- Research
- Open Access

# Orthogonal stability of an additive-quartic functional equation with the fixed point alternative

- Sung Jin Lee
^{1}, - Choonkil Park
^{2}and - Reza Saadati
^{3}Email author

**2012**:83

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-83

© Lee et al; licensee Springer. 2012

**Received: **22 April 2011

**Accepted: **12 April 2012

**Published: **12 April 2012

## Abstract

Using the fixed point method, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the orthogonally additive-quartic functional equation

for all *x, y* with *x* ⊥ *y*, where ⊥ is the orthogonality in the sense of Rätz.

**AMS Subject Classification**: Primary, 39B55; 47H10; 39B52; 46H25.

## Keywords

- Hyers-Ulam stability
- orthogonally additive-quartic functional equation
- fixed point
- orthogonality space

## 1 Introduction and preliminaries

Assume that *X* is a real inner product space and $f:X\to \mathcal{R}$ is a solution of the orthogonal Cauchy functional equation *f*(*x* + *y*) = *f*(*x*) + *f*(*y*), 〈*x, y*〉 = 0. By the Pythagorean theorem *f*(*x*) = ∥*x*∥^{2} is a solution of the conditional equation. Of course, this function does not satisfy the additivity equation everywhere. Thus orthogonal Cauchy equation is not equivalent to the classic Cauchy equation on the whole inner product space.

in which ⊥ is an abstract orthogonality relation, was first investigated by Gudder and Strawther [3]. They defined ⊥ by a system consisting of five axioms and described the general semi-continuous real-valued solution of conditional Cauchy functional equation. In 1985, Rätz [4] introduced a new definition of orthogonality by using more restrictive axioms than of Gudder and Strawther. Moreover, he investigated the structure of orthogonally additive mappings. Rätz and Szabó [5] investigated the problem in a rather more general framework.

Let us recall the orthogonality in the sense of Rätz [4].

Suppose *X* is a real vector space with dim *X* ≥ 2 and ⊥ is a binary relation on *X* with the following properties:

(*O*_{1}) totality of ⊥ for zero: *x* ⊥ 0, 0 ⊥ *x* for all *x* ∈ *X*;

(*O*_{2}) independence: if *x, y* ∈ *X* - {0}, *x* ⊥ *y*, then *x, y* are linearly independent;

(*O*_{3}) homogeneity: if *x, y* ∈ *X, x* ⊥ *y*, then *αx* ⊥ *βy* for all $\alpha ,\beta \in \mathcal{R}$;

(*O*_{4}) the Thalesian property: if *P* is a 2-dimensional subspace of *X, x* ∈ *P* and $\lambda \in {\mathcal{R}}_{+}$, which is the set of nonnegative real numbers, then there exists *y*_{0} ∈ *P* such that *x* ⊥ *y*_{0} and *x* + *y*_{0} ⊥ λ*x* - *y*_{0}.

The pair (*X*, ⊥) is called an orthogonality space. By an orthogonality normed space we mean an orthogonality space having a normed structure.

- (i)
The trivial orthogonality on a vector space

*X*defined by (*O*_{1}), and for non-zero elements*x, y*∈*X, x*⊥*y*if and only if*x, y*are linearly independent. - (ii)
The ordinary orthogonality on an inner product space (

*X*, 〈.,.〉) given by*x*⊥*y*if and only if 〈*x, y*〉 = 0. - (iii)
The Birkhoff-James orthogonality on a normed space (

*X*, ∥.∥) defined by*x*⊥*y*if and only if ∥*x*+ λ*y*∥ ≥ ∥*x*∥ for all $\lambda \in \mathcal{R}$.

