Open Access

Some results on continuous pseudo-contractions in a reflexive Banach space

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20132013:538

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-538

Received: 17 April 2013

Accepted: 1 October 2013

Published: 13 November 2013

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate fixed point problems of a continuous pseudo-contraction based on a viscosity iterative scheme. Strong convergence theorems are established in a reflexive Banach space which also enjoys a weakly continuous duality mapping.

MSC:47H05, 47H09, 47H10, 47J05, 47J25.

Keywords

fixed pointBanach spaceweakly continuous duality mappingpseudo-contraction

1 Introduction and preliminaries

Fixed point problems of nonlinear operators, which include many important problems in nonlinear analysis and optimization such as the Nash equilibrium problem, variational inequalities, complementarity problems, vector optimization problems, and saddle point problems, recently have been studied as an effective and powerful tool for studying many real world problems which arise in economics, finance, medicine, image reconstruction, ecology, transportation, and network; see [120] and the references therein. Interest in pseudo-contractive operators, an important class of nonlinear operators, stems mainly from their firm connection with equations of evolution. It is known that many physically significant problems can be modeled by initial value problems of the form x ( t ) + x ( t ) A x ( t ) = 0 , x ( 0 ) = x 0 , where A is a pseudo-contractive operator in the framework of Banach spaces. Typical examples where such evolution equations occur can be found in the heat, wave or Schrödinger equations. Fixed points of a pseudo-contractive operator have been investigated by many authors; see [2132] and the references therein. For the existence of fixed points of pseudo-contractive operators, we refer readers to [31] and [32] and the references therein. In this paper, we consider the mean regularization viscosity method for treating fixed points of pseudo-contractive operators in a Banach space.

Let E be a real Banach space, E be the dual space of E. Let φ : [ 0 , ] : = R + R + be a continuous and strictly increasing function such that φ ( 0 ) = 0 and φ ( t ) as t . This function φ is called a gauge function. The duality mapping J φ : E E associated with a gauge function φ is defined by
J φ ( x ) = { f E : x , f = x φ ( x ) , f = φ ( x ) } , x E ,

where , denotes the generalized duality pairing. In the case that φ ( t ) = t , we write J for J φ and call J the normalized duality mapping.

Recall that a Banach space E is said to have a weakly continuous duality mapping if there exists a gauge φ for which the duality mapping J φ ( x ) is single-valued and weak-to-weak sequentially continuous (i.e., if { x n } is a sequence in E weakly convergent to a point x, then the sequence J φ ( x n ) converges weakly to J φ ). It is known that l p has a weakly continuous duality mapping with a gauge function φ ( t ) = t p 1 for all 1 < p < . Set Φ ( t ) = 0 t φ ( τ ) d τ , t 0 . Then J φ ( x ) = Φ ( x ) , x X , where denotes the sub-differential in the sense of convex analysis.

Let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let D be a nonempty subset of C, and let Q be a mapping of C into D. Then Q is said to be sunny if
Q ( Q x + t ( x Q x ) ) = Q x ,

whenever Q x + t ( x Q x ) C for x C and t 0 . A mapping Q of C into itself is called a retraction if Q 2 = Q . If a mapping Q of C into itself is a retraction, then Q z = z for all z R ( Q ) , where R ( Q ) is the range of Q. A nonempty subset D of C is called a sunny nonexpansive retract of C if there exists a sunny nonexpansive retraction from C onto D.

Let T : C C be a nonlinear mapping. In this paper, we use F ( T ) to denote the fixed point set of the mapping T. Recall that T is contractive with the coefficient k ( 0 , 1 ) if
T x T y k x y , x , y C .

The mapping T is said to be nonexpansive if the contractive coefficient k = 1 .

One classical way to study nonexpansive mappings is to use contractions to approximate a nonexpansive mapping [21, 33, 34]. More precisely, take t ( 0 , 1 ) and define a contraction T t : C C by
T t x = t u + ( 1 t ) T x , x C ,
(1.1)

where u C is a fixed point. Banach’s contraction mapping principle guarantees that T t has a unique fixed point x t in C. In the case of T having a fixed point, Browder [1] proved that if E is a Hilbert space, then x t converges strongly to a fixed point of T that is nearest to u. Reich [33] extended Browder’s result to the setting of Banach spaces and proved that if E is a uniformly smooth Banach space, then x t converges strongly to a fixed point of T and the limit defines the (unique) sunny nonexpansive retraction from C onto F ( T ) .

