 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Quasilinearity of some functionals associated with monotonic convex functions
Journal of Inequalities and Applications volume 2012, Article number: 276 (2012)
Abstract
Some quasilinearity properties of composite functionals generated by monotonic and convex/concave functions and their applications in improving some classical inequalities such as the Jensen, Hölder and Minkowski inequalities are given.
MSC:26D15.
1 Introduction
The problem of studying the quasilinearity properties of functionals associated with some celebrated inequalities such as the Jensen, CauchyBunyakowskySchwarz, Hölder, Minkowski and other famous inequalities has been investigated by many authors during the last 50 years.
In the following, in order to provide a natural background that will enable us to construct composite functionals out of simple ones and to investigate their quasilinearity properties, we recall a number of concepts and simple results that are of importance for the task.
Let X be a linear space. A subset C\subseteq X is called a convex cone in X provided the following conditions hold:

(i)
x,y\in C imply x+y\in C;

(ii)
x\in C, \alpha \ge 0 imply \alpha x\in C.
A functional h:C\to \mathbb{R} is called superadditive (subadditive) on C if

(iii)
h(x+y)\ge (\le )\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}h(x)+h(y) for any x,y\in C
and nonnegative (strictly positive) on C if, obviously, it satisfies

(iv)
h(x)\ge (>)\phantom{\rule{0.25em}{0ex}}0 for each x\in C.
The functional h is spositive homogeneous on C for a given s>0 if

(v)
h(\alpha x)={\alpha}^{s}h(x) for any \alpha \ge 0 and x\in C.
If s=1, we simply call it positive homogeneous.
In [1], the following result has been obtained.
Theorem 1 Let x,y\in C and h:C\to \mathbb{R} be a nonnegative, superadditive and spositive homogeneous functional on C. If M\ge m\ge 0 are such that xmy and Myx\in C, then
Now, consider v:C\to \mathbb{R} an additive and strictly positive functional on C which is also positive homogeneous on C, i.e.,

(vi)
v(\alpha x)=\alpha v(x) for any \alpha >0 and x\in C.
In [2] we obtained further results concerning the quasilinearity of some composite functionals.
Theorem 2 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C. If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive (subadditive) functional on C and p,q\ge 1 (0<p, q<1), then the functional
is superadditive (subadditive) on C.
Theorem 3 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C. If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive functional on C and 0<p,q<1, then the functional
is subadditive on C.
Another result similar to Theorem 1 has been obtained in [2] as well, namely
Theorem 4 Let x,y\in C, h:C\to \mathbb{R} be a nonnegative, superadditive and spositive homogeneous functional on C and v be an additive, strictly positive and positive homogeneous functional on C. If p,q\ge 1 and M\ge m\ge 0 are such that xmy, Myx\in C, then
where {\mathrm{\Psi}}_{p,q} is defined by (1.2).
As shown in [1] and [2], the above results can be applied to obtain refinements of the Jensen, Hölder, Minkowski and Schwarz inequalities for weights satisfying certain conditions.
The main aim of the present paper is to study quasilinearity properties of other composite functionals generated by monotonic and convex/concave functions and to apply the obtained results to improving some classical inequalities as those mentioned above.
2 Some general results
We start with the following general result.
Theorem 5 (Quasilinearity theorem)
Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C.

(i)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive (subadditive) functional on C and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave (convex) and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}:C\to \mathbb{R} defined by
{\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(x):=v(x)\mathrm{\Phi}\left(\frac{h(x)}{v(x)}\right)(2.1)
is superadditive (subadditive) on C.

(ii)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive (subadditive) functional on C and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is convex (concave) and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} is subadditive (superadditive) on C.
Proof (i) Assume that h is superadditive and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}). Then
and since v(x+y)=v(x)+v(y) for any x,y\in C, by the monotonicity of Φ, we have
for any x,y\in C.
Now, since \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave,
for any x,y\in C.
Utilizing (2.2) and (2.3), we get
for any x,y\in C, which shows that the functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} is superadditive on C.
Now, if h:C\to \mathbb{R} is a subadditive functional on C and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is convex and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the inequalities (2.2), (2.3) and (2.4) hold with the reverse sign for any x,y\in C, which shows that the functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} is subadditive on C.

