Skip to main content

On some inequalities for s-convex functions and applications

Abstract

Some new results related to the left-hand side of the Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for the class of functions whose second derivatives at certain powers are s-convex functions in the second sense are obtained. Also, some applications to special means of real numbers are provided.

MSC:26A51, 26D15.

1 Introduction

The following definition is well known in the literature: a function f:IR, IR, is said to be convex on I if the inequality

f ( t x + ( 1 t ) y ) tf(x)+(1t)f(y)

holds for all x,yI and t[0,1]. Geometrically, this means that if P, Q and R are three distinct points on the graph of f with Q between P and R, then Q is on or below the chord PR.

In their paper [1], Hudzik and Maligranda considered, among others, the class of functions which are s-convex in the second sense. This class is defined in the following way: a function f:[0,)R is said to be s-convex in the second sense if

f ( t x + ( 1 t ) y ) t s f(x)+ ( 1 t ) s f(y)

holds for all x,y[0,), t[0,1] and for some fixed s(0,1]. The class of s-convex functions in the second sense is usually denoted by K s 2 .

It can be easily seen that for s=1 s-convexity reduces to the ordinary convexity of functions defined on [0,).

In the same paper [1], Hudzik and Maligranda proved that if s(0,1), f K s 2 implies f([0,))[0,), i.e., they proved that all functions from K s 2 , s(0,1), are nonnegative.

Example 1 [1]

Let s(0,1) and a,b,cR. We define the function f:[0,)R as

f(t)={ a , t = 0 , b t s + c , t > 0 .

It can be easily checked that

  1. (i)

    if b0 and 0ca, then f K s 2 ,

  2. (ii)

    if b>0 and c<0, then f K s 2 .

Many important inequalities are established for the class of convex functions, but one of the most famous is the so-called Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality (or Hadamard’s inequality). This double inequality is stated as follows: Let f be a convex function on [a,b]R, where ab. Then

f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f(x)dx f ( a ) + f ( b ) 2 .

For several recent results concerning Hadamard’s inequality, we refer the interested reader to [25].

In [6] Dragomir and Fitzpatrick proved a variant of Hadamard’s inequality which holds for s-convex functions in the second sense.

Theorem 1 Suppose that f:[0,)[0,) is an s-convex function in the second sense, where s(0,1), and let a,b[0,), a<b. If fL([a,b]), then the following inequalities hold:

2 s 1 f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f(x)dx f ( a ) + f ( b ) s + 1 .
(1.1)

The constant k=1/(s+1) is best possible in the second inequality in [7].

The above inequalities are sharp. For recent results and generalizations concerning s-convex functions, see [813].

Along this paper, we consider a real interval IR, and we denote that I is the interior of I.

The main aim of this paper is to establish new inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type for the class of functions whose second derivatives at certain powers are s-convex functions in the second sense.

2 Main results

To prove our main results, we consider the following lemma.

Lemma 1 Let f:IRR be a differentiable mapping on I where a,bI with a<b. If f L[a,b], then the following equality holds:

1 b a a b f ( x ) d x f ( a + b 2 ) = ( b a ) 2 16 [ 0 1 t 2 f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t + 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) d t ] .
(2.1)

Proof By integration by parts, we have the following identity:

I 1 = 0 1 t 2 f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t = t 2 2 b a f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | 0 1 4 b a 0 1 t f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t = 2 b a f ( a + b 2 ) 4 b a [ t 2 b a f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | 0 1 2 b a 0 1 f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t ] = 2 b a f ( a + b 2 ) 8 ( b a ) 2 f ( a + b 2 ) + 8 ( b a ) 2 0 1 f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t .
(2.2)

Using the change of the variable x=t a + b 2 +(1t)a for t[0,1] and multiplying the both sides (2.2) by ( b a ) 2 16 , we obtain

( b a ) 2 16 0 1 t 2 f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) d t = b a 8 f ( a + b 2 ) 1 2 f ( a + b 2 ) + 1 b a a a + b 2 f ( x ) d x .
(2.3)

Similarly, we observe that

( b a ) 2 16 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) d t = b a 8 f ( a + b 2 ) 1 2 f ( a + b 2 ) + 1 b a a + b 2 b f ( x ) d x .
(2.4)

