J,T) are partially ρweakly increasing, and the dominating maps S and T are weak annihilators of J. If for every two comparable elements f,g\in {L}_{\rho}
is satisfied, then S, T, and J have a common fixed point provided that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{f}_{n}\} with {f}_{n}\le {g}_{n} for all n and {g}_{n}\to g implies that {f}_{n}\le g and either

(a)
\{S,J\} are ρcompatible, S or J is ρcontinuous and \{T,J\} are ρweakly compatible;

(b)
\{T,J\} are ρcompatible, T or J is ρcontinuous and \{S,J\} are ρweakly compatible.
Moreover, the set of common fixed points of S, T, and J is well ordered if and only if S, T, and J have one and only one common fixed point.
Corollary 3.4 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space, S and J selfmaps on X such that S({L}_{\rho})\subseteq J({L}_{\rho}) and J({L}_{\rho})\subseteq S({L}_{\rho}). Suppose that (J,S) is a partially ρweakly increasing and the dominating map S is a weak annihilator of J. If for every two comparable elements f,g\in {L}_{\rho}
is satisfied, then S and J have a common fixed point provided that for a nondecreasing sequence \{{f}_{n}\} with {f}_{n}\le {g}_{n} for all n and {g}_{n}\to g it is implied that {f}_{n}\le g and either \{S,J\} are ρcompatible, S or J is ρcontinuous and \{S,J\} are ρweakly compatible. Moreover, the set of common fixed points of S and J is well ordered if and only if S and J have one and only one common fixed point.
Theorem 3.5 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S, T, I, and J continuous selfmaps on {X}_{\rho}. Suppose that (S,I) and (T,J) are ρcompatible, (S,T) and (T,S) are ρpartially weakly increasing with respect to J and I, respectively, and
holds for every f,g\in {X}_{\rho} for which If and Jg are comparable. Then the pairs (S,I) and (T,J) have a coincidence point h\in X. Moreover if Ih and Jh are comparable, then h\in X is a coincidence point of S, T, I, and J.
Proof Let {f}_{0} be an arbitrary point in X. Construct the sequences \{{f}_{n}\} and \{{g}_{n}\} in X such that {g}_{2n}=S{f}_{2n}=J{f}_{2n+1} and {g}_{2n+1}=T{f}_{2n+1}=I{f}_{2n+2}. As (S,T) is ρpartially weakly increasing with respect to J, from {f}_{2n+1}\in {J}^{1}(S{f}_{2n}) we have
Since (T,S) is ρpartially weakly increasing with respect to I, from {f}_{2n+2}\in {I}^{1}(T{f}_{2n+1}), we have
Hence J{f}_{1}\le I{f}_{2}\le J{f}_{3}\le \cdots \le J{f}_{2n+1}\le I{f}_{2n+2}\le J{f}_{2n+3}\le \cdots , that is, {g}_{0}\le {g}_{1}\le {g}_{2}\le \cdots \le {g}_{2n}\le {g}_{2n+1}\le {g}_{2n+2}\cdots . Following similar arguments to those given in Theorem 3.1, we obtain {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho ({g}_{n}{g}_{n+1})=0 and \{{g}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence. Now we show the existence of the coincidence point for the pairs (S,I) and (T,J). To prove this, we proceed as follows: Since X is complete, there exists h\in {X}_{\rho} such that {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{g}_{n}=h. That is, {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (I{f}_{2n}h) = {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (S{f}_{2n}h) = {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (I{f}_{2n+2}h) = {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (T{f}_{2n+1}h) = {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (J{f}_{2n+1}h)=0. By compatibility of (S,I) and (T,J), we have
By continuity of S, T, I, and J, we have {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (S(I{f}_{2n})Sh)={lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\rho (T(J{f}_{2n+1})Th)=0. Note that
which on taking the limit as n\to \mathrm{\infty} implies that \rho (IhSh)=0, that is, IhSh=0 and Ih=Sh. Similarly,
which on taking the limit as n\to \mathrm{\infty} implies that \rho (JhTh)=0, that is, JhTh=0 and Jh=Th. Next we show that Jh=Ih. Assume to the contrary Jh\ne Ih, that is, \rho (IhJh)>0. By the given assumption, we have
a contradiction. Hence Jh=Ih, therefore, Sh=Th=Ih=Jh. Hence h is a coincidence point of S, I, T, and J. □
Corollary 3.6 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S and T, continuous selfmaps on {X}_{\rho}, (S,T) and (T,S) are ρpartially weakly increasing with respect to identity mapping on X, and
holds for every f,g\in {X}_{\rho} for which f and g are comparable. Then the pair (S,T) has a common fixed point.