The relation ⊥ is called symmetric if *x* ⊥ *y* implies that *y* ⊥ *x* for all *x, y* ∈ *X*. Clearly examples (i) and (ii) are symmetric but example (iii) is not. It is remarkable to note, however, that a real normed space of dimension greater than 2 is an inner product space if and only if the Birkhoff-James orthogonality is symmetric. There are several orthogonality notions on a real normed space such as Birkhoff-James, Boussouis, Singer, Carlsson, unitary-Boussouis, Roberts, Phythagorean, isosceles and Diminnie (see [6–11]).

The stability problem of functional equations originated from the following question of Ulam [12]: *Under what condition does there exist an additive mapping near an approximately additive mapping?* In 1941, Hyers [13] gave a partial affirmative answer to the question of Ulam in the context of Banach spaces. In 1978, Rassias [14] extended the theorem of Hyers by considering the unbounded Cauchy difference ∥*f*(*x* + *y*)-*f*(*x*)-*f*(*y*)∥ ≤ *ε*(∥*x*∥^{
p
}+∥*y*∥^{
p
}), (*ε* > 0, *p* ∈ [0,1)). The result of Rassias has provided a lot of influence in the development of what we now call *generalized Hyers-Ulam stability* or *Hyers-Ulam stability* of functional equations. During the last decades several stability problems of functional equations have been investigated in the spirit of Hyers-Ulam-Rassias. The reader is referred to [15–18] and references therein for detailed information on stability of functional equations.

Ger and Sikorska [19] investigated the orthogonal stability of the Cauchy functional equation *f*(*x* + *y*) = *f*(*x*) + *f*(*y*), namely, they showed that if *f* is a mapping from an orthogonality space *X* into a real Banach space *Y* and ∥*f*(*x* + *y*) - *f*(*x*) - *f*(*y*)∥ ≤ *ε* for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y* and some *ε* > 0, then there exists exactly one orthogonally additive mapping *g* : *X* → *Y* such that $\u2225f\left(x\right)-g\left(x\right)\u2225\le \frac{16}{3}\epsilon $ for all *x* ∈ *X*.

The first author treating the stability of the quadratic equation was Skof [20] by proving that if *f* is a mapping from a normed space *X* into a Banach space *Y* satisfying ∥*f*(*x* + *y*) + *f*(*x* - *y*) - 2*f*(*x*) - 2*f*(*y*)∥ ≤ *ε* for some *ε* > 0, then there is a unique quadratic mapping *g* : *X* → *Y* such that $\u2225f\left(x\right)-g\left(x\right)\u2225\le \frac{\epsilon}{2}$. Cholewa [21] extended the Skof's theorem by replacing *X* by an abelian group *G*. The Skof's result was later generalized by Czerwik [22] in the spirit of Hyers-Ulam-Rassias. The stability problem of functional equations has been extensively investigated by some mathematicians (see [23–27]).

was first investigated by Vajzović [28] when *X* is a Hilbert space, *Y* is the scalar field, *f* is continuous and ⊥ means the Hilbert space orthogonality. Later, Drljević [29], Fochi [30], Moslehian [31, 32] and Szabό [33] generalized this result. See also [34, 35].

*X*be a set. A function

*d*:

*X*×

*X*→ [0, ∞] is called a

*generalized metric*on

*X*if

*d*satisfies

- (1)
*d*(*x, y*) = 0 if and only if*x*=*y*; - (2)
*d*(*x*,*y*) =*d*(*y, x*) for all*x, y*∈*X*; - (3)
*d*(*x, z*) ≤*d*(*x, y*) +*d*(*y, z*) for all*x, y, z*∈*X*.

We recall a fundamental result in fixed point theory.

**Theorem 1.1**[36, 37]

*Let*(

*X, d) be a complete generalized metric space and let J*:

*X*→

*X be a strictly contractive mapping with Lipschitz constant α*< 1.

