# Fuzzy soft set theory applied to medical diagnosis using fuzzy arithmetic operations

- Yıldıray Çelik
^{1}Email author and - Sultan Yamak
^{1}

**2013**:82

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-82

© Çelik and Yamak; licensee Springer 2013

**Received: **26 November 2012

**Accepted: **14 February 2013

**Published: **1 March 2013

## Abstract

In this paper, we apply fuzzy soft set theory through well-known Sanchez’s approach for medical diagnosis using fuzzy arithmetic operations and exhibit the technique with a hypothetical case study.

**AMS Subject Classification:**03E72, 92C50.

## Keywords

## 1 Introduction and preliminaries

Many complicated problems in economics, engineering, social sciences, medical sciences and many other fields involve uncertain data. These problems, which one comes face to face with in life, cannot be solved using classical mathematic methods. In classical mathematics, a mathematical model of an object is devised and the notion of the exact solution of this model is determined. Because of that, the mathematical model is too complex, the exact solution cannot be found. There are several well-known theories to describe uncertainty. For instance, fuzzy set theory [1], rough set theory [2] and other mathematical tools. But all of these theories have their inherit difficulties as pointed out by Molodtsov [3]. To overcome these difficulties, Molodtsov introduced the concept of a soft set as a new mathematical tool for dealing with uncertainties that is free from the difficulties affecting the existing methods. The theory of soft sets has rich potential for applications in several directions, a few of which were demonstrated by Molodtsov in his pioneer work [3]. At present, works on soft set theory are making progress rapidly. Maji *et al.* [4] initiated the concept of fuzzy soft sets with some properties regarding fuzzy soft union, intersection, complement of a fuzzy soft set, De Morgan’s law *etc.* Neog and Sut [5] have reintroduced the notion of fuzzy soft sets and redefined the complement of a fuzzy soft set accordingly. They have shown that the modified definition of the complement of a fuzzy soft set meets all the requirements that the complement of a set in the classical sense really does. Applications of fuzzy soft set theory in many disciplines and real life situations have been studied by many researchers. De *et al.* [6] have studied Sanchez’s [7, 8] method of medical diagnosis using an intuitionistic fuzzy set. Saikia *et al.* [9] have extended the method in [6] using intuitionistic fuzzy soft set theory. In [10], Chetia and Das have studied Sanchez’s approach of medical diagnosis through IVFSS (interval-valued fuzzy soft set) obtaining an improvement of the same set presented in De *et al.* [6]. Using the representation of interval-valued fuzzy matrix, Meenakshi and Kaliraja [11] have provided the techniques to study Sanchez’s approach of medical diagnosis of interval-valued fuzzy matrices. In this paper, by using the notion of a fuzzy soft set together with arithmetic operations on fuzzy number, we apply the fuzzy soft set technology through well-known Sanchez’s [8] approach for medical diagnosis, and we exhibit the technique with a hypothetical case study.

In this section, we will give some known and useful definitions and notations regarding a soft set and a fuzzy soft set. The definitions and notions in this part may be found in references [1, 3, 4, 12–14].

Let *U* be an initial universal set and *E* be a set of parameters. The power set of *U* is denoted by $\mathcal{P}(U)$ and *A* is a subset of *E*. A pair $(F,A)$ is called a *soft set* over *U*, where *F* is a mapping given by $F:A\to \mathcal{P}(U)$.

**Definition 2** [1]

*fuzzy subset*

*μ*of

*U*is defined as a map from

*U*to $[0,1]$. The family of all fuzzy subsets of

*U*is denoted by $\mathcal{F}(U)$. Let $\mu ,\nu \in \mathcal{F}(U)$ and $x\in U$. Then the union and intersection of

*μ*and

*ν*are defined in the following way:

$\mu \le \nu $ if and only if $\mu (x)\le \nu (x)$ for all $x\in U$.