Thus, adding (2.3) and (2.4), we get the required identity (2.1). □

Theorem 2 Let f:I[0,)R be a differentiable mapping on I such that f L[a,b], where a,bI with a<b. If |f| is s-convex on [a,b], for some fixed s(0,1], then the following inequality holds:

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) | f ( a + b 2 ) | + | f ( b ) | }
(2.5)
[ 1 + ( s + 2 ) 2 1 s ] ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | } .
(2.6)

Proof From Lemma 1, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 [ 0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | d t + 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | d t ] ( b a ) 2 16 0 1 t 2 [ t s | f ( a + b 2 ) | + ( 1 t ) s | f ( a ) | ] d t + ( b a ) 2 16 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 [ t s | f ( b ) | + ( 1 t ) s | f ( a + b 2 ) | ] d t = ( b a ) 2 16 [ 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( a ) | ] + ( b a ) 2 16 [ 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( b ) | + 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | ] = ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) | f ( a + b 2 ) | + | f ( b ) | } ,
(2.7)

where we have used the fact that

0 1 t 2 ( 1 t ) s d t = 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 t s d t = 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) , 0 1 t s + 2 d t = 0 1 ( 1 t ) s + 2 d t = 1 s + 3 .

This proves inequality (2.5). To prove (2.6), and since | f | is s-convex on [a,b], for any t[0,1], then by (1.1) we have

2 s 1 f ( a + b 2 ) f ( a ) + f ( b ) s + 1 .
(2.8)

Combining (2.7) and (2.8), we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) | f ( a + b 2 ) | + | f ( b ) | } ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) 2 1 s f ( a ) + f ( b ) s + 1 + | f ( b ) | } = [ 1 + ( s + 2 ) 2 1 s ] ( b a ) 2 8 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) { | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | } ,

which proves inequality (2.6), and thus the proof is completed. □

Corollary 1 In Theorem  2, if we choose s=1, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 192 { | f ( a ) | + 6 | f ( a + b 2 ) | + | f ( b ) | } ( b a ) 2 48 { | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | } .
(2.9)

The next theorem gives a new upper bound of the left Hadamard inequality for s-convex mappings.

Theorem 3 Let f:I[0,)R be a differentiable mapping on I such that f L[a,b], where a,bI with a<b. If | f | q is s-convex on [a,b], for some fixed s(0,1] and q>1 with 1 p + 1 q =1, then the following inequality holds:

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 1 q × [ ( | f ( a ) | q + | f ( a + b 2 ) | q ) 1 q + ( | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q ] .
(2.10)

Proof Suppose that p>1. From Lemma 1 and using the Hölder inequality, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 [ 0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | d t + 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | d t ] ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 t 2 p d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q d t ) 1 q + ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 p d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q d t ) 1 q .

Because | f | q is s-convex, we have

0 1 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q dt 1 s + 1 { | f ( a ) | q + | f ( a + b 2 ) | q }

and

0 1 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q dt 1 s + 1 { | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + | f ( b ) | q } .

By a simple computation,

0 1 t 2 p dt= 1 2 p + 1

and

0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 p dt= 0 1 ( 1 t ) 2 p dt= 1 2 p + 1 .

Therefore, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 1 q × [ ( | f ( a ) | q + | f ( a + b 2 ) | q ) 1 q + ( | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q ] .

This completes the proof. □

Corollary 2 Let f:I[0,)R be a differentiable mapping on I such that f L[a,b], where a,bI with a<b. If | f | q is s-convex on [a,b], for some fixed s(0,1] and q>1 with 1 p + 1 q =1, then the following inequality holds:

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 2 q × { 2 1 s q + ( 2 1 s + s + 1 ) 1 q } [ | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | ] .

Proof We consider inequality (2.10), and since | f | q is s-convex on [a,b], then by (1.1) we have

2 s 1 f ( a + b 2 ) f ( a ) + f ( b ) s + 1 .

Therefore

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 2 q × [ ( { 2 1 s + s + 1 } | f ( a ) | q + 2 1 s | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q + ( 2 1 s | f ( a ) | q + { 2 1 s + s + 1 } | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q ] .

