Review  Open  Published:
On Chen invariants and inequalities in quaternionic geometry
Journal of Inequalities and Applicationsvolume 2013, Article number: 66 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper we give a survey of main results concerning Chen inequalities for submanifolds in quaternionic space forms and propose some open problems in the field for further research.
AMS Subject Classification:53C15, 53C25, 53C40.
1 Introduction
The theory of Chen invariants, initiated by Prof. B.Y. Chen in a seminal paper published in 1993 [1], is presently one of the most interesting research topic in differential geometry of submanifolds. The author’s original motivation to introduce new types of Riemannian invariants, known as δinvariants or Chen invariants, was the need to provide answers to an open question raised by Chern concerning the existence of minimal immersions into a Euclidean space of arbitrary dimension [2]. In fact, due the lack of control of the extrinsic properties of the submanifolds by the known intrinsic invariants, no solutions to Chern’s problem were known before the invention of Chen invariants (see [3]). Therefore, in [1], Chen obtained a necessary condition for the existence of minimal isometric immersion from a given Riemannian manifold M into Euclidean space and established a sharp inequality for a submanifold in a real space form using the scalar curvature and the sectional curvature (both being intrinsic invariants) and squared mean curvature (the main extrinsic invariant). On the other hand, in [4], Chen obtained inequalities between the kRicci curvature, the squared mean curvature and the shape operator for submanifolds in real space forms with arbitrary codimensions. These inequalities are also sharp, and many nice classes of submanifolds realize equality in all above inequalities. Since then many papers concerning Chen invariants and inequalities have appeared in the literature for different classes of submanifolds in various ambient spaces, like complex space forms [5–7], cosymplectic space forms [8–10], Sasakian space forms [11–13], locally conformal Kähler space forms [14–16], generalized complex space forms [17–19], locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifolds [20, 21], $(\kappa ,\mu )$contact space forms [22, 23], Kenmotsu space forms [24, 25], Sspace forms [26, 27], Tspace forms [28]; see also [29] and references therein.
In the last decade, Chenlike inequalities were extended in the quaternionic setting. It is the main purpose of this paper to present the evolution of these inequalities for submanifolds in quaternionic space forms, to survey some recent results on this topic and to propose a set of natural problems in the field.
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Riemannian invariants
In this subsection we recall some basic concepts concerning Chen invariants, using mainly [30].
Let M be an ndimensional Riemannian manifold. We denote by $K(\pi )$ the sectional curvature of M associated with a plane section $\pi \subset {T}_{p}M$, $p\in M$. If $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{n}\}$ is an orthonormal basis of the tangent space ${T}_{p}M$, the scalar curvature τ at p is defined by
One denotes
and the Chen first invariant is given by
Suppose L is an rdimensional subspace of ${T}_{p}M$, $r\ge 2$ and $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{r}\}$ an orthonormal basis of L. We define the scalar curvature $\tau (L)$ of the rplane section L by
For an integer $k\ge 0$, we denote by $S(n,k)$ the set of ktuples $({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$ of integers ≥2 satisfying ${n}_{1}<n$, ${n}_{1}+\cdots +{n}_{k}\le n$. We denote by $S(n)$ the set of unordered ktuples with $k\ge 0$ for a fixed n.
For each ktuples $({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})\in S(n)$, Chen introduced a Riemannian invariant $\delta ({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$ defined by
where
${L}_{1},\dots ,{L}_{k}$ running over all k mutually orthogonal subspaces of ${T}_{p}M$ such that $dim{L}_{j}={n}_{j}$, $j\in \{1,\dots ,k\}$. We note that the Chen invariant with $k=0$ is nothing but the scalar curvature. Also, we denote by $d({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$ and $b({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$ the real constants given by
and
For a kplane section L of ${T}_{p}M$, $p\in M$, and X a unit vector in L, one can choose an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{k}\}$ of L such that ${e}_{1}=X$. Then the Ricci curvature of L at X, denoted ${Ric}_{L}(X)$, is defined by
We note that such a curvature is called a kRicci curvature.
For an integer k, $2\le k\le n$, B.Y. Chen introduced a Riemannian invariant ${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}$ defined by
where L runs over all kplane sections in ${T}_{p}M$ and X runs over all unit vectors in L.
It is well known that all these above invariants have many interesting applications to several fields of mathematics (see [30]).
