 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Some coincidence and common fixed point theorems for ordered PrešićReich type contractions
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 520 (2013)
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to prove some coincidence and common fixed point theorems for ordered PrešićReich type contractions in ordered metric spaces. Results of this paper generalize and extend several known results from metric spaces into product spaces when the underlying space is an ordered metric space. An example illustrates the case when new results can be applied while old ones cannot.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
The wellknown Banach contraction mapping principle states that if (X,d) is a complete metric space and f:X\to X is a selfmapping such that
for all x,y\in X, where 0\le \lambda <1, then there exists a unique x\in X such that fx=x. This point x is called the fixed point of the mapping f. On the other hand, for mappings f:X\to X, Kannan [1] introduced the contractive condition
for all x,y\in X, where \lambda \in [0,\frac{1}{2}) is a constant and proved a fixed point theorem using (2) instead of (1). Conditions (1) and (2) are independent, as it was shown by two examples in [2].
Reich [3], for mappings f:X\to X, generalized Banach and Kannan fixed point theorems using the contractive condition
for all x,y\in X, where α, β, γ are nonnegative constants with \alpha +\beta +\gamma <1. An example in [3] shows that condition (3) is a proper generalization of (1) and (2).
In 1965, Prešić [4, 5] extended the Banach contraction mapping principle to mappings defined on product spaces and proved the following theorem.
Theorem 1.1 Let (X,d) be a complete metric space, k be a positive integer and f:{X}^{k}\to X be a mapping satisfying the following contractive type condition:
for every {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X, where {q}_{1},{q}_{2},\dots ,{q}_{k} are nonnegative constants such that {q}_{1}+{q}_{2}+\cdots +{q}_{k}<1. Then there exists a unique point x\in X such that f(x,x,\dots ,x)=x. Moreover, if {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k} are arbitrary points in X and for n\in \mathbb{N}, {x}_{n+k}=f({x}_{n},{x}_{n+1},\dots ,{x}_{n+k1}), then the sequence \{{x}_{n}\} is convergent and lim{x}_{n}=f(lim{x}_{n},lim{x}_{n},\dots ,lim{x}_{n}).
Note that condition (4) in the case k=1 reduces to the wellknown Banach contraction mapping principle. So, Theorem 1.1 is a generalization of the Banach fixed point theorem. Some generalizations and applications of the Prešić theorem can be seen in [4–19].
The existence of a fixed point in partially ordered sets was investigated by Ran and Reurings [20] and then by Nieto and Lopez [21, 22]. Fixed point results in ordered metric spaces were obtained by several authors (see, e.g., [6, 18, 23–32]). The following version of the fixed point theorem was proved, among others, in these papers.
Theorem 1.2 (see [22] and references therein)
Let (X,\u2aaf) be a partially ordered set, and let d be a metric on X such that (X,d) is a complete metric space. Let f:X\to X be a nondecreasing map with respect to ⪯. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i)
there exists k\in (0,1) such that d(fx,fy)\le kd(x,y) for all x,y\in X with y\u2aafx;

(ii)
there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff{x}_{0};

(iii)
f is continuous.
Then f has a fixed point {x}^{\ast}\in X.
Pǎcurar [10] introduced the PrešićKannan type contraction and proved some common fixed point theorems for such contractions. Very recently, in [18] (see also [33]) authors introduced the ordered Prešić type contraction and generalized the result of Prešić and proved some fixed point theorems for such mappings. In this paper, we introduce the ordered PrešićReich type contraction and prove some common fixed point theorems for such type of mappings in ordered metric spaces. Our results generalize and extend the results of Prešić [4, 5], Pǎcurar [10], Malhotra et al. [18], Luong and Thuan [33], Nieto and López [21] and several known results of metric spaces. An example, which illustrates the case when new results can be applied while old ones cannot, is included.
The following definitions will be needed in the sequel.
Definition 1.3 Let X be a nonempty set, k be a positive integer and f:{X}^{k}\to X be a mapping. If f(x,x,\dots ,x)=x, then x\in X is called a fixed point of f.
Definition 1.4 (see [13])
Let X be a nonempty set, k be a positive integer, f:{X}^{k}\to X and g:X\to X be mappings.

