 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
Some results on parallel iterative algorithms for strictly pseudocontractive mappings
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 74 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, a parallel iterative algorithm with mixed errors is investigated. Strong and weak convergence theorems of common fixed points of a finite family of strictly pseudocontractive mappings are established in a real Banach space.
AMS Subject Classification:47H05, 47H09, 47J25.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
Throughout this paper, we denote by E and {E}^{\ast} a real Banach space and a dual space of E, respectively. Let \u3008\cdot ,\cdot \u3009 denote the pairing between E and {E}^{\ast}. The normalized duality mapping J:E\to {2}^{{E}^{\ast}} is defined by
In the sequel, we use j to denote the singlevalued normalized duality mapping. Let K be a nonempty subset of E and T:K\to K be a mapping. Recall the following.
T is said to be Lipschitz if there exists a positive constant L such that
T is said to be nonexpansive if
T is said to be strictly pseudocontractive in the terminology of Browder and Petryshyn [1] if there exists \lambda >0 such that
for some j(xy)\in J(xy). It is clear that the class of strictly pseudocontractive mappings includes the class of nonexpansive mappings as a special case. It is also clear that (1.1) is equivalent to the following:
We know that strictly pseudocontractive mappings are Lipschitz continuous. Indeed, we find from (1.2) that
T is said to be strongly pseudocontractive if there exists k\in (0,1) such that
for some j(xy)\in J(xy). T is said to be pseudocontractive if there exists some j(xy)\in J(xy) such that
T is said to be Lipschitz if there exists a positive constant L such that
It is well known that [2] (1.4) is equivalent to the following:
We remark that the class of strongly pseudocontractive mappings is independent of the class of strictly pseudocontractive mappings. This can be seen from the following examples.
Example 1.1 [3]
Take K=(0,\mathrm{\infty}) and define T:K\to K by
Then T is a strictly pseudocontractive mapping but not a strongly pseudocontractive mapping.
Example 1.2 [3]
Take K=R and define T:K\to K by
Example 1.3 [4]
Take E={R}^{2}, B=\{x\in {R}^{2}:\parallel x\parallel \le 1\}, {B}_{1}=\{x\in B:\parallel x\parallel \le \frac{1}{2}\}, {B}_{2}=\{x\in B:\frac{1}{2}\le \parallel x\parallel \le 1\}. If x=(a,b)\in E, we define {x}^{\mathrm{\perp}} to be (b,a)\in E. Define T:B\to B by
Then T is a Lipschitz pseudocontractive mapping but not a strictly pseudocontractive mapping.
Let U=\{x\in E:\parallel x\parallel =1\}. E is said to be smooth or is said to have a Gâteaux differentiable norm if the limit
exists for each x,y\in U. E is said to have a uniformly Gâteaux differentiable norm if for each y\in U, the limit is attained uniformly for all x\in U. E is said to be uniformly smooth or is said to have a uniformly Fréchet differentiable norm if the limit is attained uniformly for x,y\in U. It is known that if the norm of E is uniformly Gâteaux differentiable, then the duality mapping J is single valued and uniformly norm to weak^{∗} continuous on each bounded subset of E.
In 2001, Xu and Ori [5], in the framework of Hilbert spaces, introduced the following implicit iteration process for a finite family of nonexpansive mappings \{{T}_{1},{T}_{2},\dots ,{T}_{N}\} with \{{\alpha}_{n}\} a real sequence in (0,1) and an initial point {x}_{0}\in C:
which can written in the following compact form:
where {T}_{n}={T}_{n(modN)} (here the modN takes values in \{1,2,\dots ,N\}).
They obtained the following weak convergence theorem.
Theorem XO Let H be a real Hilbert space, K be a nonempty closed convex subset of H, and {T}_{i}:K\to K be a nonexpansive mapping such that F={\bigcap}_{i=1}^{N}F({T}_{i})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}. Let \{{x}_{n}\} be defined by (1.6). If \{{\alpha}_{n}\} is chosen so that {\alpha}_{n}\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, then \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to a common fixed point of the family of {\{{T}_{i}\}}_{i=1}^{N}.
They further remarked that it is yet unclear what assumptions on the mappings and/or the parameters \{{\alpha}_{n}\} are sufficient to guarantee the strong convergence of the sequence \{{x}_{n}\}.
In 2004, Osilike [6] further extended the above results from Hilbert spaces to Banach spaces. To be more precise, he obtain the following results.
Theorem O Let H be a real Hilbert space, K be a nonempty closed convex subset of H, and {T}_{i}:K\to K be a strictly pseudocontractive mapping such that F={\bigcap}_{i=1}^{N}F({T}_{i})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}. Let \{{x}_{n}\} be defined by (1.6). If \{{\alpha}_{n}\} is chosen so that {\alpha}_{n}\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}, then \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to a common fixed point of the family of {\{{T}_{i}\}}_{i=1}^{N}.
Subsequently, many authors have investigated the fixed point problem of strictly pseudocontractive mappings based on an implicit or nonimplicit iterative algorithm in Banach spaces; see [7–32] and the references therein.
In 2007, Acedo and Xu proposed a parallel iterative algorithm for strictly pseudocontractive mappings in the framework of Hilbert spaces. Weak and strong convergence theorems for common fixed points of a family of strictly pseudocontractive mappings were established; see [26] for more details and the reference therein.
In this paper, motivated by the above results, we consider an implicitly parallel iterative algorithm for a finite family of strictly pseudocontractive mappings. Weak and strong convergence theorems are established in the framework of Banach spaces.
In order to prove our main results, we need the following conceptions and lemmas.
Recall that the space E is said to satisfy Opial’s condition [33] if, for each sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in E, the convergence {x}_{n}\to x weakly implies that
Recall that the mapping T:K\to K is semicompact if any sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in K satisfying {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}T{x}_{n}\parallel =0 has a convergent subsequence.
Lemma 1.1 [34]
Let E be a real Banach space, K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E, and T:K\to K be a continuous strongly pseudocontractive mapping. Then T has a unique fixed point in K.
Lemma 1.2 [11]
Let E be a smooth Banach space and K be a nonempty convex subset of E. Let r\ge 1 be some integer. Let {T}_{i}:K\to K be a strictly pseudocontractive mapping. Assume that {\bigcap}_{i=1}^{r}F({T}_{i}) is not empty. Assume that {\{{\mu}_{i}\}}_{i=1}^{r} is a positive sequence such that {\sum}_{i=1}^{r}{\mu}_{i}=1. Then {\bigcap}_{i=1}^{r}F({T}_{i})=F({\sum}_{i=1}^{r}{\mu}_{i}{T}_{i}).
Lemma 1.3 [35]
Let \{{a}_{n}\}, \{{b}_{n}\}, and \{{c}_{n}\} be three nonnegative sequences satisfying the following condition:
where {n}_{0} is some nonnegative integer, {\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{b}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty}, and {\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{c}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty}. Then the limit {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}{a}_{n} exists.
2 Main results
Theorem 2.1 Let E be a smooth and reflexive Banach space which also satisfies Opial’s condition and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping and \{{u}_{n}\} be a bounded sequence in K. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\}, \{{\beta}_{n}\}, \{{\gamma}_{n}\}, and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing}, and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}={\alpha}_{n}+{\beta}_{n}+{\gamma}_{n}=1;