2.2 Quaternionic Kähler manifolds
The geometry of Riemannian structures, complex structures, almost contact structures, hypercomplex structures, quaternionic and CauchyRiemann structures belongs to the general theory of the Gstructures, a domain of great interest in modern differential geometry, in global analysis and mathematical physics. Quaternionic manifolds correspond to the reduction of the structural group at $GL(n,H)\cdot Sp(1)$. From the metric viewpoint, the most interesting is the case of quaternionic Kähler manifolds, which corresponds to the reduction of the holonomy at a subgroup of $Sp(n)\cdot Sp(1)$. They appear in Berger’s list for possible holonomy groups of irreducible Riemannian manifolds [31]. We give in this subsection a quick review of basic definitions and properties concerning the differential geometry of manifolds endowed with quaternionic structures. For details, see [32].
Let $\overline{M}$ be a differentiable manifold and assume that there is a rank 3subbundle σ of $End(T\overline{M})$ such that a local basis $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ exists on sections of σ satisfying for all $\alpha \in \{1,2,3\}$:
where Id denotes the identity tensor field of type $(1,1)$ on M and the indices are taken from $\{1,2,3\}$ modulo 3. Then the bundle σ is called an almost quaternionic structure on M and $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ is called a canonical local basis of σ. Moreover, $(\overline{M},\sigma )$ is said to be an almost quaternionic manifold. It is easy to see that any almost quaternionic manifold is of dimension 4m, $m\ge 1$.
A Riemannian metric $\overline{g}$ on $\overline{M}$ is said to be adapted to the almost quaternionic structure σ if it satisfies:
for all vector fields X, Y on $\overline{M}$ and any canonical local basis $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ of σ. Moreover, $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is said to be an almost quaternionic Hermitian manifold.
If the bundle σ is parallel with respect to the LeviCivita connection $\overline{\mathrm{\nabla}}$ of $\overline{g}$, then $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is said to be a quaternionic Kähler manifold. Equivalently, locally defined 1forms ${\omega}_{1}$, ${\omega}_{2}$, ${\omega}_{3}$ exist such that we have, for all $\alpha \in \{1,2,3\}$,
for any vector field X on $\overline{M}$, where the indices are taken from $\{1,2,3\}$ modulo 3.
We remark that any quaternionic Kähler manifold is an Einstein manifold, provided that $dimM>4$ (see [32–34]).
Let $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ be a quaternionic Kähler manifold and let X be a nonnull vector on $\overline{M}$. Then the 4plane spanned by $\{X,{J}_{1}X,{J}_{2}X,{J}_{3}X\}$, denoted by $Q(X)$, is called a quaternionic 4plane. Any 2plane in $Q(X)$ is called a quaternionic plane. The sectional curvature of a quaternionic plane is called a quaternionic sectional curvature. A quaternionic Kähler manifold is a quaternionic space form if its quaternionic sectional curvatures are equal to a constant, say c. It is wellknown that a quaternionic Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is a quaternionic space form, denoted $\overline{M}(c)$, if and only if its curvature tensor is given by (see [32])
for all vector fields X, Y, Z on $\overline{M}$ and any local basis $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ of σ. We note that some interesting characterizations of quaternionic space forms were obtained in [35].
For a submanifold M of a quaternion Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$, we denote by g the metric tensor induced on M. If ∇ is the covariant differentiation induced on M, the Gauss and Weingarten formulas are given by
and
where h is the second fundamental form of M, ${\mathrm{\nabla}}^{\perp}$ is the connection on the normal bundle and ${A}_{N}$ is the shape operator of M with respect to N. The shape operator ${A}_{N}$ is related to h by
for all $X,Y\in \mathrm{\Gamma}(TM)$ and $N\in \mathrm{\Gamma}(T{M}^{\perp})$.
If $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{n}\}$ is an orthonormal basis of ${T}_{p}M$ and $\{{e}_{n+1},\dots ,{e}_{4m}\}$ is an orthonormal basis of ${T}_{p}^{\perp}M$, where $p\in M$, we denote by H the mean curvature vector, that is,
Also, we set
and
The submanifold M is called totally geodesic if the second fundamental form vanishes identically and totally umbilical if there is a real number λ such that $h(X,Y)=\lambda g(X,Y)H$ for any tangent vectors X, Y on M. If $H=0$, then the submanifold M is said to be minimal.
3 Fundamental inequalities involving Chen invariants and the squared mean curvature
For a Riemannian submanifold ${M}^{n}$ of a real space form $\overline{M}$ with constant sectional curvature c, Chen [1] proved the following inequality for the Riemannian invariant ${\delta}_{M}$ of M, known as the first Chen inequality:
The submanifold M is said to satisfy Chen’s equality if the equality case of (15) holds identically.
