Open Access

Existence of solutions of a new system of generalized variational inequalities in Banach spaces

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20122012:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-8

Received: 30 July 2011

Accepted: 16 January 2012

Published: 16 January 2012

Abstract

In this article, we consider the solutions of the system of generalized variational inequality problems in Banach spaces. By employing the generalized projection operator, the well-known Fan's KKM theorem and Kakutani-Fan-Glicksberg fixed point theorem, we establish some new existence theorems of solutions for two classes of generalized set-valued variational inequalities in reflexive Banach spaces under some suitable conditions.

AMS Subject classification: 47H04; 47H99; 47J20; 47J40.

Keywords

system of generalized variational inequalities generalized projection reflexive Banach spaces

1 Introduction

Let E be a Banach space, E* be the dual space of E, and let 〈·,·〉 denotes the duality pairing of E* and E. If E is a Hilbert space and K is a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E, then it is well known that the metric projection operator P K : EK plays an important role in nonlinear functional analysis, optimization theory, fixed point theory, nonlinear programming, game theory, variational inequality problem, and complementarity problems, etc. (see example, [132] and the references therein.)

Let K be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of a Hilbert space H and let A : KH be a mapping. The classical variational inequality problem, denoted by VIP(A, K), is to find x* K such that
A x * , z - x * 0

for all z K. The variational inequality has emerged as a fascinating and interesting branch of mathematical and engineering sciences with a wide range of applications in industry, finance, economics, social, ecology, regional, pure, and applied sciences; see, e.g., [3, 10, 11, 17, 2124, 29] and the references therein. Related to the variational inequalities, we have the problem of finding the fixed points of the nonexpansive mappings, which is the current interest in functional analysis. It is natural to consider the unified approach to these different problems; see e.g. [17, 20, 22].

The system of variational inequality problems are the model of several equilibrium problems, namely, traffic equilibrium problem, the spatial equilibrium problem, the Nash equilibrium, the general equilibrium programming problem, etc. For further detail see [2, 6, 12, 13, 18, 33] and the references therein. In [6, 18], some solution methods are proposed. However, the existence of a solution of system of variational inequalities is studied in [2, 6, 12, 13, 33].

On the other hand, Verma [2326] introduced and studied a two step model for some systems of variational inequalities which were difference from the sense of Pang [18] and developed some iterative algorithms for approximating the solutions of these systems in Hilbert spaces base on the convergence analysis of a two step projection method. In 2011, Yao et al. [30] extended the main results of Verma [26] from the Hilbert spaces to the Banach spaces.

In 1994, Alber [34] introduced the generalized projection π K : E* → K and Π K : EK from Hilbert spaces to uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach spaces and studied their in detail. In [35], Alber presented some applications of the generalized projections to approximately solve variational inequalities (1.1) and von Neumann intersection problem in Banach spaces. Let A : KE* be a mapping and let us find x* K such that
A x * - ξ , z - x * 0 , z K ,
(1.1)

where ξ E*.

Recently, Li [16] extended the generalized projection operator π K : E* → K from uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach spaces to reflexive Banach spaces and studied some properties of generalized projection operator with applications to solve the variational inequality (1.1) in Banach spaces. Very recently, the generalized variational inequality problem (GVIP(A,K)) has been studied by many authors (for example, see [19, 28, 36, 37]). It is the problem to find x* K such that there exists u* Ax* satisfying
u * , z - x * 0 , z K .
(1.2)

where A : K → 2E*is a multivalued mapping with nonempty values and 2E*denotes the family of all subset of E*.

In 2009, Wong et al. [27] studied the generalized variational inequality problems defined by a multivalued mapping T, a nonempty closed convex subset K of a Banach space E and b E* is to find x ̄ K such that there exists ū T ( x ̄ ) satisfying
ū - b , y - x ̄ 0 , for all y K ,

in reflexive and smooth Banach spaces by using generalized projection operator, Fan's KKM theorem and minimax theorem.

