The construction of simplicial groups in digital images
© Öztunç et al.; licensee Springer 2013
Received: 17 December 2012
Accepted: 8 March 2013
Published: 2 April 2013
In this paper, we recall some definitions and properties from digital topology, and we consider the simplices and simplicial complexes in digital images due to adjacency relations. Then we define the simplicial set and conclude that the simplicial identities are satisfied in digital images. Finally, we construct the group structure in digital images and define the simplicial groups in digital images. Consequently, we calculate the digital homology group of two-dimensional digital simplicial group.
MSC:55N35, 68R10, 68U10, 18G30.
1 Introduction and basic concepts
Digital topology is a branch of mathematics where the image processing and digital image processing are studied. Many mathematicians such as Rosenfeld , Han , Kong [3, 4], Malgouyres , Boxer [6–8], Karaca [9–11] and others have contributed to this area with their research. The notions of a digital image, a digital continuous map and digital homotopy were studied in literature [1, 4, 5, 7, 8]. Their recognition and efficient computation became a useful material for our study.
On the other hand, simplicial groups were first studied by Kan  in the 1950s. We carry the notion of a digital image on to the simplicial groups and construct algebraic structures in digital images such as simplicial sets, simplicial groups by using the figures and definitions in . In dimension one, we use the 2-adjacency relation, and in dimension two, we use the 8-adjacency relation.
Assume that is n-dimensional Euclidean spaces. A finite subset of with an adjacency relation is called to be a digital image.
Two points p and q in ℤ are 2-adjacent if .
Two points p and q in are 8-adjacent if they are distinct and differ by at most 1 in each coordinate.
Two points p and q in are 4-adjacent if they are 8-adjacent and differ by exactly one coordinate.
Two points p and q in are 26-adjacent if they are distinct and differ by at most 1 in each coordinate.
Two points p and q in are 18-adjacent if they are 26-adjacent and differ in at most two coordinates.
Suppose that κ is an adjacency relation defined on . A digital image is κ-connected  if and only if for every pair of points , , there is a set such that , and and are κ-neighbors, .
Definition 1.2 Let X and Y be digital images such that , . Then the digital function is a function which is defined between digital images.
Let X and Y be digital images such that , . Assume that is a function. Let be an adjacency relation defined on , . Then f is called to be -continuous if the image under f of every -connected subset of X is -connected.
A function which is defined in Definition 1.3 is referred to be digitally continuous. A consequence of this definition is given below.
Let X and Y be digital images. Then the function is said to be -continuous if and only if for every such that and are -adjacent, either or and are -adjacent.
Definition 1.5 ()
in which 2-adjacency is assumed.
For instance, if κ is an adjacency relation on a digital image Y, then is -connected if and only if for every , either or and are κ-adjacent.
Definition 1.6 ()
If p and q are distinct points of , then p and q are κ-adjacent.
If and , then (note that this implies that every point p belonging to a simplex determines a simplex ).
If P belongs to X, then every face of P also belongs to X.
If , then is either empty or a common face of P and Q.
The dimension of a digital simplicial complex X is the largest integer m such that X has an m-simplex.
Example 1.8 If X is a digital simplicial complex and is a -simplex of X, then any subset of is a face of that digital simplex and thus is itself a digital simplex of X. In particular, we can think of the -simplex as a geometric digital simplicial complex consisting of itself and its face.
2 Digital simplicial maps
Corollary 2.1 Every digital simplicial map is digitally continuous.
Proof Let K and L be digital simplicial complexes having and adjacency, respectively, and let be a digital simplicial map. Since K is a simplicial complex, then the point of simplices of K have adjacency. So, f maps the points of the simplices of K to the points of the simplices of L. Therefore the image of -adjacent points under f is -adjacent points. Consequently, f is -continuous, i.e., digitally continuous. □
Example 2.2 A simple but interesting and important example is the inclusion of a -simplex into a digital simplicial complex. If X is a digital simplicial complex and is a collection of vertices of X that spans a -simplex of X, then is itself a digital simplicial complex. We then have a simplicial map that takes each to the corresponding vertex in X and hence takes K identically to itself inside X.
Example 2.3 Let be a -simplex, one of whose -faces is . Consider the simplicial map , determined by , , , that collapses the -simplex down to the -simplex (see Figure 5). The great benefit of the theory of digital simplicial sets is a way to generalize these kinds of maps in order to preserve information so that we can still see the image of the -simplex hiding in the -simplex as a degenerate -simplex.
2.1 Face maps in digital images
2.2 Delta sets and delta maps in digital images
Delta sets (sometimes called -sets) constitute an intermediary between digital simplicial complexes and digital simplicial sets.
Definition 2.4 A delta set consists of a sequence of sets which have adjacency respectively, and the maps for each i and , , such that whenever .
Of course this is just an abstraction, and generalization, of the definition of an ordered digital simplicial complex, in which are the sets of -simplices and the are the digital face maps.
2.3 Degenerate maps in digital images
Degeneracy maps in digital images are, in some sense, the conceptual converse of face maps. Recall that the face map takes a -simplex and gives us back its j th -face. On the other hand, the j th digital degeneracy map takes a -simplex and gives us back the j th degenerate -simplex in digital images living inside it.
As usual, we illustrate with the standard -simplex, which will be a model for what happens in all digital simplicial sets. Given the standard -simplex as , there are -digital degeneracy maps , defined by . In other words, gives us the unique degenerate -simplex in with only the j th vertex repeated.
Again, the geometric concept is that can be thought of as the process of collapsing down into by the digital simplicial map defined by for , and for .