Xu [34] proved that Reich’s results hold in reflexive Banach spaces which have a weakly continuous duality map. To be more precise, he proved the following theorem.

Theorem X Let E be a reflexive Banach space and have a weakly continuous duality map J φ with a gauge φ. Let C be a closed convex subset of E, and let T : C C be a nonexpansive mapping. Fix u C and t ( 0 , 1 ) . Let x t C be the unique solution in C to the equation
x t = t u + ( 1 t ) T x t .

Then T has a fixed point if and only if { x t } remains bounded as t 0 + , and in this case, { x t } converges as t 0 + strongly to a fixed point of T.

Recall that the mapping T : C C is strongly pseudo-contractive with the coefficient k ( 0 , 1 ) if
T x T y , J φ ( x y ) k x y φ ( x y ) , x , y C .

The mapping T is said to be pseudo-contractive if the coefficient k = 1 .

Recently, Zegeye and Shahzad [35] improved Theorem X about the mapping T from nonexpansive mappings to pseudo-contractions by the viscosity approximation method which was first introduced by Moudafi [36]. More precisely, they proved the following results.

Theorem ZS Let K be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Banach space E. Let T : K E be a continuous pseudo-contractive mapping and f : K E be a contraction (with constant β) both satisfying the weakly inward condition. Then, for t ( 0 , 1 ) , there exists a sequence { y t } K satisfying the following condition:
y t = ( 1 t ) f ( y t ) + t T y t .

Suppose further that { y t } is bounded or ( F ( T ) ) and E is a reflexive Banach space having a weakly continuous duality mapping J φ for some gauge φ. Then { y t } converges strongly to a fixed point of T.

We give some remarks about Moudafi’s viscosity approximation method which was recently studied by many authors. From Suzuki [37], we know that Moudafi’s viscosity approximation with a contraction is trivial. Since the mapping P C f , where P C is a metric projection from H onto its nonempty closed and convex subset C, is a contraction, we can get the conclusion if Browder’s property is satisfied; see [37] for more details.

Next, we propose the following question.

What happens if the mapping f is a strong pseudo-contraction instead of a contraction? Does Theorem ZS still hold?

Since we do not know whether the mapping P C f , where f is a strong pseudo-contraction, has a unique fixed point or not, we cannot answer the above question easily based on Suzuki’s results.

It is our purpose in this paper to consider the convergence of paths for a continuous pseudo-contraction by Moudafi’s viscosity approximation with continuous strong pseudo-contractions instead of contractions, which gives an answer to the above question.

To prove our main results, we need the following lemma and definitions.

Let C be a nonempty subset of a Banach space E. For x C , the inward set of x, I C ( x ) , is defined by I C ( x ) : = { x + λ ( u x ) : u C , λ 1 } . A mapping T : C E is called weakly inward if T x c l [ I C ( x ) ] for all x C , where c l [ I C ( x ) ] denotes the closure of the inward set. Every self-map is trivially weakly inward.

The first part of the next lemma is an immediate consequence of the subdifferential inequality and the proof of the second part can be found in [38].

Lemma 1.1 Assume that a Banach space E has a weakly continuous duality mapping J φ with a gauge φ.
  1. (i)
    For all x , y E , the following inequality holds:
    Φ ( x + y ) Φ ( x ) + y , J φ ( x + y ) .
     
  2. (ii)
    Assume that a sequence { x n } in E converges weakly to a point x E . Then the following identity holds:
    lim sup n Φ ( x n y ) = lim sup n Φ ( x n x ) + Φ ( y x ) , x , y E .
     

Lemma 1.2 [31]

Let E be a Banach space, C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E and T : C C be a continuous and strong pseudo-contraction. Then T has a unique fixed point in C.

2 Main results

Lemma 2.1 Let C be nonempty closed and convex subset of a real Banach space E, and let T : C C be a continuous pseudo-contraction. Let f : C C be a fixed continuous bounded and strong pseudo-contraction with the pseudo-contractive coefficient k ( 0 , 1 ) . For t ( 0 , 1 ) , define a mapping T t f by
T t f x = t f ( x ) + ( 1 t ) T x , x C .
(2.1)
Then
  1. (i)

    (2.1) has a unique solution x t C for every t ( 0 , 1 ) ;

     
  2. (ii)

    If { x t } is bounded, then x t T x t 0 as t 0 ;

     
  3. (iii)
    If F ( T ) , where F ( T ) denotes the fixed point set of T, then { x t } is bounded and satisfies
    x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) 0 , p F ( T ) .
     