In this article, we consider the problem for finding the solution of the system of generalized variational inequality problem (1.3) in the sense of Verma [23]. Let K be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E and A, B : K → 2E*be two multivalued mappings with nonempty values, where 2E*denotes the family of all subset of E*. The system of generalized variational inequality problem (SGVIP(A,B,K)) is to find (x*,y*) K × K such that there exist u* Ay*, v* Bx* satisfying
u * , z - x * 0 , x K , v * , z - y * 0 , x K .
(1.3)
If A and B are single-valued, then the system of generalized variational inequality problem is reduced to find (x*,y*) K × K such that
A y * , z - x * 0 , z K , B x * , z - y * 0 , z K ,
(1.4)

which is called a system of variational inequality problem (SVIP(A,B,K)).

Remark 1.1. (i) x* GVIP(A, K) if and only if (x*, x*) SGVIP(A, A, K).

(ii) x* VIP(A, K) if and only if (x*, x*) SVIP(A, A, K).

The purpose of this article is to establish some existence results of solutions for the system variational inequalities (1.3) in reflexive Banach spaces by employing the properties of the generalized projection operator, the well-known Fan's KKM theorem and Kakutani-Fan-Glicksberg theorem.

2 Preliminaries

Let E be a real Banach space and let S = {x E : x = 1} be the unit sphere of E. A Banach space E is said to be strictly convex if for any x, y S,
x y implies x + y 2 < 1 .
(2.1)
It is also said to be uniformly convex if for each ε (0, 2], there exists δ > 0 such that for any x, y S,
x - y ε implies x + y 2 < 1 - δ .
(2.2)
It is known that a uniformly convex Banach space is reflexive and strictly convex; and we define a function δ : [0, 2] → [0,1] called the modulus of convexity of E as follows:
δ ( ε ) = inf 1 - x + y 2 : x , y E , x = y = 1 , x - y ε .
(2.3)

Then E is uniformly convex if and only if δ(ε) > 0 for all ε (0, 2].

A Banach space E is said to be locally uniformly convex if for each ε > 0 and x S, there exists δ(ε, x) > 0 for y S,
x - y ε implies x + y 2 < 1 - δ ( ε , x )
(2.4)

From the above definition, it is easy to see that the following implications are valid: E is uniformly convex E is locally uniformly convex E is strictly convex

A Banach space E is said to be smooth if the limit
lim t 0 x + t y - x t
(9)
exists for all x, y S. It is also said to be uniformly smooth if the limit (2.5) is attained uniformly for x, y S. We recall that E is uniformly convex if and only if E* is uniformly smooth. It is well known that E is smooth if and only if E* is strictly convex. The mapping J : EE* defined by
J ( x ) = x * E : x * , x = x 2 = x * 2 , for all x E ,

is called the duality mapping of E. It is known that J ( x ) = 1 2 x 2 , where ∂ϕ (x) denotes the subdifferential of ϕ at x. The following properties of duality mapping J which are useful for the rest of this work.

Proposition 2.1. [38] Let E be a reflexive Banach space and E* be strictly convex.

(i) The duality mapping J : EE* is single-valued, surjective and bounded.

(ii) If E and E* are locally uniformly convex, then J is a homeomorphism, that is, J and J-1 are continuous single-valued mappings.

Next, we consider the functional V : E* × E defined as
V ( φ , x ) = φ 2 - 2 φ , x + x 2 , forall φ E * , and x E .

It is clear that V(φ, x) is continuous and the map x V(φ, x) and φ V(φ, x) are convex and (φ - x)2V(φ, x) ≤ (φ + x)2. We remark that the main Lyapunov functional V was first introduced by Alber [35] and its properties were studied there. By using this functional, Alber defined a generalized projection operator on uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach spaces which was further extended by Li [16] on reflexive Banach spaces.

Definition 2.2. [16] Let E be reflexive Banach space with its dual E* and K be a nonempty, closed and convex subset of E. The operator π K : E*K defined by
π K ( φ ) = x K : V ( φ , x ) = inf y K V ( φ , y ) , for all φ E * ,
(2.6)

is said to be a generalized projection operator. For each φ E*, the set π K (φ) is called the generalized projection of φ on K.

