- Research
- Open access
- Published:

# Inequalities for eigenvalues of matrices

*Journal of Inequalities and Applications*
**volume 2013**, Article number: 6 (2013)

## Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to present some inequalities for eigenvalues of positive semidefinite matrices.

**MSC:**15A18, 15A60.

## 1 Introduction

Throughout this paper, {M}_{n} denotes the space of n\times n complex matrices and {H}_{n} denotes the set of all Hermitian matrices in {M}_{n}. Let A,B\in {H}_{n}; the order relation A\ge B means, as usual, that A-B is positive semidefinite. We always denote the singular values of *A* by {s}_{1}(A)\ge \cdots \ge {s}_{n}(A). If *A* has real eigenvalues, we label them as {\lambda}_{1}(A)\ge \cdots \ge {\lambda}_{n}(A). Let \parallel \cdot \parallel denote any unitarily invariant norm on {M}_{n}. We denote by |A| the absolute value operator of *A*, that is, |A|={({A}^{\ast}A)}^{\frac{1}{2}}, where {A}^{\ast} is the adjoint operator of *A*.

For positive real number *a*, *b*, the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality says that

It is equivalent to

Let A,B\in {M}_{n} be positive semidefinite. Bhatia and Kittaneh [1] proved that for all m=1,2,\dots ,

This is a matrix version of (1.1). For more information on matrix versions of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, the reader is referred to [1–11] and the references therein.

It is easy to see that the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality is also equivalent to

As pointed out in [10], p.198], although the arithmetic-geometric mean inequalities can be written in different ways and each of them may be obtained from the other, the matrix versions suggested by them are different.

In this note, we obtain a refinement of (1.2) and a log-majorization inequality for eigenvalues. As an application of our result, we give a matrix version of (1.3).

## 2 Main results

We begin this section with the following lemma, which is a question posed by Bhatia and Kittaneh [1] (see also [8, 10]) and settled in the affirmative by Drury in [2].

**Lemma 2.1** *Let* A,B\in {M}_{n} *be positive semidefinite*. *Then*

*As a consequence of Lemma * 2.1, *we have*

*It is a matrix version of the arithmetic*-*geometric mean inequality*. *By properties of the matrix square function*, *we know that this last inequality is stronger than the assertion*

*which is due to Bhatia and Kittaneh* [1]*and is also a matrix version of* (1.1).

**Theorem 2.1** *Let* A,B\in {M}_{n} *be positive semidefinite*. *Then for all* m=1,2,\dots ,

*Proof* By Lemma 2.1, we have

Replacing *A*, *B* by {A}^{1/2}, {B}^{1/2} in (2.3), we have

This completes the proof. □

**Remark 2.1** Let A,B\in {M}_{n} be positive semidefinite. Note that

Therefore, the inequality (2.2) is a refinement of the inequality (1.2).

**Remark 2.2** For m=1, by (1.2), we have

For m=1, by (2.2), we have

In view of the inequalities (2.4) and (2.5), one may ask whether it is true that

for all m=1,2,\dots . The answer is no. For m=3, the inequality (2.6) is refuted by the following example:

**Theorem 2.2** *Let* A,B\in {M}_{n} *be positive semidefinite*. *Then*

*Proof* By Weyl’s inequality, Horn’s inequality and Lemma 2.1, we have

Putting

in (2.7) gives

In response to a conjecture by Zhan [11], Audenaert [3] proved that if 0\le v\le 1, then

The special case where v=\frac{1}{2} was obtained earlier in [6, 12] and the special case where v=\frac{1}{4} was obtained earlier in [13]. It follows from (2.8) and (2.9) that

This completes the proof. □

**Remark 2.3** As an application of Theorem 2.2, we now present a matrix version of (1.3). Taking v=\frac{1}{2} in this last inequality, we have

and so

which is equivalent to

Since weak log-majorization is stronger than weak majorization, we have

By Fan’s dominance theorem [4], p.93], we get

This is a matrix version of (1.3).

Next, we give another proof of the inequality (2.10). Araki [14] (also see [15]) obtained the following log-majorization inequality:

Putting

in (2.11) gives

and so

By Fan’s dominance theorem [4], p.93], we get

It follows from (2.1) and (2.12) that

## References

Bhatia R, Kittaneh F: Notes on matrix arithmetic-geometric mean inequalities.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2000, 308: 203–211. 10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00048-3Drury SW: On a question of Bhatia and Kittaneh.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2012, 437: 1955–1960. 10.1016/j.laa.2012.04.040Audenaert KMR: A singular value inequality for Heinz means.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2007, 422: 279–283. 10.1016/j.laa.2006.10.006Bhatia R:

*Matrix Analysis*. Springer, New York; 1997.Bhatia R, Davis C: More matrix forms of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.

*SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.*1993, 14: 132–136. 10.1137/0614012Bhatia R, Kittaneh F: On the singular values of a product of operators.

*SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl.*1990, 11: 272–277. 10.1137/0611018Bhatia R: Interpolating the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality and its operator version.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2006, 413: 355–363. 10.1016/j.laa.2005.03.005Bhatia R, Kittaneh F: The matrix arithmetic-geometric mean inequality revisited.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2008, 428: 2177–2191. 10.1016/j.laa.2007.11.030Kosaki H: Arithmetic-geometric mean and related inequalities for operators.

*J. Funct. Anal.*1998, 156: 429–451. 10.1006/jfan.1998.3258Bhatia R:

*Positive Definite Matrices*. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 2007.Zhan X Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1790. In

*Matrix Inequalities*. Springer, Berlin; 2002.Ando T: Matrix Young inequalities. Oper. Theory Adv. Appl. 75.

*Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices*1995, 33–38.Tao Y: More results on singular value inequalities of matrices.

*Linear Algebra Appl.*2006, 416: 724–729. 10.1016/j.laa.2005.12.017Araki H: On an inequality of Lieb and Thirring.

*Lett. Math. Phys.*1990, 19: 167–170. 10.1007/BF01045887Hiai F: Matrix analysis: matrix monotone functions, matrix means, and majorization.

*Interdiscip. Inf. Sci.*2010, 16: 139–248.

## Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their heartfelt thanks to the referees for their detailed and helpful suggestions for revising the manuscript.

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Additional information

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally to the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Xu, X., He, C. Inequalities for eigenvalues of matrices.
*J Inequal Appl* **2013**, 6 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-6

Received:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-6