Proof (i) Indeed, for any x , y C and t ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
T t f x T t f y , J φ ( x y ) = t f ( x ) f ( y ) , J φ ( x y ) + ( 1 t ) T x T y , J φ ( x y ) t k x y φ ( x y ) + ( 1 t ) x y φ ( x y ) = [ 1 t ( 1 k ) ] x y φ ( x y ) .

This shows that T t f : C C is a continuous and strong pseudo-contraction for each t ( 0 , 1 ) . By Lemma 1.2, we obtain that T t f has a unique fixed point x t in C for each t ( 0 , 1 ) . Therefore, one obtains that (i) holds.

(ii) It follows from (i) that
x t = t f ( x t ) + ( 1 t ) T x t
(2.2)
for each t ( 0 , 1 ) . It follows from (2.2) that
x t T x t = t f ( x t ) T x t .
Noticing the boundedness of f and { x t } , we have
lim t 0 x t T x t = 0 .
(2.3)
(iii) For p F ( T ) , we see that
x t p φ ( x t p ) = x t p , J φ ( x t p ) = t f ( x t ) p , J φ ( x t p ) + ( 1 t ) T x t p , J φ ( x t p ) t f ( x t ) f ( p ) , J φ ( x t p ) + t f ( p ) p , J φ ( x t p ) + ( 1 t ) T x t p , J φ ( x t p ) t k x t p φ ( x t p ) + t f ( p ) p , J φ ( x t p ) + ( 1 t ) x t p φ ( x t p ) = [ 1 t ( 1 k ) ] x t p φ ( x t p ) + t f ( p ) p , J φ ( x t p ) .
It follows that
x t p φ ( x t p ) 1 1 k f ( p ) p , J φ ( x t p ) .
(2.4)
That is, x t p 1 1 k f ( p ) p , t ( 0 , 1 ) . This shows that { x t } is bounded. Noticing x t f ( x t ) = ( 1 t ) ( T x t f ( x t ) ) , we arrive at
x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) = ( 1 t ) T x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) = ( 1 t ) T x t x t , J φ ( x t p ) + ( 1 t ) x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) = ( 1 t ) ( T x t p , J φ ( x t p ) x t p φ ( x t p ) ) + ( 1 t ) x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) ( 1 t ) x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p )
and hence
x t f ( x t ) , J φ ( x t p ) 0 , p F ( T ) .

This completes the proof. □

Theorem 2.2 Let E be a reflexive Banach space which has a weakly continuous duality mapping J φ for some gauge φ, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let T : C C be a continuous pseudo-contraction and f : C C be a fixed bounded, continuous and strong pseudo-contraction with the coefficient k ( 0 , 1 ) . Let { x t } be as in Lemma 2.1.
x t = t f ( x t ) + ( 1 t ) T x t .
If { x t } is bounded, then { x t } converges strongly to a fixed point p of T as t 0 , which is the unique solution in F ( T ) to the following variational inequality:
f ( p ) p , J φ ( y p ) 0 , y F ( T ) .
Proof Since { x t } is bounded and E is reflexive, there exists a subnet { x t α } of { x t } such that x t α p as t α 0 . Put
g ( x ) = lim sup n Φ ( x t α x ) , x E .
(2.5)
It follows from Lemma 1.1 that
g ( x ) = g ( p ) + Φ ( x p ) , x E .
(2.6)
For any y C , define a mapping S : C C by
S x = 1 2 y + 1 2 T x , x C .
It is easy to see that S is a continuous strong pseudo-contraction. From Lemma 1.2, we see that S has a unique fixed point x in C, that is, x = 1 2 y + 1 2 T x . This implies that
y = ( 2 I T ) x ( 2 I T ) ( C ) .
This shows that C ( 2 I T ) ( C ) . Define another mapping H : C C by
H x = ( 2 I T ) 1 x , x C .
We see that H is a nonexpansive mapping. Indeed, for any x , y C , we have
H x H y = ( 2 I T ) 1 x ( 2 I T ) 1 y ( I + ( I T ) ) 1 x ( I + ( I T ) ) 1 y x y .
We also see that F ( H ) = F ( T ) . Indeed,
x = H x 2 x T x = x x = T x .
From Lemma 2.1, we obtain that
x t α T x t α 0
(2.7)
as t α 0 . On the other hand, for x C , we have
x H x = H H 1 x H x H 1 x x = ( 2 I T ) x x = x T x .
It follows from (2.7) that x t α H x t α 0 , as t α 0 . From (2.5), we arrive at
g ( H p ) = lim sup n Φ ( x t α H p ) = lim sup n Φ ( H x t α H p ) lim sup n Φ ( x t α p ) = g ( p ) .
(2.8)

