 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
The relation between Aharmonic operator and ADirac system
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2013, Article number: 362 (2013)
Abstract
In this paper, we show how an Aharmonic operator arises from Dirac systems under controllable growth condition. By the method of removable singularities for solutions to the ADirac system with controllable growth conditions, we establish the fact that an Aharmonic operator is a real part of the corresponding ADirac systems.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we study the relation between an Aharmonic operator and ADirac systems under controllable growth conditions. The equations defined by the Aharmonic operator are
where
x\to A(x,\xi ) is measurable for all ξ, and \xi \to A(x,\xi ) is continuous for a.e. x\in \mathrm{\Omega}. Further assume that A(x,\xi ) satisfies the following structure conditions with p>1:
for some constant a>0, and p represents an exponent throughout the paper. The inhomogeneity f(x,\xi ) satisfies the following controllable growth condition:
where s=\frac{np}{np} for n>p; s is any exponent for n=p.
Definition 1.1 We call a function u\in {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1,p}(\mathrm{\Omega}) a weak solution to (1.1) under the structure conditions (1.3) and (1.4) if the equality
holds for all \varphi \in {W}^{1,p}(\mathrm{\Omega}) with compact support.
The ADirac systems in current paper are of the form
The main purpose of this paper is to show that under controllable growth condition, an equation defined by the Aharmonic operator is a real part of the corresponding ADirac system. In order to obtain the desired result, we use the method of removability theorems, which proved that under suitable condition, a result concerning removable singularities for equations defined by the Aharmonic operator satisfying the Lipschitz condition or of bounded mean oscillation extends to Cliffordvalued solutions to the corresponding Dirac equation. Further discussion on nonlinear Dirac equations can be found in [1–9] and their references.
The method of removability theorems was introduced by AbreuBlaya et al. in [1], where they showed that {r}^{n}\omega (r)Hausdorff measure sets of monogenic functions with modulus of continuity \omega (r) can be removed. The results were extended to Hölder continuous analytic functions [10] by Kaufman and Wu immediately. And then, Koskela and Martio [11] established that in Hölder and bounded mean oscillation classes, the sets satisfying a certain geometric condition related to Minkowski dimension of an Aharmonic function can be removed. In terms of Hausdorff dimension, a precise condition for removable sets of Aharmonic functions in the case of Hölder continuity exists [12]. The results were generalized [9] to the ADirac equation satisfying a certain oscillation condition. In the current paper, we further extend the results in [9] to discover the relation between the inhomogeneity Aharmonic equations and the inhomogeneity ADirac equations under controllable growth condition and obtain the main result as follows. It implies that under suitable condition, the solutions to the Aharmonic equation under controllable growth condition in fact is a real part of weak solutions to the corresponding ADirac systems.
Theorem 1.1 Let E be a relatively closed subset of Ω. Suppose that u\in {L}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{p}(\mathrm{\Omega}) has distributional first derivatives in Ω, u is a solution to the scalar part of ADirac equation (1.6) under controllable growth condition in \mathrm{\Omega}\setminus E, and u is of p,koscillation in \mathrm{\Omega}\setminus E. If for each compact subset K of E
then u extends to a solution of the ADirac equation in Ω.
2 ADirac operator
In this section, we introduce an ADirac operator. In order to definite the ADirac operator, we should present the definition and notations about Clifford algebra at first [9].
We write {\mathcal{U}}_{n} for the real universal Clifford algebra over {R}^{n}. The Clifford algebra is generated over R by the basis of reduced products
where \{{e}_{1},{e}_{2},\dots ,{e}_{n}\} is an orthogonal basis of {R}^{n} with the relation {e}_{i}{e}_{j}+{e}_{j}{e}_{i}=2{\delta}_{ij}. We write {e}_{0} for the identity. The dimension of {\mathcal{U}}_{n} is {R}^{{2}^{n}}, which implies an increasing tower R\subset C\subset H\subset {\mathcal{U}}_{n}\subset \cdots . The Clifford algebra {\mathcal{U}}_{n} is a graded algebra as {\mathcal{U}}_{n}={\u2a01}_{l}{\mathcal{U}}_{n}^{l}, where {\mathcal{U}}_{n}^{l} are those elements whose reduced Clifford products have length l.