We mention the following useful properties of the operator π k (φ).

Lemma 2.3. [16] Let E be a reflexive Banach space with its dual E* and K be a nonempty closed convex subset of E, then the following properties hold:

(i) The operator π K : E* → 2 K is single-valued if and only if E is strictly convex.

(ii) If E is smooth, then for any given φ E*, x π K φ if and only ifφ - J(x), x - y〉 ≥ 0, y K.

(iii) If E is strictly convex, then the generalized projection operator π K : E*K is continuous.

Lemma 2.4. [5] In every reflexive Banach space, an equivalent norm can be introduced so that E and E* are locally uniformly convex and thus also strictly convex with respect to the new norm on E and E*.

From Lemma 2.4, we can assume for the rest of this work that the norm · of the reflexive Banach space E is such that E and E* are locally uniformly convex. In this case, we note that the generalized metric projection operator π K and the duality mapping J are single-valued and continuous.

Lemma 2.5. [38] Let A and B be convex subsets of some real topological vector space with B is compact and let p : A × B. If p(·, b) is lower semicontinuous and quasiconvex on A for all b B and p(a, ·) is upper semicontinuous and quasiconcave on B for all a A, then
inf a A max b B p ( a , b ) = max b B inf a A p ( a , b ) .
Definition 2.6 (KKM mapping). Let K be a nonempty subset of a linear space E. A set-valued mapping G : K → 2 E is said to be a KKM mapping if for any finite subset {y1,y2,...,y n } of K, we have
c o y 1 , y 2 , . . . , y n i = 1 n G ( y i )

where co{y1, y2, ..., y n } denotes the convex hull of {y1, y2,..., y n }.

Lemma 2.7 (FanKKM Theorem). Let K be a nonempty convex subset of a Hausdorff topological vector space E and let G : K → 2 E be a KKM mapping with closed values. If there exists a point y0 K such that G(y0) is a compact subset of K, then y K G ( y ) .

Lemma 2.8. [9] Let K be a nonempty compact subset of a locally convex Hausdorff vector topology space E. If S : K → 2 K is upper semicontinuous and for any x K, S(x) is nonempty, convex and closed, then there exists an x* K such that x* S(x*).

Lemma 2.9. [39] Let X and Y be two Hausdorff topological vector spaces and T : X → 2 Y be a set-valued mapping. Then the following properties hold:

(i) If T is closed and T ( X ) ¯ is compact, then T is upper semicontinuous, where T(X) = xXT(x) and T ( X ) ¯ denotes the closure of the set T(X).

(ii) If T is upper semicontinuous and for any x X, T(x) is closed, then T is closed.

(iii) T is lower semicontinuous at x X if and only if for any y T(x) and any net {x α }, x α x, there exists a net {y α } such that y α T(x α ) and y α y.

3 Main result

Proposition 3.1. Let E be a reflexive and smooth Banach space and let K be a closed convex subset of E. Assume that α, β > 0 and A : K → 2E*, B : K → 2E*are two multivalued mappings with nonempty values. Then (x*, y*) is a solution of (1.3) if and only if there exist u* Ay*, v* Bx* such that
x * = π K [ J ( x * ) - α u * ] , y * = π K [ J ( y * ) - β v * ] .
(3.1)
Proof. It follows from the definition of SGVIP(A,B,K) and Lemma 2.3, that (x*, y*) is a solution of (1.3) u* Ay*, v* Bx* such that
u * , z - x * 0 , z K , v * , z - y * 0 , z K . α u * , z - x * 0 , z K , β v * , z - y * 0 , z K . J ( x * ) - α u * - J ( x * ) , x * - z 0 , z K , J ( y * ) - β v * - J ( y * ) , y * - z 0 , z K . x * = π K [ J ( x * ) - α u * ] , y * = π K [ J ( y * ) - β v * ] .

Theorem 3.2. Let E be a reflexive and smooth Banach space such that E and E* are locally uniformly convex. Let K be a compact convex subset of E. Let A : K → 2E*and B : K → 2E*be two upper semicontinuous multivalued mappings with nonempty values such that A(x) and B(x) are weak* compact and convex for each x K. Then the problem (1.3) has a solution and the set of solutions (1.3) is closed.

