Skip to main content

Chen-like inequalities on lightlike hypersurfaces of a Lorentzian manifold

Abstract

We introduce k-Ricci curvature and k-scalar curvature on lightlike hypersurfaces of a Lorentzian manifold. We establish some inequalities between the extrinsic scalar curvature and the intrinsic scalar curvature. Using these inequalities, we obtain some characterizations on lightlike hypersurfaces. We give some results with regard to curvature invariants and S( n 1 ,, n k )-spaces for lightlike hypersurfaces of a Lorentzian manifold.

1 Introduction

In 1873, Schläfli conjectured that every Riemann manifold could be locally considered as a submanifold of an Euclidean space with sufficient high codimension. This was proven by Janet in [1], Cartan in [2]. Friedmann extended the theorem to semi-Riemannian manifolds in [3]. Chen gave a relation between the sectional curvature and the shape operator for an n-dimensional submanifold M in a Riemannian space form R m ( c ¯ ) in [4] as follows:

A N > n 1 n (c c ¯ ) I n ,
(1.1)

where A N is a shape operator of M, c=infK c ¯ and I n is an identity map. Also, Chen established a sharp inequality between the main intrinsic curvatures (the sectional curvature and the scalar curvature) and the main extrinsic curvatures (the squared mean curvature) for a submanifold in a real space form R m ( c ¯ ) in [5] as follows:

For each unit tangent vector X T p M n ,

H 2 (p) 4 n 2 { Ric ( X ) ( n 1 ) c ¯ } ,
(1.2)

where H 2 is the squared mean curvature and Ric(X) is Ricci curvature of M n at X.

In [6], Hong and Tripathi presented a general inequality for submanifolds of a Riemannian manifold by using (1.2). In [7], this inequality was named Chen-Ricci inequality by Tripathi.

In [8] and [9], Chen introduced a Riemannian invariant δ( n 1 ,, n k ) by

δ( n 1 ,, n k )=τ(p)inf { τ π 1 ( p ) + + τ π k ( p ) } ,
(1.3)

where τ(p) is scalar curvature of M, τ π j (p) is j-scalar curvature, π 1 ,, π k run over all k mutually orthogonal subspaces of T p M such that dim π j = n j , j=1,,k. In [10], the authors gave optimal relationships among invariant δ( n 1 ,, n k ), the intrinsic curvatures and the extrinsic curvatures.

Later, Chen and some authors found inequalities for submanifolds of different spaces. For example, these inequalities were studied at submanifolds of complex space forms in [1113]. Contact versions of Chen inequalities and their applications were introduced in [7, 1416]. In [17], Tripathi investigated these inequalities in curvature-like tensors. Furthermore, Haesen presented an optimal inequality for an m-dimensional Lorentzian manifold embedded as a hypersurface on an (m+1)-dimensional Ricci-flat space in [18]. The authors in [19] proved an inequality using the extrinsic and the intrinsic scalar curvature in a semi-Riemannian manifold. In [20], Chen introduced space-like submanifolds (Riemannian submanifolds) of a semi-Riemannian manifold.

As far as we know, there is no paper about Chen-like inequalities and curvature invariants in lightlike geometry. So, we introduce k-plane Ricci curvature and k-plane scalar curvature of a lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold. Using these curvatures, we establish some inequalities and by means of these inequalities, we give some characterizations of a lightlike hypersurface on a Lorentzian manifold. Finally, we introduce the curvature invariant δ( n 1 ,, n k ) on lightlike hypersurfaces of a Lorentzian manifold.

2 Preliminaries

Let ( M ˜ , g ˜ ) be an (n+2)-dimensional semi-Riemannian manifold and M be a lightlike hypersurface of M ˜ . The radical space or the null space of T p M, at each point pM, is a one-dimensional subspace Rad T p M defined by

Rad T p M= { ξ T p M : g p ( ξ , X ) = 0 , X T p M } .
(2.1)

The complementary vector bundle S(TM) of RadTM in TM is called the screen bundle of M. We note that any screen bundle is non-degenerate. Thus, we have

TM=RadTMS(TM),
(2.2)

where denotes the orthogonal direct sum. The complementary vector bundle S ( T M ) of S(TM) is called screen transversal bundle and it has rank 2. Since RadTM is a lightlike subbundle of S ( T M ) , there exists a unique local section N of S ( T M ) such that

g ˜ (N,N)=0, g ˜ (N,ξ)=1.
(2.3)

The Gauss and Weingarten formulas are given, respectively, by

˜ X Y = X Y + h ( X , Y ) , ˜ X N = A N X + X t N
(2.4)

for any X,YΓ(TM), where X Y, A N XΓ(TM) and h(X,Y), X t NΓ(ltr(TM)). If we put B(X,Y)= g ˜ (h(X,Y),ξ) and τ(X)= g ˜ ( X t N,ξ), then (2.4) become

˜ X Y = X Y + B ( X , Y ) N , ˜ X N = A N X + τ ( X ) N ,
(2.5)

where B and A N are called the second fundamental form and the shape operator of the lightlike hypersurface M. The induced connection on M is not metric connection but is torsion free [21].

