 Research
 Open access
 Published:
The first Seiffert mean is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2014, Article number: 185 (2014)
Abstract
The concept of strictly superstabilizability for bivariate means has been defined recently by Raïsoulli and Sándor (J. Inequal. Appl. 2014:28, 2014). We answer into affirmative to an open question posed in that paper, namely: Prove or disprove that the first Seiffert mean P is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable. We use series expansions of the functions involved and reduce the main inequality to three auxiliary ones. The computations are performed with the aid of the computer algebra systems Maple and Maxima. The method is general and can be adapted to other problems related to sub or superstabilizability.
MSC:26E60.
Introduction
A bivariate mean is a map m:{(0,\mathrm{\infty})}^{2}\to \mathbb{R} satisfying the following statement:
Obviously m(a,a)=a for each a>0. The maps (a,b)\mapsto min(a,b) and (a,b)\mapsto max (a,b) are means, and they are called the trivial means.
A mean m is symmetric if m(a,b)=m(b,a) for all a,b>0, and monotone if (a,b)\mapsto m(a,b) is increasing in a and in b, that is, if {a}_{1}\le {a}_{2} (respectively {b}_{1}\le {b}_{2}) then m({a}_{1},b)\le m({a}_{2},b) (respectively m(a,{b}_{1})\le m(a,{b}_{2})). For more details as regards monotone means, see [1].
For two means {m}_{1} and {m}_{2} we write {m}_{1}\le {m}_{2} if and only if {m}_{1}(a,b)\le {m}_{2}(a,b) for every a,b>0, and {m}_{1}<{m}_{2} if and only if {m}_{1}(a,b)<{m}_{2}(a,b) for all a,b>0 with a\ne b. Two means {m}_{1} and {m}_{2} are comparable if {m}_{1}\le {m}_{2} or {m}_{2}\le {m}_{1}, and we say that m is between two comparable means {m}_{1} and {m}_{2} if min({m}_{1},{m}_{2})\le m\le max({m}_{1},{m}_{2}). If the above inequalities are strict then we say that m is strictly between {m}_{1} and {m}_{2}.
Some standard examples of means are given in the following (see [2] and the references therein):
and are called the arithmetic, geometric, harmonic, logarithmic, identric means, respectively, the first Seiffert mean.
The above means are strictly comparable, namely
The next section presents some definitions and preliminary results, and the last section contains the main result. Its proof is based on some heavy computations, and a computer algebra system may be very helpful.
We have used Maple and Maxima, which already offered good results in proving inequalities for means (see, for example, [3]). Note that all the symbolic computations are exact, because only polynomials with rational coefficients are involved. We would like to point out that the method used in this paper is easily adaptable to other ‘stiff’ inequalities involving real analytic functions, if they contain subexpressions with algebraic derivatives.
In particular, during the proof, we needed the Sturm sequence associated to a univariate polynomial, say p, in order to find the number of roots in intervals (c,d]. This can be obtained in Maple by
or in Maxima by
both making use of exact (rational) arithmetic.
Definitions and preliminary results
At first we define the resultant meanmap of three means as in [4], where the properties of the resultant meanmap are studied.
Definition 1 Let {m}_{1}, {m}_{2}, and {m}_{3} be three given symmetric means. For all a,b>0, define the resultant meanmap of {m}_{1}, {m}_{2}, and {m}_{3} as
Example 2 For {m}_{1}=G, {m}_{3}=A and {m}_{2}=P we get
Definition 3 A symmetric mean m is said to be

(a)
stable if \mathcal{R}(m,m,m)=m;

(b)
stabilizable if there exist two nontrivial stable means {m}_{1} and {m}_{2} satisfying the relation \mathcal{R}({m}_{1},m,{m}_{2})=m. We then say that m is ({m}_{1},{m}_{2})stabilizable.
A study about the stability and stabilizability of the standard means was presented in [4]. For example, the arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic means A, G, and H are stable. The logarithmic mean L is (H,A)stabilizable and (A,G)stabilizable, and the identric mean I is (G,A)stabilizable.
The next definitions were formulated in [5].
Definition 4 Let {m}_{1}, {m}_{2} be two nontrivial stable comparable means. A mean m is called:

(a)
({m}_{1},{m}_{2})substabilizable if \mathcal{R}({m}_{1},m,{m}_{2})\le m and m is between {m}_{1} and {m}_{2};