(ii)
Follows in a similar manner and the details are omitted. □
Corollary 1 (Boundedness property)
Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive and positive homogeneous functional on C. Let x,y\in C and assume that there exist M\ge m>0 such that xmy and Myx\in C.

(a)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is concave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then
M{\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(y)\ge {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(x)\ge m{\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(y).(2.5)
(aa) If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a subadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is concave and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then (2.5) is valid as well.
Proof We observe that if v and h are positive homogeneous functionals, then {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} is also a positive homogeneous functional, and by the quasilinearity theorem above, it follows that in both cases {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} is a superadditive functional on C. By applying Theorem 1 for s=1, we deduce the desired result. □
Remark 1 (Monotonicity property)
Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X. We say, for x,y\in X, that x{\ge}_{C}y (x is greater than y relative to the cone C) if xy\in C. Now, observe that if x,y\in C and x{\ge}_{C}y, then under the assumptions of Corollary 1, by (2.5), we have that {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(x)\ge {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}(y), which is a monotonicity property for the functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}.
There are various possibilities to build such functionals. For instance, for the finite families of functionals {v}_{i}:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) and {h}_{i}:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) with i\in I (I is a finite family of indices) and \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave/convex and monotonic, then the composite functional {\sigma}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}: C\to \mathbb{R} defined by
has the same properties as the functional {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}.
If, for a given cone C, we consider the Cartesian product {C}^{n}:=C\times \cdots \times C\subset {X}^{n} and define, for the vector \overline{x}:=({x}_{1},\dots ,{x}_{n})\in {C}^{n}, the functional {\varpi}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}:{C}^{n}\to \mathbb{R} given by
where v and h defined on C are as above, then we observe that {\varpi}_{\mathrm{\Phi}} has the same properties as {\eta}_{\mathrm{\Phi}}.
There are some natural examples of composite functionals that are embodied in the propositions below.
Proposition 1 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C.

(i)
If h:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive functional on C and r>0, then the composite functional {\eta}_{r}: C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
{\eta}_{r}(x):=\frac{{[v(x)]}^{1+r}}{{[h(x)]}^{r}}(2.8)
is subadditive on C. In particular, {\eta}_{1}(x)=\frac{{v}^{2}(x)}{h(x)} is subadditive.

(ii)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive functional on C and q\in (0,1), then the composite functional {\eta}_{q}:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
{\eta}_{q}(x):={[v(x)]}^{1q}{[h(x)]}^{q}(2.9)
is superadditive on C. In particular, {\eta}_{1/2}(x)=\sqrt{v(x)h(x)} is superadditive.

(iii)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a subadditive functional on C and p\ge 1, then the composite functional {\eta}_{p}:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
{\eta}_{p}(x):=\frac{{[h(x)]}^{p}}{{[v(x)]}^{p1}}(2.10)
is subadditive on C. In particular, {\eta}_{2}(x)=\frac{{h}^{2}(x)}{v(x)} is subadditive.
Proof Follows from Theorem 5 for the function \mathrm{\Phi}:(0,\mathrm{\infty})\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}), \mathrm{\Phi}(t)={t}^{s} which is convex and decreasing for s\in (\mathrm{\infty},0), concave and increasing for s\in (0,1) and convex and increasing for s\in [1,\mathrm{\infty}). The details are omitted. □
The following boundedness property also holds.
Corollary 2 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive and positive homogeneous functional on C. Let x,y\in C and assume that there exist M\ge m>0 such that xmy and Myx\in C. If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and q\in (0,1), then
In particular,
Proposition 2 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C.

(i)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a subadditive functional on C, then the composite functional {\epsilon}_{\alpha}:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
{\epsilon}_{\alpha}(x):=v(x)exp\left(\frac{\alpha h(x)}{v(x)}\right)(2.13)
is subadditive on C provided \alpha >0.

