Skip to content
• Research
• Open Access

# Common solutions of equilibrium and fixed point problems

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20132013:425

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-425

• Received: 22 July 2013
• Accepted: 22 August 2013
• Published:

## Abstract

In this paper, common solutions of equilibrium and fixed point problems are investigated. Convergence theorems of common solutions are established in a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space.

MSC:47H09, 47H10, 47J25.

## Keywords

• asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping
• generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping
• generalized projection
• equilibrium problem
• fixed point

## 1 Introduction and preliminaries

Let E be a real Banach space. Let ${U}_{E}=\left\{x\in E:\parallel x\parallel =1\right\}$ be the unit sphere of E. E is said to be smooth iff ${lim}_{t\to 0}\frac{\parallel x+ty\parallel -\parallel x\parallel }{t}$ exists for each $x,y\in {U}_{E}$. It is also said to be uniformly smooth iff the above limit is attained uniformly for $x,y\in {U}_{E}$. E is said to be strictly convex iff $\parallel \frac{x+y}{2}\parallel <1$ for all $x,y\in E$ with $\parallel x\parallel =\parallel y\parallel =1$ and $x\ne y$. It is said to be uniformly convex iff ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel {x}_{n}-{y}_{n}\parallel =0$ for any two sequences $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ and $\left\{{y}_{n}\right\}$ in E such that $\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel =\parallel {y}_{n}\parallel =1$ and ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel \frac{{x}_{n}+{y}_{n}}{2}\parallel =1$.

Recall that the normalized duality mapping J from E to ${2}^{{E}^{\ast }}$ is defined by
$Jx=\left\{{f}^{\ast }\in {E}^{\ast }:〈x,{f}^{\ast }〉={\parallel x\parallel }^{2}={\parallel {f}^{\ast }\parallel }^{2}\right\},$

where $〈\cdot ,\cdot 〉$ denotes the generalized duality pairing. It is well known that if E is uniformly smooth, then J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on each bounded subset of E. It is also well known that E is (uniformly) smooth if and only if ${E}^{\ast }$ is (uniformly) convex.

In what follows, we use and → to stand for the weak and strong convergence, respectively. Recall that E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property iff for any sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}\subset E$, and $x\in E$ with ${x}_{n}⇀x$, and $\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel \to \parallel x\parallel$, then $\parallel {x}_{n}-x\parallel \to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. It is well known that if E is a uniformly convex Banach space, then E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property.

Let E be a smooth Banach space. Consider the functional defined by
$\varphi \left(x,y\right)={\parallel x\parallel }^{2}-2〈x,Jy〉+{\parallel y\parallel }^{2}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x,y\in E.$
Observe that, in a Hilbert space H, the equality is reduced to $\varphi \left(x,y\right)={\parallel x-y\parallel }^{2}$, $x,y\in H$. As we all know, if C is a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H and ${P}_{C}:H\to C$ is the metric projection of H onto C, then ${P}_{C}$ is nonexpansive. This fact actually characterizes Hilbert spaces and, consequently, it is not available in more general Banach spaces. In this connection, Alber  recently introduced a generalized projection operator ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}$ in a Banach space E, which is an analogue of the metric projection ${P}_{C}$ in Hilbert spaces. Recall that the generalized projection ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}:E\to C$ is a map that assigns to an arbitrary point $x\in E$ the minimum point of the functional $\varphi \left(x,y\right)$, that is, ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}x=\overline{x}$, where $\overline{x}$ is the solution to the minimization problem $\varphi \left(\overline{x},x\right)={min}_{y\in C}\varphi \left(y,x\right)$. Existence and uniqueness of the operator ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}$ follows from the properties of the functional $\varphi \left(x,y\right)$ and strict monotonicity of the mapping J. If E is a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space, then $\varphi \left(x,y\right)=0$ if and only if $x=y$; for more details, see  and the references therein. In Hilbert spaces, ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}={P}_{C}$. It is obvious from the definition of a function ϕ that
$\varphi \left(x,y\right)=\varphi \left(x,z\right)+\varphi \left(z,y\right)+2〈x-z,Jz-Jy〉,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x,y,z\in E,$
(1.1)
and
${\left(\parallel x\parallel -\parallel y\parallel \right)}^{2}\le \varphi \left(x,y\right)\le {\left(\parallel y\parallel +\parallel x\parallel \right)}^{2},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x,y\in E.$
(1.2)
Let C be a nonempty subset of E, and let $T:C\to C$ be a mapping. In this paper, we use $F\left(T\right)$ to stand for the fixed point set of T. T is said to be closed iff for any sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}\subset C$ such that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{x}_{n}={x}_{0}$ and ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}T{x}_{n}={y}_{0}$, then $T{x}_{0}={y}_{0}$. T is said to be asymptotically regular on C iff for any bounded subset K of C,
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim sup}\left\{\parallel {T}^{n+1}x-{T}^{n}x\parallel :x\in K\right\}=0.$
Recall that a point p in C is said to be an asymptotic fixed point of T iff C contains a sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ which converges weakly to p such that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel {x}_{n}-T{x}_{n}\parallel =0$. The set of asymptotic fixed points of T will be denoted by $\stackrel{˜}{F}\left(T\right)$. T is said to be relatively nonexpansive iff
$\stackrel{˜}{F}\left(T\right)=F\left(T\right)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing },\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\varphi \left(p,Tx\right)\le \varphi \left(p,x\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x\in C,\mathrm{\forall }p\in F\left(T\right).$
T is said to be relatively asymptotically nonexpansive iff
$\stackrel{˜}{F}\left(T\right)=F\left(T\right)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing },\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\varphi \left(p,{T}^{n}x\right)\le \left(1+{\mu }_{n}\right)\varphi \left(p,x\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x\in C,\mathrm{\forall }p\in F\left(T\right),\mathrm{\forall }n\ge 1,$