On the other hand, from (2.6), we obtain that g ( H p ) = g ( p ) + Φ ( H p p ) . It follows from (2.8) that Φ ( H p p ) = 0 . Hence, p F ( H ) = F ( T ) .

Next, we show that x t α converges strongly to p. From (2.4), we see that
x t α p φ ( x t α p ) 1 1 k f ( p ) p , J φ ( x t α p ) .

It follows that x t α p .

Finally, we show that the entire net { x t } converges strongly to p. If there exists another subset { x t β } of { x t } such that { x t β } q , then q is also a fixed point of T. By using (iii) of Lemma 2.1, we have
p f ( p ) , J φ ( p q ) 0 and q f ( q ) , J φ ( q p ) 0 .

Adding up the above inequalities, we obtain that p = q . This completes the proof. □

Remark 2.3 In the case that T and f are non-self mappings, we remark that the results of Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 still hold under the assumption that both T and f satisfy the weak inward condition. We give an affirmative answer to the question purposed in Section 1.

Remark 2.4 It is clear that every contraction is a continuous, bounded and strong pseudo-contraction. The main results in this paper develop the so-called viscosity approximation method which was first introduced by Moudafi [36] from the class of contractions to the class of strong pseudo-contractions.

If f ( x ) = u C for all x C in Theorem 2.2, we have the following result.

Corollary 2.5 Let E be a reflexive Banach space which has a weakly continuous duality mapping J φ for some gauge φ, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let T : C C be a continuous pseudo-contraction. Fix u C and t ( 0 , 1 ) . Let { x t } be the unique solution of the equation x t = t u + ( 1 t ) T x t . If { x t } is bounded, then { x t } converges strongly to a fixed point p of T as t 0 .

Remark 2.6 Corollary 2.5 improves Theorem X (Theorem 3.1 of Xu [34]). To be more precise, it improves the mapping T from a nonexpansive mapping to continuous pseudo-contractions.

Remark 2.7 In the case that T is a non-self mapping, we remark that Corollary 2.5 still holds under the assumption that T satisfies the weak inward condition.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the reviewers for useful suggestions which improved the contents of the article. The first author was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (122300410420). The second author was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Y6110270).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematics and Information Science, Shangqiu Normal University
(2)
School of Mathematics Physics and Information Science, Zhejiang Ocean University