If B=0, then the lightlike hypersurface M is called totally geodesic in M ˜ . A point pM is said to be umbilical if

B ( X , Y ) p =H g p (X,Y),X,Y T p M,

where HR. M is called totally umbilical in M ˜ if every point of M is umbilical [21].

The mean curvature μ of M with respect to an { e 1 ,, e n } orthonormal basis of Γ(S(TM)) is defined in [22] as follows:

μ= tr ( B ) n = 1 n i = 1 n ε i B( e i , e i ),g( e i , e i )= ε i .
(2.6)

Let P be a projection of S(TM) on M. From (2.2), we have

X P Y = X P Y + h ( X , P Y ) = X Y + C ( X , P Y ) ξ , X , Y Γ ( T M ) ,
(2.7)
X ξ = A ξ X τ ( X ) ξ ,
(2.8)

where X PY and A ξ X belong to Γ(S(TM)). Here , C and A ξ are called the induced connection, the local second fundamental form and the local shape operator on S(TM), respectively.

From (2.5) and (2.7) one has

B(X,Y)=g ( A ξ X , Y ) ,
(2.9)
C(X,PY)=g( A N X,PY).
(2.10)

Using (2.9) we have

B(X,ξ)=0,XΓ(TM | U ).

A lightlike hypersurface (M,g) of a semi-Riemannian manifold ( M ˜ , g ˜ ) is called screen locally conformal if the shape operators A N and A ξ of M and S(TM), respectively, are related by

A N =φ A ξ ,
(2.11)

where φ is a non-vanishing smooth function on a neighborhood U on M [23]. In particular, M is called screen homothetic if φ is a non-zero constant.

We denote the Riemann curvature tensors of M ˜ and M by R ˜ and R, respectively. The Gauss-Codazzi type equations for M are given as follows:

g ˜ ( R ˜ ( X , Y ) Z , P U ) = g ( R ( X , Y ) Z , P U ) + B ( X , Z ) C ( Y , P U ) B ( Y , Z ) C ( X , P U ) ,
(2.12)
g ˜ ( R ˜ ( X , Y ) Z , ξ ) = ( X B ) ( Y , Z ) ( Y B ) ( X , Z ) + B ( Y , Z ) τ ( X ) B ( X , Z ) τ ( Y ) ,
(2.13)
g ˜ ( R ˜ ( X , Y ) Z , N ) = g ( R ( X , Y ) Z , N ) ,
(2.14)
g ˜ ( R ˜ ( X , Y ) P Z , N ) = ( X C ) ( Y , P Z ) ( Y C ) ( X , P Z ) + τ ( Y ) C ( X , P Z ) τ ( X ) C ( Y , P Z )
(2.15)

for any X,Y,Z,UΓ(TM) [21].

Let pM and Π=sp{ e i , e j } be a two-dimensional non-degenerate plane of T p M. The number

K i j = g ( R ( e j , e i ) e i , e j ) g ( e i , e i ) g ( e j , e j ) g ( e i , e j ) 2

is called the sectional curvature at pM. Since the screen second fundamental form C is not symmetric, the sectional curvature K i j of a lightlike submanifold is not symmetric, that is, K i j K j i .

Let pM and ξ be a null vector of T p M. A plane Π of T p M is called a null plane if it contains ξ and e i such that g ˜ (ξ, e i )=0 and g ˜ ( e i , e i )0. The null sectional curvature of Π is given in [24] as follows:

K i null = g ( R p ( e i , ξ ) ξ , e i ) g p ( e i , e i ) .

The Ricci tensor Ric ˜ of M ˜ and the induced Ricci type tensor R ( 0 , 2 ) of M are defined by

Ric ˜ ( X , Y ) = trace { Z R ˜ ( Z , X ) Y } , X , Y Γ ( T M ˜ ) , R ( 0 , 2 ) ( X , Y ) = trace { Z R ( Z , X ) Y } , X , Y Γ ( T M ) .
(2.16)

Let { e 1 ,, e n } be an orthonormal frame of Γ(S(TM)). In this case,

R ( 0 , 2 ) (X,Y)= j = 1 n ε j g ( R ( e j , X ) Y , e j ) + g ˜ ( R ( ξ , X ) Y , N ) ,
(2.17)

where ε j denotes the causal character (1) of a vector field e j . Ricci curvature of a lightlike hypersurface is not symmetric. Thus, Einstein hypersurfaces are not defined on any lightlike hypersurface. If M admits that an induced symmetric Ricci tensor Ric and Ricci tensor satisfy

Ric(X,Y)=kg(X,Y),X,YΓ(TM),
(2.18)

where k is a constant, then M is called an Einstein hypersurface [23].