where $\left\{{\mu }_{n}\right\}\subset \left[0,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$ is a sequence such that ${\mu }_{n}\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$.

Remark 1.1 The class of relatively asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which is an extension of the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings was first considered in  and .

Recall that T is said to be quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive iff
$F\left(T\right)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing },\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\varphi \left(p,Tx\right)\le \varphi \left(p,x\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x\in C,\mathrm{\forall }p\in F\left(T\right).$
Recall that T is said to be asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive iff there exists a sequence $\left\{{\mu }_{n}\right\}\subset \left[0,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$ with ${\mu }_{n}\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$ such that
$F\left(T\right)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing },\phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}\varphi \left(p,{T}^{n}x\right)\le \left(1+{\mu }_{n}\right)\varphi \left(p,x\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x\in C,\mathrm{\forall }p\in F\left(T\right),\mathrm{\forall }n\ge 1.$

Remark 1.2 The class of asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings, which is an extension of the class of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings, was considered in [4, 5]; see also .

Remark 1.3 The class of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings are more general than the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings and the class of relatively asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. Quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings and asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings do not require the restriction $F\left(T\right)=\stackrel{˜}{F}\left(T\right)$.

Remark 1.4 The class of quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings are generalizations of the class of quasi-nonexpansive mappings and the class of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces.

Recall that T is said to be generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive iff $F\left(T\right)\ne \mathrm{\varnothing }$, and there exist two nonnegative sequences $\left\{{\mu }_{n}\right\}\subset \left[0,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$ with ${\mu }_{n}\to 0$, and $\left\{{\xi }_{n}\right\}\subset \left[0,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$ with ${\xi }_{n}\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$ such that
$\varphi \left(p,{T}^{n}x\right)\le \left(1+{\mu }_{n}\right)\varphi \left(p,x\right)+{\xi }_{n},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x\in C,\mathrm{\forall }p\in F\left(T\right),\mathrm{\forall }n\ge 1.$

Remark 1.5 The class of generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings  is a generalization of the class of generalized asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in the framework of Banach spaces which was introduced by Agarwal et al. .

Let F be a bifunction from $C×C$ to , where denotes the set of real numbers. Recall the following equilibrium problem. Find $p\in C$ such that $F\left(p,y\right)\ge 0$, $\mathrm{\forall }y\in C$. We use $\mathit{EP}\left(F\right)$ to denote the solution set of the equilibrium problem. Given a mapping $Q:C\to {E}^{\ast }$, let
$F\left(x,y\right)=〈Qx,y-x〉,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }x,y\in C.$
Then $p\in \mathit{EP}\left(F\right)$ if and only if p is a solution of the following variational inequality. Find p such that
$〈Qp,y-p〉\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$
Numerous problems in physics, optimization and economics reduce to finding a solution of the equilibrium problem; see  and the related references therein. In , Kim studied a sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ which is generated in the following manner:

where ${M}_{n}=sup\left\{\varphi \left(z,{x}_{n}\right):z\in \mathcal{F}\right\}$ for each $n\ge 1$, $\left\{{\alpha }_{n}\right\}$ is a real sequence in $\left[0,1\right]$, $\left\{{r}_{n}\right\}$ is a real sequence in $\left[a,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$, where a is some positive real number. In a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space, which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, the author obtained a strong convergence theorem; for more details, see  and the references therein.

