Skip to main content

Generalized Dunkl-Williams inequality in 2-inner product spaces

Abstract

We consider the generalized Dunkl-Williams inequality in 2-normed spaces. Also, we give necessary and sufficient conditions for having the equality case in the strictly convex 2-normed space X.

1 Introductions and preliminaries

In 1964, Dunkl and Williams [1] proved that if x, y are non-zero vectors in a normed linear space X, then

x x y y 4 x y x + y .
(1.1)

Also, after that it was proved that the equality holds if and only if x=y.

Maligranda [2] obtained a refinement of the Dunkl-Williams inequality. He proved that if x, y are non-zero vectors in a normed linear space X, then

(1.2)
(1.3)

Also, the Maligranda inequality and its reverse in normed linear spaces were proved by Mercer in [3]. In [4] Kato et al. improved the triangle inequality and provided the reverse by showing that

(1.4)
(1.5)

for all non-zero elements x 1 ,, x n of a normed linear space.

Pečarić and Rajić [5] sharpened inequalities (1.4) and (1.5) (when n>2) and generalized inequalities (1.2) and (1.3) by showing that

(1.6)
(1.7)

for all non-zero elements x 1 ,, x n of a normed linear space.

Dragomir [6] replaced arbitrary scalars instead of 1 x i for i=1,,n in inequalities (1.6) and (1.7) and obtained a generalization of inequalities (1.6) and (1.7). This paper contains two sections. In the first section, we will work on a generalized case of Dunkl-Williams inequality in 2-normed spaces and also give necessary and sufficient conditions for having equality. In the second part, we want to introduce a refinement of the inequality x x y y 2 x y x + y in 2-inner product spaces, which was done by Mercer [3] in inner product spaces.

The concept of 2-normed spaces was introduced by Gähler [7] in 1963. After that, in 1973 and 1977, Diminnie, Gähler and White introduced the concept of 2-inner product spaces (see [8, 9]). We offer [10] to readers for more details.

Definition 1.1 Let K be the symbol of the field or and X be a linear space on K. Define the K-valued function (,|) on X×X×X with the following properties:

  1. (1)

    (x,x|y)0; (x,x|y)=0 if and only if x and y are linearly dependent,

  2. (2)

    (x,x|y)=(y,y|x),

  3. (3)

    (x,y|z)= ( y , x | z ) ¯ ,

  4. (4)

    (αx,y|z)=α(x,y|z) for any αK,

  5. (5)

    (x+ x ,y|z)=(x,y|z)+( x ,y|z),

for all x, x ,y,zX. (,|) is called a 2-inner product and (X,(,|)) is called a 2-inner product space.

Lemma 1.2 [10]Let X be a 2-inner product space. Then

| ( x , y | z ) | ( x , x | z ) ( y , y | z )
(1.8)

for every x,y,zX.

Definition 1.3 [10] Let X be a linear space of dimension greater than 1 on the field K and let ,:X×X[0,+) be a function satisfying the following conditions:

  1. (1)

    x,y=0 if and only if x and y are linearly dependent,

  2. (2)

    x,y=y,x,

  3. (3)

    αx,y=|α|x,y for all αK,

  4. (4)

    x+y,zx,z+y,z,

for all x,y,zX. , is called a 2-norm and (X,,) is called a linear 2-normed space.

It follows from (4) that

| x , z y , z | xy,z

for all x,y,zX.

Let X be a 2-inner product space of dimension greater than 1 on the field . If we define x,y= ( x , x | y ) for all x,yX, then , is a 2-norm on X and

(see Theorem 3.1.9 of [10]). In this case, (1.8) means

| ( x , y | z ) | x,zy,z.

A linear 2-normed space (X,,) is said to be strictly convex if x+y,z=x,z+y,z, x,z=y,z=1 and zspan{x,y}, then x=y.

2 Main results

In this section, we establish a generalization of Dunkl-Williams inequality and its reverse in 2-normed spaces.

Theorem 2.1 Let X be a 2-normed space on the field K. For x 1 ,, x n ,zX and a 1 ,, a n K, we have

(2.1)
(2.2)

Proof For a fixed 1in, we have

j = 1 n a j x j , z = j = 1 n a i x j + j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j , z j = 1 n a i x j , z + j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j , z j = 1 n a i x j , z + j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j , z = | a i | j = 1 n x j , z + j = 1 n | a j a i | x j , z .

