Skip to main content

An inequality for q-integral and its applications

Abstract

In this paper, we use the q-binomial theorem to establish an inequality for the q-integral. As applications of the inequality, we give some sufficient conditions for convergence of the q-integral.

MSC:26D15, 33D15.

1 Introduction and main result

q-Series, which are also called basic hypergeometric series, play a very important role in many fields, such as affine root systems, Lie algebras and groups, number theory, orthogonal polynomials, physics, etc. The inequality technique is one of the useful tools in the study of special functions. There are many papers about the inequalities and q-integral; see [110]. Convergence is the key problem of a q-series. In order to give some new methods for convergence of a q-series, we derive an inequality for the q-integral with the basic hypergeometric series ϕ r r + 1 . Some applications of the inequality are also given. The main result of this paper is the following inequality.

Theorem 1.1 Suppose a i , b i , t be any real numbers such that |t|< ( i = 1 r + 1 M i ) 1 and b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Then we have

| 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | t | ( 1 | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) ,
(1.1)

where b r + 1 =0, M i =max{1, | 1 a i | 1 b i } for i=1,2,,r+1.

Before we present the proof of the theorem, we recall some definitions, notation, and known results which will be used in this paper. Throughout the whole paper, it is supposed that 0<q<1. The q-shifted factorials are defined as

( a ; q ) 0 =1, ( a ; q ) n = k = 0 n 1 ( 1 a q k ) , ( a ; q ) = k = 0 ( 1 a q k ) .
(1.2)

We also adopt the following compact notation for a multiple q-shifted factorial:

( a 1 , a 2 , , a m ; q ) n = ( a 1 ; q ) n ( a 2 ; q ) n ( a m ; q ) n ,
(1.3)

where n is an integer or ∞.

The q-binomial theorem is [11, 12]

k = 0 ( a ; q ) k z k ( q ; q ) k = ( a z ; q ) ( z ; q ) ,|z|<1.
(1.4)

Heine introduced the ϕ r r + 1 basic hypergeometric series, which is defined by [11, 12]

ϕ r r + 1 ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) = n = 0 ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 ; q ) n z n ( q , b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q ) n .
(1.5)

Jackson defined the q-integral by [13]

0 d f(t) d q t=d(1q) n = 0 f ( d q n ) q n
(1.6)

and

c d f(t) d q t= 0 d f(t) d q t 0 c f(t) d q t.
(1.7)

In [14], the author gives the following inequality.

Theorem 1.2 Suppose a i , b i and z be any real numbers such that |z|< ( i = 1 r + 1 M i ) 1 , b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Then we have

| r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) | 1 ( | z | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) ,
(1.8)

where b r + 1 =0, M i =max{1, | 1 a i | 1 b i } for i=1,2,,r+1.

As an application of (1.8), the author give the following sufficient condition for convergence of q-series [14].

Theorem 1.3 Suppose a i , b i , t be any real numbers such that |t|<1 and b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Let { c n } be any number series. If

lim n | c n + 1 c n | =p<1,

then the q-series

n = 0 c n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , t q n )
(1.9)

converges absolutely.

2 Proof of theorem

In this section, we use Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 to prove Theorem 1.1.

Proof First we point out that, under the conditions of Theorem 1.1, the q-integral

0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z
(2.1)

converges absolutely.

In fact, by the definition of q-integral (1.6), we get

0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z = t ( 1 q ) n = 0 q n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , t q n ) .
(2.2)

Using Theorem 1.3 and noticing

lim n q n + 1 q n =q<1,

we see that the q-integral (2.1) converges absolutely.

Letting z=t q n in (1.8) gives

| r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , t q n ) | 1 ( | t | q n i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) ,
(2.3)

where b r + 1 =0, M i =max{1, | 1 a i | 1 b i } for i=1,2,,r+1.

Using the definition of q-integral (1.6) again one gets

| 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | t | ( 1 q ) n = 0 q n | r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , t q n ) | | t | ( 1 q ) n = 0 q n ( | t | q n i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) = | t | ( 1 q ) ( | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) n = 0 ( | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) n q n | t | ( 1 q ) ( | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) n = 0 ( | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) n q n ( q ; q ) n .
(2.4)

Employing the q-binomial theorem (1.4) gives

n = 0 ( | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) n q n ( q ; q ) n = ( q | t | i = 1 r + 1 M i ; q ) ( q ; q ) .
(2.5)