In this paper, motivated by the above result, we consider the projection algorithm for treating solutions of the equilibrium problem and fixed points of generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mappings. A strong convergence theorem is established in a Banach space. The results presented this paper mainly improve the corresponding results announced in Qin Cho and Kang  and Kim .

In order to prove our main results, we need the following lemmas.

Lemma 1.6 

Let E be a smooth and uniformly convex Banach space, and let $r>0$. Then there exists a strictly increasing, continuous and convex function $g:\left[0,2r\right]\to R$ such that $g\left(0\right)=0$ and
${\parallel tx+\left(1-t\right)y\parallel }^{2}\le t{\parallel x\parallel }^{2}+\left(1-t\right){\parallel y\parallel }^{2}-t\left(1-t\right)g\left(\parallel x-y\parallel \right)$

for all $x,y\in {B}_{r}=\left\{x\in E:\parallel x\parallel \le r\right\}$ and $t\in \left[0,1\right]$.

Lemma 1.7 

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a smooth Banach space E and $x\in E$. Then ${x}_{0}={\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}x$ if and only if
$〈{x}_{0}-y,Jx-J{x}_{0}〉\ge 0\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$

Lemma 1.8 

Let E be a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space, let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of E and $x\in E$. Then
$\varphi \left(y,{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}x\right)+\varphi \left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}x,x\right)\le \varphi \left(y,x\right)\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$

Lemma 1.9 [5, 22]

Let C be a closed convex subset of a smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space E. Let F be a bifunction from $C×C$ to satisfying (A1)-(A4). Let $r>0$ and $x\in E$. Then there exists $z\in C$ such that $F\left(z,y\right)+\frac{1}{r}〈y-z,Jz-Jx〉\ge 0$, $\mathrm{\forall }y\in C$. Define a mapping ${T}_{r}:E\to C$ by
${S}_{r}x=\left\{z\in C:f\left(z,y\right)+\frac{1}{r}〈y-z,Jz-Jx〉,\mathrm{\forall }y\in C\right\}.$
Then the following conclusions hold:
1. (1)
${S}_{r}$ is a single-valued firmly nonexpansive-type mapping, i.e., for all $x,y\in E$,
$〈{S}_{r}x-{S}_{r}y,J{S}_{r}x-J{S}_{r}y〉\le 〈{S}_{r}x-{S}_{r}y,Jx-Jy〉;$

2. (2)

$F\left({S}_{r}\right)=\mathit{EP}\left(F\right)$ is closed and convex;

3. (3)

${S}_{r}$ is quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive;

4. (4)

$\varphi \left(q,{S}_{r}x\right)+\varphi \left({S}_{r}x,x\right)\le \varphi \left(q,x\right)$, $\mathrm{\forall }q\in F\left({S}_{r}\right)$.

Lemma 1.10 

Let E be a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let $T:C\to C$ be a generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping. Then $F\left(T\right)$ is closed and convex.

## 2 Main results

Theorem 2.1 Let E be a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let Δ be an index set. Let ${F}_{i}$ be a bifunction from $C×C$ to satisfying (A1)-(A4) for every $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$. Let $T:C\to C$ be a generalized asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping. Assume that T is closed asymptotically regular on C and $\mathrm{\Omega }:=F\left(T\right)\cap {\bigcap }_{i\in \mathrm{\Delta }}EF\left({F}_{i}\right)$ is nonempty and bounded. Let $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ be a sequence generated in the following manner:

where ${M}_{n}=sup\left\{\varphi \left(z,{x}_{n}\right):z\in \mathrm{\Omega }\right\}$, $\left\{{\alpha }_{n}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left(0,1\right)$ such that ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)>0$, $\left\{{r}_{n,i}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left[{a}_{i},\mathrm{\infty }\right)$, where $\left\{{a}_{i}\right\}$ is a positive real number sequence. Then the sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ converges strongly to ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$, where ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ is the generalized projection from E onto Ω.

