Optimal generalized Heronian mean bounds for the logarithmic mean

Hong-Xing Shi; Bo-Yong Long; Yu-Ming Chu

doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-63

Research

Open Access

Optimal generalized Heronian mean bounds for the logarithmic mean

Hong-Xing Shi¹,
Bo-Yong Long² and
Yu-Ming Chu³Email author

Journal of Inequalities and Applications20122012:63

https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-63

Received: 22 December 2011

Accepted: 13 March 2012

Published: 13 March 2012

Abstract

In this article, we establish a double inequality between the generalized Heronian and logarithmic means. The achieved result is inspired by the articles of Lin and Shi et al., and the methods from Janous. The inequalities we obtained improve the existing corresponding results and, in some sense, are optimal.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26E60.

Keywords

generalized Heronian meanlogarithmic meanpower mean

1 Introduction

The logarithmic mean L(a, b) of two positive numbers a and b is defined by

L (a, b) = \{\begin{matrix} \frac{a - b}{log a - log b}, & a \neq b, \\ a, & a = b . \end{matrix}

(1.1)

Recently, the logarithmic mean has been^: the subject of intensive research. In particular, many remarkable inequalities for the logarithmic mean can be found in the literature [1–30]. It might be surprising that the logarithmic mean has applications in physics, economics, and even in meteorology [31–33]. In [31], Kahlig and Matkowski study a variant of Jensen's functional equation involving the logarithmic mean, which appears in a heat conduction problem. A representation of the logarithmic mean as an infinite product and an iterative algorithm for computing the logarithmic mean as the common limit of two sequences of special geometric and arithmetic means are given in [17]. In [34, 35] it is shown that the logarithmic mean can be expressed in terms of Gauss's hypergeometric function ₂F₁. And, in [35], Carlson and Gastafson prove that the reciprocal of the logarithmic mean is strictly totally positive, that is, every n × n determinant with elements $\frac{1}{L (x_{i}, y_{i})}$ , where 0 < x₁< x₂< ... < x_n and 0 < y₁< y₂< ... < y_n are positive for all n ≥ 1.

The power mean of order r of two positive numbers a and b is defined by

M_{r} (a, b) = \{\begin{matrix} {(\frac{a^{r} + b^{r}}{2})}^{\frac{1}{r}} & r \neq 0, \\ \sqrt{a b}, & r = 0 . \end{matrix}

(1.2)

It is well-known that M_r (a, b) is continuous and strictly increasing with respect to $r \in ℝ$ for fixed a, b > 0 with a ≠ b.

Lin [18] presents the sharp power mean bounds for logarithmic mean as follows:

M_{0} (a, b) < L (a, b) < M_{\frac{1}{3}} (a, b)

(1.3)

for all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b.

For ω ≥ 0 and

p \in ℝ

the generalized Heronian mean H_p,ω (a, b) of two positive numbers a and b is introduced by Shi et al. [36] as follows:

H_{p, ω} (a, b) = \{\begin{matrix} {[\frac{a^{p} + ω {(a b)}^{\frac{p}{2}} + b^{p}}{ω + 2}]}^{\frac{1}{p}}, & p \neq 0, \\ \sqrt{a b}, & p = 0 . \end{matrix}

(1.4)

From (1.2) and (1.4) we clearly see that H_p_,0(a, b) = M_p (a, b) for all $p \in ℝ$ and a, b > 0. It easily follows from (1.4) that H_p,ω (a, b) is continuous with respect to $p \in ℝ$ for fixed a, b > 0 and ω ≥ 0, strictly increasing with respect to $p \in ℝ$ for fixed a, b > 0 with a ≠ b and ω ≥ 0, strictly decreasing with respect to ω ≥ 0 for fixed a, b > 0 with a ≠ b and p > 0, and strictly increasing with respect to ω ≥ 0 for fixed a, b > 0 with a ≠ b and p < 0.

In [37], Janous prove that

L (a, b) < H_{1,4} (a, b)

(1.5)

for all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b.