(b)
({m}_{1},{m}_{2})superstabilizable if m\le \mathcal{R}({m}_{1},m,{m}_{2}) and m is between {m}_{1} and {m}_{2}.
This definition extends that of stabilizability, in the sense that a mean m is ({m}_{1},{m}_{2})stabilizable if and only if (a) and (b) hold.
Definition 5 Let {m}_{1}, {m}_{2} be two nontrivial stable comparable means. A mean m is called:

(a)
strictly ({m}_{1},{m}_{2})substabilizable if \mathcal{R}({m}_{1},m,{m}_{2})<m and m is strictly between {m}_{1} and {m}_{2};

(b)
strictly ({m}_{1},{m}_{2})superstabilizable if m<\mathcal{R}({m}_{1},m,{m}_{2}) and m is strictly between {m}_{1} and {m}_{2}.
Example 6 [5]
The geometric mean G is (G,A)superstabilizable (but not strictly), and A is (G,A)substabilizable.
The logarithmic mean L is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable and strictly (A,H)substabilizable. The identric mean I is strictly (A,G)substabilizable.
It is not known if the first Seiffert mean P is stabilizable or not. Several inequalities related to Seiffert means can be found in [6–10] and the references therein.
In [5] it was proved that the first Seiffert mean P is strictly (A,G)substabilizable. An open problem was proposed there, namely: prove or disprove that the first Seiffert mean P is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable.
In what follows we shall prove that indeed the first Seiffert mean P is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable.
Main result
It is well known that G<P<A and both G and A are stable. We have to prove that P<\mathcal{R}(G,P,A), which, using (1), is equivalent with
or
for all a,b>0 with a\ne b. Without restricting the generality, we may consider that b>a and after the substitution t=(ba)/(b+a) we reduce the problem to
for all 0<t<1.
Theorem 7 The first Seiffert mean P is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable.
Proof We have to prove that (3) holds for 0<t<1. To this aim we denote, for 0\le t\le 1,
and we shall prove that
for all 0<t<1. For r=0.995, the inequality (5) is true on [r,1) because the functions α, β, γ are all increasing and for t\ge r
In order to prove that (5) is true also on (0,r) we shall use series expansions up to 20th degree. We obtain
where
We shall use a slightly modified polynomial {\tilde{p}}_{\gamma} given by
Note that a term was added to {p}_{\gamma}, because it can be seen that \gamma (t)>{p}_{\gamma}(t) for t>0 sufficiently small. The coefficient 1/6 was found using some estimations which are omitted because they are not essential for the proof.
We shall prove that:

(i)
\beta (t)<{p}_{\beta}(t), 0<t<1;

(ii)
\gamma (t)<{\tilde{p}}_{\gamma}(t), 0<t<r;