Proof In view of Lemmas 1.9 and 1.10, we find that the common solution set Ω is closed and convex. Next, we show that ${C}_{n}$ is closed and convex. It suffices to show, for any fixed but arbitrary $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$, that ${C}_{n,i}$ is closed and convex. This can be proved by induction on n. It is obvious that ${C}_{1,i}=C$ is closed and convex. Assume that ${C}_{j,i}$ is closed and convex for some $j\ge 1$. We next prove that ${C}_{j+1,i}$ is closed and convex for the same j. This completes the proof that ${C}_{n}$ is closed and convex. It is clear that ${C}_{j+1,i}$ is closed. We only prove the convexity. Indeed, $\mathrm{\forall }a,b\in {C}_{j+1,i}$, we see that $a,b\in {C}_{j,i}$, and
$\varphi \left(a,{u}_{j,i}\right)\le \varphi \left(a,{x}_{j}\right)+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j},$
and
$\varphi \left(b,{u}_{j,i}\right)\le \varphi \left(b,{x}_{j}\right)+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j}.$
Notice that the two inequalities above are equivalent to the following inequalities, respectively:
$2〈a,J{x}_{j}-J{u}_{j,i}〉\le {\parallel {x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}-{\parallel {u}_{j,i}\parallel }^{2}+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j},$
and
$2〈b,J{x}_{j}-J{u}_{j,i}〉\le {\parallel {x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}-{\parallel {u}_{j,i}\parallel }^{2}+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j}.$
These imply that
$2〈ta+\left(1-t\right)b,J{x}_{j}-J{u}_{j,i}〉\le {\parallel {x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}-{\parallel {u}_{j,i}\parallel }^{2}+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j},\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }t\in \left(0,1\right).$
Since ${C}_{j,i}$ is convex, we see that $ta+\left(1-t\right)b\in {C}_{j,i}$. Notice that the above inequality is equivalent to
$\varphi \left(ta+\left(1-t\right)b,{u}_{j,i}\right)\le \varphi \left(ta+\left(1-t\right)b,{x}_{j}\right)+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j}.$

This proves that ${C}_{j+1,i}$ is convex. This completes that ${C}_{n}$ is closed and convex.

Next, we prove that $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{n}$. It suffices to claim that $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{n,i}$ for every $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$. Note that $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{1,i}=C$. Suppose that $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{j,i}$ for some j and for every $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$. Then, for $\mathrm{\forall }w\in \mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{j,i}$, we have
$\begin{array}{r}\varphi \left(w,{u}_{j,i}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\varphi \left(w,{S}_{{r}_{j,i}}{y}_{j}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\varphi \left(w,{J}^{-1}\left({\alpha }_{j}J{x}_{j}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)J{T}^{j}{x}_{j}\right)\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}={\parallel w\parallel }^{2}-2〈w,{\alpha }_{j}J{x}_{j}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)J{T}^{j}{x}_{j}〉\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+{\parallel {\alpha }_{j}J{x}_{j}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)J{T}^{j}{x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le {\parallel w\parallel }^{2}-2{\alpha }_{j}〈w,J{x}_{j}〉-2\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)〈w,J{T}^{j}{x}_{j}〉+{\alpha }_{j}{\parallel {x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right){\parallel {T}^{j}{x}_{j}\parallel }^{2}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}={\alpha }_{j}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)\varphi \left(w,{T}^{j}{x}_{j}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le {\alpha }_{j}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)\left(1+{\mu }_{j}\right)\varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+{\xi }_{j}\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+{\mu }_{j}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+{\xi }_{j}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{j}\right)+{\mu }_{j}{M}_{j}+{\xi }_{j}.\end{array}$

This shows that $w\in {C}_{j+1,i}$. This implies that $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{n}$ for every $n\ge 1$.

On the other hand, it follows from Lemma 1.8 that
$\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)=\varphi \left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0},{x}_{0}\right)\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{0}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{0}\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }w\in \mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{n}.$
This shows that the sequence $\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)$ is bounded. In view of (1.2), we see that the sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ is also bounded. Since the space is reflexive, we may, without loss of generality, assume that ${x}_{n}⇀p\in {C}_{n}$. Note that $\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)\le \varphi \left(p,{x}_{0}\right)$. It follows that
$\varphi \left(p,{x}_{0}\right)\le \underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim inf}\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)\le \underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim sup}\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)\le \varphi \left(p,{x}_{0}\right).$
This implies that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right)=\varphi \left(p,{x}_{0}\right).$

Hence, we have $\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel \to \parallel p\parallel$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. In view of the Kadec-Klee property of E, we obtain that ${x}_{n}\to p$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$.