Let M be a lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ , replacing X by ξ and using (2.12), (2.13) and (2.14)

R ( 0 , 2 ) ( ξ , ξ ) = j = 1 n g ( R ( e j , ξ ) ξ , e j ) g ˜ ( R ( ξ , ξ ) ξ , N ) = j = 1 n K j null .
(2.19)

Thus, we have

i = 1 n R ( 0 , 2 ) ( e i , e i )= i = 1 n { j = 1 n g ( R ( e j , e i ) e i , e j ) } + i = 1 n g ˜ ( R ( ξ , e i ) e i , N ) .
(2.20)

Adding (2.19) and (2.20), we obtain a scalar τ given as follows [25]:

τ = R ( 0 , 2 ) ( ξ , ξ ) + i = 1 n R ( 0 , 2 ) ( e i , e i ) = i , j = 1 n K i j + i = 1 n K i null + K i N ,
(2.21)

where K i N = g ˜ (R(ξ, e i ) e i ,N) for i{1,,n}.

3 k-Ricci curvature and k-scalar curvature

Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ and let { e 1 ,, e n ,ξ} be a basis of Γ(TM) where { e 1 ,, e n } is an orthonormal basis of Γ(S(TM)). For kn, we set π k , ξ =sp{ e 1 ,, e k ,ξ} is a (k+1)-dimensional degenerate plane section and π k =sp{ e 1 ,, e k } is a k-dimensional non-degenerate plane section.

We say that k-degenerate Ricci curvature and k-Ricci curvature at unit vector XΓ(TM) are as follows:

Ric π k , ξ (X)= R ( 0 , 2 ) (X,X)= j = 1 k g ( R ( e j , X ) X , e j ) + g ˜ ( R ( ξ , X ) X , N ) ,
(3.1)
Ric π k (X)= R ( 0 , 2 ) (X,X)= j = 1 k g ( R ( e j , X ) X , e j ) ,
(3.2)

respectively. Furthermore, we say that k-degenerate scalar curvature and k-scalar curvature at pM are as follows:

τ π k , ξ (p)= i , j = 1 k K i j + i = 1 k K i null + K i N ,
(3.3)
τ π k (p)= i , j = 1 k K i j ,
(3.4)

respectively. For k=2, Π 1 , ξ =sp{ e 1 ,ξ}, then we have

Ric Π 1 , ξ ( e 1 )= K 1 N ,

and

τ Π 2 (p)= K 1 null + K 1 N .

For k=n, π n =sp{ e 1 ,, e n }=Γ(S(TM)), then

Ric S ( T M ) ( e 1 )= Ric π n ( e 1 )= j = 1 n K 1 j = K 12 ++ K 1 n ,
(3.5)

and

τ S ( T M ) (p)= i , j = 1 n K i j .
(3.6)

We say that screen Ricci curvature and screen scalar curvature are Ric S ( T M ) ( e 1 ) and τ S ( T M ) (p), respectively. From (2.12) we can write

τ S ( T M ) (p)= τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+ i , j = 1 n B i i C j j B i j C j i ,
(3.7)

where B i j =B( e i , e j ) and C i j =C( e i , e j ) for i,j{1,,n}.

Also, the components of the second fundamental form B and the screen second fundamental form C satisfy

i , j = 1 n B i j C j i = 1 2 { i , j = 1 n ( B i j + C j i ) 2 i , j = 1 n ( B i j ) 2 + ( C j i ) 2 } ,
(3.8)

and

i , j B i i C j j = 1 2 { ( i , j B i i + C j j ) 2 ( i B i i ) 2 ( j C j j ) 2 } .
(3.9)

Theorem 3.1 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then:

  1. (a)
    τ S ( T M ) (p) τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+nμ(trace A N )+ 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 .
    (3.10)

The equality holds for all pM if and only if either M is a screen homothetic lightlike hypersurface with φ=1 or M is a totally geodesic lightlike hypersurface.

  1. (b)
    τ S ( T M ) (p) τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+nμ(trace A N ) 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 .
    (3.11)

The equality holds for all pM if and only if either M is a screen homothetic lightlike hypersurface with φ=1 or M is a totally geodesic lightlike hypersurface.

  1. (c)

    The equalities case of (3.10) and (3.11) hold at pM if and only if p is a totally geodesic point.