Substituting (2.5) into (2.4), we get (1.1). □

Corollary 2.1 Suppose a i , b i , c, d be any real numbers such that |c|< ( i = 1 r + 1 M i ) 1 , |d|< ( i = 1 r + 1 M i ) 1 and b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Then we have

| c d r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | d | + | c | 2 | d c | i = 1 r + 1 M i ( 1 | d | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( 1 | c | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) .
(2.6)

Proof By the definition of q-integral (1.7), we get

| c d r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | = | 0 d r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z 0 c r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | 0 d r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | + | 0 c r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | d | ( 1 | d | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) + | c | ( 1 | c | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) = | d | + | c | 2 | d c | i = 1 r + 1 M i ( 1 | d | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( 1 | c | i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) .
(2.7)

Thus, the inequality (2.6) holds. □

3 Some applications of the inequality

In this section, we use the inequality obtained in this paper to give a sufficient condition for convergence of a q-series. Convergence is an important problem in the study of a q-series. There are some results about it. For example, Ito used an inequality technique to give a sufficient condition for the convergence of a special q-series called the Jackson integral [15].

Theorem 3.1 Suppose a i , b i are any real numbers such that b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Let { c n } be any number series. If

lim n | c n + 1 c n | =p< 1 q ,

then the q-series

n = 0 c n 0 q n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z
(3.1)

converges absolutely.

Proof Since

lim n q n =0,
(3.2)

there exists an integer N 0 such that, when n> N 0 ,

q n < ( i = 1 r + 1 M i ) 1 ,
(3.3)

where b r + 1 =0, M i =max{1, | 1 a i | 1 b i } for i=1,2,,r+1.

When n> N 0 , letting t= q n in (1.1) gives

| 0 q n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | q n ( 1 q n i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) .
(3.4)

Multiplying both sides of (3.4) by | c n | one gets

| c n 0 q n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z | | c n | q n ( 1 q n i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q ) .
(3.5)

The ratio test shows that the series

n = 0 c n q n ( 1 q n i = 1 r + 1 M i ) ( q 2 ; q )

is absolutely convergent. From (3.5), it is sufficient to establish that (3.1) is absolutely convergent. □

Corollary 3.2 Suppose a i , b i are any real numbers such that b i <1 with i=1,2,,r. Then the q-integral

0 1 d q t 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z
(3.6)

is absolutely convergent. Here

0 1 d q t 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z = 0 1 [ 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z ] d q t .
(3.7)

Proof By the definition of q-integral (1.7), we get

0 1 d q t 0 t r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z = ( 1 q ) n = 0 q n 0 q n r + 1 ϕ r ( a 1 , a 2 , , a r + 1 b 1 , b 2 , , b r ; q , z ) d q z .
(3.8)

Since

lim n | q n + 1 q n | =q< 1 q ,

from the theorem, we know that (3.6) is absolutely convergent. □

References

  1. Anderson GD, Barnard RW, Vamanamurthy KC, Vuorinen M: Inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 1995,347(5):1713–1723. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1995-1264800-3

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aral A, Gupta V, Agarwal RP: Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory Applications. Springer, Berlin; 2013.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao J: Notes on Askey-Roy integral and certain generating functions for q -polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2014,409(1):435–445. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.07.034

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ernst, T: The history of q-calculus and a new method. Licentiate Thesis, U.U.D. M Report (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giordano C, Laforgia A, Pečarić J: Supplements to known inequalities for some special functions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1996, 200: 34–41. 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0188

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano C, Laforgia A, Pečarić J: Unified treatment of Gautschi-Kershaw type inequalities for the gamma function. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1998, 99: 167–175. 10.1016/S0377-0427(98)00154-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano C, Laforgia A: Inequalities and monotonicity properties for the gamma function. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2001, 133: 387–396. 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00659-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano C, Laforgia A: On the Bernstein-type inequalities for ultraspherical polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2003, 153: 243–284. 10.1016/S0377-0427(02)00591-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Örkcü M: Approximation properties of bivariate extension of q -Szász-Mirakjan-Kantorovich operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 324

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tariboon J, Ntouyas SK: Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014., 2014: Article ID 121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrews GE Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Applications 2. In The Theory of Partitions. Addison-Wesley, Reading; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gasper G, Rahman M: Basic Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson FH: On q -definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 50: 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang M:An inequality for ϕ r r + 1 and its applications. J. Math. Inequal. 2007, 1: 339–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito M: Convergence and asymptotic behavior of Jackson integrals associated with irreducible reduced root systems. J. Approx. Theory 2003, 124: 154–180. 10.1016/j.jat.2003.08.006

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (grant 11271057) of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingjin Wang.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M. An inequality for q-integral and its applications. J Inequal Appl 2014, 268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-268

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2014-268

Keywords