Open Access

Fourth order elliptic boundary value problem with nonlinear term decaying at the origin

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20132013:432

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-432

Received: 24 April 2013

Accepted: 31 July 2013

Published: 13 September 2013

Abstract

We consider the number of the weak solutions for some fourth order elliptic boundary value problem with bounded nonlinear term decaying at the origin. We get a theorem, which shows the existence of the bounded solution for this problem. We obtain this result by approaching the variational method and using the generalized mountain pass theorem for the fourth order elliptic problem with bounded nonlinear term.

MSC:35J30, 35J40.

Keywords

fourth order elliptic boundary value problemnonlinear term decaying at the originbounded nonlinear termvariational methodgeneralized mountain pass theorem ( PS ) c condition

1 Introduction

Let Ω be a bounded domain in R n with smooth boundary Ω. Let c R 1 and g : Ω ¯ × R R be a C 1 function. In this paper, we consider the number of the weak solutions for the following fourth order elliptic problem with the Dirichlet boundary condition
Δ 2 u + c Δ u = g ( x , u ( x ) ) in  Ω , u = 0 , Δ u = 0 on  Ω .
(1.1)

We assume that g C 1 ( Ω ¯ × R , R ) satisfies the following:

(g1) g C 1 ( Ω ¯ × R , R ) ,

(g2) g ( x , 0 ) = 0 , g ( x , ξ ) = o ( | ξ | ) uniformly with respect to x Ω ¯ ,

(g3) there exists C > 0 such that | g ( x , ξ ) | < C ( x , ξ ) Ω ¯ × R .

The eigenvalue problem
Δ u + λ u = 0 in  Ω , u = 0 on  Ω
has infinitely many eigenvalues λ j , j 1 , which is repeated as often as its multiplicity, and the corresponding eigenfunctions ϕ j , j 1 suitably normalized with respect to L 2 ( Ω ) inner product. The eigenvalue problem
Δ 2 u + c Δ u = Λ u in  Ω , u = 0 , Δ u = 0 on  Ω ,
has also infinitely many eigenvalues Λ j = λ j ( λ j c ) , j 1 and corresponding eigenfunctions ϕ j , j 1 . We note that
Λ 1 < Λ 2 Λ 3 , Λ j + .

Furthermore, we assume that c R 1 satisfies λ j < c < λ j + 1 .

Jung and Choi [1] proved that (1.1) has at least one nontrivial solution, when c < λ 1 and g satisfies the condition (g1), (g2) and additional conditions

(g3)′ there exists ξ 0 such that p ( x , ξ ) 0 x Ω ¯ ,

(g4)′ there exist a constant r > 0 and an element e H such that e = r , e < ξ and 1 2 r 2 Ω P ( x , e ) < 0 ,

by reducing problem (1.1) to the problem with bounded nonlinear term and then applying the maximum principle for the elliptic operator −Δ and Δ c two times and the mountain pass theorem in the critical point theory. Jung and Choi [2] showed the existence of at least two solutions, one of which is a bounded solution and a large norm solution of (1.1), when g ( u ) is polynomial growth or exponential growth nonlinear term. The authors proved these results by the variational method and the mountain pass theorem. For the constant coefficient semilinear case Choi and Jung [3] showed that the problem
Δ 2 u + c Δ u = b u + + s in  Ω , u = 0 , Δ u = 0 on  Ω ,
(1.2)
has at least two nontrivial solutions, when c < λ 1 , Λ 1 < b < Λ 2 and s < 0 or when λ 1 < c < λ 2 , b < Λ 1 and s > 0 . The authors obtained these results by using the variational reduction method. The authors [4] also proved that when c < λ 1 , Λ 1 < b < Λ 2 and s < 0 , (1.2) has at least three nontrivial solutions by using the degree theory. Tarantello [5] also studied the problem
Δ 2 u + c Δ u = b ( ( u + 1 ) + 1 ) in  Ω , u = 0 , Δ u = 0 on  Ω .
(1.3)

She showed that if c < λ 1 and b Λ 1 , then (1.3) has a negative solution. She obtained this result by the degree theory. Micheletti and Pistoia [6] also proved that if c < λ 1 and b Λ 2 , then (1.3) has at least three solutions by the variational linking theorem and Leray-Schauder degree theory.

In this paper, we are trying to find weak solutions of (1.1), that is,
Ω [ Δ 2 u v + c Δ u v g ( x , u ) v ] d x = 0 , v H ,

where H is introduced in Section 2.

We consider the associated functional of (1.1)
I ( u ) = Ω [ 1 2 | Δ u | 2 c 2 | u | 2 G ( x , u ) ] d x ,
(1.4)

where G ( x , s ) = 0 s g ( x , τ ) d τ . By (g1), I is well defined.

Our main result is the following.

Theorem 1.1Assume that λ j < c < λ j + 1 , j 1 , andgsatisfies the conditions (g1)-(g3). Then (1.1) has at least one bounded weak solution.