Next, we show that $p\in F\left(T\right)$. By the construction of ${C}_{n}$, we have that ${C}_{n+1}\subset {C}_{n}$ and ${x}_{n+1}={\mathrm{\Pi }}_{{C}_{n+1}}{x}_{0}\in {C}_{n}$. It follows that
$\begin{array}{rl}\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{n}\right)& =\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{\mathrm{\Pi }}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0}\right)\\ \le \varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{0}\right)-\varphi \left({\mathrm{\Pi }}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0},{x}_{0}\right)\\ =\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{0}\right)-\varphi \left({x}_{n},{x}_{0}\right).\end{array}$
Letting $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$, we obtain that $\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{n}\right)\to 0$. In view of ${x}_{n+1}\in {C}_{n+1}$, we see that
$\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{u}_{n,i}\right)\le \varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{x}_{n}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}.$
It follows that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{u}_{n,i}\right)=0.$
From (1.2), we see that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel {u}_{n,i}\parallel =\parallel p\parallel$. It follows that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel J{u}_{n,i}\parallel =\parallel Jp\parallel$. This implies that $\left\{J{u}_{n,i}\right\}$ is bounded. Note that E is reflexive and ${E}^{\ast }$ is also reflexive. We may assume that $J{u}_{n,i}⇀{x}^{\ast ,i}\in {E}^{\ast }$. In view of the reflexivity of E, we see that $J\left(E\right)={E}^{\ast }$. This shows that there exists an ${x}^{i}\in E$ such that $J{x}^{i}={x}^{\ast ,i}$. It follows that
$\begin{array}{rl}\varphi \left({x}_{n+1},{u}_{n,i}\right)& ={\parallel {x}_{n+1}\parallel }^{2}-2〈{x}_{n+1},J{u}_{n}〉+{\parallel {u}_{n}\parallel }^{2}\\ ={\parallel {x}_{n+1}\parallel }^{2}-2〈{x}_{n+1},J{u}_{n}〉+{\parallel J{u}_{n}\parallel }^{2}.\end{array}$
Taking ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}$ on the both sides of the equality above yields that
$\begin{array}{rl}0& \ge {\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,{x}^{\ast ,i}〉+{\parallel {x}^{\ast ,i}\parallel }^{2}\\ ={\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,J{x}^{i}〉+{\parallel J{x}^{i}\parallel }^{2}\\ ={\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,J{x}^{i}〉+{\parallel {x}^{i}\parallel }^{2}\\ =\varphi \left(p,{x}^{i}\right).\end{array}$
That is, $p={x}^{i}$, which in turn implies that ${x}^{\ast ,i}=Jp$. It follows that $J{u}_{n,i}⇀Jp\in {E}^{\ast }$. Since ${E}^{\ast }$ enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we obtain that $J{u}_{n,i}-Jp\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Note that ${J}^{-1}:{E}^{\ast }\to E$ is demi-continuous. It follows that ${u}_{n,i}⇀p$. Since E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we obtain that ${u}_{n,i}\to p$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Note that
$\parallel {x}_{n}-{u}_{n,i}\parallel \le \parallel {x}_{n}-p\parallel +\parallel p-{u}_{n,i}\parallel .$
It follows that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel {x}_{n}-{u}_{n,i}\parallel =0.$
(2.1)
Since J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded sets, we have
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{u}_{n,i}\parallel =0.$
(2.2)
Let $r={sup}_{n\ge 0}\left\{\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel ,\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right\}$. Since E is uniformly smooth, we know that ${E}^{\ast }$ is uniformly convex. In view of Lemma 1.6, we see that