For A\subset {\mathcal{U}}_{n}, \mathit{Sc}(A) denotes the scalar part of A, that is, the coefficient of the element {e}_{0}, where \mathrm{\Omega}\subset {R}^{n} is a connected and open set with boundary ∂ Ω. A Cliffordvalued function u:\mathrm{\Omega}\to {\mathcal{U}}_{n} can be written as u={\sum}_{\alpha}{u}_{\alpha}{e}_{\alpha}, where each {u}_{\alpha} is realvalued and {e}_{\alpha} are reduced products. The norm used here is given by {\sum}_{\alpha}{u}_{\alpha}{e}_{\alpha}={({\sum}_{\alpha}{u}_{\alpha}^{2})}^{1/2}. This norm is submultiplicative, AB\le CAB.
The Dirac operator used here is
Also, {D}^{2}=\mathrm{\u25b3}. Here △ is the Laplace operator which operates only on coefficients. A function is monogenic when Du=0.
Q is a cube in Ω with volume Q throughout the paper. We write σQ for the cube with the same center as Q and with sidelength σ times that of Q. For q>0, we write {L}^{q}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}) for the space of Cliffordvalued functions in Ω whose coefficients belong to the usual {L}^{q}(\mathrm{\Omega}) space. Also, {W}^{1,q}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}) is the space of Cliffordvalued functions in Ω whose coefficients as well as their first distributional derivatives are in {L}^{q}(\mathrm{\Omega}). We also write {L}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{q}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}) for \cap {L}^{q}({\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\prime},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}), where the intersection is over all {\mathrm{\Omega}}^{\prime} compactly contained in Ω. We similarly write {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1,q}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}). Moreover, we write {\mathcal{M}}_{\mathrm{\Omega}}=\{u:\mathrm{\Omega}\to {\mathcal{U}}_{n}Du=0\} for the space of monogenic functions in Ω.
Furthermore, we define the Dirac Sobolev space
The local space {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{D,p} is similarly defined. Notice that if u is monogenic, then u\in {L}^{p}(\mathrm{\Omega}) if and only if u\in {W}^{D,p}(\mathrm{\Omega}). Also, it is immediate that {W}^{1,p}(\mathrm{\Omega})\subset {W}^{D,p}(\mathrm{\Omega}).
Under such definitions and notations, we can introduce the operator of ADirac. Define linear isomorphism \theta :{R}^{n}\to {\mathcal{U}}_{n}^{1} by
For x,y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{n}, we have
Here \tilde{A}(x,\xi ):\mathrm{\Omega}\times {\mathcal{U}}_{1}\to {\mathcal{U}}_{1} is defined by
which means that (1.5) is equivalent to
For the Clifford conjugation \overline{({e}_{j1}\cdots {e}_{jl})}={(1)}^{l}{e}_{jl}\cdots {e}_{j1}, we define a Cliffordvalued inner product as \overline{\alpha}\beta. Moreover, the scalar part of this Clifford inner product Re(\overline{\alpha}\beta ) is the usual inner product in {\mathbb{R}}^{{2}^{n}}, \u3008\alpha ,\beta \u3009, when α and β are identified as vectors.
For convenience, we replace \tilde{A} with A, recast the structure equations above and define the operator
where A preserves the grading of the Clifford algebra, x\to A(x,\xi ) is measurable for all ξ, and \xi \to A(x,\xi ) is continuous for a.e. x\in \mathrm{\Omega}. Furthermore, here A(x,\xi ) satisfies the structure conditions with p>1,
for some constant a>0. We can definite the weak solution of equation (1.6) as follows.
Definition 2.1 A Cliffordvalued function u\in {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{D,p}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}^{k}), for k=0,1,2,\dots ,n, is a weak solution to (1.6) under structure conditions (2.10) and (2.11), and further assume that the inhomogeneity term f(x,Du) satisfies the following controllable growth condition:
where s=\frac{np}{np} for n>p; s is any exponent for n=p.
For all \varphi \in {W}^{1,p}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}^{k}) with compact support we have
Notice that when A is identity, then the homogeneity part of (2.13)
is the Clifford Laplacian. Moreover, these equations generalize the important case of the pDirac equation
Here A(x,\xi )={\xi }^{p2}\xi.
These equations were introduced and their conformal invariance was studied in [7].
Furthermore, when u is a realvalued function, (2.14) implies that A(x,\mathrm{\nabla}u) is a harmonic field, and locally there exists a harmonic function H such that A(x,\mathrm{\nabla}u)=\mathrm{\nabla}H. If A(x,\xi ) is invertible, then \mathrm{\nabla}u={A}^{1}(x,\mathrm{\nabla}H). Hence, the regularity of A implies the regularity of the solution u.