*Then for each given element x*∈

*X, either*

*for all nonnegative integers n or there exists a positive integer n*

_{0}

*such that*

- (1)
*d*(*J*^{ n }*x, J*^{n+1}*x*) < ∞, ∀*n*≥*n*_{0}; - (2)
*the sequence*{*J*^{ n }*x*}*converges to a fixed point y* of J;* - (3)
*y* is the unique fixed point of J in the set*$Y=\left\{y\in X|d\left({J}^{{n}_{0}}x,y\right)<\infty \right\}$; - (4)
$d\left(y,y*\right)\le \frac{1}{1-\alpha}d\left(y,Jy\right)$

*for all y*∈*Y*.

In 1996, Isac and Rassias [38] were the first to provide applications of stability theory of functional equations for the proof of new fixed point theorems with applications. By using fixed point methods, the stability problems of several functional equations have been extensively investigated by a number of authors (see [39–45]).

It is easy to show that the function *f*(*x*) = *x*^{4} satisfies the functional equation (1), which is called a *quartic functional equation* and every solution of the quartic functional equation is said to be a *quartic mapping*.

in orthogonality spaces for an odd mapping.

In Section 3, we prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the orthogonally additive-quartic functional equation (2) in orthogonality spaces for an even mapping.

Throughout this paper, assume that (*X*, ⊥) is an orthogonality space and that (*Y*, ∥.∥_{
Y
}) is a real Banach space.

## 2 Stability of the orthogonally additive-quadratic functional equation: an odd mapping case

for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y* : an odd mapping case.

**Definition 2.1**

*A mapping f*:

*X*→

*Y is called an orthogonally additive mapping if*

*for all x, y* ∈ *X with x* ⊥ *y*.

**Theorem**2.2

*Let φ*:

*X*

^{2}→ [0, ∞)

*be a function such that there exists an α*< 1

*with*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an odd mapping satisfying*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. Then there exists a unique orthogonally additive mapping L*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. Putting

*y*= 0 in (4), we get

*x*∈

*X*, since

*x*⊥ 0. So

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

*S*:

where, as usual, inf *ϕ* = +∞. It is easy to show that (*S, d*) is complete (see [47]).

*J*:

*S*→

*S*such that

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

*g, h*∈

*S*be given such that

*d*(

*g, h*) =

*ε*. Then

*x*∈

*X*. Hence

*x*∈

*X*. So

*d*(

*g, h*) =

*ε*implies that

*d*(

*Jg, Jh*) ≤

*αε*. This means that

for all *g*, *h* ∈ *S*.

It follows from (7) that $d\left(f,Jf\right)\le \frac{1}{4}$.

*L*:

*X*→

*Y*satisfying the following:

- (1)
*L*is a fixed point of*J*, i.e.,$L\left(2x\right)=2L\left(x\right)$(8)

*x*∈

*X*. The mapping

*L*is a unique fixed point of

*J*in the set

*L*is a unique mapping satisfying (8) such that there exists a

*μ*∈ (0, ∞) satisfying

*x*∈

*X*;

- (2)
*d*(*J*^{ n }*f, L*) → 0 as*n*→ ∞. This implies the equality$\underset{n\to \infty}{\text{lim}}\frac{1}{{2}^{n}}f\left({2}^{n}x\right)=L\left(x\right)$

*x*∈

*X*;

- (3)$d\left(f,L\right)\le \frac{1}{1-\alpha}d\left(f,Jf\right)$, which implies the inequality$d\left(f,L\right)\le \frac{1}{4-4\alpha}.$

This implies that the inequality (5) holds.

*x, y*∈

*X*with

*x*⊥

*y*. So

*x, y*∈

*X*with

*x*⊥

*y*. Since

*f*is odd,

*L*is odd. Hence

*L*:

*X*→

*Y*is an orthogonally additive mapping, i.e.,

for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y*. Thus *L* : *X* → *Y* is a unique orthogonally additive mapping satisfying (5), as desired.

From now on, in corollaries, assume that (*X*, ⊥) is an orthogonality normed space.

**Corollary 2.3**

*Let θ be a positive real number and p a real number with*0 <

*p*< 1.