(ii)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive functional on C, then the composite functional {\epsilon}_{\alpha} is also subadditive on C when \alpha <0.
The proof follows from Theorem 5. The details are omitted.
Remark 2 Similar composite functionals can be considered for the functions \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} defined as follows:
For instance, if we consider the composite functional
where h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive functional on C, v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is an additive functional on C and C is a convex cone in the linear space X, then by the quasilinearity theorem, we conclude that {\eta}_{arctan}:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is superadditive on C. Moreover, if v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is an additive and positive homogeneous functional on C, h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and x,y\in C such that there exist M\ge m>0 with the property that xmy and Myx\in C, then
The same properties hold for the composite functional generated by the hyperbolic tangent function, namely
however, the details are omitted.
Taking into account the above result and its applications for various concrete examples of convex functions, it is therefore natural to investigate the corresponding results for the case of logconvex functions, namely functions \mathrm{\Psi}:I\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}), I is an interval of real numbers for which lnΨ is convex.
We observe that such functions satisfy the elementary inequality
for any a,b\in I and t\in [0,1]. Also, due to the fact that the weighted geometric mean is less than the weighted arithmetic mean, it follows that any logconvex function is a convex function. However, obviously, there are functions that are convex but not logconvex.
Theorem 6 (Quasimultiplicity theorem)
Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C.

(i)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive (subadditive) functional on C and \u03dc:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is logconcave (logconvex) and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\xi}_{\u03dc}:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
{\xi}_{\u03dc}(x):={\left[\u03dc\left(\frac{h(x)}{v(x)}\right)\right]}^{v(x)}(2.14)
is supermultiplicative (submultiplicative) on C, i.e., we recall that
for any x,y\in C.

(ii)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive (subadditive) functional on C and \u03dc:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is logconvex (logconcave) and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\eta}_{\u03dc} is submultiplicative (supemultiplicative) on C.
Proof We observe that
for any x\in C.
Applying now the quasilinearity theorem for the functions log(\u03dc), we deduce the desired result.
The details are omitted. □
Corollary 3 (Exponential boundedness)
Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive and positive homogeneous functional on C. Let x,y\in C and assume that there exist M\ge m>0 such that xmy and Myx\in C.