The purpose of this article is to find the greatest value p = p(ω) and the least value q = q(ω) such that the double inequality H_p,ω (a, b) < L(a, b) < H_q,ω (a, b) holds for fixed ω ≥ 0 and all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b.

2 Main result

Theorem 2.1. For fixed ω ≥ 0 and all a, b > 0 with a ≠ b we have

H_{0, ω} (a, b) < L (a, b) < H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6}, ω} (a, b),

(2.1)

and $H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6}, ω} (a, b)$ and H_0,ω(a, b) are the best possible upper and lower generalized Heronian mean bounds of the logarithmic mean L(a, b), respectively.

Proof. Without loss of generality, we assume a > b and put

t = \frac{a}{b} > 1

. Then from (1.1) and (1.4) we get

\begin{gathered} log [L (a, b)] - log [H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6}, ω} (a, b)] \\ = log (\frac{t - 1}{log t}) - \frac{6}{ω + 2} log (\frac{1 + ω t^{{\frac{ω + 2}{12}}_{}} + t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}}}{ω + 2}) . \end{gathered}

(2.2)

Let

f (t) = log (\frac{t - 1}{log t}) - \frac{6}{ω + 2} log (\frac{1 + ω t^{{\frac{ω + 2}{12}}_{}} + t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}}}{ω + 2}) .

(2.3)

Then simple computations lead to

lim_{t \to 1 +} f (t) = 0,

(2.4)

f^{'} (t) = \frac{f_{1} (t)}{t (t - 1) (1 + ω t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}}) log t},

(2.5)

where

f_{1} (t) = (\frac{ω}{2} t^{\frac{ω + 14}{12}} + t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}} + \frac{ω}{2} t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + t) log t - t^{\frac{ω + 8}{6}} + t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}} - ω t^{\frac{ω + 14}{12}} + ω t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} - t + 1

.

f_{1} (1) = 0,

(2.6)

\begin{gathered} {f^{'}}_{1} (t) = [\frac{ω (ω + 14)}{24} t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + \frac{ω (ω + 2)}{24} t^{\frac{ω + 10}{12}} + \frac{ω + 2}{6} t^{\frac{ω + 4}{6}} + 1]] log t \\ - \frac{ω + 8}{6} t^{\frac{ω + 2}{6}} + \frac{ω + 8}{6} t^{\frac{ω + 4}{6}} - \frac{ω (ω + 8)}{12} t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + \frac{ω (ω + 8)}{12} t^{\frac{ω - 10}{12}}, \end{gathered}

(2.7)

f_{1}^{'} (1) = 0,

(2.8)

f_{1}^{″} (t) = \frac{1}{288} t^{\frac{ω - 10}{6}} f_{2} (t),

(2.9)

where

\begin{gathered} f_{2} (t) = [ω (ω + 2) (ω + 14) t^{\frac{10 - ω}{12}} + ω (ω + 2) (ω - 10) t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + 8 (ω + 2) (ω - 4)] log t - 2 ω (ω^{2} + \\ 4 ω - 68) t^{\frac{10 - ω}{12}} + 2 ω (ω^{2} + 4 ω - 68) t^{- \frac{ω + 2}{12}} + 288 t^{\frac{4 - ω}{6}} - 8 (ω + 2) (ω + 8) t + 8 (ω^{2} + 10 ω - 20) \end{gathered}

.

f_{2} (1) = 0,

(2.10)

f_{2}^{'} (t) = \frac{1}{12} t^{- \frac{ω + 14}{12}} f_{3} (t),

(2.11)

where

\begin{gathered} f_{3} (t) = - [ω (ω + 2) (ω + 14) (ω - 10) t - ω {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω - 10)] log t + 2 ω (ω^{3} - 12 ω + 848) t + \\ 2 ω {(ω + 2)}^{2} (4 - ω) + 96 (ω + 2) (ω - 4) t^{\frac{ω + 12}{12}} - 576 (ω - 4) t^{\frac{10 - ω}{12}} - 96 (ω + 2) (ω + 8) t^{\frac{ω + 14}{12}} . \end{gathered}