Proof. Step 1. Let α, β > 0 and fixed x K, for each z K, the sets G x (z) and H x (z) define as follow
G x ( z ) : y K : inf u A x J ( y ) - α u , 2 ( z - y ) + y 2 z 2 , H x ( z ) : y K : inf v B x J ( y ) - β v , 2 ( z - y ) + y 2 z 2 .
(3.2)

(a1) For each z K, we have z G x (z) and z H x (z). Hence G x (z) and H x (z) are nonempty subsets of K.

(a2) For any finite set {z1, z2,..., z n } K we claim that c o { z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n } j = 1 n G x z j and c o { z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n } j = 1 n H x z j .

Let z co{z1, z2,..., z n }. Then z = j = 1 n λ j z j where λ j [0, 1] and j = 1 n λ j = 1 . We observe that
j = 1 n inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 λ j z j - z inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 j = 1 n λ j z j - z = 0 .
Thus,
j = 1 n inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 λ j z j - z + λ j z 2 z 2 j = 1 n λ j z j 2 .
This implies that
j = 1 n inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 λ j z j - z + λ j z 2 - λ j z j 2 0 .
So there exists j > 0 such that
inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 λ j z j - z + λ j z 2 - λ j z j 2 0 .
Hence,
inf u A x J ( z ) - α u , 2 z j - z + z 2 z j 2 .

Therefore z G x z j j = 1 n G x z j . Similarly, we obtain that there exists k > 0 such that z H x z k j = 1 n H x z j . Hence we have the claim. This implies that G x (·) and H x (·) are KKM-mappings.

Step 2. Show that G x (z) and H x (z) are closed for all z K.

Let {x n } be a sequence in G x (z) such that x n x0 in a norm topology. Then there exists u n Ax such that
J ( x n ) - α u n , 2 z - x n + x n 2 = inf u A x J ( x n ) - α u , 2 z - x n + x n 2 z 2 .
(3.3)
Since A(x) is compact, there exists a subsequence u n j of {u n } such that u n j u 0 A ( x ) . Thus without loss of generality, we may assume that u n u0 and observe that
J x n - α u n , 2 z - x n + x n 2 J x 0 - α u 0 , 2 z - x 0 + x 0 2 .
(3.4)
Therefore
inf u A x J x 0 - α u , 2 z - x 0 + x 0 2 J x 0 - α u 0 , 2 z - x 0 + x 0 2 z 2 .
(3.5)

This implies that x0 G x (z) and so G x (z) is closed for all z K. Similarly, we obtain that H x (z) is closed for all z K. Then ∩z KG y (z) and ∩z KH x (z) are also closed.

Step 3. Show that z K G x ( z ) z K H z ( z ) .

Since G x (z) and H x (z) are closed subsets of K and K is compact, G x (z) and H x (z) are compact subsets of K. It follows from Steps 1, 2, and Lemma 2.7 that z K G x ( z ) z K H z ( z ) .

Step 4. Show that the problem (1.3) has a solution.

For any x, y K, we may choose x ̄ z K G y ( z ) and ȳ z K H x ( z ) by Step 3. We define the set-valued mapping S : K × K → 2K×Kby
S ( x , y ) = { x ̄ } , { ȳ } where x ̄ z K G y ( z ) and ȳ z K H x ( z ) , ( x , y ) K × K .
(3.6)
By Definition of S(x, y) and Step 3, we obtain that S(x, y) is a nonempty closed convex subset of K × K for all (x, y) K × K. Since z K G y ( z ) , z K H x ( z ) K and K is compact, z K G y ( z ) ¯ and z K H y ( z ) ¯ are compact. We only show that S is a closed mapping. Indeed, let {(x n , y n )} be a net in K × K such that (x n , y n ) → (x0, y0) in the norm topology and let (u n , v n ) S(x n , y n ) such that (u n , v n ) → (u0, v0). By definition of a mapping S, we have u n , v n x ̄ n , ȳ n where x ̄ n z K G y n ( z ) and ȳ n z K H x n ( z ) . That is for each z K , u n = x ̄ n G y n ( z ) and v n = ȳ n H x n ( z ) . It follows from (3.2) that there exist a n Ay n and b n Bx n such that
J u n - α a n , 2 z - u n + u n 2 = inf u A y n J u n - α u , 2 z - u n + u n 2 z 2 , J v n - β b n , 2 z - v n + v n 2 = inf v B x n J v n - β v , 2 z - v n + v n 2 z 2 .
(3.7)