(b)
{\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\gamma}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty};

(c)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
Then \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to some point in F.
Proof Put T:={\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m}. We show that T is λstrictly pseudocontractive mapping, where \lambda :=min\{{\lambda}_{m}:1\le m\le N\}. Notice that
This proves that T is λstrictly pseudocontractive mapping. Next, we show that the implicit iterative algorithm (2.1) is well defined for the strictly pseudocontractive mappings. Define a mapping
It follows that
This shows that {P}_{n} is strongly pseudocontractive. Since strictly pseudocontractive mappings are Lipschitz continuous, we see that {P}_{n} is also continuous. In view of Lemma 1.1, we see that {P}_{n} has a unique fixed point. This proves that the implicit iterative algorithm (2.1) is well defined. In view of Lemma 1.2, we see that F=F({\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}F({T}_{m}))=F(T). Fixing p\in F, we see that
It follows that
This implies, from the restriction (c), that
where M is an appropriate constant such that M\ge {sup}_{n\ge 1}\{\frac{\parallel {u}_{n}p\parallel}{a}\}. In view of Lemma 1.3, we obtain that {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}p\parallel exits. Thanks to (2.2), we find from the restrictions (b) and (c) that
Since the space is reflexive and \{{x}_{n}\} is bounded, there exists a subsequence \{{x}_{{n}_{i}}\} of the sequence \{{x}_{n}\}, which weakly converges to some x∈. In view of Lemma 1.4, we find that x\in F(T)=F.
Finally, we show the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} weakly converges to x. Suppose the contrary, then there exists some subsequence \{{x}_{{n}_{j}}\} of the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} which weakly converges to {x}^{\prime}\ne x\in C. It also follows from Lemma 1.4 that {x}^{\prime}\in F. Since {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}p\parallel exits for any p\in F. Put
Since the space satisfies Opial’s condition, we see that
This is a contradiction. This shows that x={x}^{\prime}. This proves that the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to x\in F. This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.2 Let E be a smooth and reflexive Banach space which also satisfies Opial’s condition and let K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\} and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}=1;