f_{3} (1) = 0,

(2.12)

\begin{array}{l} {f^{'}}_{3} (t) & = - ω (ω + 2) (ω + 14) (ω - 10) log t - ω {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω - 10) t^{- 1} \\ + 8 {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω - 4) t^{\frac{ω + 10}{12}} - 8 (ω + 2) (ω + 8) (ω + 14) t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} \\ + 48 (ω - 4) (ω - 10) t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} + ω (ω^{3} - 6 ω^{2} + 108 ω + 1976), \end{array}

(2.13)

f_{3}^{'} (1) = 0,

(2.14)

f_{3}^{″} (t) = t^{- 2} f_{4} (t),

(2.15)

where

\begin{gathered} f_{4} (t) = - ω (ω + 2) (ω + 14) (ω - 10) t + ω {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω - 10) + \frac{2}{3} {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω - 4) (ω - \\ 10) t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} - \frac{2}{3} {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω + 8) (ω + 14) t^{\frac{ω + 14}{12}} - 4 (ω - 2) (ω - 4) (ω - 10) t^{\frac{10 - ω}{12}} . \end{gathered}

f_{4} (1) = - 8 (ω + 2) (5 ω^{2} - 10 ω + 32) < 0,

(2.16)

\begin{array}{l} {f^{'}}_{4} (t) & = - ω (ω + 2) (ω + 14) (ω - 10) + \frac{1}{18} {(ω + 2)}^{3} (ω - 4) (ω - 10) t^{\frac{ω - 10}{12}} \\ - \frac{1}{18} {(ω + 2)}^{2} (ω + 8) {(ω + 14)}^{2} t^{\frac{ω + 2}{12}} \\ + \frac{1}{3} (ω + 2) (ω - 4) {(ω - 10)}^{2} t^{- \frac{ω + 2}{12}}, \end{array}

(2.17)

f_{4}^{'} (1) = - \frac{2}{3} (ω + 2) (5 ω^{3} + 60 ω^{2} - 108 ω + 448) < 0,

(2.18)

f_{4}^{″} (t) = \frac{1}{216} {(ω + 2)}^{2} t^{- \frac{ω + 14}{12}} f_{5} (t),

(2.19)

where

f_{5} (t) = (ω + 2) (ω - 4) {(ω - 10)}^{2} t^{\frac{ω - 4}{6}} - (ω + 2) (ω + 8) {(ω + 14)}^{2} t^{\frac{ω - 2}{6}} - 6 (ω - 4) {(ω - 10)}^{2}

.

f_{5} (1) = - 6 (11 ω^{3} + 36 ω^{2} + 588 ω + 256) < 0,

(2.20)

f_{5}^{'} (t) = \frac{ω + 2}{6} t^{\frac{ω - 10}{6}} f_{6} (t),

(2.21)

where

f_{6} (t) = {(ω - 4)}^{2} {(ω - 10)}^{2} - (ω + 2) (ω + 8) {(ω + 14)}^{2} t,

(2.22)

f_{6} (1) = - 6 (11 ω^{3} + 36 ω^{2} + 588 ω + 256) < 0 .

(2.23)

From (2.22) we clearly see that f₆(t) is strictly decreasing in [1, +∞), then (2.23) leads to that

f_{6} (t) < 0

(2.24)

for t ∈ (1, + ∞).

It easily follows from (2.5)-(2.21) and (2.24) that

f^{'} (t) < 0

(2.25)

for t ∈ (1, + ∞).

Therefore, $L (a, b) < H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6}, ω} (a, b)$ follows from (2.2)-(2.4) and (2.25).

On the other hand, H_0,ω(a, b) = M₀(a, b) < L(a, b) follows from (1.3).

Next, we prove that H_0,ω(a, b) and $H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6}, ω} (a, b)$ are the optimal lower and upper generalized Heronian mean bounds of the logarithmic mean L(a, b).