We let a 1 =( 2 1 s +s+1)| f (a) | q , b 1 = 2 1 s | f (b) | q , a 2 = 2 1 s | f (a) | q and b 2 =( 2 1 s +s+1)| f (b) | q . Here, 0<1/q<1 for q>1. Using the fact

i = 1 n ( a i + b i ) r i = 1 n a i r + i = 1 n b i r

for 0<r<1, a 1 , a 2 ,, a n 0 and b 1 , b 2 ,, b n 0, we obtain the inequalities

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 2 q × [ ( { 2 1 s + s + 1 } | f ( a ) | q + 2 1 s | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q + ( 2 1 s | f ( a ) | q + { 2 1 s + s + 1 } | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q ] ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p ( 1 s + 1 ) 2 q × { 2 1 s q + ( 2 1 s + s + 1 ) 1 q } [ | f ( a ) | + | f ( b ) | ] .

 □

Theorem 4 Let f:I[0,)R be a differentiable mapping on I such that f L[a,b], where a,bI with a<b. If | f | q , q1 is s-convex on [a,b], for some fixed s(0,1], then the following inequality holds:

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 3 ) 1 p { ( 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( a ) | q + 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q ) 1 q + ( 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q } .

Proof Suppose that p1. From Lemma 1 and using the power mean inequality, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 [ 0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | d t + 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | d t ] ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 t 2 d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q d t ) 1 q + ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q d t ) 1 q .

Because | f | q is s-convex, we have

0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q dt 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f (a) | q + 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q

and

0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q d t 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( b ) | q .

Therefore, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 ( 1 3 ) 1 p { ( 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( a ) | q + 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q ) 1 q + ( 1 s + 3 | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + 2 ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) | f ( b ) | q ) 1 q } .

 □

Corollary 3 In Theorem  4, if we choose s=1, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 48 ( 3 4 ) 1 q { ( | f ( a ) | q 3 + | f ( a + b 2 ) | q ) 1 q + ( | f ( a + b 2 ) | q + | f ( b ) | q 3 ) 1 q } .
(2.11)

Now, we give the following Hadamard-type inequality for s-concave mappings.

Theorem 5 Let f:I[0,)R be a differentiable mapping on I such that f L[a,b], where a,bI with a<b. If | f | q is s-concave on [a,b], for some fixed s(0,1] and q>1 with 1 p + 1 q =1, then the following inequality holds:

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 2 s 1 q ( 2 p + 1 ) 1 / p { | f ( 3 a + b 4 ) | + | f ( a + 3 b 4 ) | } .

Proof From Lemma 1 and using the Hölder inequality for q>1 and 1 p + 1 q =1, we obtain

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 [ 0 1 t 2 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | d t + 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | d t ] ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 t 2 p d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q d t ) 1 q + ( b a ) 2 16 ( 0 1 ( t 1 ) 2 p d t ) 1 p ( 0 1 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q d t ) 1 q .
(2.12)

Since | f | q is s-concave, using inequality (1.1), we have

0 1 | f ( t a + b 2 + ( 1 t ) a ) | q dt 2 s 1 | f ( 3 a + b 4 ) | q
(2.13)

and

0 1 | f ( t b + ( 1 t ) a + b 2 ) | q dt 2 s 1 | f ( a + 3 b 4 ) | q .
(2.14)

From (2.12)-(2.14), we get

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 2 s 1 q ( 2 p + 1 ) 1 / p { | f ( 3 a + b 4 ) | + | f ( a + 3 b 4 ) | } ,

which completes the proof. □

Corollary 4 In Theorem  5, if we choose s=1 and 1 3 < ( 1 2 p + 1 ) 1 p <1, p>1, we have

| f ( a + b 2 ) 1 b a a b f ( x ) d x | ( b a ) 2 16 { | f ( 3 a + b 4 ) | + | f ( a + 3 b 4 ) | } .
(2.15)

3 Applications to special means

We now consider the means for arbitrary real numbers α, β (αβ). We take:

  1. (1)

    Arithmetic mean:

    A(α,β)= α + β 2 ,α,β R + ;
  2. (2)

    Logarithmic mean:

    L(α,β)= α β ln | α | ln | β | ,|α||β|,α,β0,α,β R + ;

Generalized log-mean:

L n (α,β)= [ β n + 1 α n + 1 ( n + 1 ) ( β α ) ] 1 n ,nZ{1,0},α,β R + .