In quaternionic Kähler ambient, the first classes of submanifolds which have been introduced and studied were quaternionic [36] and totally real submanifolds [37]. A submanifold M in a quaternionic Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is called a quaternionic submanifold (resp. a totally real submanifold) if each tangent space of M is carried into itself (resp. into the normal space) by each section in σ. An ndimensional totally real submanifold of a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$ is said to be a Lagrangian submanifold if $n=m$. It is well known that a quaternionic submanifold is totally geodesic, so the first class of interest from Chen’s inequalities viewpoint is given by the totally real submanifolds. In [38], the validity of the inequality (15) was proved for totally real submanifolds in a quaternionic space form $\overline{M}(4c)$ of quaternionic sectional curvature 4c, and Chen’s equality was interpreted in terms of eigenvalues and eigenspaces of the Weingarten operators of the submanifold. As a consequence, Hong and Houh obtained the following interesting result.
Theorem 3.1 [38]
Every Lagrangian submanifold of a quaternionic space form satisfying Chen’s equality is minimal.
In [39], Şahin introduced the concept of slant submanifolds as a natural generalization of both quaternionic and totally real submanifolds. A submanifold M of a quaternionic Kähler manifold $\overline{M}$ is said to be a slant submanifold if for each nonzero vector X tangent to M at p, the angle $\theta (X)$ between ${J}_{\alpha}(X)$ and ${T}_{p}M$, $\alpha \in \{1,2,3\}$ is constant, i.e., it does not depend on choice of $p\in M$ and $X\in {T}_{p}M$. We can easily see that quaternionic submanifolds are slant submanifolds with $\theta =0$ and totallyreal submanifolds are slant submanifolds with $\theta =\frac{\pi}{2}$. A slant submanifold of a quaternionic Käler manifold is said to be proper (or θslant proper) if it is neither quaternionic nor totally real.
In [40], the present author obtained the generalization of the first Chen inequality to the case of slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms as follows.
Theorem 3.2 [40]
Let ${M}^{n}$ be a θslant proper submanifold of a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$. Then, for each point $p\in M$, we have
The equality in (16) holds at $p\in M$ if and only if there exists an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{n}\}$ of ${T}_{p}M$ and an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{n+1},\dots ,{e}_{4m}\}$ of ${T}_{p}^{\perp}M$ such that the shape operators ${A}_{r}\equiv {A}_{{e}_{r}}$, $r\in \{n+1,\dots ,4m\}$, take the following forms:
and
The second Chen fundamental inequality, stated in [41], asserts that for any submanifold ${M}^{n}$ of a real space form $\overline{M}$ with constant sectional curvature c, we have
for any ktuples $({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})\in S(n)$. Immersion of a submanifold which realizes equality in this inequality at every point is said to be an ideal immersion.
In [42], Yoon proved that the inequality (19) is also true for totally real submanifolds in a quaternionic space forms of quaternionic sectional curvature 4c. This inequality was later generalized for slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms as follows.
Theorem 3.3 [40]
If ${M}^{n}$ is a θslant proper submanifold of a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$, then we have
for any ktuples $({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})\in S(n)$.
The equality in (20) holds at $p\in M$ if and only if there exists an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{n}\}$ of ${T}_{p}M$ and an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{n+1},\dots ,{e}_{4m}\}$ of ${T}_{p}^{\perp}M$ such that the shape operators ${A}_{r}\equiv {A}_{{e}_{r}}$, $r\in \{n+1,\dots ,4m\}$, take the following forms:
and
where ${a}_{1},\dots ,{a}_{n}$ satisfy
and each ${B}_{j}^{r}$ is a symmetric ${n}_{j}\times {n}_{j}$ submatrix satisfying:
4 Fundamental inequalities involving the Ricci curvature and the squared mean curvature
In [4], Chen established a sharp relationship involving the Ricci curvature and the squared mean curvature for an arbitrary ndimensional Riemannian submanifold of a real space form of constant sectional curvature c,
which is known as the ChenRicci inequality. In [43], Liu obtained the same inequality for totally real submanifolds in quaternionic space forms.
A submanifold M of a quaternion Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is said to be a quaternionic CRsubmanifold if there exists two orthogonal complementary distributions D and ${D}^{\perp}$ on M such that D is invariant under quaternionic structure and ${D}^{\perp}$ is totally real (see [44]). An estimation of the Ricci curvature of a quaternionic CRsubmanifold in a quaternionic space form has been established in [45], as follows.