For any

0 < ε < \frac{ω + 2}{6}

, ω ≥ 0 and x > 0, from (1.1) and (1.4) we have

\begin{gathered} lim_{x \to + \infty} \frac{H_{ε, ω} (1, x)}{L (1, x)} \\ = {(ω + 2)}^{- \frac{1}{ε}} lim_{x \to + \infty} [\frac{{(1 + ω x^{- \frac{ε}{2}} + x^{- ε})}^{\frac{1}{ε}}}{1 - \frac{1}{x}} log x] \\ = + \infty, \end{gathered}

(2.26)

\begin{gathered} log [L (1, 1 + x)] - log [H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6} - ε, ω} (1, 1 + x)] \\ = \frac{ε}{4 (ω + 2)} x^{2} + o (x^{3}) (x \to 0) . \end{gathered}

(2.27)

Equations (2.26) and (2.27) imply that for any ω ≥ 0 and $0 < ε < \frac{ω + 2}{6}$ there exist sufficiently large X = X(ε, ω) > 1 and sufficiently small δ = δ (ε, ω) > 0; such that H_ε,ω (1, x) > L(1, x) for x ∈ (X, +∞) and $L (1, 1 + x) > H_{\frac{ω + 2}{6} - ε, ω} (1, 1 + x)$ for x ∈ (0, δ).

Remark 2.1. If we take ω = 0, then inequality (2.1) reduce to inequality (1.3).

Remark 2.2. If we take ω = 4, then the upper bound in inequality (2.1) becomes the upper bound in inequality (1.5).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 11071069, 11171307, 11171105), the Social Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 10BTJ001), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant no. 09JJ6003), and the Innovation Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Zhejiang Province (Grant no. T200924).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)

School of Primary Education, Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong, China

(2)

School of Mathematical Science, Anhui University, Hefei, China

(3)

School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Hunan City University, Yiyang, China

