- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Sharpness of Wilker and Huygens type inequalities
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2012, Article number: 72 (2012)
Abstract
We present an elementary proof of Wilker's inequality involving trigonometric functions, and establish sharp Wilker and Huygens type inequalities.
Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 26D05.
1. Introduction
Wilker in [1] proposed two open problems:
-
(a)
Prove that if 0 < x < π/2, then
(1) -
(b)
Find the largest constant c such that
for 0 < x < π/2.
In [2], inequality (1) was proved, and the following inequality
where the constants and are best possible, was also established.
Wilker type inequalities (1) and (2) have attracted much interest of many mathematicians and have motivated a large number of research papers involving different proofs and various generalizations and improvements (cf. [2–13] and the references cited therein). A brief survey of some old and new inequalities associated with trigonometric functions can be found in [14]. These include (among other results) Wilker's inequality.
Another inequality which is of interest to us is Huygens [15] inequality, which asserts that
Neuman and Sándor [16] have pointed out that (3) implies (1). In [17], Zhu established some new inequalities of the Huygens type for trigonometric and hyperbolic functions. Baricz and Sándor [18] pointed out that inequalities (1) and (3) are simple consequences of the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality together with the well-known Lazarević-type inequality [[19], p. 238]
or equivalently,
Wu and Srivastava [[7], Lemma 3] established another inequality
In [20], Chen and Cheung showed that Wilker inequality (1), Huygens inequality (3), Lazarević-type inequality (4) and Wu-Srivastava inequality (5) can be grouped into the following inequality chain:
in terms of the arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means.
In this article, we present an elementary proof of Wilker's inequality (2), and we establish sharp Wilker and Huygens type inequalities.
The following elementary power series expansions are useful in our investigation.
where B n (n = 0, 1,2,...) are Bernoulli numbers, defined by
The following lemma is also needed in the sequel.
Lemma 1. [21] Let a n ∈ ℝ and b n > 0, n = 0,1, 2,... be real numbers with being strictly increasing (respectively, decreasing). If the power series and are convergent for |x| < R, then the function A(x)/B(x) is strictly increasing (respectively, decreasing) on (0, R).
2. An elementary proof of Wilker's inequality (2)
Proof of (2). Consider the function
By using power series expansions (7) and (8), we obtain
where
Elementary calculations reveal that, for 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 8,
Write
It is easy to see that for n ≥ 8,
Hence for all 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 8,
Therefore, for fixed x ∈ (0, π/2), the sequence n ↦ u n (x) is strictly decreasing with regard to n ≥ 8. Hence, for 0 < x < π/2,
Hence f(x) is strictly decreasing on (0, π/2). Noting that , we have
for all , with the constants and being best possible. This completes the proof of (2).
3. Sharp Wilker's inequality
By using power series expansions (8) and (9), we have, for 0 < x < π/2,
It is well known [[22], p. 805] that
By (11), we find that
Hence, we have
Motivated by (12), we are now in a position to establish our first main result.
Theorem 1. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have
The constants and are best possible.
-
(ii)
For 0 < x < π/2, we have
(14)
The constants and are best possible.
Proof. We only prove inequality (13). The proof of (14) is analogous.
Consider the function
By using power series expansions (7) and (10), we find that
where
By (11), we obtain
By induction on n, it is easy to see that
Hence β n > 0 for n ≥ 3, and we have
Therefore, g(x) is strictly increasing on (0, π/2). Noting that , we have
for all , with the constants and being best possible. This completes the proof of (13).
Remark 1. Inequality (14) is sharper than (13). On the other hand, there is no strict comparison between inequalities (2) and (13). There is no strict comparison between inequalities (2) and (14) either.
In view of inequalities (13) and (14), we propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 1. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 3, we have
4. Sharp the Wu-Srivastava inequality
By using power series expansion (10), we obtain for 0 < x < π/2,
Hence for 0 < x < π/2,
Motivated by (16), we establish our second main result:
Theorem 2. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have
The constant is best possible.
-
(ii)
For 0 < x < π/2, we have
(18)
The constant is best possible.
Proof. We only prove inequality (18). The proof of (17) is analogous.
Consider the function
where
with
and
with
We claim that the function G(x) is strictly decreasing on (0, π/2). By Lemma 1, it suffices to show that
It is known [[23], p. 96] that
By using (20), we obtain
and
So (19) is a consequence of the elementary inequality
which is equivalent to
The proof of the inequality (21) is not difficult, and is left with the readers. This proves the claim.