Theorem 4.1 [45]
Let M be an ndimensional quaternionic CRsubmanifold of a quaternionic space form $\overline{M}(c)$. Then:
(i_{1}) For each unit vector $X\in {D}_{p}^{\perp}$, we have
(i_{2}) For each unit vector $X\in {D}_{p}$, we have

(ii)
If $H(p)=0$, then a unit tangent vector X at p satisfies the equality case of (24) (respectively (25)) if and only if $X\in {D}_{p}^{\perp}\cap {\mathcal{N}}_{p}$ (respectively $X\in {D}_{p}\cap {\mathcal{N}}_{p}$), where ${N}_{p}$ is the relative null space of M at the point $p\in M$ defined by
$${\mathcal{N}}_{p}=\{Z\in {T}_{p}Mh(Z,Y)=0,\mathrm{\forall}Y\in {T}_{p}M\}.$$
We note that an optimal inequality concerning the Ricci curvature for quaternionic CRsubmanifolds of quaternionic space forms with a semisymmetric metric connection was obtained in [46]. It is clear that, although quaternionic CRsubmanifolds are also the generalization of both quaternionic and totally real submanifolds, there exists no inclusion between the two classes of quaternionic CRsubmanifolds and slant submanifolds. The following estimation of the Ricci curvature for slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms was firstly proved in [40], and an alternative nice proof can be found in [47].
Theorem 4.2 [40]
Let ${M}^{n}$ be a θslant proper submanifold of a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$. Then:

(i)
For each unit vector $X\in {T}_{p}M$, we have
$$Ric(X)\le \frac{(n1)c}{4}+\frac{{n}^{2}}{4}{\parallel H\parallel}^{2}+\frac{3c}{8}{cos}^{2}\theta .$$(26) 
(ii)
If $H(p)=0$, then a unit tangent vector X at p satisfies the equality case of (26) if and only if X belongs to the relative null space of M at p.

(iii)
The equality case of (26) holds identically for all unit tangent vectors at p if and only either p is a totally geodesic point or $n=2$ and p is a totally umbilical point.
In [48], Oprea proved using optimization methods that the inequality (23) is not optimal for Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms and obtained an improved ChenRicci inequality. In [49], Deng obtained the proof of the improved inequality as an application of suitable algebraic inequalities. This allows one to determine the equality condition in an explicit form. Recently, in [50], the ChenRicci inequality was improved for Lagrangian submanifolds in quaternionic space forms as follows.
Theorem 4.3 [50]
Let ${M}^{n}$ be a Lagrangian submanifold of real dimension $n\ge 2$ in a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4n}(c)$, p be a point in M and X be a unit tangent vector in ${T}_{p}M$. Then we have
Moreover, the equality sign holds for any unit tangent vector at p if and only if either

(i)
p is a totally geodesic point or

(ii)
$n=2$ and p is an Humbilical point with ${\lambda}_{r}=3{\mu}_{r}$, $r=1,2,3$, i.e., there exists an orthonormal basis $\{{e}_{1},\dots ,{e}_{n}\}$ of ${T}_{p}M$ such that the second fundamental form takes the following simple form:
$$\begin{array}{c}h({e}_{1},{e}_{1})=\sum _{\alpha =1}^{3}{\lambda}_{\alpha}{J}_{\alpha}({e}_{1}),\hfill \\ h({e}_{2},{e}_{2})=\sum _{\alpha =1}^{3}{\mu}_{\alpha}{J}_{\alpha}({e}_{1}),\hfill \\ h({e}_{1},{e}_{j})=\sum _{\alpha =1}^{3}{\mu}_{\alpha}{J}_{\alpha}({e}_{j}),\hfill \\ h({e}_{j},{e}_{k})=0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}j\ne k,j,k=2,\dots ,n\hfill \end{array}$$
for some suitable functions ${\lambda}_{r}$ and ${\mu}_{r}$ satisfying ${\lambda}_{r}=3{\mu}_{r}$, $r=1,2,3$.
5 Fundamental inequalities involving kRicci curvature, squared mean curvature and shape operator
In [4], Chen extended the notion of Ricci curvature to kRicci curvature for a Riemannian manifold and established a sharp relationship between kRicci curvatures and the shape operator and also a sharp relationship between kRicci curvatures and the squared mean curvature for an ndimensional Riemannian submanifold in a real space form $\overline{M}$ with constant sectional curvature c. More precisely, he proved that for any point $p\in M$ and any integer k, $2\le k\le n$, one has
On the other hand, Chen proved that if ${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)\ne c$, then the shape operator at the mean curvature vector satisfies for any integer k, $2\le k\le n$, and any point $p\in M$,
at p, where ${I}_{n}$ denotes the identity map of ${T}_{p}{M}^{n}$.
The inequality (28) was extended in the setting of a totally real submanifold in a quaternionic space form by Liu and Dai in [51] and recently, in [52], both inequalities (28) and (29) were generalized for proper slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms as follows.