References

Xia W-F, Chu Y-M, Wang G-D: The optimal upper and lower power mean bounds for a convex combination of the arithmetic and logarithmic means. Abstr Appl Anal 2010., 2010: Article ID 604804, 10Google Scholar
Chu Y-M, Xia W-F: Two optimal double inequalities between power mean and logarithmic mean. Comput Math Appl 2010, 60(1):83–89. 10.1016/j.camwa.2010.04.032MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shi M-Y, Chu Y-M, Jiang Y-P: Optimal inequalities among various means of two arguments. Abstr Appl Anal 2009, 2009: Article ID 694394, 10.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Chu Y-M, Xia W-F: Inequalities for generalized logarithmic means. J Inequal Appl 2009, 2009: Article ID 763252, 7.Google Scholar
Long B-Y, Chu Y-M: Optimal inequalities for generalized logarithmic, arithmetic, and geometric means. J Inequal Appl 2010, 2010: Article ID 806825, 10.Google Scholar
Chu Y-M, Long B-Y: Best possible inequalities between generalized logarithmic mean and classical means. Abstr Appl Anal 2010, 2010: Article ID 303286, 13.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Qiu Y-F, Wang M-K, Chu Y-M, Wang G-D: Two sharp inequalities for Lehmer mean, identric mean and logarithmic mean. J Math Inequal 2010, 5(3):301–306.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Xia W-F, Chu Y-M: Optimal inequalities related to the logarithmic, identric, arith-metic and harmonic means. Rev Anal Numér Théor Approx 2010, 39(2):176–183.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Chu Y-M, Wang S-S, Zong C: Optimal lower power mean bound for the convex combination of harmonic and logarithmic means. Abstr Appl Anal 2011, 2011: Article ID 520648, 9.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Chu Y-M, Wang M-K: Optimal inequalities between harmonic, geometric, logarithmic, and arithmetic-geometric means. J Appl Math 2011, 2011: Article ID 618929, 9.Google Scholar
Chu Y-M, Hou S-W, Gong W-M: Inequalities between logarithmic, harmonic, arith-metic and centroidal means. J Math Anal 2011, 2(2):1–5.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Hu H-N, Wang S-S, Chu Y-M: Optimal upper power mean bound for the convex combination of harmonic and logarithmic means. Pac J Appl Math 2011, 4(1):35–44.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Qiu Y-F, Wang M-K, Chu Y-M: The sharp combination bounds of arithmetic and logarithmic means for Seiffert's mean. Int J Pure Appl Math 2011, 72(1):11–18.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Allasia G, Giordano C, Pečarić J: On the arithmetic and logarithmic means with applications to Stirling's formula. Atti Sem Mat Fis Univ Modena 1999, 47(2):441–455.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Alzer H: Ungleichungen für Mittelwerte. Arch Math 1986, 47(5):422–426. 10.1007/BF01189983MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Burk F: The geometric, logarithmic, and arithmetic mean inequality. Am Math Monthly 1987, 94(6):527–528. 10.2307/2322844MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Carlson BC: The logarithmic mean. Am Math Monthly 1972, 79: 615–618. 10.2307/2317088View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lin TP: The power mean and the logarithmic mean. Am Math Monthly 1974, 81: 879–883. 10.2307/2319447View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Maloney J, Heidel J, Pečarić J: A reverse Hölder type inequality for the logarithmic mean and generalizations. J Austral Math Soc Ser B 2000, 41(3):401–409. 10.1017/S0334270000011322MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pittenger AO: Inequalities between arithmetic and logarithmic means. Univ Beograd Publ Elektrotehn Fak Ser Mat Fiz 1980, (678–715):15–18.Google Scholar
Pittenger AO: The symmetric, logarithmic and power means. Univ Beograd Publ ElektrotehnFak Ser Mat Fiz 1980, 678–715: 19–23.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Sándor J: On the identric and logarithmic means. Aequationes Math 1990, 40(2–3):261–270.MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sándor J: A note on some inequalities for means. Arch Math 1991, 56(5):471–473. 10.1007/BF01200091MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sándor J: On certain identities for means. Studia Univ Babeş-Bolyai Math 1993, 38(4):7–14.Google Scholar
Sándor J: On certain inequalities for means. J Math Anal Appl 1995, 189(2):602–606. 10.1006/jmaa.1995.1038MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sándor J: On certain inequalities for means II. J Math Anal Appl 1996, 199(2):629–635. 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0165MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sándor J: On certain inequalities for means III. Arch Math 2001, 76(1):34–40. 10.1007/s000130050539MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Stolarsky KB: The power and generalized logarithmic means. Am Math Monthly 1980, 87(7):545–548. 10.2307/2321420MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vamanamurthy MK, Vuorinen M: Inequalities for means. J Math Anal Appl 1994, 183(1):155–166. 10.1006/jmaa.1994.1137MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Alzer H, Qiu S-L: Inequalities for means in two variables. Arch Math 2003, 80(2):201–215. 10.1007/s00013-003-0456-2MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kahlig P, Matkowski J: Functional equations involving the logarithmic mean. Z Angew Math Mech 1996, 76(7):385–390. 10.1002/zamm.19960760710MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pittenger AO: The logarithmic mean in n variables. Am Math Monthly 1985, 92(2):99–104. 10.2307/2322637MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Pólya G, Szegö G: Isoperimetric Inequalities in Mathematical Physics. Princeton Uni-versity Press, Princeton 1951.Google Scholar
Carlson BC: Algorithms involving arithmetic and geometric means. Am Math Monthly 1971, 78: 496–505. 10.2307/2317754View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Carlson BC, Gastafson JL: Total positivity of mean values and hypergeometric func-tions. SIAM J Math Anal 1983, 14(2):389–395. 10.1137/0514030MathSciNetView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Shi H-N, Bencze M, Wu Sh-H, Li D-M: Schur convexity of generalized Heronian means involving two parameters. J Inequal Appl 2008., 2008: Article ID 879273, 9Google Scholar
Janous W: A note on generalized Heronian means. Math Inequal Appl 2001, 4(3):369–375.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.