Open Access

On -class A contractions

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20132013:239

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-239

Received: 11 January 2013

Accepted: 25 April 2013

Published: 13 May 2013

Abstract

A Hilbert space operator T belongs to -class A if | T 2 | | T | 2 0 . The famous Fuglede-Putnam theorem is as follows: the operator equation A X = X B implies A X = X B when A and B are normal operators. In this paper, firstly we prove that if T is a contraction of -class A operators, then either T has a nontrivial invariant subspace or T is a proper contraction and the nonnegative operator D = | T 2 | | T | 2 is a strongly stable contraction; secondly, we show that if X is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator, A and ( B ) 1 are -class A operators such that A X = X B , then A X = X B .

MSC:47B20, 47A63.

Keywords

-class A operatorscontraction operatorsthe Fuglede-Putnam theorem

1 Introduction

Let be a complex Hilbert space and let be the set of complex numbers. Let B ( H ) denote the C -algebra of all bounded linear operators acting on . For operators T B ( H ) , we shall write kerT and ranT for the null space and the range of T, respectively. Also, let σ ( T ) denote the spectrum of T.

Recall that T B ( H ) is called p-hyponormal for p > 0 if ( T T ) p ( T T ) p 0 [1]; when p = 1 , T is called hyponormal. And T is called paranormal if T x 2 T 2 x x for all x H [2, 3]. And T is called normaloid if T n = T n for all n N (equivalently, T = r ( T ) , the spectral radius of T). In order to discuss the relations between paranormal and p-hyponormal and log-hyponormal operators (T is invertible and log T T log T T ), Furuta et al. [4] introduced a very interesting class of operators: class A defined by | T 2 | | T | 2 0 , where | T | = ( T T ) 1 2 which is called the absolute value of T; and they showed that the class A is a subclass of paranormal and contains p-hyponormal and log-hyponormal operators. Recently Duggal et al. [5] introduced -class A operators (i.e., | T 2 | | T | 2 0 ) and -paranormal operators (i.e., T x 2 T 2 x x for all x H ); and they proved that a -class A operator is a generalization of hyponormal operator and -class A operators form a subclass of the class of -paranormal operators.

A contraction is an operator T such that T 1 . A contraction T is said to be a proper contraction if T x < x for every nonzero x H . A strict contraction is an operator T such that T < 1 . A strict contraction is a proper contraction, but a proper contraction is not necessary a strict contraction, although the concepts of strict and proper contractions coincide for compact operators. A contraction T is of class C 0 if T n x 0 when n for every x H (i.e., T is a strongly stable contraction) and it is said to be of class C 1 if lim n T n x > 0 for every nonzero x H . Classes C 0 and C 1 are defined by considering T instead of T, and we define the class C α β for α , β = 0 , 1 by C α β = C α C β . An isometry is a contraction for which T x = x for every x H .

In this paper, firstly we prove that if T is a contraction of -class A operators, then either T has a nontrivial invariant subspace or T is a proper contraction and the nonnegative operator D = | T 2 | | T | 2 is a strongly stable contraction; secondly, we show that if X is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator, A and ( B ) 1 are -class A operators such that A X = X B , then A X = X B .

2 On -class A contractions

Theorem 2.1 If T is a contraction of -class A operators, then the nonnegative operator D = | T 2 | | T | 2 is a contraction whose power sequence { D n } converges strongly to a projection P, and T P = 0 .

Proof Suppose that T is a contraction of -class A operators, then D = | T 2 | | T | 2 0 . Let R = D 1 2 . Then for every x H ,
D n + 1 x , x = R n + 1 x 2 = D R n x , R n x = | T 2 | R n x , R n x | T | 2 R n x , R n x = | T 2 | 1 2 R n x 2 | T | R n x 2 R n x 2 T R n x 2 R n x 2 = D n x , x .
Thus R (and so D) is a contraction and { D n } is a decreasing sequence of nonnegative contractions. Hence { D n } converges strongly to a projection P. Moreover,
n = 0 m T R n x 2 n = 0 m ( R n x 2 R n + 1 x 2 ) = x 2 R m + 1 x 2 x 2
for all nonnegative integers m and every x H . Therefore T R n x 0 as n , hence we have
T P x = T lim n D n x = lim n T R 2 n x = 0

for every x H . So that T P = 0 . □

Theorem 2.2 Let T be a contraction of -class A operators. If T has no nontrivial invariant subspace, then
  1. (i)

    T is a proper contraction;

     
  2. (ii)

    the nonnegative operator D = | T 2 | | T | 2 is a strongly stable contraction (so that D C 00 ).