(iii)
4{p}_{\beta}(t){\tilde{p}}_{\gamma}(t)<\alpha (t), 0<t<1.
We denote by {f}_{1}(t)={p}_{\beta}(t)\beta (t), {f}_{2}(t)={f}_{1}^{\prime}(t)={p}_{\beta}^{\prime}(t)\frac{1}{(2+t)\sqrt{1+t}}. We substitute t={(1+s)}^{2}1, 0<s<\sqrt{2}1, and we get {f}_{2}({(1+s)}^{2}1)=\frac{{s}^{19}}{34,359,738,368(2+2s+{s}^{2})(1+s)}{F}_{2}(s), where {F}_{2}(s)={\sum}_{n=0}^{20}{a}_{n}{s}^{n} is a polynomial of 20th degree whose coefficients are given in Table 1, {a}_{0}, {a}_{1}, {a}_{2} etc. in rows.
It follows that {f}_{2}(t)>0, because {F}_{2}(s) has positive coefficients. Since {f}_{1}(0)=0, we have {f}_{1}(t)>0 on (0,1) and (i) is proved.
We proceed similarly for {g}_{1}(t)={\tilde{p}}_{\gamma}(t)\gamma (t), {g}_{2}(t)={g}_{1}^{\prime}(t)={\tilde{p}}_{\gamma}^{\prime}(t)\frac{1}{(t2)\sqrt{1t}}.
We substitute t=1{s}^{2}, 0<s<1, and get {g}_{2}(1{s}^{2})=\frac{1}{103,079,215,104(1+{s}^{2})s}{G}_{2}(s), where {G}_{2}(s)=103,079,215,104+{\sum}_{n=0}^{19}{b}_{n}{s}^{2n+1} is a polynomial of 39th degree, the coefficients {b}_{n} being given in Table 2, three in a row.
By using the Sturm sequence for the polynomial {G}_{2}(s) as stated at the end of the Introduction, both functions (in Maple and in Maxima) return two roots in (0,1]. Since {G}_{2}(1)=1, we find that {G}_{2}(s) has a unique root in (0,1). It follows that {g}_{2}(t) has also a unique root {t}_{1}\in (0,1), hence {g}_{2}(t)>0 on (0,{t}_{1}), and {g}_{2}(t)<0 on ({t}_{1},1). Therefore {g}_{1}(t)>min({g}_{1}(0),{g}_{1}(r)) on (0,r). But {g}_{1}(0)=0 and
hence {g}_{1}(t)>min({g}_{1}(0),{g}_{1}(r))=0 and (ii) is proved.
We consider now the function {h}_{1}(t)=\alpha (t)4{p}_{\beta}(t){\tilde{p}}_{\gamma}(t) and its series expansion {h}_{1}(t)={t}^{6}{h}_{2}(t)+O({t}^{40}), where
Using the Sturm sequence as before we find that the polynomial {h}_{2} has no roots in (0,1) and {t}^{6}{h}_{2}(t)>0.
Now we write {h}_{1}(t)={t}^{6}{h}_{2}(t)+{\sum}_{n=40}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{q}_{n}{t}^{n}. We notice that all the coefficients {q}_{n}, n\ge 40 are in fact the coefficients of the series expansion of \alpha (t)={(arcsint)}^{2}, due to the fact that {p}_{\beta}{\tilde{p}}_{\gamma} is polynomial of degree less that 40. It is known that these are all positive (those of odd order being null), namely
(see [11], p.61).
It follows that {h}_{1}(t)>0, hence (iii) holds.
From (i)(iii) it follows that (5) holds also on (0,r) and the proof is complete. □
Remark 8 We have chosen the form of the polynomials {p}_{\beta}, {p}_{\gamma} and {\tilde{p}}_{\gamma} dealing with three parameters: the degree of the polynomials m (m=19), r\in (0,1) (r=0.995) and the coefficient c of the supplementary term in {\tilde{p}}_{\gamma} (c=1/6). The value for r has been determined so that (6) is true, and the degree of the polynomials not too high (which would happened if we let r=1). The parameter r being fixed, c was related only to m, in such a way that (ii) to be true. Finally, the choice of the three parameters must make (iii) to be fulfilled.
The tests we performed showed that the degree of the polynomials cannot be less than 19, maybe this can be achieved by modifying slightly r, but it seems that the degree cannot be much smaller.
References
Raïssouli M, Sándor J: On a method of construction of new means with applications. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 89
Bullen P: Handbook of Means and Their Inequalities. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 2003.
Anisiu MC, Anisiu V: Logarithmic mean and weighted sum of geometric and antiharmonic means. Rev. Anal. Numér. Théor. Approx. 2012,41(2):95–98.
Raïssouli M: Stability and stabilizability for means. Appl. Math. ENotes 2011, 11: 159–174.
Raïssouli M, Sándor J: Substabilizability and superstabilizability for bivariate means. J. Inequal. Appl. 2014., 2014: Article ID 28
Chu YM, Wang MK, Wang ZK: An optimal double inequality between Seiffert and geometric means. J. Appl. Math. 2011., 2011: Article ID 261237
Chu YM, Wang MK, Wang ZK: A bestpossible inequality between Seiffert and harmonic means. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 94
Gong WM, Song YQ, Wang MK, Chu YM: A sharp double inequality between Seiffert, arithmetic, and geometric means. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 684384
Song YQ, Qian WM, Jiang YL, Chu YM: Optimal lower generalized logarithmic mean bound for the Seiffert mean. J. Appl. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 273653
He ZY, Qian WM, Jiang YL, Song YQ, Chu YM: Bounds for the combinations of NeumanSándor, arithmetic, and second Seiffert means in terms of contraharmonic mean. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013., 2013: Article ID 903982
Gradshteyn I, Ryzhik I: Table of Integrals, Series and Products. Academic Press, Amsterdam; 2007.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the referees for the helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
Both authors jointly worked, read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Anisiu, M.C., Anisiu, V. The first Seiffert mean is strictly (G,A)superstabilizable. J Inequal Appl 2014, 185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2014185
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2014185