In general, Aharmonic functions do not have such regularity. This suggests the study of the scalar part of system (2.13) in general. Thus a Caccioppoli estimate for solutions to the scalar part of (2.13) is necessary.
3 The proof of main results
In this section, we establish the main results. Thus, a suitable Caccioppoli estimate for solutions to (2.13) is necessary.
Theorem 3.1 Let u be a solution to the scalar part of (1.6) defined by (2.13), and let Q be a cube with \sigma Q\subset \mathrm{\Omega}, where \sigma >1. Then
Proof Let \eta \in {C}_{\mathrm{\infty}}^{0}(\mathrm{\Omega}) be a standard cutoff function, \eta >0, \eta \equiv 1 in Q. Choose \varphi =(u{u}_{\sigma Q}){\eta}^{p} as a test function in (2.13). Then D\varphi =p{\eta}^{p1}(D\eta )(u{u}_{\sigma Q})+{\eta}^{p}Du. Using the structure conditions (2.10) and (2.11),
which means that
Using Hölder’s inequality and (2.11), we have
Using Young’s inequality, we get
Using (2.12) and then the Sobolev embedding theorem yields
Hence, combining inequalities (3.4) and (3.5) and choosing \epsilon >0 small enough, we have
Noticing that D\eta \le C{Q}^{1/n}, we obtain
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. □
In order to discover the relation between Aharmonic equations and ADirac systems, we should remove singularity of solutions to ADirac systems at first. Thus, various regularity properties of realvalued functions, such as the following definition [9], are needed.
Definition 3.1 Assume that u\in {L}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1}(\mathrm{\Omega},{\mathcal{U}}_{n}), q>0 and that \mathrm{\infty}<k\le 1. We say that u is of q,koscillation in Ω when
The infimum over monogenic functions is natural since they are trivial solutions to an ADirac equation just as constants are solutions to an Aharmonic equation. If u is a function and q=1, then (3.7) is equivalent to the usual definition of the bounded mean oscillation when k=0 and (3.7) is equivalent to the usual local Lipschitz condition when 0<k\le 1 [13]. Moreover, at least when u is a solution to an Aharmonic equation, (3.7) is equivalent to a local order of growth condition when \mathrm{\infty}<k<0 [5, 13]. In these cases, the supremum is finite if we choose {u}_{Q} to be the average value of the function u over the cube Q. It is easy to see that in condition (3.7) the expansion factor ‘2’ can be replaced by any factor greater than 1.
If the coefficients of an ADirac solution u are of bounded mean oscillation, local Hölder continuous, or of a certain local order of growth, then u is in an appropriate oscillation class [8].
Notice that monogenic functions satisfy (3.7) just as the space of constants is a subspace of the bounded mean oscillation and Lipschitz spaces of realvalued functions. We remark that it follows from Hölder’s inequality that if s\le q and if u is of q,koscillation, then u is of s,koscillation. The following lemma shows that Definition 2.1 is independent of the expansion factor of the cube [9].
Lemma 3.1 Suppose that F\in {L}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1}(\mathrm{\Omega},\mathbb{R}), F>0 a.e., \gamma \in \mathbb{R}, and {\sigma}_{1},{\sigma}_{2}>1. If
then
Then we can prove the main result.
Proof of Theorem 1.1 Let Q be a cube in the Whitney decomposition of \mathrm{\Omega}\setminus E.
We use the Whitney decomposition \mathcal{W}=\{Q\} of Ω. The Whitney decomposition consists of closed dyadic cubes with disjoint interiors which satisfy

(a)
\mathrm{\Omega}\setminus E={\bigcup}_{Q\in \mathcal{W}}Q,

(b)
{Q}^{1/n}\le d(Q,\partial \mathrm{\Omega})\le 4{Q}^{1/n},

(c)
(1/4){Q}^{1/n}\le {{Q}_{2}}^{1/n}\le 4{{Q}_{1}}^{1/n} when {Q}_{1}\cap {Q}_{2} is not empty.
Here d(Q,\partial \mathrm{\Omega}) is the Euclidean distance between Q and the boundary of Ω [14].