     
Proof (i) Suppose that T is a -class A operator, then | T | 2 | T 2 | . We have
T x 2 = | T | 2 x , x | T 2 | x , x | T 2 | x x = T 2 x x
for every x H . By [6] Theorem 3.6, we have that
T T x = T 2 x if and only if T x = T x .
Put U = { x H : T x = T x } = ker ( | T | 2 T 2 ) , which is a subspace of . In the following, we shall show that U is an invariant subspace of T. For every x U , we have
T ( T x ) 2 T 2 T x 2 = T 4 x 2 = T 2 x 2 = T T x 2 T 2 T x T x = T 2 T x T x ,
(2.1)
where the second inequality holds since T is a -class A operator. So, we have that
T 4 x 2 T 2 T x T x ,
that is, T 3 x T 2 T x . Hence we have
T 3 x = T 2 T x .
(2.2)
By (2.2), we have
T 3 x = T 2 T x T T ( T x ) ,
(2.3)
that is, T 2 x T ( T x ) . Hence
T 2 x = T ( T x ) .
(2.4)
Hence by (2.1) and (2.4), we have
T 2 T x T x = T ( T x ) 2 .
So, we have that T ( T x ) = T T x . That is, U is an invariant subspace of T. Now suppose T is a contraction of -class A operators. If T is a strict contraction, then it is trivially a proper contraction. If T is not a strict contraction (i.e., T = 1 ) and T has no nontrivial invariant subspace, then U = { x H : T x = x } = { 0 } (actually, if U = H , then T is an isometry, and isometries have nontrivial invariant subspaces). Thus, for every nonzero x H , T x < x , so T is a proper contraction.
  1. (ii)

    Let T be a contraction of -class A operators. By Theorem 2.1 we have D is a contraction, { D n } converges strongly to a projection P, and T P = 0 . So, P T = 0 . Suppose T has no nontrivial invariant subspace. Since kerP is a nonzero invariant subspace for T whenever P T = 0 and T 0 , it follows that ker P = H . Hence P = 0 and so D n converges strongly to 0, that is, D = | T 2 | | T | 2 is a strongly stable contraction. D is self-adjoint, so that D C 00 . □

     

Since a self-adjoint operator T is a proper contraction if and only if T is a C 00 -contraction, we have the following corollary by Theorem 2.2.

Corollary 2.3 Let T be a contraction of -class A operators. If T has no nontrivial invariant subspace, then both T and the nonnegative operator D = | T 2 | | T | 2 are proper contractions.

3 The Fuglede-Putnam theorem for -class A operators

The famous Fuglede-Putnam theorem is as follows [3, 7, 8].

Theorem 3.1 Let A and B be normal operators and X be an operator such that A X = X B , then A X = X B .

The Fuglede-Putnam theorem was first proved in the case A = B by Fuglede [7] and then a proof in the general case was given by Putnam [8]. Berberian [9] proved that the Fuglede theorem was actually equivalent to that of Putnam by a nice operator matrix derivation trick. Rosenblum [10] gave an elegant and simple proof of the Fuglede-Putnam theorem by using Liouville’s theorem. There were various generalizations of the Fuglede-Putnam theorem to nonnormal operators; we only cite [1114]. For example, Radjabalipour [13] showed that the Fuglede-Putnam theorem holds for hyponormal operators; Uchiyama and Tanahashi [14] showed that the Fuglede-Putnam theorem holds for p-hyponormal and log-hyponormal operators. If let X B ( H ) be Hilbert-Schmidt class, Mecheri and Uchiyama [15] showed that normality in the Fuglede-Putnam theorem can be replaced by A and B class A operators. In this paper, we show that if X is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator, A and ( B ) 1 are -class A operators such that A X = X B , then A X = X B .

Let C 2 ( H ) denote the Hilbert-Schmidt class. For each pair of operators A , B B ( H ) , there is an operator Γ A , B defined on C 2 ( H ) via the formula Γ A , B ( X ) = A X B in [11]. Obviously, Γ A , B A B . The adjoint of Γ A , B is given by the formula Γ A , B ( X ) = A X B ; see details [11].