**Definition 3** [4]

Let *U* be a common universe, *E* be a set of parameters and $A\subseteq E$. Then a pair $(F,A)$ is called a *fuzzy soft set* over *U*, where *F* is a mapping given by $F:A\to \mathcal{F}(U)$.

**Definition 4** [4]

*U*, we say that $(F,A)$ is a

*fuzzy soft subset*of $(G,B)$ if

- (i)
$A\subseteq B$,

- (ii)
$F(a)\le G(a)$ for all $a\in A$.

In this case, we write $(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\subseteq}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$.

**Definition 5** [14]

The *relative complement* of a fuzzy soft set $(F,A)$ is denoted by ${(F,A)}^{c}$ and is defined by ${(F,A)}^{c}=({F}^{c},A)$, where ${F}^{c}:A\to \mathcal{F}(U)$ is a mapping given by ${F}^{c}(a)=1-F(a)$ for all $a\in A$.

It should be noted that $1-F(a)$ denotes the fuzzy complement of $F(a)$.

**Definition 6** [4]

- (i)
A fuzzy soft set $(F,A)$ is said to be the

*absolute fuzzy soft set*over*U*, denoted by Ω, if $F(a)={1}_{U}$ for all $a\in A$. - (ii)
A fuzzy soft set $(F,A)$ is said to be the

*null fuzzy soft set*over*U*, denoted by Φ, if $F(a)={0}_{U}$ for all $a\in A$.

*U*. Then

- (i)The
*union*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cup}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\cup B$ and$H(c)=\{\begin{array}{cc}F(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in A\mathrm{\setminus}B,\hfill \\ G(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in B\mathrm{\setminus}A,\hfill \\ F(c)\vee G(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in A\cap B\hfill \end{array}$

- (ii)
The

*restricted intersection*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\sqcap}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\cap B\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and $H(c)=F(c)\wedge G(c)$ for all $c\in C$. - (iii)
The

*restricted union*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\bigsqcup}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\cap B\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}$ and $H(c)=F(c)\vee G(c)$ for all $c\in C$. - (iv)The
*extended intersection*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cap}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\cup B$ and$H(c)=\{\begin{array}{cc}F(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in A\mathrm{\setminus}B,\hfill \\ G(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in B\mathrm{\setminus}A,\hfill \\ F(c)\wedge G(c)\hfill & \text{if}c\in A\cap B\hfill \end{array}$

- (v)
The ∧-

*intersection*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\wedge}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\times B$ and $H(a,b)=F(a)\wedge G(b)$ for all $(a,b)\in A\times B$. - (vi)
The ∨-

*union*of fuzzy soft sets $(F,A)$ and $(G,B)$ is defined as the fuzzy soft set $(H,C)=(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\vee}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$ over*U*, where $C=A\times B$ and $H(a,b)=F(a)\vee G(b)$ for all $(a,b)\in A\times B$.

**Example** Let $U=\{{h}_{1},{h}_{2},{h}_{3}\}$ be the set of three houses under consideration and $E=\{{e}_{1}\text{(costly)},{e}_{2}\text{(beautiful)},{e}_{3}\text{(green surroundings)}\}$ be the set of parameters.

- (i)
${(F,A)}^{c}={F}^{c}({e}_{1})=\{({h}_{1},.3),({h}_{2},.5),({h}_{3},.7)\}$, ${F}^{c}({e}_{2})=\{({h}_{1},.3),({h}_{2},.4),({h}_{3},.5)\}$,

- (ii)
$(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\subseteq}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B)$.

*Let*$(F,A)$

*and*$(G,B)$

*be two fuzzy soft sets over a common universe*

*U*.

*Then*

- (1)
$(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cup}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(F,A)=(F,A)$,

- (2)
$(F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cap}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(F,A)=(F,A)$,

- (3)
${((F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cup}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B))}^{c}={(F,A)}^{c}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cap}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{(G,B)}^{c}$,

- (4)
${((F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cap}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B))}^{c}={(F,A)}^{c}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\cup}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{(G,B)}^{c}$,

- (5)
${((F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\vee}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B))}^{c}={(F,A)}^{c}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\wedge}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{(G,B)}^{c}$,

- (6)
${((F,A)\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\wedge}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}(G,B))}^{c}={(F,A)}^{c}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\tilde{\vee}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}{(G,B)}^{c}$.