References

  1. Iiduka H: Fixed point optimization algorithm and its application to network bandwidth allocation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2012, 236: 1733–1742. 10.1016/j.cam.2011.10.004MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Noor MA, Noor KI, Waseem M: Decomposition method for solving system of linear equations. Eng. Math. Lett. 2013, 2: 34–41.Google Scholar
  3. Dhage BC, Jadhav NS: Differential inequalities and comparison theorems for first order hybrid integro-differential equations. Adv. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 2: 61–80.Google Scholar
  4. Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of fixed points of pseudocontraction semigroups based on a viscosity iterative process. Appl. Math. Lett. 2011, 24: 224–228. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.09.008MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Censor Y, Cohen N, Kutscher T, Shamir J: Summed squared distance error reduction by simultaneous multiprojections and applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2002, 126: 157–179. 10.1016/S0096-3003(00)00144-2MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Shen J, Pang LP: An approximate bundle method for solving variational inequalities. Commun. Optim. Theory 2012, 1: 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. He RH: Coincidence theorem and existence theorems of solutions for a system of Ky Fan type minimax inequalities in FC-spaces. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 47–57.Google Scholar
  8. Cho SY, Kang SM: Approximation of common solutions of variational inequalities via strict pseudocontractions. Acta Math. Sci. 2012, 32: 1607–1618. 10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60127-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Abdel-Salam HS, Al-Khaled K: Variational iteration method for solving optimization problems. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 2: 1475–1497.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Qin X, Chang SS, Cho YJ: Iterative methods for generalized equilibrium problems and fixed point problems with applications. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 11: 2963–2972. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.10.017MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Strong convergence theorem for a common point of solution of variational inequality and fixed point problem. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2012, 2: 374–397.Google Scholar
  12. Kang SM, Cho SY, Liu Z: Convergence of iterative sequences for generalized equilibrium problems involving inverse-strongly monotone mappings. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 827082Google Scholar
  13. Luo H, Wang Y: Iterative approximation for the common solutions of a infinite variational inequality system for inverse-strongly accretive mappings. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 2: 1660–1670.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Iiduka H: Strong convergence for an iterative method for the triple-hierarchical constrained optimization problem. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: e1292-e1297. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.133MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim JK: Strong convergence theorems by hybrid projection methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of the asymptotically quasi- ϕ -nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 10Google Scholar
  16. Qin X, Cho SY, Kang SM: Iterative algorithms for variational inequality and equilibrium problems with applications. J. Glob. Optim. 2010, 48: 423–445. 10.1007/s10898-009-9498-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Al-Bayati AY, Al-Kawaz RZ: A new hybrid WC-FR conjugate gradient-algorithm with modified secant condition for unconstrained optimization. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2012, 2: 937–966.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Lv S: Strong convergence of a general iterative algorithm in Hilbert spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013., 2013: Article ID 19Google Scholar
  19. Lv S:Generalized systems of variational inclusions involving ( A , η ) -monotone mappings. Adv. Fixed Point Theory 2011, 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
  20. Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM: Convergence theorems of common elements for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Banach spaces. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 225: 20–30. 10.1016/j.cam.2008.06.011MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Browder FE: Fixed point theorems for noncompact mappings in Hilbert spaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1965, 53: 1272–1276. 10.1073/pnas.53.6.1272MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cho YJ: Some results on k-strictly pseudo-contractive mappings in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 1956–1964. 10.1016/j.na.2008.02.094MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang SS, Cho YJ, Kim JK: Some results for uniformly L -Lipschitzian mappings in Banach spaces. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009, 22: 121–125. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.02.016MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chang SS, Cho YJ, Lee BS, Jung JS, Kang SM: Iterative approximations of fixed points and solutions for strongly accretive and strongly pseudo-contractive mappings in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 224: 149–165. 10.1006/jmaa.1998.5993MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Morales CH: Strong convergence of path for continuous pseudo-contractive mappings. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2007, 135: 2831–2838. 10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08910-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Morales CH, Jung JS: Convergence of paths for pseudo-contractive mappings in Banach spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2000, 128: 3411–3419. 10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05573-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang ZM: Convergence theorem on total asymptotically pseudocontractive mappings. J. Math. Comput. Sci. 2013, 3: 788–798.Google Scholar
  28. Wu C, Cho SY, Shang M: Moudafi’s viscosity approximations with demi-continuous and strong pseudo-contractions for non-expansive semigroups. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 645498Google Scholar
  29. Lan KQ, Wu JH: Convergence of approximants for demicontinuous pseudo-contractive maps in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2002, 49: 737–746. 10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00130-4MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Qin X, Cho YJ, Kang SM, Zhou H: Convergence theorems of common fixed points for a family of Lipschitz quasi-pseudocontractions. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 71: 685–690. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.102MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Deimling K: Zeros of accretive operators. Manuscr. Math. 1974, 13: 365–374. 10.1007/BF01171148MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou H: Demiclosedness principle with applications for asymptotically pseudo-contractions in Hilbert spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 2009, 70: 3140–3145. 10.1016/j.na.2008.04.017MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Reich S: Strong convergence theorems for resolvents of accretive operators in Banach spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1980, 75: 287–292. 10.1016/0022-247X(80)90323-6MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu HK: Strong convergence of an iterative method for nonexpansive and accretive operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2006, 314: 631–643. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.04.082MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Zegeye H, Shahzad N: Approximation methods for a common fixed point of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 2007, 28: 1405–1419. 10.1080/01630560701749730MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Moudafi A: Viscosity approximation methods for fixed-points problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2000, 241: 46–55. 10.1006/jmaa.1999.6615MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Suzuki T: Moudafi’s viscosity approximations with Meir-Keeler contractions. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 325: 342–352. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.01.080MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Lim TC, Xu HK: Fixed point theorems for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 1994, 22: 1345–1355. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)90116-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lv and Hao; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.