Corollary 3.7 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space and S and J continuous selfmaps on {X}_{\rho}. Suppose that (S,J) is ρcompatible, S is ρpartially weakly increasing with respect to J, and
holds for every f,g\in {X}_{\rho} for which Jf and Jg are comparable. Then the pair (S,J) has a coincidence point h∈ X.
Example 3.8 Assume that {X}_{\rho}={\ell}^{1}, where \rho (x)=\parallel x\parallel for x\in {\ell}^{1}. For x,y\in {\ell}^{1}, define x\u2aafy if and only if x\ge y.
Let S,J:{\ell}^{1}\to {\ell}^{1} be defined as
Note that
That is,
Note that ρcompatibility of (S,J) follows immediately. Also S is ρweakly partially increasing with respect to J. Indeed, S({X}_{\rho})\subseteq J({X}_{\rho}) and Sf\u2aafSg for all g\in {J}^{1}(Sf). Therefore all conditions of Corollary 3.7 are satisfied. However, the pair (S,J) has (0,0,0,\dots ,0,\dots ) as a coincidence and a common fixed point.
4 Periodic point results
If S is a map which has a fixed point f, then f is also a fixed point of {S}^{n} for every natural number n. However, the converse is false. If a map satisfies F(S)=F({S}^{n}) for each n\in N, where F(S) denotes a set of all fixed point of S, then it is said to have property P [23]. We shall say that S and T have property Q if F(S)\cap F(T)=F({S}^{n})\cap F({T}^{n}). The set O(T,\mathrm{\infty})=\{f,Tf,{T}^{2}f,\dots \} is called the orbit of T. The set O(T,S,\mathrm{\infty})=\{f,Tf,Sf,{T}^{2}f,{S}^{2}f,\dots \} is called the orbit of T and S.
As an application of our results in Section 2, we provide the following periodic point theorems.
Theorem 4.1 Let S be a nondecreasing selfmap of a complete ordered modular function space (X,\u2aaf,\rho ), satisfying
for all f\in X, or (ii) with strict inequality, \alpha =1 and for all f\in X, f\ne Sf. If, F(S)\ne \varphi, then S has property P provided that f\u2aafSf for any f\in F({S}^{n}).
Proof We shall always assume that n>1, since the statement for n=1 is trivial. Let f\in F({S}^{n}). Then f\u2aafSf, so a nondecreasing characteristic of the mapping S implies that O(f,\mathrm{\infty}) is a wellordered subset of X. Suppose that S satisfies (i). Then
Now the righthand side of the above inequality approaches zero as n\to \mathrm{\infty}. Hence \rho (fSf)=0, and f=Sf. Suppose that S satisfies (ii). If Sf=f, then there is nothing to prove. Suppose, if possible, that Sf\ne f. Then a repetition of the argument for case (i) leads to
a contradiction. Therefore, in all cases, f=Sf. □
Theorem 4.2 Let (X,\u2aaf,\rho ) be a complete ordered modular function space. Let the mappings S and T be as in Corollary 3.6. Then S and T have property Q provided that O(T,S,\mathrm{\infty}) for every f\in F({S}^{n})\cap F({T}^{n}).