Now, we define two sets T1 := {x1, x2,..., x n ,...} {x0} and

T2 := {y1, y2,...,y n ,...} {y0}.

It follows from our assumption that A(T2) and B(T1) are compact. Thus there exist two subsequences a n j of {a n } and b n k of {b n } such that a n j a 0 A T 2 and b n k b 0 B T 2 . Since A and B are upper semicontinuous, a0 Ay0 and b0 Bx0. Taking j, k → ∞ in (3.7), we obtain that
inf u A y 0 J u 0 - α u , 2 z - u 0 + u 0 2 J u 0 - α a 0 , 2 z - u 0 + u 0 2 z 2 , inf u B x 0 J v 0 - β v , 2 z - v 0 + v 0 2 J v 0 - β b 0 , 2 z - v 0 + v 0 2 z 2 .
Hence u0 Gy 0(z) and v 0 H x 0 ( z ) for all z K. This implies that (u0, v0) ({u0}, {v0}) = S(x0, y0). Thus, S is a closed mapping. It follows from Lemma 2.9 that S is upper semicontinuous. By Lemma 2.8, there exists a point x * , y * S x * , y * = { x ̄ } , { ȳ } where x ̄ z K G y * ( z ) and ȳ z K H x * ( z ) . That is x * = x ̄ G y * ( z ) and y * = ȳ H x * ( z ) for all z K. By definition of G y* (z) and H x* .(z), we get
inf u A y * J ( x * ) - α u , 2 z - x * + x 2 z 2 , z K , inf v B x * J ( y * ) - β v , 2 z - y * + y 2 z 2 , z K .
(3.8)
This implies that
sup z K inf u A y * J ( x * ) - α u , 2 z - x * + x 2 - z 2 0 , sup z K inf v B x * J ( y * ) - β v , 2 z - y * + y * 2 - z 2 0 .
(3.9)
Put
p 1 ( u , z ) = J ( x * ) - α u , 2 z - x * + x * 2 - z 2 , p 2 ( v , z ) = J ( y * ) - β v , 2 z - y * + y * 2 - z 2 .
(3.10)
Then the functional p1(·, z), p2(·, z) are lower semicontinuous and convex. Also the function p1(u, ·), p2(v, ·) are upper semicontinuous and concave. Apply minimax theorem, we have
sup z K inf u A y * p 1 ( u , z ) = inf u , A y * sup z K p 1 ( u , z ) 0 , sup z K inf v B x * p 2 ( v , z ) = inf v , B x * sup z K p 2 ( v , z ) 0 .
(3.11)
Since the functional u supz Kp1(u, z) and v supz Kp2(v, z) are lower semicontinuous and A(y*),B(x*) are compact, there exist u* A(y*) and v* B(x*) such that
sup z K p 1 u * , z = inf u A y * sup z K p 1 ( u , z ) 0 , sup z K p 2 v * , z = inf v B x * sup z K p 2 ( v , z ) 0 .
(3.12)
This implies that
p 1 u * , z 0 , z K , p 2 v * , z 0 , z K .
(3.13)
That is
J ( x * ) - α u * , 2 z - x * + x * 2 - z 2 0 , z K , J ( y * ) - β v * , 2 z - y * + y * 2 - z 2 0 , z K .
(3.14)
So, we obtain that
V J ( x * ) - α u * , x * V J ( x * ) - α u * , z , z K , V J ( y * ) - β v * , y * V J ( y * ) - β v * , z , z K .
(3.15)

By definition of generalized projection operator, we get x* = π K (J(x*) - αu*) and y* = π K (J(y*) - βv*). It follows from Proposition 3.1 that (x*, y*) is the solutions of problem (1.3).