(a)
An element x\in X is said to be a coincidence point of f and g if gx=f(x,\dots ,x).

(b)
If w=gx=f(x,\dots ,x), then w is called a point of coincidence of f and g.

(c)
If x=gx=f(x,\dots ,x), then x is called a common fixed point of f and g.

(d)
Mappings f and g are said to be commuting if g(f(x,\dots ,x))=f(gx,\dots ,gx) for all x\in X.

(e)
Mappings f and g are said to be weakly compatible if they commute at their coincidence points.
Remark that the above definition in the case k=1 reduces to the usual definitions of commuting and weakly compatible mappings in the sense of [34] (for details, see the Introduction from [34]).
Definition 1.5 (see [18])
Let a nonempty set X be equipped with a partial order ‘⪯’ such that (X,d) is a metric space, then (X,\u2aaf,d) is called an ordered metric space. A sequence \{{x}_{n}\} in X is said to be nondecreasing with respect to ‘⪯’ if {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aaf{x}_{n}\u2aaf\cdots . Let k be a positive integer and f:{X}^{k}\to X be a mapping, then f is said to be nondecreasing with respect to ‘⪯’ if for any finite nondecreasing sequence {\{{x}_{n}\}}_{n=1}^{k+1} we have f({x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k})\u2aaff({x}_{2},{x}_{3},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}). Let g:X\to X be a mapping. f is said to be gnondecreasing with respect to ‘⪯’ if for any finite nondecreasing sequence {\{g{x}_{n}\}}_{n=1}^{k+1} we have f({x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k})\u2aaff({x}_{2},{x}_{3},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}).
Remark 1.6 For k=1, the above definitions reduce to usual definitions of fixed point and nondecreasing mapping in a metric space.
Definition 1.7 Let X be a nonempty set equipped with partial order ‘⪯,’ and let g:X\to X be a mapping. A nonempty subset \mathcal{A} of X is said to be well ordered if every two elements of \mathcal{A} are comparable. Elements a,b\in \mathcal{A} are called gcomparable if ga and gb are comparable. \mathcal{A} is called gwell ordered if for all a,b\in \mathcal{A}, a and b are gcomparable, i.e., ga and gb are comparable.
Example 1.8 Let X=\{0,1,2,3\}, ‘⪯’ be a partial order relation on X defined by \u2aaf\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}=\{(0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3),(1,2),(2,3),(1,3)\}. Let \mathcal{A}=\{0,1,3\} and g:X\to X be defined by g0=1, g1=2, g2=3, g3=3. Then it is clear that \mathcal{A} is not well ordered but it is gwell ordered.
Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered metric space. Let k be a positive integer and f:{X}^{k}\to X be a mapping. f is said to be an ordered Prešić type contraction if
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aaf{x}_{k+1}, where {\alpha}_{i} are nonnegative constants such that {\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}<1. If (5) is satisfied for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X, then f is called a Prešić type contraction.
f is said to be an ordered PrešićKannan type contraction (see [10] for details) if f satisfies following condition:
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aaf{x}_{k+1}, where 0\le \beta k(k+1)<1. If (6) is satisfied for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X, then f is called a PrešićKannan type contraction.
f is said to be an ordered PrešićReich type contraction (see also [16]) if f satisfies the following condition:
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aaf{x}_{k+1}, where {\alpha}_{i}, {\beta}_{i} are nonnegative constants such that {\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}+k{\sum}_{i=1}^{k+1}{\beta}_{i}<1. If (7) is satisfied for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X, then f is called a PrešićReich type contraction.
Note that the PrešićReich type contraction is a generalization of Prešić type and PrešićKannan type contractions. Indeed, for {\beta}_{i}=0, 1\le i\le k+1, a PrešićReich type contraction reduces into a Prešić type contraction and for {\alpha}_{i}=0, 1\le i\le k, and {\beta}_{i}=\beta, 1\le i\le k+1, a PrešićReich type contraction reduces into a PrešićKannan type contraction. Also, for k=1, a PrešićReich type contraction reduces into a Reich contraction, so it generalizes the Banach and Kannan contractions.
Now we can state our main results.
2 Main results
Theorem 2.1 Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered complete metric space. Let k be a positive integer, f:{X}^{k}\to X and g:X\to X be two mappings such that f({X}^{k})\subset g(X), g(X) is a closed subset of X and
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with g{x}_{1}\u2aafg{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aafg{x}_{k+1}, where {\alpha}_{i}, {\beta}_{i} are nonnegative constants such that
Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(I)
there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that g{x}_{0}\u2aaff({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0});