We prove Theorem 1.1 by approaching the variational method and using the mountain pass theorem for the reduced fourth order elliptic problem with bounded nonlinear term. The outline of the proof of Theorem 1.1 is as follows: In Section 2, we prove that functional I ( u ) C 1 and the functional I satisfies the Palais-Smale condition. In Section 3, we show that the functional I satisfies the generalized mountain pass theorem, and so, prove that I has at least one nontrival critical point, from which we prove Theorem 1.1.

2 Variational approach

Let L 2 ( Ω ) be a square integrable function space defined on Ω. Any element u in L 2 ( Ω ) can be written as
u = h k ϕ k with  h k 2 < .
We define a subspace H of L 2 ( Ω ) as follows
H = { u L 2 ( Ω ) | | Λ k | h k 2 < } .
(2.1)
Then this is a complete normed space with a norm
u = [ | Λ k | h k 2 ] 1 2 .
Since λ k + and c is fixed, we have Λ k and
  1. (i)

    Δ 2 u + c Δ u H implies u H ,

     
  2. (ii)

    u C u L 2 ( Ω ) for some C > 0 ,

     
  3. (iii)

    u L 2 ( Ω ) = 0 if and only if u = 0 ,

     

which is proved in [7].

Let
H + = { u H h k = 0  if  Λ k < 0 } , H = { u H h k = 0  if  Λ k > 0 } .

Then H = H H + , for u H , u = u + u + H H + . Let P + be the orthogonal projection from H onto H + and P be the orthogonal projection from H onto H . We can write P + u = u + , P u = u , for u H .

By the following Lemma 2.1, the weak solutions of (1.1) coincide with the critical points of the associated functional I ( u ) .

Lemma 2.1Assume that λ j < c < λ j + 1 , j 1 , andgsatisfies the conditions (g1)-(g3). Then I ( u ) is continuous, and Fréchet differentiable inHwith Fréchet derivative
I ( u ) h = Ω [ Δ u Δ h c u h g ( x , u ) h ] d x .
If we set
F ( u ) = 1 2 Ω G ( x , u ) d x ,
then F ( u ) is continuous with respect to weak convergence, F ( u ) is compact and
F ( u ) h = Ω g ( x , u ) h d x for all h H ,

this implies that I C 1 ( H , R ) and F ( u ) is weakly continuous.

The proof of Lemma 2.1 has the similar process to that of the proof in Appendix B in [8].

Now, we shall show that I ( u ) satisfies the Palais-Smale condition.

Lemma 2.2Assume that λ j < c < λ j + 1 , j 1 , andgsatisfies the conditions (g1)-(g3). Then the functionalIsatisfies the Palais-Smale condition: Any sequence ( u m ) inH, for which | I ( u m ) | M and I ( u m ) 0 as m , possesses a convergent subsequence.

Proof Let us choose u H . By g C 1 and (g1), G ( x , u ) is bounded. Then we have
I ( u ) = Ω [ 1 2 | Δ u | 2 c 2 | u | 2 G ( x , u ) ] d x 1 2 { λ 1 ( λ 1 c ) } u L 2 ( Ω ) 2 Ω G ( x , u ) d x .

Since u is bounded and Ω G ( x , u ) d x is bounded, I ( u ) is bounded from below. Thus, I satisfies the ( PS ) condition. □

3 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Now, we recall the generalized mountain pass theorem (cf. Theorem 5.3 in [8]).

Let
B r = { u H u r } , B r = { u H u = r } .

Theorem 3.1 (Generalized mountain pass theorem)

LetHbe a real Banach space with H = V X , where V { 0 } and is finite-dimensional. Suppose that I C 1 ( H , R ) satisfies ( PS ) condition, and
  1. (i)

    there are constants ρ , α > 0 and a bounded neighborhood B ρ of 0 such that I | B ρ X α , and

     
  2. (ii)

    there is an e B 1 X and R > ρ such that if Q = ( B ¯ R V ) { r e 0 < r < R } , then I | Q 0 .

     
ThenIpossesses a critical value b α . Moreover, bcan be characterized as
b = inf γ Γ max u Q I ( γ ( u ) ) ,
where
Γ = { γ C ( Q ¯ , H ) γ = id on Q } .

We shall show that the functionalIsatisfies the generalized mountain pass geometrical assumptions.

Let H j = span { ϕ 1 , , ϕ j } . Then H j is a subspace ofHsuch that
H = j N H j and H = H j H j .
Let
Q = ( B ¯ R H j ) { r e e B 1 H j , 0 < r < R } .
Lemma 3.1Assume that λ j < c < λ j + 1 andgsatisfies (g1)-(g3). Then
  1. (i)

    there are constants ρ > 0 , α > 0 and a bounded neighborhood B ρ of 0 such that I | B ρ H j α , and

     
  2. (ii)

    there is an e B 1 H j and R > ρ such that if Q = ( B ¯ R H j ) { r e 0 < r < R } , then I | Q 0 , and

     
  3. (iii)

    there exists u 0 H Q such that u 0 > R and I ( u 0 ) 0 .