Proof Using (3.7) and (3.8), we get

τ S ( T M ) (p)= τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+ i , j = 1 n B i i C j j 1 2 i , j = 1 n ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 2 i , j = 1 n ( B i j ) 2 + ( C j i ) 2 .
(3.12)

Since

1 2 ( B i j 2 + C j i 2 ) = 1 4 ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,

then

1 2 { i , j = 1 n ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + i , j = 1 n ( B i j ) 2 + ( C j i ) 2 } = 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 .
(3.13)

If we put (3.13) in (3.12), we obtain

τ S ( T M ) (p)= τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+ i , j = 1 n B i i C j j 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,
(3.14)

which yields (3.10) and (3.11). From (3.10), (3.11) and (3.14) it is easy to get (a), (b) and (c) statements. □

Corollary 3.2 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian space form M ˜ (c). Then:

  1. (a)
    τ S ( T M ) (p)n(n1)c+nμ(trace A N )+ 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 .
    (3.15)
  2. (b)
    τ S ( T M ) (p)n(n1)c+nμ(trace A N ) 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 .
    (3.16)

Corollary 3.3 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional screen homothetic lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian space form M ˜ (c). Then:

  1. (a)
    τ S ( T M ) (p)n(n1)c+φ n 2 μ 2 + ( φ 1 ) 4 i , j ( B i j ) 2 .
    (3.17)
  2. (b)
    τ S ( T M ) (p)n(n1)c+φ n 2 μ 2 ( φ 1 ) 2 i , j ( B i j ) 2 .
    (3.18)

Theorem 3.4 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + 1 2 ( trace A ¯ ) 2 1 2 ( trace A N ) 2 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,
(3.19)

where

A ¯ = ( B 11 + C 11 B 12 + C 21 B 1 n + C n 1 B 21 + C 12 B 22 + C 22 B 2 n + C n 2 B n 1 + C 1 n B n 2 + C 2 n B n n + C n n ) .
(3.20)

The equality of (3.19) holds for all pM if and only if M is minimal.

Proof From (3.14) and (3.9) we get

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) = τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + 1 2 { ( i , j B i i + C j j ) 2 ( i B i i ) 2 ( j C j j ) 2 } 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,
(3.21)

which implies (3.19).

The equality of (3.19) satisfies then

i B i i =0.
(3.22)

This shows that M is minimal. □

By Theorem 3.4 we get the following corollaries.

Corollary 3.5 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian space form M ˜ (c). Then

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) n ( n 1 ) c + 1 2 ( trace A ¯ ) 2 1 2 ( trace A N ) 2 1 2 i , j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,
(3.23)

where A ¯ is equal to (3.20). The equality of (3.23) holds for all pM if and only if M is minimal.

Corollary 3.6 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional screen homothetic lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then

τ S ( T M ) (p) τ ˜ S ( T M ) (p)+ ( 2 φ + 1 ) 2 n 2 μ 2 ( φ 2 + 6 φ + 1 ) 4 i , j ( B i j ) 2 .
(3.24)

The equality of (3.24) holds for all pM if and only if M is minimal.

Now, we shall need the following lemma.

Lemma 3.7 [26]

If a 1 ,, a n are n-real numbers (n>1), then

1 n ( i = 1 n a i ) 2 i = 1 n a i 2 ,
(3.25)

with equality if and only if a 1 == a n .

Theorem 3.8 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional (n>1) lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + n 1 2 n ( trace A ¯ ) 2 1 2 { ( trace A N ) 2 + n 2 μ 2 } + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 1 2 i j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 ,
(3.26)

where A ¯ is equal to (3.20).

The equality case of (3.26) holds for all pM if and only if nμ=trace A N .

Proof From (3.21)

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) = τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + 1 2 { ( trace A ¯ ) 2 ( trace A N ) 2 n 2 μ 2 } 1 2 i ( B i i + C i i ) 2 1 2 i j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 .
(3.27)

Using Lemma 3.7 and equality (3.27), we have

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + 1 2 { ( trace A ¯ ) 2 ( trace A N ) 2 n 2 μ 2 } 1 2 n ( i B i i + C i i ) 2 1 2 i j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 ,
(3.28)

which implies (3.26).

The equality case of (3.26) satisfies then

B 11 + C 11 == B n n + C n n .
(3.29)

From (3.29) we get

( 1 n ) B 11 + B 22 + + B n n + ( 1 n ) C 11 + C 22 + + C n n = 0 , B 11 + ( 1 n ) B 22 + + B n n + C 11 + ( 1 n ) C 22 + + C n n = 0 , B 11 + B 22 + + ( 1 n ) B n n + C 11 + C 22 + + ( 1 n ) C n n = 0 .

By the above equations, we obtain

( n 1 ) 2 (trace A N +nμ)=0.
(3.30)

Since n1, nμ=trace A N . □

From Theorem 3.8 we get the following corollaries.

Corollary 3.9 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional (n>1) lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian space form M ˜ (c). Then

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) n ( n 1 ) c + n 1 2 n ( trace A ¯ ) 2 1 2 { n 2 μ 2 + ( trace A N ) 2 } + 1 4 i , j ( B i j C j i ) 2 1 2 i j ( B i j + C j i ) 2 ,
(3.31)

where A ¯ is equal to (3.20).