(II)
f is gnondecreasing;

(III)
if a nondecreasing sequence \{g{x}_{n}\} converges to gu\in X, then g{x}_{n}\u2aafgu for all n\in \mathbb{N} and gu\u2aafggu.
Then f and g have a point of coincidence. If, in addition, f and g are weakly compatible, then f and g have a common fixed point v\in X. Moreover, the set of common fixed points of f and g is gwell ordered if and only if f and g have a unique common fixed point.
Proof Starting with given {x}_{0}\in X, we define a sequence \{{y}_{n}\} as follows: let {y}_{0}=g{x}_{0}, {y}_{1}=f({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0}). As f({X}^{k})\subset g(X), there exists {x}_{1}\in X such that f({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0})=g{x}_{1}. Therefore {y}_{1}=g{x}_{1}=f({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0}) as g{x}_{0}\u2aaff({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0}), we have g{x}_{0}\u2aafg{x}_{1}, that is, {y}_{0}\u2aaf{y}_{1}. Again, as f is gnondecreasing and g{x}_{0}\u2aafg{x}_{1}, we have f({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0})\u2aaff({x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0},{x}_{1})\u2aaff({x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0},{x}_{1},{x}_{1})\u2aaf\cdots \u2aaff({x}_{1},{x}_{1},\dots ,{x}_{1}). Choose {x}_{2}\in X such that {y}_{2}=g{x}_{2}=f({x}_{1},{x}_{1},\dots ,{x}_{1}) (which is possible since f({X}^{k})\subset g(X)). So, g{x}_{0}\u2aafg{x}_{1}\u2aafg{x}_{2}, that is, {y}_{0}\u2aaf{y}_{1}\u2aaf{y}_{2}. Continuing this process, we obtain
that is,
and {y}_{n}=g{x}_{n}=f({x}_{n1},{x}_{n1},\dots ,{x}_{n1}) for n=1,2,\dots . Thus, \{{y}_{n}\}=\{g{x}_{n}\} is nondecreasing with respect to ‘⪯,’ that is, \{{x}_{n}\} is gnondecreasing with respect to ‘⪯.’ We shall show that \{{y}_{n}\}=\{g{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence in g(X). If {y}_{n}={y}_{n+1} for any n, then
As g{x}_{n}\u2aafg{x}_{n+1}, using (8), the above inequality implies that
that is,
since {y}_{n}={y}_{n+1}. In view of (9), we have k{\beta}_{k+1}+(k1){\beta}_{k}+\cdots +{\beta}_{2}={\sum}_{i=2}^{k+1}(i1){\beta}_{i}\le k{\sum}_{i=2}^{k+1}{\beta}_{i}<1, therefore it follows from the above inequality that d({y}_{n+1},{y}_{n+2})=0, that is, {y}_{n+1}={y}_{n+2}. Similarly, it can be shown that
Therefore \{{y}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence. If {y}_{n}\ne {y}_{n+1} for all n, then for any n\ge 0, we have
As \{{x}_{n}\} is gnondecreasing, using (8), the above inequality implies that
that is,
Setting {d}_{n}=d({y}_{n},{y}_{n+1}), we obtain
Let A={\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}, B=k{\sum}_{i=1}^{k+1}{\beta}_{i}, C={\sum}_{i=1}^{k+1}(i1){\beta}_{i}, then in view of (9) we have A+B<1. Therefore
By repeating this process, we obtain
Let m,n\in \mathbb{N} and m>n, then it follows from (10) that