(a)
If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a superadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and \u03dc:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [1,\mathrm{\infty}) is logconcave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then
{\left[\u03dc\left(\frac{h(y)}{v(y)}\right)\right]}^{Mv(y)}\ge {\left[\u03dc\left(\frac{h(x)}{v(x)}\right)\right]}^{v(x)}\ge {\left[\u03dc\left(\frac{h(y)}{v(y)}\right)\right]}^{mv(y)}.(2.16)
(aa) If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a subadditive and positive homogeneous functional on C and \u03dc:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [1,\mathrm{\infty}) is logconcave and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then (2.16) is valid as well.
There are numerous examples of logconvex (logconcave) functions of interest that can provide some nice examples.
Following [3], we consider the following Dirichlet series:
for which we assume that the coefficients {a}_{n}\ge 0 for n\ge 1 and the series is uniformly convergent for s>1.
It is obvious that in this class we can find the zeta function
and the lambda function
where s>1.
If \mathrm{\Lambda}(n) is the von Mangoldt function, where
then [[4], p.3]:
If d(n) is the number of divisors of n, we have [[4], p.35] the following relationships with the zeta function:
and [[4], p.36]
where \omega (n) is the number of distinct prime factors of n.
We use the following result, see [3]
Lemma 1 The function ψ defined by (2.17) is nonincreasing and logconvex on (1,\mathrm{\infty}).
Utilizing the quasimultiplicity theorem and this lemma, we can state the following result as well.
Proposition 3 Let C be a convex cone in the linear space X and v:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) be an additive functional on C. If h:C\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) is a subadditive functional on C and \psi :(1,\mathrm{\infty})\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) is defined by (2.17), then the composite functional {\xi}_{\psi}:C\to (0,\mathrm{\infty}) defined by
is submultiplicative on C.
Proof We observe that the function \u03dc(t):=\psi (t+1) is well defined on (0,\mathrm{\infty}) and is nonincreasing and logconvex on this interval. Applying Theorem 6, we deduce the desired result. □
3 Applications
3.1 Applications for Jensen’s inequality
Let C be a convex subset of the real linear space X and let f:C\to \mathbb{R} be a convex mapping. Here we consider the following wellknown form of Jensen’s discrete inequality:
where I denotes a finite subset of the set ℕ of natural numbers, {x}_{i}\in C, {p}_{i}\ge 0 for i\in I and {P}_{I}:={\sum}_{i\in I}{p}_{i}>0.
Let us fix I\in {\mathcal{P}}_{f}(\mathbb{N}) (the class of finite parts of ℕ) and {x}_{i}\in C (i\in I). Now, consider the functional J:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R} given by
where {S}_{+}(I):=\{\mathbf{p}={({p}_{i})}_{i\in I}{p}_{i}\ge 0,i\in I\text{and}{P}_{I}0\} and f is convex on C.
We observe that {S}_{+}(I) is a convex cone and the functional {J}_{I} is nonnegative and positive homogeneous on {S}_{+}(I).
Lemma 2 ([5])
The functional {J}_{I}(\cdot ) is a superadditive functional on {S}_{+}(I).
For a function \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R}, define the following functional {\xi}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R}:
By the use of Theorem 5, we can state the following proposition.
Proposition 4 If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\xi}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R} defined by (3.3) is superadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is convex and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\xi}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I} is subadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
Proof Consider the functionals v(\mathbf{p}):={P}_{I} and h(\mathbf{p}):={J}_{I}(\mathbf{p}). We observe that v is additive, h is superadditive and
Applying Theorem 5, we deduce the desired result. □
Corollary 4 If \mathbf{p},\mathbf{q}\in {S}_{+}(I) and M\ge m\ge 0 are such that M\mathbf{p}\ge \mathbf{q}\ge m\mathbf{p}, i.e., M{p}_{i}\ge {q}_{i}\ge m{p}_{i} for each i\in I, then
for any \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) concave and monotonic nondecreasing function on [0,\mathrm{\infty}).
The proof follows from Corollary 1 and the details are omitted.
On utilizing Proposition 1, statement (ii), we observe that the functional {\xi}_{q,I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}), where q\in (0,1) and
is superadditive and monotonic nondecreasing on {S}_{+}(I).
If \mathbf{p},\mathbf{q}\in {S}_{+}(I) and M\ge m\ge 0 are such that M\mathbf{p}\ge \mathbf{q}\ge m\mathbf{p}, then
Now, if we consider the following composite functional {\xi}_{arctan,I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to [0,\mathrm{\infty}) given by
then by utilizing Remark 2 we conclude that {\xi}_{arctan,I} is superadditive and monotonic nondecreasing on {S}_{+}(I).
Moreover, if \mathbf{p},\mathbf{q}\in {S}_{+}(I) and M\ge m\ge 0 are such that M\mathbf{p}\ge \mathbf{q}\ge m\mathbf{p}, then
It is also well known that if f:C\to \mathbb{R} is a strictly convex mapping on C and, for a given sequence of vectors {x}_{i}\in C (i\in I), there exist at least two distinct indices k and j in I so that {x}_{k}\ne {x}_{j}, then
for any \mathbf{p}\in {S}_{+}(I)=\{\mathbf{p}={({p}_{i})}_{i\in I}{p}_{i}\ge 0,i\in I\text{and}{P}_{I}0\}.
In this situation, for the function f and the sequence {x}_{i}\in C (i\in I), we can define the functional
that is well defined on {S}_{+}(I). Utilizing the statement (i) from Proposition 1, we conclude that {\eta}_{r,I}(\cdot ) is a subadditive functional on {S}_{+}(I).
We know that the hyperbolic cotangent function coth(t):=\frac{{e}^{t}+{e}^{t}}{{e}^{t}{e}^{t}} is decreasing and convex on (0,\mathrm{\infty}). If we consider the composite functional