Step 5. Show that the set of solutions (1.3) is closed.

Put T := {(x, y) K × K : (x, y) is a solution of (1.3)}. Let {(x n , y n )} be a net in T such that (x n , y n ) → (x0, y0) in the norm topology. By definition (1.3) we obtain that there exist u n A(y n ) and v n B(x n ) such that
u n , z - x n 0 , z K , v n , z - y n 0 , z K .
(3.16)

We define two sets T1 := {x1, x2, ..., x n ,...} {x0} and T2 := {y1, y2, ..., y n ,...} {y0}.

It follows from our assumption that A(T2) and B(T1) are compact. Thus there exist two subsequences u n j of {u n } and v n k of {v n } such that u n j u 0 A T 2 and v n k v 0 B T 2 . Since A and B are upper semicontinuous, u0 Ay0 and v0 Bx0. Taking j, k → ∞ in (3.16), we obtain that
u 0 , z - x 0 0 , z K , v 0 , z - y 0 0 , z K .
(3.17)

Thus (x0, y0) T and so T is closed. This completes the proof.

If A and B are two single-valued mappings, then from Theorem 3.2, we derive the following result.

Corollary 3.3. Let E be a reflexive and smooth Banach space such that E and E* are locally uniformly convex. Let K be a compact convex subset of E. Let A : KE* and B:KE* be two continuous single-valued mappings. Then the problem (1.4) has a solution and the set of solutions (1.4) is closed.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thanks The Thailand Research Fund for financial support. Moreover, TT is also supported by the Royal Golden Jubilee Program under Grant PHD/0117/2549, Thailand.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University