As \lambda <1, we have \frac{{\lambda}^{n}}{1\lambda}{d}_{0}\to 0 as n\to \mathrm{\infty}. Therefore, it follows from the above inequality that {lim}_{n,m\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({y}_{n},{y}_{m})=0. Therefore \{{y}_{n}\}=\{g{x}_{n}\} is a Cauchy sequence. As g(X) is closed, there exist v\in g(X), u\in X such that
We shall show that v is a point of coincidence of f and g. For any n\in \mathbb{N}, we obtain
By (III) we have g{x}_{n}\u2aafgu for all n\in \mathbb{N}, also, as {y}_{n}=g{x}_{n}=f({x}_{n},\dots ,{x}_{n}), {d}_{n}=d(g{x}_{n},g{x}_{n+1}) and gu=v. Therefore, using (8) in the above inequality, we obtain
that is,
As {lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty}}d({y}_{n},v)=0 and 1C=1{\sum}_{i=1}^{k+1}(i1){\beta}_{i}>0, therefore it follows from the above inequality that
Thus, u is a coincidence point and v is a corresponding point of coincidence of f and g. Suppose, f and g are weakly compatible, then by (11) we have
Again, by (III), gu\u2aafggu=gv; therefore using (8) and a similar process as several times before, we obtain
As A={\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}<1, we obtain
Thus v is a common fixed point of f and g. Suppose that the set of common fixed points is gwell ordered. We shall show that the common fixed point is unique. Assume on the contrary that {v}_{0} is another common fixed point of f and g, that is, {v}_{0}=f({v}_{0},\dots ,{v}_{0})=g{v}_{0} and v\ne {v}_{0}. As v and {v}_{0} are gcomparable, let for example gv\u2aafg{v}_{0}. From (8), it follows that
As A={\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}<1, we obtain d(v,{v}_{0})=0, that is, v={v}_{0}, a contradiction. Therefore the common fixed point is unique. For converse, if a common fixed point of f and g is unique, then the set of common fixed points of f and g is singleton, and thus gwell ordered. □
Remark 2.2 Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered metric space, and let f,g:X\to X be two mappings. Then f is called an ordered gweak contraction if
for all x,y\in X with x\u2aafy, where {\alpha}_{1}, {\alpha}_{2}, {\alpha}_{3} are nonnegative constants such that {\alpha}_{1}+{\alpha}_{2}+{\alpha}_{3}<1. If the above inequality is satisfied for all x,y\in X, then f is called a gweak contraction (see [35]). For k=1 in Theorem 2.1, we get a fixed point result for an ordered gweak contraction in metric spaces.
The following is a fixed point result for ordered PrešićReich type mappings in metric spaces and can be obtained by taking g={I}_{X} (that is, the identity mapping of X) in Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.3 Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered complete metric space. Let k be a positive integer, f:{X}^{k}\to X be a mapping such that the following conditions hold:

(I)
f is an ordered PrešićReich type contraction;

(II)
there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that {x}_{0}\u2aaff({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0});

(III)
f is nondecreasing (with respect to ‘⪯’);

(IV)
if a nondecreasing sequence \{{x}_{n}\} converges to u\in X, then {x}_{n}\u2aafu for all n\in \mathbb{N}.
Then f has a fixed point. Moreover, the set of fixed points of f is well ordered if and only if f has a unique fixed point.
The following corollary is a generalization of the result of Prešić in an ordered metric space and can be obtained by taking {\beta}_{i}=0 for 1\le i\le k+1 in Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.4 Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered complete metric space. Let k be a positive integer, f:{X}^{k}\to X and g:X\to X be two mappings such that f({X}^{k})\subset g(x), g(X) is a closed subset of X and
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with g{x}_{1}\u2aafg{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aafg{x}_{k+1}, where {\alpha}_{i} are nonnegative constants such that {\sum}_{i=1}^{k}{\alpha}_{i}<1. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(I)
there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that g{x}_{0}\u2aaff({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0});

(II)
f is gnondecreasing;

(III)
if a nondecreasing sequence \{g{x}_{n}\} converges to gu\in X, then g{x}_{n}\u2aafgu for all n\in \mathbb{N} and gu\u2aafggu.
Then f and g have a point of coincidence. If, in addition, f and g are weakly compatible, then f and g have a common fixed point v\in X. Moreover, the set of common fixed points of f and g is gwell ordered if and only if f and g have a unique common fixed point.
The following corollary generalizes the result of Pǎcurar [10] in ordered metric spaces and can be obtained by taking {\alpha}_{i}=0 for 1\le i\le k in Theorem 2.1.
Corollary 2.5 Let (X,\u2aaf,d) be an ordered complete metric space. Let k be a positive integer, f:{X}^{k}\to X and g:X\to X be two mappings such that f({X}^{k})\subset g(X), g(X) is a closed subset of X and
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},\dots ,{x}_{k+1}\in X with g{x}_{1}\u2aafg{x}_{2}\u2aaf\cdots \u2aafg{x}_{k+1}, where {\beta}_{i} are nonnegative constants such that k{\sum}_{i=1}^{k+1}{\beta}_{i}<1. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(I)
there exists {x}_{0}\in X such that g{x}_{0}\u2aaff({x}_{0},{x}_{0},\dots ,{x}_{0});

(II)
f is gnondecreasing;

(III)
if a nondecreasing sequence \{g{x}_{n}\} converges to gu\in X, then g{x}_{n}\u2aafgu for all n\in \mathbb{N} and gu\u2aafggu.
Then f and g have a point of coincidence. If, in addition, f and g are weakly compatible, then f and g have a common fixed point v\in X. Moreover, the set of common fixed points of f and g is gwell ordered if and only if f and g have a unique common fixed point.
The following example illustrates that an ordered PrešićReich type contraction may not be an ordered Prešić type or ordered PrešićKannan type or PrešićReich type contraction; moreover, that the fixed point of an ordered PrešićReich type contraction may not be unique (when the set of fixed points of f is not wellordered).
Example 2.6 Let X=[0,2] and order relation ‘⪯’ be defined by
and let d be the usual metric on X. Then (X,\u2aaf,d) is an ordered complete metric space. For k=2, define f:{X}^{2}\to X by
Then:

(a)
f is not an ordered Prešić type contraction;

(b)
f is not an ordered PrešićKannan type contraction;

(c)
f is not a PrešićReich type contraction;

(d)
f is an ordered PrešićReich type contraction with {\alpha}_{1}={\alpha}_{2}=\frac{1}{6}, {\beta}_{1}={\beta}_{2}={\beta}_{3}=\frac{1}{10}.
Proof (a) For k=2, (5) becomes
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf{x}_{3}, where {\alpha}_{1}, {\alpha}_{2} are nonnegative constants such that {\alpha}_{1}+{\alpha}_{2}<1. Note that 1\u2aaf1\u2aaf\frac{9}{10}, therefore for {x}_{1}={x}_{2}=1, {x}_{3}=\frac{9}{10}, (14) becomes
But {\alpha}_{1}+{\alpha}_{2}<1 and therefore the above inequality will never hold. Thus f is not an ordered Prešić type contraction.
(b) For k=2, (6) becomes
for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf{x}_{3}, where β is a nonnegative constant such that \beta <\frac{1}{6}. Note that x\u2aaf0\u2aaf0 for all x\in (0,1) and therefore for {x}_{2}={x}_{3}=0, {x}_{1}=x\in (0,1), (15) becomes
But \beta <\frac{1}{6}, and therefore the above inequality will never hold. Thus f is not an ordered PrešićKannan type contraction.