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an odd mapping satisfying*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. Then there exists a unique orthogonally additive mapping L*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. The proof follows from Theorem 2.2 by taking *φ*(*x*, *y*) = *θ*(∥*x*∥^{
p
}+ ∥*y*∥^{
p
}) for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y*. Then we can choose *α* = 2^{p-1}and we get the desired result.

**Theorem 2.4**

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an odd mapping satisfying*(4)

*for which there exists a function φ*:

*X*

^{2}→ [0,∞)

*such that*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. Then there exists a unique orthogonally additive mapping L*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. Let (

*S, d*) be the generalized metric space defined in the proof of Theorem 2.2. Now we consider the linear mapping

*J*:

*S*→

*S*such that

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

Thus we obtain the inequality (10).

The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2.

**Corollary 2.5**

*Let θ be a positive real number and p a real number with p*> 1.

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an odd mapping satisfying*(9).

*Then there exists a unique orthogonally additive mapping L*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. The proof follows from Theorem 2.4 by taking *φ*(*x, y*) = *θ*(∥*x*∥^{
p
}+ ∥*y*∥^{
p
}) for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y*. Then we can choose *α* = 2^{1-p}and we get the desired result.

## 3 Stability of the orthogonally additive-quartic functional equation: an even mapping case

In this section, applying some ideas from [16, 19], we deal with the stability problem for the orthogonally additive-quartic functional equation given in the previous section: an even mapping case.

**Definition 3.1**

*A mapping f*:

*X*→

*Y is called an orthogonally quartic mapping if*

*for all x, y* ∈ *X with x* ⊥ *y*.

**Theorem 3.2**

*Let φ*:

*X*

^{2}→ [0, ∞)

*be a function such that there exists an α*< 1

*with*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an even mapping satisfying f*(0) = 0

*and*(4).

*Then there exists a unique orthogonally quartic mapping P*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. Putting

*y*= 0 in (4), we get

*x*∈

*X*, since

*x*⊥ 0. So

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

*S, d*) be the generalized metric space defined in the proof of Theorem 2.2. Now we consider the linear mapping

*J*:

*S*→

*S*such that

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2.

**Corollary 3.3**

*Let θ be a positive real number and p a real number with*0 <

*p*< 4.

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an even mapping satisfying f*(0) = 0

*and*(9).

*Then there exists a unique orthogonally quartic mapping P*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. The proof follows from Theorem 3.2 by taking *φ*(*x, y*) = *θ*(∥*x*∥^{
p
}+ ∥*y*∥^{
p
}) for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y*. Then we can choose *α* = 2^{p-4}and we get the desired result.

**Theorem 3.4**

*Let f : X*→

*Y be an even mapping satisfying*(4)

*and f*(0) = 0

*for which there exists a function φ*:

*X*

^{2}→ [0, ∞)

*such that*

*for all x, y*∈

*X with x*⊥

*y. There exists a unique orthogonally quartic mapping P*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*

**Proof**. Let (*S, d*) be the generalized metric space defined in the proof of Theorem 2.2.

*J*:

*S*→

*S*such that

for all *x* ∈ *X*.

It follows from (11) that $d\left(f,Jf\right)\le \frac{\alpha}{32}$. So we obtain the inequality (12).

The rest of the proof is similar to the proof of Theorem 2.2.

**Corollary 3.5**

*Let θ be a positive real number and p a real number with p*> 4.

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be an even mapping satisfying f*(0) = 0

*and*(9).

*Then there exists a unique orthogonally quartic mapping P*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

**Proof**. The proof follows from Theorem 3.4 by taking *φ*(*x, y*) = *θ*(∥*x*∥^{
p
}+ ∥*y*∥^{
p
}) for all *x, y* ∈ *X* with *x* ⊥ *y*. Then we can choose *α* = 2^{4-p}and we get the desired result.