$\begin{array}{r}\varphi \left(w,{u}_{n,i}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\varphi \left(w,{S}_{{r}_{n,i}}{y}_{n}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}=\varphi \left(w,{J}^{-1}\left({\alpha }_{n}J{x}_{n}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{j}\right)J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\right)\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}={\parallel w\parallel }^{2}-2〈w,{\alpha }_{n}J{x}_{n}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}〉\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+{\parallel {\alpha }_{n}J{x}_{n}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le {\parallel w\parallel }^{2}-2{\alpha }_{n}〈w,J{x}_{n}〉-2\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)〈w,J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}〉+{\alpha }_{n}{\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}+\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right){\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}-{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}={\alpha }_{n}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)\varphi \left(w,{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\right)-{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le {\alpha }_{n}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)\left(1+{\mu }_{n}\right)\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+{\xi }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)\\ \phantom{\rule{2em}{0ex}}-{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+{\mu }_{n}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+{\xi }_{n}-{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)\\ \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}-{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right).\end{array}$
It follows that
${\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{u}_{n,i}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}.$
Notice that
$\begin{array}{rl}\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{u}_{n,i}\right)& ={\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}-{\parallel {u}_{n,i}\parallel }^{2}-2〈w,J{x}_{n}-J{u}_{n,i}〉\\ \le \parallel {x}_{n}-{u}_{n,i}\parallel \left(\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel +\parallel {u}_{n,i}\parallel \right)+2\parallel w\parallel \parallel J{x}_{n}-J{u}_{n,i}\parallel .\end{array}$
It follows from (2.1) and (2.2) that $\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{u}_{n,i}\right)\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. In view of ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)>0$, we see that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}g\left(\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \right)=0$. It follows from the property of g that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel J{x}_{n}-J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel =0.$
(2.3)
Since ${x}_{n}\to p$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$ and $J:E\to {E}^{\ast }$ is demi-continuous, we obtain that $J{x}_{n}⇀Jp\in {E}^{\ast }$. Note that
$|\parallel J{x}_{n}\parallel -\parallel Jp\parallel |=|\parallel {x}_{n}\parallel -\parallel p\parallel |\le \parallel {x}_{n}-p\parallel .$
This implies that $\parallel J{x}_{n}\parallel \to \parallel Jp\parallel$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Since ${E}^{\ast }$ enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we see that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel J{x}_{n}-Jp\parallel =0.$
(2.4)
Notice that
$\parallel J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}-Jp\parallel \le \parallel J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}-J{x}_{n}\parallel +\parallel J{x}_{n}-Jp\parallel .$
It follows from (2.3) and (2.4) that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}-Jp\parallel =0.$
(2.5)
Note that ${J}^{-1}:{E}^{\ast }\to E$ is demi-continuous. It follows that ${T}^{n}{x}_{n}⇀p$. On the other hand, we have
$|\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel -\parallel p\parallel |=|\parallel J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel -\parallel Jp\parallel |\le \parallel J{T}^{n}{x}_{n}-Jp\parallel .$
In view of (2.5), we obtain that $\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel \to \parallel p\parallel$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Since E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we obtain that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}-p\parallel =0.$
(2.6)
Note that
$\parallel {T}^{n+1}{x}_{n}-p\parallel \le \parallel {T}^{n+1}{x}_{n}-{T}^{n}{x}_{n}\parallel +\parallel {T}^{n}{x}_{n}-p\parallel .$
It follows from the asymptotic regularity of T and (2.6) that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel {T}^{n+1}{x}_{n}-p\parallel =0.$