The equality case of (3.31) holds for all pM if and only if nμ=trace A N .

Corollary 3.10 Let M be an (n+1)-dimensional (n>1) screen homothetic lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then

τ S ( T M ) ( p ) τ ˜ S ( T M ) ( p ) + φ n 2 μ 2 ( φ + 1 ) 2 2 n μ 2 + ( φ 1 ) 2 4 i ( B i i ) 2 ( φ 2 + 6 φ + 1 ) 4 i j ( B i j ) 2 .
(3.32)

The equality case of (3.32) holds for all pM if and only if either φ=1 or M is minimal.

4 Curvature invariants on lightlike hypersurfaces

Definition 4.1 For an integer k0, let S(n,k) be the finite set which consists of k-tuples ( n 1 ,, n k ) of integers ≥2 satisfying n 1 <n and n 1 ++ n k n. Denote by S(n) the set of all unordered k-tuples with k0 for a fixed positive integer n.

For each k-tuple ( n 1 ,, n k )S(n), the two sequences of curvature invariants S( n 1 ,, n k )(p) and S ˆ ( n 1 ,, n k )(p) are defined by, respectively,

S ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) = inf { τ ( Π n 1 ) + + τ ( Π n k ) } , S ˆ ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) = sup { τ ( Π n 1 ) + + τ ( Π n k ) } ,

where Π n 1 ,, Π n k are k-dimensional mutually orthogonal subspaces of T p M such that dim Π n j = n j , j=1,,k.

δ ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) = τ ( p ) S ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) , δ ˆ ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) = τ ( p ) S ˆ ( n 1 , , n k ) ( p ) .

We call a lightlike hypersurface an S( n 1 ,, n k ) space if it satisfies S( n 1 ,, n k )= S ˆ ( n 1 ,, n k ).

Theorem 4.2 Let M be a lightlike hypersurface of an (n+2)-dimensional Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Then M is an S(n) space if and only if the scalar curvature of M is constant.

Proof Let { e 1 ,, e n } be an orthonormal frame of Γ(S(TM)). Let us choose n-dimensional plane sections such that

π n 1 , ξ 1 = sp { e 2 , , e n , ξ } T p M , π n 1 , ξ n = sp { e 1 , , e n 1 , ξ } T p M , π n = sp { e 1 , , e n } T p M .

Thus, from (3.3) and (3.4), we obtain

τ π n 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) = i , j = 2 n K i j + K i null + K i N , τ π n 1 , ξ n ( p ) = i , j = 1 n 1 K i j + K i null + K i N , τ π n ( p ) = i , j = 1 n K i j = τ S ( T M ) ( p ) .

If M is an S(n) space, then we can write

τ π n 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e 1 ) K 1 null = c , τ π n 1 , ξ n ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e n ) K n null = c , τ π n ( p ) = τ ( p ) i = 1 n K i null + K i N = c .

Therefore, we have

Ric( e 1 )+ K 1 null ==Ric( e n )+ K n null = i = 1 n K i null + K i N .
(4.1)

From (4.1) we get

Ric S ( T M ) ( e 1 )++ Ric S ( T M ) ( e n )=(n1) i = 1 n K i null + K i N .
(4.2)

Using (4.2) we have

τ S ( T M ) (p)=(n1) ( τ ( p ) τ S ( T M ) ( p ) ) .

Thus, we obtain

τ(p)= ( 2 n 1 n ) c,
(4.3)

which shows that τ(p) is constant, which completes the proof. □

Remark 4.3 We note that if an n-dimensional non-degenerate manifold is an S(n) space, then it is an Einstein space (see [10]). On the other hand, if a degenerate hypersurface of a lightlike hypersurface is an S(n) space, then it has constant scalar curvature. Thus, the curvature invariants on degenerate submanifolds give different characterizations from the curvature invariants on non-degenerate submanifolds.

Keeping in view (4.2), we get the following corollary immediately.

Corollary 4.4 Let M(c) be an n-dimensional lightlike hypersurface with constant sectional curvature c. M(c) is an S(n) space if and only if i = 1 n K i N =0.

Now, we prove the following.

Theorem 4.5 Let M be a lightlike hypersurface of an (n+2)-dimensional Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . If M is an S(j) space for 2j<n, then M is also S(j+1) space.

Proof For the proof of the theorem, we use the induction method. Firstly, we show that the claim of the theorem is true for j=2. Suppose that M is an S(2) space. Let us choose any two-dimensional plane sections of T p M as Π 1 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 1 ,ξ}, Π 2 ={ e 1 , e 2 }, Π 1 , ξ 2 =sp{ e 2 ,ξ}. In that case,

τ Π 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) = K 1 null + K 1 N = c , τ Π 2 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 = c , τ Π 1 , ξ 2 ( p ) = K 2 null + K 2 N = c .