References

  1. Baiocchi C, Capelo A: Variational and Quasi-Variational Inequalietis, Application to Free Boundary Problem. Wiley, New York/London; 1984.Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi M: Pseudo P-monotone operators and variational inequalities. In Report 6 Istituto di econometria e Matematica per le decisioni economiche. Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy; 1993.Google Scholar
  3. Chang SS, Lee Joseph HW, Chan CK: A new method for solving equilibrium problem fixed point problem and variational inequality problem with application to optimization. Nonlinear Anal 2009, 70: 3307–3319. 10.1016/j.na.2008.04.035MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cho YJ, Fang YP, Huang NJ, Hwang HJ: Algorithms for systems of nonlinear variational inequalities. J Korean Math Soc 2004, 41: 489–499.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Cioranescu I: Geometry of Banach Spaces Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problem. Kluwer Acadimic Publishers, Dordrecht; 1990.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen G, Chaplais F: Nested monotony for variational inequalities over a product of spaces and convergence of iterative algorithms. J Optim Theory Appl 1988, 59: 360–390.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan K: A generalization of Tychonoff's fixed point theorem. Math Ann 1961, 142: 305–310. 10.1007/BF01353421MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Giannessi F, Maugeri A: Vairational Inequalities and Network Equilibrium Problems. Plenum, New York; 1995.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmes RB: Geometric Functional Analysis and its Application. Springer, New York; 1975.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Isac G: Complementarity problems. In Lecture Notes in Math. Volume 1528. Springer, Berlin; 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Isac G, Sehgal VM, Singh SP: An altenate version of a variational inequality. Indian J Math 1999, 41: 25–31.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Kassay G, Kolumbán J: System of multi-valued variational variational inequalities. Publ Math Debrecen 1999, 54: 267–279.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Kassay G, Kolumbán J, Páles Z: Factorization of Minty and Stampacchia variational inequality system. European J Oper Res 2002, 143: 377–389. 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00290-4MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim JK, Kim DS: A new system of generalized nonlinear mixed variational inequalities in Hilbert spaces. J Convex Anal 2004, 11: 235–243.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Li JL: On the existence of solutions of variational inequalities in Banach space. J Math Anal Appl 2004, 295: 115–126. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.03.010MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li JL: The generalized projection operator on reflexive Banach spaces and its application. J Math Anal Appl 2005, 306: 55–71. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.007MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Nadezhkina N, Takahashi W: Weak convergence theorem by an extragradient method for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. J Optim Theory Appl 2006, 128: 191–201. 10.1007/s10957-005-7564-zMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pang JS: Asymmetric variational inequality problems over product sets: Applications and iterative methods. Math Program 1985, 31: 206–219. 10.1007/BF02591749MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Shih M-H, Tan K-K: Browder-Hartman-Stempacchia variational inequalities for multi-valued monotone operators. J Math Anal Appl 1988, 134: 431–440. 10.1016/0022-247X(88)90033-9MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Suzuki T: Strong convergence of krasnoselskii and mann's type sequences for one-parameter nonexpansive semigroups without bochner integrals. J Math Anal Appl 2005, 305: 227–239. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.017MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Takahashi S, Takahashi W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. J Math Anal Appl 2007, 311(1):506–515.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahashi W, Toyoda M: Weak convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and monotone mappings. J Optim Theory Appl 2003, 118: 417–428. 10.1023/A:1025407607560MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Verma RU: On a new system of nonlinear variational inequalities and associated iterative algorithms. Math Sci Res Hot-Line 1999, 3(8):65–68.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Verma RU: Iterative algorithms and a new system of nonlinear quasivariational inequalities. Adv Nonlinear Var Inequal 2001, 4(1):117–124.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Verma RU: Projection methods, algorithms, and a new system of nonlinear variational inequalities. Comp Math Appl 2001, 41: 1025–1031. 10.1016/S0898-1221(00)00336-9MATHView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Verma RU: General convergence analysis for two-step projection methods and application to variational problems. Appl Math Lett 2005, 18: 1286–1292. 10.1016/j.aml.2005.02.026MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wong M-M, Ansari QH, Yao J-C: Existence of solutions of generalized variational inequalities in reflexive Banach spaces. Appl Math Lett 2009, 22: 197–201. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.03.009MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yao JC: Muti-valued variational inequalities with K-psuedomonotone opeerators. J Optim Theory Appl 1994, 83(2):391–403. 10.1007/BF02190064MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yao JC, Chadli O: Pseudomonotone Complementarity Problems and variational Inequalities. In Handbook of Generalized Convexity and Monotonicity. Edited by: Crouzeix, JP, Haddjissas, N, Schaible, S. Springer, New York; 2005:501–558.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Yao Y, Liou Y-C, Kang SM: Two step projdection methods for a system of variational inequality problems in Banach spaces. J Glob Optim 2011.Google Scholar
  31. Yao Y, Shahzad N: Strong convergence of a proximal point algorithm with general errors. Optim Lett 2011.Google Scholar
  32. Yuan GXZ: KKM Theory and Applications in Nonlinear Analysis. Marcel-Dekker, New York; 1999.Google Scholar
  33. Ansari QH, Yao JC: A fixed point theorem and its applications to a system of variational inequalities. Bull Aust Math Soc 1999, 59: 433–442. 10.1017/S0004972700033116MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Alber Ya: Generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and application. Proceedinng of the Israel Seminar Ariel Israel Funct Differential Equation vol 1994, 1: 1–21.Google Scholar
  35. Alber Ya: Metric and Genernalized Projection Operators in Banach Space: Properties and Application. In Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type. Edited by: Kartsatos, A. Marcel Dekker, New York; 1996:15–50.Google Scholar
  36. Ansari QH, Lin YC, Yao JC: General KKM theorem with applications to minimax and variational inequalities. J Optim Theory Appl 2000, 104(1):41–57.MATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeng LC, Yao JC: Existence theorems for variational inequalities in Banach spaces. J Optim Theory Appl 2007, 132(2):321–337. 10.1007/s10957-006-9139-zMATHMathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeidler E: Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Application, I Fixed-Point Theorems. Springer, New York; 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Aubin JP, Ekeland I: Applied Nonlinear Analysis. Wiley, New York; 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Plubtieng and Thammathiwat; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.