By taking minimum over i=1,,n, we obtain (2.1).

Now, we have

j = 1 n a j x j , z = j = 1 n a i x j j = 1 n ( a i a j ) x j , z | j = 1 n a i x j , z j = 1 n ( a i a j ) x j , z | j = 1 n a i x j , z j = 1 n ( a i a j ) x j , z = | a i | j = 1 n x j , z j = 1 n | a i a j | x j , z .

By taking maximum over 1in, we obtain (2.2). □

Theorem 2.2 [10]

Let X be a real linear 2-normed space. The following statements are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    (X,,) is strictly convex.

  2. (2)

    If x+y,z=x,z+y,z and zspan{x,y}, then x=λy for some λ>0.

Let X be a real linear 2-normed space. If zspan{x,y} and |(x,y|z)|=x,zy,z, then x=λy for some real λ.

Lemma 2.3 Let X be a linear strictly convex 2-normed space with respect to a 2-inner product on the field . For non-zero elements x 1 ,, x n X satisfying j = 1 n x j 0 , zspan{ x 1 ,, x n } and non-zero elements a 1 ,, a n of such that a i a j for some i, j, the following statements are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    j = 1 n a j x j ,z=| a i | j = 1 n x j ,z+ j = 1 n | a j a i | x j ,z;

  2. (2)

    j = 1 n ( x j , x k |z) a i ( a k a i )= j = 1 n x j ,z| a i || a k a i | x k ,z.

Proof Let (1) hold. For a fixed 1in, we have

j = 1 n a j x j , z = j = 1 n a i x j + j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j , z = | a i | j = 1 n x j , z + j = 1 n | a j a i | x j , z .
(2.3)

From the assumption, there exists a non-empty maximal subset { j 1 ,, j m } of {1,,n} for some 1mn such that a j k a i for all 1km. Hence, (2.3) holds if and only if

j = 1 n a i x j + k = 1 m ( a j k a i ) x j k , z =| a i | j = 1 n x j , z + k = 1 m | a j k a i | x j k ,z.

Using Theorem 2.2, we deduce that there exists β j k >0 such that j = 1 n a i x j = β j k ( a j k a i ) x j k which is equivalent to

( j = 1 n a i x j , ( a j k a i ) x j k | z ) = j = 1 n a i x j , z ( a j k a i ) x j k , z .

So, (1) and (2) are equivalent. □

Lemma 2.4 Let X be a linear strictly convex 2-normed space with respect to a 2-inner product on . For non-zero elements x 1 ,, x n X satisfying j = 1 n x j =0, zspan{ x 1 ,, x n } and non-zero elements a 1 ,, a n of such that a i a j for some i, j, the following statements are equivalent:

  1. (1)

    j = 1 n a j x j ,z= j = 1 n | a j a i | x j ,z.

  2. (2)

    There exist 1i,ln such that a l a i and ( x k , x l |z)( a k a i )( a l a i )= x k ,z x l ,z| a k a i || a l a i | for all k.

Proof Let i (1in) be fixed. By j = 1 n x j =0, we get

j = 1 n a j x j = j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j .

Now, by the above equality and (1), we get

j = 1 n ( a j a i ) x j , z = j = 1 n a j x j , z = j = 1 n | a j a i | x j ,z.

Let { j 1 ,, j m } be as in the proof of Lemma 2.3. So,

k = 1 m ( a j k a i ) x j k , z = k = 1 m | a j k a i | x j k ,z.

Now, let 1lm. Then we get

k = 1 k l m ( a j k a i ) x j k + ( a j l a i ) x j l , z = k = 1 k l m | a j k a i | x j k ,z+| a j l a i | x j l ,z.

Hence, for some β j k >0, ( a j k a i ) x j k = β j k ( a j l a i ) x j l . This is equivalent to

( x j k , x j l |z)( a j k a i )( a j l a i )= x j k ,z x j l ,z| a j k a i || a j l a i |,

as desired. □

As an application of Lemmas 2.3 and 2.4, we offer the following theorem.

Theorem 2.5 Let X be a linear strictly convex 2-normed space with respect to a 2-inner product on . Also, let x 1 ,, x n X be non-zero elements, zspan{ x 1 ,, x n } and a 1 ,, a n R be non-zero elements such that a i a j for some i, j.