**Definition 8** [12]

- (1)
A fuzzy subset

*μ*on the universe of discourse ℝ (the set of all real numbers) is*convex*if and only if for $a,b\in U$ $\mu (\alpha a+\beta b)\ge \mu (a)\wedge \mu (b)$, where $\alpha +\beta =1$. - (2)
A fuzzy subset

*μ*on the universe of discourse*U*is called a*normal fuzzy subset*if there exist ${a}_{i}\in U$ such that $\mu ({a}_{i})=1$. - (3)
A

*fuzzy number*is a fuzzy subset defined on the universe of discourse ℝ which is both convex and normal.

*μ*on the universe of discourse ℝ may be characterized by a triangular distribution function parameterized by a triplet $(a,b,c)$. The membership function of the fuzzy number

*μ*is defined as

If the membership function $\mu (u)$ is piecewise linear, then *μ* is said to be a *trapezoidal fuzzy number*.

*μ*and

*β*be two triangular fuzzy numbers parameterized by the triplet ${b}_{1}=({a}_{1},{b}_{1},{c}_{1})$ and ${b}_{2}=({a}_{2},{b}_{2},{c}_{2})$ respectively. Then addition and multiplication of

*μ*and

*β*as given in [12] are

*t*of the fuzzy number is calculated from the figure as follows:

*e*of a triangular fuzzy number $(a,b,c)$ is equal to

## 2 Methodology and algorithm

In this section we present an algorithm for medical diagnosis using fuzzy arithmetic operations. Assume that there is a set of *m* patients, $P=\{{p}_{1},{p}_{2},{p}_{3},\dots ,{p}_{m}\}$ with a set of *n* symptoms $S=\{{s}_{1},{s}_{2},{s}_{3},\dots ,{s}_{n}\}$ related to a set of *k* diseases $D=\{{d}_{1},{d}_{2},{d}_{3},\dots ,{d}_{k}\}$.

We apply fuzzy soft set theory to develop a technique through Sanchez’s method to diagnose which patient is suffering from what disease. For this, construct a fuzzy soft set $(F,P)$ over *S* where *F* is a mapping $F:P\to \mathcal{F}(S)$. This fuzzy soft set gives a relation matrix *Q*, called patient-symptom matrix, where the entries are fuzzy numbers $\tilde{p}$ parameterized by a triplet $(p-1,p,p+1)$.

Then construct another fuzzy soft set $(G,S)$ over *D*, where *G* is a mapping $G:S\to \mathcal{F}(D)$. This fuzzy soft set gives a relation matrix (weighted matrix) *R*, called symptom-disease matrix, where each element denotes the weight of the symptoms for a certain disease. These elements are also taken as triangular fuzzy numbers.

*Q*is

*R*is

Now if $max{v}_{il}={v}_{is}$ for $1\le l\le k$, then we conclude that the patient ${p}_{i}$ is suffering from disease ${d}_{s}$. In case $max{v}_{il}$ occurs for more than one value of *l*, $1\le l\le m$, then we can reassess the symptoms to break the tie.

**Algorithm**

Step I: Input the soft set $(F,P)$ to obtain the patient-symptom matrix *Q*.

Step II: Input the soft set $(G,S)$ to obtain the symptom-disease matrix *R*.

Step III: Perform the transformation operation $Q\otimes R$ to get the patient diagnosis matrix ${D}^{\ast}$.

Step IV: Defuzzify all the elements of the matrix ${D}^{\ast}$ by (1) to obtain the matrix ${D}^{\ast \ast}$.

Step V: Find *s* for which ${\nu}_{is}=max{v}_{il}$.

Then we conclude that the patient ${p}_{i}$ is suffering from disease ${d}_{s}$.