Now, using the results of Section 2, we give some applications to special means of real numbers.

Proposition 1 Let 0<a<b and s(0,1). Then we have

| A s (a,b) L s s (a,b)| | s ( s 1 ) | ( b a ) 2 192 { a s 2 + 6 ( a + b 2 ) s 2 + b s 2 } .

Proof The assertion follows from (2.9) applied to the s-convex function in the second sense f:[0,1][0,1], f(x)= x s . □

Proposition 2 Let 0<a<b and s(0,1). Then we have

| A s ( a , b ) L s s ( a , b ) | | s ( s 1 ) | ( b a ) 2 48 ( 3 4 ) q { [ a q ( s 2 ) 3 + ( a + b 2 ) q ( s 2 ) ] 1 q + [ ( a + b 2 ) q ( s 2 ) + b q ( s 2 ) 3 ] 1 q } .

Proof The assertion follows from (2.11) applied to the s-convex function in the second sense f:[0,1][0,1], f(x)= x s . □

Proposition 3 Let 0<a<b and p>1. Then we have

| A s (a,b) L s s (a,b)| ( b a ) 2 { 1 ( 3 a + b ) 2 + 1 ( a + 3 b ) 2 } .

Proof The inequality follows from (2.15) applied to the concave function in the second sense f:[a;b]R, f(x)=lnx. The details are omitted. □

References

  1. Hudzik H, Maligranda L: Some remarks on s -convex functions. Aequ. Math. 1994, 48: 100–111. 10.1007/BF01837981

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Özdemir ME, Kırmacı US: Two new theorems on mappings uniformly continuous and convex with applications to quadrature rules and means. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 143: 269–274. 10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00359-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dragomir SS, Pearce CEM RGMIA Monographs. In Selected Topics on Hermite-Hadamard Inequalities and Applications. Victoria University, Melbourne; 2000. http://ajmaa.org/RGMIA/monographs.php

    Google Scholar 

  4. Set E, Özdemir ME, Dragomir SS: On the Hermite-Hadamard inequality and other integral inequalities involving two functions. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010., 2010: Article ID 148102

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dragomir SS, Agarwal RP: Two inequalities for differentiable mappings and applications to special means of real numbers and to trapezoidal formula. Appl. Math. Lett. 1998, 11(5):91–95. 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00086-X

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dragomir SS, Fitzpatrick S: The Hadamard’s inequality for s -convex functions in the second sense. Demonstr. Math. 1999, 32(4):687–696.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pečarić JE, Proschan F, Tong YL: Convex Functions, Partial Orderings, and Statistical Applications. Academic Press, Boston; 1992:137.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kırmacı US, Bakula MK, Özdemir ME, Pečarić J: Hadamard-type inequalities for s -convex functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 193: 26–35. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.03.030

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Alomari M, Darus M: Hadamard-type inequalities for s -convex functions. Int. Math. Forum 2008, 3(40):1965–1975.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Alomari M, Darus M: The Hadamard’s inequality for s -convex functions of 2-variables. Int. J. Math. Anal. 2008, 2(13):629–638.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain S, Bhatti MI, Iqbal M: Hadamard-type inequalities for s -convex functions. Punjab Univ. J. Math. 2009, 41: 51–60.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Avci M, Kavurmaci H, Özdemir ME: New inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type via s -convex functions in the second sense with applications. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217: 5171–5176. 10.1016/j.amc.2010.11.047

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarikaya MZ, Set E, Özdemir ME: On new inequalities of Simpson’s type for s -convex functions. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 60: 2191–2199. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.07.033

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Çetin Yıldız.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ÇY, AOA and ES carried out the design of the study and performed the analysis. MEÖ participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özdemir, M.E., Yıldız, Ç., Akdemir, A.O. et al. On some inequalities for s-convex functions and applications. J Inequal Appl 2013, 333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-333

Keywords