Let A B denote the tensor product on the product space H H for non-zero A , B B ( H ) . In [5], Duggal et al. give a necessary and sufficient condition for A B to be a -class A operator.

Lemma 3.2 (see [5])

Let A , B B ( H ) be non-zero operators. Then A B belongs to -class A operators if and only if A and B belong to -class A operators.

Theorem 3.3 Let A and B B ( H ) . Then Γ A , B is a -class A operator on C 2 ( H ) if and only if A and B belong to -class A operators.

Proof The unitary operator U : C 2 ( H ) H H by a map ( x y ) x y induces the -isomorphism Ψ : B ( C 2 ( H ) ) B ( H H ) by a map X U X U . Then we can obtain Ψ ( Γ A , B ) = A B ; see details [16]. This completes the proof by Lemma 3.2. □

Lemma 3.4 (see [17])

Let T B ( H ) be a -class A operator. If λ 0 and ( T λ ) x = 0 for some x H , then ( T λ ) x = 0 .

Now we are ready to extend the Fuglede-Putnam theorem to -class A operators.

Theorem 3.5 Let A and ( B ) 1 be -class A operators. If A X = X B for X C 2 ( H ) , then A X = X B .

Proof Let Γ be defined on C 2 ( H ) by Γ Y = A Y B 1 . Since A and ( B 1 ) = ( B ) 1 are -class A operators, we have that Γ is a -class A operator on C 2 ( H ) by Theorem 3.3. Moreover, we have Γ X = A X B 1 = X because of A X = X B . Hence X is an eigenvector of Γ. By Lemma 3.4 we have Γ X = A X ( B 1 ) = X , that is, A X = X B . The proof is complete. □

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11071188); the Natural Science Foundation of the Department of Education, Henan Province (2011A110009), Project of Science and Technology Department of Henan province (122300410375) and Key Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province (122102210132).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Normal University

References

  1. Aluthge A: On p -hyponormal operators for 0 < p < 1 . Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 1990, 13: 307–315. 10.1007/BF01199886MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Furuta T: On the class of paranormal operators. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 1967, 43: 594–598. 10.3792/pja/1195521514MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Furuta T: Invitation to Linear Operators. Taylor & Francis, London; 2001.View ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Furuta T, Ito M, Yamazaki T: A subclass of paranormal operators including class of log-hyponormal and several classes. Sci. Math. 1998, 1(3):389–403.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Duggal BP, Jeon IH, Kim IH: On -paranormal contractions and properties for -class A operators. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012, 436: 954–962. 10.1016/j.laa.2011.06.002MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Kubrusly CS, Levan N: Proper contractions and invariant subspace. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2001, 28: 223–230. 10.1155/S0161171201006287MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuglede B: A commutativity theorem for normal operators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1950, 36: 35–40. 10.1073/pnas.36.1.35MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Putnam CR: On normal operators in Hilbert space. Am. J. Math. 1951, 73: 357–362. 10.2307/2372180MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Berberian SK: Note on a theorem of Fuglede and Putnam. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1959, 10: 175–182. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1959-0107826-9MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenblum M: On a theorem of Fuglede and Putnam. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1958, 33: 376–377.MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Berberian SK: Extensions of a theorem of Fuglede-Putnam. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1978, 71: 113–114. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0487554-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Furuta T: On relaxation of normality in the of Fuglede-Putnam theorem. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1979, 77: 324–328. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1979-0545590-2MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Radjabalipour M: An extension of Fuglede-Putnam theorem for hyponormal operators. Math. Z. 1987, 194: 117–120. 10.1007/BF01168010MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Uchiyama A, Tanahashi K: Fuglede-Putnam’s theorem for p -hyponormal or log-hyponormal operators. Glasg. Math. J. 2002, 44: 397–410. 10.1017/S0017089502030057MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Mecheri S, Uchiyama A: An extension of the Fuglede-Putnam’s theorem to class A operators. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 13(1):57–61.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown A, Pearcy C: Spectra of tensor products of operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1966, 17: 162–166. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1966-0188786-5MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Mecheri S: Isolated points of spectrum of k -quasi--class A operators. Stud. Math. 2012, 208: 87–96. 10.4064/sm208-1-6MathSciNetView ArticleMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gao and Li; licensee Springer. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.