Now, let us choose three-dimensional plane sections of T p M as π 3 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 , e 3 }, π 2 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,ξ}. If we show that τ π 2 , ξ 1 (p)= τ π 3 (p)=constant, then M is an S(3)-space

τ π 2 , ξ 1 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 + i = 1 2 K i null + K i N = 3 c ,

and

τ π 3 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 + K 13 + K 31 + K 23 + K 32 = 3 c .

Therefore, M is an S(3) space.

Now, we show that the claim of the theorem is true for n=k.

Let us choose any k-dimensional plane sections of T p M as π k 1 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 2 , e 3 ,, e k ,ξ}, π k 1 , ξ 2 =sp{ e 1 , e 3 ,, e k ,ξ}, …, π k 1 , ξ k =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,, e k 1 ,ξ}, π k =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,, e k }. Then

τ π k 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) = i , j = 2 k K i j + i = 2 k K i null + K i N , τ π k 1 , ξ k ( p ) = i , j = 1 k 1 K i j + i = 1 k 1 K i null + K i N , τ π k ( p ) = i , j = 1 k K i j .

From the above equations, we have

i = 1 k K i null + K i N = 2 c k 1 .

Let us choose (k+1)-dimensional plane sections of T p M as π k , ξ =sp{ e 1 ,, e k ,ξ}, π k + 1 =sp{ e 1 ,, e k , e k + 1 }, then

τ π k , ξ ( p ) = i , j = 1 K i j + i = 1 k K i null + K i N = c + 2 c k 1 = ( k + 1 k 1 ) c .
(4.4)

Using in a similar way a special case j=2, we obtain

τ π k + 1 (p)= ( k + 1 k 1 ) c.
(4.5)

From (4.4) and (4.5) M is an S(k+1) space. □

Theorem 4.6 Let M be a lightlike hypersurface of an (n+2)-dimensional Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . Let { e 1 ,, e n ,ξ} be an orthonormal basis of pM. If M is an S(n1) space, then Ric( e 1 )==Ric( e n )=constant and K 1 null == K n null .

Proof Let M be an S(n1) space and π n 2 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 2 ,, e n 1 ,ξ}, π n 2 , ξ 2 =sp{ e 1 , e 3 ,, e n 1 ,ξ},…, π n 2 , ξ n 1 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,, e n 2 ,ξ}, π n 1 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,, e n 1 } be (n1)-dimensional plane sections of T p M. Then

τ π n 2 , ξ 1 ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e 1 ) Ric ( e n ) K 1 null K n null = c , τ π n 2 , ξ 2 ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e 2 ) Ric ( e n ) K 1 null K n null = c , τ π n 2 , ξ n 1 ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e n 1 ) Ric ( e n ) K n 1 null K n null = c , τ π n 1 ( p ) = τ ( p ) Ric ( e n ) i = 1 n K i null + K i N = c .

If we sum the above equations side to side and take into consideration Theorem 4.5, we have

Ric( e 1 )++Ric( e n )+(n1)Ric( e n )+ i = 1 n K i null + i = 1 n 1 K i null + K i N =constant.

Therefore, we obtain

Ric S ( T M ) ( e 1 ) + + Ric S ( T M ) ( e n ) + ( n 1 ) Ric ( e n ) + i = 1 n K i null + K i N + i = 1 n 1 K i null + K i N = constant .

Taking into account upper equations, we get

τ S ( T M ) (p)+(n1)Ric( e n )+τ(p) τ S ( T M ) (p)+ τ π n 1 , ξ (p) τ π n 1 (p)=constant,

where π n 1 , ξ =sp{ e 1 ,, e n 1 ,ξ} and π n 1 =sp{ e 1 ,, e n 1 }. Using Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 4.5, we obtain Ric( e n )=constant. In addition to this, from (4.1), Theorem 4.2 and Theorem 4.5, we have K 1 null == K n null , which completes the proof of the theorem. □

In [25], Duggal restricted a lightlike hypersurface M (labeled by M 0 ) of genus zero with screen distribution S ( T M ) 0 . He denoted this type of a lightlike hypersurface by C[ M 0 ]=[( M 0 , g 0 ,S ( T M ) 0 )] a class of lightlike hypersurfaces of genus zero such that

  1. (a)

    M 0 admits a canonical screen distribution S ( T M ) 0 that induces a canonical lightlike transversal vector bundle N 0 ,

  2. (b)

    M 0 admits an induced symmetric Ricci tensor, denoted by Ric0.

From above information, we get the following theorem immediately.

Theorem 4.7 Let M 0 , a member of C[ M 0 ], be an (2n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ . If M 0 is an Einstein hypersurface, then

τ π n , ξ (p) τ π n , ξ (p)= i = 1 n K i null i = n + 1 2 n K i null ,
(4.6)

where π n , ξ is any (n+1)-dimensional null section of T p M 0 and π n , ξ denotes the orthogonal complement π n , ξ in T p M 0 .