Noting that , we have
with the constant being best possible. This completes the proof of (18).
In view of inequalities (17) and (18), we propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 2. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 1,
5. Skarp Huygens inequality
By using power series expansions (7) and (9), for 0 < x < π/2, we have
By (11), we find that
Hence we have
Motivated by (23), we establish our third main result:
Theorem 3. (i) For 0 < x < π/2, we have
The constants and are best possible.
-
(ii)
For 0 < x < π/2, we have
(25)
The constants and are best possible.
Proof. We only prove inequality (25). The proof of (24) is analogous.
Consider the function
By using power series expansions (8) and (10), we find that
where
By (11), we obtain
By induction on n, it is easy to show that
Hence c n > 0 for n ≥ 3, and we have
Therefore, h(x) is strictly increasing on (0, π/2). Noting that and , we have
for all with the constants and being possible. This completes the proof of (25).
Remark 2. There is no strict comparison between inequalities (24) and (25).
In view of inequalities (24) and (25), we propose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 3. For 0 < x < π/2 and n ≥ 2, we have
References
Wilker JB: Problem E 3306. Am Math Mon 1989, 96: 55. 10.2307/2323260
Sumner JS, Jagers AA, Vowe M, Anglesio J: Inequalities involving trigonometric functions. Am Math Mon 1991, 98: 264–267. 10.2307/2325035
Guo BN, Qiao BM, Qi F, Li W: On new proofs of Wilker inequalities involving trigonometric functions. Math Inequal Appl 2003, 6: 19–22.
Mortitc C: The natural approach of Wilker-Cusa-Huygens inequalities. Math Inequal Appl 2011, 14: 535–541.
Neuman E: On Wilker and Huygens type inequalities. Math Inequal Appl, in press.
Pinelis I: L'Hospital rules of monotonicity and Wilker-Anglesio inequality. Am Math Mon 2004, 111: 905–909. 10.2307/4145099
Wu SH, Srivastava HM: A weighted and exponential generalization of Wilker's inequality and its applications. Integr Trans Spec Funct 2007, 18: 529–535. 10.1080/10652460701284164
Wu SH, Srivastava HM: A further refinement of Wilker's inequality. Integr Trans Spec Funct 2008, 19: 757–765. 10.1080/10652460802340931
Zhang L, Zhu L: A new elementary proof of Wilker's inequalities. Math Inequal Appl 2008, 11: 149–151.
Zhu L: A new simple proof of Wilker's inequality. Math Inequal Appl 2005, 8: 749–750.
Zhu L: On Wilker-type inequalities. Math Inequal Appl 2007, 10: 727–731.
Zhu L: Some new Wilker-type inequalities for circular and hyperbolic functions. Abstr Appl Anal 2009, 2009: 9. (Article ID 485842)
Zhu L: A source of inequalities for circular functions. Comput Math Appl 2009, 58: 1998–2004. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.076
Srivastava R: Some families of integral, trigonometric and other related inequalities. Appl Math Inf Sci 2011, 5: 342–360.
Huygens C: Oeuvres Completes 1888–1940. Société Hollondaise des Science, Haga;
Neuman E, Sándor J: On some inequalities involving trigonometric and hyperbolic functions with emphasis on the Cusa-Huygens, Wilker, and Huygens inequalities. Math Inequal Appl 2010, 13: 715–723.
Zhu L: Some new inequalities of the Huygens type. Comput Math Appl 2009, 58: 1180–1182. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.07.045
Baricz A, Sándor J: Extensions of generalized Wilker inequality to Bessel functions. J Math Inequal 2008, 2: 397–406.
Mitrinović DS: Analytic Inequalities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin; 1970.
Chen CP, Cheung WS: Wilker- and Huygens-type inequalities and solution to Oppenheim's problem. Integr Trans Spec Funct, in press.
Ponnusamy S, Vuorinen M: Asymptotic expansions and inequalities for hypergeometric functions. Mathematika 1997, 44: 278–301. 10.1112/S0025579300012602
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. In Appl Math Ser National Bureau of Standards. Volume 55. 9th edition. Washington, D.C; 1972.
Kuang J-Ch: Applied Inequalities. 3rd edition. Shandong Science and Technology Press, Jinan City, Shandong Province, China (Chinese); 2004.
Acknowledgements
The research is supported in part by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, Project No. HKU7016/07P
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, CP., Cheung, WS. Sharpness of Wilker and Huygens type inequalities. J Inequal Appl 2012, 72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-72
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-72