## 3 Case study

Suppose there are three patients John, George and Albert in a hospital with symptoms temperature, headache, cough and stomach problem. Let the possible diseases relating to the above symptoms be viral fever, typhoid and malaria. Now take $P=\{{p}_{1},{p}_{2},{p}_{3}\}$ as the universal set where ${p}_{1}$, ${p}_{2}$ and ${p}_{3}$ represent patients John, George and Albert, respectively. Next consider the set $S=\{{s}_{1},{s}_{2},{s}_{3},{s}_{4}\}$ as a universal set where ${s}_{1}$, ${s}_{2}$, ${s}_{3}$, ${s}_{4}$ represent symptoms temperature, headache, cough and stomach problem, respectively and the set $D=\{{d}_{1},{d}_{2},{d}_{3}\}$, where ${d}_{1}$, ${d}_{2}$ and ${d}_{3}$ represent the diseases viral fever, typhoid and malaria, respectively.

*S*and gives a collection of an approximate description of the patient-symptoms in the hospital. This fuzzy soft set $(F,P)$ represents the relation matrix (patient-symptom matrix)

*Q*and is given by

*S*where $G:S\to \mathcal{F}(D)$ and is determined from expert medical documentation. Thus the fuzzy soft set $(G,S)$ gives an approximate description of the three diseases and their symptoms. This soft set is represented by a relation matrix (symptom-disease matrix)

*R*and is given by

The above values are obtained from (∗).

It is clear from the above matrix that patient ${p}_{1}$ is suffering from disease ${d}_{1}$ and patients ${p}_{2}$ and ${p}_{3}$ both are suffering from disease ${d}_{2}$.

## 4 Conclusion

We have applied the notion of fuzzy soft sets in Sanchez’s method of medical diagnosis. A case study has been taken to exhibit the simplicity of the technique. Future work in this regard would be required to study whether the notions put forward in this paper yield a fruitful result.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Zadeh LA: Fuzzy sets.
*Inf. Control*1965, 8: 338–353. 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-XMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Pawlak Z: Rough sets.
*Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci.*1982, 11: 341–356. 10.1007/BF01001956MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Molodtsov D: Soft set theory - first result.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*1999, 37: 19–31.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Maji PK, Biswas R, Roy AR: Fuzzy soft set.
*J. Fuzzy Math.*2001, 9(3):677–692.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Neog TJ, Sut DK: Theory of fuzzy soft sets from a new perspective.
*Int. J. Latest Trends Comput.*2011, 2(3):439–450.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - De SK, Biswas R, Roy AR: An application of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in medical diagnosis.
*Fuzzy Sets Syst.*2001, 117: 209–213. 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00235-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sanchez E: Resolution of composite fuzzy relation equations.
*Inf. Control*1976, 30: 38–48. 10.1016/S0019-9958(76)90446-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Sanchez E: Inverse of fuzzy relations, application to possibility distributions and medical diagnosis.
*Fuzzy Sets Syst.*1979, 2(1):75–86. 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90017-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Saikia BK, Das PK, Borkakati AK: An application of intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets in medical diagnosis.
*Bio-Sci. Res. Bull.*2003, 19(2):121–127.Google Scholar - Chetia B, Das PK: An application of interval valued fuzzy soft set in medical diagnosis.
*Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci.*2010, 5(38):1887–1894.Google Scholar - Meenakshi AR, Kaliraja M: An application of interval valued fuzzy matrices in medical diagnosis.
*Int. J. Math. Anal.*2011, 5(36):1791–1802.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Kaufmann A, Gupta MM:
*Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications*. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York; 1991.Google Scholar - Ali MI, Feng F, Liu X, Min WK, Shabir M: On some new operations in soft set theory.
*Comput. Math. Appl.*2009, 57: 1547–1553. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.11.009MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ali MI, Shabir M: Comments on De Morgan’s law in fuzzy soft sets.
*J. Fuzzy Math.*2010, 18(3):679–686.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.