Proof Let us choose an orthonormal basis { e 1 ,, e 2 n } at p such that π n , ξ is spanned by { e 1 ,, e n ,ξ}. If M 0 is an Einstein hypersurface, then the Ricci curvature of M 0 satisfies

Ric( e 1 )++Ric( e n )=Ric( e n + 1 )++Ric( e 2 n ).

From (2.17) we have

i = 1 n j = 1 2 n K i j + i = 1 n K i N = i = n + 1 2 n j = 1 2 n K i j + i = n + 1 2 n K i N ,

so, we get

i , j = 1 n K i j + i = 1 n K i N = i , j = n + 1 n K i j + i = n + 1 n K i N ,

which is equivalent to (4.6). □

Now, we introduce these invariants as some special cases, and we get interesting characterizations on lightlike hypersurfaces as follows.

Theorem 4.8 Let M be an S( n 1 , n 1 )-space. Then:

  1. (a)

    If n 1 =2, then M is an S(3)-space.

  2. (b)

    If n 1 2, then M is not necessary an S( n 1 +1)-space. If

    i = 1 n 1 K i null + K i N =constant,

then M is an S( n 1 +1)-space.

Proof (a) n 1 =2, let us choose any two-dimensional plane sections of T p M as Π 1 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 1 ,ξ}, Π 1 , ξ 2 =sp{ e 2 ,ξ}, Π 2 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 }. Then

τ Π 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) = K 1 null + K 1 N , τ Π 1 , ξ 2 ( p ) = K 2 null + K 2 N , τ Π 2 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 .

If M is an S(2,2) space, then

τ Π 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) + τ Π 1 , ξ 2 ( p ) = i = 1 2 K i null + K i N = c , τ Π 1 , ξ 1 ( p ) + τ Π 2 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 + K 1 null + K 1 N = c , τ Π 1 , ξ 2 ( p ) + τ Π 2 ( p ) = K 12 + K 21 + K 2 null + K 2 N = c .

From the above equations, we have

τ π 2 , ξ (p)= 3 c 2 ,
(4.7)

where π 2 , ξ =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,ξ} is a three-dimensional null plane section of T p M.

Now, let us choose any two-dimensional plane sections of T p M as Π 2 1 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 }, Π 2 2 =sp{ e 1 , e 3 }, Π 2 3 =sp{ e 2 , e 3 }. Since M is an S(2,2)-space, we can write

K 12 + K 21 + K 13 + K 31 + K 23 + K 32 + K 12 + K 21 + K 13 + K 31 + K 23 + K 32 =2τ( π 3 )=3c.

Therefore,

τ( π 4 )= 3 c 2 ,
(4.8)

where π 3 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 , e 3 } is a three-dimensional non-degenerate plane section of T p M. From (4.7) and (4.8) we see that M is an S(3)-space.

  1. (b)

    We show that the claim of the theorem is true for n 1 =3. Let us choose any three-dimensional plane section of T p M as π 2 , ξ 1 =sp{ e 1 , e 2 ,ξ}, π 2 , ξ 2 =sp{ e 2 , e 3 ,ξ}, π 2 , ξ 3 =sp{ e 1 , e 3 ,ξ}. If M is an S(3,3)-space, then

    3 c = 2 ( τ π 2 , ξ 1 ( p ) + τ π 2 , ξ 2 ( p ) + τ π 2 , ξ 3 ( p ) ) = 2 τ π 3 , ξ ( p ) + 2 i = 1 3 K i null + K i N ,
    (4.9)

where π 3 , ξ =sp{ e 1 , e 2 , e 3 ,ξ} T p M. Consider (4.9), we obtain the proof of (b) condition is true. □

The proof of a general case has been seen using the same way as the special case n 1 =3.

Theorem 4.9 Let M be a (2n+1)-dimensional lightlike hypersurface of a Lorentzian manifold M ˜ .

  1. (a)

    If inf{τ( π n )+τ( π n + 1 )}>0, then τ(p)>0.

  2. (b)

    If sup{τ( π n )+τ( π n + 1 )}<0, then τ(p)<0.

Proof Let T p M=sp{ e 1 ,, e 2 n ,ξ}. We suppose that inf{τ( π n )+τ( π n + 1 )}>0. By straightforward computation, we have

C(2n2,n2)+C(2n2,n) τ S ( T M ) (p)+C(2n1,n1) i = 1 2 n K i null + K i N >0,
(4.10)

and

C(2n2,n3)+C(2n2,n1) τ S ( T M ) (p)+C(2n,n) i = 1 2 n K i null + K i N >0.
(4.11)

Summing up (4.10) and (4.11), we get

C(2n,n) τ S ( T M ) (p)+C(2n,n) i = 1 2 n K i null + K i N >0,
(4.12)

which shows that C(2n,n)τ(p)>0. Therefore, τ(p)>0 which is a proof of the statement (a).