This idea extends naturally to digital simplicial complexes, to digital delta sets, and also to simplices that are already degenerate. If we have a (possibly degenerate) -simplex with for each k, , then we set , i.e., always repeats. Thus we may say that this is a digital degenerate simplex in .
Also, as for the , there are certain natural relations that the degeneracy maps possess. In particular, if , then . Note that we have in the last formula, not , since the application of pushes j one slot to the right.
These situations are all clear. For example, applying to either side of the first formula yields . Note also that the middle formula takes care of both and .
3 The structure of a simplicial set in digital images
Now we give the definition of digital simplicial sets.
Example 3.2 If the standard -simplex is now realized as a digital simplicial set, then it is the unique digital simplicial set with one element in each , . Thus the element in dimension n is .
Example 3.3 As a digital simplicial set, the standard ordered -simplex already has elements in each . Namely, .
3.1 Nondegenerate simplices in digital images
A -simplex is called nondegenerate if x cannot be written as for any and any i.
Note that it is possible for a nondegenerate -simplex to have a degenerate -face. It is also possible for a degenerate simplex to have a nondegenerate face (for example, we know for any x, it is degenerate or not).
3.2 Categorical definition
As for digital delta sets, the basic properties of simplicial sets derive from those of the standard ordered -simplex. In fact, that is where the prototypes of both the face and degeneracy maps live and where we first developed the axioms relating them. Thus it is not surprising (at this point) that there is a categorical definition of digital simplicial sets, analogous to the one for delta sets, in which each digital simplicial set is the functorial image of a category and Δ is built from the standard digital simplices.
Definition 3.4 The category has the finite ordered sets as objects. The morphisms of are order-preserving functions .
Definition 3.5 (Categorical definition of digital simplicial set)
Let DSet be a category of digital sets, that is, DSet has digital images as objects and digital functions as morphisms. A digital simplicial set is a contravariant functor (equivalently, a covariant functor ).
4 Simplicial groups in digital images
Group axioms are satisfied in a finite subset of , including the point.
Example 4.2 Suppose X is a digital simplicial set with κ-adjacency. Then we may define the simplicial group having as a free abelian group generated by the elements of with and in taken to be linear extensions of the face maps and of X.
We can also present the total face map and then define the homology as the homology of the chain complex .
This defines a simplicial group in digital images. The realization of an underlying digital simplicial set turns out to be the classifying space of the group G, and so the homology coincides with group homology of the group G.
5 Digital homology groups of simplicial groups
Definition 5.1 is a free abelian group with basis of all digital -simplices in X.
Corollary 5.2 Let X be an m-dimensional digital simplicial group with κ-adjacency. Then if , then is a trivial group.
is called boundary homomorphism. (Here denotes the deletion of the point .)
is called the q th digital homology group, where is the groups of digital simplicial q-cycles and is the groups of digital simplicial q-boundaries.
Proposition 5.6 Let be a -simplex. Then .
So, ve , .
Since , then .
Consequently, . □
Thus . Therefore . □
So, . Thus .
In this paper we introduce the simplicial groups in digital images, and we calculate digital homology group of two-dimensional simplicial group.
Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.
The authors thank the editor and the referees for their valuable suggestions to improve the quality of this paper.
- Rosenfeld A: Continuous functions on digital pictures. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1986, 4: 177–184. 10.1016/0167-8655(86)90017-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han SE: Computer topology and its applications. Honam Math. J. 2003, 25: 153–162.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Kong TY: A digital fundamental group. Comput. Graph. 1989, 13: 159–166. 10.1016/0097-8493(89)90058-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kong TY, Roscoe AW, Rosenfeld A: Concepts of digital topology. Topol. Appl. 1992, 46: 219–262. 10.1016/0166-8641(92)90016-SMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malgouyres R: Homotopy in 2-dimensional digital images. Theor. Comput. Sci. 2000, 230: 221–233. 10.1016/S0304-3975(98)00347-8MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boxer L: Digitally continuous functions. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 1994, 15: 833–839. 10.1016/0167-8655(94)90012-4View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boxer L: A classical construction for the digital fundamental group. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 1999, 10: 51–62. 10.1023/A:1008370600456MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boxer L: Properties of digital homotopy. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 2005, 22: 19–26. 10.1007/s10851-005-4780-yMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karaca I, Boxer L, Öztel A: Topological invariants in digital images. J. Math. Sci.: Adv. Appl. 2011, 11(2):109–140.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- Karaca I, Boxer L: Some properties of digital covering spaces. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 2010, 37: 17–26. 10.1007/s10851-010-0189-3MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karaca I, Boxer L: The classification of digital covering spaces. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 2008, 32: 23–29. 10.1007/s10851-008-0088-zMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kan DM: A combinatorial definition of homotopy groups. Ann. Math. 1958, 61: 288–312.Google Scholar
- Freidman G: An elementary illustrated introduction to simplicial set. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2011, 42: 353–424.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Arslan H, Karaca I, Öztel A: Homology groups of n -dimensional digital images. XXI. Turkish National Mathematics Symposium 2008. B1–13Google Scholar
- Herman GT: Oriented surfaces in digital spaces. CVGIP, Graph. Models Image Process. 1993, 55: 381–396. 10.1006/cgip.1993.1029View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Khalimsky E: Motion, deformation, and homotopy in finite spaces. Proceedings IEEE Intl. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1987, 227–234.Google Scholar
- Munkres JR: Topology a First Course. Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs; 1975.Google Scholar
- Mutlu A, Mutlu B, Öztunç S: On digital homotopy of digital paths. Res. J. Pure Algebra 2012, 2(6):147–154.Google Scholar
- Öztunç S, Mutlu A: Categories in digital images. Am. J. Math. Stat. 2013, 3(1):62–66.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.