Theorem 5.1 [52]
Let ${M}^{n}$ be a θslant proper submanifold of a quaternionic space form ${\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$. Then, for any $p\in M$ and any integer k, $2\le k\le n$, one has
Theorem 5.2 [52]
Let $x:M\to {\overline{M}}^{4m}(c)$ be an isometric immersion of an ndimensional θslant proper submanifold M into a 4mdimensional quaternionic space form $\overline{M}(c)$. Then, for any $p\in M$ and any integer k, $2\le k\le n$, one has:

(i)
If ${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)\ne \frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )$, then the shape operator at the mean curvature satisfies
$${A}_{H}>\frac{n1}{n}[{\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)\frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )]{I}_{n},$$(31)
at p, where ${I}_{n}$ denotes the identity map of ${T}_{p}M$.

(ii)
If ${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)=\frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )$, then ${A}_{H}\ge 0$ at p.

(iii)
A unit vector $X\in {T}_{p}M$ satisfies
$${A}_{H}X=\frac{n1}{n}[{\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)\frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )]X$$(32)
if and only if ${\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)=\frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )$ and X belongs to ${\mathcal{N}}_{p}$, the relative null space of M at p.

(iv)
The identity
$${A}_{H}=\frac{n1}{n}[{\mathrm{\Theta}}_{k}(p)\frac{c}{4}(1+\frac{9}{n1}{cos}^{2}\theta )]{I}_{n}$$(33)
holds at p if and only if p is a totally geodesic point.
6 Some open problems
In this section we propose to investigate the following open problems related to the Chen invariants and ideal immersions in quaternionic space forms.
Problem 6.1 QRsubmanifolds were introduced by Bejancu [53] as a generalization of the real hypersurfaces of a quaternionic Kähler manifold. In fact, a real submanifold M of a quaternionic Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is called a QRsubmanifold if there exists a vector subbundle D of the normal bundle $T{M}^{\perp}$ such that ${J}_{\alpha}({D}_{p})={D}_{p}$ and ${J}_{\alpha}({D}_{p}^{\perp})\subset {T}_{p}M$, for all $p\in M$, $\alpha =1,2,3$ and for any local basis $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ of σ, where ${D}^{\perp}$ is the complementary orthogonal bundle to D in $T{M}^{\perp}$. The problem is to extend the inequalities (15), (19), (23), (28) and (29) for QRsubmanifolds in quaternionic space forms.
Problem 6.2 To generalize the Theorems 3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 5.1 and 5.2 for semislant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms.
We note that the concept of a semislant submanifold in quaternionic geometry was introduced by Şahin [39] as follows: a real submanifold M of a quaternionic Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is said to be a semislant submanifold if there exist two orthogonal vector subbundles μ and ${\mu}^{\perp}$ of the normal bundle $T{M}^{\perp}$ such that $T{M}^{\perp}=\mu \oplus {\mu}^{\perp}$, ${\mu}_{p}^{\perp}$ is antiinvariant with respect to ${J}_{\alpha}$ and ${\mu}_{p}$ is slant with respect to ${J}_{\alpha}$ for all $p\in M$, $\alpha =1,2,3$ and for any local basis $\{{J}_{1},{J}_{2},{J}_{3}\}$ of σ. It is easy to see that this notion is natural because QRsubmanifolds and in particular real hypersurfaces are examples of semislant submanifolds of a quaternionic Kähler manifold and therefore fulfill the main purpose for which semislant submanifolds were introduced in Kähler geometry by Papaghiuc [54]. We also remark that recently, in [55], Shukla and Rao defined another concept of a semislant submanifold of a quaternionic Kähler manifold by analogy with the definition of Papaghiuc, but that class of submanifolds, although generalizes slant submanifolds, does not contain real hypersurfaces as a subclass.
Problem 6.3 Recently, Tripathi [56], Mihai and Rădulescu [57] obtained an improved ChenRicci inequality for Kählerian slant submanifolds in a complex space form. On the other hand, the quaternionic version of a Kählerian slant submanifold has been introduced in [39], under the name of a quaternionic slant submanifold, and some properties were obtained in [52]. Thus a proper slant submanifold M of a quaternionic Kähler manifold $(\overline{M},\sigma ,\overline{g})$ is said to be a quaternionic slant submanifold if it satisfies the condition
for all vector fields X, Y on $\overline{M}$, where the indices are taken from $\{1,2,3\}$ modulo 3 and ${P}_{\alpha}Y$ denotes the tangential component of ${J}_{\alpha}Y$. The problem is to extend the improved ChenRicci inequality (27) to quaternionic slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms and to investigate the equality case of the inequality.
Problem 6.4 In [58], Oprea improved the inequality (15) for Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms and recently, in [59], Chen and Dillen obtained improved general inequalities which involve the squared mean curvature and the invariants $\delta ({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$ for Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms, giving also necessary and sufficient condition for a Lagrangian submanifold to attain the equality for arbitrary $\delta ({n}_{1},\dots ,{n}_{k})$. The problem is to obtain improved general inequalities for Lagrangian submanifolds in quaternionic space forms and to completely classify Lagrangian submanifolds which realize the equality case of these inequalities.