  1. (1)

    If j = 1 n x j 0, then

    j = 1 n a j x j , z = min 1 k n { | a i | j = 1 n x j , z + j = 1 n | a j a i | x j , z }

if and only if there exists 1in such that

j = 1 n ( x j , x k |z) a i ( a k a i )= j = 1 n x j , z | a i || a k a i | x k ,z.
  1. (2)

    If j = 1 n x j =0, then

    j = 1 n a j x j , z = min 1 k n j = 1 n | a j a i | x j ,z

if and only if there exist 1i,ln such that a l a i and

( x k , x l |z)( a k a i )( a l a i )= x k ,z x l ,z| a k a i || a l a i |

for all k.

3 Improvement of Dunkl-Williams inequality with two elements

In [1], Dunkl and Williams proved that in inequality (1.1) the constant 4 is the best choice in normed linear spaces. Moreover, they proved that in an inner product space, the constant 4 can be replaced by 2; that is,

x x y y 2 x y x + y .
(3.1)

In addition, the equality in (3.1) holds if and only if x=y.

In 2-inner product spaces, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 3.1 [11]For non-zero vectors x, y, z in a 2-inner product space X with zspan{x,y},

x x , z y y , z , z 2 x y , z x , z + y , z .
(3.2)

If X is a linear 2-normed space in Theorem 3.1, then we have the following inequality:

x x , z y y , z , z 4 x y , z x , z + y , z .

A refinement of (3.1) has been obtained by Mercer [3]. Now, we use Mercer’s inequality and give a refinement of (3.2).

Theorem 3.2 Let x, y, z be non-zero vectors in a 2-inner product space X with zspan{x,y}. Then we have

(3.3)

Proof Let α= x x , z y y , z ,z. By using (2.2) for two elements x, −y with constants 1 x , z , 1 y , z respectively, we obtain

α x y , z | x , z y , z | min ( x , z , y , z ) .

Clearly, we have

So,

y,z+x,zxy,z(2α)min ( x , z , y , z ) .

A simple computation shows that

Re ( x , y | z ) x , z y , z =1 1 2 α 2 , α 2 = x y , z 2 ( y , z x , z ) 2 x , z y , z .

Therefore,

Hence,

x y , z 2 ( y , z + x , z 2 ) 2 α 2 ( y , z x , z ) 2 2 (2α).

Therefore,

α 2 2α ( y , z x , z y , z + x , z ) 2 +4 ( y , z x , z ) 2 x y , z 2 ( y , z + x , z ) 2 0.

So, α is between two roots of the quadratic equation

λ 2 2λ ( y , z x , z y , z + x , z ) 2 +4 ( y , z x , z ) 2 x y , z 2 ( y , z + x , z ) 2 =0.

Hence, we get (3.3). □

References

  1. Dunkl CF, Williams KS: A simple norm inequality. Am. Math. Mon. 1964, 71: 53–54. 10.2307/2311304

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Maligranda L: Simple norm inequalities. Am. Math. Mon. 2006, 113(3):256–260. 10.2307/27641893

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Mercer PG: The Dunkl-Williams inequality in an inner product space. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10(2):447–450.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kato M, Saito K-S, Tamura T: Sharp triangle inequality and it’s revers in Banach spaces. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10(2):451–460.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Pečarić JE, Rajić R: The Dunkl-Williams inequality with n -elements in normed linear spaces. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10(2):461–470.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Dragomir SS: Generalization of the Pečarić-Rajić in normed linear spaces. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2009, 12(1):53–65.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gähler S: 2-metrische Räume und ihre topologische struktur. Math. Nachr. 1963, 26: 115–148. 10.1002/mana.19630260109

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Diminnie CR, Gähler S, White A: 2-inner product spaces. Demonstr. Math. 1973, 6: 525–536.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Diminnie CR, Gähler S, White A: 2-inner product spaces II. Demonstr. Math. 1977, 10: 169–188.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho YJ, Lin CS, Kim SS, Misiak A: Theory of 2-Inner Product Spaces. Nova Science Publishers, New York; 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho YJ, Dragomir SS, Lin CS, Kim SS, Kim YH: Some Pečarić’s type inequality in 2-inner product spaces and applications. Taiwan. J. Math. 2008, 12(2):257–372.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (grant number 2012003499).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Hyeong Bae.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors jointly worked on the results and they read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Najati, A., Saem, M.M. & Bae, JH. Generalized Dunkl-Williams inequality in 2-inner product spaces. J Inequal Appl 2013, 36 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-36

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-36

Keywords