(c)
For k=2, (7) becomes
\begin{array}{rcl}d(f({x}_{1},{x}_{2}),f({x}_{2},{x}_{3}))& \le & {\alpha}_{1}d({x}_{1},{x}_{2})+{\alpha}_{2}d({x}_{2},{x}_{3})\\ +{\beta}_{1}d({x}_{1},f({x}_{1},{x}_{1}))\\ +{\beta}_{2}d({x}_{2},f({x}_{2},{x}_{2}))+{\beta}_{3}d({x}_{3},f({x}_{3},{x}_{3})),\end{array}(16)
where {\alpha}_{1}, {\alpha}_{2}, {\beta}_{1}, {\beta}_{2}, {\beta}_{3} are nonnegative constants such that {\sum}_{i=1}^{2}{\alpha}_{i}+2{\sum}_{i=1}^{3}{\beta}_{i}<1. If f is a PrešićReich type contraction, then inequality (16) must be satisfied for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in X. Note that for {x}_{1}={x}_{2}=2, {x}_{3}=0, (16) becomes
But {\sum}_{i=1}^{2}{\alpha}_{i}+2{\sum}_{i=1}^{3}{\beta}_{i}<1, and therefore the above inequality will never hold. Thus f is not a PrešićReich type contraction.
(d) If f is an ordered PrešićReich type contraction, then inequality (16) must be satisfied for all {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in X with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf{x}_{3}. Indeed, we have to check the validity of (16) only for {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in [0,1], {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in (1,2) and {x}_{1}={x}_{2}={x}_{3}=2. If {x}_{1}={x}_{2}={x}_{3}=1 or {x}_{1}={x}_{2}={x}_{3}=2, then (16) is satisfied trivially. If {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in [0,1) or {x}_{1},{x}_{2},{x}_{3}\in (1,2) with {x}_{1}\u2aaf{x}_{2}\u2aaf{x}_{3}, that is, {x}_{3}\le {x}_{2}\le {x}_{1}, then (16) becomes
which is valid for {\alpha}_{1}={\alpha}_{2}=\frac{1}{6}, {\beta}_{1}={\beta}_{2}={\beta}_{3}=\frac{1}{10}. If any one of {x}_{1}, {x}_{2}, {x}_{3} is equal to 1, then with a similar process one can verify the same result. If any two of {x}_{1}, {x}_{2}, {x}_{3} are equal to 1, for example, let {x}_{1}={x}_{2}=1, {x}_{3}\in [0,1), then (16) becomes
which is valid for {\alpha}_{1}={\alpha}_{2}=\frac{1}{6}, {\beta}_{1}={\beta}_{2}={\beta}_{3}=\frac{1}{10}. Similarly, in all possible cases, (16) is satisfied for {\alpha}_{1}={\alpha}_{2}=\frac{1}{6}, {\beta}_{1}={\beta}_{2}={\beta}_{3}=\frac{1}{10}. Thus, f is an ordered PrešićReich type contraction. All the conditions of Corollary 2.3 (except the set of fixed points of f is well ordered) are satisfied and the set of fixed points of f is \mathcal{F}=\{0,2\}. Note that the set of fixed points of f, that is ℱ, is not well ordered (as (0,2),(2,0)\notin \phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\u2aaf) and fixed point f is not unique. □
References
Kannan R: Some results on fixed points. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 1968, 60: 71–76.
Kannan R: Some results on fixed points. II. Am. Math. Mon. 1969, 76: 405–408. 10.2307/2316437
Reich S: Some remarks concerning contraction mappings. Can. Math. Bull. 1971, 14: 121–124. 10.4153/CMB19710249
Prešić S: Sur la convergence des suites. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 1965, 260: 3828–3830.
Prešić S: Sur une classe d’inéquations aux différences finite et sur la convergence de certaines suites. Publ. Inst. Math. (Belgr.) 1965, 5(19):75–78.
Shukla S, Radenović S: A generalization of Prešić type mappings in 0complete ordered partial metric spaces. Chin. J. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 859531 10.1155/2013/859531
Shukla S: Prešić type results in 2Banach spaces. Afr. Math. 2013. 10.1007/s1337001301742
Ćirić LB, Prešić S: On Prešić type generalisation of Banach contraction principle. Acta Math. Univ. Comen. 2007, LXXVI(2):143–147.
Pǎcurar M: A multistep iterative method for approximating common fixed points of PrešićRus type operators on metric spaces. Stud. Univ. BabeşBolyai, Math. 2010, LV(1):416–420.
Pǎcurar M: Approximating common fixed points of PrešićKannan type operators by a multistep iterative method. An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa 2009, 17(1):153–168.
Pǎcurar M: Common fixed points for almost Prešić type operators. Carpath. J. Math. 2012, 28(1):117–126.
Khan M, Berzig M, Samet B: Some convergence results for iterative sequences of Prešić type and applications. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012. 10.1186/16871847201238
George R, Reshma K, Rajagopalan R: A generalised fixed point theorem of Prešić type in cone metric spaces and application to Markov process. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011. 10.1186/16871812201185