Let ${f}_{o}\left(x\right)=\frac{f\left(x\right)-f\left(-x\right)}{2}$ and ${f}_{e}\left(x\right)=\frac{f\left(x\right)+f\left(-x\right)}{2}$. Then *f*_{
o
}is an odd mapping and *f*_{
e
}is an even mapping such that *f* = *f*_{
o
}+ *f*_{
e
}.

The above corollaries can be summarized as follows:

**Theorem 3.6**

*Assume that*(

*X*, ⊥)

*is an orthogonality normed space. Let θ be a positive real number and p a real number with*0 <

*p*< 1

*or p*> 4.

*Let f*:

*X*→

*Y be a mapping satisfying f*(0) = 0

*and*(9).

*Then there exist an orthogonally additive mapping L*:

*X*→

*Y and an orthogonally quartic mapping P*:

*X*→

*Y such that*

*for all x* ∈ *X*.

## Declarations

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Daejin University Research Grants in 2012.

## Authors’ Affiliations

## References

- Pinsker AG: Sur une fonctionnelle dans l'espace de Hilbert.
*C R (Dokl) Acad Sci URSS, n Ser*1938, 20: 411–414.Google Scholar - Sundaresan K: Orthogonality and nonlinear functionals on Banach spaces.
*Proc Am Math Soc*1972, 34: 187–190.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Gudder S, Strawther D: Orthogonally additive and orthogonally increasing functions on vector spaces.
*Pac J Math*1975, 58: 427–436.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rätz J: On orthogonally additive mappings.
*Aequationes Math*1985, 28: 35–49.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rätz J, Szabó Gy: On orthogonally additive mappings
*IV*.*Aequationes Math*1989, 38: 73–85.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Alonso J, Benítez C: Orthogonality in normed linear spaces: a survey
*I*.*Main properties Extracta Math*1988, 3: 1–15.Google Scholar - Alonso J, Benítez C: Orthogonality in normed linear spaces: a survey
*II*.*Relations between main orthogonalities Extracta Math*1989, 4: 121–131.Google Scholar - Birkhoff G: Orthogonality in linear metric spaces.
*Duke Math J*1935, 1: 169–172.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Carlsson SO: Orthogonality in normed linear spaces.
*Ark Mat*1962, 4: 297–318.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Diminnie CR: A new orthogonality relation for normed linear spaces.
*Math Nachr*1983, 114: 197–203.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - James RC: Orthogonality and linear functionals in normed linear spaces.
*Trans Am Math Soc*1947, 61: 265–292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ulam SM:
*Problems in Modern Mathematics.*Wiley, New York; 1960.Google Scholar - Hyers DH: On the stability of the linear functional equation.
*Proc Nat Acad Sci USA*1941, 27: 222–224.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rassias ThM: On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces.
*Proc Amer Math Soc*1978, 72: 297–300.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Czerwik S: Stability of Functional Equations of Ulam-Hyers-Rassias Type.
*Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Florida*2003.Google Scholar - Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias ThM:
*Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables.*Birkhäuser, Basel; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Jung S:
*Hyers-Ulam-Rassias Stability of Functional Equations in Mathematical Analysis.*Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, Florida; 2001.Google Scholar - Rassias ThM:
*Functional Equations, Inequalities and Applications.*Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London; 2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Ger R, Sikorska J: Stability of the orthogonal additivity.
*Bull Polish Acad Sci Math*1995, 43: 143–151.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Skof F: Proprietà locali e approssimazione di operatori.
*Rend Sem Mat Fis Milano*1983, 53: 113–129.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cholewa PW: Remarks on the stability of functional equations.
*Aequationes Math*1984, 27: 76–86.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Czerwik S: On the stability of the quadratic mapping in normed spaces.
*Abh Math Sem Univ Hamburg*1992, 62: 59–64.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Czerwik S:
*Functional Equations and Inequalities in Several Variables.*World Scientific Publishing Company/New Jersey/London/Singapore/Hong Kong; 2002.Google Scholar - Park C, Park J: Generalized Hyers-Ulam stability of an Euler-Lagrange type additive mapping.
*J Diff Equ Appl*2006, 12: 1277–1288.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rassias ThM: On the stability of the quadratic functional equation and its applications.
*Studia Univ Babeş-Bolyai Math*1998, 43: 89–124.Google Scholar - Rassias ThM: The problem of S.M. Ulam for approximately multiplicative mappings.
*J Math Anal Appl*2000, 246: 352–378.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Rassias ThM: On the stability of functional equations in Banach spaces.
*J Math Anal Appl*2000, 251: 264–284.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Vajzović F: Über das Funktional
*H*mit der Eigenschaft: (*x, y*) = 0 ⇒*H*(*x*+*y*)+*H*(*x*-*y*) = 2*H*(*x*) + 2*H*(*y*).*Glasnik Mat Ser III*1967, 2(22):73–81.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Drljević F: On a functional which is quadratic on
*A*-orthogonal vectors.*Publ Inst Math (Beograd)*1986, 54: 63–71.Google Scholar - Fochi M: Functional equations in
*A*-orthogonal vectors.*Aequationes Math*1989, 38: 28–40.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS: On the orthogonal stability of the Pexiderized quadratic equation.
*J Diff Equ Appl*2005, 11: 999–1004.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS: On the stability of the orthogonal Pexiderized Cauchy equation.
*J Math Anal Appl*2006, 318: 211–223.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Szabó Gy: Sesquilinear-orthogonally quadratic mappings.
*Aequationes Math*1990, 40: 190–200.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Moslehian MS, Rassias ThM: Orthogonal stability of additive type equations.
*Aequa-tiones Math*2007, 73: 249–259.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Paganoni L, Rätz J: Conditional function equations and orthogonal additivity.
*Aequa-tiones Math*1995, 50: 135–142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cădariu L, Radu V: Fixed points and the stability of Jensen's functional equation.
*J Inequal Pure Appl Math*2003, 4(1):7. (Art. ID 4)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Diaz J, Margolis B: A fixed point theorem of the alternative for contractions on a generalized complete metric space.
*Bull Am Math Soc*1968, 74: 305–309.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Isac G, Rassias ThM: Stability of
*ψ*-additive mappings: appications to nonlinear analysis.*Int J Math Math Sci*1996, 19: 219–228.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Cădariu L, Radu V: On the stability of the Cauchy functional equation: a fixed point approach.
*Grazer Math Ber*2004, 346: 43–52.Google Scholar - Cădariu L, Radu V: Fixed point methods for the generalized stability of functional equations in a single variable.
*Fixed Point Theory Appl*2008, 2008: 1–5. (Art. ID 749392)Google Scholar - Jung Y, Chang I: The stability of a cubic type functional equation with the fixed point alternative.
*J Math Anal Appl*2005, 306: 752–760.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Mirzavaziri M, Moslehian MS: A fixed point approach to stability of a quadratic equation.
*Bull Braz Math Soc*2006, 37: 361–376.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Saadati R, Park C: Non-Archimedean ℒ-fuzzy normed spaces and stability of functional equations.
*Comput Math Appl*2010, 60: 2488–2496.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Saadati R, Vaezpour SM, Park C: The stability of the cubic functional equation in various spaces.
*Math Commun*2011, 16: 131–145.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Radu V: The fixed point alternative and the stability of functional equations.
*Fixed Point Theory*2003, 4: 91–96.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar - Lee S, Im S, Hwang I: Quartic functional equations.
*J Math Anal Appl*2005, 307: 387–394.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar - Miheţ D, Radu V: On the stability of the additive Cauchy functional equation in random normed spaces.
*J Math Anal Appl*2008, 343: 567–572.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar

## Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.