Problem 6.5 In [52] it was proved that there do not exist quaternionic slant immersions of minimal codimension in quaternionic projective space with unfull first normal bundle. An interesting problem is to investigate the existence of quaternionic slant immersions of minimal codimension in a quaternionic projective space ${P}^{n}(\mathbb{H})$ satisfying the equality case of (19) such that either ${n}_{1}+{n}_{2}+\cdots +{n}_{k}=n$ or ${n}_{1}+{n}_{2}+\cdots +{n}_{k}<n$ and at least one of ${n}_{i}$ is 2. We note that the answer of the corresponding problem in Kählerian geometry is negative [60].
Problem 6.6 To completely classify $\delta (2)$ideal slant submanifolds and $\delta (2,2)$ideal Lagrangian submanifolds in quaternionic space forms.
We note that $\delta (2)$ and $\delta (2,2)$ are the simplest nontrivial δcurvature invariants and some classification results for $\delta (2)$ and $\delta (2,2)$ideal Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms were obtained in [61–64].
Problem 6.7 To obtain Chenlike inequalities for the Casorati curvatures of slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms and to completely classify Casorati ideal submanifolds.
It is known that the Casorati curvature of a submanifold in a Riemannian manifold is an extrinsic invariant defined as the normalized square of the length of the second fundamental form. Moreover, this notion extends the concept of the principal direction of a hypersurface of a Riemannian manifold to submanifolds of a Riemannian manifold and it was preferred by Casorati over the traditional Gauss curvature because corresponds better with the common intuition of curvature [65]. Therefore it is of great interest to obtain optimal inequalities for the Casorati curvatures of submanifolds in different ambient spaces. We note that in [66], Decu, Haesen and Verstraelen obtained some optimal inequalities involving the scalar curvature and the Casorati curvature of a Riemannian submanifold in a real space form and the holomorphic sectional curvature and the Casorati curvature of a Kähler hypersurface in a complex space form. Moreover, the same authors proved in [67] an inequality in which the scalar curvature is estimated from above by the normalized Casorati curvatures.
Additional information
This paper is a contribution to the International Conference on Applied Analysis and Algebra (ICAAA2012) (2024 June 2012, Istanbul, Turkey).
References
 1.
Chen BY: Some pinching and classification theorems for minimal submanifolds. Arch. Math. 1993, 60: 568–578. 10.1007/BF01236084
 2.
Chern SS: Minimal Submanifolds in a Riemannian Manifold. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence; 1968.
 3.
Suceavă B, Vâjiac M: Remarks on Chen’s fundamental inequality with classical curvature invariants in Riemannian spaces. An. Ştiint. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iaşi. Mat. 2008, 54(1):27–37.
 4.
Chen BY: Relations between Ricci curvature and shape operator for submanifolds with arbitrary codimensions. Glasg. Math. J. 1999, 41: 33–41. 10.1017/S0017089599970271
 5.
Chen BY: A general inequality for submanifolds in complexspaceforms and its applications. Arch. Math. 1996, 67(6):519–528. 10.1007/BF01270616
 6.
Chen BY: An optimal inequality for CRwarped products in complex space forms involving CR δ invariant. Int. J. Math. 2012., 23(3): Article ID 1250045
 7.
Oiagă A, Mihai I: B.Y. Chen inequalities for slant submanifolds in complex space forms. Demonstr. Math. 1999, 32: 835–846.
 8.
Kim JS, Choi J: A basic inequality for submanifolds in a cosymplectic space form. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2003, 9: 539–547.
 9.
Liu X, Su W: Shape operator of slant submanifolds in cosymplectic space forms. Studia Sci. Math. Hung. 2005, 42(4):387–400.
 10.
Yoon DW: Inequality for Ricci curvature of slant submanifolds in cosymplectic space forms. Turk. J. Math. 2006, 30: 43–56.
 11.
Cioroboiu D, Oiagă A: B.Y. Chen inequalities for slant submanifolds in Sasakian space forms. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 2003, 52: 367–381. 10.1007/BF02872761
 12.
Defever F, Mihai I, Verstraelen L: B.Y. Chen’s inequality for C totally real submanifolds of Sasakian space forms. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital, B 1997, 11(2):365–374.
 13.
Mihai I: Ricci curvature of submanifolds in Sasakian space forms. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 2002, 72(2):247–256. 10.1017/S1446788700003888
 14.