(b)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
Then \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to some point in F.
In Hilbert spaces, we find from Theorem 2.1 the following.
Corollary 2.3 Let E be a Hilbert space and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping and \{{u}_{n}\} be a bounded sequence in K. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\}, \{{\beta}_{n}\}, \{{\gamma}_{n}\}, and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}={\alpha}_{n}+{\beta}_{n}+{\gamma}_{n}=1;

(b)
{\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\gamma}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty};

(c)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
Then \{{x}_{n}\} converges weakly to some point in F.
Next, we give a strong convergence theorem.
Theorem 2.4 Let E be a smooth and reflexive Banach space and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping and \{{u}_{n}\} be a bounded sequence in K. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\}, \{{\beta}_{n}\}, \{{\gamma}_{n}\}, and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}={\alpha}_{n}+{\beta}_{n}+{\gamma}_{n}=1;

(b)
{\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\gamma}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty};

(c)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
If {\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m} is semicompact, then \{{x}_{n}\} converges strongly to some point in F.
Proof Since {\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m} is semicompact, we see that there exists a subsequence \{{x}_{{n}_{i}}\} of \{{x}_{n}\} such that {x}_{{n}_{i}}\to {x}^{\ast}. Notice that
Since {\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m} is Lipschitz continuous, we see from (2.3) that {x}^{\ast}\in F({\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m})=F. From Theorem 2.1, we know that {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}p\parallel exits for any p\in F. That is, {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}\parallel {x}_{n}{x}^{\ast}\parallel exits. In view of {x}_{{n}_{i}}\to {x}^{\ast}, we find that
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2.5 Let E be a smooth and reflexive Banach space and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\} and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}=1;

(b)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
If {\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m} is semicompact, then \{{x}_{n}\} converges strongly to some point in F.
In Hilbert spaces, we find from Theorem 2.1 the following.
Corollary 2.6 Let E be a Hilbert space and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E. Let N\ge 1 be some positive integer. Let {T}_{m}:K\to K, where m\in \{1,\dots ,N\}, be a {\lambda}_{i}strictly pseudocontractive mapping and \{{u}_{n}\} be a bounded sequence in K. Let {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=0}^{\mathrm{\infty}} be a sequence generated in the following algorithm:
where \{{\alpha}_{n}\}, \{{\beta}_{n}\}, \{{\gamma}_{n}\}, and \{{\delta}_{m}\} are real number sequences in [0,1]. Assume that F:={\bigcap}_{m=1}^{N}F({T}_{m})\ne \mathrm{\varnothing} and the above control sequences satisfy the following restrictions:

(a)
{\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}={\alpha}_{n}+{\beta}_{n}+{\gamma}_{n}=1;

(b)
{\sum}_{n=1}^{\mathrm{\infty}}{\gamma}_{n}<\mathrm{\infty};