Thus, if A\subset \mathbb{R} and r>0, we can define the rinflation of A as
From Theorem 3.1, we have
Note that u\in {W}^{D,p}(\mathrm{\Omega}) yields
and
Using the Caccioppoli estimate (3.1) and the p,koscillation condition (3.7), we have
where a=(n+pkp)/n and note that \mathrm{\infty}<k\le 1. Since the problem is local (use a partition of unity), we show that (2.13) holds whenever \varphi \in {W}_{0}^{1,p}(B({x}_{0},r)) with {x}_{0}\in E and r>0 sufficiently small. Choose r=(1/5\sqrt{n})min\{1,d({x}_{0},\partial \mathrm{\Omega})\} and let K=E\cap \overline{B}({x}_{0},4r). Then K is a compact subset of E. Also, let {W}_{0} be those cubes in the Whitney decomposition of \mathrm{\Omega}\setminus E. Notice that each cube Q\in {W}_{0} lies in K(1)\setminus K. Let \gamma =p(k1)k. First, since \gamma \ge 1, it follows that m(K)=m(E)=0 [7]. Also, since an\ge \gamma using (3.11) and (3.14), we obtain
Hence, u\in {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{D,p}.
Next, let B=B({x}_{0},r) and assume that \psi \in {C}_{0}^{\mathrm{\infty}}(B). Also, let {W}_{j}, j=1,2,\dots be those cubes Q\in {W}_{0} with l(Q)\le {2}^{j}.
Consider the scalar functions
Thus, each {\varphi}_{j}, j=1,2,\dots , is Lipschitz, equal to 1 on K and such that \psi (1{\varphi}_{j})\in {W}^{1,p}(B\setminus E) with compact support. Hence,
where
since u is a solution in B\setminus E, {I}^{\prime}=0.
Also, we have
Now there exists a constant c such that \psi \le c<\mathrm{\infty}. Hence, using Hölder’s inequality, we have
Next, using (3.14), we get
Now, for x\in Q\in {W}_{j}, d(x,K) is bounded above and below by a multiple of {Q}^{1/n} and for Q\in {W}_{j}, {Q}^{1/n}\le {2}^{j}. Hence,
Since \cup {W}_{j}\subset K(1)\setminus K and \cup {W}_{j}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}, it follows that {I}_{1}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}.
Again, using Hölder’s inequality,
Since u\in {W}_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1,D}(\mathrm{\Omega}) and \cup {W}_{j}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}, we have that {I}_{2}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}. Hence, {I}^{\u2033}\to 0.
where we have used the fact that a=(n+pkp)/n for \mathrm{\infty}<k\le 1.
Since \cup {W}_{j}\subset K(1)\setminus K and {W}_{j}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}, it follows that {I}^{\u2034}\to 0 as j\to \mathrm{\infty}. □
References
AbreuBlaya R, BoryReyes J, PeñaPeña D: Jump problem and removable singularities for monogenic functions. J. Geom. Anal. 2007, 17(1):1–13.
Chen Q, Jost J, Li J, Wang G: Diracharmonic maps. Math. Z. 2006, 254(2):409–432.
Chen Q, Jost J, Li J, Wang G: Regularity theorems and energy identities for Diracharmonic maps. Math. Z. 2005, 251(1):61–84.
Chen Q, Jost J, Wang G: Nonlinear Dirac equations on Riemann surfaces. Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom. 2008, 33(3):253–270.
Wang C: A remark on nonlinear Dirac equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2010, 138(10):3753–3758.
Wang C, Xu D: Remark on Dirac harmonic maps. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2009, 20: 3759–3792.
Nolder CA, Ryan J: p Dirac operators. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2009, 19(2):391–402.
Nolder CA: Nonlinear ADirac equation. Adv. Appl. Clifford Algebras 2011, 21(2):429–440.
Nolder CA: Aharmonic equations and the Dirac operator. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 124018
Kaufman R, Wu JM: Removable singularities for analytic or subharmonic functions. Ark. Mat. 1980, 18(1):107–116.
Koskela P, Martio O: Removability theorems for solutions of degenerate elliptic partial differential equations. Ark. Mat. 1993, 31(2):339–353.
Kilpelainen T, Zhong X: Removable sets for continuous solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2002, 130(6):1681–1688.
Meyers NG: Mean oscillation over cubes and Hölder continuity. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1964, 15(5):717–721.
Stein EM Princeton Mathematical Series 30. In Singular Integrals and Differentiability Properties of Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton; 1970.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 11201415); the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2012J01027) and Training Programme Foundation for Excellent Youth Researching Talents of Fujian’s Universities (JA12205).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
ZW participated in design of the study and drafted the manuscript. SC participated in conceived of the study and the amendment of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Z., Chen, S. The relation between Aharmonic operator and ADirac system. J Inequal Appl 2013, 362 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2013362
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2013362
Keywords
 Aharmonic operator
 ADirac system
 Caccioppoli estimate
 controllable growth condition