Carriazo A, Kim YH, Yoon DW: Some inequalities on totally real submanifolds in locally conformal Kähler space forms. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2004, 41(5):795–808. 10.4134/JKMS.2004.41.5.795
 15.
Hong S, Matsumoto K, Tripathi MM: Certain basic inequalities for submanifolds of locally conformal Kähler space forms. SUT J. Math. 2005, 41(1):75–94.
 16.
Kim JS, Yoon DW: Inequality for totally real warped products in locally conformal Kaehler space forms. Kyungpook Math. J. 2004, 44(4):585–592.
 17.
Alegre P, Carriazo A, Kim YH, Yoon DW: B.Y. Chen’s inequality for submanifolds of generalized space forms. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2007, 38(3):185–201.
 18.
Kim JS, Song YM, Tripathi MM: B.Y. Chen inequalities for submanifolds in generalized complex space forms. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2003, 40: 411–423.
 19.
Mihai A:Shape operator ${A}_{H}$ for slant submanifolds in generalized complex space forms. Turk. J. Math. 2003, 27(4):509–523.
 20.
Arslan K, Ezentas R, Mihai I, Murathan C, Özgür C: B.Y. Chen inequalities for submanifolds in locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifolds. Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sin. 2001, 29(3):231–242.
 21.
Yoon DW: Inequality for Ricci curvature of certain submanifolds in locally conformal almost cosymplectic manifolds. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2005, 10: 1621–1632.
 22.
Arslan K, Ezentas R, Mihai I, Murathan C, Özgür C:Certain inequalities for submanifolds in $(k,\mu )$contact space forms. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2001, 64(2):201–212. 10.1017/S0004972700039873
 23.
Tripathi MM, Kim JS: C totally real submanifolds in $(\kappa ,\mu )$contact space forms. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2003, 67(1):51–65. 10.1017/S0004972700033517
 24.
Arslan K, Ezentas R, Mihai I, Murathan C, Özgür C: Ricci curvature of submanifolds in Kenmotsu space forms. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2002, 29(12):719–726. 10.1155/S0161171202012863
 25.
Carriazo A, Fernandez LM, HansUber MB: B.Y. Chen’s inequality for S spaceforms: applications to slant immersions. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 34(9):1287–1298.
 26.
Fernández LM, HansUber MB: New relationships involving the mean curvature of slant submanifolds in S spaceforms. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 44(3):647–659. 10.4134/JKMS.2007.44.3.647
 27.
Kim JS, Dwivedi MK, Tripathi MM: Ricci curvature of integral submanifolds of an S space form. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 44(3):395–406. 10.4134/BKMS.2007.44.3.395
 28.
Aktan N, Zeki Sarikaya M, Ozusaglam E: B.Y. Chen’s inequality for semislant submanifolds in T space forms. Balk. J. Geom. Appl. 2008, 13(1):1–10.
 29.
Chen BY Topics in Differential Geometry. In δInvariants, Inequalities of Submanifolds and Their Applications. Ed. Acad. Române, Bucharest; 2008:29–155.
 30.
Chen BY: PseudoRiemannian Geometry, δInvariants and Applications. World Scientific, Hackensack; 2011.
 31.
Berger M: Sur les groupes d’holonomie homogène des variétés à connexion affine et des variétés riemanniennes. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 1955, 83: 279–330.
 32.
Ishihara S: Quaternion Kählerian manifolds. J. Differ. Geom. 1974, 9: 483–500.
 33.
Besse A: Einstein Manifolds. Springer, Berlin; 1987.
 34.
Salamon S: Differential geometry of quaternionic manifolds. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Super. 1986, 19: 31–55.
 35.
Adachi T, Maeda S: Some characterizations of quaternionic space forms. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. A, Math. Sci. 2000, 76(10):168–172. 10.3792/pjaa.76.168
 36.
Gray A:A note on manifolds whose holonomy group is a subgroup of $Sp(n)\cdot Sp(1)$. Mich. Math. J. 1969, 16: 125–128.
 37.
Chen BY, Houh CS: Totally real submanifolds of a quaternion projective space. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 1979, 120(1):185–199. 10.1007/BF02411943
 38.
Hong Y, Houh CS: Lagrangian submanifolds of quaternion Kaehlerian manifolds satisfying Chen’s equality. Beiträge Algebra Geom. 1998, 39(2):413–421.
 39.
Şahin B: Slant submanifolds of quaternion Kaehler manifolds. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2007, 22(1):123–135. 10.4134/CKMS.2007.22.1.123
 40.
Vîlcu GE: B.Y. Chen inequalities for slant submanifolds in quaternionic space forms. Turk. J. Math. 2010, 34(1):115–128.
 41.
Chen BY: Some new obstructions to minimal and Lagrangian isometric immersions. Jpn. J. Math. 2000, 26(1):105–127.
