- Open Access
Estimating the polygamma functions for negative integers
© Salem and Kiliçman; licensee Springer. 2013
- Received: 25 September 2013
- Accepted: 25 September 2013
- Published: 9 November 2013
The polygamma functions are defined for all and . In this paper, the concepts of neutrix and neutrix limit are applied to generalize and redefine the polygamma functions for all and . Also, further results are given.
- gamma function
- polygamma functions
- neutrix limits
Neutrices are additive groups of negligible functions that do not contain any constants except zero. Their calculus was developed by van der Corput  and Hadamard in connection with asymptotic series and divergent integrals. Recently, the concepts of neutrix and neutrix limit have been used widely in many applications in mathematics, physics and statistics.
For example, Jack Ng and van Dam applied the neutrix calculus, in conjunction with the Hadamard integral developed by van der Corput, to the quantum field theories, in particular, to obtain finite results for the coefficients in the perturbation series. They also applied the neutrix calculus to quantum field theory and obtained finite renormalization in the loop calculations, see  and .
Ozcag et al. [9, 10] applied the neutrix limit to extend the definition of incomplete beta function and its partial derivatives for negative integers. Also, the digamma function was generalized for negative integers by Jolevska-Tuneska et al. . Salem [12, 13] applied the neutrix limit to redefine the q-gamma and the incomplete q-gamma functions and their derivatives. In continuation, in this paper, we apply the concepts of neutrix and neutrix limit to generalize and redefine the polygamma functions.
A neutrix N is defined as a commutative additive group of functions defined on a domain with values in an additive group , where further if for some f in N, for all , then . The functions in N are called negligible functions.
Let N be a set contained in a topological space with a limit point a which does not belong to N. If is a function defined on with values in and it is possible to find a constant c such that , then c is called the neutrix limit of f as ξ tends to a, and we write .
Note that if a neutrix limit c exists, then it is unique, since if and are in N, then the constant function is also in N and so .
and all functions which converge to zero in the normal sense as ϵ tends to zero .
where γ denotes Euler’s constant, see .
where γ is also Euler’s constant.
which is correct for all ; however, if , then is undefined, and we will give the exact formula for (2.12) in the following section.
In the present section, we seek to redefine the polygamma functions for all and .
Notice that the sum consists of (linear sum of ) negligible functions which can be neglected when taking the neutrix limit as . Taking the neutrix limit as yields the desired results. □
exists for all values of .
exist for all and thus integral (3.4) also exists. □
The results obtained in Lemma 3.1 and definition (3.1) complete the proof. □
The above theorems lead us to introducing the following.
for all and .
Remark 3.8 Formula (3.13) is the correct formula of (2.12).
The authors would like to thank the referee(s) for valuable remarks and suggestions on the previous version of the manuscript.
- van der Corput JG: Introduction to the neutrix calculus. J. Anal. Math. 1960, 7: 291–398.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Ng YJ, van Dam H: Neutrix calculus and finite quantum field theory. J. Phys. A 2005, 38(18):L317-L323. 10.1088/0305-4470/38/18/L03MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ng YJ, van Dam H: An application of neutrix calculus to quantum theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2006, 21(2):297–312. 10.1142/S0217751X06025225MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B:On defining the incomplete gamma function . Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2004, 15(6):467–476. 10.1080/10652460412331270698MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Jolevska-Tuneska B, Kılıçman A: On defining the incomplete gamma function. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 2003, 14(4):293–299. 10.1080/1065246031000081667MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Kılıçman A, Nicholas D: On the beta function and the neutrix product of distributions. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 1998, 7(1–2):35–42. 10.1080/10652469808819184MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Kuribayashi Y: Neutrices and the beta function. Rostock. Math. Kolloqu. 1987, 32: 56–66.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Kuribayashi Y: Neutrices and the gamma function. J. Fac. Ed. Tottori Univ. Math. Sci. 1987, 36(1–2):1–7.Google Scholar
- Ozcag E, Ege I, Gurcay H: On partial derivative of the incomplete beta function. Appl. Math. Lett. 2008, 21: 675–681. 10.1016/j.aml.2007.07.020MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozcag E, Ege I, Gurcay H: An extension of the incomplete beta function for negative integers. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 338: 984–992. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.075MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jolevska-Tuneska B, Jolevski I: Some results on the digamma function. Appl. Math. Inform. Sci. 2013, 7(1):167–170. 10.12785/amis/070120MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salem A: The neutrix limit of the q -gamma function and its derivatives. Appl. Math. Lett. 2010, 23: 1262–1268. 10.1016/j.aml.2010.06.010MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Salem A: Existence of the neutrix limit of the q -analogue of the incomplete gamma function and its derivatives. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25: 363–368. 10.1016/j.aml.2011.09.015MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abramowitz M, Stegun CA National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series 55. In Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, Mathematical Tables. National Bureau of Standards, Washington; 1964. 7th printingGoogle Scholar
- Ozcag E, Ege I, Gurcay H, Jolevska-Tuneska B: Some remarks on the incomplete gamma function. In Mathematical Methods in Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht; 2007:97–108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fisher B, Kılıçman A: Some results on the gamma function for negative integers. Appl. Math. Inform. Sci. 2012, 6(2):173–176.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.