for a function f:C\to \mathbb{R} that is strictly convex on C and for a given sequence of vectors {x}_{i}\in C (i\in I) for which there exist at least two distinct indices k and j in I so that {x}_{k}\ne {x}_{j}, then we observe that this functional is well defined on {S}_{+}(I), and by the statement (ii) of Theorem 5, we conclude that {\xi}_{coth,I}(\cdot ) is also a subadditive functional on {S}_{+}(I).
3.2 Applications for Hölder’s inequality
Let (X,\parallel \cdot \parallel ) be a normed space and I\in {\mathcal{P}}_{f}(\mathbb{N}). We define
and
We consider for \gamma ,\beta >1, \frac{1}{\gamma}+\frac{1}{\beta}=1 the functional
The following result has been proved in [1].
Lemma 3 For any \mathbf{p},\mathbf{q}\in {S}_{+}(I), we have
where x\in E(I), \lambda \in \mathbb{K}(I) and \gamma ,\beta >1 with \frac{1}{\gamma}+\frac{1}{\beta}=1.
Remark 3 The same result can be stated if (B,\parallel \cdot \parallel ) is a normed algebra and the functional H is defined by
where x={({x}_{i})}_{i\in I},y={({y}_{i})}_{i\in I}\subset B, \mathbf{p}\in {S}_{+}(I) and \gamma ,\beta >1 with \frac{1}{\gamma}+\frac{1}{\beta}=1.
For a function \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R}, define the following functional {\omega}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R}:
By the use of Theorem 5, we can state the following proposition.
Proposition 5 If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\omega}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R} defined by (3.11) is superadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is convex and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\omega}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I} is subadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
By choosing various examples of concave and monotonic nondecreasing or convex and monotonic nonincreasing functions Φ on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), the reader can provide various examples of superadditive or subadditive functionals on {S}_{+}(I). The details are omitted.
3.3 Applications for Minkowski’s inequality
Let (X,\parallel \cdot \parallel ) be a normed space and I\in {\mathcal{P}}_{f}(\mathbb{N}). We define the functional
where \mathbf{p}\in {S}_{+}(I), \delta \ge 1 and x,y\in E(I).
The following result concerning the superadditivity of the functional {M}_{I}(\cdot ,x,y;\delta ) holds [1].
Lemma 4 For any \mathbf{p},\mathbf{q}\in {S}_{+}(I), we have
where x,y\in E(I) and \delta \ge 1.
For a function \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R}, define the following functional {\varkappa}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R}:
By the use of Theorem 5, we can state the following proposition.
Proposition 6 If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is concave and monotonic nondecreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\varkappa}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I}:{S}_{+}(I)\to \mathbb{R} defined by (3.13) is superadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
If \mathrm{\Phi}:[0,\mathrm{\infty})\to \mathbb{R} is convex and monotonic nonincreasing on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), then the composite functional {\varkappa}_{\mathrm{\Phi},I} is subadditive on {S}_{+}(I).
We notice that, by choosing various examples of concave and monotonic nondecreasing or convex and monotonic nonincreasing functions Φ on [0,\mathrm{\infty}), the reader can provide various examples of superadditive or subadditive functionals on {S}_{+}(I). The details are omitted.
Remark 4 For other examples of superadditive (subadditive) functionals that can provide interesting inequalities similar to the ones outlined above, we refer to [6–9] and [10–12].
References
Dragomir SS: Inequalities for superadditive functionals with applications. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2008, 77: 401–411.
Dragomir SS: Quasilinearity of some composite functionals with applications. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2011, 83: 108–121. 10.1017/S0004972710000444
Cerone P, Dragomir SS: Some convexity properties of Dirichlet series with positive terms. Math. Nachr. 2009, 282(7):964–975. 10.1002/mana.200610783
Ivić A: The Riemann ZetaFunction, Theory and Applications. Dover, New York; 1985.
Dragomir SS, Pečarić J, Persson LE: Properties of some functionals related to Jensen’s inequality. Acta Math. Hung. 1996, 70: 129–143. 10.1007/BF00113918
Alzer H: Sub and superadditive properties of Euler’s gamma function. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2007, 135(11):3641–3648. 10.1090/S0002993907090570
Losonczi L: Sub and superadditive integral means. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 307(2):444–454. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.092
Trimble SY, Wells J, Wright FT: Superadditive functions and a statistical application. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 1989, 20(5):1255–1259. 10.1137/0520082
Vitolo A, Zannier U: Inequalities for superadditive functions related to a property R [of] convex sets. Boll. Unione Mat. Ital., A 1990, 4(3):309–314.
Volkmann P: Sur les fonctions simultanément suradditives et surmultiplicatives. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. R. S. Roumanie (N.S.) 1984, 28(76)(2):181–184.
Dragomir SS: Advances in Inequalities of the Schwarz, Triangle and Heisenberg Type in Inner Product Spaces. Nova Science Publishers, New York; 2007.
Dragomir SS, Mond B: On the superadditivity and monotonicity of Schwarz’s inequality in inner product spaces. Pril.  Maked. Akad. Nauk. Umet., Odd. Mat.Teh. Nauki 1994, 15(2):5–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Dragomir, S. Quasilinearity of some functionals associated with monotonic convex functions. J Inequal Appl 2012, 276 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2012276
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1029242X2012276