 42.
Yoon DW: A basic inequality of submanifolds in quaternionic space forms. Balk. J. Geom. Appl. 2004, 9(2):92–102.
 43.
Liu X: On Ricci curvature of totally real submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. Arch. Math. 2002, 38(4):297–305.
 44.
Barros M, Chen BY, Urbano F: Quaternion CRsubmanifolds of quaternion manifolds. Kodai Math. J. 1981, 4: 399–417. 10.2996/kmj/1138036425
 45.
Mihai I, AlSolamy F, Shahid MH: On Ricci curvature of a quaternion CRsubmanifold in a quaternion space form. Rad. Mat. 2003, 12(1):91–98.
 46.
Decu S: Optimal inequalities for submanifolds in quaternionspaceforms with semisymmetric metric connection. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Braşov, Ser. III 2009, 2(51):175–184.
 47.
Shahid MH, AlSolamy F: Ricci tensor of slant submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 2011, 349(9):571–573. 10.1016/j.crma.2011.01.013
 48.
Oprea, T: On a geometric inequality. arXiv:math.DG/0511088
 49.
Deng S: An improved ChenRicci inequality. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2009, 2(2):39–45.
 50.
Deng S: Improved ChenRicci inequality for Lagrangian submanifolds in quaternion space forms. Int. Electron. J. Geom. 2012, 5(1):163–170.
 51.
Liu X, Dai W: Ricci curvature of submanifolds in a quaternion projective space. Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 2002, 17(4):625–633.
 52.
Vîlcu GE: Slant submanifolds of quaternionic space forms. Publ. Math. (Debr.) 2012, 81(3–4):397–413.
 53.
Bejancu A: QRsubmanifolds of quaternion Kaehler manifolds. Chin. J. Math. 1986, 14: 81–94.
 54.
Papaghiuc N: Semislant submanifolds of a Kaehlerian manifold. An. Ştiint. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iaşi 1994, 40(1):55–61.
 55.
Shukla SS, Rao PK: Ricci curvature of quaternion slant submanifolds in quaternion space forms. Acta Math. Acad. Paedagog. Nyházi. 2012, 28(1):69–81.
 56.
Tripathi MM: Improved ChenRicci inequality for curvaturelike tensors and its application. Differ. Geom. Appl. 2011, 29(5):685–698. 10.1016/j.difgeo.2011.07.008
 57.
Mihai A, Rădulescu I: An improved ChenRicci inequality for Kaehlerian slant submanifolds in complex space forms. Taiwan. J. Math. 2012, 16(2):761–770.
 58.
Oprea T: Chen’s inequality in the Lagrangian case. Colloq. Math. 2007, 108: 163–169. 10.4064/cm108115
 59.
Chen BY, Dillen F: Optimal general inequalities for Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2011, 379(1):229–239. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.12.058
 60.
Li G, Wu C: Slant immersions of complex space forms and Chen’s inequality. Acta Math. Sci., Ser. B, Engl. Ed. 2005, 25(2):223–232.
 61.
Chen BY, Dillen F, Verstraelen L, Vrancken L:Totally real submanifolds of $C{P}^{n}$ satisfying a basic equality. Arch. Math. 1994, 63(6):553–564. 10.1007/BF01202073
 62.
Chen BY, PrietoMartín A, Wang X:Lagrangian submanifolds in complex space forms satisfying an improved equality involving $\delta (2,2)$. Publ. Math. (Debr.) 2013, 82(1):1–25.
 63.
Chen BY, Vrancken L: Lagrangian submanifolds satisfying a basic equality. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1996, 120(2):291–307. 10.1017/S0305004100074867
 64.
Chen BY, Vrancken L: Lagrangian submanifolds of the complex hyperbolic space. Tsukuba J. Math. 2002, 26(1):95–118.
 65.
Casorati F: Mesure de la courbure des surfaces suivant l’idée commune. Ses rapports avec les mesures de courbure gaussienne et moyenne. Acta Math. 1890, 14(1):95–110. 10.1007/BF02413317
 66.
Decu S, Haesen S, Verstraelen L: Optimal inequalities involving Casorati curvatures. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Braşov, Ser. B 2007, 14(49):85–93. suppl.
 67.
Decu S, Haesen S, Verstraelen L: Optimal inequalities characterising quasiumbilical submanifolds. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math. 2008., 9(3): Article ID 79
Acknowledgements
Dedicated to Prof. Ravi P Agarwal on his 65th birth anniversary.
This work was supported by CNCSUEFISCDI, project number PNIIIDPCE201130118.
Author information
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Chen’s invariant
 squared mean curvature
 shape operator
 quaternionic space form
 slant submanifold