That is, $T{T}^{n}{x}_{n}-p\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. It follows from the closedness of T that $Tp=p$.

Next, we show that $p\in {\bigcap }_{i\in \mathrm{\Delta }}EF\left({F}_{i}\right)$. Notice that $\varphi \left(w,{y}_{n}\right)\le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}$. In view of ${u}_{n,i}={S}_{{r}_{n,i}}{y}_{n}$, we find from Lemma 1.8 that
$\begin{array}{rl}\varphi \left({u}_{n,i},{y}_{n}\right)& =\varphi \left({S}_{{r}_{n,i}}{y}_{n},{y}_{n}\right)\\ \le \varphi \left(w,{y}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{S}_{{r}_{n,i}}{y}_{n}\right)\\ \le \varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{S}_{{r}_{n,i}}{y}_{n}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}\\ =\varphi \left(w,{x}_{n}\right)-\varphi \left(w,{u}_{n,i}\right)+{\mu }_{n}{M}_{n}+{\xi }_{n}.\end{array}$
This in turn implies that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\varphi \left({u}_{n,i},{y}_{n}\right)=0.$
It follows from (1.2) that $\parallel {u}_{n,i}\parallel -\parallel {y}_{n}\parallel \to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. In view of ${u}_{n,i}\to p$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$, we arrive at ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel {y}_{n}\parallel =\parallel p\parallel$. It follows that ${lim}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}\parallel J{y}_{n}\parallel =\parallel Jp\parallel$. Since ${E}^{\ast }$ is reflexive, we may assume that $J{y}_{n}⇀{f}^{\ast }\in {E}^{\ast }$. In view of $J\left(E\right)={E}^{\ast }$, we see that there exists $f\in E$ such that $Jf={f}^{\ast }$. It follows that
$\varphi \left({u}_{n,i},{y}_{n}\right)={\parallel {u}_{n,i}\parallel }^{2}-2〈{u}_{n,i},J{y}_{n}〉+{\parallel J{y}_{n}\parallel }^{2}.$
Taking ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}$ on the both sides of the equality above yields that
$\begin{array}{rl}0& \ge {\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,{f}^{\ast }〉+{\parallel {f}^{\ast }\parallel }^{2}\\ ={\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,Jf〉+{\parallel Jf\parallel }^{2}\\ ={\parallel p\parallel }^{2}-2〈p,Jf〉+{\parallel f\parallel }^{2}\\ =\varphi \left(p,f\right).\end{array}$
That is, $p=f$, which in turn implies that ${f}^{\ast }=Jp$. It follows that $J{y}_{n}⇀Jp\in {E}^{\ast }$. Since ${E}^{\ast }$ enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we obtain that $J{y}_{n}-Jp\to 0$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Note that ${J}^{-1}:{E}^{\ast }\to E$ is demi-continuous. It follows that ${y}_{n}⇀p$. Since E enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, we obtain that ${y}_{n}\to p$ as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$. Notice that $\parallel {u}_{n,i}-{y}_{n}\parallel \le \parallel {u}_{n,i}-p\parallel +\parallel p-{y}_{n}\parallel$. It follows that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel {u}_{n,i}-{y}_{n}\parallel =0.$
Since J is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded sets, we have
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\parallel J{u}_{n,i}-J{y}_{n}\parallel =0.$
From the assumption ${r}_{n,i}\ge {a}_{i}$, we see that
$\underset{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{lim}\frac{\parallel J{u}_{n,i}-J{y}_{n}\parallel }{{r}_{n,i}}=0.$
Notice that
${F}_{i}\left({u}_{n,i},y\right)+\frac{1}{{r}_{n,i}}〈y-{u}_{n,i},J{u}_{n,i}-J{y}_{n}〉\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$
It follows from condition (A2) that
$\parallel y-{u}_{n,i}\parallel \frac{\parallel J{u}_{n,i}-J{y}_{n}\parallel }{{r}_{n,i}}\ge \frac{1}{{r}_{n,i}}〈y-{u}_{n,i},J{u}_{n,i}-J{y}_{n}〉\ge {F}_{i}\left(y,{u}_{n,i}\right),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$
By taking the limit as $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$ in the above inequality, from condition (A4) we obtain that
${F}_{i}\left(y,p\right)\le 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }y\in C.$
For $0<{t}_{i}<1$ and $y\in C$, define ${y}_{{t}_{i}}={t}_{i}y+\left(1-{t}_{i}\right)p$. It follows that ${y}_{t,i}\in C$, which yields that ${F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},p\right)\le 0$. It follows from conditions (A1) and (A4) that
$0={F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},{y}_{t,i}\right)\le {t}_{i}{F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},y\right)+\left(1-{t}_{i}\right){F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},p\right)\le {t}_{i}{F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},y\right).$
That is,
${F}_{i}\left({y}_{t,i},y\right)\ge 0.$

Letting ${t}_{i}↓0$, we find from condition (A3) that ${F}_{i}\left(p,y\right)\ge 0$, $\mathrm{\forall }y\in C$. This implies that $p\in \mathit{EP}\left({F}_{i}\right)$. This completes the proof that $p\in \mathrm{\Omega }$.

Finally, we prove that $p={\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$. From ${x}_{n}={\mathrm{\Pi }}_{{C}_{n}}{x}_{0}$, we see that
$〈{x}_{n}-z,J{x}_{0}-J{x}_{n}〉\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }z\in {C}_{n}.$
In view of $\mathrm{\Omega }\subset {C}_{n}$, we find that
$〈{x}_{n}-w,J{x}_{0}-J{x}_{n}〉\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }w\in \mathrm{\Omega }.$
Letting $n\to \mathrm{\infty }$ in the above inequality, we see that
$〈p-w,J{x}_{0}-Jp〉\ge 0,\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\mathrm{\forall }w\in \mathrm{\Omega }.$

In view of Lemma 1.7, we can obtain that $p={\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$. This completes the proof. □

If T is asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive, then we find from Theorem 2.1 the following result.