Proof From Corollary 3.6, S and T have a common fixed point in X. Let f\in F({S}^{n})\cap F({T}^{n}). Now,
and we have
Now the righthand side of the above inequality approaches zero as n\to \mathrm{\infty}. Hence \rho (fSf)=0, and f=Sf. Now,
give \rho (fTf)=0, and f=Tf. □
Remark Recently, Paknazar et al. [24] gave the existence of the solutions of the integral equations in modular function spaces. Hajji and Hanebaly [25] also applied their fixed point result to obtain the solution of perturbed integral equations in modular function spaces (see also [26]). Our results can also be employed to solve such integral equations in the framework of complete ordered modular function spaces.
References
Nakano H: Modulared SemiOrdered Spaces. Maruzen, Tokyo; 1950.
Musielak J, Orlicz W: On modular spaces. Stud. Math. 1959, 18: 591–597.
Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002993903072204
Nieto JJ, RodriguezLopez R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005, 22: 223–239. 10.1007/s1108300590185
Nieto JJ, RodriguezLopez R: Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Acta Math. Sin. 2007,23(12):2205–2212. 10.1007/s1011400507690
Khamsi MA, Kozolowski WK, Reich S: Fixed point theory in modular function spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 1990, 14: 935–953. 10.1016/0362546X(90)90111S
Benavides TD, Khamsi MA, Samadi S: Asymptotically regular mappings in modular function spaces. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2001, 53: 295–304.
Khamsi MA: A convexity property in modular function spaces. Math. Jpn. 1996, 44: 269–279.
Kuaket K, Kumam P: Fixed points of asymptotic pointwise contractions in modular spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1795–1798. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.035
Mongkolkeha C, Kumam P: Fixed point and common fixed point theorems for generalized weak contraction mappings of integral type in modular spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2011., 2011: Article ID 705943
Mongkolkeha C, Kumam P: Common fixed points for generalized weak contraction mappings in modular spaces. Sci. Math. Jpn. 2012, e2012: 117–127.
Mongkolkeha C, Kumam P: Some fixed point results for generalized weak contraction mappings in modular spaces. Int. J. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 247378 10.1155/2013/247378
Kumam P: Fixed point theorem for nonexpansive mappings in modular spaces. Arch. Math. 2004, 40: 345–353.
Kutbi MA, Latif A: Fixed points of multivalued mappings in modular function spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2009., 2009: Article ID 786357
Abbas M, Khamsi MA, Khan AR: Common fixed point and invariant approximation in hyperbolic ordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 25
Abbas M, Khan AR, Nemeth SZ: Complementarity problems via common fixed points in vector lattices. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 60
Abbas M, Nazir T, Radenovic S: Common fixed points of four maps in partially ordered metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 1520–1526. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.03.038
Altun I, Damjanovic B, Djoric D: Fixed point and common fixed point theorems on ordered cone metric spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 310–316. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.016
Esmaily J, Vaezpour SM, Rhoades BE: Coincidence point theorem for generalized weakly contractions in ordered metric spaces. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 219: 1536–1548. 10.1016/j.amc.2012.07.054
Harandi AA, Emami H: A fixed point theorem for contraction type maps in partially ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72: 2238–2242. 10.1016/j.na.2009.10.023
Kozlowski WM: Modular Function Spaces. Dekker, New York; 1988.
Khamsi MA: Fixed point theory in modular function spaces. In Recent Advances on Metric Fixed Point Theory. Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla; 1996:31–58.
Jeong GS, Rhoades BE:Maps for which F(T)=F({T}^{n}). Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2005, 6: 87–131.
Paknazar M, Eshaghi M, Cho YJ, Vaezpour SM: A Patatype fixed point theorem in modular spaces with application. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 239
Hajji A, Hanebaly E: Perturbed integral equations in modular function spaces. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2003., 2003: Article ID 20
Taleb AA, Hanebaly E: A fixed point theorem and its application to integral equations in modular function spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1999, 127: 2335–2342. 10.1090/S0002993999047796
Acknowledgements
The authors were supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission (NRUCSEC No. NRU56000508). The authors are also thankful to the reviewers for their suggestions and remarks, which improved the presentation of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Abbas, M., Ali, S. & Kumam, P. Common fixed points in partially ordered modular function spaces. J Inequal Appl 2014, 78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X201478
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X201478
Keywords
 fixed point
 ordered modular function space