     
Proof (i) Let u H j . We note that
if  u H j , Ω ( Δ 2 u + c Δ u ) u d x λ j + 1 ( λ j + 1 c ) u L 2 ( Ω ) 2 > 0 .
Since G ( x , u ( x ) ) is bounded, there exists a constant C > 0 such that C G ( x , u ( x ) ) C . Thus, we have
I ( u ) = 1 2 P + u 2 1 2 P u 2 Ω G ( x , u ) 1 2 P + u 2 C
for C > 0 . There exist ρ > o and α > o such that if u B ρ H j , then I ( u ) α .
  1. (ii)
    Let us choose an element e B 1 H j . Let u ( B r ¯ H j ) { r e 0 < r } . Then u = v + w , v B r H j , w = r e . We note that
    if  v B r H j , Ω ( Δ 2 v + c Δ v ) v d x λ j ( λ j c ) v L 2 ( Ω ) 2 < 0 .
     
Thus, we have
I ( u ) = 1 2 r 2 1 2 v 2 Ω G ( x , v + r e ) 1 2 r 2 + 1 2 ( λ j ( λ j c ) ) v L 2 ( Ω ) 2 + C
for C > 0 . Then there exists R > 0 such that if u Q = ( B ¯ R H j ) { r e 0 < r < R } , then I ( u ) | Q 0 , from which we can choose an element u 0 H B R such that I ( u 0 ) 0 .
  1. (iii)

    If we choose u 0 H Q , then by (ii), I ( u 0 ) 0 . □

     
Proof of Theorem 1.1 We will show that I ( u ) has a nontrivial critical point by the generalized mountain pass theorem. By Lemma 2.1, I ( u ) is continuous and Fréchet differentiable in H. By Lemma 2.2, the functional I satisfies ( PS ) condition. We note that I ( 0 ) = 0 . By Lemma 3.1, there are constants ρ > 0 , α > 0 and a bounded neighborhood B ρ of 0 such that I | B ρ H j α , and there is an e B 1 H j and R > ρ such that if Q = ( B ¯ R H j ) { r e 0 < r < R } . Let us set
Γ = { γ C ( Q ¯ , H ) γ = id  on  Q } .
By the generalized mountain pass theorem, I possesses a critical value b α . Moreover, b can be characterized as
b = inf γ Γ max u Q I ( γ ( u ) ) .
Thus, we prove that I has at least one nontrivial critical point. We denote by u ˜ a critical point of I such that I ( u ˜ ) = b . We claim that b is bounded. In fact, by (iii) of Lemma 3.1, we have
b max 0 t 1 I ( t u 0 ) ,
and by (g3),
I ( t u 0 ) = t 2 ( 1 2 P + u 0 2 1 2 P u 0 2 ) Ω G ( x , t u 0 ) d x t 2 u 0 2 Ω G ( x , t u 0 ) d x t 2 u 0 2 + C 1 = C 2 t 2 + C 2
for some constant C 2 > 0 . Since 0 t 1 , b is bounded:
b < C ˜ .
(3.1)
We claim that u ˜ is bounded. In fact, by contradiction, Δ 2 u ˜ + c Δ u ˜ = g ( x , u ˜ ) and for any K > 0 , max Ω | u ˜ ( x ) | > K imply that
b = I ( u ˜ ) = 1 2 ( P + u ˜ 2 P u ˜ 2 ) Ω G ( x , u ˜ ) d x

is not bounded, which is absurd to the fact that b = I ( u ˜ ) is bounded. Thus, u ˜ is bounded, so (1.1) has at least one bounded weak solution. Thus, we prove Theorem 1.1. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work (Tacksun Jung) was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (KRF-2010-0023985).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Kunsan National University
(2)
Department of Mathematics Education, Inha University

References

  1. Jung TS, Choi QH: Nontrivial solution for the biharmonic boundary value problem with some nonlinear term. Korean J. Math. 2013, 21(2):117–124. 10.11568/kjm.2013.21.2.117View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jung TS, Choi QH: Nonlinear biharmonic problem with variable coefficient exponential growth term. Korean J. Math. 2010, 18(3):1–12.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Choi QH, Jung T: Multiplicity results on nonlinear biharmonic operator. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 1999, 29(1):141–164. 10.1216/rmjm/1181071683MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Jung TS, Choi QH: Multiplicity results on a nonlinear biharmonic equation. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 1997, 30(8):5083–5092. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00381-7MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Tarantello G: A note on a semilinear elliptic problem. Differ. Integral Equ. 1992, 5(3):561–565.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Micheletti AM, Pistoia A: Multiplicity results for a fourth-order semilinear elliptic problem. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 1998, 31(7):895–908. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00446-XMathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi QH, Jung T: Multiplicity of solutions and source terms in a fourth order nonlinear elliptic equation. Acta Math. Sci. 1999, 19(4):361–374.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Rabinowitz PH CBMS. Regional Conf. Ser. Math. 65. In Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to Differential Equations. Am. Math. Soc., Providence; 1986.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jung and Choi; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.