(c)
0<a\le {\alpha}_{n}\le b<1, where a and b are constants.
If {\sum}_{m=1}^{N}{\delta}_{m}{T}_{m} is semicompact, then \{{x}_{n}\} converges strongly to some point in F.
References
Browder FE, Petryshyn WV: Construction of fixed points of nonlinear mappings in Hilbert spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1967, 20: 197–228. 10.1016/0022247X(67)900856
Browder FE Proc. Sympos. Math. 18. In Nonlinear Operators and Nonlinear Equations of Evolution in Banach Spaces. Am. Math. Soc., Providence; 1976.
Zhou H: Convergence theorems of common fixed points for a finite family of Lipschitz pseudocontractions in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68: 2977–2983. 10.1016/j.na.2007.02.041
Chidume CE, Mutangadura SA: An example on the Mann iteration method for Lipschitz pseudocontractions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2001, 129: 2359–2363. 10.1090/S0002993901060099
Xu HK, Ori RG: An implicit iteration process for nonexpansive mappings. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2001, 22: 767–773. 10.1081/NFA100105317
Osilike MO: Implicit iteration process for common fixed points of a finite family of strictly pseudocontractive maps. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 294: 73–81. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.01.038
Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of fixed points of pseudocontraction semigroups based on a viscosity iterative process. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 224–228. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.09.008
Cho SY, Qin X, Kang SM: Hybrid projection algorithms for treating common fixed points of a family of demicontinuous pseudocontractions. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 854–857. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.10.031
Zhou H: Convergence theorems for λ strict pseudocontractions in 2uniformly smooth Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 3160–3173. 10.1016/j.na.2007.09.009
Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: Strong convergence of shrinking projection methods for quasi ϕ nonexpansive mappings and equilibrium problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 234: 750–760. 10.1016/j.cam.2010.01.015
Zhou H: Convergence theorems of common fixed points for a finite family of Lipschitz pseudocontractions in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68: 2977–2983. 10.1016/j.na.2007.02.041
Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of common solutions of variational inequalities via strict pseudocontractions. Acta Math. Sci. 2012, 32: 1607–1618.
Kim JK, Nam YM, Sim JY: Convergence theorems of implicit iterative sequences for a finite family of asymptotically quasinonexpansive type mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: e2839e2848. 10.1016/j.na.2009.06.090
Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Convergence theorems of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 225: 20–30. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.06.011
Luo H, Wang Y: Iterative approximation for the common solutions of a infinite variational inequality system for inversestrongly accretive mappings. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 2: 1660–1670.
Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: An extragradienttype method for generalized equilibrium problems involving strictly pseudocontractive mappings. J. Glob. Optim. 2012, 49: 679–693.
Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Strong convergence theorem for a common point of solution of variational inequality and fixed point problem. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 374–397.
Lv S, Wu C: Convergence of iterative algorithms for a generalized variational inequality and a nonexpansive mapping. Eng. Math. Lett. 2012, 1: 44–57.
Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: On hybrid projection methods for asymptotically quasi ϕ nonexpansive mappings. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 215: 3874–3883. 10.1016/j.amc.2009.11.031
Qing Y, Kim JK: Weak convergence of algorithms for asymptotically strict pseudocontractions in the intermediate sense and equilibrium problems. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 132
Ye J, Huang J: Strong convergence theorems for fixed point problems and generalized equilibrium problems of three relatively quasinonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2011, 1: 1–18.
Hao H, Wang X, Tong A: Weak and strong convergence theorems for two finite families of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 417–432.
Qin X, Shang M, Su Y: Strong convergence of a general iterative algorithm for equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems. Math. Comput. Model. 2008, 48: 1033–1046. 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.12.008
Kim JK, Cho SY, Qin X: Hybrid projection algorithms for generalized equilibrium problems and strictly pseudocontractive mappings. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 312602
Osilike MO, Shehu Y: Explicit averaging cyclic algorithm for common fixed points of a finite family of asymptotically strictly pseudocontractive maps in Banach spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2009, 57: 1502–1510. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.01.022
Kim JK, Cho SY, Qin X: Some results on generalized equilibrium problems involving strictly pseudocontractive mappings. Acta Math. Sci. 2011, 31: 2041–2057.
Acedo GL, Xu HK: Iterative methods for strict pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2007, 67: 2258–2271. 10.1016/j.na.2006.08.036
Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM, Zhou H: Convergence of a modified Halperntype iteration algorithm for quasi ϕ nonexpansive mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 1051–1055. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.01.015
Kim JK: Strong convergence theorems by hybrid projection methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of the asymptotically quasi ϕ nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 10
Kim JK, Anah PN, Nam YM: Strong convergence of an extended extragradient method for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2012, 49: 187–200. 10.4134/JKMS.2012.49.1.187
Cho SY, Kang SM: Zero point theorems for m accretive operators in a Banach space. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, 13: 49–58.
Kang SM, Cho SY, Liu Z: Generalized equilibrium problems involving inversestrongly monotone mappings. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 827082
Opial Z: Weak convergence of the sequence of successive approximation for nonexpansive mappings. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 1967, 73: 591–597. 10.1090/S000299041967117610
Deimling K: Zeros of accretive operators. Manuscr. Math. 1974, 13: 365–374. 10.1007/BF01171148
Tan KK, Xu HK: Approximating fixed points of nonexpansive mappings by the Ishikawa iterative process. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1993, 178: 301–308. 10.1006/jmaa.1993.1309
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the reviewers’ suggestions which improved the contents of the article.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Qing, Y. & Zhang, M. Some results on parallel iterative algorithms for strictly pseudocontractive mappings. J Inequal Appl 2013, 74 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X201374
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X201374
Keywords
 implicit iterative algorithm
 fixed point
 pseudocontractive mapping
 strictly pseudocontractive mapping