Now, we suppose that sup{τ( π n )+τ( π n + 1 )}>0. Following a similar way in the proof of statement (a), we have

C(2n,n) τ S ( T M ) (p)+C(2n,n) i = 1 2 n K i null + K i N <0,
(4.13)

which shows that C(2n,n)τ(p)<0. Therefore τ(p)<0, which is a proof of the statement (b). □

References

  1. Janet M: Sur la possibilité de plonger un espace Riemannian donné dans un espace Euclidien. Ann. Soc. Pol. Math. 1926, 5: 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cartan E: Sur la possibilité de plonger un espace Riemannian donné dans un espace Euclidien. Ann. Soc. Pol. Math. 1927, 5: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman A: Isometric embedding of Riemannian manifolds into Euclidean spaces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1965, 37: 201–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen BY: Mean curvature and shape operator of isometric immersions in real space forms. Glasg. Math. J. 1996, 38: 87–97. 10.1017/S001708950003130X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen BY: Relations between Ricci curvature and shape operator for submanifolds with arbitrary codimension. Glasg. Math. J. 1999, 41: 33–41. 10.1017/S0017089599970271

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong S, Tripathi MM: On Ricci curvature of submanifolds. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. Sci. 2005, 2: 227–245.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Tripathi MM: Chen-Ricci inequality for submanifolds of contact metric manifolds. J. Adv. Math. Stud. 2008, 1: 111–134.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen BY: Some pinching and classification theorems for minimal submanifolds. Arch. Math. 1993, 60: 568–578. 10.1007/BF01236084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen BY: A Riemannian invariant and its applications to submanifold theory. Results Math. 1995, 27: 17–26. 10.1007/BF03322265

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen BY, Dillen F, Verstraelen L, Vrancken V: Characterizations of Riemannian space forms, Einstein spaces and conformally flat spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2000, 128: 589–598. 10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05332-0

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JS, Song YM, Tripathi MM: Shape operator for slant submanifolds in generalized complex space form. Indian J. Pure Appl. Math. 2003, 34(8):1153–1163.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto K, Mihai I, Oiagǎ A: Shape operator for slant submanifolds in complex space forms. Bull. Yamagata Univ. Nat. Sci. 2000, 14: 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mihai A: B.Y. Chen inequalities for slant submanifolds in generalized complex space forms. Rad. Mat. 2004, 12: 215–231.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cioroboiu D, Oiagǎ A: B.Y. Chen inequalities for slant submanifolds in Sasakian space forms. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 2003, 52: 367–381. 10.1007/BF02872761

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim YH, Lee CW, Yoon DW: Shape operator of slant submanifolds in Sasakian space forms. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2003, 40: 63–76.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Zhou J: On Ricci curvature of certain submanifolds in a cosymplectic space form. Sarajevo J. Math. 2006, 2: 95–106.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Tripathi MM: Improved Chen-Ricci inequality for curvature-like tensors and its applications. Differ. Geom. Appl. 2011, 29: 685–698. 10.1016/j.difgeo.2011.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haesen S: Optimal inequalities for embedded space-times. Kragujev. J. Math. 2005, 28: 69–85.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Dillen F, Haesen S, Miroslava PT, Verstraelen L: An inequality between intrinsic and extrinsic curvature invariants for codimension 2 embeddings. J. Geom. Phys. 2004, 52: 101–112. 10.1016/j.geomphys.2004.02.003

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen BY: Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry, δ-Invariants and Applications. World Scientific, Singapore; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Duggal KL, Bejancu A: Lightlike Submanifolds of Semi-Riemannian Manifolds and Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Bejan CL, Duggal KL: Global lightlike manifolds and harmonicity. Kodai Math. J. 2005, 28: 131–145. 10.2996/kmj/1111588042

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Duggal KL, Sahin B: Differential Geometry of Lightlike Submanifolds. Birkhäuser, Basel; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Beem JK, Ehrlich PE, Easley KL: Global Lorentzian Geometry. 2nd edition. Dekker, New York; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Duggal KL: On scalar curvature in lightlike geometry. J. Geom. Phys. 2007, 57: 473–481. 10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.04.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Tripathi MM:Certain basic inequalities for submanifolds in (κ,μ)-space. Recent advances in Riemannian and Lorentzian geometries 2003, 187–202. (Baltimore, MD)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have greatly benefited from the referee’s report. So we wish to express our gratitude to the reviewer for his/her valuable suggestions which improved the content and presentation of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Gülbahar.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors did not provide this information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gülbahar, M., Kilic̣, E. & Keleṣ, S. Chen-like inequalities on lightlike hypersurfaces of a Lorentzian manifold. J Inequal Appl 2013, 266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-266

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-266

Keywords

  • Scalar Curvature
  • Sectional Curvature
  • Fundamental Form
  • Plane Section
  • Ricci Curvature