Corollary 2.2 Let E be a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let Δ be an index set. Let ${F}_{i}$ be a bifunction from $C×C$ to satisfying (A1)-(A4) for every $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$. Let $T:C\to C$ be an asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping. Assume that T is closed asymptotically regular on C and $\mathrm{\Omega }:=F\left(T\right)\cap {\bigcap }_{i\in \mathrm{\Delta }}EF\left({F}_{i}\right)$ is nonempty and bounded. Let $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ be a sequence generated in the following manner:

where ${M}_{n}=sup\left\{\varphi \left(z,{x}_{n}\right):z\in \mathrm{\Omega }\right\}$, $\left\{{\alpha }_{n}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left(0,1\right)$ such that ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)>0$, $\left\{{r}_{n,i}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left[{a}_{i},\mathrm{\infty }\right)$, where $\left\{{a}_{i}\right\}$ is a positive real number sequence. Then the sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ converges strongly to ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$, where ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ is the generalized projection from E onto Ω.

Remark 2.3 Since the index set Δ is arbitrary, Corollary 2.2 is an improvement of the corresponding results in Kim .

Remark 2.4 Corollary 2.2 also improves the corresponding results in Qin et al.  in the following aspects:
1. (a)

from a uniformly smooth and uniformly convex space to a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space which also enjoys the Kadec-Klee property;

2. (b)

from a single bifunction to a family of bifunctions;

3. (c)

from a quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping to an asymptotically quasi-ϕ-nonexpansive mapping.

In the framework of Hilbert spaces, the theorem is reduced to the following.

Corollary 2.5 Let E be a Hilbert space, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let Δ be an index set. Let ${F}_{i}$ be a bifunction from $C×C$ to satisfying (A1)-(A4) for every $i\in \mathrm{\Delta }$. Let $T:C\to C$ be a generalized asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping. Assume that T is closed asymptotically regular on C and $\mathrm{\Omega }:=F\left(T\right)\cap {\bigcap }_{i\in \mathrm{\Delta }}EF\left({F}_{i}\right)$ is nonempty and bounded. Let $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ be a sequence generated in the following manner:

where ${M}_{n}=sup\left\{{\parallel z-{x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}:z\in \mathrm{\Omega }\right\}$, $\left\{{\alpha }_{n}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left(0,1\right)$ such that ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)>0$, $\left\{{r}_{n,i}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left[{a}_{i},\mathrm{\infty }\right)$, where $\left\{{a}_{i}\right\}$ is a positive real number sequence. Then the sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ converges strongly to ${Proj}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$, where ${Proj}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ is the metric projection from E onto Ω.

Proof In the framework of Hilbert spaces, we find that $\varphi \left(x,y\right)={\parallel x-y\parallel }^{2}$, J is reduced to the identity mapping and the generalized projection ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}$ is reduced to the metric projection ${Proj}_{C}$. This completes the proof. □

For a single bifunction, we also have the following.

Corollary 2.6 Let E be a Hilbert space, and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. Let F be a bifunction from $C×C$ to satisfying (A1)-(A4). Let $T:C\to C$ be a generalized asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mapping. Assume that T is closed asymptotically regular on C and $\mathrm{\Omega }:=F\left(T\right)\cap EF\left(F\right)$ is nonempty and bounded. Let $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ be a sequence generated in the following manner:

where ${M}_{n}=sup\left\{{\parallel z-{x}_{n}\parallel }^{2}:z\in \mathrm{\Omega }\right\}$, $\left\{{\alpha }_{n}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left(0,1\right)$ such that ${lim inf}_{n\to \mathrm{\infty }}{\alpha }_{n}\left(1-{\alpha }_{n}\right)>0$, $\left\{{r}_{n,i}\right\}$ is a real number sequence in $\left[a,\mathrm{\infty }\right)$, where a is a positive real number. Then the sequence $\left\{{x}_{n}\right\}$ converges strongly to ${Proj}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}{x}_{0}$, where ${Proj}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}$ is the metric projection from E onto Ω.

Proof In the framework of Hilbert spaces, we find that $\varphi \left(x,y\right)={\parallel x-y\parallel }^{2}$, J is reduced to the identity mapping, and the generalized projection ${\mathrm{\Pi }}_{C}$ is reduced to the metric projection ${Proj}_{C}$. In view of Corollary 2.5, we may immediately conclude the desired results. □

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to the editor and the anonymous reviewers for suggestions which improved the contents of the article.

## Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Mathematics and Information Science, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China

## References

Advertisement 