Shukla S, Fisher B: A generalization of Prešić type mappings in metriclike spaces. J. Oper. 2013., 2013: Article ID 368501 10.1155/2013/368501
Shukla, S, Sen, R, Radenović, S: Setvalued Prešić type contraction in metric spaces. An. Ştiinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iaşi. Mat. (in press)
Shukla S, Sen R: Setvalued PrešićReich type mappings in metric spaces. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat., Ser. A Mat. 2012. 10.1007/s1339801201142
Shukla S, Radenović S, Pantelić S: Some fixed point theorems for PrešićHardyRogers type contractions in metric spaces. J. Math. 2013., 2013: Article ID 295093 10.1155/2013/295093
Malhotra S, Shukla S, Sen R: A generalization of Banach contraction principle in ordered cone metric spaces. J. Adv. Math. Stud. 2012, 5(2):59–67.
Chen Y: A Prešić type contractive condition and its applications. Nonlinear Anal. 2009. 10.1016/j.na.2009.03.006
Ran ACM, Reurings MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some application to matrix equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 132: 1435–1443. 10.1090/S0002993903072204
Nieto J, Lopez R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order 2005, 22: 223–239. 10.1007/s1108300590185
Nieto J, Lopez R: Existence and uniqueness of fixed point in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2007, 23(12):2205–2212. 10.1007/s1011400507690
Paesano D, Vetro P: Suzuki’s type characterizations of completeness for partial metric spaces and fixed points for partially ordered metric spaces. Topol. Appl. 2012, 159: 911–920. 10.1016/j.topol.2011.12.008
Vetro F, Radenović S: Nonlinear ψ quasicontractions of Ćirićtype in partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Anal. Optim., Theory Appl. 2012, 219: 1594–1600.
Aydi H: Fixed point results for weakly contractive mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. J. Adv. Math. Stud. 2011, 4(2):1–12.
Aydi H: Fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in ordered partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Anal. Optim., Theory Appl. 2011, 2(2):33–48.
Aydi H: Some coupled fixed point results on partial metric spaces. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2011., 2011: Article ID 647091
Aydi H: Some fixed point results in ordered partial metric spaces. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 2011, 4(3):210–217.
Nashine H, Kadelburg Z, Radenović S, Kim J: Fixed point theorems under HardyRogers contractive conditions on 0complete ordered partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012., 2012: Article ID 180
Altun I, Erduran A: Fixed point theorems for monotone mappings on partial metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 508730
Radenović S, Kadelburg Z: Generalized weak contractions in partially ordered metric spaces. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 60: 1776–1783. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.07.008
Shatanawi W, Samet B, Abbas M: Coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone mappings in ordered partial metric spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 55: 680–687. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.042
Luong N, Thuan N: Some fixed point theorems of PrešićĆirić type. Acta Univ. Apulensis 2012, 30: 237–249.
Abbas M, Jungck J: Common fixed point results for noncommuting mappings without continuity in cone metric spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 341: 416–420. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.09.070
Vetro P: Common fixed points in cone metric spaces. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 2007, 56(2):464–468.
Acknowledgements
This paper is supported by Grant No. 1740024 from the Ministry of Science and Technical Development of the Republic of Serbia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
All authors of the present paper disclose no actual potential conflict of interests including any financial, personal or other relationships with people or organizations.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Shukla, S., Radojević, S., Veljković, Z.A. et al. Some coincidence and common fixed point theorems for ordered PrešićReich type contractions. J Inequal Appl 2013, 520 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2013520
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2013520